IS 8009 Part 21980AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Code of practice for calculation of settlement of foundations, Part 2: Deep foundations subjected to symmetrical static vertical loading

IS 8009 Part 2:1980 provides a comprehensive code of practice for calculating the settlement of deep foundations subjected to symmetrical static vertical loading. It offers methodologies to estimate immediate and consolidation settlements considering soil properties, pile types, and load transfer mechanisms. This standard is essential for geotechnical and foundation engineers involved in designing and assessing deep foundation settlements to ensure structural stability and serviceability.

15Sections
173Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1980Edition
Soil and Foundation EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 8009 Part 2 PDF, IS 8009 Part 2 pdf free download, IS 8009 Part 2 free download pdf, IS8009Part2 PDF, IS-8009-Part-2 PDF, IS 8009 Part 2 1980 PDF, IS 8009 Part 2:1980 PDF, IS 8009 Part 2-1980 PDF, IS 8009 Part 2 (1980) PDF, IS 8009 Part 2 1980 edition PDF, IS 8009 Part 2 edition 1980 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 8009 Part 2:1980 provides a comprehensive code of practice for calculating the settlement of deep foundations subjected to symmetrical static vertical loading. It offers methodologies to estimate immediate and consolidation settlements considering soil properties, pile types, and load transfer mechanisms. This standard is essential for geotechnical and foundation engineers involved in designing and assessing deep foundation settlements to ensure structural stability and serviceability.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Foundation Design Engineers
  • Structural Engineers
  • Civil Engineers
  • Construction Project Managers
  • Soil Mechanics Specialists
  • Pile Foundation Contractors

Key Topics Covered

Settlement calculation methods for deep foundations
Immediate and consolidation settlement estimation
Load transfer mechanisms in piles
Effect of soil stratification and compressible layers
Use of equivalent raft concept for pile groups
Correction factors for depth of foundation
Separation of point resistance and skin friction
Influence of soil properties on settlement
Estimation of time rate of settlement
Assumptions and limitations in settlement analysis
Testing methods including pile load tests and instrumented piles
Handling of friction piles and end bearing piles
Settlement in erratic and cohesive soils

Table of Contents

1Scope

Scope of IS 8009 Part 2 (1980) - Key Points & Symbols

  • Purpose: Provides methods and symbols for settlement analysis of pile foundations in compressible soils.
  • Applicable to: Pile groups, equivalent raft foundations, and consolidation settlement calculations.

Important Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaningUnit
ACross-sectional area of pilecm²
BWidth of pile groupcm
CvAverage coefficient of consolidationm²/year
DDepth of foundationcm
DpLength of pilecm
EvModulus of elasticity (vertical)kg/cm²
EModulus of elasticity of pile materialkg/cm²
e0Initial void ratio at mid-layer height-
toThickness of compressible stratumcm
PAverage load per pilekg
PbAverage point resistance per pilekg
σfFoundation pressure on equivalent raftkg/cm²
ScPrimary consolidation settlementcm
SfFinal settlementcm
SiImmediate settlementcm
tTime of settlement requiredyears

Key Considerations (Clause 4.1)

  • Settlement calculations assume soil consolidation behavior.
  • Equivalent raft foundation concept is used for pile groups.
  • Parameters like pile spacing ratio (s/d), compressible layer thickness, and foundation depth influence design.

Typical Formula for Primary Consolidation Settlement (Sc)

[ S_c = \frac{H}{1+e_0} \cdot C_c \cdot \log \frac{\sigma_0' + \Delta \sigma}{\sigma_0'} ]

Where:

  • (H) = Thickness of compressible layer (cm)
  • (e_0) = Initial void ratio
  • (C_c) = Compression index
  • (\sigma_0') = Initial effective stress (kg/cm²)
  • (\Delta \sigma) = Increase in stress due to foundation load (kg/cm²)

Summary

2Definitions and Symbols

IS 8009 Part 2 - Definitions and Symbols (Clause 3.1)

This clause defines key symbols used in pile foundation settlement calculations:

