IS 97591981AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Guidelines for dewatering during construction

IS 9759:1981 provides comprehensive guidelines for dewatering during construction projects, focusing on typical civil engineering works excluding river valley projects and certain specialized conditions. It covers methods, design principles, equipment selection, and soil considerations to ensure effective groundwater control in excavations and foundations. This standard is essential for engineers involved in planning and executing dewatering systems to maintain site stability and safety.

15Sections
188Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1981Edition
Soil and Foundation EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 9759 PDF, IS 9759 pdf free download, IS 9759 free download pdf, IS9759 PDF, IS-9759 PDF, IS 9759 1981 PDF, IS 9759:1981 PDF, IS 9759-1981 PDF, IS 9759 (1981) PDF, IS 9759 1981 edition PDF, IS 9759 edition 1981 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 9759:1981 provides comprehensive guidelines for dewatering during construction projects, focusing on typical civil engineering works excluding river valley projects and certain specialized conditions. It covers methods, design principles, equipment selection, and soil considerations to ensure effective groundwater control in excavations and foundations. This standard is essential for engineers involved in planning and executing dewatering systems to maintain site stability and safety.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Civil Engineers
  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Construction Project Managers
  • Foundation Engineers
  • Site Supervisors
  • Hydraulic Engineers
  • Environmental Engineers

Key Topics Covered

Dewatering methods and systems
Soil and geological investigation for dewatering
Design and analysis of dewatering systems
Wellpoint and deep well systems
Pump selection and sizing
Hydraulic head and flow calculations
Installation and operation of dewatering equipment
Flow net construction and interpretation
Handling of silts and clayey soils
Protection against soil instability and seepage
Electro-osmosis for low permeability soils
Sump pumping techniques
Safety considerations in dewatering
Maintenance and troubleshooting of dewatering systems

Table of Contents

0Foreword

IS 9759: Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications (Foreword & Dewatering Flow)

1. Foreword Highlights

  • Provides guidelines for dewatering in normal civil construction (excluding river valley projects like earth dams).
  • Covers common dewatering methods for soils like gravels, sands, silts.
  • Developed with help from Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee.
  • Values to be rounded as per IS 2-1960.

2. Key Dewatering Flow Formulas (Clause 1.10, Tables 2 & 3)

  • Discharge to a fully penetrating slot (artesian flow):

    [ Q = k D x L (H - h_e) ]

  • Discharge to a fully penetrating slot (gravity flow):

    [ Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k_x 2L ]

  • Discharge to a partially penetrating slot (gravity flow):

    [ Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H - h_o}) k_x H' L ]

  • Discharge to a slot from two line sources (partially penetrating):

    [ Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) L + Y D ]

    Where (Y) depends on ratio (W/D).


3. Parameters

SymbolMeaning
(H)Original groundwater level
(h_e)Groundwater level at the use point
(h_o)Reference groundwater level
(k)Hydraulic conductivity
(D)Depth of pervious stratum
(L)Length of slot or well screen
(x)Distance along flow direction
(Y)Factor depending on geometry

4. Dewatering Methods Comparison (Table 1 Summary)

MethodSuitable SoilsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Sump PumpingClean gravels, coarse sandsSimple equipmentInstability, fines removal issues
1Scope

IS 9759: Scope - Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications

Scope:
Guidelines for dewatering during construction, excluding river valley projects and powerhouses in boulder/gravel reaches.


Key Discharge Formulae (Clause 6.2)

ConditionFormulaNotes
Fully Penetrating Slot - Artesian( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) )(H) = original water level, (h_e) = water level at use
Fully Penetrating Slot - Gravity( Q = 5/7 \times (H - h_e) k_x 2L )(L) = distance from line source, (D) = depth of pervious stratum
Partially Penetrating Slot - Artesian( Q = k D x (H - h_e) L + E )(E) = correction factor
Partially Penetrating Slot - Gravity( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k_x 2L )Adjusted for partial penetration

Well Discharge Correction (Clause 1.10)

