IS 5978-1970 provides a comprehensive code of practice for designing wood poles used in overhead power transmission and telecommunication lines in India. It covers both broad-leaved and coniferous timber species, detailing classification by strength, design loads including wind effects, and stability considerations for poles with or without stays. This standard is essential for engineers and designers involved in selecting and sizing wood poles to ensure safety, durability, and compliance with Indian conditions.
Overview
IS 5978-1970 provides a comprehensive code of practice for designing wood poles used in overhead power transmission and telecommunication lines in India. It covers both broad-leaved and coniferous timber species, detailing classification by strength, design loads including wind effects, and stability considerations for poles with or without stays. This standard is essential for engineers and designers involved in selecting and sizing wood poles to ensure safety, durability, and compliance with Indian conditions.
Audience
Contents
Structure
IS 5978: Scope & Key Specifications for Wood Poles
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| de | Effective diameter of pole | cm |
| Do | Diameter at ground level | cm |
| DT | Diameter at top | cm |
| H | Height above ground level | m |
| Lg | Depth of setting in ground | m |
| M | Total overturning moment at ground | kg·m |
| P | Design wind pressure | kg/m² |
| R | Ultimate modulus of rupture (bending) | kg/cm² |
| Height Above Ground (m) | Min Circumference at Ground Level (cm) | Min Circumference at Top (cm) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 50 - 70 (varies by class) | 30 - 57 |
| 8.0 | 57 - 78 | 35 - 63 |
| 10.0 | 62 - 84 | 36 - 68 |
| 14.0 | 71 - 96 | 42 - 78 |
Choose stoutest, straightest poles for unstable ground.
flowchart TD
A[Wood Pole Design] --> B[Determine Height (H) & Setting Depth (Lg)]
B --> C[Select Diameter at Ground (Do) & Top (DT)]
C --> D[Calculate Effective Diameter (de)]
D --> E[Calculate
| Height (m) | Circumference at Ground Level (cm) | Circumference at Top (cm) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 40 - 70 (depending on class) | 26 - 57 |
| 10 | 48 - 78 | 30 - 52 |
| 14 | 54 - 96 | 30 - 57 |
(Refer to Table 2 in IS 5978 for detailed class-wise values)
flowchart TD
A[Select Pole Class] --> B{Measure Height}
B -->|6m to 14m| C[Check Circumference at Ground Level]
B -->|6m to 14m| D[Check Circumference at Top]
C --> E[Verify against IS 5978 Table 2]
D --> E
E --> F[Confirm Pole Suitability]
For detailed dimensions and contact info, see IS 5978 Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.
IS 5978 - Definitions & Symbols (Clause 3.1)
| Symbol | Meaning | Units |
|---|---|---|
| de | Effective diameter of pole | cm |
| Do | Diameter at ground level | cm |
| DT | Diameter at pole top | cm |
| H | Height of pole above ground | m |
| L1 | Height of highest conductor | m |
| La | Height of next highest conductor | m |
| Ly | Full length of pole | m |
| Lg | Depth of pole setting in ground | m |
| Le | Effective length (Le = Ly - Lg) | m |
| M | Total overturning moment at ground line | kg·m |
| Mc1 | Overturning moment from wind on top conductor | kg·m |
| Mc2 | Overturning moment from wind on next highest conductor | kg·m |
| Mp | Overturning moment from wind on pole | kg·m |
| P | Design wind pressure for region | kg/m² |
| Pc | Wind pressure on each conductor | kg/m |
| R | Ultimate modulus of rupture in static bending | kg/cm² |
[ L_e = L_y - L_g ]
flowchart TD
A[Full Length (Ly)] -->|Subtract| B[Depth of Setting (Lg)]
B -->|Result| C[Effective Length (Le)]
C --> D[Calculate Overturning Moment (M)]
D --> E[Design Checks]
This summary aids in understanding pole geometry and loadings per IS 5978.