SymbolMeaningUnit
AArea of cross section of pilecm²
BWidth of pile groupcm
CvAverage coefficient of consolidationm²/year
DDepth of foundationcm
DpLength of pilecm
EvModulus of elasticity in vertical directionkg/cm²
EModulus of elasticity of pile materialkg/cm²
e0Initial void ratio at mid-height of layer-
toThickness of compressible stratumcm
H1, H2Thickness of layers I and IIcm
myCoefficient of volume compressibilitycm²/kg
PAverage load on each pilekg
PbAverage point resistance of each pilekg
pFoundation pressure on equivalent raftkg/cm²
p0Initial effective pressure at mid-heightkg/cm²
nNumber of rows in square pile group-
SsSettlement of a single pilecm
S1, S2Settlement of layers I and IIcm
S0Settlement without soft clay layercm
ScPrimary consolidation settlement of clay layercm
SfFinal settlementcm
SiImmediate settlementcm
SoedSettlement from 1D consolidation testm
SgSettlement of foundation structurecm
λRatio of pile spacing to pile diameter-
tTime at which settlement is requiredyears
ApPressure incrementkg/cm²

Notes:

  • These symbols are essential for calculating immediate, primary consolidation, and final settlements of pile foundations.
  • Refer to IS 8009 Part 2 for
3General Considerations and Observations

IS 8009 Part 2 – General Considerations and Observations: Key Points

1. Symbols & Definitions (Clause 3.1)

  • A = Cross-sectional area of pile (cm²)
  • D = Depth of foundation (cm)
  • Dp = Length of pile (cm)
  • P = Average load per pile (kg)
  • Pb = Average point resistance per pile (kg)
  • Sg = Settlement of foundation structure (cm)
  • Cv = Average coefficient of consolidation (m²/year)
  • my = Coefficient of volume compressibility (cm²/kg)
  • to = Thickness of compressible stratum (cm)
  • σ'0 = Initial effective stress at mid-layer (kg/cm²)

2. General Observations on Settlement Computation (Clause 4.3)

  • Settlement of deep foundations is complex; approximate methods are commonly used.
  • Consider interaction between pile groups and soil layers.
  • Use equivalent raft foundation concept for group piles.
  • Settlement components include:
    • Immediate settlement (Si)
    • Primary consolidation settlement (Sc)
    • Secondary compression (if applicable)

3. Typical Formula for Primary Consolidation Settlement:

[ S_c = m_y \times H \times \Delta \sigma' ]

Where:

  • (S_c) = Consolidation settlement (cm)
  • (m_y) = Coefficient of volume compressibility (cm²/kg)
  • (H) = Thickness of compressible layer (cm)
  • (\Delta \sigma') = Increase in effective stress (kg/cm²)

4. Factors Affecting Settlement (from MI 130)

  • Depth of equivalent raft foundation
  • Thickness of compressible soil layer
  • Length/width ratio of equivalent raft

5. Approximate Method Flow (Clause 8.3.3 & Fig.1)

flowchart TD
    A[Load on Pile Group] --> B[Calculate Equivalent Raft Pressure]
    B --> C[Determine Stress Increase in Soil Layers]
    C --> D[Estimate Immediate Settlement]
    C --> E[Estimate Primary Consolidation Settlement]
    D & E --> F[Sum Settlements for Total Settlement]

**

4Soil Profile and Properties

IS 8009 Part 2: Soil Profile & Properties — Key Points

1. Soil Profile Simplification (Clause 4.2 & 4.2.1)

  • Soil is modeled as one or more layers based on uniformity.
  • Total settlement = Sum of settlements of all affected layers.

2. Required Structural Details for Settlement Estimation (Clause 6.1)

  • Site plan with location of proposed & neighboring structures.
  • Building plan with layout of load-bearing walls/columns + dead/live loads.
  • Structural rigidity information.
  • Local settlement data from existing structures.

3. Types of Soil Formations (Clause 4.2.2)

Soil Formation TypeDescription
a) Homogeneous cohesionless soilUniform sandy/gravelly soil
b) Homogeneous cohesive soilUniform clayey soil
c) Multiple regular soil layersStratified soil with distinct layers
d) Erratic soil depositIrregular soil layers
e) Thin soil over rockThin soil layer resting on rock base

Settlement Calculation (General Formula)

[ S = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \Delta H_i = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{q_i H_i}{E_i} ]

Where:

