IS 59781970AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Code of practice for the design of wood poles for overhead power and telecommunication lines

IS 5978-1970 provides a comprehensive code of practice for designing wood poles used in overhead power transmission and telecommunication lines in India. It covers both broad-leaved and coniferous timber species, detailing classification by strength, design loads including wind effects, and stability considerations for poles with or without stays. This standard is essential for engineers and designers involved in selecting and sizing wood poles to ensure safety, durability, and compliance with Indian conditions.

13Sections
98Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1970Edition
TimberCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 5978 PDF, IS 5978 pdf free download, IS 5978 free download pdf, IS5978 PDF, IS-5978 PDF, IS 5978 1970 PDF, IS 5978:1970 PDF, IS 5978-1970 PDF, IS 5978 (1970) PDF, IS 5978 1970 edition PDF, IS 5978 edition 1970 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 5978-1970 provides a comprehensive code of practice for designing wood poles used in overhead power transmission and telecommunication lines in India. It covers both broad-leaved and coniferous timber species, detailing classification by strength, design loads including wind effects, and stability considerations for poles with or without stays. This standard is essential for engineers and designers involved in selecting and sizing wood poles to ensure safety, durability, and compliance with Indian conditions.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Electrical Power Transmission Engineers
  • Telecommunication Infrastructure Designers
  • Civil and Structural Engineers
  • Utility Line Installation Contractors
  • Forest and Timber Industry Specialists
  • Quality Assurance and Inspection Professionals
  • Standards Compliance Officers

Key Topics Covered

Classification of wood poles by strength classes
Design loads including wind pressure on poles and conductors
Calculation of overturning moments and bending stresses
Selection of timber species suitable for pole construction
Consideration of tapered pole sections and defects
Use of stays and their impact on pole stability
Standard dimensions and sizing of wood poles
Modulus of rupture and mechanical properties of timber
Setting depth and effective length of poles
Safety factors and load calculations
Design methodology for solid and jointed wood poles
Guidelines for poles in different environmental conditions

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 5978: Scope & Key Specifications for Wood Poles

Scope Summary:

  • Applies to wood poles used in overhead power and telecommunication lines.
  • Covers dimensions, strength, and design parameters.
  • Focus on poles' diameter, height, and setting depth for stability under wind and load.

Key Symbols (Clause 3.1):

SymbolMeaningUnit
deEffective diameter of polecm
DoDiameter at ground levelcm
DTDiameter at topcm
HHeight above ground levelm
LgDepth of setting in groundm
MTotal overturning moment at groundkg·m
PDesign wind pressurekg/m²
RUltimate modulus of rupture (bending)kg/cm²

Pole Dimensions (Clause 8.6 - Table 2):

Height Above Ground (m)Min Circumference at Ground Level (cm)Min Circumference at Top (cm)
6.050 - 70 (varies by class)30 - 57
8.057 - 7835 - 63
10.062 - 8436 - 68
14.071 - 9642 - 78

Choose stoutest, straightest poles for unstable ground.


Design Considerations:

  • Use diameter at 1.8 m from butt for strength checks.
  • Account for overturning moments due to wind on pole and conductors.
  • Ensure pole setting depth (Lg) provides stability.
  • Refer to modulus of rupture (R) for bending strength.

flowchart TD
    A[Wood Pole Design] --> B[Determine Height (H) & Setting Depth (Lg)]
    B --> C[Select Diameter at Ground (Do) & Top (DT)]
    C --> D[Calculate Effective Diameter (de)]
    D --> E[Calculate
2References

IS 5978 Key References & Specifications Summary

1. Pole Dimensions (Clause 8.6, Table 2)

  • Minimum circumference at ground level and top for wood poles varies by class and height.
  • Heights range from 6 m to 14 m.
  • Circumference values (cm) differ by class groups (A, B, C).
Height (m)Circumference at Ground Level (cm)Circumference at Top (cm)
640 - 70 (depending on class)26 - 57
1048 - 7830 - 52
1454 - 9630 - 57

(Refer to Table 2 in IS 5978 for detailed class-wise values)

2. Diameter Reference (Clause 1.8)

  • Diameter measurements at 1.8 m from butt and at the top are critical.
  • Use stoutest and straightest poles for stability, especially on unstable grounds.

