IS 785:1998 specifies requirements for the design, materials, manufacture, testing, and marking of reinforced concrete poles used in overhead power, traction, and telecommunication lines. It applies to poles made with mechanical compaction methods and covers aspects such as transverse strength, planting depth, reinforcement, and curing. This standard is essential for manufacturers, engineers, and utilities involved in the production and deployment of durable, safe concrete poles for electrical and communication infrastructure.
Overview
IS 785:1998 specifies requirements for the design, materials, manufacture, testing, and marking of reinforced concrete poles used in overhead power, traction, and telecommunication lines. It applies to poles made with mechanical compaction methods and covers aspects such as transverse strength, planting depth, reinforcement, and curing. This standard is essential for manufacturers, engineers, and utilities involved in the production and deployment of durable, safe concrete poles for electrical and communication infrastructure.
Audience
Contents
Structure
IS 785: Scope & Key Specifications
| No. of Poles in Lot | Sample Size | Max Defectives (Dimensional) | Max Defectives (Transverse Strength) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 100 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 101 to 200 | 15 | 1 | 3 |
| 201 to 300 | 20 | 2 | 4 |
| 301 to 500 | 30 | 3 | 5 |
This ensures quality control via statistically valid sampling and testing.
IS 785: Key Definitions & Specifications
Table: Number of Tests and Acceptance Criteria
| No. of Poles in Lot | Sample Size | Max Defective Poles (Dimensional) | Max Defective Poles (Transverse Strength) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 100 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 101 to 200 | 15 | 1 | 3 |
| 201 to 300 | 20 | 2 | 4 |
| 301 to 500 | 30 | 3 | 5 |
flowchart TD
A[Lot of Poles] --> B[Select Sample Size]
B --> C{Test Poles}
C -->|Pass| D[Lot Accepted]
C -->|Fail| E[Double Sample Size]
E --> F{Retest}
F -->|Pass| D
F -->|Fail| G[Lot Rejected]
Materials covered in IS 785 relate mainly to cement, aggregates, and reinforcement steel, referencing several IS standards:
| Material | IS Code & Title |
|---|---|
| Ordinary Portland Cement (33, 43, 53 grade) | IS 269:1989, IS 8112:1989, IS 12269:1987 |
| Portland Pozzolana Cement | IS 1489 (Part 1 & 2):1991 |
| Portland Slag Cement | IS 455:1989 |
| Rapid Hardening Portland Cement | IS 8041:1990 |
| Aggregates (Coarse & Fine) | IS 383:1970 |
| Reinforcement Steel (Mild, Medium tensile, High strength deformed bars) | IS 432 (Part 1 & 2):1982, IS 1786:1985 |
| Material | Characteristic Strength | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| OPC 43 Grade | 43 MPa (28-day compressive strength) | IS 8112 |
| Coarse Aggregate | Max size 20mm (typical) | IS 383 |
| High Strength Deformed Bars | Yield strength ≥ 500 MPa | IS 1786 |
For detailed mix design or reinforcement detailing, refer to IS 456:1978 (Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code).
flowchart LR
Cement --> Concrete
Aggregates --> Concrete
Water --> Concrete
Admixtures --> Concrete
Steel --> Reinforced_Concrete
Concrete --> Structure
Reinforced_Concrete --> Structure
Summary: IS 785 refers to established IS standards for materials — cement, aggregates, steel — ensuring quality and compliance for concrete products.
Overall Length of Poles (IS 785 Key Points):
| Length of Pole (m) | Minimum Depth of Planting (m) |
|---|---|
| 6.0 to 7.0 | 1.20 |
| 7.5 to 9.0 | 1.50 |
Clause 3.5 - Working Load:
The maximum transverse load is assumed acting 600 mm below the top with the pole planted to the required depth.
Clause 9.1.3 & 9.2.1 - Sampling & Testing:
Poles are selected per Table 2 (lot size based), tested for:
Poles failing any are defective; acceptance based on sample defect limits.
[ L_{overall} = L_{above\ ground} + D_{planting} ]
Where:
flowchart TD
A[Working Load at 600 mm below top] --> B[Pole length above ground]
B --> C[Minimum Depth of Planting (Table 1)]
C --> D[Overall Length of Pole]
This ensures structural stability and compliance with IS 785.
IS 785: Reinforcement Key Points
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Steel Type | Mild/medium tensile (IS 432), High strength (IS 1786) |
| Minimum Cover | Max aggregate size + 2 mm, min 20 mm |
| Surface Condition | Clean, free from contaminants |
| Fixing Devices | Corrosion-resistant (chairs/buttons) |
flowchart TD
A[Reinforcement Bars/Wires] --> B{Type}
B --> C[Mild/Medium Tensile (IS 432)]
B --> D[High Strength Deformed (IS 1786)]
A --> E[Surface Cleanliness]
E --> F[Free from scale, rust, oil, grease]
A --> G[Placement]
G --> H[Accurate positioning]
G --> I[Corrosion-resistant chairs/buttons]
G --> J[Cover ≥ max(aggregate+2mm, 20mm)]
This ensures durability, bond strength, and structural integrity of reinforced concrete poles per IS 785.
