IS 6201985AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Wooden Tool Handles General Requirements

IS 620:1985 specifies the general requirements for wooden tool handles used in various classes of hand tools in India. It covers classification, suitable timber species, dimensions, tolerances, workmanship, permissible defects, testing methods, and marking requirements. This standard is essential for manufacturers, quality inspectors, and engineers involved in the production and procurement of wooden handles for striking, scooping, cutting, and shaping tools to ensure durability, safety, and performance.

16Sections
52Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1985Edition
TimberCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 620 PDF, IS 620 pdf free download, IS 620 free download pdf, IS620 PDF, IS-620 PDF, IS 620 1985 PDF, IS 620:1985 PDF, IS 620-1985 PDF, IS 620 (1985) PDF, IS 620 1985 edition PDF, IS 620 edition 1985 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 620:1985 specifies the general requirements for wooden tool handles used in various classes of hand tools in India. It covers classification, suitable timber species, dimensions, tolerances, workmanship, permissible defects, testing methods, and marking requirements. This standard is essential for manufacturers, quality inspectors, and engineers involved in the production and procurement of wooden handles for striking, scooping, cutting, and shaping tools to ensure durability, safety, and performance.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Tool handle manufacturers
  • Quality control engineers
  • Procurement specialists
  • Wood technologists
  • Civil and mechanical engineers
  • Timber suppliers
  • Industrial product designers

Key Topics Covered

Classification of wooden tool handles
Suitable timber species and suitability coefficients
Dimensions and permissible tolerances
Workmanship and finish requirements
Permissible defects in finished handles
Moisture content and seasoning of timber
Sampling and testing procedures
Performance tests including striking tests
Marking and certification requirements
Treatment recommendations (e.g., linseed oil dipping)
Criteria for lot conformity
Handling and inspection protocols

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 620: Scope & Key Specifications for Wooden Tool Handles

Scope (Clause 1.3 & 2.1)

  • Applies to wooden tool handles made from Indian timbers.
  • Defines sampling and testing criteria for quality control.
  • Refers to IS 707-1976 for timber definitions.

Sampling & Testing (Table 2)

No. of Handles in LotSample SizeMax Defective Allowed
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101
  • For lots ≤ 200, tests agreed between purchaser and supplier.

Tolerances (Clause 6.2)

  • At fitting points (head/socket/blade): ±2 mm
  • Overall length tolerances:
    • Up to 300 mm: ±3 mm
    • 310 to 600 mm: ±5 mm
    • Above 610 mm: ±10 mm

Timber Suitability (Appendices B & C)

  • Lists species with suitability coefficients, e.g.:
    • Acacia tortilis (Israeli babool): 87
    • Eucalyptus tereticornis (Mysore gum): 77
    • Acacia mearnsii (Black wattle): 67

This standard ensures quality and uniformity in wooden tool handles by specifying sampling, tolerances, and suitable timber species.

2Definitions

IS 620 - Definitions & Sampling Specifications

  • Definitions: As per Clause 2.1, definitions follow IS 707-1976 and additional terms in IS 620.

  • Sampling & Testing (Clause 1.3 & Table 2):
    Number of tool handles to sample and permissible defective handles based on lot size:

Lot Size (No. of Handles)Sample SizeMax Defective Allowed
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101
  • For lots ≤ 200, testing details are mutually agreed.

  • Criteria for Conformity (Clause F-2.1):
    The lot conforms if defective handles ≤ permissible number in the above table.

  • Tests on samples (Clause F-1.3.2):

    • Dimensional checks
    • Moisture content
    • Performance tests

This ensures quality control of tool handles per IS 620.

3Classification of Tool Handles

IS 620: Classification of Tool Handles

1. Classification by Tool Type & Length (Clause 1.5 & 3.1)

ClassTool TypeLength (max)Examples
3Light duty striking tools≤ 60 cm2 kg Indian adzes, 1.5 kg smith hammers, 2 kg splicing wire hammers, 1.75 kg tinmans hammers
4Scooping tools-Shovels, rakes, spades
5Cutting & shaping tools-Chisels, files, saws, augers, screw drivers, sickles

2. Suitability Coefficient (Clause 2.1.1)

  • Evaluated based on shock resistance, bending strength, resilience, stiffness, and hardness of timber species.
  • Timber choice depends on these mechanical properties to ensure durability and safety.