IS 5978 - Key Specifications for Species of Timber (Clause 5.1.2 & Table 1)
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Species | Botanical and Trade Names of Timber |
| Available Regions | Geographic areas where species are commonly found |
| Average Weight at 12% Moisture (kg/m³) | Density of timber at standard moisture content |
| Static Bending Strength (kg/cm²) | Ultimate modulus of rupture in bending (green condition) |
| Modulus of Elasticity (×1000 kg/cm²) | Stiffness of timber under load |
| Maximum Crushing Stress (kg/cm²) | Compressive strength along grain |
| Shearing Stress (kg/cm²) | Shear strength along grain |
| Species (Trade Name) | Avg. Weight | Bending Strength | Modulus of Elasticity | Crushing Stress | Shearing Stress |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teak (Tectona grandis) | 625 kg/m³ | 685 kg/cm² | 90 × 1000 kg/cm² | 340 kg/cm² | 90 kg/cm² |
| Bruguiera spp. | 893 kg/m³ | 1095 kg/cm² | 175 × 1000 kg/cm² | 570 kg/cm² | 110 kg/cm² |
flowchart TD
A[Species of Timber] --> B[Average Weight @ 12% Moisture]
A --> C[Static Bending Strength]
A --> D[Modulus of
IS 5978: Classification & Strength of Wood Poles
| Class | Ultimate Breaking Load (kg) |
|---|---|
| 1 | ≥ 1350 |
| 2 | 1100 to <1350 |
| 3 | 850 to <1100 |
| 4 | 700 to <850 |
| 5 | 550 to <700 |
| 6 | 400 to <550 |
| 7 | 300 to <400 |
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| de | Effective diameter of pole | cm |
| Do | Diameter at ground level | cm |
| DT | Diameter at top | cm |
| H | Height above ground level | m |
| Ly | Full length of pole | m |
| Lg | Depth of setting in ground | m |
| Le | Effective length (Ly - Lg) | m |
| M | Total overturning moment | kg·m |
| R | Ultimate modulus of rupture | kg/cm² |
[ M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ]
Where:
IS 5978: Mechanical Properties of Timber (Key Points)
| Property | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture Content | % | Typically 12% (green condition) |
| Static Bending Strength (Modulus of Rupture) | kg/cm² | Resistance to bending failure |
| Modulus of Elasticity | kg/cm² | Stiffness of timber |
| Maximum Crushing Stress | kg/cm² | Compressive strength parallel to grain |
| Specific Gravity (Density) | kg/m³ | Average weight of timber |
graph LR
A[Group A: ≥ 850 kg/cm²] --> Strongest
B[Group B: 630-850 kg/cm²] --> Medium Strength
C[Group C: 450-630 kg/cm²] --> Moderate Strength
Note: Strength values are for small clear specimens in green condition; actual pole strength may vary due to defects and treatment effects.
IS 5978: Loads on Wood Poles – Key Formulas and Specifications
[ M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ]
Where:
| Max Height (m) | Class 1 (cm) | Class 2 (cm) | Class 3 (cm) |
IS 5978: Design of Wood Poles - Key Points
| Height Above Ground (m) | Minimum Circumference at Ground Level (cm) | Minimum Circumference at Top (cm) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 60 (Class 1A) to 45 (Class 6C) | 50 (Class 1A) to 30 (Class 6C) |
| 10.2 | 78 (Class 1A) to 59 (Class 6C) | 63 (Class 1A) to 42 (Class 6C) |
| 12.0 | 83 (Class 1A) to 63 (Class 6C) | 67 (Class 1A) to 35 (Class 6C) |
(Refer to Table 2 for full classification and group details)
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| de | Effective diameter of pole (cm) |
| Do | Diameter at ground level (cm) |
| DT | Diameter at top of pole (cm) |
| H | Height above ground (m) |
| Lg | Depth of setting in ground (m) |
| Le | Effective length = H - Lg (m) |
| M | Total overturning moment at ground (kg·m) |
| R | Ultimate modulus of rupture (kg/cm²) |
[ \sigma = \frac{M \times c}{I} \leq R ]
Where:
Key Points:
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| de | Effective diameter of pole | cm |
| Do | Diameter at ground level | cm |
| DT | Diameter at top of pole | cm |
| H | Height above ground | m |
| Lg | Depth of pole setting in ground | m |
| Le | Effective length (H - Lg) | m |
| M | Total overturning moment | kg·m |
| Mc1, Mc2 | Moments due to wind on conductors | kg·m |
| Mp | Moment due to wind on pole | kg·m |
| P | Design wind pressure | kg/m² |
| R | Ultimate modulus of rupture | kg/cm² |
[ M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ]
Convert M to equivalent load at 60 cm from top for design.
Select pole size from Table 2 based on height and class with minimum circumference satisfying the moment.
Iterate including (M_p)
Key Formula for Crippling Load due to Vertical Components in Stays:
[ P_c = \frac{P_u}{K_t \times K_g \times K_s} ]
Where:
[ M_u = \frac{32 \times 100 \times R}{X} ]
Where (X) is the diameter at ground line (cm).
| Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| (K_t) | Accounts for tapered pole sections |
| (K_g) | Accounts for imperfect ground rigidity |
| (K_s) | Accounts for pole-top stability due to stays and wires |
flowchart LR
A[Vertical Forces in Stays] --> B[Calculate Vertical Component]
B --> C[Apply Factors: K_t, K_g, K_s]
C --> D[Determine Crippling Load on Pole]
D --> E[Check Against Ultimate Load Capacity]
E --> F{Safe or Unsafe?}
F -->|Safe| G[Design Approved]
F -->|Unsafe| H[Revise Design or Pole Selection]
Note: Always verify pole stability with respect to local soil conditions and stay arrangement per IS 5978 guidelines.
