IS sp Part 471988AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Handbook on Structures with Steel Lattice Portal Frames (Without Cranes)

IS SP Part 47 (1988) is a comprehensive handbook providing design and analysis guidelines for steel lattice portal frames without cranes. It covers structural considerations under dead, live, wind, and seismic loads, focusing on typical short and long-span frames. This standard is essential for structural engineers and designers working on steel lattice portal frame structures, ensuring safe and efficient design in compliance with Indian loading codes.

13Sections
484Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1988Edition
Functional Requirements in BuildingsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS sp Part 47 PDF, IS sp Part 47 pdf free download, IS sp Part 47 free download pdf, ISspPart47 PDF, IS-sp-Part-47 PDF, IS sp Part 47 1988 PDF, IS sp Part 47:1988 PDF, IS sp Part 47-1988 PDF, IS sp Part 47 (1988) PDF, IS sp Part 47 1988 edition PDF, IS sp Part 47 edition 1988 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS SP Part 47 (1988) is a comprehensive handbook providing design and analysis guidelines for steel lattice portal frames without cranes. It covers structural considerations under dead, live, wind, and seismic loads, focusing on typical short and long-span frames. This standard is essential for structural engineers and designers working on steel lattice portal frame structures, ensuring safe and efficient design in compliance with Indian loading codes.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Structural Engineers
  • Steel Fabricators
  • Civil Engineers
  • Architects specializing in industrial buildings
  • Construction Project Managers
  • Design Consultants
  • Academics and Researchers in Structural Engineering

Key Topics Covered

Design principles for steel lattice portal frames
Load considerations: dead, live, wind, and earthquake
Analysis of member forces under various load conditions
Frame spacing and geometry specifications
Selection and detailing of structural members and lacing
Foundation force calculations and design
Eaves beam design and connection details
Allowable stresses and load combinations
Wind load conditions including internal pressure and suction
Seismic load assessment as per IS 1893
Design examples for different spans and column heights
Development length for anchor bolts and base plate design

Table of Contents

1Scope

Detailed content not available.

2Load Considerations

Load Considerations from IS SP 47 (S&T) : 1988 & IS 875:1964

1. Live Load (I.L) Calculation (Clause 58.13):
[ \text{Live Load} = 58.13 \times \frac{2}{3} \times 6 = 232.52 \text{ kg/m} = 2350 \text{ N/m (approx.)} ]

2. Basic Wind Load (Note 3(a), IS 875:1964):
[ P = 0.75 \times 100 \times 6 = 450 \text{ kg/m} = 4500 \text{ N/m} ]


Key Wind Load & Foundation Forces Tables (Selected Extracts)

SlopeWind Load (kg/m²)Axial (kN)Shear (kN)Moment (kN·m)Span (m)Column Height (m)Frame Spacing (m)Base Type
1/3.0100-14.761.46~09.06.04.5Hinged
1/3.0150-15.641.5209.06.04.5Hinged
1/3.0200-15.841.5309.06.04.5Hinged
1/3.0100-13.333.09-560.29.04.54.5Fixed
1/3.0150-13.323.10-563.29.04.54.5
3Structural Analysis of Lattice Portal Frames

IS SP 47 (S&T) : 1988 provides detailed analysis and design guidance for Steel Lattice Portal Frames (without cranes). Below are key points and formulas:


1. Design Load Combination

  • For Dead Load (DL) + Wind Load (WL), multiply design forces by 1.33 to account for increased allowable stresses:

    [ F_{design} = 1.33 \times (DL + WL) ]


2. Typical Frame Geometry (Clause 6.0)

  • Column Height (H): 6.0 m
  • Frame Spacing (S): 6.0 m
  • Lacing Sections: Commonly 40×40 mm or 60×60 mm angles with 6 mm thickness
  • Lacing Spacing: As per design tables, typically between 500 mm to 900 mm depending on member size and buckling length

3. Structural Analysis Notes

  • Use moment distribution or matrix stiffness methods for frame analysis.
  • Lattice members are designed for axial forces; bending moments in chords are generally small.
  • Stability is ensured by proper lacing spacing and member sizing.

