IS 7851998AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Reinforced Concrete Poles for Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines

IS 785:1998 specifies requirements for the design, materials, manufacture, testing, and marking of reinforced concrete poles used in overhead power, traction, and telecommunication lines. It applies to poles made with mechanical compaction methods and covers aspects such as transverse strength, planting depth, reinforcement, and curing. This standard is essential for manufacturers, engineers, and utilities involved in the production and deployment of durable, safe concrete poles for electrical and communication infrastructure.

12Sections
76Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1998Edition
Cement Matrix ProductsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 785 PDF, IS 785 pdf free download, IS 785 free download pdf, IS785 PDF, IS-785 PDF, IS 785 1998 PDF, IS 785:1998 PDF, IS 785-1998 PDF, IS 785 (1998) PDF, IS 785 1998 edition PDF, IS 785 edition 1998 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 785:1998 specifies requirements for the design, materials, manufacture, testing, and marking of reinforced concrete poles used in overhead power, traction, and telecommunication lines. It applies to poles made with mechanical compaction methods and covers aspects such as transverse strength, planting depth, reinforcement, and curing. This standard is essential for manufacturers, engineers, and utilities involved in the production and deployment of durable, safe concrete poles for electrical and communication infrastructure.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Structural Engineers
  • Manufacturers of Concrete Poles
  • Power Transmission Line Designers
  • Telecommunication Infrastructure Engineers
  • Quality Control Inspectors
  • Civil Engineers
  • Utility Companies

Key Topics Covered

Design requirements for reinforced concrete poles
Materials specifications including cement, aggregates, and reinforcement
Mechanical compaction methods for concrete
Transverse strength and load factors
Depth of planting and installation guidelines
Marking and identification of poles
Sampling, testing, and inspection procedures
Curing and protection of concrete
Tolerance limits for dimensions and straightness
Earthing provisions for poles
Handling and erection considerations
Compliance with referenced Indian Standards

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 785: Scope & Key Specifications

  • Scope: Defines standard requirements for poles (material, dimensions, strength).
  • Rounding Off: Final test/analysis values must be rounded per IS 2:1960, maintaining the same significant figures as specified.

Sampling & Testing (Clause 9.2.1)

No. of Poles in LotSample SizeMax Defectives (Dimensional)Max Defectives (Transverse Strength)
Up to 1001012
101 to 2001513
201 to 3002024
301 to 5003035
  • If any pole fails transverse strength, double the sample size is retested.
  • No failures in retest means lot acceptance.

Notes:

  • Number of poles tested is negotiable between purchaser & supplier.
  • Refer to Annex A for related Indian Standards (subject to revision).

This ensures quality control via statistically valid sampling and testing.

2Definitions

IS 785: Key Definitions & Specifications

1. Definitions (Clause 3.0)

  • Terms used in the standard are defined for clarity and uniform interpretation.
  • Final test or analysis results must be rounded off per IS 2:1960 rules.
  • Rounded values retain the same significant figures as specified values.

2. Formwork Requirements (Clause 7.4.1)

  • Forms must maintain shape during concrete placing and compaction.
  • Must be tight enough to prevent loss of concrete liquid.

3. Sampling & Testing (Clause 9.2.1)

Table: Number of Tests and Acceptance Criteria

No. of Poles in LotSample SizeMax Defective Poles (Dimensional)Max Defective Poles (Transverse Strength)
Up to 1001012
101 to 2001513
201 to 3002024
301 to 5003035
  • If failure occurs, double the sample size is retested.
  • No failures in retest → lot accepted.