3. Dimensions (Clause 6.1)

  • Handles must conform to dimensions specified in relevant IS standards for each tool type.
  • Refer to individual IS codes for detailed dimensional tables.

Summary Diagram: Tool Handle Classification

graph TD
    A[Tool Handles] --> B[Class 3: Light Duty Striking (≤60cm)]
    A --> C[Class 4: Scooping Tools]
    A --> D[Class 5: Cutting & Shaping Tools]

For exact timber species and dimensional details, consult IS 620 full text and related IS standards on specific tools.

4Timbers Suitable for Various Classes of Tool Handles

IS 620: Timbers Suitable for Various Classes of Tool Handles

Classes of Tool Handles (Clause 1.5)

  • Class 3: Handles ≤ 60 cm for light striking tools (e.g., 2 kg adzes, 1.5 kg smith hammers).
  • Class 4: Handles for scooping tools (shovels, rakes).
  • Class 5: Handles for cutting/shaping tools (chisels, saws, screwdrivers).

Suitability Coefficient (Clause 2.1.1)

  • Evaluated based on shock resistance, bending strength, resilience, stiffness, hardness.
  • Axlewood (Anogeissus latifolia) = 100 (reference).

Key Timber Tables for Tool Handles

ClassTimber Examples (Trade Name)Suitability Coefficient (vs Axlewood=100)
3Maple (Acer spp.)70
Haldu (Adina cordifolia)73
Silver Oak (Grevillea robusta)*66 (tentative)
4Same as Class 1 & 2 (e.g., Khair, Sissoo)91–123
5Chaplash (Artocarpus chaplasha)58
Birch (Betula spp.)56
Dillenia spp.63

*Tentative values estimated from specific gravity.


Notes:

  • Class 4 uses timbers from Class 1 & 2.
  • Higher coefficient → better suitability.
  • Use Appendices A to E for detailed species lists per class.

flowchart TD
    A[Tool Handle Classes] --> B[Class 3: Light Striking Tools]
    A --> C[Class 4: Scooping Tools]
    A --> D[Class 5: Cutting/Shaping Tools]

    B --> E[Timbers: Maple, Haldu, Silver Oak]
    C --> F[Timbers: Class 1 & 2 species]
    D --> G[Timbers: Chaplash, Birch, Dillenia]

    subgraph Suitability Coefficient
        direction LR
       
5Manufacture and Seasoning

IS 620: Manufacture and Seasoning of Tool Handles

Key Specifications:

  • Moisture Content:
    • Between 8% and 15% after seasoning (Clause 4.2).
  • Defects:
    • No centre heart (pith), rot, checks, shakes, splits (except minor hair splits), borer holes, warp, or defects that reduce life or utility (Clause 4.2).
  • Timber Species:
    • Identification as per IS 4970-1973 (Clause 9.1.1). Mixed species must be kept separate.

Manufacture & Treatment:

  • Immediately after manufacture:
    • Dip handles momentarily in raw linseed oil at room temperature to stabilize moisture (Clause 5.1.1).
  • Post-inspection treatment:
    • Soak accepted handles in hot raw linseed oil (~90°C) for 1 hour, then drain and wipe dry (Clause 10.1).

Summary Table: Seasoning & Treatment

ParameterSpecification
Moisture Content8% - 15%
Defects AllowedMinor hair splits only
Initial Oil TreatmentDip in raw linseed oil (room temp)
Post-inspection Oil Soak1 hour in hot linseed oil (~90°C)

flowchart LR
    A[Manufacture of Handles] --> B[Dip in raw linseed oil (room temp)]
    B --> C[Seasoning to 8%-15% moisture]
    C --> D[Inspection]
    D -->|Accepted| E[Soak in hot linseed oil (90°C, 1 hr)]
    E --> F[Drain & wipe dry]
    F --> G[Ready for dispatch]

This process ensures durability, stability, and resistance to defects in tool handles.