3. Important Notes

  • Use values with caution on abnormally unstable grounds.
  • Select poles carefully for stability and durability.

Practical Tip:

  • For design, always verify pole class and ground conditions.
  • Refer to IS 5978 Table 2 for exact dimensions per pole class.
flowchart TD
    A[Select Pole Class] --> B{Measure Height}
    B -->|6m to 14m| C[Check Circumference at Ground Level]
    B -->|6m to 14m| D[Check Circumference at Top]
    C --> E[Verify against IS 5978 Table 2]
    D --> E
    E --> F[Confirm Pole Suitability]

For detailed dimensions and contact info, see IS 5978 Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.

3Definitions and Symbols

IS 5978 - Definitions & Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaningUnits
deEffective diameter of polecm
DoDiameter at ground levelcm
DTDiameter at pole topcm
HHeight of pole above groundm
L1Height of highest conductorm
LaHeight of next highest conductorm
LyFull length of polem
LgDepth of pole setting in groundm
LeEffective length (Le = Ly - Lg)m
MTotal overturning moment at ground linekg·m
Mc1Overturning moment from wind on top conductorkg·m
Mc2Overturning moment from wind on next highest conductorkg·m
MpOverturning moment from wind on polekg·m
PDesign wind pressure for regionkg/m²
PcWind pressure on each conductorkg/m
RUltimate modulus of rupture in static bendingkg/cm²

Key Formula:

[ L_e = L_y - L_g ]

  • Le is effective pole length for bending moment calculations.
  • Overturning moment ( M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ).

Notes:

  • Use diameters at 1.8 m from butt and at top for design.
  • Select stoutest, straightest poles for stability.
  • Wind pressures (P) and (Pc) depend on regional data (refer IS 875 for wind loads).

flowchart TD
    A[Full Length (Ly)] -->|Subtract| B[Depth of Setting (Lg)]
    B -->|Result| C[Effective Length (Le)]
    C --> D[Calculate Overturning Moment (M)]
    D --> E[Design Checks]

This summary aids in understanding pole geometry and loadings per IS 5978.

4Species of Timber

IS 5978 - Key Specifications for Species of Timber (Clause 5.1.2 & Table 1)

ParameterDescription
SpeciesBotanical and Trade Names of Timber
Available RegionsGeographic areas where species are commonly found
Average Weight at 12% Moisture (kg/m³)Density of timber at standard moisture content
Static Bending Strength (kg/cm²)Ultimate modulus of rupture in bending (green condition)
Modulus of Elasticity (×1000 kg/cm²)Stiffness of timber under load
Maximum Crushing Stress (kg/cm²)Compressive strength along grain
Shearing Stress (kg/cm²)Shear strength along grain

Example from Table 1:

Species (Trade Name)Avg. WeightBending StrengthModulus of ElasticityCrushing StressShearing Stress
Teak (Tectona grandis)625 kg/m³685 kg/cm²90 × 1000 kg/cm²340 kg/cm²90 kg/cm²
Bruguiera spp.893 kg/m³1095 kg/cm²175 × 1000 kg/cm²570 kg/cm²110 kg/cm²

Important Symbols (Clause 3.1):

  • de: Effective diameter of pole (cm)
  • Do: Diameter at ground level (cm)
  • H: Height above ground (m)
  • M: Overturning moment at ground line (kg·m)
  • R: Ultimate modulus of rupture (static bending) (kg/cm²)

Notes:

  • Poles are designed using the modulus of rupture in green condition (wet timber).
  • Species are grouped based on strength properties for design.
  • Dimensions vary with species strength and defects.

flowchart TD
    A[Species of Timber] --> B[Average Weight @ 12% Moisture]
    A --> C[Static Bending Strength]
    A --> D[Modulus of
5Classification and Strength of Wood Poles

