IS 9759:1981 provides comprehensive guidelines for dewatering during construction projects, focusing on typical civil engineering works excluding river valley projects and certain specialized conditions. It covers methods, design principles, equipment selection, and soil considerations to ensure effective groundwater control in excavations and foundations. This standard is essential for engineers involved in planning and executing dewatering systems to maintain site stability and safety.
Overview
IS 9759:1981 provides comprehensive guidelines for dewatering during construction projects, focusing on typical civil engineering works excluding river valley projects and certain specialized conditions. It covers methods, design principles, equipment selection, and soil considerations to ensure effective groundwater control in excavations and foundations. This standard is essential for engineers involved in planning and executing dewatering systems to maintain site stability and safety.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Discharge to a fully penetrating slot (artesian flow):
[ Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ]
Discharge to a fully penetrating slot (gravity flow):
[ Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k_x 2L ]
Discharge to a partially penetrating slot (gravity flow):
[ Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H - h_o}) k_x H' L ]
Discharge to a slot from two line sources (partially penetrating):
[ Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) L + Y D ]
Where (Y) depends on ratio (W/D).
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| (H) | Original groundwater level |
| (h_e) | Groundwater level at the use point |
| (h_o) | Reference groundwater level |
| (k) | Hydraulic conductivity |
| (D) | Depth of pervious stratum |
| (L) | Length of slot or well screen |
| (x) | Distance along flow direction |
| (Y) | Factor depending on geometry |
| Method | Suitable Soils | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravels, coarse sands | Simple equipment | Instability, fines removal issues |
Scope:
Guidelines for dewatering during construction, excluding river valley projects and powerhouses in boulder/gravel reaches.
| Condition | Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fully Penetrating Slot - Artesian | ( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ) | (H) = original water level, (h_e) = water level at use |
| Fully Penetrating Slot - Gravity | ( Q = 5/7 \times (H - h_e) k_x 2L ) | (L) = distance from line source, (D) = depth of pervious stratum |
| Partially Penetrating Slot - Artesian | ( Q = k D x (H - h_e) L + E ) | (E) = correction factor |
| Partially Penetrating Slot - Gravity | ( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k_x 2L ) | Adjusted for partial penetration |
For fully penetrating wells:
[
H - h = \frac{n + \ln(N_f)}{k D} \times \left( N_f + 2n^2 \right) \times N_e
]
For partially penetrating wells:
[
H - h = \frac{n + 0.4}{k D}
]
Where:
| Method | Suitable Soils | Uses | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravels, coarse sands | Shallow excavations | Simple equipment | Fines removal, instability |
| Wellpoint System | Sandy gravels to fine sands |
IS 9759: Definitions, Terminology & Key Discharge Formulae
| Slot Type | Flow Condition | Discharge Formula (Q) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partially penetrating | Artesian | ( Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) L + YD ) | (Y) depends on (W/D) ratio |
| Partially penetrating | Gravity | ( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H'}) k_x H' L (H' - h_{e2}) ) | (H'): Slot penetration depth (see Fig. 2) |
| Fully penetrating | Both | ( Q = 2 \times ) (Q from Table 2 for respective case) | Slot is midway between line sources |
[ h = h_e + (H - h_e) \frac{y + D}{L + y D} ]
flowchart LR
A[Water Table Height H] --> B[Slot with Penetration Depth H']
B --> C{Flow Condition}
IS 9759: General Principles of Dewatering
Dewatering Operation (7.9):
Dewatering methods must be selected based on soil conditions, groundwater level, and construction requirements.
