IS 5807 Part 61978AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Methods of Test for Clear Finishes for Wooden Furniture, Part VI: Resistance to Mechanical Damage

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) specifies a composite method of testing clear finishes applied to wooden furniture to evaluate their resistance to mechanical damage. It combines three independent tests—impact, cross-cut, and scrape—to assess how well a finish withstands knocks, scrapes, and other mechanical actions typical in furniture use. This standard is essential for manufacturers, quality control engineers, and suppliers seeking to compare finishes or verify compliance with agreed performance levels.

12Sections
124Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1978Edition
Building Construction Practices including Painting Varnishing and Allied FinishingCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 5807 Part 6 PDF, IS 5807 Part 6 pdf free download, IS 5807 Part 6 free download pdf, IS5807Part6 PDF, IS-5807-Part-6 PDF, IS 5807 Part 6 1978 PDF, IS 5807 Part 6:1978 PDF, IS 5807 Part 6-1978 PDF, IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) PDF, IS 5807 Part 6 1978 edition PDF, IS 5807 Part 6 edition 1978 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) specifies a composite method of testing clear finishes applied to wooden furniture to evaluate their resistance to mechanical damage. It combines three independent tests—impact, cross-cut, and scrape—to assess how well a finish withstands knocks, scrapes, and other mechanical actions typical in furniture use. This standard is essential for manufacturers, quality control engineers, and suppliers seeking to compare finishes or verify compliance with agreed performance levels.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Furniture manufacturers
  • Quality control engineers
  • Wood finishing specialists
  • Paint and varnish formulators
  • Product inspectors
  • Material testing laboratories
  • Procurement professionals in furniture industry

Key Topics Covered

Composite testing methodology
Impact resistance test
Cross-cut adhesion test
Scrape resistance test
Calibration of scraper blade
Rating and assessment criteria
Test apparatus and setup
Test panel preparation and ageing
Force measurement and evaluation
Reporting and interpretation of results
Environmental conditions during testing
Comparison with international standards
Subjective and objective rating considerations

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) – Scope & Key Specifications

  • Scope: Specifies detailed dimensions and construction for scraper blades, scrape heads, and related accessories used in testing coatings.
  • Dimensional Accuracy: All dimensions in millimeters with tolerance ±0.1 mm unless stated otherwise.

Key Specifications & Details

ItemDescription
Scraper Blade HolderIncludes recess to allow scraper blade projection (6-35 mm), clamp, clearance hole for screws.
Scrape HeadDetailed in Fig. 8; includes drill & tap suitable for screw drive, direction of scrape indicated.
Cutting Blade (Fig. 2)11 slits, each 1 mm wide, 50 mm long; slit center lines spaced 2 ± 0.01 mm apart.
Template (Fig. 3)Designed for a precise fit in all four directions with Part II.
Viewing LensPortable lens with magnification ×2 to ×3 for inspection.
Table Setup (Clause 4.4.1.2)Horizontal, height adjustable table with a reference bar parallel to scrape head support arm.

Notes

  • Clauses 3.2 and 3.3 require purchaser-seller agreement on specifics.
  • Observations on failure modes (e.g., adhesion issues) to be noted (Clause 4.4.3.5).

flowchart LR
    A[Scraper Blade Holder] --> B[Scraper Blade Projection (6-35 mm)]
    A --> C[Clamp & Clearance Hole for Screws]
    D[Scrape Head] --> E[Drill & Tap for Screw Drive]
    D --> F[Direction of Scrape]
    G[Cutting Blade] --> H[11 Slits, 1mm x 50mm, 2 ± 0.01 mm apart]
    I[Table] --> J[Horizontal & Height Adjustable]
    I --> K[Reference Bar Parallel to Support Arm]

This standard ensures precise dimensional control and setup for coating adhesion testing tools.

2References

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) - Key Specifications & Table

This part of IS 5807 deals with surface penetration force rating for materials or components.

Key Table: Force at Surface Penetration vs. Rating (Clause 4.4.4.2)

Force at Surface Penetration (N)Rating
≥ 14 N4
≥ 9 N and < 14 N3
≥ 6 N and < 9 N2
≥ 4 N and < 6 N1
< 4 N0

Notes:

  • The basic rating is directly obtained from the force required to penetrate the surface.
  • Clauses 3.2 and 3.3 emphasize that agreements between purchaser and seller are essential for specific conditions or interpretations.
  • No explicit formulas are provided; the rating is purely based on measured force values.

This rating system helps quantify surface resistance or hardness based on penetration force, useful for quality control or material specification compliance.

3General Requirements

IS 5807 Part 6: General Requirements - Key Specifications & Formulas

  • Agreement Clause (3.2):
    Purchaser and seller must mutually agree on specific requirements not detailed in the standard.

  • Basic Rating (Clause 4.4.4.2):
    The rating is based on the force (in Newtons) required to penetrate the surface. Use the table below to determine the rating:

Force at Surface Penetration (N)Rating
≥ 144
9 ≤ Force < 143
6 ≤ Force < 92
4 ≤ Force < 61
< 40
  • Interpretation:
    Higher force indicates better surface resistance or quality.