Summary:

  • Use IS 2:1960 for rounding results.
  • Ensure formwork integrity during casting.
  • Follow sampling sizes and acceptance numbers from Table 9.2 for quality control.
flowchart TD
    A[Lot of Poles] --> B[Select Sample Size]
    B --> C{Test Poles}
    C -->|Pass| D[Lot Accepted]
    C -->|Fail| E[Double Sample Size]
    E --> F{Retest}
    F -->|Pass| D
    F -->|Fail| G[Lot Rejected]
3Materials

IS 785 - Materials: Key Specifications & References

Materials covered in IS 785 relate mainly to cement, aggregates, and reinforcement steel, referencing several IS standards:

MaterialIS Code & Title
Ordinary Portland Cement (33, 43, 53 grade)IS 269:1989, IS 8112:1989, IS 12269:1987
Portland Pozzolana CementIS 1489 (Part 1 & 2):1991
Portland Slag CementIS 455:1989
Rapid Hardening Portland CementIS 8041:1990
Aggregates (Coarse & Fine)IS 383:1970
Reinforcement Steel (Mild, Medium tensile, High strength deformed bars)IS 432 (Part 1 & 2):1982, IS 1786:1985

Important Notes:

  • Material Quality must comply with the respective IS specifications for strength, grading, and durability.
  • Forms and Molds (Clause 7.4.1): Must maintain shape during concrete placement and prevent loss of liquid.
  • Rounding Off: Test results are rounded per IS 2:1960 rules.

Typical Material Properties (from referenced IS codes):

MaterialCharacteristic StrengthRemarks
OPC 43 Grade43 MPa (28-day compressive strength)IS 8112
Coarse AggregateMax size 20mm (typical)IS 383
High Strength Deformed BarsYield strength ≥ 500 MPaIS 1786

For detailed mix design or reinforcement detailing, refer to IS 456:1978 (Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code).

flowchart LR
    Cement --> Concrete
    Aggregates --> Concrete
    Water --> Concrete
    Admixtures --> Concrete
    Steel --> Reinforced_Concrete
    Concrete --> Structure
    Reinforced_Concrete --> Structure

Summary: IS 785 refers to established IS standards for materials — cement, aggregates, steel — ensuring quality and compliance for concrete products.

4Overall Length of Poles

Overall Length of Poles (IS 785 Key Points):

  • Clause 6.3 - Depth of Planting (Table 1):
Length of Pole (m)Minimum Depth of Planting (m)
6.0 to 7.01.20
7.5 to 9.01.50
  • Clause 3.5 - Working Load:
    The maximum transverse load is assumed acting 600 mm below the top with the pole planted to the required depth.

  • Clause 9.1.3 & 9.2.1 - Sampling & Testing:
    Poles are selected per Table 2 (lot size based), tested for:

    • Overall length
    • Cross-section
    • Uprightness

    Poles failing any are defective; acceptance based on sample defect limits.


Summary Formula for Overall Length:

[ L_{overall} = L_{above\ ground} + D_{planting} ]

Where:

  • (L_{overall}) = Total pole length
  • (D_{planting}) = Minimum depth of planting (from Table 1)

Typical Pole Detail Notes:

  • Holes (for earthing, kicking blocks) generally 20 mm diameter.
  • Pole length and planting depth ensure stability against transverse wind load at 600 mm below top.
flowchart TD
    A[Working Load at 600 mm below top] --> B[Pole length above ground]
    B --> C[Minimum Depth of Planting (Table 1)]
    C --> D[Overall Length of Pole]

This ensures structural stability and compliance with IS 785.

5Reinforcement

IS 785: Reinforcement Key Points

1. Types of Reinforcement (Clause 5.3)

  • Mild steel & medium tensile steel bars/wires:
    Conform to IS 432 (Part 1 & 2)
  • High strength deformed bars/wires:
    Conform to IS 1786

2. Placement & Cover (Clauses 7.1 & 7.2)

  • Reinforcement must be accurately placed and fixed during manufacture.
  • Use corrosion-resistant chairs/buttons to maintain cover.
  • Minimum concrete cover:
    [ \text{Cover} \geq \max(\text{aggregate size} + 2 \text{ mm}, 20 \text{ mm}) ]

3. Surface Condition (Clause 5.3.1)

  • Reinforcement surface must be clean and free from:
    • Loose scale or rust
    • Oil, grease, clay
    • Any material affecting bond with concrete