Particle Size Distribution (5.2):
| Soil Type | Particle Size Range | Suitable Dewatering Method |
|---|---|---|
| Coarse Sand | >0.06 mm | Wellpoint, Deep Wells |
| Fine Sand | 0.02 - 0.06 mm | Wellpoint, Eductor Systems |
| Silty Sand | 0.002 - 0.02 mm | Vacuum Dewatering, Cut-off Walls |
| Clay & Silts | <0.002 mm | Electro-osmosis, Freezing Methods |
Drawdown (s):
[
s = H - h
]
Where:
Flow rate for wellpoint system (Q):
[
Q = \frac{2 \pi K D s}{\ln(R/r)}
]
Where:
IS 9759: Subsurface Investigation and Soil Conditions
| Type of Sand | Coefficient of Permeability, k (cm/sec) |
|---|---|
| Very fine sand | 1 to 50 |
| Fine sand | 51 to 200 |
| Fine to medium sand | 201 to 500 |
| Medium sand | 501 to 1000 |
| Medium to coarse sand | 1001 to 1500 |
| Gravel and coarse sand | 1501 to 3000 |
[ k = C_1 \times D_{10} ]
flowchart LR
A[Subsurface Investigation] --> B[Soil Type Identification]
B --> C[Determine Permeability]
C --> D{Pumping Test Conducted?}
D -- Yes --> E[Use Measured Permeability]
D -- No --> F[Estimate k using k = C1 * D10]
E & F --> G[Select Dewatering System]
This ensures proper design and safety of dewatering operations.
IS 9759: Selection of Dewatering Methods - Key Points
| Soil Type | Suitable Dewatering Method |
|---|---|
| Clean gravels, coarse sands | Sump pumping |
| Sandy gravels to fine sands | Wellpoint system with pumps |
| Gravels to silty fine sands | Deep bored filter wells |
| Silts, silty clays, peats | Electro-osmosis |
| Sands & silty sands | Jet eductor system |
| Method | Soil Suitability | Uses | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sump pumping | Clean gravels, coarse sands | Shallow excavations | Simple equipment | Instability, fines removal |
| Wellpoint system | Sandy gravels to fine sands | Open excavations | Quick, economical | Limited suction lift (4.5-6 m), noise |
| Deep bored wells | Gravels to silty sands | Deep excavations | No drawdown limit, multi-layer | High cost, complex |
| Electro-osmosis | Silts, clays, peats | Special soils | Applicable where others fail | High cost |
| Jet eductor | Sands, silty sands | Deep confined excavations | No drawdown limit | Costly, flooding risk |
| Penetration | Flow Condition | Discharge Formula | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating slot | Artesian | ( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ) | (H) = original water level, (h_e) = water level at use |
| Fully penetrating slot | Gravity | ( Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k x 2L ) | (Q) = flow rate, (L) = slot length, (D) = depth of pervious stratum |
For fully penetrating wells: [ H - h = \frac{n + \ln\left(\frac{a}{r_w}\right)}{f_a} ]
For partially penetrating wells, a modified formula applies (refer to IS 9759 for exact terms).
| Penetration | Flow Condition | Discharge Formula | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating | Artesian | ( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ) | (k): permeability, (D): depth, (L): slot length |
| Fully penetrating | Gravity | ( Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k x 2L ) | (H): original water level, (h_e): water level at use |
| Partially penetrating | Artesian | ( Q = k D x (H - h_e) L + E ) | (E): empirical correction term |
| Partially penetrating | Gravity | ( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k x 2Z (H_0 - h_0) ) | See IS 9759 for detailed terms |
| Method | Suitable Soils | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravels, coarse sands | Simple, economical for shallow excavations | May remove fines, cause instability |
| Wellpoint System | Sandy gravels to fine sands |
IS 9759: Key Formulas & Specs for Wellpoint and Deep Well Systems
Discharge-Drawdown Relation:
For wellpoints closely spaced, treat the line of wells as a slot for flow calculations.
Fundamental Formula (Dupuit-Thiem approximation for steady flow to a line sink):
[ Q = \frac{2 \pi K (H^2 - h^2)}{\ln \frac{R}{r}} ]
Where:
| Well Diameter (mm) | Approx. Max Capacity (L/s) |
|---|---|
| 150 | 10 - 20 |
| 200 | 20 - 40 |
| 300 | 40 - 80 |
Refer IS 9759 Table 8 for detailed values.
flowchart
IS 9759: Installation & Operation of Deep Well Systems - Key Points
| Well Diameter (mm) | Max Pump Capacity (m³/hr) |
|---|---|
| 150 | 20 - 30 |
| 200 | 30 - 50 |
| 250 | 50 - 70 |
Note: Actual Table 8 should be consulted for precise values.
flowchart LR
A[Deep Well] --> B[Turbine/Submersible Pump]
B --> C[Pump Base]
C --> D{Water Flow through Soil?}
D -- Yes --> E[Install Wellpoints & Sand Drains]
D -- No --> F[Stable Pump Base]
Summary: Select pumps per Table 8 capacity at rated speeds; protect pump base from soil erosion by installing wellpoints/sand drains; follow installation steps for alignment and anchorage.