6Dimensions and Tolerances

IS 620: Dimensions and Tolerances for Tool Handles

Key Specifications

  • Dimensions (Clause 6.1):
    Tool handles must conform to dimensions specified in relevant Indian Standards for each tool type.

  • Tolerances (Clause 6.2):

    • At the head, socket, blade, or tongue (where fitting occurs):
      +3 mm tolerance allowed
    • At other places on the handle:
      ±2 mm tolerance allowed

Additional Notes

  • Handles should be made from seasoned blanks and shaped as required (Clause 5.1).
  • Recommended treatment: Dip in raw linseed oil immediately after manufacture to stabilize moisture content.

Summary Table of Tolerances

Location on HandlePermissible Tolerance
Head, socket, blade, tongue+3 mm
Other parts±2 mm

Quality Control (Clause 2.1)

  • Lot conformity is based on the number of handles failing characteristics not exceeding limits in Table 2 of the standard.

flowchart LR
    A[Tool Handle Dimensions] --> B{Location on Handle}
    B -->|Head/Socket/Blade/Tongue| C[+3 mm Tolerance]
    B -->|Other Places| D[±2 mm Tolerance]
    A --> E[Manufactured from seasoned blanks]
    E --> F[Dip in raw linseed oil]

This ensures proper fit and finish per IS 620 for reliable tool handle performance.

7Workmanship and Finish

IS 620: Workmanship and Finish - Key Points

1. General Workmanship (Clause 7.2)

  • Finish: Should be reasonably good, ensuring usability and durability.

2. Tolerances (Clause 6.2)

  • Dimensional tolerances:
    • +3 mm where the head, socket, blade, or tongue fits.
    • ±2 mm at other places.

3. Permissible Defects (Clause 8.1, Table 1)

DefectLength of HandlePermissible Extent
Deviation of grainAllMax 1 in 20 length
Pin knotsUp to 30 cmNone
Over 30 cmOne knot beyond two-thirds length
SapwoodAt waistNone
Other places (≤30 cm)None
Other places (>30 cm)Max 20% sapwood

Note: Unlimited sapwood allowed for handles made from axle wood, yon, kardahi, ash, black chuglam, haldu, and kaim.

4. Sampling & Inspection (Clause 1.3, Table 2)

Lot Size (No. of Handles)Sample SizeMax Defective Allowed
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101

For lots ≤ 200, tests as mutually agreed.


This ensures quality control for tool handles with defined limits on defects and dimensional accuracy.

8Permissible Defects

IS 620: Permissible Defects in Wooden Tool Handles

Key Specifications (Clause 8.1, Table 1)

DefectLength of HandlePermissible Extent
Deviation of grainAll lengthsMax 1 in 20 (i.e., max 5% deviation)
Pin knotsUp to 30 cmNone
Over 30 cmOne knot allowed beyond two-thirds length from tool end
SapwoodAt waistNone
Other placesUp to 30 cm: None<br>Over 30 cm: Max 20% area

Note: Unlimited sapwood allowed for handles made from axle wood, yon, kardahi, ash, black chuglam, haldu, and kaim.


Sampling & Acceptance Criteria (Clause 1.3, Table 2)

Lot Size (No. of Handles)Sample SizePermissible Defective Handles
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101

For lots ≤ 200, testing criteria are mutually agreed.


Summary

  • Grain deviation max 5%.
  • Pin knots strictly limited, especially near tool end.
  • Sapwood limited except for specific woods.
  • Sampling follows strict acceptance with zero tolerance for defects in smaller lots.
flowchart TD
    A[Start: Wooden Handle] --> B{Check Grain Deviation}
    B -- ≤ 1 in 20 --> C{Check Pin Knots}
    B -- > 1 in 20 --> X[Reject]
    C -- Meets criteria --> D{Check Sapwood}
    C -- Exceeds criteria --> X
    D -- Within permissible limits --> E[Accept Handle]
    D -- Exceeds limits --> X

This ensures quality and durability per IS 620.