IS 785: Design Requirements - Key Formulas, Tables, and Specifications
| No. of Poles in Lot | Sample Size | Dimensional Acceptance Number | Transverse Strength Acceptance Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 100 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 101 – 200 | 15 | 1 | 3 |
| 201 – 300 | 20 | 2 | 4 |
| 301 – 500 | 30 | 3 | 5 |
[ \text{Load Factor} = \frac{\text{Ultimate Transverse Load}}{\text{Transverse Load at First Crack}} ]
flowchart TD
A[Lot of Poles] --> B{Sample Size per Table}
B --> C[Dimensional Test]
B --> D[Transverse Strength Test]
D --> E{Pass?}
E -- Yes --> F[Lot Accepted]
E -- No --> G[Double Sample Retest]
G --> H{Pass Retest?}
H -- Yes --> F
H -- No --> I[Lot Rejected]
This concise summary covers key design and quality control requirements per IS 785. For detailed design, refer to the full code.
IS 785: Manufacture - Placing, Compaction and Curing of Concrete
Placing:
Compaction (Clause 7.5.2):
Formwork (Clause 7.4.1):
| Method | Description | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Spinning | Rotating molds for centrifugal compaction | Precast concrete pipes |
| Vibrating | Internal or external vibrators to consolidate | Most concrete structures |
| Shocking | Impact loading to settle concrete | Special precast elements |
flowchart TD
A[Mix Concrete] --> B[Place in Formwork]
B --> C[Compact Mechanically]
C --> D[Do Not Disturb Concrete]
D --> E[Curing (≥7 days)]
Summary: Use fresh concrete, compact mechanically, ensure formwork integrity, and cure properly for durable, defect-free concrete as per IS 785 Clause 7.5.
IS 785: Transverse Strength Test of Reinforced Concrete Poles
[ \text{Load Factor} = \frac{\text{Ultimate Transverse Load}}{\text{Transverse Load at First Crack}} \geq 1 ]
[ P_u \geq \text{Load Factor} \times P_w ]
Where:
| Parameter | Value/Specification |
|---|---|
| Load Factor | ≥ 1 (per Clause 3.2) |
| Ultimate Load (Test) | ≥ Design Ultimate Load (per Clause 8.1) |
| Sample Size | As per Table 2, Col 4 (Clause 9.2.2) |
| Design Load Considerations | Wind + Snow (if applicable) × Load Factor |
flowchart TD
A[Design Working Load (Pw)] --> B[Apply Load Factor]
B --> C[Design Ultimate Load (Pu)]
C --> D[Test Pole for Ultimate Load]
D -->|Pu Test ≥ Pu Design| E[Pass]
D -->|Pu Test < Pu Design| F[Fail]
This ensures poles meet transverse strength requirements as per IS 785 and IS 2905.
IS 785 - Sampling and Inspection: Key Points
| No. of Poles in Lot | Sample Size | Dimensional Acceptance Number | Transverse Strength Acceptance Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up to 100 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 101 to 200 | 15 | 1 | 3 |
| 201 to 300 | 20 | 2 | 4 |
| 301 to 500 | 30 | 3 | 5 |
flowchart TD
A[Select Lot] --> B[Determine Sample Size]
B --> C[Test Poles for Dimensional & Strength]
C --> D{Failures?}
D -- No --> E[Accept Lot]
D -- Yes --> F[Double Sample Size Test]
F --> G{Failures?}
G -- No --> E
G -- Yes --> H[Reject Lot]
This ensures quality control with statistically valid sampling and acceptance criteria.
IS 785 - Marking and Identification of Concrete Poles
Poles must be clearly and indelibly marked either during or after manufacture but before testing, at a visible position after erection, with:
flowchart LR
A[Manufacture] --> B[Marking]
B --> C[Source of Manufacture]
B --> D[Month & Year]
B --> E[Serial Number]
B --> F[Centre of Gravity (C.G)]
B --> G[Optional: BIS Standard Mark]
G --> H[License Conditions]
F --> I[Visible after erection]
This ensures traceability, quality control, and compliance with BIS standards for concrete poles.