IS 9759: Key Formulas & Specifications for Sump Pumping
To estimate the required pump capacity for surface runoff:
[ ID = QR - V \times T ]
Where:
This helps size pumps to handle runoff without overflow.
Suitable pumps for open sumps include:
| Pump Type | Application |
|---|---|
| Centrifugal | General sump pumping |
| Submersible | Deep sumps, submerged operations |
| Wellpoint Pumps | Dewatering with wellpoint system |
flowchart TD
A[Rainfall] --> B[Surface Runoff QR]
B --> C[Sump Volume V]
C --> D[Pump Capacity Q]
D --> E[Discharge]
E --> F[Prevent Flooding]
Summary: Use the formula (Q = QR - \frac{V}{T}) to size pumps; select pump type per Table 9; apply discharge formulas for surface water control; wellpoint pumps for groundwater.
IS 9759: Safety and Stability Considerations in Dewatering
| Condition | Discharge Formula | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating slot (Artesian) | ( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ) | (k): permeability, (D): depth, (L): length, (H): initial water level, (h_e): water level at use |
| Fully penetrating slot (Gravity) | ( Q = 5.7 \times (H - h_e) \times k \times 2L ) | Same as above |
| Partially penetrating slot (Artesian) | ( Q = k D x (H - h_e) \times (L + E) ) | (E): correction factor |
| Partially penetrating slot (Gravity) | ( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) \times k \times 2Z (H_0 - h_0) ) | (Z): depth parameter, (H_0, h_0): levels |
| Filter Material Characteristic | Ratio (R_{50} = \frac{D_{50,filter}}{D_{50,protected}}) | Ratio (R_{15} = \frac{D_{15,filter}}{D_{15,protected}}) |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform grain size (U=3 to 4) | 5 to 10 | -- |
| Well graded, subrounded grains | 12 to 58 | 12 to 40 |
| Well graded, angular particles | 9 to 30 | 6 to 18 |
Note: Proper filter design prevents piping under large hydraulic gradients.
IS 9759: Electro-Osmosis Method Key Points
[ Q = -k_g \cdot i \cdot z / a ]
| Parameter | Description | Typical Value/Unit |
|---|---|---|
| (Q) | Discharge to a well | cm³/sec or cm³/s |
| (k_g) | Coefficient of electro-osmotic permeability | ≈ (0.5 \times 10^{-4}) cm/(V·cm) |
| (i) | Electric potential gradient (volts/cm) | V/cm |
| (z) | Depth of soil stabilized | cm |
| (a) | Effective spacing between wells | cm |
flowchart LR
A[Electric Field Applied] --> B[Pore Water Movement]
B --> C[Water Collected at Wells]
C --> D[Discharge to Absorption Ditch or Recharging Wells]
Summary: Use electro-osmosis for low permeability soils (<0.5×10⁻⁴ cm/sec). Calculate discharge using (Q = -k_g i z / a) and ensure proper water disposal to maintain groundwater equilibrium.