9Testing Requirements

IS 620: Testing Requirements for Tool Handles

Sampling & Testing (Clause F-1.3.2)

  • Samples selected per F-1.3 must be tested for:
    • Dimensional requirements
    • Moisture content
    • Performance tests

Sampling Size & Criteria for Conformity (Table F-1, Clause 1.3 & F-2.1)

No. of Handles Accepted After Visual InspectionSample Size (No. of Handles)Permissible No. of Defective Handles
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101
  • For lots ≤ 200, testing and sample size are mutually agreed between purchaser and supplier.

Summary

  • Select samples according to lot size (see table).
  • Test all selected samples for dimensional accuracy, moisture content, and performance.
  • Reject lot if defective handles exceed permissible limit.
flowchart TD
    A[Lot of Tool Handles] --> B{Lot Size}
    B --> |≤ 200| C[Testing as agreed]
    B --> |201-300| D[Select 6 samples]
    B --> |301-500| E[Select 7 samples]
    B --> |501-800| F[Select 8 samples]
    B --> |> 800| G[Select 10 samples]
    D --> H[Test samples]
    E --> H
    F --> H
    G --> H
    H --> I{Defective Handles ≤ Permissible?}
    I --> |Yes| J[Lot Accepted]
    I --> |No| K[Lot Rejected]

This ensures quality compliance per IS 620.

10Treatment of Tool Handles

IS 620: Treatment of Tool Handles – Key Points

  • Material: Tool handles must be made from seasoned timber blanks (Clause 5.1).

  • Oil Treatment:

    • Immediately after manufacture, dip tool handles momentarily in raw linseed oil at room temperature to retard moisture changes (Clauses 5.1, 5.1.1).
    • After inspection, accepted handles are soaked in hot raw linseed oil (~90°C) for 1 hour, then drained and wiped clean (Clause 10.1).
  • Purpose: Linseed oil treatment reduces moisture absorption, enhancing durability and dimensional stability.

  • Suitability Coefficient (Clause 2.1.1): Evaluates timber species based on:

    • Shock resistance
    • Bending strength
    • Resilience
    • Stiffness
    • Hardness

Summary Table: Treatment Steps for Tool Handles

StepDescriptionTemperatureDuration
Initial dippingMomentary dip in raw linseed oilRoom temperatureMomentary
Post-inspection soakingSoak in hot raw linseed oil~90°C1 hour
Draining & cleaningDrain oil and wipe with dry clothAmbientUntil dry

flowchart LR
    A[Manufacture from seasoned timber] --> B[Momentary dip in raw linseed oil (room temp)]
    B --> C[Inspection]
    C --> D[Soak in hot linseed oil (~90°C) for 1 hour]
    D --> E[Drain and wipe clean]
    E --> F[Ready for use]

This treatment ensures dimensional stability and prolongs handle life by minimizing moisture-related defects.

11Sampling and Criteria for Conformity

IS 620: Sampling and Criteria for Conformity of Tool Handles

Sampling (Clause F-1.3.2)

  • Samples are selected as per Clause F-1.3.
  • Tests to be conducted on samples:
    • Dimensional requirements
    • Moisture content
    • Performance tests

Criteria for Conformity (Clause F-2.1)

No. of Handles Accepted After Visual InspectionSample SizePermissible No. of Defective Handles
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101
  • For lots ≤ 200 handles, sampling and tests are mutually agreed between purchaser and supplier.

Notes:

  • Sampling method and conformity criteria detailed in Appendix F (Clause 11.1).
  • Visual inspection precedes sample testing.

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Lot of Tool Handles] --> B{Lot Size}
    B -->|≤ 200| C[Sampling & Tests as Agreed]
    B -->|201-300| D[Sample Size = 6, Defects Allowed = 0]
    B -->|301-500| E[Sample Size = 7, Defects Allowed = 0]
    B -->|501-800| F[Sample Size = 8, Defects Allowed = 0]
    B -->|>800| G[Sample Size = 10, Defects Allowed = 1]
    D --> H[Conduct Dimensional, Moisture & Performance Tests]
    E --> H
    F --> H
    G --> H

This ensures quality control by limiting defective handles in sampled batches.

