The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 2 establishes a uniform approach for the quantitative assessment of spacing between discontinuities within rock masses. It equips engineers and geologists with techniques to measure, document, and statistically analyze the intervals between adjacent fractures, which significantly influence the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of rock formations. This guideline is crucial for professionals engaged in rock mechanics, geotechnical evaluations, and foundation design to evaluate rock stability and fluid flow.
Overview
The 1987 edition of IS 11315 Part 2 establishes a uniform approach for the quantitative assessment of spacing between discontinuities within rock masses. It equips engineers and geologists with techniques to measure, document, and statistically analyze the intervals between adjacent fractures, which significantly influence the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of rock formations. This guideline is crucial for professionals engaged in rock mechanics, geotechnical evaluations, and foundation design to evaluate rock stability and fluid flow.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Overview & Principal Specifications from IS 11315 Part 2 (1987):
Objective: Describes standardized procedures to quantify and depict spacing of rock discontinuities such as joints and fractures.
Spacing Categories (Clause 5.1):
| Category | Spacing Range (S) |
|---|---|
| Very close | Less than 60 mm |
| Close | Between 60 mm and 200 mm |
| Moderate | Between 200 mm and 600 mm |
| Wide | Between 600 mm and 2000 mm |
| Very wide | Greater than 2000 mm |
Modal Spacing Calculation (Clause 4.4):
The modal spacing ( S_m ) is derived from measured distances ( d_m ) and represented using histograms (refer Fig. 2).
Note: Precision measurement with tape and compass is recommended; experienced geologists may rely on visual estimation.
Measurement Considerations:
flowchart LR
A[Exposed Rock Surface] --> B[Measure Spacing of Discontinuities]
B --> C[Document Minimum, Modal, and Maximum Spacing]
C --> D[Classify Spacing (Very Close to Very Wide)]
D --> E[Visualize Results via Histograms or Block Diagrams]
E --> F[Use Data for Rock Mass Evaluation]
Summary: This standard ensures uniform measurement, classification, and representation of discontinuity spacing to support rock mass evaluation in engineering.
Primary References and Specifications in IS 11315 Part 2
| Category | Spacing Range (S) |
|---|---|
| Very close | < 60 mm |
| Close | 60 to 200 mm |
| Moderate | 200 to 600 mm |
| Wide | 600 to 2000 mm |
| Very wide | > 2000 mm |
graph LR
A[Discontinuity Spacing] --> B[Very Close (< 60 mm)]
A --> C[Close (60-200 mm)]
A --> D[Moderate (200-600 mm)]
A --> E[Wide (600-2000 mm)]
A --> F[Very Wide (> 2000 mm)]
Note: These categories aid in assessing rock mass behavior and deformation risk in structural engineering.
Importance of Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)
| Parameter | Explanation |
|---|---|
| ( S ) | Mean distance between discontinuities |
| ( n ) | Number of discontinuities per unit length ( ( n = 1/S ) ) |
| Joint sets | Number and spatial orientation of discontinuity groups |
[ S = \frac{L}{N} ] where:
flowchart LR
A[Rock Mass] --> B[Discontinuities]
B --> C[Spacing (S)]
C --> D[Mechanical Properties]
D --> E{Influence of Shear Strength and Joint Sets}
E --> F[Risk of Deformation]
Summary: Accurate quantification of spacing is essential for evaluating rock stability and guiding geotechnical design.
Measurement Protocol for Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)
Positioning the Tape (Clause 4.1): Place the measuring tape approximately perpendicular to the discontinuity set on the rock outcrop to record spacing ( S ). If tape is not perfectly perpendicular, apply correction for directional bias.
Spacing Categories (Clause 5.1):
| Category | Spacing ( S ) |
|---|---|
| Very close | Less than 60 mm |
| Close | 60 to 200 mm |
| Moderate | 200 to 600 mm |
| Wide | 600 to 2000 mm |
| Very wide | Greater than 2000 mm |
Calculation of Modal Spacing (Clause 4.4): Determine the most frequent spacing ( S_{modal} ) from collected measurements ( d_m ). Display the data as histograms (see Fig. 2), including minimum, modal, and maximum values.
Additional Guidelines:
Rounding Off: Follow IS:2-1960 standards for rounding values.
flowchart LR
A[Measure spacing with tape] --> B{Is tape perpendicular?}
B -- Yes --> C[Record distances between discontinuities]
B -- No --> D[Apply correction for directional bias]
D --> C
C --> E[Calculate modal spacing \( S_{modal} \)]
E --> F[Assign spacing categories]
F --> G[Present histograms of spacing]
This methodology ensures standardized, precise measurement and reporting according to IS 11315 Part 2.
