IS 2386 PART 51963AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete, Part V: Soundness
1963 Edition

This standard outlines procedures to assess the durability of concrete aggregates by measuring their resistance to degradation upon exposure to saturated solutions of sodium sulphate or magnesium sulphate. It is crucial for professionals aiming to ensure the longevity and weathering resistance of concrete structures by evaluating aggregate soundness.

10Sections
128Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1963Edition
Cement Concrete Aggregates and RCCCategory
Alternative search terms: soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 pdf free download, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 free download pdf, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 1963 PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963:1963 PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963-1963 PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 (1963) PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 1963 edition PDF, soundness-testing-methods-for-concrete-aggregates-1963 edition 1963 PDF

What This Standard Covers

This standard outlines procedures to assess the durability of concrete aggregates by measuring their resistance to degradation upon exposure to saturated solutions of sodium sulphate or magnesium sulphate. It is crucial for professionals aiming to ensure the longevity and weathering resistance of concrete structures by evaluating aggregate soundness.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Structural Engineers
  • Concrete Material Specialists
  • Quality Assurance Inspectors
  • Laboratory Testing Personnel
  • Construction Supervisors
  • Aggregate Material Providers
  • Civil Engineering Consultants

Key Topics Covered

Assessment of aggregate soundness
Application of sodium and magnesium sulphate solutions
Procedures for sample preparation and grading
Specifications for testing apparatus and containers
Temperature control during soundness evaluation
Detailed quantitative analysis of test samples
Measurement of aggregate disintegration and weight loss
Sieve analysis pre- and post-testing
Documentation and interpretation of test outcomes
Handling protocols for coarse and fine aggregates
Repetitive immersion and drying cycles
Computing weighted average percentage loss

Table of Contents

1Introduction and Scope

Overview of Soundness Testing

  • Defines the technical scope for evaluating aggregates' resistance to weathering-induced disintegration.
  • Excludes contractual stipulations.
  • Emphasizes rounding conventions as per IS 2:1960.

Essential Sieves (Clause 2.1)

Fine Sieve Sizes (mm)Coarse Sieve Sizes (mm)
0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.18, 2.36, 4.0, 4.758, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80
  • Conformance to IS 460:1962 mandatory.

Test Data Recording (Clause 9.2, Table I)

  • Parameters include sieve size, percentage grading, initial weight, percentage passing after test, and weighted average loss.
  • Separate consideration given to fine and coarse aggregates.

Rounding Guidelines

  • Follow IS 2:1960 for numerical rounding maintaining significant digits.
flowchart TD
    A[Aggregate Sample] --> B[Sieving as per IS 460]
    B --> C[Conduct Soundness Test]
    C --> D[Record Weight and Grading Data]
    D --> E[Compute Weighted Loss Percentage]
    E --> F[Apply Rounding Rules]
    F --> G[Evaluate Aggregate Quality]
2Required Equipment

Overview of Apparatus

Sieves (Clause 2.1)

  • Square mesh sieves per IS 460-1962.
  • Fine series include 0.15 to 4.75 mm sizes.
  • Coarse series between 8 mm and 80 mm.

Drying Oven (Clause 2.5)

  • Operating temperature: 105°C to 110°C.
  • Evaporation rate must be at least 25 grams per hour over 4 hours with door closed.
  • Verified by water loss from beakers at controlled temperature.

Data Recording (Clause 9.2)

  • Use Table I format documenting sieve size, grading percentage, initial weight, post-test percentage passing, and weighted average loss.
graph LR
A[Sieves] --> B[Fine Range: 0.15 - 4.75 mm]
A --> C[Coarse Range: 8 - 80 mm]
D[Drying Oven] --> E[Temp: 105-110°C]
D --> F[Evaporation ≥ 25 g/h]
G[Soundness Data] --> H[Record and Calculate Loss]
3Sampling and Sample Preparation

Sample Requirements (Clause 4.1)

  • Fine aggregates should pass through a 10 mm IS sieve.
  • Minimum 100 grams required for each size fraction representing at least 5% of the total sample.

Size Fractions

Passing SieveRetained On
600 μm300 μm
1.18 mm600 μm
2.36 mm1.18 mm
4.75 mm2.36 mm
10 mm4.75 mm

Sieving Details

  • Use IS 460:1962 compliant sieves.
  • Fine series: 150, 300, 600 μm, 1.18, 2.36, 4.0, 4.75 mm.
  • Coarse series: 8, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80 mm.