For fully penetrating wells:
[ H - h = \frac{n + \ln(N_f)}{k D} \times \left( N_f + 2n^2 \right) \times N_e ]

For partially penetrating wells:
[ H - h = \frac{n + 0.4}{k D} ]

Where:

  • (a) = well spacing
  • (D) = depth of pervious stratum
  • (T_w) = effective well radius
  • (f_a) = uplift factor (depends on well screen penetration)

Table 1: Dewatering Systems Summary

MethodSuitable SoilsUsesAdvantagesDisadvantages
Sump PumpingClean gravels, coarse sandsShallow excavationsSimple equipmentFines removal, instability
Wellpoint SystemSandy gravels to fine sands
2Definitions and Terminology

IS 9759: Definitions, Terminology & Key Discharge Formulae

Key Definitions (Clause 2.0)

  • H: Total head or water table height above a datum.
  • he, he2, ho: Various piezometric heads at specific points.
  • k, kx, kD: Hydraulic conductivity coefficients.
  • L, D: Geometrical dimensions (length, depth).
  • Q: Discharge or flow rate to a slot or well.

Discharge Formulae (Clause 6.2, Tables 2 & 3)

Slot TypeFlow ConditionDischarge Formula (Q)Remarks
Partially penetratingArtesian( Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) L + YD )(Y) depends on (W/D) ratio
Partially penetratingGravity( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H'}) k_x H' L (H' - h_{e2}) )(H'): Slot penetration depth (see Fig. 2)
Fully penetratingBoth( Q = 2 \times ) (Q from Table 2 for respective case)Slot is midway between line sources

Notes on Variables Substitution (per IS 9759 corrections)

  • Substitute (N_1 N_e') for (N_0 N_f).
  • Replace (Q) in Tables 2 & 3 with corrected expressions involving (k D x), (H - h_e), and penetration depths.
  • Use (h = h_e + (H - h_e) \frac{J + D}{L + D}) for head at distance.
  • For flow at distance (y > 1.3 D), head varies linearly:

[ h = h_e + (H - h_e) \frac{y + D}{L + y D} ]


Summary Diagram: Flow to a Slot

flowchart LR
    A[Water Table Height H] --> B[Slot with Penetration Depth H']
    B --> C{Flow Condition}
3General Principles of Dewatering

IS 9759: General Principles of Dewatering

Key Points from Clause 7.9 & 5.2:

  • Dewatering Operation (7.9):
    Dewatering methods must be selected based on soil conditions, groundwater level, and construction requirements.

  • Particle Size Distribution (5.2):

    • Soil particle size distribution is critical for selecting the dewatering method.
    • Conduct sieve analysis to obtain grading curve.
    • Use Fig. 1 (soil classification chart) to match soil type with suitable dewatering technique.

Typical Dewatering Methods vs Soil Type (from Fig. 1 concept):

Soil TypeParticle Size RangeSuitable Dewatering Method
Coarse Sand>0.06 mmWellpoint, Deep Wells
Fine Sand0.02 - 0.06 mmWellpoint, Eductor Systems
Silty Sand0.002 - 0.02 mmVacuum Dewatering, Cut-off Walls
Clay & Silts<0.002 mmElectro-osmosis, Freezing Methods

General Dewatering Design Formulas:

  • Drawdown (s):
    [ s = H - h ]
    Where:

    • (H) = initial groundwater level
    • (h) = lowered groundwater level after dewatering
  • Flow rate for wellpoint system (Q):
    [ Q = \frac{2 \pi K D s}{\ln(R/r)} ]
    Where:

    • (K) = coefficient of permeability (m/s)
    • (D) = thickness of the aquifer (m)
    • (s) = drawdown (m)
    • (R) = radius of influence (m)
    • (r) = radius of wellpoint (m)

Summary:

  • Step 1: Determine soil particle size distribution by sieve analysis.
  • Step 2: Refer to soil classification (Fig. 1) for suitable dewatering method.
  • Step 3: Calculate drawdown and flow rate using above formulas to design the system.
  • **Step
4Subsurface Investigation and Soil Conditions

IS 9759: Subsurface Investigation and Soil Conditions

Key Points from Clauses 4.3.1 & 5.1

  • Subsurface investigation is essential to determine soil type and select the appropriate dewatering system.
  • Table I (Clause 5.1) guides the selection of dewatering based on soil type.
  • Permeability of pervious strata must be determined by field pumping tests for accuracy.