Summary Table: Reinforcement Specifications

ParameterSpecification
Steel TypeMild/medium tensile (IS 432), High strength (IS 1786)
Minimum CoverMax aggregate size + 2 mm, min 20 mm
Surface ConditionClean, free from contaminants
Fixing DevicesCorrosion-resistant (chairs/buttons)

flowchart TD
    A[Reinforcement Bars/Wires] --> B{Type}
    B --> C[Mild/Medium Tensile (IS 432)]
    B --> D[High Strength Deformed (IS 1786)]
    A --> E[Surface Cleanliness]
    E --> F[Free from scale, rust, oil, grease]
    A --> G[Placement]
    G --> H[Accurate positioning]
    G --> I[Corrosion-resistant chairs/buttons]
    G --> J[Cover ≥ max(aggregate+2mm, 20mm)]

This ensures durability, bond strength, and structural integrity of reinforced concrete poles per IS 785.

6Design Requirements

IS 785: Design Requirements - Key Formulas, Tables, and Specifications


1. Sampling and Testing (Clause 9.2.1)

No. of Poles in LotSample SizeDimensional Acceptance NumberTransverse Strength Acceptance Number
Up to 1001012
101 – 2001513
201 – 3002024
301 – 5003035
  • If any pole fails transverse strength test, double the sample size is retested.
  • No failure in retest = lot accepted.

2. Load Factor (Clause 3.2)

[ \text{Load Factor} = \frac{\text{Ultimate Transverse Load}}{\text{Transverse Load at First Crack}} ]

  • Design transverse load at first crack ≥ working load.

3. Formwork (Clause 7.4.1)

  • Forms must maintain shape during concrete placement.
  • Must be tight to prevent leakage of concrete liquid.

4. Rounding Off (General)

  • Follow IS 2:1960 for rounding final values.
  • Retain the same significant figures as specified.

flowchart TD
    A[Lot of Poles] --> B{Sample Size per Table}
    B --> C[Dimensional Test]
    B --> D[Transverse Strength Test]
    D --> E{Pass?}
    E -- Yes --> F[Lot Accepted]
    E -- No --> G[Double Sample Retest]
    G --> H{Pass Retest?}
    H -- Yes --> F
    H -- No --> I[Lot Rejected]

This concise summary covers key design and quality control requirements per IS 785. For detailed design, refer to the full code.

7Manufacture - Placing, Compaction and Curing of Concrete

IS 785: Manufacture - Placing, Compaction and Curing of Concrete

Key Specifications (Clause 7.5)

  • Placing:

    • Use concrete immediately after mixing.
    • Do not use concrete that has started initial set.
    • After placing and compacting, do not disturb concrete during setting.
    • For hot weather concreting, refer to IS 7861 (Part 1).
  • Compaction (Clause 7.5.2):

    • Use mechanical methods: spinning, vibrating, shocking.
    • Hand compaction is prohibited.
    • Ensure full compaction to avoid honeycombing and voids.
  • Formwork (Clause 7.4.1):

    • Forms must maintain shape during placing and compaction.
    • Forms must be tight to prevent loss of concrete liquid.

Typical Compaction Methods

MethodDescriptionApplication
SpinningRotating molds for centrifugal compactionPrecast concrete pipes
VibratingInternal or external vibrators to consolidateMost concrete structures
ShockingImpact loading to settle concreteSpecial precast elements

Curing (General Practice)

  • Maintain moisture for minimum 7 days (28 days for high-strength concrete).
  • Use water curing, wet coverings, or curing compounds.
  • Prevent rapid drying to avoid shrinkage cracks.
flowchart TD
    A[Mix Concrete] --> B[Place in Formwork]
    B --> C[Compact Mechanically]
    C --> D[Do Not Disturb Concrete]
    D --> E[Curing (≥7 days)]

Summary: Use fresh concrete, compact mechanically, ensure formwork integrity, and cure properly for durable, defect-free concrete as per IS 785 Clause 7.5.

8Testing - Transverse Strength Test

IS 785: Transverse Strength Test of Reinforced Concrete Poles

Key Points from IS 785 and IS 2905

  • Test Standard: Transverse strength test per IS 2905.
  • Acceptance Criteria: Ultimate transverse load ≥ Design ultimate transverse load.
  • Design Requirements (Clause 6.4):
    • Poles must resist transverse wind load × load factor.
    • Include snow load if applicable.
    • At working load, stresses must avoid harmful cracking.

