IS 11315 PART 21987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in the rock mass, Part 2: Spacing
1987 Edition

The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 2 establishes a uniform approach for the quantitative assessment of spacing between discontinuities within rock masses. It equips engineers and geologists with techniques to measure, document, and statistically analyze the intervals between adjacent fractures, which significantly influence the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of rock formations. This guideline is crucial for professionals engaged in rock mechanics, geotechnical evaluations, and foundation design to evaluate rock stability and fluid flow.

6Sections
79Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 pdf free download, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 free download pdf, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987:1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987-1987 PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 (1987) PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 1987 edition PDF, quantitative-method-for-rock-mass-discontinuity-spacing-1987 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 2 establishes a uniform approach for the quantitative assessment of spacing between discontinuities within rock masses. It equips engineers and geologists with techniques to measure, document, and statistically analyze the intervals between adjacent fractures, which significantly influence the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of rock formations. This guideline is crucial for professionals engaged in rock mechanics, geotechnical evaluations, and foundation design to evaluate rock stability and fluid flow.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineering Professionals
  • Specialists in Rock Mechanics
  • Civil Engineering Practitioners
  • Mining Engineering Experts
  • Geologists
  • Foundation Design Engineers
  • Hydrogeology Specialists

Key Topics Covered

Meaning and importance of discontinuity spacing
Techniques for measuring spacing with tape, compass, and clinometer
Statistical representation of spacing data through histograms
Categorization of spacing from very close to very wide
Determination of modal, minimum, and maximum spacing values
Frequency of discontinuities expressed as the inverse of spacing
Effect of spacing on rock block dimensions and mechanical properties
Impact of spacing on rock mass permeability and seepage characteristics
Adjustment for directional measurement bias
Application of drill core and borehole methods to estimate spacing
Correlation between seismic velocity and discontinuity frequency
Exclusion criteria for blast-induced fractures in spacing analyses

Table of Contents

1Scope and Definitions

Overview & Principal Specifications from IS 11315 Part 2 (1987):

  • Objective: Describes standardized procedures to quantify and depict spacing of rock discontinuities such as joints and fractures.

  • Spacing Categories (Clause 5.1):

CategorySpacing Range (S)
Very closeLess than 60 mm
CloseBetween 60 mm and 200 mm
ModerateBetween 200 mm and 600 mm
WideBetween 600 mm and 2000 mm
Very wideGreater than 2000 mm
  • Modal Spacing Calculation (Clause 4.4): The modal spacing ( S_m ) is derived from measured distances ( d_m ) and represented using histograms (refer Fig. 2).
    Note: Precision measurement with tape and compass is recommended; experienced geologists may rely on visual estimation.

  • Measurement Considerations:

    • Exclude fractures caused by blasting.
    • Display variation in spacing using block diagrams or histograms.
    • Where surface exposures are insufficient, seismic refraction or borehole methods may estimate spacing.
flowchart LR
    A[Exposed Rock Surface] --> B[Measure Spacing of Discontinuities]
    B --> C[Document Minimum, Modal, and Maximum Spacing]
    C --> D[Classify Spacing (Very Close to Very Wide)]
    D --> E[Visualize Results via Histograms or Block Diagrams]
    E --> F[Use Data for Rock Mass Evaluation]

Summary: This standard ensures uniform measurement, classification, and representation of discontinuity spacing to support rock mass evaluation in engineering.

2References and Classification Details

Primary References and Specifications in IS 11315 Part 2

1. Classification of Spacing (Clause 5.1, Table 5)

CategorySpacing Range (S)
Very close< 60 mm
Close60 to 200 mm
Moderate200 to 600 mm
Wide600 to 2000 mm
Very wide> 2000 mm
  • Record minimum (S_min), modal (S), and maximum (S_max) spacing for each set of discontinuities.
  • Present frequency distributions in histogram form (see Fig. 2).

2. Importance of Spacing (Clause 3.3)

  • Spacing significantly influences rock mass deformation potential.
  • A combination of low shear strength, multiple joint sets, and suitable spacing increases likelihood of slip and deformation.

3. Terminology (Clause 2.1)

  • Terms conform to definitions in IS 11358-1986.

Visual Summary: Discontinuity Spacing Categories

graph LR
    A[Discontinuity Spacing] --> B[Very Close (< 60 mm)]
    A --> C[Close (60-200 mm)]
    A --> D[Moderate (200-600 mm)]
    A --> E[Wide (600-2000 mm)]
    A --> F[Very Wide (> 2000 mm)]

Note: These categories aid in assessing rock mass behavior and deformation risk in structural engineering.

