IS 11315 PART 51987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses, Part 5: Wall strength
1987 Edition

The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 5 outlines a standardized approach for quantitatively assessing the compressive strength of discontinuity walls within rock masses. It provides guidelines for field evaluations using tools such as the Schmidt hammer and manual index tests, while accounting for influences like weathering and rock density. This code is vital for professionals engaged in rock mass assessment for civil, mining, and geotechnical projects.

10Sections
110Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 pdf free download, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 free download pdf, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987:1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 (1987) PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 1987 edition PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-wall-strength-1987 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 5 outlines a standardized approach for quantitatively assessing the compressive strength of discontinuity walls within rock masses. It provides guidelines for field evaluations using tools such as the Schmidt hammer and manual index tests, while accounting for influences like weathering and rock density. This code is vital for professionals engaged in rock mass assessment for civil, mining, and geotechnical projects.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical specialists
  • Rock mechanics professionals
  • Civil engineering practitioners
  • Mining sector engineers
  • Geologists
  • Structural design engineers
  • Construction management personnel

Key Topics Covered

Quantitative assessment of rock wall compressive strength
Application of Schmidt hammer rebound testing
Impact of weathering and alteration on rock strength
Manual index testing for strength estimation
Preparation and testing procedures for rock surfaces
Interpreting rebound values alongside rock density
Estimating joint wall compressive strength (JCS)
Sampling and testing protocols for rock discontinuities
Effect of mineral coatings on shear strength
Standards for data presentation and reporting
Limitations of field tests in loose or fractured rock masses
Calibration of field measurements against laboratory results

Table of Contents

1Scope and Classification Criteria

Scope Overview: Defines the classification system for weathering states of rock masses and rock materials, and methods for evaluating rock strength for engineering applications.


Weathering State of Rock Mass (Table 1):

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible signs of weathering; minor discoloration at discontinuitiesI
Moderately weatheredLess than 50% decomposed; presence of fresh and discoloured rock coresIII
Highly weatheredMore than 50% decomposed; discontinuous rock frameworkIV
Completely weatheredFully decomposed; original structure largely preservedV
Residual soilTotal conversion to soil; fabric destroyed; volume changes evidentVI

Weathering State of Rock Material (Table 2):

TermDescription
FreshNo visible weathering
DiscolouredColour changes; specify affected minerals and degree
DecomposedWeathered to soil; fabric intact with mineral grain decomposition
DisintegratedWeathered to soil; friable fabric; mineral grains intact

Manual Index Strength Classification (Table 3):

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApproximate UCS (MPa)
S1-S6Soft to hard claysPenetration varies (fist to thumb)<0.025 to >0.50
R0-R6Extremely weak to strong rockIndentation/fracture by hammer/knife0.25 to >250

Schmidt Hammer Rebound Numbers & Corrections:

  • Rebound numbers range from 10 (weak rock) to 60 (very strong rock).
  • Standard application is vertical downward; corrections apply for other orientations (see Table 4).
2Terminology and Definitions

Principal Terms and Definitions (IS 11315 Part 5 - 1987)

Weathering States of Rock Mass (Table 1):

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo obvious weathering; slight discoloration on major discontinuitiesI
Moderately weatheredLess than half decomposed; fresh or discoloured rock forming core stonesIII
Highly weatheredMore than half decomposed; discontinuous core or framework stonesIV
Completely weatheredEntirely decomposed; original rock mass structure largely intactV
Residual soilRock entirely converted to soil; fabric destroyed; volume alteredVI

Weathering States of Rock Material (Table 2):

TermDescription
FreshNo visible signs of weathering
DiscolouredColour change observed; specify affected minerals and extent
DecomposedWeathered to soil with fabric intact but mineral grains decomposed
DisintegratedWeathered to soil; friable fabric; mineral grains intact

Manual Index Strength Classification (Table 3):

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApproximate UCS (MPa)
S1Very soft clayPenetrated by fist<0.025
S2Soft clayPenetrated by thumb0.025–0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated by thumb with effort0.05–0.10
S4Stiff clayIndented by thumb0.10–0.25
S5Very stiff clayIndented by thumb-nail0.25–0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumb-nail>0.50
R0Extremely weak rockIndented by thumb-nail0.25–1.0
3Influencing Factors on Wall Strength

Key Influences on Rock Wall Strength (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Weathering and alteration processes considerably diminish strength.
  • Strength is influenced by rock mass continuity and intrinsic rock material properties.

Reference Tables:

Weathering GradeTypical Strength Level
FreshHighest
Slightly weatheredModerate
Highly weatheredLow
Rock Material TypeStrength Characteristics
IgneousGenerally high strength
SedimentaryModerate strength
MetamorphicVariable, depending on alteration

Strength Testing Methods:

  • Manual index tests provide uniaxial strength estimates.
  • Schmidt hammer rebound correlates with compressive strength (non-destructive testing).