4. Sample Table Extract (Lacing Section & Spacing)

MemberLacing Section (mm)Lacing Spacing (mm)
Columns40×40×6 or 60×60×6600 - 900
Rafters40×40×6 or 75×75×6600 - 900

5. Design Checks

  • Axial Load Capacity:

    [ P_u = A \times f_y / \gamma_m ]

    Where:

    • (A) = Gross cross-sectional area
    • (f_y) = Yield strength
    • (\gamma_m) = Partial safety factor (typically 1.5)
  • Buckling Check:

    [ \sigma_{design} \leq \frac{f_y}{\text{Buckling Reduction Factor}} ]


6. Visualization of Lattice Portal Frame

graph TD
    A[Base Plate] -->|Column 6m|
4Design of Members

IS SP 47 (S&T): 1988 - Design of Steel Lattice Portal Frame Members

Key Notes (Clause 1.33)

  • For DL + WL load combination, multiply design forces by 1.33 to account for increased allowable stresses.
  • For DL + W'L combination, multiply design forces by 1.33 similarly.
  • For other combinations, multiply by 1/1.33 as applicable.

Member Design Parameters (From Tables 12, 15, 17)

ParameterTypical Values / Units
Span30 m
Column Height12 m
Frame Spacing6 m
Roof Slope1/3 to 1/5
Wind Pressure100 to 200 kg/m²
Member Depth (d)89 to 141 cm
Member Width (b)49 to 111 cm
Corner Size80×80×6 to 150×150×12 mm (ISA/ISRO sections)
Lacing SectionsISA 40×40×6 to 90×90×6 mm
Lacing Spacing70 to 114 cm
Unit Weight18 to 51 kg/m²

Design Force Adjustment Formula

[ F_{design} = F_{analysis} \times 1.33 \quad \text{(for DL + WL or DL + W'L)} ]

[ F_{design} = \frac{F_{analysis}}{1.33} \quad \text{(for other combinations)} ]


Typical Member Section Selection (Example for 1/3 Roof Slope, 150 kg/m² Wind)

MemberDepth (cm)Width (cm)Corner ISA (mm)Lacing ISA (mm)Lacing Spacing (cm)Unit Weight (kg/m²)
Column135101130×130×1060×60×6109
Beam
5Eaves Beam Design

Key Specifications for Eaves Beam Design (IS SP Part 47)

Clause 5.6 Highlights:

  • Eaves beams run along the building length at stanchion-rafter junctions.
  • Maximum slenderness ratio ≤ 250.
  • Recommended sections:
    • ISMB 200 for frame spacing 4.5 m.
    • ISMB 250 for frame spacing 6.0 m.
  • Connection: One ISA 90×90×6 web framing angle with 3 or 4 numbers of 16 mm dia block bolts.
  • Eaves beams can be hot-rolled or built-up lattice sections.

Slenderness Ratio Formula:

[ \text{Slenderness Ratio} = \frac{l}{r} \leq 250 ]

  • (l) = effective length of beam (mm)
  • (r) = radius of gyration of the section (mm)

Typical Eaves Beam Section Selection:

Frame Spacing (m)SectionMax Slenderness RatioConnection Details
4.5ISMB 200≤ 250ISA 90×90×6 + 3 bolts (16 mm dia)
6.0ISMB 250≤ 250ISA 90×90×6 + 4 bolts (16 mm dia)

Load & Moment Data (Example from Clause 9.0 for 9m span, 4.5m spacing):

Roof SlopeWind Pressure (kg/m²)Beam Compression (kN)Beam Tension (kN)Moment Compression (kN·m)Moment Tension (kN·m)
1/3.01007.42.118.115.5
1/3.01507.54.429.226.4
1/3.02007.66.936.
6Foundation Forces and Design

IS SP 47 (S&T) - Foundation Forces and Design Key Points

Foundation Forces (Clause 4.1)

  • Forces due to Dead Load (DL), Live Load (LL), and Wind Load (WL) are presented separately.
  • Two base conditions:
    • Fixed base: Use only if foundation ensures fixity (e.g., stiff soil with isolated footing).
    • Hinged base: For foundations not providing fixity.
  • Design forces can be combined for Working Stress or Limit State Design.
  • When using DL + WL, multiply forces by 1.33 (Clause 1.33) to increase allowable stresses.

Foundation Design Types

  • Spread footings, pile foundations, or caisson foundations depending on soil and support conditions.
  • Typical foundation design shown in Clause 6.

Tables for Foundation Forces

  • Tables 25 to 48: Critical foundation forces for various frame configurations.
  • Tables 50 to 73: Design results including member sizes, depths, and weights for different spans, heights, slopes, wind zones, and support conditions.