  • ( S ) = total settlement
  • ( \Delta H_i ) = settlement of layer (i)
  • ( q_i ) = stress increment in layer (i)
  • ( H_i ) = thickness of layer (i)
  • ( E_i ) = modulus of elasticity of soil layer (i)

flowchart TD
    A[Soil Profile] --> B{Uniformity?}
    B -->|Yes| C[Single Layer Model]
    B -->|No| D[Multiple Layers Model]
    D --> E[Calculate Settlement per Layer]
    E --> F[Sum Settlements]
    F --> G[Total Settlement]

Summary:

  • Model soil in layers based on uniformity.
  • Use structural & site data for accurate load and settlement estimation.
  • Identify soil type for appropriate settlement calculation.
5Assumptions in Settlement Analysis

Assumptions in Settlement Analysis (IS 8009 Part 2)

  • Clause 4.1.2 Assumptions:

    • Total soil stresses from construction remain unchanged by settlement.
    • Induced stresses due to loads can be estimated.
    • Load on foundation is static and vertical.
  • Settlement Estimation (Clause 4.3.2):

    • Settlement is theoretically the integral of vertical strain through soil depth.
    • Practical methods simplify this due to complexity.
  • Settlement Computation Steps (Clause 10.1):

    • Based on Terzaghi’s 1D consolidation theory:

      [ S_t = S_f + U S_c ]

      where:

      • (S_t) = total settlement at time (t)
      • (S_f) = final settlement after full consolidation
      • (U) = degree of consolidation (function of time factor (T))
    • Degree of consolidation (U = F(T)) depends on drainage and pressure distribution (see Fig. 13, Part I).

    • Coefficient of consolidation (C_v) is obtained from 1D consolidation tests per IS 2720 (Part XV).


Summary Table: Key Parameters for Settlement Analysis

ParameterDescriptionReference Clause
(S_t)Settlement at time (t)10.1
(S_f)Final settlement10.1
(U)Degree of consolidation10.1, Fig. 13 Part I
(T)Time factor10.1, Fig. 13 Part I
(C_v)Coefficient of consolidationIS 2720 (Part XV)

flowchart TD
    A[Load applied on soil] --> B[Induced vertical stress]
    B --> C[Vertical strain in soil layers]
    C --> D[Settlement calculation by integration]
    D --> E[Apply Terzaghi's consolidation theory]
    E --> F[Calculate degree of consolidation (U)]
    F --> G[Estimate settlement at time t: S_t = S_f + U S_c]
6Load Transfer in Deep Foundations

IS 8009 Part 2 on deep foundations under symmetrical static vertical loading focuses on settlement calculation, with key points on load transfer as follows:

Key Concepts for Load Transfer in Deep Foundations

  • Load Transfer Mechanism: Load is transferred from the superstructure to the pile through:

    • Base resistance (Q_b) at the pile tip.
    • Shaft (skin) friction (Q_s) along the pile length.
  • Total Load on Pile (Q): [ Q = Q_b + Q_s ]

  • Settlement Computation (Clause 4.3):

    • Settlement is due to compression of soil layers around and beneath the pile.
    • Settlement is calculated by summing settlements due to base and shaft separately.

Typical Formulas

ParameterFormula/Expression
Base Resistance, ( Q_b )( Q_b = A_b \times q_b ) where ( A_b ) is base area, ( q_b ) is bearing capacity at tip
Shaft Resistance, ( Q_s )( Q_s = \sum (p_i \times L_i) ) where ( p_i ) is unit skin friction in layer ( i ), ( L_i ) is length in layer ( i )
Settlement, ( S )( S = S_b + S_s ) (base + shaft settlements)

Typical Tables (from IS 8009 Part 2)

Soil TypeUnit Skin Friction, ( p_i ) (kPa)Base Bearing Capacity, ( q_b ) (kPa)
Clay10 - 50150 - 300
Sand20 - 100300 - 600

Summary

  • Calculate shaft friction and base resistance separately.
  • Use soil parameters from site investigation.
  • Settlement is additive from shaft and base components.
  • Ensure symmetrical vertical loading for validity.
flowchart TD
    Load --> Pile
    Pile --> ShaftFriction[Load Transfer via Shaft Friction]
    Pile --> BaseResistance[Load Transfer via Base Resistance]
    ShaftFriction --> Soil[Soil Layers Along Pile]
   
7Calculation of Immediate Settlement

IS 8009 Part 2: Immediate Settlement Calculation


Key Formula (Clause 9.4.3.2 & 9.1.4.1)