IS 5978: Classification & Strength of Wood Poles


1. Classification of Wood Poles (Clause 5.1)

ClassUltimate Breaking Load (kg)
1≥ 1350
21100 to <1350
3850 to <1100
4700 to <850
5550 to <700
6400 to <550
7300 to <400

2. Key Dimensions (Table 2, Clauses 5.1.3, 8.6)

  • Dimensions given as minimum circumference (cm) at ground level and top for different classes and timber groups.
  • Example for Class 1, Group A at 6 m height above ground:
    • Ground circumference = 60 cm
    • Top circumference = 50 cm

3. Symbols & Parameters (Clause 3.1)

SymbolDescriptionUnit
deEffective diameter of polecm
DoDiameter at ground levelcm
DTDiameter at topcm
HHeight above ground levelm
LyFull length of polem
LgDepth of setting in groundm
LeEffective length (Ly - Lg)m
MTotal overturning momentkg·m
RUltimate modulus of rupturekg/cm²

4. Strength Considerations

  • Ultimate breaking load depends on:
    • Modulus of rupture (R) of species (Table 1, not shown here)
    • Uniformity of taper
    • Defects and their location

5. Formula for Overturning Moment (Example)

[ M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ]

Where:

  • (M_{c1}, M_{c2}) = moments due to wind on conductors
  • (M
6Mechanical Properties of Timber

IS 5978: Mechanical Properties of Timber (Key Points)

1. Timber Groups by Modulus of Rupture (Clause 4.1)

  • Group A (Very Strong): Modulus of rupture ≥ 850 kg/cm²
  • Group B (Strong): 630 ≤ Modulus of rupture < 850 kg/cm²
  • Group C (Moderately Strong): 450 ≤ Modulus of rupture < 630 kg/cm²

2. Key Mechanical Properties (From Table 1, Clause 5.1.2)

PropertyUnitDescription
Moisture Content%Typically 12% (green condition)
Static Bending Strength (Modulus of Rupture)kg/cm²Resistance to bending failure
Modulus of Elasticitykg/cm²Stiffness of timber
Maximum Crushing Stresskg/cm²Compressive strength parallel to grain
Specific Gravity (Density)kg/m³Average weight of timber

3. Example Values for Teak (Terminalia grandis)

  • Moisture Content: ~12%
  • Static Bending Strength: 685 kg/cm²
  • Modulus of Elasticity: 90,000 kg/cm²
  • Maximum Crushing Stress: 340 kg/cm²
  • Average Weight: 625 kg/m³

4. Important Symbols (Clause 3.1)

  • de: Effective diameter (cm)
  • Do: Diameter at ground level (cm)
  • H: Height of pole above ground (m)
  • M: Total overturning moment (kg·m)
  • R: Ultimate modulus of rupture (kg/cm²)

Summary Diagram: Timber Strength Groups

graph LR
A[Group A: ≥ 850 kg/cm²] --> Strongest
B[Group B: 630-850 kg/cm²] --> Medium Strength
C[Group C: 450-630 kg/cm²] --> Moderate Strength

Note: Strength values are for small clear specimens in green condition; actual pole strength may vary due to defects and treatment effects.

7Loads on Wood Poles

IS 5978: Loads on Wood Poles – Key Formulas and Specifications


1. Key Symbols (Clause 3.1)

  • de = Effective diameter of pole (cm)
  • Do = Diameter at ground level (cm)
  • DT = Diameter at the top (cm)
  • H = Height above ground (m)
  • Lg = Depth of setting (m)
  • Le = Effective length = L - Lg (m)
  • M = Total overturning moment at ground line (kg·m)
  • Mc1, Mc2 = Overturning moments due to wind on conductors (kg·m)
  • Mp = Overturning moment due to wind on pole (kg·m)
  • P = Design wind pressure (kg/m²)
  • Pc = Wind pressure on conductors (kg/m)
  • R = Ultimate modulus of rupture in bending (kg/cm²)

2. Design Approach (Clause 6.1)

  • Poles are designed as simple cantilevers.
  • Use modulus of rupture (R) in green condition (moisture > 25%).
  • Avoid defects near points of maximum bending stress (critical section).