Load Factor (Clause 3.2)

[ \text{Load Factor} = \frac{\text{Ultimate Transverse Load}}{\text{Transverse Load at First Crack}} \geq 1 ]

  • Transverse load at first crack ≥ working load.

Sampling (Clause 9.2.2)

  • Number of poles for testing as per Table 2, Column 4 (IS 785).
  • Poles may be selected from those already tested.

Typical Design Formula for Transverse Strength

[ P_u \geq \text{Load Factor} \times P_w ]

Where:

  • (P_u) = Ultimate transverse load capacity (kN)
  • (P_w) = Working transverse load (wind + snow) (kN)

Summary Table (Example)

ParameterValue/Specification
Load Factor≥ 1 (per Clause 3.2)
Ultimate Load (Test)≥ Design Ultimate Load (per Clause 8.1)
Sample SizeAs per Table 2, Col 4 (Clause 9.2.2)
Design Load ConsiderationsWind + Snow (if applicable) × Load Factor

flowchart TD
    A[Design Working Load (Pw)] --> B[Apply Load Factor]
    B --> C[Design Ultimate Load (Pu)]
    C --> D[Test Pole for Ultimate Load]
    D -->|Pu Test ≥ Pu Design| E[Pass]
    D -->|Pu Test < Pu Design| F[Fail]

This ensures poles meet transverse strength requirements as per IS 785 and IS 2905.

9Sampling and Inspection

IS 785 - Sampling and Inspection: Key Points

1. Sampling Scale & Sample Size (Clause 9.1 & Table 9.2.1)

No. of Poles in LotSample SizeDimensional Acceptance NumberTransverse Strength Acceptance Number
Up to 1001012
101 to 2001513
201 to 3002024
301 to 5003035
  • Sample size: Number of poles tested from the lot.
  • Acceptance number: Maximum allowable defective poles for dimensional and transverse strength tests.

2. Inspection Procedure (Clause 9.2.1)

  • If any pole fails the transverse strength test, double the original sample size is tested.
  • If no failure in the second test, the lot is accepted.
  • If failures persist, the lot is rejected.

3. Rounding Off (Clause None)

  • Test results are rounded per IS 2:1960.
  • Retain the same decimal places as specified values.

Summary Diagram:

flowchart TD
    A[Select Lot] --> B[Determine Sample Size]
    B --> C[Test Poles for Dimensional & Strength]
    C --> D{Failures?}
    D -- No --> E[Accept Lot]
    D -- Yes --> F[Double Sample Size Test]
    F --> G{Failures?}
    G -- No --> E
    G -- Yes --> H[Reject Lot]

This ensures quality control with statistically valid sampling and acceptance criteria.

10Marking and Identification

IS 785 - Marking and Identification of Concrete Poles

Key Specifications (Clause 10.1 & 10.2)

Poles must be clearly and indelibly marked either during or after manufacture but before testing, at a visible position after erection, with:

  • Source of manufacture
  • Month and year of manufacture
  • Serial number of the pole
  • Position of centre of gravity (marked as 'C.G')

BIS Certification Marking (Clause 10.2)

  • Poles may carry the BIS Standard Mark as per the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986.
  • Use of the Standard Mark is subject to BIS licensing conditions.

Important Notes

  • Markings should be durable and legible after erection.
  • Follow IS 2:1960 for rounding off numerical values in test results.

flowchart LR
    A[Manufacture] --> B[Marking]
    B --> C[Source of Manufacture]
    B --> D[Month & Year]
    B --> E[Serial Number]
    B --> F[Centre of Gravity (C.G)]
    B --> G[Optional: BIS Standard Mark]
    G --> H[License Conditions]
    F --> I[Visible after erection]

This ensures traceability, quality control, and compliance with BIS standards for concrete poles.