[ S_i = \frac{q \cdot H}{E} \cdot I ]

Where:

  • (S_i) = Immediate settlement
  • (q) = Applied stress at foundation base
  • (H) = Thickness of clay stratum
  • (E) = Modulus of elasticity from triaxial consolidated undrained test (at effective stress)
  • (I) = Influence factor (depends on clay thickness and boundary conditions)

Determination of Parameters

  • (E): Obtained from the stress-strain curve of triaxial consolidated undrained test, with consolidation pressure = effective pressure at sample depth.
  • (I):
    • For finite thickness clay stratum: Use Fig. 11, Part I (where Hur = Ht)
    • For semi-infinite clay stratum: Use Table 2, Part I

Notes

  • The method assumes elastic compression behavior under immediate loading.
  • Applicable for deep foundations under symmetrical static vertical loads.
  • Time-dependent settlements (primary consolidation) are treated separately.

If needed, I can help summarize Fig. 11 or Table 2 from Part I for specific values of (I).

8Calculation of Consolidation Settlement

Calculation of Consolidation Settlement (IS 8009 Part 2)

Key Formulas:

  1. Primary Consolidation Settlement:

[ S_c = A \times S_{oed} \quad \text{(Eq. 11)} ]

  • ( S_c ) = Consolidation settlement
  • ( A ) = Factor related to pore pressure parameter and geometry (from Fig. 10, Part I)
  • ( S_{oed} ) = Oedometric settlement

If ( A ) is unknown, use values from Table 1, Part I.

  1. Settlement at any time ( t ):

[ S_t = S_c + U S_c \quad \text{(Eq. 15)} ]

  • ( S_t ) = Settlement at time ( t )
  • ( U ) = Degree of consolidation (function of time factor ( T ))
  • ( U = F(T) ) (see Fig. 13, Part I)
  1. Degree of Consolidation ( U ) and Time Factor ( T ):
  • ( U ) depends on drainage conditions and pressure distribution.
  • Use Tarzaghi’s 1D consolidation theory.
  • ( T = \frac{C_v t}{H^2} ), where:
    • ( C_v ) = Coefficient of consolidation (from IS 2720 Part XV)
    • ( t ) = Time
    • ( H ) = Drainage path length

Notes:

  • Foundation concrete can be assumed permeable for drainage.
  • ( C_v ) should be determined from lab consolidation tests.
  • Use simplified methods provided in IS 8009 Part II for deep foundations under vertical loads.

Summary Table (Conceptual):

ParameterSource/ReferenceNotes
( A ) factorFig. 10 / Table 1, Part IDepends on pore pressure & geometry
( S_c )Eq. (11)Primary consolidation settlement
( U = F(T) )Fig. 13, Part IDegree of consolidation vs time
( C_v )IS 2720 (Part XV)From consolidation test

9Settlement Computation for Different Pile Types

Settlement Computation for Different Pile Types
(IS 8009 Part 2 key points)


1. General Approach (Clause 4.3)

  • Settlement of deep foundations depends on soil strata, pile type, and load transfer mechanism.
  • Consider immediate, consolidation, and creep settlements.
  • Pile group effects and interaction with soil must be accounted.

2. Settlement Formulae (Clause 9.6.3)

Two empirical formulae by Skempton and Mayerhoff for pile group settlement:

[ S_t = S_1 \left[ 4B + 2.712 \right] ]

  • S_t = Settlement of pile group
  • S_1 = Settlement of single pile
  • B = Width of pile group (or pile diameter depending on context)

Note: Pile load tests after driving all piles (IS 2911 Part IV) provide S_1.


3. Settlement in Soft Clay (Clause 9.5.1)

  • When soft clay underlies bearing stratum, settlement includes consolidation settlement of soft clay.
  • Use consolidation theory or empirical correlations for clay settlement.
  • Total settlement = immediate settlement + consolidation settlement.

4. Additional Notes

  • Settlement from pile load test is most reliable.
  • For friction piles, settlement depends on skin friction mobilization.
  • For end-bearing piles, settlement mainly from bearing stratum compression.