3. Overturning Moment Calculation

[ M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ]

Where:

  • ( M_{c1} = P_c \times H_1 ) (wind on top conductor)
  • ( M_{c2} = P_c \times H_2 ) (wind on next conductor)
  • ( M_p = P \times d_e \times L_e^2 / 2 ) (wind on pole)

4. Modulus of Rupture (R) and Pole Dimensions

  • Refer Table 1 (not shown here) for R values by timber species.
  • Table 2 (Clause 8.6) provides minimum circumference at ground and top for different classes and species groups.

5. Excerpt from Table 2 (Minimum Circumference at Ground Level)

| Max Height (m) | Class 1 (cm) | Class 2 (cm) | Class 3 (cm) |

8Design of Wood Poles

IS 5978: Design of Wood Poles - Key Points

1. Design Approach (Clause 6.1)

  • Wood poles are designed as simple cantilevers (except when used as struts, cross arms, or braces).
  • Use modulus of rupture in bending for green wood (moisture > 25%) from Table 1 for preliminary design.
  • Position visible defects away from critical sections (max bending stress points).

2. Key Dimensions (Clause 8.6, Table 2)

Height Above Ground (m)Minimum Circumference at Ground Level (cm)Minimum Circumference at Top (cm)
6.060 (Class 1A) to 45 (Class 6C)50 (Class 1A) to 30 (Class 6C)
10.278 (Class 1A) to 59 (Class 6C)63 (Class 1A) to 42 (Class 6C)
12.083 (Class 1A) to 63 (Class 6C)67 (Class 1A) to 35 (Class 6C)

(Refer to Table 2 for full classification and group details)

3. Important Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaning
deEffective diameter of pole (cm)
DoDiameter at ground level (cm)
DTDiameter at top of pole (cm)
HHeight above ground (m)
LgDepth of setting in ground (m)
LeEffective length = H - Lg (m)
MTotal overturning moment at ground (kg·m)
RUltimate modulus of rupture (kg/cm²)

4. Basic Bending Stress Formula

[ \sigma = \frac{M \times c}{I} \leq R ]

Where:

  • (M) = bending moment (kg·cm)
  • (c) =
9Selection of Pole Size

Selection of Pole Size (IS 5978: Clause 8.6 & 8.7)

Key Points:

  • Pole size is selected based on standard dimensions given in Table 2 (Clause 8.6).
  • Table 2 provides minimum circumferences at ground level and top for various pole heights and classes.
  • Pole height is measured above ground level (H), and circumferences are given in cm.
  • The safe working load = breaking load / factor of safety (Clause 8.7).
  • The total overturning moment (M) at ground line due to wind loads on wires and pole is converted to an equivalent load at 60 cm from the top.
  • Initial design can ignore pole wind load; calculate for wire wind load first, then iterate including pole wind load.

Important Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaningUnit
deEffective diameter of polecm
DoDiameter at ground levelcm
DTDiameter at top of polecm
HHeight above groundm
LgDepth of pole setting in groundm
LeEffective length (H - Lg)m
MTotal overturning momentkg·m
Mc1, Mc2Moments due to wind on conductorskg·m
MpMoment due to wind on polekg·m
PDesign wind pressurekg/m²
RUltimate modulus of rupturekg/cm²

Pole Selection Procedure Summary

  1. Calculate overturning moment (M):

[ M = M_{c1} + M_{c2} + M_p ]

  • Start by ignoring (M_p) (wind on pole).
  • Calculate (M_{c1}), (M_{c2}) from wind load on conductors.
  1. Convert M to equivalent load at 60 cm from top for design.