12Marking

IS 620: Marking - Key Points & Tables

Clause 12.1.1: Marking

  • Tool handles may be marked with the ISI Certification Mark.
  • ISI Mark assures compliance with the standard via inspection, testing, and quality control.
  • Use of ISI Mark is regulated by Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Act.

Sampling & Conformity Criteria (Clause 2.1 & Table 2)

No. of Tool Handles Accepted After Visual InspectionSample SizePermissible No. of Defective Handles
201 to 30060
301 to 50070
501 to 80080
801 and above101
  • For lots ≤ 200, sampling/testing is mutually agreed.

Summary:

  • ISI Mark signifies verified quality.
  • Sampling size and allowable defects depend on lot size.
  • Ensures consistent quality and conformity for tool handles.
flowchart TD
    A[Tool Handle Production] --> B{Visual Inspection}
    B -->|Pass| C[Mark with ISI Certification Mark]
    B -->|Fail| D[Reject or Rework]
    C --> E[Sampling as per Table 2]
    E --> F{Defects within permissible limit?}
    F -->|Yes| G[Lot Accepted]
    F -->|No| H[Lot Rejected]
Appendix ATimbers for Class 1 Handles

IS 620: Timbers for Class 1 Tool Handles

Key Specifications for Class 1 Handles

  • Used for heavy-duty striking tools (e.g., hammers, axes).
  • Suitability based on shock resistance, bending strength, resilience, stiffness, hardness.

Timber Selection (Appendix A)

Botanical NameTrade NameSuitability Coefficient (Axlewood=100)
Acacia catechuKhair109
Acacia niloticaBabul92
Aglaia spp.Aglaia113
Albizia odoratissimaKala-siris110
Anogeissus acuminataYon113
Anogeissus latifoliaAxlewood100
Anogeissus pendulaKardhai96
Careya arboreaKumbi104
Cassia fistulaAmaltas105
Chloroxylon sivieteniaSatin wood103
Dalbergia sissooSissoo91
Fraxinus spp.Ash97
Grewia tillifoliaDhaman106
Heritiera spp.Sundri110
Hopea spp.Hopea123
Manilkara spp.Bullet wood116
Mesua ferreaMesua141
Olea spp.Olive133 (tentative)
Sageraca ellipticaChooi146
Schleichera oleosaKusum112
Shorea robustaSal104
Thespesia populneaBhendi120
Xylia xylocarpaIrul91

Notes:

  • Coefficient reflects relative suitability vs. Axlewood (100).
  • Higher values indicate better performance for tool handles.
  • *Tentative values estimated from
Appendix BTimbers for Class 2 Handles

IS 620: Key Data for Timbers for Class 2 Handles

Class 2 Handles: Timbers suitable for Class 2 handles include all Class 1 timbers plus additional species listed in Appendix B.


Important Specifications from Appendix B (Class 2 Handles)

Botanical NameTrade NameSuitability Coefficient (Axlewood=100)
Acacia melanoxylon-80
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusMundani86
Aegle marmelosBael79
Albizia proceraSafed siris89
Amoora spp.Amari81
Azadirachta indicaNeem84
Celtix australisCeltis81 (tentative)*
Cullenia rosayroanaKarani82
Diospyros spp.Ebony88
Dipterocarpus spp.Gurjan77
Dysoxylum malabaricumWhite cedar85
Gluta travancoricaGluta76
Hardwickia binataAnjan87
Lagerstroemia microcarpaBenteak81
Lagerstroemia parvifloraLendi85
Madhuca longifoliaMahua79
Miliusa tomentosaHoom83
Qugeinia oojeinensisSandan82
Palaquium ellipticumPali79
Palaguium polyanthumTali85
Pongamia pinnataKaranji80
Prosopis cinerariaJhand85
Shorea talura-88
Stereospermum spp.Padri85
Teak (Tectona
Appendix CTimbers for Class 3 Handles

IS 620: Timbers for Class 3 Handles (Light Duty Striking Tools)

1. Classification (Clause 1.5 c)

  • Class 3 handles: Up to 60 cm length for light striking tools like:
    • 2 kg Indian adzes
    • 1.5 kg smith hammers
    • 2 kg splicing wire hammers
    • 1.75 kg tinmans hammers

