The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 4 outlines standardized techniques for quantitatively evaluating the roughness of rock mass discontinuities. It emphasizes measuring surface irregularities to assess shear strength, detailing field and lab procedures such as linear profiling, compass-disc clinometer use, and photogrammetry for both accessible and inaccessible joints.
Overview
The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 4 outlines standardized techniques for quantitatively evaluating the roughness of rock mass discontinuities. It emphasizes measuring surface irregularities to assess shear strength, detailing field and lab procedures such as linear profiling, compass-disc clinometer use, and photogrammetry for both accessible and inaccessible joints.
Audience
Contents
Structure
The peak shear strength (T_i6) is calculated from the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) and Joint Compressive Strength (JCS) by the relation:
[ T_{i6} = \tan \left(5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
where:
Figure 5 depicts shear strength curves for varying JCS values to assist in selecting appropriate JRC values.
| Class | Roughness Type | Intermediate Scale |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
flowchart LR
A[Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC)] --> B[Shear Strength Estimation]
[ \tau = \sigma_n \tan \left(5.10910 \cdot JCS + 30^\circ \right) ]
Where:
( \tau ) = shear stress (MPa)
( \sigma_n ) = normal stress (MPa)
( JCS ) = joint-wall compressive strength (MPa)
The Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) correlates roughness profiles with shear resistance.
| Scale | Roughness Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate | Stepped, Undulating, Planar | Profile categories I through IX |
| Small Scale | Rough, Smooth, Slickensided | Directional influence on shear strength |
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Energy | joule | J |
graph TD
A[Intermediate Roughness] --> B[Stepped]
A --> C[Undulating]
A --> D[Planar]
B --> I[Rough]
B --> II[Smooth]
B --> III[Slickensided]
C --> IV[Rough]
C --> V[Smooth]
C --> VI[Slickensided]
D --> VII[Rough]
D --> VIII[Smooth]
D --> IX[Slickensided]
[ \tau_i = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
This formula links joint roughness and compressive strength to shear resistance.
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Energy | joule | J |
Refer to the full standard for detailed unit definitions.
graph TD
A[Stepped] --> I[Rough (I)]
A --> II[Smooth (II)]
A --> III[Slickensided (III)]
B[Undulating] --> IV[Rough (IV)]
B --> V[Smooth (V)]
B --> VI[Slickensided (VI)]
C[Planar] --> VII[Rough (VII)]
C --> VIII[Smooth (VIII)]
C --> IX[Slickensided (IX)]
| Small Scale \ Intermediate Scale | Stepped | Undulating | Planar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rough | I | IV | VII |
| Smooth | II | V | VIII |
| Slickensided | III | VI | IX |
Peak shear strength (( \tau )) is derived using JRC and JCS:
[ \tau = \tan(5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ) \times \sigma_n ]
where
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N (kg·m/s²) |
| Stress | pascal | Pa (N/m²) |
| Energy | joule | J (N·m) |
| Power | watt | W (J/s) |
graph TD
A[Small Scale Roughness] -->|Rough| B[Stepped (I)]
A -->|Smooth| C[Stepped (II)]
A -->|Slickensided| D[Stepped (III)]
IS 11315 Part 4: Techniques for Quantifying Roughness
Photogrammetric Approach (Clauses 3.10 & 4.1.6):
Linear Profiling Technique (Clause 3.8):
| Method | Instruments | Measurement Range | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photogrammetric | Camera, tapered 1 m ruler | Millimeter scale details | Photos for min, modal, and max roughness |
| Linear Profiling | Folding straight edge, wire, clinometer | Centimeters to meters | Wire used as a tensioned reference line |
flowchart LR
A[Start] --> B{Select Measurement Method}
B -->|Photogrammetric| C[Position 1 m ruler]
C --> D[Capture Images]
D --> E[Measure Perpendicular Offsets (y)]
B -->|Linear Profiling| F[Set Folding Straight Edge]
F --> G[Tension Wire with Markings]
G --> H[Record Offsets & Dip with Clinometer]
E & H --> I[Quantitative Roughness Analysis]
I --> J[Document and Report]
IS 11315 Part 4 - Guidelines for Reporting Results
| Profile ID | Small Scale | Intermediate Scale |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
| Profile | Small Scale | Intermediate Scale | Approximate Shear Strength Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped | Highest |
| II | Smooth | Stepped | High |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped | Moderate |
| IV | Rough | Undulating | High |
| V | Smooth | Undulating | Moderate |
Determining Shear Strength from Rock Joint Roughness (IS 11315 Part 4)
[ \tau_{on} = \tan \left( 20 \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
Where:
| Scale | Roughness Type | Typical Classes |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate | Stepped, Undulating, Planar | I to IX |
| Small Scale | Rough, Smooth, Slickensided | I to IX |
flowchart LR
A[Roughness Profile] --> B[Determine JRC]