3Relevance of Discontinuity Spacing in Rock Masses

Importance of Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)

  • Spacing denotes the interval between adjacent discontinuities (e.g., joints, fractures).
  • Per Clause 3.3, spacing is crucial in scenarios involving:
    • Low shear strength materials.
    • Presence of multiple joint sets allowing slip or deformation.
  • Reduced spacing results in a higher number of discontinuities, weakening the rock mass.
  • Increased spacing corresponds to behavior dominated by intact rock.

Highlights:

  • Spacing directly affects rock mass strength and deformability.
  • It is fundamental for anticipating mechanical behavior and structural design.
  • Measurements must be precise and rounded according to IS guidelines.

Typical Parameters:

ParameterExplanation
( S )Mean distance between discontinuities
( n )Number of discontinuities per unit length ( ( n = 1/S ) )
Joint setsNumber and spatial orientation of discontinuity groups

Formula:

[ S = \frac{L}{N} ] where:

  • ( L ) = measured length along rock mass
  • ( N ) = count of discontinuities within ( L )

flowchart LR
    A[Rock Mass] --> B[Discontinuities]
    B --> C[Spacing (S)]
    C --> D[Mechanical Properties]
    D --> E{Influence of Shear Strength and Joint Sets}
    E --> F[Risk of Deformation]

Summary: Accurate quantification of spacing is essential for evaluating rock stability and guiding geotechnical design.

4Procedure for Measuring Discontinuity Spacing

Measurement Protocol for Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)

  • Positioning the Tape (Clause 4.1): Place the measuring tape approximately perpendicular to the discontinuity set on the rock outcrop to record spacing ( S ). If tape is not perfectly perpendicular, apply correction for directional bias.

  • Spacing Categories (Clause 5.1):

CategorySpacing ( S )
Very closeLess than 60 mm
Close60 to 200 mm
Moderate200 to 600 mm
Wide600 to 2000 mm
Very wideGreater than 2000 mm
  • Calculation of Modal Spacing (Clause 4.4): Determine the most frequent spacing ( S_{modal} ) from collected measurements ( d_m ). Display the data as histograms (see Fig. 2), including minimum, modal, and maximum values.

  • Additional Guidelines:

    • Omit any fractures resulting from blasting.
    • Modal spacing averages can estimate typical rock block size assuming persistence.
    • When surface data is insufficient, use seismic refraction or borehole methods to estimate spacing.
  • Rounding Off: Follow IS:2-1960 standards for rounding values.

flowchart LR
    A[Measure spacing with tape] --> B{Is tape perpendicular?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Record distances between discontinuities]
    B -- No --> D[Apply correction for directional bias]
    D --> C
    C --> E[Calculate modal spacing \( S_{modal} \)]
    E --> F[Assign spacing categories]
    F --> G[Present histograms of spacing]

This methodology ensures standardized, precise measurement and reporting according to IS 11315 Part 2.

5Guidelines for Presenting Measurement Results

Presentation of Discontinuity Spacing Data per IS 11315 Part 2


Core Specifications:

  • Spacing Classifications (Clause 5.1):
CategorySpacing Range (S)
Very closeUnder 60 mm
Close60 to 200 mm
Moderate200 to 600 mm
Wide600 to 2000 mm
Very wideAbove 2000 mm

Critical Formulas:

  • Modal spacing ( S_m ) is the most frequent spacing value identified (Clause 4.4):

[ S_m = d_m ]

where ( d_m ) is the modal value of measured spacing distribution.

  • The mean block dimension can be approximated by the average of modal spacings ( S_1, S_2, \ldots ) assuming block persistence.

Visualization Techniques:

  • Construct histograms for each discontinuity set illustrating frequency distribution (see Fig. 2).
  • Overlay frequency distribution curves to highlight modal values and spread.
  • For data sets with multiple or unclear modes, average spacing may be used instead of modal spacing.

Additional Notes:

  • Exclude fractures caused by blasting activities.
  • Use measuring tape and compass for accuracy; visual estimation is permitted for skilled practitioners.
  • When outcrop data is limited, apply seismic refraction or borehole-based approaches for spacing estimation.

Example Diagram (Histogram):

barChart
    title Discontinuity Spacing Frequency Histogram
    x-axis Spacing (mm)
    y-axis Frequency
    VeryClose <60 : 15
    Close 60-200 : 30
    Moderate 200-600 : 40
    Wide 600-2000 : 10
    VeryWide >2000 : 5

This presentation method facilitates clear and consistent reporting of discontinuity spacing for rock mass characterization in accordance with IS 11315 Part 2.