Presentation of Discontinuity Spacing Data per IS 11315 Part 2
| Category | Spacing Range (S) |
|---|---|
| Very close | Under 60 mm |
| Close | 60 to 200 mm |
| Moderate | 200 to 600 mm |
| Wide | 600 to 2000 mm |
| Very wide | Above 2000 mm |
[ S_m = d_m ]
where ( d_m ) is the modal value of measured spacing distribution.
barChart
title Discontinuity Spacing Frequency Histogram
x-axis Spacing (mm)
y-axis Frequency
VeryClose <60 : 15
Close 60-200 : 30
Moderate 200-600 : 40
Wide 600-2000 : 10
VeryWide >2000 : 5
This presentation method facilitates clear and consistent reporting of discontinuity spacing for rock mass characterization in accordance with IS 11315 Part 2.
Notes on Measuring and Interpreting Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)
| Category | Spacing Range (S) |
|---|---|
| Very close | Below 60 mm |
| Close | 60 to 200 mm |
| Moderate | 200 to 600 mm |
| Wide | 600 to 2000 mm |
| Very wide | Over 2000 mm |
[ S_{modal} = d_m ]
graph LR
A[Discontinuity Set] --> B[Spacing Measurements]
B --> C[Histogram Display]
C --> D[Modal Spacing (d_m)]
C --> E[Minimum Spacing (S_min)]
C --> F[Maximum Spacing (S_max)]
This approach ensures uniformity in measuring, interpreting, and presenting discontinuity spacing data consistent with IS 11315 Part 2 standards.
Frequently Asked
Per IS 11315 Part 2 (1987), Clause 3.5, discontinuity spacing is determined by measuring the perpendicular distance between adjacent discontinuities. A measuring tape with a minimum length of 3 meters, calibrated in millimeters, should be employed for accuracy. To guarantee perpendicularity, a compass and clinometer are used to measure the angle between the tape and the discontinuity set. The true spacing ( S ) is calculated using the formula:
[ S = L \times \cos \theta ]
where ( L ) is the tape length measured between discontinuities and ( \theta ) is the angle between the tape and the discontinuity set obtained via clinometer. This method ensures precise perpendicular spacing for rock mass discontinuity analysis.
According to IS 11315 Part 2, Clause 5.1, discontinuity spacing is categorized as follows:
| Classification | Spacing Range (S) |
|---|---|
| Very close spacing | Less than 60 mm |
| Close spacing | 60 to 200 mm |
| Moderate spacing | 200 to 600 mm |
| Wide spacing | 600 to 2000 mm |
| Very wide spacing | Greater than 2000 mm |
Measurements should be conducted with a tape of at least 3 meters in length, calibrated in millimeters, and the angle between tape and discontinuity should be recorded using a compass and clinometer. These classifications assist in characterizing rock masses and aid engineering design decisions.
IS 11315 Part 2 explains that discontinuity spacing governs the size of rock blocks, which in turn affects mechanical behavior. Wide spacing results in larger, interlocked blocks with higher cohesion, typically leading to translational sliding failure modes (Clause 3.1). Closer spacing produces smaller blocks with lower cohesion, which may result in circular or flow-like failures such as rotation or rolling of fragments (Clause 3.2). When spacing is exceptionally close, block orientation has less influence on failure mode. The effect of spacing on mechanical behavior becomes more pronounced when shear strength is low and multiple joint sets are present, increasing the possibility of slip and deformation (Clause 3.3). Accurate spacing measurement is therefore imperative for anticipating rock mass response and failure mechanisms.
Yes, IS 11315 Part 2 permits estimation of spacing from drill core and seismic approaches where surface measurements are limited. Clause 4.4, Note 5, states that seismic refraction, which correlates P-wave velocity with discontinuity frequency, can be used to estimate spacing in the upper 20-30 meters of rock. Clause 4.4, Note 6, indicates that borehole techniques such as drill core analysis, TV cameras, photographic tools, and periscopes can also evaluate spacing. Clause 3.5 notes that direct measurement with tape and compass is preferred when accessible. This multi-method approach enables spacing assessment in challenging environments.
IS 11315 Part 2 requires correction for directional bias if the measuring tape is not held perpendicular to the discontinuity set (Clause 4.1). The procedure involves measuring the angle ( \theta ) between the tape and the discontinuity orientation using a compass and clinometer (Clause 3.5). The observed spacing along the tape ( d_m ) is then corrected to the true perpendicular spacing ( S ) by:
[ S = d_m \times \cos \theta ]
This correction ensures that the spacing reflects the actual perpendicular distance between discontinuities, thereby improving the accuracy of statistical analyses and block size estimations.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 PART 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required