Coefficient of Permeability (k) for Sands (Clause 4.3.1.5)

Type of SandCoefficient of Permeability, k (cm/sec)
Very fine sand1 to 50
Fine sand51 to 200
Fine to medium sand201 to 500
Medium sand501 to 1000
Medium to coarse sand1001 to 1500
Gravel and coarse sand1501 to 3000

Approximate Formula for Coefficient of Permeability (if no pumping test):

[ k = C_1 \times D_{10} ]

  • (k) = coefficient of permeability (cm/s)
  • (C_1) = constant (100 to 150)
  • (D_{10}) = effective grain size (cm)
  • Applicable for uniform sands with uniformity coefficient ≤ 2 in loose state.

Notes:

  • For large/deep excavations, permeability should be measured through full depth.
  • Use field pumping tests for precise permeability values.

flowchart LR
    A[Subsurface Investigation] --> B[Soil Type Identification]
    B --> C[Determine Permeability]
    C --> D{Pumping Test Conducted?}
    D -- Yes --> E[Use Measured Permeability]
    D -- No --> F[Estimate k using k = C1 * D10]
    E & F --> G[Select Dewatering System]

This ensures proper design and safety of dewatering operations.

5Selection of Dewatering Methods

IS 9759: Selection of Dewatering Methods - Key Points


1. Soil Particle Size Distribution (Clause 5.2 & Fig.1)

  • Dewatering method depends on soil type (gravel, sand, silt, clay).
  • Determine soil gradation by sieve analysis.
  • Plot grading curve on Fig.1 to select the suitable system.
Soil TypeSuitable Dewatering Method
Clean gravels, coarse sandsSump pumping
Sandy gravels to fine sandsWellpoint system with pumps
Gravels to silty fine sandsDeep bored filter wells
Silts, silty clays, peatsElectro-osmosis
Sands & silty sandsJet eductor system

2. Comparative Table of Dewatering Methods (Table 1)

MethodSoil SuitabilityUsesAdvantagesDisadvantages
Sump pumpingClean gravels, coarse sandsShallow excavationsSimple equipmentInstability, fines removal
Wellpoint systemSandy gravels to fine sandsOpen excavationsQuick, economicalLimited suction lift (4.5-6 m), noise
Deep bored wellsGravels to silty sandsDeep excavationsNo drawdown limit, multi-layerHigh cost, complex
Electro-osmosisSilts, clays, peatsSpecial soilsApplicable where others failHigh cost
Jet eductorSands, silty sandsDeep confined excavationsNo drawdown limitCostly, flooding risk

3. Flow to a Slot from a Single Line Source (Clause 6.2.2, Table 2)

PenetrationFlow ConditionDischarge FormulaRemarks
Fully penetrating slotArtesian( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) )(H) = original water level, (h_e) = water level at use
Fully penetrating slotGravity( Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k x 2L )(Q) = flow rate, (L) = slot length, (D) = depth of pervious stratum
6Analysis and Design of Dewatering Systems

Key Formulas & Tables for Analysis and Design of Dewatering Systems (IS 9759)


1. Discharge from Wells / Wellpoints (Clause 1.10)

For fully penetrating wells: [ H - h = \frac{n + \ln\left(\frac{a}{r_w}\right)}{f_a} ]

  • (H): Original groundwater level
  • (h): Drawdown at well
  • (a): Well spacing
  • (r_w): Effective well radius
  • (f_a): Uplift factor (depends on penetration)
  • (n): Number of wells in the group

For partially penetrating wells, a modified formula applies (refer to IS 9759 for exact terms).