Typical Formula for Foundation Design Forces Combination:

[ F_{design} = 1.33 \times (DL + WL) \quad \text{(if DL + WL governs)} ]


Summary Table Extract (Example from Tables 25-48):

Load TypeBase ConditionUse Case
DLFixed/HingedSelf-weight of structure
LLFixed/HingedOccupancy/live load
WLFixed/HingedWind pressure on structure

Conceptual Diagram of Load Transfer to Foundation

flowchart TD
    A[Dead Load (DL)] --> F[Foundation]
    B[Live Load (LL)] --> F
    C[Wind Load (WL)] --> F
    F --> G[Soil Bearing]

Note: Refer to IS SP 47 Tables 25-73 for precise force values and member sizing based on your frame parameters.

7Wind Load Conditions and Effects

Wind Load Conditions & Effects (IS SP 47)

Key Parameters (Clause 18.435)

Load CaseWind DirectionNormal Permeability (N/m)Wind Pressure (N/m²) ColumnsRafters WindwardRafters Leeward
WL1Perpendicular to ridge-200700 (windward), 300 (leeward)-250-300
WL2Perpendicular to ridge+200300 (windward), 700 (leeward)-650-700
WL3Parallel to ridge+200200 (both windward & leeward)-600-600

Typical Wind Load Effects (from Clause 12.0 & 18.0 Tables)

Span (m)SlopeWind Load (kg/m²)Axial Force (kN)Shear Force (kN)Bending Moment (kN·m)
12.01/3100-20.446.40~1192.5
12.01/3200~20.096.405712.0
18.01/3100-29.3111.06-2836.6
18.01/3200-29.1310.9011922.6

Note: Negative axial indicates compression.


Wind Load Calculation Formula (General IS Code Practice)

[ P = 0.6 \times V^2 \times C_d \times C_e \times C_s ]

Where:

  • (P) = Wind pressure (N/m²)
  • (V) = Basic wind speed (m/s)
  • (C_d) = Drag coefficient (depends on shape)
8Earthquake Load Considerations

Earthquake Load Considerations — IS SP 47 (S&T) : 1988

Key Points:

  • IS SP 47 primarily provides wind and load effects on lattice portal frames; earthquake loads are considered similarly as lateral loads.
  • Design forces for DL + WL are multiplied by 1.33 to account for increased allowable stresses (Clause 1.33).
  • Earthquake load effects can be approximated by equivalent lateral forces similar to wind loads but adjusted per seismic zone and dynamic factors (refer IS 1893 for seismic coefficients).

Typical Load Parameters from SP 47 Tables (for portal frames):

ParameterRange/Values
Span9 m, 12 m, 18 m
Column Height4.5 m, 6.0 m
Frame Spacing4.5 m, 6.0 m
Wind Load (WL)10 - 67 kg/m² (varies by slope & DL)
Axial Force~ -13 to -29 kN (compression)
Shear Force~ 3 to 50 kN
Moment~ 520 to 12520 kN·m

Earthquake Load Estimation (General):

  • Use Equivalent Lateral Force Method (IS 1893):

    [ F = \alpha \times W ]

    Where:

    • ( F ) = design lateral force
    • ( \alpha ) = seismic coefficient (depends on seismic zone, soil, importance factor)
    • ( W ) = seismic weight of the structure
  • Apply forces at column bases and joints similar to wind loads in SP 47 tables.


Design Recommendations:

  • Use SP 47 load tables for axial, shear, and moment under lateral loads.
  • Multiply DL + WL forces by 1.33 for stress increase (Clause 1.33).
  • Refer to IS 1893 for seismic coefficients and dynamic factors.
  • Consider frame slope and span effects on lateral forces (see tables in Clauses 9.0, 12.0, 18.0).

graph LR
A[Seismic Weight (W)] --> B[Seismic Co
9Allowable Stresses and Load Combinations

IS SP 47 (S&T): 1988 — Allowable Stresses & Load Combinations

Key Points from Clause 1.33:

  • When design is governed by Dead Load (DL) + Wind Load (WL), multiply design forces by 1.33 to increase allowable stresses.