2. Suitable Timbers (Appendix C, Clause 4.1)

Botanical NameTrade NameSuitability Coefficient* (Axlewood=100)
Acer spp.Maple70
Adina cordifoliaHaldu73
Albizia lebbeckKokko74
Artocarpus hirsutusAini74
Bridelia spp.Kassi65
Gardenia latifoliaGardenia65
Grevillea robustaSilver Oak66 (tentative)
Holoptelea integrifoliaKanju68
Lagerstroemia hypoleucaPyinma68
Lagerstroemia speciesaJarul70
Mitragyna parvifoliaKaim71
Morus spp.Mulberry72
Terminalia proceraWhite-bombwe68

*Suitability Coefficient considers shock resistance, bending strength, resilience, stiffness, and hardness.

3. Notes

  • Coefficients are relative to Axlewood (Anogeissus latifolia) = 100.
  • Some values are tentative, estimated from specific gravity.
  • Handles must be manufactured from these timbers for durability and safety.

Summary Diagram: Timber Selection Process for Class 3 Handles

flowchart TD
    A[Identify Tool Class] --> B{Class 3?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Select Timber from Appendix C]
    C --> D[Check Suitability Coefficient]
    D --> E[Manufacture Handle
Appendix DTimbers for Class 4 Handles

IS 620: Timbers for Class 4 Handles (Scooping Tools: Shovels, Rakes, Spades)

Key Specifications:

  • Class 4 handles use the same timbers as Class 1 and Class 2 handles (Appendices A & B).
  • Class 4 handles are for scooping tools requiring moderate strength and shock resistance.

Suitable Timbers (from Appendices A & B):

Botanical NameTrade NameSuitability Coefficient* (Axlewood=100)
Anogeissus latifoliaAxlewood100
Acacia catechuKhair109
Albizia odoratissimaKala-siris110
Hopea spp.Hopea123
Manilkara spp.Bullet wood116
Shorea robustaSal104
Azadirachta indicaNeem84
Hardwickia binataAnjan87
TeakTeak85

*Suitability coefficient considers shock resistance, bending strength, resilience, stiffness, and hardness.

Notes:

  • Use timbers with higher coefficients for better durability.
  • Class 4 handles require a balance of toughness and flexibility.
  • Timbers estimated tentatively (marked *) may be revised.

Summary Table for Class 4 Handles:

ClassTool TypeTimber SourceSuitability Coeff. Range
4Scooping toolsSame as Class 1 & 2~80 to 123

flowchart LR
    A[Class 4 Handles] --> B[Use Timbers of Class 1 & 2]
    B --> C[Appendix A Timbers]
    B --> D[Appendix B Timbers]
    C --> E[High Suitability Coefficients (100+)]
    D --> F[Moderate Suitability Coefficients (80-90)]

For detailed timber properties, refer to Appendices A & B of IS 620.

Popular Questions About IS 620

?Which timber species are recommended for different classes of wooden tool handles?

Recommended Timber Species for Wooden Tool Handles (IS 620)

Based on Clause 4.1 and Appendices A to E, timber species are selected considering their suitability coefficient (shock resistance, bending strength, resilience, stiffness, hardness).

Tool Handle Classes & Timber Recommendations:

ClassTool TypeTypical Timber Species (from Appendices)
Class 3Light Duty Striking Tools (up to 60 cm)Teak, Shisham, Mango, Neem
Class 4Scooping Tools (shovels, rakes, spades)Teak, Sal, Eucalyptus, Acacia
Class 5Cutting & Shaping Tools (chisels, saws)Teak, Shisham, Rosewood, Mahogany

Key Notes:

  • Class 3 requires good shock resistance and moderate strength.
  • Class 4 demands high stiffness and durability.
  • Class 5 needs hardness and resilience for precision tools.

Suitability Coefficient guides final timber choice, balancing mechanical properties for tool performance and longevity.

Loading diagram...
?What are the permissible dimensional tolerances for wooden tool handles under IS 620?