IS 9759: Hydraulic Calculations & Flow Formulas Summary
| Slot Penetration | Flow Condition | Discharge Formula | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating slot | Artesian | ( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ) | (H) = original groundwater level, (h_e) = water level at use, (L) = slot length, (D) = pervious stratum depth |
| Gravity | ( Q = 0.57 (H - h_e) k x 2L ) | ||
| Partially penetrating slot | Artesian | ( Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) (L + Y D) ) | (Y) depends on slot penetration ratio (see Fig. 2) |
| Gravity | ( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k x 2L (H' - h_{2e}) ) | (H') = penetration into previous stratum |
[ H - h = (n + \ln \frac{a}{r_w}) \frac{Q}{2 \pi k D} \quad \text{(Fully penetrating wells)} ]
[ H - h = \text{(similar form with correction factor for partial penetration)} ]
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| (Q) | Discharge (flow rate) |
| (k) | Hydraulic conductivity |
IS 9759: Key Formulas & Specifications for Pump Selection and Performance
Calculate required pump horsepower (HP) as:
[ \text{Horse Power} = \frac{\text{Total discharge (gpm)} \times \text{Total dynamic head (m)}}{3960 \times \text{Efficiency}} ]
Vacuum Pumps:
Jet-eductor Pumps:
| Parameter | Value/Range |
|---|---|
| Vacuum for wellpoint pump | 6 to 7.5 m (design 6 m) |
| Well diameter for deep pumps | ≥ 150 mm |
| Jet-eductor lowering capacity | 15 to 30 m |
| Flow rate for jet-eductor | < 10-15 gpm |
flowchart TD
A[Pump Selection] --> B[Calculate HP]
B --> C{Total Discharge x Head}
C --> D[Divide by 3960 x Efficiency]
A --> E[Select Pump Type]
E --> F[Deep Well Pump (≥150 mm)]
E --> G
[ H - h = \frac{n + \ln\left(\frac{a}{r_w}\right)}{k D} \times Q ]
[ H - h = f_a \times \frac{n + \ln\left(\frac{a}{r_w}\right)}{k D} \times Q ]
Where:
| Filter Type | (R_{50} = \frac{D_{50}^{filter}}{D_{50}^{soil}}) | (R_{15} = \frac{D_{15}^{filter}}{D_{15}^{soil}}) |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform (U=3-4) | 5 to 10 | -- |
| Well graded, subrounded | 12 to 58 | 12 to 40 |
| Well graded, angular | 9 to 30 | 6 to 18 |
| Method | Suitable Soils | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravels, coarse sands | Simple, low cost | Instability, |
Frequently Asked
According to IS 9759 (1981), the recommended dewatering methods depend primarily on the soil type and particle size distribution:
| Soil Type | Recommended Dewatering Method |
|---|---|
| Coarse-grained soils (sand, gravel) | Wellpoint systems, deep wells |
| Medium-grained soils (silty sand) | Wellpoint systems, ejector wells |
| Fine-grained soils (clay, silts) | Vacuum dewatering, electro-osmosis, or cut-off walls |
Loading diagram...
This approach ensures efficient and economical dewatering tailored to soil characteristics.
Pump Horsepower Calculation (IS 9759 - Clause 6.3.7):
The required pump horsepower (HP) for a dewatering system is calculated by:
[ \text{Horse Power} = \frac{\text{Total discharge (gpm)} \times \text{Total dynamic head (m)}}{3960 \times \text{Efficiency}} ]
Where:
| Parameter | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total discharge (Q) | gpm | Pump flow rate |
| Total dynamic head (H) | meters | Vacuum head - friction losses |
| Efficiency (η) | decimal | Pump + engine efficiency (e.g., 0.7) |
| Constant | 3960 | Conversion factor from IS 9759 |
Loading diagram...
Ensure:
Design Considerations for Wellpoint and Deep Well Systems (IS 9759)
Determination of Key Parameters (Clause 6.1):
Design Procedure (Clause 6.3 & 6.3.13.2):
Pump Selection for Deep Wells (Clause 6.3.13.6):
Additional Notes:
| Well Diameter (mm) | Typical Pump Capacity (m³/hr) |
|---|---|
| 150 | 50 - 100 |
| 200 | 100 - 200 |
| 300 | 200 - 400 |
Loading diagram...
This approach ensures efficient dewatering by matching well design and pump capacity to site conditions.
IS 9759 addresses dewatering in low permeability soils (silts, clays) as follows:
| Soil Type | Permeability (cm/sec) | Recommended Method |
|---|---|---|
| Gravel, Sand | > 10⁻⁴ | Wells, wellpoints, vacuum |
| Silts, Clays | < 0.5 × 10⁻⁴ | Electro-osmosis, sand drains |
Loading diagram...
This approach ensures effective dewatering even in challenging low permeability soils.
To prevent excavation instability during dewatering as per IS 9759, key safety measures include:
Loading diagram...
Remember: Proper design, installation, and maintenance of dewatering and erosion control systems are critical for excavation safety.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 9759. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required