Allowable Stress Checks (Combined Axial & Bending):

For axial compression + bending:

[ \frac{f_u}{F_c} + \frac{M_c}{F_{be} Z} \leq 1.0 ]

For axial tension + bending:

[ \frac{f_u}{F_u} + \frac{M_t}{F_{be} Z} \leq 1.0 ]

Where:

  • ( f_u ) = actual axial compressive/tensile stress
  • ( F_c, F_u ) = allowable stresses under axial compression/tension
  • ( F_{be} ) = allowable bending stress
  • ( M_c, M_t ) = bending moments with compression/tension
  • ( Z ) = section modulus

Load Combination Factor:

Load CombinationFactor on Design Forces
DL + WL1.33

Summary Table (Allowable Stresses):

Stress TypeSymbolAllowable Stress
Axial Compression(F_c)As per SP 47 or IS 800
Axial Tension(F_u)As per SP 47 or IS 800
Bending(F_{be})As per SP 47 or IS 800

flowchart LR
    A[Design Forces] --> B{Load Combination?}
    B -->|DL + WL| C[Multiply forces by 1.33]
    B -->|Others| D[Use forces as is]
    C --> E[Check Allowable Stresses]
    D --> E
    E --> F{Stress Check}
    F -->|Axial Compression + Bending| G[\( \frac{f_u}{F_c} + \frac{M_c}{F_{be} Z} \leq 1 \)]
    F -->|Axial Tension + Bending
10Connection Details

IS SP 47 (S&T) : 1988 – Connection Details Summary

1. Haunch and Crown Connections (Clause 5.2.2, Table 75)

Corner Angle Size (mm)HSFG Bolt Size (mm)Number of BoltsGusset Plate Thickness (mm)
5050 × 6 to 9090 × 6202 to 312
8080 × 8 to 9090 × 820412
100100 × 8 to 130130 × 824416
110110 × 10 to 150150 × 12303 to 520
200200 × 12 to 200200 × 15306 to 820

2. Lacing Connection Details (Table 74)

  • Rod Lacing Sizes: 8mm to 18mm diameter rods.
  • Angle Lacing Sizes: 4040 × 6 mm to 110110 × 10 mm.
  • Fillet Weld Sizes: 3 mm to 6.5 mm with lengths proportional to member size.
  • Gusset Plate Thickness: 8 mm to 12 mm depending on lacing size.

3. Base Plate Connection Details (Table 76)

Corner Angle SizeWeld Size (mm)Weld Length (mm)Bolt Size (mm)Stiffening Channel (ISMC)Base Plate Thickness (mm)
5050 × 6 to 9090 × 64.5265 - 48520 - 30100 - 15020 - 25
8080 × 8 to 130130 × 106.0 - 7.5425 - 70030 - 45150 - 25025 - 40
11Design Examples

IS SP 47 (S&T) - Design Examples Key Points

1. Design Force Adjustment (Clause 1.33)

  • When design is controlled by Dead Load (DL) + Wind Load (WL), multiply design forces by 1.33 to account for increased allowable stresses.

    [ F_{design} = 1.33 \times (DL + WL) ]

2. Design Tables (Clause 3.3.4)

  • Tables 50 to 73 provide design results for lattice portal frames:
    • Varying span, length, column height, frame spacing
    • Two support conditions: hinged & fixed
    • Three roof slopes and wind zones
  • Tables include:
    • Overall depth & width of lattice members
    • Sizes of corner legs and intersections
    • Total frame weight per unit area (excluding purlins, bracings)

3. Sample Table Format (from Table 17)

MemberDepth (cm)Moment (kNm)Axial Force (kN)Weight (kN/m²)
Column53.3112.521.61.54
Beam32.8113.829.9

4. Foundation Forces

  • Use the multiplied design forces (DL + 1.33WL) for foundation design.

Summary for Practical Use:

  • Multiply DL + WL by 1.33 for design forces.
  • Refer to Tables 50-73 for member sizing and forces based on span, slope, and wind zone.
  • Use given member depths, moments, axial forces, and weights for design checks.
  • Foundation forces are derived from these amplified loads.
flowchart TD
    A[Loads: DL + WL] --> B[Multiply by 1.33]
    B --> C[Design Forces]
    C --> D[Select Table (50-73) based on span, slope, wind zone]
    D --> E[Member sizes, moments, axial forces]
    E --> F[Design Members & Foundation]

This approach ensures safe and optimized lattice portal frame design per IS SP 47

12Development Length of Anchor Bolts

Development Length of Anchor Bolts (IS SP Part 47)

From the provided context:

  • Clause 133.4:
    Development length required = (133.4 , \text{N/mm}^2 \times 24 , \text{mm} = 601 , \text{mm})
    (Here, 24 mm is likely the bolt diameter or an effective length parameter.)