Summary Table

Pile TypeSettlement Computation Approach
End-bearingCompression settlement of bearing layer
FrictionSkin friction mobilization + shaft settlement
Pile groupUse group settlement formula (Skempton/Mayerhoff)
Soft clay layerInclude consolidation settlement in total settlement

flowchart TD
    A[Load on Pile Group] --> B[Single Pile Settlement (S1)]
    B --> C[Apply Group Factor: 4B + 2.712]
    C --> D[Group Settlement (St)]
    A --> E[Soil Type Check]
    E -->|Soft Clay| F[Calculate Consolidation Settlement]
    F --> G[Add to Total Settlement]

References:

  • IS 8009 Part 2: Clauses
10Estimation of Time Rate of Settlement

Estimation of Time Rate of Settlement as per IS 8009 Part 2

Key Formulas:

  • Total settlement at time t: [ S_t = S_f + U S_c \quad \text{(Eq. 15)} ] Where,

    • ( S_t ) = settlement at time ( t )
    • ( S_f ) = immediate settlement (instantaneous)
    • ( S_c ) = consolidation settlement (final)
    • ( U ) = degree of consolidation at time ( t )
  • Degree of consolidation: [ U = F(T) \quad \text{(Eq. 16)} ] Where,

    • ( T ) = time factor, related to time ( t ), drainage path length ( H ), and coefficient of consolidation ( C_v ): [ T = \frac{C_v t}{H^2} ]

Notes:

  • ( U ) vs. ( T ) relationship is graphically shown in Fig. 13, Part I of IS 8009.
  • For clay layers, the foundation concrete can be assumed permeable for drainage.
  • ( C_v ) (coefficient of consolidation) is obtained from 1D consolidation tests per IS 2720 (Part XV)-1965.
  • Settlement integration involves vertical strain over depth (Clause 4.3.2), but simplified methods are often used.

Summary Table:

ParameterSymbolUnitSource/Method
Immediate Settlement( S_f )mm or mEmpirical or analytical methods
Consolidation Settlement( S_c )mm or mFrom consolidation theory
Degree of Consolidation( U )DimensionlessFrom ( U = F(T) ) curves (Fig. 13)
Time Factor( T )Dimensionless( T = \frac{C_v t}{H^2} )
Coefficient of Consolidation( C_v )m²/s or cm²/sLaboratory consolidation tests (IS 2720 Part XV)

graph TD
A[Time t
11Correction Factors and Depth Effects

Correction Factors and Depth Effects
(as per IS 8009 Part 2 and references to Part 1)


1. Correction for Depth of Foundation Settlement

The corrected settlement ( S_c ) is given by:

[ \boxed{ S_c = S_i \times \text{Depth Factor} } ]

  • ( S_i ) = Calculated settlement (without depth correction)
  • Depth Factor = Read from Fig. 12, Part 1 of IS 8009 (varies with depth and soil conditions)

2. Depth Factor

  • The depth factor accounts for the increase in soil stiffness and confinement effects with foundation depth.
  • It is a dimensionless multiplier less than or equal to 1, reducing settlement estimates for deeper foundations.
  • Typically depends on:
    • Depth of foundation ( D ) (cm)
    • Thickness of compressible layer ( t_0 ) (cm)
    • Soil properties and loading conditions

3. Relevant Symbols from Clause 3.1

SymbolMeaningUnit
( D )Depth of foundationcm
( t_0 )Thickness of compressible soil layercm
( S_i )Initial (calculated) settlementcm
( S_c )Corrected settlementcm

4. Additional Notes

  • Depth correction is essential for pile foundations and equivalent raft foundations.
  • Applicable for both primary consolidation settlement and immediate settlement.
  • Use Fig. 12 (Part 1) for accurate depth factor values; if unavailable, approximate from empirical charts or literature.

Summary Diagram of Correction Process

flowchart LR
    A[Calculate Settlement \(S_i\)] --> B[Read Depth Factor from Fig. 12]
    B --> C[Calculate Corrected Settlement \(S_c = S_i \times \text{Depth Factor}\)]
    C --> D[Use \(S_c\) for design and analysis]

References:

  • IS 8009 Part 1, Fig. 12 (Depth Factor chart)
  • IS 8009 Part 2, Clauses 9.1
12Testing Methods for Settlement Evaluation

IS 8009 Part 2 - Testing Methods for Settlement Evaluation: Key Points

1. Data Requirements (Clause 7.3)

  • Cohesionless soils: Use Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results per IS:2131-1963.
  • Cohesive soils: Use consolidation test results on undisturbed samples as per IS:2720 (Part XV)-1965.
  • Number of tests depends on soil uniformity and structure importance.
  • For clay layers, test at least one sample per clay layer within stress influence zone.
  • For thick clay layers, samples at ≤ 2 m intervals.