2. Flow to a Slot from a Single Line Source (Clause 6.2.2)

PenetrationFlow ConditionDischarge FormulaRemarks
Fully penetratingArtesian( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) )(k): permeability, (D): depth, (L): slot length
Fully penetratingGravity( Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k x 2L )(H): original water level, (h_e): water level at use
Partially penetratingArtesian( Q = k D x (H - h_e) L + E )(E): empirical correction term
Partially penetratingGravity( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k x 2Z (H_0 - h_0) )See IS 9759 for detailed terms

3. Soil Suitability & Dewatering Methods (Table 1 Summary)

MethodSuitable SoilsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Sump PumpingClean gravels, coarse sandsSimple, economical for shallow excavationsMay remove fines, cause instability
Wellpoint SystemSandy gravels to fine sands
7Installation and Operation of Wellpoint and Deep Well Systems

IS 9759: Key Formulas & Specs for Wellpoint and Deep Well Systems


1. Deep Well Pumps (Clause 6.3.13.6)

  • Pump Types: Turbine or Submersible pumps for wells ≥ 150 mm diameter.
  • Selection Criteria: Based on pump capacity, not just well yield.
  • Capacity Estimation: Use Table 8 (IS 9759) for approximate max capacity.
  • Operation: Pumps should run at rated speeds for efficiency; higher speeds increase capacity with safety margin.

2. Wellpoint Pumps (Clause 6.3.10 & 6.2.1)

  • Discharge-Drawdown Relation:
    For wellpoints closely spaced, treat the line of wells as a slot for flow calculations.

  • Fundamental Formula (Dupuit-Thiem approximation for steady flow to a line sink):

    [ Q = \frac{2 \pi K (H^2 - h^2)}{\ln \frac{R}{r}} ]

    Where:

    • (Q) = discharge (m³/s)
    • (K) = hydraulic conductivity (m/s)
    • (H) = initial water table height (m)
    • (h) = drawdown height (m)
    • (R) = radius of influence (m)
    • (r) = radius of wellpoint or slot (m)

3. Design Steps (Clause 6.3)

  • Determine soil permeability (K).
  • Estimate drawdown (h) and radius of influence (R).
  • Calculate discharge (Q) per wellpoint or deep well.
  • Select pumps based on calculated discharge and rated speeds.
  • Ensure spacing and number of wellpoints meet dewatering needs.

Summary Table (Example for Deep Well Pump Capacity)

Well Diameter (mm)Approx. Max Capacity (L/s)
15010 - 20
20020 - 40
30040 - 80

Refer IS 9759 Table 8 for detailed values.


flowchart
8Installation and Operation of Deep Well Systems

IS 9759: Installation & Operation of Deep Well Systems - Key Points

1. Selection of Deep Well Pumps (Clause 6.3.13.6)

  • Use turbine or submersible pumps for wells ≥ 150 mm diameter.
  • Select pumps based on pump capacity, not just well yield.
  • Refer to Table 8 (IS 9759) for approximate max capacity of deep well pumps.
  • Pumps should operate at normal rated speeds; capacity increases at higher speeds (safety margin).

2. Installation Guidelines (Clause 8.1)

  • Ensure proper alignment and secure anchorage of pump units.
  • Prevent flooding/slushing at pump base by controlling water flow through sandy soil.
  • Use wellpoints and sand drains on basin side to intercept flow and stabilize pump base (Clause 7.9.4).

3. Pump Base Protection (Clause 7.9.4)

  • Avoid tilting/slushing caused by water flow through soil.
  • Install sand drains and wellpoints to maintain stable soil conditions around pump base.

Example: Approximate Maximum Capacity (from Table 8, IS 9759)

Well Diameter (mm)Max Pump Capacity (m³/hr)
15020 - 30
20030 - 50
25050 - 70

Note: Actual Table 8 should be consulted for precise values.


flowchart LR
    A[Deep Well] --> B[Turbine/Submersible Pump]
    B --> C[Pump Base]
    C --> D{Water Flow through Soil?}
    D -- Yes --> E[Install Wellpoints & Sand Drains]
    D -- No --> F[Stable Pump Base]

Summary: Select pumps per Table 8 capacity at rated speeds; protect pump base from soil erosion by installing wellpoints/sand drains; follow installation steps for alignment and anchorage.