  2. Select pole size from Table 2 based on height and class with minimum circumference satisfying the moment.

  3. Iterate including (M_p)

10Use of Stays and Stability Considerations

Use of Stays and Stability Considerations (IS 5978 - Clause 8.8)

Key Formula for Crippling Load due to Vertical Components in Stays:

[ P_c = \frac{P_u}{K_t \times K_g \times K_s} ]

Where:

  • (P_c) = Crippling load on pole due to vertical stay forces
  • (P_u) = Ultimate crippling load for the pole section
  • (K_t) = Factor for tapered sections
  • (K_g) = Factor for imperfect ground rigidity
  • (K_s) = Factor for stability due to stays and line wires

Important Specifications:

  • Pole Selection: Use the straightest and stoutest poles for stays, especially on unstable grounds (Clause 1.8).
  • Pole Dimensions: Diameter at 1.8 m from butt and at top are critical for design (see Clause 1.8 table).
  • Pole Design: Poles act as simple cantilevers (Clause 6.1).
  • Modulus of Rupture (R): Use green condition values (moisture > 25%) from Table 1.
  • Ultimate Resisting Moment at Ground Line:

[ M_u = \frac{32 \times 100 \times R}{X} ]

Where (X) is the diameter at ground line (cm).


Stability Factors Summary:

FactorDescription
(K_t)Accounts for tapered pole sections
(K_g)Accounts for imperfect ground rigidity
(K_s)Accounts for pole-top stability due to stays and wires

flowchart LR
    A[Vertical Forces in Stays] --> B[Calculate Vertical Component]
    B --> C[Apply Factors: K_t, K_g, K_s]
    C --> D[Determine Crippling Load on Pole]
    D --> E[Check Against Ultimate Load Capacity]
    E --> F{Safe or Unsafe?}
    F -->|Safe| G[Design Approved]
    F -->|Unsafe| H[Revise Design or Pole Selection]

Note: Always verify pole stability with respect to local soil conditions and stay arrangement per IS 5978 guidelines.

11Safety Factors

Safety Factors in IS 5978

  • Minimum Factor of Safety (Clause 2.5):
    [ \text{Factor of Safety} \geq \max(2.5, \text{Statutory Rules}) ]

  • Ultimate Resisting Moment at Ground Line (Clause 8.5):
    Let:

    • ( R ) = Ultimate modulus of rupture (kg/cm²)
    • ( X ) = Section modulus at ground line (cm³)
    • ( M ) = Resulting moment (kg·m)

    Then,
    [ \text{Ultimate resisting moment} = 32 \times X \times 100 \times R \quad \text{(kg·m)} ]

    Factor of Safety:
    [ \text{FOS} = \frac{32 \times 100 \times X \times R}{M} ]

  • Safe Working Load (Clause 8.7):
    [ \text{Safe Working Load} = \frac{\text{Breaking Load}}{\text{Factor of Safety}} ]

    • Overturning moment due to wind on wires and pole converted to equivalent load at 60 cm from top.
    • Pole size selected from Table 2 based on duty.
    • Iterative process to include wind load on pole.
  • Crippling Load with Stays (Clause 8.8):
    Takes into account:

    • Tapered sections
    • Imperfect ground rigidity
    • Pole-top stability from stays and wires

Quick Reference Table (Conceptual)

ParameterSymbolUnitNotes
Ultimate modulus of rupture( R )kg/cm²Depends on pole species
Section modulus( X )cm³At ground line
Resulting moment( M )kg·mFrom wind and loads
Factor of SafetyFOS-≥ 2.5 or statutory minimum

flowchart TD
    A[Calculate Section Modulus (X)] --> B[Determine Ultimate Rupture Modulus (
12Testing Methods

IS 5978: Testing Methods for Wooden Poles

Reference Standard:

  • Testing methods as per IS: 1900-1961 (Methods of testing small clear timber specimens and wood poles).

Key Specifications & Testing Methods:

  • Specimen Preparation:
    Small clear specimens are cut from poles avoiding defects to test mechanical properties.

  • Load Application:
    Loads assumed on full-size poles per IS 1900-1961 method.

  • Diameter Measurement:

    • Diameter at 1.8 m from butt (H) and at top are critical for design and testing.
    • Use these diameters cautiously on unstable grounds.

Important Table (Diameter for Pole Classes):

Pole ClassDiameter at 1.8 m from Butt (cm)Diameter at Top (cm)
HAs per Table 8 (IS 5978 Clause 1.8)As per Table 8

Typical Testing Procedures:

  • Bending Test:
    Apply lateral load at specified height; measure deflection and failure load.