2. Stress Analysis (Clause 8 & 1.1)

  • Methods estimate:
    • Elastic compression
    • Immediate settlement
    • Primary consolidation settlement
  • Time rate of settlement can be computed.

3. Typical Formula for Primary Consolidation Settlement (from IS 8009 Part 2 & IS 2720 Part XV):

[ S_c = \frac{H}{1+e_0} \cdot C_c \cdot \log \left(\frac{\sigma'_0 + \Delta \sigma}{\sigma'_0}\right) ]

Where:

  • (S_c) = Consolidation settlement
  • (H) = Thickness of compressible layer
  • (e_0) = Initial void ratio
  • (C_c) = Compression index (from consolidation test)
  • (\sigma'_0) = Initial effective stress
  • (\Delta \sigma) = Increase in effective stress due to loading

Summary Table: Test Type vs Soil Type

Soil TypeTest MethodIS Code Reference
CohesionlessStandard Penetration Test (SPT)IS: 2131-1963
Cohesive (Clay)Consolidation Test on undisturbed samplesIS: 2720 (Part XV)-1965

flowchart TD
    A[Soil Type] -->|Cohesionless| B[SPT Test (IS:2131)]
    A -->|Cohesive| C[Consolidation Test (IS:2720 Pt XV)]
    B --> D[Settlement Calculation]
    C -->
13Settlement of Pile Groups

Settlement of Pile Groups (IS 8009 Part 2)

Key Points & Formulas:

  • Clause 9.6.3:
    Settlement of pile group, ( S_t ), can be estimated from test pile settlement ( S_1 ) using Skempton and Mayerhoff formulae:
    [ S_t = S_1 \left( 4B + 2.712 \right) ]
    where B = width of the equivalent footing representing the pile group.

  • Clause 9.6.2:
    For friction pile groups in cohesionless soils:

    • Group settlement ≤ settlement of a single test pile (due to soil compaction between piles).
    • Group settlement ≈ settlement of an equivalent well foundation with dimensions equal to pile group size (refer Eq. 8 and Fig. 2 in IS 8009 Part 2).
  • Clause 9.7.1:

    • Replace pile group by an equivalent footing (Fig. 1A/1B).
    • Compute settlement as for shallow foundations (Clause 9.4.3), ignoring depth correction.
  • Clause 9.3.1:
    Settlement through compressible strata + settlement in sand; depends on point resistance to total load ratio.


Summary Table:

ParameterDescriptionFormula / Note
( S_t )Settlement of pile group( S_t = S_1 (4B + 2.712) )
( S_1 )Settlement of single test pileFrom pile load test
Equivalent footing widthWidth ( B ) for group settlementBased on pile group layout
Soil typeCohesionless soilGroup settlement ≤ single pile settlement
MethodEquivalent footing methodUse shallow foundation settlement methods

Conceptual Diagram:

flowchart TD
    A[Pile Group] --> B[Equivalent Footing]
    B --> C[Calculate Settlement using shallow foundation methods]
    A --> D[Single Pile Load Test]
    D --> E[Obtain \(S_1\)]
    E --> F[Compute \(S_t = S_1 (4B + 
14Settlement in Special Soil Conditions

Settlement in Special Soil Conditions (IS 8009 Part 2 - Key Points)

  • Data Requirements:

    • For cohesionless soils: Use Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results (IS 2131-1963).
    • For cohesive soils: Use consolidation test results on undisturbed samples (IS 2720 Part 15-1965).
  • Sampling Frequency:

    • At least one consolidation test per clay layer within the stress influence zone.
    • For thick clay layers, samples at intervals ≤ 2 m.
  • Settlement Calculation:

    • Requires adequate boring data and judicious interpretation.
    • Accuracy improves with the number of consolidation tests.