9Sump Pumping

IS 9759: Key Formulas & Specifications for Sump Pumping


1. Pump Capacity Formula (Clause 10.4.6)

To estimate the required pump capacity for surface runoff:

[ ID = QR - V \times T ]

Where:

  • Q = Total pump capacity (volume/time)
  • QR = Average rate of runoff (volume/time)
  • V = Volume of sump (volume)
  • T = Duration of rainfall (time)

This helps size pumps to handle runoff without overflow.


2. Pump Types (Clause 9.2.8, Table 9)

Suitable pumps for open sumps include:

Pump TypeApplication
CentrifugalGeneral sump pumping
SubmersibleDeep sumps, submerged operations
Wellpoint PumpsDewatering with wellpoint system

3. Surface Water Discharge (Clause 6.2)

  • Use standard discharge formulae (e.g., Manning’s equation) for surface water flow estimation.

4. Wellpoint Pumps (Clause 6.3.10)

  • Used for dewatering by lowering groundwater level around excavation.

flowchart TD
    A[Rainfall] --> B[Surface Runoff QR]
    B --> C[Sump Volume V]
    C --> D[Pump Capacity Q]
    D --> E[Discharge]
    E --> F[Prevent Flooding]

Summary: Use the formula (Q = QR - \frac{V}{T}) to size pumps; select pump type per Table 9; apply discharge formulas for surface water control; wellpoint pumps for groundwater.

10Safety and Stability Considerations

IS 9759: Safety and Stability Considerations in Dewatering

Key Formulas for Discharge (Clause 6.2 & Table 2)

ConditionDischarge FormulaParameters
Fully penetrating slot (Artesian)( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) )(k): permeability, (D): depth, (L): length, (H): initial water level, (h_e): water level at use
Fully penetrating slot (Gravity)( Q = 5.7 \times (H - h_e) \times k \times 2L )Same as above
Partially penetrating slot (Artesian)( Q = k D x (H - h_e) \times (L + E) )(E): correction factor
Partially penetrating slot (Gravity)( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) \times k \times 2Z (H_0 - h_0) )(Z): depth parameter, (H_0, h_0): levels

Filter Design Criteria (Clause 6.3.5)

Filter Material CharacteristicRatio (R_{50} = \frac{D_{50,filter}}{D_{50,protected}})Ratio (R_{15} = \frac{D_{15,filter}}{D_{15,protected}})
Uniform grain size (U=3 to 4)5 to 10--
Well graded, subrounded grains12 to 5812 to 40
Well graded, angular particles9 to 306 to 18

Note: Proper filter design prevents piping under large hydraulic gradients.

Dewatering Methods & Suitability (Table 1)

  • Sump Pumping: Simple, suitable for clean gravels/coarse sands; risk of instability.
  • Wellpoint Systems: Sandy gravels to fine sands; economical for short durations; limited suction lift (~4.5-6 m).
  • **Deep Bored
11Electro-osmosis Method

IS 9759: Electro-Osmosis Method Key Points


1. Principle (Clause 2.4 & Appendix A)

  • Electro-osmosis uses an electric field to move pore water in fine-grained soils (silts, clays) where gravity drainage is ineffective.
  • Useful when soil permeability < 0.5 × 10⁻⁴ cm/sec.

2. Discharge Estimation (Appendix A-1.8)

[ Q = -k_g \cdot i \cdot z / a ]

ParameterDescriptionTypical Value/Unit
(Q)Discharge to a wellcm³/sec or cm³/s
(k_g)Coefficient of electro-osmotic permeability≈ (0.5 \times 10^{-4}) cm/(V·cm)
(i)Electric potential gradient (volts/cm)V/cm
(z)Depth of soil stabilizedcm
(a)Effective spacing between wellscm
  • (k_g) assumed same for sands, silts, and clays.

