The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 5 outlines a standardized approach for quantitatively assessing the compressive strength of discontinuity walls within rock masses. It provides guidelines for field evaluations using tools such as the Schmidt hammer and manual index tests, while accounting for influences like weathering and rock density. This code is vital for professionals engaged in rock mass assessment for civil, mining, and geotechnical projects.
Overview
The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 5 outlines a standardized approach for quantitatively assessing the compressive strength of discontinuity walls within rock masses. It provides guidelines for field evaluations using tools such as the Schmidt hammer and manual index tests, while accounting for influences like weathering and rock density. This code is vital for professionals engaged in rock mass assessment for civil, mining, and geotechnical projects.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Scope Overview: Defines the classification system for weathering states of rock masses and rock materials, and methods for evaluating rock strength for engineering applications.
Weathering State of Rock Mass (Table 1):
| Term | Description | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh | No visible signs of weathering; minor discoloration at discontinuities | I |
| Moderately weathered | Less than 50% decomposed; presence of fresh and discoloured rock cores | III |
| Highly weathered | More than 50% decomposed; discontinuous rock framework | IV |
| Completely weathered | Fully decomposed; original structure largely preserved | V |
| Residual soil | Total conversion to soil; fabric destroyed; volume changes evident | VI |
Weathering State of Rock Material (Table 2):
| Term | Description |
|---|---|
| Fresh | No visible weathering |
| Discoloured | Colour changes; specify affected minerals and degree |
| Decomposed | Weathered to soil; fabric intact with mineral grain decomposition |
| Disintegrated | Weathered to soil; friable fabric; mineral grains intact |
Manual Index Strength Classification (Table 3):
| Grade | Description | Field Identification | Approximate UCS (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1-S6 | Soft to hard clays | Penetration varies (fist to thumb) | <0.025 to >0.50 |
| R0-R6 | Extremely weak to strong rock | Indentation/fracture by hammer/knife | 0.25 to >250 |
Schmidt Hammer Rebound Numbers & Corrections:
Weathering States of Rock Mass (Table 1):
| Term | Description | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh | No obvious weathering; slight discoloration on major discontinuities | I |
| Moderately weathered | Less than half decomposed; fresh or discoloured rock forming core stones | III |
| Highly weathered | More than half decomposed; discontinuous core or framework stones | IV |
| Completely weathered | Entirely decomposed; original rock mass structure largely intact | V |
| Residual soil | Rock entirely converted to soil; fabric destroyed; volume altered | VI |
Weathering States of Rock Material (Table 2):
| Term | Description |
|---|---|
| Fresh | No visible signs of weathering |
| Discoloured | Colour change observed; specify affected minerals and extent |
| Decomposed | Weathered to soil with fabric intact but mineral grains decomposed |
| Disintegrated | Weathered to soil; friable fabric; mineral grains intact |
Manual Index Strength Classification (Table 3):
| Grade | Description | Field Identification | Approximate UCS (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Very soft clay | Penetrated by fist | <0.025 |
| S2 | Soft clay | Penetrated by thumb | 0.025–0.05 |
| S3 | Firm clay | Penetrated by thumb with effort | 0.05–0.10 |
| S4 | Stiff clay | Indented by thumb | 0.10–0.25 |
| S5 | Very stiff clay | Indented by thumb-nail | 0.25–0.50 |
| S6 | Hard clay | Indented with difficulty by thumb-nail | >0.50 |
| R0 | Extremely weak rock | Indented by thumb-nail | 0.25–1.0 |
Key Influences on Rock Wall Strength (IS 11315 Part 5):
Reference Tables:
| Weathering Grade | Typical Strength Level |
|---|---|
| Fresh | Highest |
| Slightly weathered | Moderate |
| Highly weathered | Low |
| Rock Material Type | Strength Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Igneous | Generally high strength |
| Sedimentary | Moderate strength |
| Metamorphic | Variable, depending on alteration |
Strength Testing Methods:
Typical Strength Estimation Equation: [ \sigma_c = k \times R ] Where:
Summary: Wall strength depends primarily on weathering degree, rock type, and test indices from manual and Schmidt hammer methods.
Required Instruments and Methods (IS 11315 Part 5, Clause 3.7):
Usage Notes:
Typical Correlation: [ \text{UCS} = f(\text{Corrected Rebound Number}) ]
This systematic approach ensures consistent and reproducible rock wall strength assessments.
Test Methodology and Data Recording Highlights (IS 11315 Part 5):
Weathering Classifications:
| Weathering Grade | Description | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh | No weathering visible | I |
| Moderately weathered | Less than 50% decomposed | III |
| Highly weathered | More than 50% decomposed | IV |
| Completely weathered | Fully decomposed but structure intact | V |
| Residual soil | All converted to soil, structure destroyed | VI |
Manual Index Strength (Table 3):
| Grade | Description | Identification | UCS Range (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| R0 | Extremely weak rock | Indented by thumb-nail | 0.25 - 1.0 |
| R1 | Very weak rock | Crumbles under hammer blows | 1.0 - 5.0 |
| R2 | Weak rock | Difficult peeling by knife | 5.0 - 25 |
| R3 | Medium strong rock | Fractured by single hammer blow | 25 - 50 |
Data Processing & Strength Estimation (IS 11315 Part 5):
Estimation Formula for Joint Compressive Strength (JCS):
Illustration: For example, a rock classified as "medium strong" (R3) with fractured surface by hammer can have UCS approximately 25–50 MPa.