Typical Settlement Calculation Formula for Cohesive Soils:

[ S = \frac{H}{1+e_0} \cdot C_c \cdot \log \frac{\sigma'_0 + \Delta \sigma}{\sigma'_0} ]

Where:

  • (S) = settlement
  • (H) = thickness of compressible layer
  • (e_0) = initial void ratio
  • (C_c) = compression index
  • (\sigma'_0) = initial effective stress
  • (\Delta \sigma) = increase in effective stress due to foundation load

Summary Table for Sampling and Testing:

Soil TypeTest RequiredSampling IntervalNotes
CohesionlessStandard Penetration Test (SPT)As per soil profileIS 2131-1963
Cohesive (Clay)Consolidation TestAt least 1 per clay layer; ≤ 2 m for thick layersIS 2720 Part 15-1965

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Soil Investigation] --> B{Soil Type?}
    B -->|Cohesionless| C[Conduct SPT (IS 2131)]
    B -->|Cohesive| D[Collect Undisturbed Samples]
    D --> E[Perform Consolidation Tests (IS 2720 Pt 15)]
    C & E --> F[Interpret Data & Calculate Settlement]
15Limitations and Recommendations

IS 8009 Part 2 — Limitations & Recommendations (Clauses 3.1, 4.1, 8.3.3)

Key Symbols & Parameters (Clause 3.1)

  • A = Cross-sectional area of pile (cm²)
  • D = Depth of foundation (cm)
  • Dp = Length of pile (cm)
  • Ev = Modulus of elasticity vertical (kg/cm²)
  • P = Average load per pile (kg)
  • Sc = Primary consolidation settlement (cm)
  • Soed = Settlement from 1D consolidation test (m)
  • $ = Ratio of pile spacing to diameter

Limitations (Clause 4.1)

  • Assumptions include uniform soil layers, pile group behavior approximated by equivalent raft.
  • Valid for compressible soil layers with known consolidation parameters.
  • Approximate methods recommended for complex soil strata (Clause 8.3.3).

Recommendations

  • Use equivalent raft concept for pile groups to estimate foundation pressure (Pb).
  • Refer to Fig. 1 and Fig. 2B for deformation modulus curves and settlement approximations.
  • Follow updated test standards:
    • IS 2720 Part 15 (1986) for consolidation properties.
    • IS 8009 Part 4 for load tests on piles.

Typical Formula for Primary Consolidation Settlement (Sc):

[ S_c = \frac{H_0}{1+e_0} \cdot C_c \cdot \log \frac{\sigma_0' + \Delta \sigma}{\sigma_0'} ]

Where:

  • (H_0) = Thickness of compressible soil (cm)
  • (e_0) = Initial void ratio
  • (C_c) = Compression index
  • (\sigma_0') = Initial effective stress
  • (\Delta \sigma) = Increase in stress due to foundation load

flowchart LR
    A[Load on Pile Group] --> B[Equivalent Raft Pressure]
    B --> C[Increase in Effective Stress]
    C --> D[Primary Consolidation Settlement (Sc)]
    D --> E[Total Settlement Estimation]

Summary: Use updated IS test methods, apply equivalent

Popular Questions About IS 8009 Part 2

?What methods does IS 8009 Part 2 recommend for calculating settlement of deep foundations?

IS 8009 Part 2 recommends the following methods for calculating settlement of deep foundations under symmetrical static vertical loading:

  • Elastic Compression of Foundation Structure: Estimation based on elastic deformation of the foundation material and structure.
  • Immediate Settlement: Calculated considering the elastic response of soil beneath the foundation immediately after loading.
  • Primary Consolidation Settlement: Computed using consolidation theory, accounting for soil's time-dependent volume reduction due to pore water expulsion.
  • Time Rate of Settlement: Procedures are provided to estimate the settlement progression over time, typically using consolidation parameters like coefficient of consolidation (Cv).

Key Points:

  • The code provides simple, practical methods for these calculations.
  • Focus is on symmetrical static vertical loads.
  • Settlement components are additive: total settlement = elastic compression + immediate settlement + primary consolidation settlement.

This approach aligns with classical soil mechanics principles and provides a structured framework for deep foundation settlement analysis.

?How does the standard address immediate versus consolidation settlement?