3. Precautions (Clause 11.2)

  • To maintain groundwater levels:
    • Discharge water into absorption ditch at ground level for shallow deposits.
    • Use recharging wells to maintain head in lower pervious layers.

4. Usage Notes (Appendix B)

  • Electro-osmosis is costly; apply only if soil permeability is very low.
  • Effective for soils where capillary forces hinder gravity drainage.

flowchart LR
    A[Electric Field Applied] --> B[Pore Water Movement]
    B --> C[Water Collected at Wells]
    C --> D[Discharge to Absorption Ditch or Recharging Wells]

Summary: Use electro-osmosis for low permeability soils (<0.5×10⁻⁴ cm/sec). Calculate discharge using (Q = -k_g i z / a) and ensure proper water disposal to maintain groundwater equilibrium.

12Hydraulic Calculations and Flow Formulas

IS 9759: Hydraulic Calculations & Flow Formulas Summary

Key Discharge Formulas (Clause 6.2, 6.2.2)

Slot PenetrationFlow ConditionDischarge FormulaRemarks
Fully penetrating slotArtesian( Q = k D x L (H - h_e) )(H) = original groundwater level, (h_e) = water level at use, (L) = slot length, (D) = pervious stratum depth
Gravity( Q = 0.57 (H - h_e) k x 2L )
Partially penetrating slotArtesian( Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) (L + Y D) )(Y) depends on slot penetration ratio (see Fig. 2)
Gravity( Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k x 2L (H' - h_{2e}) )(H') = penetration into previous stratum
  • For fully penetrating slots, flow is twice that from Table 2 (single line source).
  • At distances (y > 1.3 D) from slot, head (h) varies linearly:
    [ h = h_e + (H - h_e) \frac{y + D}{L + y D} ]

Corrections for Well Penetration (Clause 1.10)

[ H - h = (n + \ln \frac{a}{r_w}) \frac{Q}{2 \pi k D} \quad \text{(Fully penetrating wells)} ]

[ H - h = \text{(similar form with correction factor for partial penetration)} ]

  • (a) = well spacing, (r_w) = effective well radius, (f_a) = uplift factor (depends on penetration).

Notations

SymbolMeaning
(Q)Discharge (flow rate)
(k)Hydraulic conductivity
13Pump Selection and Performance

IS 9759: Key Formulas & Specifications for Pump Selection and Performance


1. Horse Power of Pump (Clause 6.3.7)

Calculate required pump horsepower (HP) as:

[ \text{Horse Power} = \frac{\text{Total discharge (gpm)} \times \text{Total dynamic head (m)}}{3960 \times \text{Efficiency}} ]

  • Total dynamic head = Operating vacuum at pump intake - Discharge friction losses
  • Efficiency = Combined pump and engine efficiency (decimal)

2. Selection of Deep Well Pumps (Clause 6.3.13.6)

  • Use turbines or submersible pumps for wells ≥ 150 mm diameter.
  • Select pump capacity based on Table 8 (approximate max capacity).
  • Pumps should operate at normal rated speeds; higher speeds increase capacity (margin of safety).

3. Wellpoint Pumps (Clause 6.3.10 & 6.3.10.1)

  • Vacuum Pumps:

    • Use self-priming centrifugal pumps with vacuum pumps.
    • Typical vacuum developed: 6 to 7.5 m (design with 6 m vacuum).
    • Must handle air volume and produce high vacuum.
  • Jet-eductor Pumps:

    • Suitable for lowering water table > 4.5 m with low flow (<10-15 gpm).
    • Can lower water table by 15 to 30 m.
    • Use single-stage wellpoint systems with jet-eductor pumps.