Loss Calculation

  • If any size fraction is under 5% of total weight, assign percentage loss from the next smaller fraction.

Data Recording

  • Capture sieve size, grading percentage, pre-test weight, post-test percentage passing, and weighted average loss.
4Test Sample Specifications

Fine Aggregate Criteria (Clause 4.1)

  • Must pass through the 10 mm sieve.
  • Each size fraction making up 5% or more of the sample must weigh at least 100 grams.

Coarse Aggregate Criteria (Clause 4.2)

  • Remove particles finer than 4.75 mm.
  • Minimum sample weights vary by size fraction, for example: | Size Range (mm) | Required Weight (g) | Notes | |-----------------|--------------------|-------| | 10 - 4.75 | 300 | | | 20 - 10 | 1000 | Composition ratio specified | | 40 - 20 | 1500 | Composition ratio specified | | 63 - 40 | 3000 | Composition ratio specified | | ≥ 80 | 3000 | Size distribution required |

Reporting Format

  • Document sieve sizes, grading percentages, weights before testing, percentage passing after testing, and weighted average corrected loss.

Notes

  • If a fraction is less than 5%, use loss from adjacent sizes.
  • Larger sample sizes are permissible.
5Preparation of Test Samples

Sample Grading and Size (Clause 4.1 & 4.4)

  • Fine aggregates to pass through 10 mm sieve.

  • Each size fraction with ≥5% content must provide at least 100 g.

  • Size divisions as follows: | Passing Sieve | Retained On | |---------------|-------------| | 600 μm | 300 μm | | 1.18 mm | 600 μm | | 2.36 mm | 1.18 mm | | 4.75 mm | 2.36 mm | | 10 mm | 4.75 mm |

  • For fractions under 5%, assign loss as average of neighboring fractions.

Sieves Specification (Clause 2.1)

Fine Series (μm/mm)Coarse Series (mm)
150, 300, 600 μm, 1.18, 2.36, 4.758, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80

Calculation of Weighted Average Loss

  • Use weighted sum of percent loss multiplied by weight fraction before testing.
6Testing Procedure

Equipment (Clause 2.1)

  • Employ sieves conforming to IS 460:1962 standards.
  • Fine sieves: 150, 300, 600 μm, 1.18, 2.36, 4.75 mm.
  • Coarse sieves: 8 to 80 mm range.

Quantitative Analysis (Clause 7.1)

  • After completing the final cycle and cooling, wash samples to eliminate sulphate residues verified by BaCl2 test.
  • Dry samples at 105–110°C to constant weight.
  • Sieve samples according to aggregate sizes: | Aggregate Size (mm) | Sieve for Loss Analysis (mm) | |---------------------|------------------------------| | 63 - 40 | 31.5 | | 40 - 20 | 16 | | 20 - 10 | 8 | | 10 - 4.75 | 4 |

Reporting (Clause 9.2)

  • Record sieve size, grading percentage, initial weight, post-test percentage passing, and weighted average corrected loss.

Rounding

  • Round results in accordance with IS 2:1960, preserving significant figures.
7Quantitative Analysis Details

Procedure (Clause 7.1)

  • Following the final immersion cycle and cooling, wash the specimen to remove residual sulphates confirmed by BaCl2 test.
  • Dry fractions at 105–110°C to constant weight and weigh each.
  • Sieve according to size: | Aggregate Size (mm) | Sieve for Loss Determination (mm) | |---------------------|----------------------------------| | 63 - 40 | 31.5 | | 40 - 20 | 16 | | 20 - 10 | 8 | | 10 - 4.75 | 4 |

Recording

  • Use Table I format capturing sieve size, grading, pre-test weight, post-test passing percentage, and weighted average loss.

Additional Notes

  • Qualitative inspection involves visual assessment of fragmentation types.
  • Combined post-test fractions should be sieved to obtain cumulative percentage retained on standard sieves.
8Qualitative Assessment

Visual Inspection (Clause 8.2)

  • Examine each fraction for signs of excessive grain splitting, disintegration, cracking, flaking, or crumbling.
  • Focus primarily on particles larger than 20 mm but also inspect smaller sizes.

Sieve Analysis After Testing

  • Combine all fractions and detritus.
  • Perform sieve analysis using sizes: 150, 300, 600 μm, 1.18, 2.36 mm, 4.75, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mm.
  • Record cumulative percentage retained.