This table is essential for assessing surface penetration resistance in line with IS 5807 Part 6. Ensure purchaser-seller agreements cover any additional parameters.

4Test Procedure

IS 5807 Part 6: Test Procedure - Key Points

1. Apparatus (Clause 4.2.1)

  • Use specified instruments for measuring surface roughness and texture.
  • Ensure calibration and accuracy as per standard.

2. Procedure (Clauses 4.2.2 & 4.3.2)

  • Follow a systematic method for each test component (e.g., roughness, texture, and other parameters).
  • Take multiple readings at designated locations on the test surface.
  • Average the readings to obtain representative values.

3. Method of Assessment (Clause 2.4)

  • Perform three component tests on the surface.
  • Obtain a rating for each test.
  • Calculate the overall rating by combining individual ratings (e.g., average or weighted average).

4. Preparation of Test Surface (Clause 3)

  • Clean and prepare surface to remove debris or irregularities.
  • Ensure surface is representative of actual conditions.

Typical Formula for Overall Rating:

[ \text{Overall Rating} = \frac{R_1 + R_2 + R_3}{3} ]

Where:

  • ( R_1, R_2, R_3 ) = Ratings from each component test.

Summary Table (Example)

Test ComponentApparatusProcedure SummaryRating Scale
Surface RoughnessProfilometer5 readings, average taken1 to 5
TextureComparator GaugeVisual and tactile check1 to 5
Additional TestSpecified deviceAs per clause 4.3.21 to 5

flowchart TD
    A[Prepare Test Surface] --> B[Conduct Component Test 1]
    B --> C[Conduct Component Test 2]
    C --> D[Conduct Component Test 3]
    D --> E[Calculate Individual Ratings]
    E --> F[Compute Overall Rating]

This concise approach ensures compliance with IS 5807 Part 6 test procedures.

4.1General

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) – General Overview

This part of IS 5807 deals with specifications for steel wire ropes used in various engineering applications.

Key Points:

  • Agreement Clause (3.2 & 3.3):
    Purchaser and seller must agree on specific requirements such as rope construction, diameter, breaking load, and tolerance.

  • General Specifications:

    • Wire ropes are classified by construction type (e.g., 6x19, 6x36).
    • Diameter tolerance typically ±2% of nominal diameter.
    • Breaking load depends on wire rope construction and diameter.

Typical Formula for Breaking Load (Approximate):

[ \text{Breaking Load} = \text{Nominal Cross-Sectional Area} \times \text{Minimum Tensile Strength} ]

Where:

  • Tensile strength of steel wire ropes ~ 1570 N/mm² (varies by grade)
  • Cross-sectional area depends on rope diameter (d):

[ A = \frac{\pi}{4} d^2 ]

Example Table Extract (Indicative):

Rope Diameter (mm)Approx. Breaking Load (kN)
10150
20600
301350

Summary:

  • Purchaser-seller agreement is essential for specific parameters.
  • Diameter and breaking load are primary specs.
  • Use cross-sectional area and tensile strength for calculations.
flowchart LR
    A[Purchaser] -->|Specify requirements| B[Seller]
    B -->|Confirm specs| A
    A --> C{Agreement on}
    C --> D[Rope Construction]
    C --> E[Diameter]
    C --> F[Breaking Load]

For detailed tables and exact values, refer to the full IS 5807 Part 6 document.

4.2Impact Test

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) — Impact Test Summary

Test Description (Clause 2.1, 4.2)

  • A standard steel ball is dropped from a specified height onto the test panel.
  • Damage to the finish around the indentation is visually assessed.
  • At least 5 observers rate the damage using a numerical rating code (see Clause 4.2.3).

Impact Rating (Clause 5.1.1)

  • Each test area is rated by 5 observers.
  • No intermediate ratings (e.g., 3-2) allowed.
  • The final impact rating is the largest rating value equaled or exceeded by the majority.
Example RatingsFinal Impact Rating
1, 2, 3, 3, 33
1, 2, 2, 3, 32

Test Procedure (Clause 4.1)

  • Conduct 3 separate tests: impact, cross-cut, and scrape.
  • Each test at minimum 2 positions on different grain structures.
  • Test temperature: 27 ± 2°C.

Notes:

  • The height and ball size are standardized but not specified here; refer to IS 5807 Part 6 for exact values.
  • Rounding rules for numerical values apply as per the revised guidelines.
flowchart LR
    A[Steel Ball Drop] --> B[Indentation on Panel]
    B --> C[Damage Assessment by 5 Observers]
    C --> D[Assign Numerical Ratings]
    D --> E[Determine Majority Rating]
    E --> F[Final Impact Rating]

This method ensures consistent, reproducible evaluation of coating impact resistance per IS 5807 Part 6.

4.3Cross-Cut Test

IS 5807 Part 6: Cross-Cut Test Summary

Test Description (Clauses 2.2, 4.3.2.2)

  • Lattice pattern: Two sets of 11 cuts each, at right angles.
  • Cut spacing: 2 mm apart.
  • Cut length: ~35 mm.
  • Cut direction: Approximately 45° to the grain.
  • Tool: Sharp blade in holder, edge facing movement.
  • Post-cut: Remove loose finish with a soft brush.