Summary Table (Example)

ParameterValue/Range
Vacuum for wellpoint pump6 to 7.5 m (design 6 m)
Well diameter for deep pumps≥ 150 mm
Jet-eductor lowering capacity15 to 30 m
Flow rate for jet-eductor< 10-15 gpm

flowchart TD
    A[Pump Selection] --> B[Calculate HP]
    B --> C{Total Discharge x Head}
    C --> D[Divide by 3960 x Efficiency]
    A --> E[Select Pump Type]
    E --> F[Deep Well Pump (≥150 mm)]
    E --> G
14Maintenance and Troubleshooting

Maintenance and Troubleshooting per IS 9759

1. Discharge Formulae (Clause 6.2)

  • Fully penetrating wells:

[ H - h = \frac{n + \ln\left(\frac{a}{r_w}\right)}{k D} \times Q ]

  • Partially penetrating wells:

[ H - h = f_a \times \frac{n + \ln\left(\frac{a}{r_w}\right)}{k D} \times Q ]

Where:

  • (H) = Original groundwater level
  • (h) = Drawdown at well
  • (a) = Well spacing
  • (D) = Depth of pervious stratum
  • (r_w) = Effective well radius
  • (f_a) = Uplift factor (depends on penetration)

2. Filter Design for Piping Prevention (Clause 6.3.5)

Filter Type(R_{50} = \frac{D_{50}^{filter}}{D_{50}^{soil}})(R_{15} = \frac{D_{15}^{filter}}{D_{15}^{soil}})
Uniform (U=3-4)5 to 10--
Well graded, subrounded12 to 5812 to 40
Well graded, angular9 to 306 to 18
  • Proper filter design prevents piping under high hydraulic gradients.

3. Maintenance & Troubleshooting Tips

  • Standby Equipment: Keep standby pumps ready for emergencies (Clause 6.3.10.5).
  • Regular Inspection: Check for clogging in filters and wells.
  • Pump Operation: Ensure continuous operation for wellpoint systems.
  • Noise & Vibration: Monitor for abnormal noise indicating pump or motor issues.
  • Water Level Monitoring: Regularly measure drawdown to detect system inefficiencies.

Quick Reference: Dewatering Methods (Table 1)

MethodSuitable SoilsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Sump PumpingClean gravels, coarse sandsSimple, low costInstability,

Popular Questions About IS 9759

?What are the recommended dewatering methods for different soil types according to IS 9759?

According to IS 9759 (1981), the recommended dewatering methods depend primarily on the soil type and particle size distribution:

Key Points:

  • Clause 5.1: Subsurface investigations determine soil type, guiding the dewatering method.
  • Clause 5.2: Particle size distribution (from sieve analysis) is plotted on a grading curve chart (Fig. 1) to select the suitable dewatering system.
  • Table I (general guidance) relates soil types to dewatering methods:
Soil TypeRecommended Dewatering Method
Coarse-grained soils (sand, gravel)Wellpoint systems, deep wells
Medium-grained soils (silty sand)Wellpoint systems, ejector wells
Fine-grained soils (clay, silts)Vacuum dewatering, electro-osmosis, or cut-off walls

Summary:

  • Coarse soils: Prefer wellpoints or deep wells due to high permeability.
  • Medium soils: Use wellpoints or ejector wells.
  • Fine soils: Use vacuum methods or electro-osmosis because permeability is low.

Loading diagram...

This approach ensures efficient and economical dewatering tailored to soil characteristics.

?How should the pump horsepower be calculated for a dewatering system?

Pump Horsepower Calculation (IS 9759 - Clause 6.3.7):

The required pump horsepower (HP) for a dewatering system is calculated by:

[ \text{Horse Power} = \frac{\text{Total discharge (gpm)} \times \text{Total dynamic head (m)}}{3960 \times \text{Efficiency}} ]

Where:

  • Total discharge = flow rate in gallons per minute (gpm)
  • Total dynamic head = Operating vacuum at pump intake (m) - discharge friction losses (m)
  • Efficiency = combined efficiency of pump and engine (decimal form, e.g., 0.7 for 70%)

Key Notes from IS 9759:

  • Operating vacuum is typically assumed as 6 m for wellpoint systems (Clause 6.3.10.1).
  • Total dynamic head includes vacuum head minus friction losses in pipes and fittings.
  • Ensure to account for friction losses in headers, wellpoints, riser pipes, and velocity head (Clause 6.3.4.5).
  • Use self-priming centrifugal pumps with vacuum pumps for efficient operation.