Annex AList of Referenced Indian Standards

IS 785 - List of Referenced Indian Standards

The key referenced IS standards in IS 785 cover materials, testing, design, and construction practices for concrete and reinforcement:

IS No. & YearTitle
IS 269:1989Specification for 33 grade ordinary Portland cement
IS 383:1970Specification for coarse and fine aggregates for concrete
IS 1786:1985High strength deformed steel bars for concrete reinforcement
IS 432 (Parts 1 & 2):1982Mild steel & medium tensile steel bars, hard-drawn steel wire for reinforcement
IS 455:1989Specification for Portland slag cement
IS 456:1978Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete
IS 516:1959Method of test for strength of concrete
IS 875 (Part 3):1987Code of practice for design loads - Wind loads
IS 8112:1989Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement
IS 12269:1987Specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement

Important Notes:

  • These referenced standards provide material specifications, testing methods, and design guidelines essential for compliance with IS 785.
  • Always check for the latest edition of these standards for current requirements.
  • BIS Certification Mark usage is governed by the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 (Clause 10.2.1).

Example: Concrete Strength Test (IS 516:1959)

  • Compressive strength, f_c = P / A
    where P = load at failure (N), A = cross-sectional area (mm²)

flowchart LR
    A[IS 785] --> B[Material Specs]
    A --> C[Testing Methods]
    A --> D[Design Codes]
    B --> IS269["IS 269: Cement"]
    B --> IS383["IS 383: Aggregates"]
    C --> IS516["IS 516: Concrete Strength"]
    D --> IS456["IS 456: Concrete Practice"]
    D --> IS875["IS 875: Wind Loads"]

This concise list and structure help ensure compliance with IS 785 by referencing appropriate Indian Standards.

Annex BCommittee Composition

IS 785: Committee Composition - Key Details

Committee: Cement Matrix Products Sectional Committee, CED 53
Location: Annex B of IS 785 standard (Foreword)


Composition Highlights

RoleRepresentative Organization
ChairmanShri S. A. Reddi, Gammon India Ltd, Mumbai
MembersVarious representatives from:
- Municipal Corporations (Delhi, Mumbai)
- Rural Electrification Corporation
- Construction Technology Pvt Ltd
- Prefab Ltd, Water Supply Board
- Research & Standards Organizations
- Pipe Manufacturers Associations
- National Test House, Structural Research Centres
- Central Public Works Department
- Director General, Bureau of Indian Standards (Ex-officio)

Notes:

  • Each member often has an alternate.
  • The committee includes experts from government, industry, research, and standards bodies.
  • This diverse composition ensures comprehensive technical input for the standard.

No specific formulas or tables are provided for committee composition in IS 785.

Refer to Annex B for full member details.

flowchart TD
    A[Chairman: Shri S. A. Reddi] --> B[Municipal Corporations]
    A --> C[Rural Electrification Corporation]
    A --> D[Construction Technology Pvt Ltd]
    A --> E[Research & Standards Organizations]
    A --> F[Pipe Manufacturers Associations]
    A --> G[National Test House]
    A --> H[Public Works Department]
    A --> I[BIS Director General (Ex-officio)]

For certification and marking details, see Clause 10.2.1.

Popular Questions About IS 785

?What types of cement and aggregates are permitted for reinforced concrete poles under IS 785?

Permitted Cement Types for Reinforced Concrete Poles (IS 785, Clause 5.1):

  • 33 grade Ordinary Portland Cement (IS 269)
  • 43 grade Ordinary Portland Cement (IS 8112)
  • 53 grade Ordinary Portland Cement (IS 12269)
  • Portland Slag Cement (IS 455)
  • Portland Pozzolana Cement (Fly ash based, IS 1489 Part 1)
  • Portland Pozzolana Cement (Calcined clay based, IS 1489 Part 2)
  • Rapid Hardening Portland Cement (IS 8041)

Permitted Aggregates (IS 785, Clause 5.2):

  • Aggregates must conform to IS 383.
  • Manufacturer should submit aggregate samples to the purchaser for approval when specified.

Summary Table

Material TypeIS Code ReferenceNotes
CementIS 269, IS 8112, IS 12269, IS 455, IS 1489 (1 & 2), IS 8041Various grades and types allowed
AggregatesIS 383Must meet grading and quality requirements

This ensures durability and strength suitable for overhead power and telecommunication poles.

?How is the transverse strength of concrete poles tested according to this standard?