This methodology enables practical and reliable wall strength estimation.
Guidelines for Presenting Test Results (IS 11315 Part 5):
Weathering Classification of Rock Mass (Table 1):
| Term | Description | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh | No visible weathering; slight discontinuity staining | I |
| Moderately weathered | Less than 50% decomposed; fresh rock present | III |
| Highly weathered | More than 50% decomposed; discontinuous framework | IV |
| Completely weathered | Fully decomposed; structure mostly intact | V |
| Residual soil | Converted entirely to soil; fabric destroyed | VI |
Rock Material Weathering (Table 2):
| Term | Description |
|---|---|
| Fresh | No weathering visible |
| Discoloured | Colour changed; specify minerals affected |
| Decomposed | Weathered with fabric intact; minerals decomposed |
| Disintegrated | Weathered; friable rock; mineral grains intact |
Manual Index Strength (Table 3):
| Grade | Description | Field ID | UCS Approx. (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1-S6 | Clays (soft to hard) | Penetration varies (fist/thumb/nail) | <0.5 to >0.5 |
| R0-R6 | Rock strength levels | Indented/fractured by hammer/knife | 0.25 to >250 |
Schmidt Hammer Test Notes:
Limitations and Precautions in Field Testing (IS 11315 Part 5):
Schmidt Hammer Rebound Correction Table (Excerpt):
| Rebound (r) | Vertical Down (-90°) | -45° | Horizontal (0°) | +45° | Vertical Up (+90°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0 | -0.8 | -3.2 | - | - |
| 20 | 0 | -0.9 | -3.4 | -6.9 | -8.8 |
| 30 | 0 | -0.8 | -3.1 | -6.2 | -7.8 |
| 40 | 0 | -0.7 | -2.7 | -5.3 | -6.6 |
| 50 | 0 | -0.6 | -2.2 | -4.3 | -5.3 |
| 60 | 0 | -0.4 | -1.7 | -3.3 | -4.0 |
This highlights the need for careful interpretation and complementary geological assessments.
Reference Summaries for IS 11315 Part 5 (1987):
These references form the backbone for standardized rock wall strength evaluation.
IS 11315 Part 5 includes annexures and conversion charts to aid in test result interpretation and unit conversions.
Annexures typically provide:
Conversion Tables cover:
Typical conversion factors:
| Quantity | From Unit | To Unit | Conversion Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure/Stress | psi | MPa | 0.006895 |
| Length | inch | mm | 25.4 |
| Weight | lb | kg | 0.4536 |
| Volume | ft³ | m³ | 0.02832 |
Common strength conversion formula: [ f_{c,28} = f_{c,t} \times \frac{f_{c,28,ref}}{f_{c,t,ref}} ] Where (f_{c,28}) is strength at 28 days, and (f_{c,t}) is strength at age t.
For detailed annexure content, consult the full IS document.
Frequently Asked
The Schmidt hammer should be applied perpendicular to the discontinuity wall surface, ideally on saturated rock for conservative strength estimates; if dry, this must be noted. The test area must be free from loose particles. When thin mineral coatings are present, testing is performed on the coating surface, with mineralogy and coating extent documented. Multiple rebound readings are taken, and the average of the highest five values is used. Corrections to rebound numbers are applied depending on hammer orientation, with vertical downward as the standard. This method helps estimate the joint wall compressive strength (JCS), essential for shear strength calculations involving joint roughness.
Weathering notably diminishes the compressive strength of rock walls, especially at discontinuities. As weathering progresses from fresh rock (Grade I) to residual soil (Grade VI), strength decreases significantly. Fresh rock exhibits high strength (often above 50 MPa), while highly weathered or residual soil conditions reduce strength to very low levels (below 1 MPa). The weakening is primarily due to decomposition and disintegration of the rock mass fabric, which affects the wall more than the intact rock core.
Evaluation requires a pointed geological hammer, a sharp pen knife or equivalent for manual index tests, and an L-type Schmidt hammer along with manufacturer-provided correction tables and a conversion graph to estimate uniaxial compressive strength. Additionally, equipment to measure dry density of rock samples is needed, including an oven, a balance, a pycnometer, and beakers. Manual index tests on freshly broken rock pieces are preferred for accuracy, and pocket penetrometers may be used for cohesive soils.
Rebound values (r) are first averaged from multiple tests, typically using the mean of the highest five readings. If the hammer orientation is other than vertical downward, corrections from Table 4 are applied. The corrected rebound number, together with the rock's dry density, is then used with a correlation graph (Fig. 1 in the standard) to estimate the joint wall compressive strength (JCS) in megapascals. This process accounts for weathering effects that usually reduce JCS to approximately 25% of the intact rock strength.
In loose or heavily fractured rock masses, discontinuities predominantly govern mechanical behavior, making direct strength measurements less representative. The thin skin of wall rock or mineral coatings, which control shear strength, are difficult to test accurately using conventional methods. Obtaining fresh, representative samples for manual index tests is challenging. Schmidt hammer and manual index tests provide approximate strength values but may not capture variability due to weathering or alteration. Conventional laboratory tests on rock cylinders are unsuitable for assessing thin wall skins or coatings. Therefore, field test results should be interpreted in conjunction with detailed geological assessments to ensure reliability.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 PART 5. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required