  • Compression Test:
    Axial load applied to determine crushing strength.

  • Shear Test:
    Evaluate resistance to shear forces.


Summary Formula for Bending Stress:

[ \sigma_b = \frac{M}{Z} = \frac{P \times L}{\frac{\pi}{32} \times d^3} ]

Where:

  • (\sigma_b) = bending stress
  • (M) = bending moment = (P \times L)
  • (P) = applied load
  • (L) = load application height
  • (Z) = section modulus for circular cross-section
  • (d) = diameter at test section

flowchart TD
    A[Specimen Preparation] --> B[Load Application as per IS 1900]
    B --> C[Measure Diameter at 1.8 m and Top]
    C --> D{Testing Types}
    D --> E[Bending Test]
    D --> F[Compression Test]
    D --> G[Shear Test]
    E --> H[Calculate Bending Stress]

Note: Always select straight, stout poles for testing to ensure reliability. Use IS

13Annexures and Tables

IS 5978 Annexures and Tables Key Points

1. Pole Dimensions (Clause 1.8)

  • Diameter at 1.8 m from butt (H) and diameter at top (cm) are critical for design.
  • Use straightest, stoutest poles for stability, especially on unstable grounds.

2. Strength of Timber Species (Clause 5.1.2, Table 1)

  • Provides mechanical properties for various timber species in green condition at 12% moisture.
  • Key properties include:
    • Density (kg/m³)
    • Static Modulus of Rupture (kg/cm²)
    • Modulus of Elasticity (×10³ kg/cm²)
    • Maximum Crushing Stress (kg/cm²)
    • Shearing Stress (kg/cm²)
Species ExampleDensityModulus of RuptureModulus of ElasticityMax Crushing StressShearing Stress
Bruguiera spp.8931095175570110
Hopes paroifors (Beres)995930130590115
Teak (Tectona grandis)6256859034090

Usage Notes:

  • Use these values for design and selection of poles.
  • Adjust for specific site conditions and species availability.

flowchart TD
    A[Select Timber Species] --> B{Check Mechanical Properties}
    B --> C[Density]
    B --> D[Modulus of Rupture]
    B --> E[Modulus of Elasticity]
    B --> F[Max Crushing Stress]
    B --> G[Shearing Stress]
    C --> H[Design Pole Dimensions]
    D --> H
    E --> H
    F --> H
    G --> H
    H --> I[Final Pole Selection]

For full tables and detailed annexures, refer to IS 5978 official document.

Popular Questions About IS 5978

?What are the strength classes defined for wood poles in IS 5978?

IS 5978 classifies wood poles into seven strength classes based on their ultimate breaking load:

ClassUltimate Breaking Load (kg)
1Not less than 1350
21100 to 1350
3850 to 1100
4700 to 850
5550 to 700
6400 to 550
7300 to 400

Additional Notes:

  • Wood poles are grouped by timber strength (modulus of rupture in green state):
    • Group A: ≥ 850 kg/cm² (Very strong)
    • Group B: 630–850 kg/cm² (Strong)
    • Group C: 450–630 kg/cm² (Moderately strong)
  • Strength classes consider defects and seasoning effects, so timber group does not directly determine pole class.
  • Pole dimensions for each class and group are provided in IS 5978 Table 2.

This classification ensures poles meet load requirements for overhead power and telecom lines per IS 5978.

?Which timber species are recommended for wood poles under this standard?

Recommended Timber Species for Wood Poles as per IS 5978

  • The standard classifies timber species into three groups based on the modulus of rupture (bending strength) of small clear green specimens (moisture > 25%):
GroupStrength Range (Modulus of Rupture, kg/cm²)Timber Characteristics
A≥ 850Very strong timber
B630 to < 850Strong timber
C450 to < 630Moderately strong timber
  • These groups guide selection for wood poles but actual pole strength also depends on natural defects, seasoning, and treatment.

  • For detailed species names, refer to Table 1 of IS 5978, which lists broad-leaved and coniferous species grown in India suitable for poles.