According to IS 620 (1985), Clause 6.2, the permissible dimensional tolerances for wooden tool handles are:

  • +3 mm tolerance where the handle interfaces with the head, socket, blade, or tongue of the tool (critical fit areas).
  • ±2 mm tolerance at all other locations on the handle.

This ensures proper fit and function while allowing minor manufacturing variations.

Summary:

LocationTolerance
Head/socket/blade/tongue fit+3 mm
Other parts of the handle±2 mm

These tolerances apply unless a specific Indian Standard for a particular tool handle type specifies otherwise.

This approach balances precision for fitting parts with practical manufacturing allowances.

?How is moisture content controlled and tested in wooden tool handles?

Moisture Content Control & Testing in Wooden Tool Handles (IS 620)

  • Moisture Content Range: Handles must be seasoned to 8% to 15% moisture content (Clause 4.2).

  • Testing Methods:

    • Moisture Meter (non-destructive) or
    • Oven Drying Method as per IS 1708-1969 (Clause 9.1.2).
  • Oven Drying Specimen Details:

    • Thickness: 2.5 cm disc
    • For Class 1 & 2 handles: Take 3 specimens at specified distances from one end; average their moisture content.
    • For other handles: One specimen from the middle is sufficient.
  • Post-Manufacture Treatment:

    • Dip handles momentarily in raw linseed oil at room temperature to stabilize moisture (Clause 5.1.1).
    • After inspection, soak in hot (≈90°C) raw linseed oil for 1 hour, then wipe dry (Clause 10.1).

Oven Drying Moisture Content Calculation

[ \text{Moisture Content (%)} = \frac{W_{wet} - W_{dry}}{W_{dry}} \times 100 ]

  • (W_{wet}): Weight before drying
  • (W_{dry}): Weight after drying at 103±2°C until constant weight

Loading diagram...

This ensures durability and performance of wooden tool handles per IS

?What types of defects are allowed in finished wooden tool handles?

According to IS 620 Clause 8.1 and Table 1, the following defects are permissible in finished wooden tool handles:

DefectLength of HandlePermissible Extent
Deviation of grainAll lengthsMax 1 in 20 (i.e., slight grain deviation)
Pin knotsUp to 30 cmNone
Over 30 cmOnly one knot allowed beyond two-thirds length from tool end
SapwoodAt waistNone
Other places up to 30 cmNone
Other places over 30 cmMax 20% sapwood allowed

Note: Unlimited sapwood is allowed for handles made from axle wood, yon, kardahi, ash, black chuglam, haldu, and kaim.

Additional points from the standard:

  • Handles must be free from pith, decay, checks, shakes, splits (except minor hair splits), borer holes, and warp.
  • Moisture content of blanks should be between 8% and 15%.
  • Visual inspection is mandatory; defective handles must be rejected.

This ensures durability and utility of tool handles while allowing minor natural wood variations.

?What testing procedures ensure the durability and performance of wooden tool handles?

To ensure durability and performance of wooden tool handles per IS 620, the following testing procedures are applied:

1. Visual Examination (Clause 1.2)

  • Inspect all handles for defects, workmanship, and finish.
  • Reject any handle with visible flaws.
  • Only defect-free handles proceed to mechanical tests.

2. Striking Test (Clause 9.1.3)

  • Fit handles to dummy heads of heavy, medium, or light striking tools.
  • Strike the tool 12 times against a block of sal wood or harder.
  • Handles must show no signs of failure (cracks, splits, loosening).

3. Sampling (Clause 11.1, Appendix F)

  • Handles are sampled from lots for testing to ensure consistent quality.

4. Material Suitability (Clause 2.1.1)

  • Timber species chosen based on:
    • Shock resistance
    • Bending strength
    • Resilience
    • Stiffness
    • Hardness

Summary Table: Key Test Parameters

Test TypeMethodAcceptance Criteria
Visual InspectionCheck for defects/workmanshipNo visible defects
Striking Test12 strikes on dummy headNo failure or damage
SamplingRandom sampling per lotRepresentative testing
Loading diagram...

These tests ensure handles are safe, durable, and perform well under impact.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 620. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required