  • Anchor Bolt Specification:

    • Use 12 bolts of 20 mm diameter for anchorage as per Clause 5.3 and Table 76.
    • Bolt diameter (d = 20 , \text{mm})
    • Development length (l_d = 601 , \text{mm}) (minimum embedment length into concrete for full strength)
  • Base Plate & Anchorage:
    Design must ensure that the anchor bolts develop the required tensile strength without pullout or yielding, considering forces from DL + LL and DL + WL cases.


Summary Table

ParameterValue
Bolt Diameter, (d)20 mm
Development Length, (l_d)601 mm
Number of Bolts12
Allowable Soil Bearing150 kN/m²
Footing Depth Below Grade2.5 m

Key Formula for Development Length (Generalized)

[ l_d = \frac{T_{bolt}}{\tau_{concrete} \times \pi \times d \times \text{embedment depth}} ]

Where:

  • (T_{bolt}) = tensile force in bolt
  • (\tau_{concrete}) = allowable shear stress of concrete (e.g., 133.4 N/mm² here)
  • (d) = bolt diameter

flowchart TD
    A[Anchor Bolt] --> B{Development Length}
    B --> C[Embedment in Concrete]
    B --> D[Base Plate Connection]
    C --> E[Resists Tensile Force]
    D --> F[Transfers Load to Foundation]

Note: Always verify development length with actual forces and concrete strength per IS 456 and IS 800 for steel-concrete interaction.

13References

IS SP Part 47: Key References Summary

The code provides detailed tables for steel lattice portal frames without cranes, covering various parameters:

1. Frame Parameters (Clauses 1.7, 4.5, 9.0, 24.0)

  • Span: 9 m to 24 m
  • Column Height: 4.5 m to 9.0 m
  • Frame Spacing: Typically 4.5 m
  • Roof Slopes: 1/3, 1/4, 1/5
  • Basic Wind Pressure: 100, 150, 200 kg/m²

2. Member Forces and Moments

  • Compression and Tension Forces (kN)
  • Moments at Haunch, Base, Crown (kN·m)
  • Shear Forces (kN)
  • Sway (cm)

3. Typical Data from Tables

ParameterColumn Compression (kN)Beam Tension (kN)Moment at Haunch (kN·m)Shear at Base (kN)Sway (cm)
Span 9m, Wind 100 kg/m², Roof 1/322.52.117.2 (column) / 18.1 (beam)4.81.83
Span 24m, Wind 150 kg/m², Roof 1/459.520.0140.0 (column) / 142.0 (beam)15.62.58

4. Design Notes:

  • Use fixed or hinged base conditions as specified.
  • Forces and moments vary with wind pressure and roof slope.
  • Sway values indicate lateral displacement under load.

Formula for Wind Load on Frame (IS 875 Part 3):

[ W = p_z \times A ]

  • (W) = Wind force (kN)
  • (p_z) = Design wind pressure (kN/m²)
  • (A) = Projected area (m²)

Visualization: Frame Load Components

graph TD
    A[Wind

Popular Questions About IS sp Part 47

?What are the specified load combinations for designing steel lattice portal frames?

Specified Load Combinations for Steel Lattice Portal Frames (IS SP 47):

  • Loads considered: Dead Load (DL), Live Load (LL), Wind Load (WL), and Earthquake Load (EQ).

  • Wind Load Conditions:

    1. Wind perpendicular to ridge with internal suction (WL1)
    2. Wind perpendicular to ridge with internal pressure (WL2)
    3. Wind parallel to ridge with internal pressure (WL3)
  • Design Approach:

    • Members are designed for maximum forces (axial, bending, shear) from combinations of DL, LL, and WL as per Clause 2.2 and 3.3.
    • Earthquake forces (per IS 1893) are checked but generally do not govern design due to lower forces than wind.
    • When design is governed by DL + WL, forces are multiplied by 1.33 to account for increased allowable stresses (Clause 1.33).