Summary:

ParameterUnitDescription
Total discharge (Q)gpmPump flow rate
Total dynamic head (H)metersVacuum head - friction losses
Efficiency (η)decimalPump + engine efficiency (e.g., 0.7)
Constant3960Conversion factor from IS 9759

Loading diagram...

Ensure:

  • Accurate estimation of vacuum and friction losses.
  • Use pump efficiency from manufacturer data.
  • Confirm pump capacity matches calculated HP for reliable dewatering.
?What are the design considerations for wellpoint and deep well systems?

Design Considerations for Wellpoint and Deep Well Systems (IS 9759)

  1. Determination of Key Parameters (Clause 6.1):

    • Number, size, spacing, and penetration depth of wellpoints or wells.
    • Rate of water removal needed to lower groundwater to the desired level.
  2. Design Procedure (Clause 6.3 & 6.3.13.2):

    • Deep well system design is similar to wellpoint systems.
    • Refer to Clauses 6.3.1 to 6.3.7 for detailed design steps (e.g., layout, yield calculations).
  3. Pump Selection for Deep Wells (Clause 6.3.13.6):

    • Use turbines or submersible pumps for wells ≥150 mm diameter.
    • Select pumps based on capacity, ensuring the pump—not the aquifer—limits discharge.
    • Refer to Table 8 for approximate pump capacities.
    • Pumps should operate at rated speeds; higher speeds provide extra capacity margin.
  4. Additional Notes:

    • Proper installation and operation per Clause 7 are essential for system efficiency.

Summary Table for Pump Selection (Example from Table 8)

Well Diameter (mm)Typical Pump Capacity (m³/hr)
15050 - 100
200100 - 200
300200 - 400

Loading diagram...

This approach ensures efficient dewatering by matching well design and pump capacity to site conditions.

?How does IS 9759 address dewatering in soils with low permeability like silts and clays?

IS 9759 addresses dewatering in low permeability soils (silts, clays) as follows:

  • Capillary forces in silts/clayey silts hinder gravity drainage.
  • Electro-osmosis (electrical drainage) is recommended when permeability is < 0.5 × 10⁻⁴ cm/sec. This method uses electrical flow to move pore water toward wells but is costly and used only when necessary.
  • Sand drains are suggested to overcome impervious layers (even as thin as 3 mm) within sandy soils. These are sand-filled holes near wellpoints that provide seepage paths, preventing drawdown breaks and side weeping.
  • For soils with higher permeability, wells, wellpoints, vacuum, and gravel filters are used according to grain size (see Fig.1 in Clause 2.5).

Summary Table: Dewatering Methods vs Soil Permeability

Soil TypePermeability (cm/sec)Recommended Method
Gravel, Sand> 10⁻⁴Wells, wellpoints, vacuum
Silts, Clays< 0.5 × 10⁻⁴Electro-osmosis, sand drains
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures effective dewatering even in challenging low permeability soils.

?What safety measures are advised to prevent excavation instability during dewatering?

To prevent excavation instability during dewatering as per IS 9759, key safety measures include:

  • Clear standing water from excavation floor by digging a small ditch around the bottom, sloping towards a sump to control water flow velocity and prevent erosion.
  • Use boards, stone, or concrete paving across the ditch for erosion control.
  • Install open-jointed pipes surrounded by graded stone or gravel filter to facilitate drainage.
  • Design and operate the dewatering system to:
    • Lower the water table and intercept seepage.
    • Increase slope stability and prevent material loss.
    • Reduce lateral loads on supports.
    • Prevent bottom heaving and provide a safe working surface.
  • Control surface water runoff with dikes, ditches, sumps, pumps, and slope protection like mulching and seeding to avoid flooding and erosion.
  • Conduct thorough subsurface investigation (boring/jetting) to understand soil characteristics for appropriate dewatering design.

Summary Diagram of Dewatering Safety Measures

Loading diagram...

Remember: Proper design, installation, and maintenance of dewatering and erosion control systems are critical for excavation safety.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 9759. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required