  • Related standards for full-size and jointed poles:

    • IS 876-1970 (broad-leaved species)
    • IS 6056-1970 (jointed poles)

Summary: Choose species from Group A or B for higher strength poles; Group C species are moderate strength. Always verify with Table 1 for specific species.

?How are wind loads on poles and conductors calculated according to IS 5978?

According to IS 5978 and referenced IS 802 (Part I)-1967, wind loads on poles and conductors are calculated as follows:

Wind Load Calculation:

  • Wind pressure on poles, conductors, and wires must follow IS 802 (Part I)-1967 or relevant statutory rules.
  • Wind load on the pole acts on its cylindrical surface above ground.
  • Wind load on conductors and ground wires acts on the horizontal span.

Design Procedure (Clause 8.7):

  1. Ignore wind load on pole initially; calculate pole size based on wind load on wires only.
  2. Calculate the total overturning moment at ground line due to wind on wires and pole.
  3. Convert overturning moment to an equivalent lateral load applied at 60 cm from the top of the pole.
  4. Select pole size from Table 2 (in IS 5978) based on this load.
  5. Repeat calculations iteratively (trial and error) considering wind load on pole until dimensions converge.

Summary:

  • Wind load on pole = wind pressure × projected cylindrical surface area.
  • Wind load on conductors = wind pressure × projected conductor length × diameter.
  • Use factor of safety:
    [ \text{Safe working load} = \frac{\text{Breaking load}}{\text{Factor of safety}} ]

Loading diagram...

This iterative approach ensures safe and economical pole design under wind loads.

?What factors are considered when designing poles with stays for stability?

When designing poles with stays for stability (IS 5978):

Key factors considered (Clause 8.8):

  • Tapered sections: The pole's changing cross-section affects crippling load capacity.
  • Imperfect ground rigidity: Soil flexibility reduces effective support, influencing stability.
  • Stability at pole-tops: The combined effect of stays and line wires improves top stability.

Additional design considerations:

  • Poles are treated as simple cantilevers (Clause 6.1), designed using the modulus of rupture for green wood (moisture > 25%).
  • The overturning moment from wind loads on wires and poles is converted to an equivalent load at 60 cm from the top (Clause 8.7).
  • Wind load on the pole itself can initially be ignored, focusing on wire loads, then iterated for accuracy.
  • Loads considered include:
    • Wind on pole surface
    • Wind on conductors and ground wires (Clause 7.1)

Crippling Load Formula (from Clause 8.8):

[ P_{cr} = \frac{\pi^2 E I}{(kL)^2} ]

Where:

  • (E) = Modulus of elasticity
  • (I) = Moment of inertia (considering taper)
  • (L) = Effective length of pole under compression
  • (k) = Effective length factor (accounts for ground and top conditions)

Summary Diagram:

Loading diagram...

This holistic approach ensures the pole with stays remains stable under combined wind and mechanical loads.

?How should the size and dimensions of wood poles be selected for overhead lines?

According to IS 5978, the selection of wood pole size and dimensions for overhead lines involves:

Key Points:

  • Pole size is selected based on standard dimensions in Table 2 (Clause 8.6).
  • Start by calculating the required pole size considering the wind load on wires only.
  • Then calculate the total overturning moment due to wind on both wires and pole, converting it to an equivalent load applied at 60 cm from the top (Clause 8.7).
  • Adjust pole dimensions by trial and error until the pole can safely resist the overturning moment.
  • The safe working load = breaking load / factor of safety.
  • Poles are classified by height and duty class; Table 2 provides minimum circumference at ground and top levels for different classes.

Example from Table 2 (minimum circumference at ground level for Class 1, Group A poles):

Height Above GroundCircumference (cm)
6 m60
8 m66
10 m73
12 m78
14 m83

Summary:

  • Use Table 2 for initial size selection.
  • Calculate overturning moments including wind loads.
  • Adjust size iteratively to ensure safety.
  • Refer to IS 876 and IS 6056 for detailed timber specifications.
Loading diagram...

This ensures a safe and economical pole design per IS 5978.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 5978. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required