Safety Factors in IS 5978
Minimum Factor of Safety (Clause 2.5):
[
\text{Factor of Safety} \geq \max(2.5, \text{Statutory Rules})
]
Ultimate Resisting Moment at Ground Line (Clause 8.5):
Let:
Then,
[
\text{Ultimate resisting moment} = 32 \times X \times 100 \times R \quad \text{(kg·m)}
]
Factor of Safety:
[
\text{FOS} = \frac{32 \times 100 \times X \times R}{M}
]
Safe Working Load (Clause 8.7):
[
\text{Safe Working Load} = \frac{\text{Breaking Load}}{\text{Factor of Safety}}
]
Crippling Load with Stays (Clause 8.8):
Takes into account:
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate modulus of rupture | ( R ) | kg/cm² | Depends on pole species |
| Section modulus | ( X ) | cm³ | At ground line |
| Resulting moment | ( M ) | kg·m | From wind and loads |
| Factor of Safety | FOS | - | ≥ 2.5 or statutory minimum |
flowchart TD
A[Calculate Section Modulus (X)] --> B[Determine Ultimate Rupture Modulus (
Reference Standard:
Specimen Preparation:
Small clear specimens are cut from poles avoiding defects to test mechanical properties.
Load Application:
Loads assumed on full-size poles per IS 1900-1961 method.
Diameter Measurement:
| Pole Class | Diameter at 1.8 m from Butt (cm) | Diameter at Top (cm) |
|---|---|---|
| H | As per Table 8 (IS 5978 Clause 1.8) | As per Table 8 |
Bending Test:
Apply lateral load at specified height; measure deflection and failure load.
Compression Test:
Axial load applied to determine crushing strength.
Shear Test:
Evaluate resistance to shear forces.
[ \sigma_b = \frac{M}{Z} = \frac{P \times L}{\frac{\pi}{32} \times d^3} ]
Where:
flowchart TD
A[Specimen Preparation] --> B[Load Application as per IS 1900]
B --> C[Measure Diameter at 1.8 m and Top]
C --> D{Testing Types}
D --> E[Bending Test]
D --> F[Compression Test]
D --> G[Shear Test]
E --> H[Calculate Bending Stress]
Note: Always select straight, stout poles for testing to ensure reliability. Use IS
IS 5978 Annexures and Tables Key Points
| Species Example | Density | Modulus of Rupture | Modulus of Elasticity | Max Crushing Stress | Shearing Stress |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruguiera spp. | 893 | 1095 | 175 | 570 | 110 |
| Hopes paroifors (Beres) | 995 | 930 | 130 | 590 | 115 |
| Teak (Tectona grandis) | 625 | 685 | 90 | 340 | 90 |
flowchart TD
A[Select Timber Species] --> B{Check Mechanical Properties}
B --> C[Density]
B --> D[Modulus of Rupture]
B --> E[Modulus of Elasticity]
B --> F[Max Crushing Stress]
B --> G[Shearing Stress]
C --> H[Design Pole Dimensions]
D --> H
E --> H
F --> H
G --> H
H --> I[Final Pole Selection]
For full tables and detailed annexures, refer to IS 5978 official document.
Frequently Asked
IS 5978 classifies wood poles into seven strength classes based on their ultimate breaking load:
| Class | Ultimate Breaking Load (kg) |
|---|---|
| 1 | Not less than 1350 |
| 2 | 1100 to 1350 |
| 3 | 850 to 1100 |
| 4 | 700 to 850 |
| 5 | 550 to 700 |
| 6 | 400 to 550 |
| 7 | 300 to 400 |
This classification ensures poles meet load requirements for overhead power and telecom lines per IS 5978.
Recommended Timber Species for Wood Poles as per IS 5978
| Group | Strength Range (Modulus of Rupture, kg/cm²) | Timber Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| A | ≥ 850 | Very strong timber |
| B | 630 to < 850 | Strong timber |
| C | 450 to < 630 | Moderately strong timber |
These groups guide selection for wood poles but actual pole strength also depends on natural defects, seasoning, and treatment.
For detailed species names, refer to Table 1 of IS 5978, which lists broad-leaved and coniferous species grown in India suitable for poles.
Related standards for full-size and jointed poles:
Summary: Choose species from Group A or B for higher strength poles; Group C species are moderate strength. Always verify with Table 1 for specific species.
According to IS 5978 and referenced IS 802 (Part I)-1967, wind loads on poles and conductors are calculated as follows:
Loading diagram...
This iterative approach ensures safe and economical pole design under wind loads.
When designing poles with stays for stability (IS 5978):
Key factors considered (Clause 8.8):
Additional design considerations:
[ P_{cr} = \frac{\pi^2 E I}{(kL)^2} ]
Where:
Loading diagram...
This holistic approach ensures the pole with stays remains stable under combined wind and mechanical loads.
According to IS 5978, the selection of wood pole size and dimensions for overhead lines involves:
| Height Above Ground | Circumference (cm) |
|---|---|
| 6 m | 60 |
| 8 m | 66 |
| 10 m | 73 |
| 12 m | 78 |
| 14 m | 83 |
Loading diagram...
This ensures a safe and economical pole design per IS 5978.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 5978. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required