Typical Load Combinations (based on context and IS 875):

Load CombinationDescription
1DL + LL
2DL + WL1 (wind perp. + suction)
3DL + WL2 (wind perp. + pressure)
4DL + WL3 (wind parallel + pressure)
5DL + LL + WL (maximum of WL1, WL2, WL3)
6DL + EQ (checked but usually not governing)

Important Notes:

  • Dead load on frame (excluding columns): 40 - 60 kgf/m².
  • Live load as per IS 875 roof live loads, adjusted for slope.
  • Basic wind pressure per IS 875 (1964) for zones I, II, III.
  • Internal pressure ±0.2p included for normal permeability.

Loading diagram...
?How does the standard address wind load effects including internal pressure and suction?

IS SP Part 47 (1988) on Wind Load Effects:

  • Wind Load Cases: Three wind load scenarios are analyzed considering internal pressure/suction (from IS 875:1964):

    1. WL1: Wind perpendicular to ridge with internal suction (±0.2p).
    2. WL2: Wind perpendicular to ridge with internal pressure.
    3. WL3: Wind parallel to ridge with internal pressure.
  • Internal Pressure/Suction: For buildings with normal permeability, internal pressure is ±0.2 times the basic wind pressure (p).

  • Wind Pressures on Members:
    | Load Case | Internal Pressure (N/m²) | Columns (Windward/Leeward) | Rafters (Windward/Leeward) | |-----------|--------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------| | WL1 | -200 (suction) | 700 / 300 | -250 / -300 | | WL2 | +200 (pressure) | 300 / 700 | -650 / -700 | | WL3 | +200 (pressure) | 200 / 200 | -600 / -600 |

  • Design Approach: Analyze all three cases and design for the most critical forces. Internal pressure/suction significantly affects member forces and must be included.

  • Additional Notes: Earthquake forces per IS 1893 are checked but usually less critical than wind loads.

Loading diagram...

Summary: IS SP 47 adopts IS 875 wind pressures, incorporates internal pressure/suction ±0.2p for normal permeability, and analyzes three wind load cases (WL1, WL2, WL3) to capture the full range of wind effects on lattice portal frames.

?What are the recommended member sizes and lacing details for different frame spans?

Detailed content not available.

?How are foundation forces calculated for lattice portal frames according to this standard?

According to IS SP 47 (S&T):1988, foundation forces for lattice portal frames (without cranes) are calculated based on:

  • Load combinations: Dead Load (DL), Live Load (LL), Wind Load (WL), and their combinations.
  • Multiplication factor 1.33 is applied to DL + WL combinations to account for increased allowable stresses (Clause 1.33).
  • Tables 25, 29, 31, 33 provide tabulated axial forces, shear forces, and moments at the foundation for various spans, slopes, and wind pressures.

Key points from TABLE 29 (example):

ParameterValue
Span12.0 m
Column Height4.5 m
Frame Spacing4.5 m
Slope1/3, 1/4, 1/5
Wind Load100 to 200 kg/m²
Forces at foundationAxial (kN), Shear (kN), Moment (kN·m)

Typical foundation forces include:

  • Axial force: Can be tension or compression (negative values indicate tension).
  • Shear force: Horizontal force due to wind.
  • Moment: Usually zero or very small for hinged bases.

Calculation approach:

  1. Determine loads (DL, LL, WL) for the frame.
  2. Use relevant table based on slope, span, and wind pressure.
  3. Apply 1.33 factor on DL + WL forces if governing.
  4. Extract axial, shear, and moment forces from tables for foundation design.

Loading diagram...

This method ensures consistent foundation force values for lattice portal frames per IS SP 47 (S&T) 1988.

?Does the handbook provide guidance on seismic design for lattice portal frames?

IS SP 47 (1988) Handbook on Steel Lattice Portal Frames provides guidance on seismic design as follows:

  • Seismic loads are considered along with dead, live, and wind loads.
  • Lateral load resistance is achieved through frame action or longitudinal/lateral bracings.
  • Design includes axial forces, bending moments, and shear forces from load combinations including earthquake effects.
  • The handbook covers various earthquake zones (I to V) and frame configurations.
  • Typical parameters like span length (9 to 30 m), frame spacing (4.5 to 6 m), roof slope, and support types (fixed/hinged) are considered.
  • Analysis results for purlins, girts, and frame members under seismic loads are provided.

Summary:

Yes, IS SP 47 includes seismic design guidance for lattice portal frames, integrating earthquake loads per Indian seismic zoning and structural detailing.

Loading diagram...

This ensures structural stability against earthquakes following Indian standards.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS sp Part 47. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required