Typical Strength Estimation Equation: [ \sigma_c = k \times R ] Where:

  • (\sigma_c) = compressive strength
  • (R) = Schmidt hammer rebound number
  • (k) = empirical calibration constant

Summary: Wall strength depends primarily on weathering degree, rock type, and test indices from manual and Schmidt hammer methods.

4Testing Equipment and Procedures

Required Instruments and Methods (IS 11315 Part 5, Clause 3.7):

  • Geological hammer with pointed tip.
  • Sharp knife or pen knife for manual index tests.
  • L-type Schmidt hammer with manufacturer-supplied correction tables and strength conversion graph (Fig. 1).
  • Equipment for measuring dry density of rock samples: oven, weighing balance, pycnometer, beakers.

Usage Notes:

  • Schmidt hammer rebound values must be corrected for hammer orientation.
  • Manual index tests are preferred on fresh, hand-sized rock samples.
  • All results should be rounded as per IS 2-1960.

Typical Correlation: [ \text{UCS} = f(\text{Corrected Rebound Number}) ]

This systematic approach ensures consistent and reproducible rock wall strength assessments.

5Test Protocols and Data Acquisition

Test Methodology and Data Recording Highlights (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Adhere to IS 2-1960 for rounding off test results.
  • Schmidt hammer testing involves measuring rebound numbers on discontinuity walls, including surfaces with mineral coatings.
  • Rebound number ranges approximately 10 (weak rock) to 60 (strong rock), with corrections for non-vertical hammering.

Weathering Classifications:

Weathering GradeDescriptionGrade
FreshNo weathering visibleI
Moderately weatheredLess than 50% decomposedIII
Highly weatheredMore than 50% decomposedIV
Completely weatheredFully decomposed but structure intactV
Residual soilAll converted to soil, structure destroyedVI

Manual Index Strength (Table 3):

GradeDescriptionIdentificationUCS Range (MPa)
R0Extremely weak rockIndented by thumb-nail0.25 - 1.0
R1Very weak rockCrumbles under hammer blows1.0 - 5.0
R2Weak rockDifficult peeling by knife5.0 - 25
R3Medium strong rockFractured by single hammer blow25 - 50
6Data Interpretation and Strength Calculation

Data Processing & Strength Estimation (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Rock mass weathering grades range from fresh (I) to residual soil (VI).
  • Rock material weathering states: fresh, discoloured, decomposed, disintegrated.
  • Manual index tests classify strength from soft clay to extremely strong rock.
  • Schmidt hammer (L-type) rebound numbers combined with dry density and correction tables estimate UCS.

Estimation Formula for Joint Compressive Strength (JCS):

  • Calculated from mean rebound number and rock density using correlation graphs.

Illustration: For example, a rock classified as "medium strong" (R3) with fractured surface by hammer can have UCS approximately 25–50 MPa.

This methodology enables practical and reliable wall strength estimation.

7Result Reporting and Documentation

Guidelines for Presenting Test Results (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Final strength values should be rounded according to IS 2:1960.

Weathering Classification of Rock Mass (Table 1):

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weathering; slight discontinuity stainingI
Moderately weatheredLess than 50% decomposed; fresh rock presentIII
Highly weatheredMore than 50% decomposed; discontinuous frameworkIV
Completely weatheredFully decomposed; structure mostly intactV
Residual soilConverted entirely to soil; fabric destroyedVI

Rock Material Weathering (Table 2):

TermDescription
FreshNo weathering visible
DiscolouredColour changed; specify minerals affected
DecomposedWeathered with fabric intact; minerals decomposed
DisintegratedWeathered; friable rock; mineral grains intact

Manual Index Strength (Table 3):

GradeDescriptionField IDUCS Approx. (MPa)
S1-S6Clays (soft to hard)Penetration varies (fist/thumb/nail)<0.5 to >0.5
R0-R6Rock strength levelsIndented/fractured by hammer/knife0.25 to >250

Schmidt Hammer Test Notes:

  • Rebound number ranges from 10 to 60.
  • Use vertical downward hits for standard reading.
  • Apply corrections for other hammer orientations.
8Constraints and Considerations

Limitations and Precautions in Field Testing (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Thin mineral coatings (e.g., calcite, chlorite, talc) affect rebound readings; tests on coatings must be documented.
  • Rebound values vary with hammer orientation; vertical downward is baseline, others require correction.
  • Weathering can reduce joint wall compressive strength to about 25% of intact rock strength.
  • Loose or fractured rock masses pose challenges; tests may not represent actual strength due to discontinuities.