Quantitative Steps

  • Wash sample to remove sulphate residues using BaCl2 test.
  • Dry at 105–110°C to constant weight.
  • Sieve according to aggregate size classifications.
flowchart TD
    A[Post-Test Sample] --> B[Wash and BaCl2 Test]
    B --> C[Dry at 105-110°C]
    C --> D[Weigh and Sieve Fractions]
    D --> E{Particle Size}
    E -->|>20 mm| F[Visual Damage Evaluation]
    E -->|≤20 mm| G[Optional Visual Inspection]
    D --> H[Record Cumulative % Retained]
9Documentation of Test Results

Reporting Requirements (Clauses 9.1 & 9.2)

  • Include weights of individual size fractions before testing.
  • Document percentage finer by weight for each fraction.
  • Calculate and report weighted average percentage loss using grading data.
  • For particles over 20 mm, count total and damaged particles (disintegration, cracking, etc.).
  • State solution type used (Na2SO4 or MgSO4).

Rounding

  • Follow IS 2:1960 rounding practices maintaining significant digits.

Suggested Reporting Table (Table I)

Sieve SizeRetained OnGrading %Weight Before Test (g)% Passing After TestWeighted Average Loss %
Example: 600 μm300 μm26.01004.21.09

Calculation

  • Weighted average loss computed as sum of (grading % × loss %) divided by 100.
10Additional Notes and Best Practices

Data Recording (Clause 9.2)

  • Use standardized forms capturing sieve sizes (ranging from 150 μm to 63 mm), weights before and after testing, and computed weighted average losses.

Quantitative Examination (Clause 7.1)

  • After final test cycle and cooling, wash samples free of salts (verified with BaCl2).
  • Dry at 105–110°C to a constant weight.
  • Sieve fine aggregates using original sieves and coarse aggregates with specified sieve sizes based on their dimensions.

Sieves Specifications (Clause 2.1)

  • Employ sieves complying with IS 460:1962.
  • Fine sieve sizes: 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.18, 2.36, 4.75 mm.
  • Coarse sieve sizes: 8, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80 mm.

Rounding Procedures (Clause 0.5)

  • Round off results as per IS 2:1960, preserving the significant figures of the reported values.

Weighted Average Loss Formula

  • Weighted average loss is the sum of each fraction's percentage loss multiplied by its grading percentage, divided by 100.

Popular Questions About IS 2386 PART 5

?Why are sodium sulphate and magnesium sulphate solutions used in the soundness test?

These solutions simulate environmental weathering by inducing cycles of salt crystallization and hydration that test the aggregates' resistance to breakdown. The method evaluates how well aggregates withstand disintegration caused by sulfate attack, offering a predictive indication of their durability, especially when past performance data is unavailable. Aggregates are immersed in saturated sodium or magnesium sulphate solutions at controlled temperatures for set durations, and weight loss after repeated cycles indicates soundness.

?What are the procedures for preparing and grading aggregate samples for testing under this standard?

Fine aggregates are washed, dried, and sieved through a 10 mm IS sieve, then separated into size fractions using a series of sieves ranging from 300 microns to 10 mm. Each fraction representing 5% or more of the total sample must weigh at least 100 g. Coarse aggregates are similarly washed and dried, with particles finer than 4.75 mm removed, and separated into prescribed size ranges with minimum sample weights specified for each. Particles coarser than 20 mm are also counted for quantity.

?What apparatus and containers are necessary to perform the soundness test correctly?

The test requires wire mesh baskets or perforated containers that allow free solution flow and drainage without loss of aggregate particles, with solution volume at least five times the aggregate volume. Additional equipment includes containers holding saturated sodium or magnesium sulphate solutions, drying ovens maintained at 105 to 110°C, and precise weighing balances. This setup ensures thorough exposure and accurate weight measurements throughout the testing cycles.

?How is the aggregate material loss determined after soundness test cycles?

After completing the immersion cycles, aggregates are washed to eliminate sulfate residues (verified by a barium chloride test), dried to constant weight at 105–110°C, and sieved according to size. Weight of each fraction is measured before and after testing. Percentage loss per fraction is calculated based on weight difference, and the overall weighted average loss is computed using the grading percentages of the sample, providing a quantitative measure of degradation.

?What are the common acceptance criteria for aggregate soundness in this standard?

Aggregates are subjected to five cycles of immersion in sulfate solutions followed by drying, and their soundness is determined by percentage weight loss. Typically, coarse aggregates should not exceed 12% loss under severe exposure, while fine aggregates may have up to 18% loss. Exceeding these limits suggests insufficient durability for concrete exposed to weathering. Lower weight loss values indicate better resistance and suitability for use.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 2386 PART 5. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required