According to IS 785, the transverse strength of reinforced concrete poles is tested as follows:

  • Test Standard: Conducted per IS 2905 (the standard for testing poles).
  • Acceptance Criterion: The pole passes if the ultimate transverse load observed ≥ design ultimate transverse load.
  • Sampling: A specified number of poles from the lot (per Table 2, col 4) are tested for transverse strength (Clause 9.2.2).
  • Design Requirements: Poles must withstand transverse loads due to wind (and snow if applicable), factoring in load factors (Clause 6.4).
  • Concrete Quality: Concrete compressive strength tests per IS 456 and IS 516 ensure material adequacy (Clause 7.7).

Summary Table for Transverse Strength Test

ParameterReference ClauseDetails
Test method8.1As per IS 2905
Acceptance criteria8.1Ultimate load ≥ design ultimate load
Sampling size9.2.2Per Table 2, column 4
Design load considerations6.4Wind load × load factor (+ snow load)
Concrete strength verification7.7IS 456 & IS 516 compressive tests

This ensures poles are structurally safe under transverse loads encountered in service.

?What are the requirements for reinforcement placement and cover in pole manufacture?

Reinforcement Placement & Cover Requirements in IS 785 for Concrete Poles:

  • Reinforcement Types:

    • Mild steel and medium tensile bars/wires per IS 432 (Part 1 & 2)
    • High strength deformed bars/wires per IS 1786 (Clause 5.3)
  • Concrete Grade:

    • Minimum concrete grade M25 (Clause 5.5)
  • Cover to Reinforcement:

    • Although IS 785 doesn’t explicitly specify cover thickness, typical practice for poles is:
      • Minimum cover: 25 to 40 mm to protect against corrosion and ensure durability.
      • Cover depends on exposure conditions and pole diameter.
  • Reinforcement Placement:

    • Bars/wires must be placed to maintain structural integrity and facilitate holes for attachments (Clause 7.9).
    • Sufficient holes for cross arms and equipment should not compromise reinforcement layout.

Typical Reinforcement Cover Table (General Practice)

Exposure ConditionMinimum Cover (mm)
Moderate25
Severe40

Loading diagram...

Summary: Use IS 432/1786 steel, M25 concrete, provide 25-40 mm cover, and carefully arrange reinforcement around holes per IS 785.

?What mechanical methods of concrete compaction are allowed and why is hand compaction prohibited?

Mechanical Methods Allowed for Concrete Compaction (IS 785 - Clause 7.5.2):

  • Spinning
  • Vibrating
  • Shocking
  • Other suitable mechanical means

These methods ensure uniform compaction, reducing voids and entrapped air, which improves concrete strength and durability.


Why Hand Compaction is Prohibited:

  • Inadequate compaction: Hand compaction cannot uniformly consolidate concrete, especially in dense or reinforced sections.
  • Risk of honeycombing and voids: Leads to poor strength and durability.
  • Non-uniform density: Mechanical methods provide consistent energy and frequency, ensuring better compaction quality.

Summary Table

MethodDescriptionAdvantage
SpinningRotating molds or formsUniform compaction in molds
VibratingInternal or external vibratorsEffective for all concrete types
ShockingSudden impact or joltingQuick consolidation

Note: Proper compaction is critical to achieve the designed concrete strength and durability as per IS 785.

?How should reinforced concrete poles be marked for identification after manufacture?

According to IS 785, Clause 10.1, reinforced concrete poles must be clearly and indelibly marked either during curing or immediately after manufacture, but before testing. The marking should be at a visible position after erection and must include:

  • Source of manufacture (manufacturer's name or code)
  • Month and year of manufacture
  • Serial number of the pole
  • Position of the centre of gravity, clearly indicated with the letters "C.G"

This ensures easy identification and traceability of poles on site.


Summary of Marking Requirements:

Marking DetailDescription
Source of ManufactureManufacturer's name/code
Month & YearDate of manufacture
Serial NumberUnique ID for each pole
Centre of Gravity (C.G)Marked position on the pole

This marking practice helps in quality control, inventory management, and safe handling during installation.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 785. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required