IS 785 - List of Referenced Indian Standards
The key referenced IS standards in IS 785 cover materials, testing, design, and construction practices for concrete and reinforcement:
| IS No. & Year | Title |
|---|---|
| IS 269:1989 | Specification for 33 grade ordinary Portland cement |
| IS 383:1970 | Specification for coarse and fine aggregates for concrete |
| IS 1786:1985 | High strength deformed steel bars for concrete reinforcement |
| IS 432 (Parts 1 & 2):1982 | Mild steel & medium tensile steel bars, hard-drawn steel wire for reinforcement |
| IS 455:1989 | Specification for Portland slag cement |
| IS 456:1978 | Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete |
| IS 516:1959 | Method of test for strength of concrete |
| IS 875 (Part 3):1987 | Code of practice for design loads - Wind loads |
| IS 8112:1989 | Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement |
| IS 12269:1987 | Specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement |
flowchart LR
A[IS 785] --> B[Material Specs]
A --> C[Testing Methods]
A --> D[Design Codes]
B --> IS269["IS 269: Cement"]
B --> IS383["IS 383: Aggregates"]
C --> IS516["IS 516: Concrete Strength"]
D --> IS456["IS 456: Concrete Practice"]
D --> IS875["IS 875: Wind Loads"]
This concise list and structure help ensure compliance with IS 785 by referencing appropriate Indian Standards.
Committee: Cement Matrix Products Sectional Committee, CED 53
Location: Annex B of IS 785 standard (Foreword)
| Role | Representative Organization |
|---|---|
| Chairman | Shri S. A. Reddi, Gammon India Ltd, Mumbai |
| Members | Various representatives from: |
| - Municipal Corporations (Delhi, Mumbai) | |
| - Rural Electrification Corporation | |
| - Construction Technology Pvt Ltd | |
| - Prefab Ltd, Water Supply Board | |
| - Research & Standards Organizations | |
| - Pipe Manufacturers Associations | |
| - National Test House, Structural Research Centres | |
| - Central Public Works Department | |
| - Director General, Bureau of Indian Standards (Ex-officio) |
Refer to Annex B for full member details.
flowchart TD
A[Chairman: Shri S. A. Reddi] --> B[Municipal Corporations]
A --> C[Rural Electrification Corporation]
A --> D[Construction Technology Pvt Ltd]
A --> E[Research & Standards Organizations]
A --> F[Pipe Manufacturers Associations]
A --> G[National Test House]
A --> H[Public Works Department]
A --> I[BIS Director General (Ex-officio)]
For certification and marking details, see Clause 10.2.1.
Frequently Asked
Permitted Cement Types for Reinforced Concrete Poles (IS 785, Clause 5.1):
Permitted Aggregates (IS 785, Clause 5.2):
| Material Type | IS Code Reference | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cement | IS 269, IS 8112, IS 12269, IS 455, IS 1489 (1 & 2), IS 8041 | Various grades and types allowed |
| Aggregates | IS 383 | Must meet grading and quality requirements |
This ensures durability and strength suitable for overhead power and telecommunication poles.
According to IS 785, the transverse strength of reinforced concrete poles is tested as follows:
| Parameter | Reference Clause | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Test method | 8.1 | As per IS 2905 |
| Acceptance criteria | 8.1 | Ultimate load ≥ design ultimate load |
| Sampling size | 9.2.2 | Per Table 2, column 4 |
| Design load considerations | 6.4 | Wind load × load factor (+ snow load) |
| Concrete strength verification | 7.7 | IS 456 & IS 516 compressive tests |
This ensures poles are structurally safe under transverse loads encountered in service.
Reinforcement Placement & Cover Requirements in IS 785 for Concrete Poles:
Reinforcement Types:
Concrete Grade:
Cover to Reinforcement:
Reinforcement Placement:
| Exposure Condition | Minimum Cover (mm) |
|---|---|
| Moderate | 25 |
| Severe | 40 |
Loading diagram...
Summary: Use IS 432/1786 steel, M25 concrete, provide 25-40 mm cover, and carefully arrange reinforcement around holes per IS 785.
Mechanical Methods Allowed for Concrete Compaction (IS 785 - Clause 7.5.2):
These methods ensure uniform compaction, reducing voids and entrapped air, which improves concrete strength and durability.
Why Hand Compaction is Prohibited:
| Method | Description | Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Spinning | Rotating molds or forms | Uniform compaction in molds |
| Vibrating | Internal or external vibrators | Effective for all concrete types |
| Shocking | Sudden impact or jolting | Quick consolidation |
Note: Proper compaction is critical to achieve the designed concrete strength and durability as per IS 785.
According to IS 785, Clause 10.1, reinforced concrete poles must be clearly and indelibly marked either during curing or immediately after manufacture, but before testing. The marking should be at a visible position after erection and must include:
This ensures easy identification and traceability of poles on site.
| Marking Detail | Description |
|---|---|
| Source of Manufacture | Manufacturer's name/code |
| Month & Year | Date of manufacture |
| Serial Number | Unique ID for each pole |
| Centre of Gravity (C.G) | Marked position on the pole |
This marking practice helps in quality control, inventory management, and safe handling during installation.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 785. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required