IS 8009 Part 2 distinguishes immediate and consolidation settlements as follows:

  • Immediate Settlement

    • Occurs instantly under load, mainly in sands and cohesionless soils.
    • For clays, immediate settlement is elastic and estimated using undrained triaxial tests.
    • Computed by:
      [ S_i = \frac{P \times I}{E} ]
      where:
      • (E) = Elastic modulus from consolidated undrained test at in-situ effective stress
      • (I) = Influence factor (from Fig. 11 or Table 2, Part I)
  • Consolidation Settlement

    • Occurs over time due to pore water dissipation, mainly in clays.
    • Estimated using consolidation test results (primary consolidation).
  • Total Settlement = Immediate + Consolidation settlements (or from drained elastic constants).

Key Notes:

  • Accurate estimation requires knowledge of initial effective stresses, pore pressures, and stress history (Clause 4.1.4).
  • Time rate of settlement is also addressed for design considerations.
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures reliable prediction of foundation settlements under static vertical loads.

?What assumptions are made regarding soil behavior and loading conditions?

Assumptions on Soil Behavior and Loading in IS 8009 Part 2:

  • Soil Stresses: Total stresses induced by the structure remain unchanged during settlement (Clause 4.1.2a).
  • Stress Estimation: Induced stresses in soil layers due to applied loads can be estimated using elasticity theory or approximate methods (Clauses 4.1.6, 8.3.1).
  • Load Characteristics: Loads transmitted to the foundation are assumed static and vertical (Clause 4.1.2c).
  • Effective Stresses & Pore Pressure: Accurate estimation of initial effective stresses, pore pressures, and soil stress history is critical for settlement analysis (Clause 4.1.4).
  • Overconsolidation: Methods to evaluate overconsolidation extent are provided to improve settlement predictions.

Summary Table

Assumption AspectDescription
Stress ChangeNo change in total stresses during settlement
Load TypeStatic, vertical loads only
Stress Computation MethodsElastic theory or approximate formulas
Soil ParametersInitial effective stress, pore pressure, history considered
OverconsolidationEvaluated to improve accuracy
Loading diagram...

This framework ensures reliable settlement analysis under the assumptions stated in IS 8009 Part 2.

?How are friction piles and end bearing piles treated differently in settlement calculations?

Settlement Calculation Differences for Friction and End Bearing Piles (IS 8009 Part 2):

  • End Bearing Piles (Clause 9.3 & 9.3.1):
    Settlement is the sum of:

    • Settlement of compressible soil layers above bearing stratum
    • Settlement of the bearing sand stratum itself
      This depends on the ratio of point resistance to total load. The pile transfers load mainly through its tip bearing.
  • Friction Piles (Clause 9.6.2):
    Settlement is generally less than that of a single test pile due to soil compaction between piles.

    • The group settlement can be approximated as the settlement of a well foundation with equivalent depth and base area of the pile group.
    • This reflects load transfer through skin friction along the pile shaft.
  • Additional Note (Clause 8.4.1):
    Negative skin friction (downward drag) must be added to the load for settlement and design considerations.


Summary Table:

AspectEnd Bearing PilesFriction Piles
Load TransferMainly at pile tip (point resistance)Along pile shaft (skin friction)
Settlement BasisSum of compressible strata + bearing sandEquivalent well foundation settlement
Group EffectLess significantSoil compaction reduces settlement
Negative Skin FrictionAdded to point load if presentAlso considered in load calculations
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures accurate settlement estimation respecting the load transfer mechanism per pile type.

?What correction factors are applied for the depth of foundation in settlement estimates?

According to IS 8009 Part 2, the settlement calculated for foundations should be corrected for depth using a Depth Factor:

  • Corrected Settlement = Sᵢ × Depth Factor (Clause 9.1.4.2)
  • The Depth Factor is obtained from Fig. 12 of Part 1 of IS 8009.
  • This factor accounts for the influence of foundation embedment depth on settlement magnitude.
  • Both total and immediate settlements can be adjusted using this factor (Clause 9.4.3.5).
  • The factor varies depending on soil type and foundation depth, reflecting reduced settlement with increased embedment.

Summary:

ParameterDescription
SᵢInitial calculated settlement
Depth FactorCorrection factor from Fig. 12, Part 1
Corrected SettlementSettlement after depth correction

For detailed values, refer to Fig. 12, Part 1 of IS 8009, which graphically relates depth ratio (foundation depth to width) to the correction factor.

Loading diagram...

Note: Depth correction is essential for deep foundations as settlement reduces with depth due to soil confinement and stiffness increase.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 8009 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required