Schmidt Hammer Rebound Correction Table (Excerpt):

Rebound (r)Vertical Down (-90°)-45°Horizontal (0°)+45°Vertical Up (+90°)
100-0.8-3.2--
200-0.9-3.4-6.9-8.8
300-0.8-3.1-6.2-7.8
400-0.7-2.7-5.3-6.6
500-0.6-2.2-4.3-5.3
600-0.4-1.7-3.3-4.0

This highlights the need for careful interpretation and complementary geological assessments.

9Supporting References

Reference Summaries for IS 11315 Part 5 (1987):

  • Weathering classifications for rock mass and rock material (Tables 1 and 2).
  • Manual index strength classification for soils and rocks (Table 3).
  • Schmidt hammer testing procedures, rebound ranges, and correction guidelines (Clause 4.4.5, Fig. 1).

These references form the backbone for standardized rock wall strength evaluation.

10Annexures and Conversion Tables

IS 11315 Part 5 includes annexures and conversion charts to aid in test result interpretation and unit conversions.

Annexures typically provide:

  • Sample calculation procedures.
  • Standard formats for reporting.
  • Graphs/charts for quick reference.

Conversion Tables cover:

  • Unit conversions, e.g., psi to MPa, lb/ft³ to kg/m³.
  • Strength equivalence for different curing durations.
  • Aggregate sizing conversions.

Typical conversion factors:

QuantityFrom UnitTo UnitConversion Factor
Pressure/StresspsiMPa0.006895
Lengthinchmm25.4
Weightlbkg0.4536
Volumeft³0.02832

Common strength conversion formula: [ f_{c,28} = f_{c,t} \times \frac{f_{c,28,ref}}{f_{c,t,ref}} ] Where (f_{c,28}) is strength at 28 days, and (f_{c,t}) is strength at age t.

For detailed annexure content, consult the full IS document.

Popular Questions About IS 11315 PART 5

?What is the recommended procedure for using the Schmidt hammer on rock discontinuity walls?

The Schmidt hammer should be applied perpendicular to the discontinuity wall surface, ideally on saturated rock for conservative strength estimates; if dry, this must be noted. The test area must be free from loose particles. When thin mineral coatings are present, testing is performed on the coating surface, with mineralogy and coating extent documented. Multiple rebound readings are taken, and the average of the highest five values is used. Corrections to rebound numbers are applied depending on hammer orientation, with vertical downward as the standard. This method helps estimate the joint wall compressive strength (JCS), essential for shear strength calculations involving joint roughness.

?How does weathering affect the compressive strength of rock walls according to this standard?

Weathering notably diminishes the compressive strength of rock walls, especially at discontinuities. As weathering progresses from fresh rock (Grade I) to residual soil (Grade VI), strength decreases significantly. Fresh rock exhibits high strength (often above 50 MPa), while highly weathered or residual soil conditions reduce strength to very low levels (below 1 MPa). The weakening is primarily due to decomposition and disintegration of the rock mass fabric, which affects the wall more than the intact rock core.

?What equipment is necessary to perform the wall strength evaluation as per IS 11315 Part 5?

Evaluation requires a pointed geological hammer, a sharp pen knife or equivalent for manual index tests, and an L-type Schmidt hammer along with manufacturer-provided correction tables and a conversion graph to estimate uniaxial compressive strength. Additionally, equipment to measure dry density of rock samples is needed, including an oven, a balance, a pycnometer, and beakers. Manual index tests on freshly broken rock pieces are preferred for accuracy, and pocket penetrometers may be used for cohesive soils.

?How are rebound values from Schmidt hammer tests converted to joint wall compressive strength?

Rebound values (r) are first averaged from multiple tests, typically using the mean of the highest five readings. If the hammer orientation is other than vertical downward, corrections from Table 4 are applied. The corrected rebound number, together with the rock's dry density, is then used with a correlation graph (Fig. 1 in the standard) to estimate the joint wall compressive strength (JCS) in megapascals. This process accounts for weathering effects that usually reduce JCS to approximately 25% of the intact rock strength.

?What are the limitations of field testing methods for rock wall strength in loose or heavily fractured rock masses?

In loose or heavily fractured rock masses, discontinuities predominantly govern mechanical behavior, making direct strength measurements less representative. The thin skin of wall rock or mineral coatings, which control shear strength, are difficult to test accurately using conventional methods. Obtaining fresh, representative samples for manual index tests is challenging. Schmidt hammer and manual index tests provide approximate strength values but may not capture variability due to weathering or alteration. Conventional laboratory tests on rock cylinders are unsuitable for assessing thin wall skins or coatings. Therefore, field test results should be interpreted in conjunction with detailed geological assessments to ensure reliability.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 PART 5. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required