6Measurement and Interpretation Considerations

Notes on Measuring and Interpreting Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)


Terminology of Spacing Categories (Clause 5.1)

CategorySpacing Range (S)
Very closeBelow 60 mm
Close60 to 200 mm
Moderate200 to 600 mm
Wide600 to 2000 mm
Very wideOver 2000 mm

Modal Spacing Calculation (Clause 4.4)

[ S_{modal} = d_m ]

  • ( d_m ) represents the most frequently observed distance.
  • Modal spacing is best illustrated using histograms to clarify distribution.

Guidelines for Presenting Results (Clause 5.2)

  • Utilize histograms for each discontinuity set.
  • Plot frequency curves on the same graph to compare sets.
  • Average spacing may substitute modal spacing when data contains multiple or ambiguous modes.

Additional Notes

  • Employ measuring tape and compass for precise readings (Note 1).
  • Average modal spacing approximates typical rock block dimensions (Note 2).
  • Exclude fractures related to blasting (Note 4).
  • When exposure is limited, estimate spacing using seismic refraction or borehole techniques (Notes 5 & 6).

Conceptual Visualization (Histogram)

graph LR
A[Discontinuity Set] --> B[Spacing Measurements]
B --> C[Histogram Display]
C --> D[Modal Spacing (d_m)]
C --> E[Minimum Spacing (S_min)]
C --> F[Maximum Spacing (S_max)]

This approach ensures uniformity in measuring, interpreting, and presenting discontinuity spacing data consistent with IS 11315 Part 2 standards.

Popular Questions About IS 11315 PART 2

?What is the procedure for measuring discontinuity spacing as outlined in IS 11315 Part 2?

Per IS 11315 Part 2 (1987), Clause 3.5, discontinuity spacing is determined by measuring the perpendicular distance between adjacent discontinuities. A measuring tape with a minimum length of 3 meters, calibrated in millimeters, should be employed for accuracy. To guarantee perpendicularity, a compass and clinometer are used to measure the angle between the tape and the discontinuity set. The true spacing ( S ) is calculated using the formula:

[ S = L \times \cos \theta ]

where ( L ) is the tape length measured between discontinuities and ( \theta ) is the angle between the tape and the discontinuity set obtained via clinometer. This method ensures precise perpendicular spacing for rock mass discontinuity analysis.

?How does the standard classify the ranges of discontinuity spacing?

According to IS 11315 Part 2, Clause 5.1, discontinuity spacing is categorized as follows:

ClassificationSpacing Range (S)
Very close spacingLess than 60 mm
Close spacing60 to 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 to 600 mm
Wide spacing600 to 2000 mm
Very wide spacingGreater than 2000 mm

Measurements should be conducted with a tape of at least 3 meters in length, calibrated in millimeters, and the angle between tape and discontinuity should be recorded using a compass and clinometer. These classifications assist in characterizing rock masses and aid engineering design decisions.

?In what way does discontinuity spacing influence the mechanical behavior of rock masses?

IS 11315 Part 2 explains that discontinuity spacing governs the size of rock blocks, which in turn affects mechanical behavior. Wide spacing results in larger, interlocked blocks with higher cohesion, typically leading to translational sliding failure modes (Clause 3.1). Closer spacing produces smaller blocks with lower cohesion, which may result in circular or flow-like failures such as rotation or rolling of fragments (Clause 3.2). When spacing is exceptionally close, block orientation has less influence on failure mode. The effect of spacing on mechanical behavior becomes more pronounced when shear strength is low and multiple joint sets are present, increasing the possibility of slip and deformation (Clause 3.3). Accurate spacing measurement is therefore imperative for anticipating rock mass response and failure mechanisms.

?Is it possible to estimate discontinuity spacing using drill core or seismic methods according to the standard?

Yes, IS 11315 Part 2 permits estimation of spacing from drill core and seismic approaches where surface measurements are limited. Clause 4.4, Note 5, states that seismic refraction, which correlates P-wave velocity with discontinuity frequency, can be used to estimate spacing in the upper 20-30 meters of rock. Clause 4.4, Note 6, indicates that borehole techniques such as drill core analysis, TV cameras, photographic tools, and periscopes can also evaluate spacing. Clause 3.5 notes that direct measurement with tape and compass is preferred when accessible. This multi-method approach enables spacing assessment in challenging environments.

?What is the recommended method to correct directional bias during discontinuity spacing measurements?

IS 11315 Part 2 requires correction for directional bias if the measuring tape is not held perpendicular to the discontinuity set (Clause 4.1). The procedure involves measuring the angle ( \theta ) between the tape and the discontinuity orientation using a compass and clinometer (Clause 3.5). The observed spacing along the tape ( d_m ) is then corrected to the true perpendicular spacing ( S ) by:

[ S = d_m \times \cos \theta ]

This correction ensures that the spacing reflects the actual perpendicular distance between discontinuities, thereby improving the accuracy of statistical analyses and block size estimations.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 PART 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required