B --> C[Calculate Dilation Angle (i)]
C --> D[Compute Shear Strength]
D --> E[\tau_{on} = \tan(20 \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ) \times \sigma_n]
IS 11315 Part 4 - Notes on Instruments and Procedures
Compass and Disc-Clinometer Method (Clause 3.9):
Photogrammetric Method (Clause 3.10):
[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) ]
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress/Pressure | pascal | Pa |
| Time | second | s |
flowchart LR
A[Begin Sampling] --> B{Select Plate Diameter}
B --> C[40 cm Plate]
B --> D[20 cm Plate (50 positions)]
B --> E[10 cm Plate (75 positions)]
B --> F[5 cm Plate (100 positions)]
C --> G[Record Dip and Roughness]
D --> G
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H[Calculate Shear Strength using Ti6 formula]
H --> I[Analyze and Document Results]
IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) - Common Roughness Profiles and Classification
Intermediate scale roughness types (three levels):
Superimposed small scale roughness (three types):
| Class | Small Scale Roughness | Intermediate Scale Roughness |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
graph TD
A[Intermediate Scale] --> B[Stepped]
A --> C[Undulating]
A --> D[Planar]
B --> I[Rough (I)]
B --> II[Smooth (II)]
B --> III[Slickensided (III)]
C --> IV[Rough (IV)]
C --> V[Smooth (V)]
C --> VI[Slickensided (VI)]
D --> VII[Rough (VII)]
D --> VIII[Smooth (VIII)]
D --> IX[Slickensided (IX)]
Photogrammetric Technique per IS 11315 Part 4
| Diameter (cm) | Reading Scatter | Roughness Angle Magnitude |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | High | Large |
| 10 | Moderate | Moderate |
| 20 | Low | Small |
| 40 | Very Low | Very Small |
flowchart LR
A[Photogrammetric Method] --> B[Data Acquisition]
B --> C[Stereoscopic Plotting]
B --> D[Stereo Comparator]
C & D --> E[Coordinate Recording]
E --> F[Compute Profiles/Contours]
F --> G[Derive Surface Roughness]
G --> H[Estimate Shear Strength and Dilation]
[ \tau_{16} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
where:
( \tau_{16} ) = peak shear strength (MPa)
( JCS ) = joint wall compressive strength (MPa)
( \sigma_n ) = normal stress (MPa)
Roughness profiles correspond to JRC values ranging from 0 (smooth) to 20 (very rough).
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Time | second | s |
flowchart TD
A[Field Data Collection] --> B[Photogrammetry]
B --> C[Coordinate Acquisition]
C --> D[Generate Contour Maps and Profiles]
D --> E[Calculate Shear Strength]
A --> F[Compass and Disc-Clinometer]
F --> G[Measure Dip and Direction]
G --> H[Plot on Equal Area Nets]
IS 11315 Part 4 - Roughness Data Interpretation
Roughness is categorized on two scales:
Combination of these scales results in nine roughness classes:
| Class | Small Scale | Intermediate Scale |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
| Roughness Class | Description | Shear Strength Rank |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough + Stepped | Highest |
| II | Smooth + Stepped | High |
| III | Slickensided + Stepped | Moderate |
| IV | Rough + Undulating | High |
| V | Smooth + Undulating | Moderate |
Impact of Weathering on Rock Joint Strength (IS 11315 Part 4, Clause 6.2.2)
The residual friction angle (( \phi_r )) varies with the degree of weathering and rock type:
Estimation using the Schmidt hammer rebound method:
[ \phi_r = \phi_{unweathered} \times \frac{r}{r + r_0} ]
where:
Shear strength of discontinuities is calculated as:
[ \tau_{on} = \tan \left( 20 \cdot \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
where:
flowchart LR
A[Unweathered Surface] -->|Measure r0| B[Record Rebound]
C[Weathered Surface] -->|Measure r| D[Record Rebound]
B & D --> E[Calculate \( \phi_r = \phi_{unweathered} \times \frac{r}{r + r_0} \)]
E --> F[Estimate Reduced Shear Strength]
IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) - Glossary and Unit Definitions
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Mass | kilogram | kg |
| Time | second | s |
| Electric Current | ampere | A |
| Thermodynamic Temperature | kelvin | K |
| Luminous Intensity | candela | cd |
| Amount of Substance | mole | mol |
Supplementary Units:
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Plane Angle | radian | rad |
| Solid Angle | steradian | sr |
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Force | newton | N | 1 N = 1 kg·m/s² |
| Energy | joule | J | 1 J = 1 N·m |
| Power | watt | W | 1 W = 1 J/s |
| Magnetic Flux | weber | Wb | 1 Wb = 1 V·s |
| Magnetic Flux Density | tesla | T | 1 T = 1 Wb/m² |
| Frequency | hertz | Hz | 1 Hz = 1 cycle/s |
| Electric Conductance | siemens | S | 1 S = 1 A/V |
| Electromotive Force | volt | V | 1 V = 1 W/A |
| Pressure, Stress | pascal | Pa | 1 Pa = 1 N/m² |
Two roughness scales are recognized:
Descriptive categories include:
| Intermediate Scale | Small Scale (superimposed) |
|---|---|
| Stepped | Rough |
IS 11315 Part 4 - Important Annexure Formulas and Tables
From Clause 5.10910:
[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
This equation estimates peak shear strength based on roughness and compressive strength.
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Pressure/Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Energy | joule | J |
| Power | watt | W |
graph TD
A[JCS (MPa)] --> B[Calculate Peak Shear Strength]
B --> C[T_i6 = tan(5.10910 * JCS + 30°) * \sigma_n]
C --> D[Peak Shear Strength (MPa)]
E[JRC Profiles] --> F[Classify Roughness]
F --> G[Adjust Shear Strength Estimation]
Summary: Employ the tangent-based equation with JCS and normal stress for peak shear strength determination. Refer to JRC profile classes for qualitative shear strength variation. SI units ensure measurement consistency.
Frequently Asked
IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) prescribes measuring rock joint roughness by placing either a 2-meter straight edge or a 10-meter wire parallel to the average sliding direction on the discontinuity surface. The straight edge or wire must contact the highest surface points and be as straight as possible. Perpendicular offsets (y) from this reference line to the surface are measured at tangential intervals (x), typically around 2% of the total length (for example, every 5 cm on a 2 m edge). These measurements are recorded to the nearest millimeter, producing a roughness profile that quantitatively characterizes surface irregularities affecting shear strength.
Roughness enhances the shear strength of intact, interlocked, and unfilled rock joints by providing mechanical interlock and resistance to dilation. However, as joint aperture, infilling thickness, or prior displacement increase, the impact of roughness on shear strength diminishes. Roughness is quantified using the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC), determined via compass and disc-clinometer methods or photogrammetry. Shear strength can be estimated by the equation ( \tau = \sigma_n \tan (20 \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ) ), where ( \sigma_n ) is normal stress and JCS is joint compressive strength.
For linear profiling (Clause 3.8), equipment includes a folding straight edge at least 2 meters long graduated in millimeters, a compass with a clinometer, and a 10-meter light wire or nylon cord marked with red paint at 1-meter intervals and blue paint at 10-centimeter intervals. The wire is tensioned between wooden blocks to form a reference line. The compass-disc clinometer method (Clause 3.9) requires a geological compass with a horizontal leveling bubble and a rotatable lid connected by a graduated hinge for dip measurements, along with four light alloy circular plates of diameters 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, and 40 cm.
Photogrammetry employs terrestrial stereoscopic photography to capture coordinates of points on inaccessible discontinuity surfaces. Using stereoscopic plotting instruments or stereo comparators, these coordinates are recorded and processed to create contour maps or roughness profiles, preferably aligned with the sliding direction. Typical contour intervals range from 1 mm to 5 cm depending on camera setup. Photographic documentation includes minimum, modal, and maximum roughness with a visible 1-meter scale. Statistical analysis of these data allows estimation of shear strength and dilation characteristics without direct contact.
Weathering significantly reduces the residual friction angle (( \phi_r )) of rock discontinuities. Unweathered rock surfaces typically have residual friction angles between 25° and 35°, commonly around 30°. In contrast, heavily weathered surfaces can have ( \phi_r ) reduced to approximately 15°, even when clay fillings are absent. This reduction occurs because weathering weakens surface hardness and interlocking capacity. The effect can be estimated in the field using Schmidt hammer rebound values by the relation ( \phi_r = \phi_{unweathered} \times \frac{r}{r + r_0} ), where ( r ) and ( r_0 ) are rebound values on weathered and unweathered surfaces respectively.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 PART 4. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required