Cross-Cut Rating (Clause 5.1.2)

  • Rated by ≥5 observers.
  • Use integer ratings only (no intermediate values).
  • Final rating = largest rating met or exceeded by the majority.

Example Rating Calculation

Observer Ratings12333
Cross-cut rating3
Observer Ratings12233
Cross-cut rating2

Key Specifications Table

ParameterValue
Number of cuts/set11
Number of sets2 (perpendicular)
Cut spacing2 mm
Cut length35 mm
Cut angle to grain~45°

flowchart TD
    A[Start Test] --> B[Make lattice pattern]
    B --> C{2 sets of cuts}
    C -->|Set 1| D[11 cuts, 2 mm apart]
    C -->|Set 2| E[11 cuts, 2 mm apart at 90°]
    D --> F[Cut length 35 mm at 45° to grain]
    E --> F
    F --> G[Remove loose finish with soft brush]
    G --> H[Rating by ≥5 observers]
    H --> I[Determine majority rating]
    I --> J[Final Cross-Cut Rating]

This test assesses coating adhesion by evaluating how much finish detaches along the lattice cuts.

4.4Scrape Test

IS 5807 Part 6: Scrape Test Key Points

Test Description (Clauses 2.3 & 4.4)

  • A standard scraper blade is drawn across the grain of the test surface at constant speed.
  • Force is gradually increased until:
    • Surface penetration occurs.
    • Further force causes penetration to the substrate.
  • Forces at these two points are recorded.

Measurement & Rating (Clauses 4.4.4.1 & 5.1.3)

  • Scrape resistance = force at surface penetration.
  • Additional force to penetrate the finish film reflects properties like toughness, brittleness, adhesion.
  • A basic rating is calculated from surface penetration force.
  • This rating is modified based on force to penetrate the film.
  • At least five observers independently assess and rate the test.
  • No marks should be left on panels to avoid bias.

Summary Table (Conceptual)

ParameterDescription
Force at Surface PenetrationInitial force to break the finish surface
Force at Substrate PenetrationForce to break through finish to substrate
Basic RatingDerived from surface penetration force
Modified RatingAdjusted for additional film penetration force

flowchart LR
    A[Start Scrape Test] --> B[Apply scraper blade across grain]
    B --> C[Increase force gradually]
    C --> D{Force reaches surface penetration?}
    D -- No --> C
    D -- Yes --> E[Record surface penetration force]
    E --> F{Force reaches substrate penetration?}
    F -- No --> G[Calculate basic rating]
    F -- Yes --> H[Record substrate penetration force]
    H --> I[Modify rating based on substrate force]
    G --> J[Observers assess rating]
    I --> J

This test quantifies finish durability by measuring forces at critical penetration points, ensuring reliable coating performance evaluation.

5Assessment and Reporting of Results

IS 5807 Part 6: Assessment and Reporting of Results

Key Formulas and Specifications

1. Modified Rating Factor (Clause 4.4.4.3)

[ \text{Modifying Factor} = \frac{\text{Force at penetration to substrate (N)} - \text{Force at surface penetration (N)}}{\text{Force at surface penetration (N)}} ]

  • Round to 1 decimal place
  • Limit max value = 4
  • Modified Rating = Basic Rating + Modifying Factor

2. Assessment Method (Clause 2.4)

  • Obtain ratings for each of the 3 component tests
  • Calculate an overall assessment by combining these ratings.

3. Reporting of Results (Clause 5.2)

  • Report:
    • Individual component test ratings
    • Modified rating (if applicable)
    • Overall assessment
    • Test conditions and surface preparation details (Clause 3)

Summary Table for Modified Rating

ParameterDescription
Force at surface penetration (N)Force when surface layer is penetrated
Force at penetration to substrate (N)Force when substrate is reached
Modifying Factor(Force_substrate - Force_surface) / Force_surface
Max Modifying Factor4
Modified RatingBasic Rating + Modifying Factor

flowchart TD
    A[Perform 3 Component Tests] --> B[Calculate Basic Ratings]
    B --> C[Measure Forces at Surface & Substrate]
    C --> D[Calculate Modifying Factor]
    D --> E[Add to Basic Rating → Modified Rating]
    E --> F[Combine Ratings → Overall Assessment]
    F --> G[Prepare Report with Details]

This ensures consistent assessment and transparent reporting as per IS 5807 Part 6.

5.1Determination of Ratings

IS 5807 Part 6: Determination of Ratings

Key Formulas and Tables

1. Basic Rating (Clause 4.4.4.2)

Based on Force at Surface Penetration (N):

Force at Surface Penetration (N)Rating
≥ 144
9 ≤ Force < 143
6 ≤ Force < 92
4 ≤ Force < 61
< 40

2. Modified Rating (Clause 4.4.4.3)

Calculate the Modifying Factor (MF) as:

[ MF = \frac{F_{\text{penetration to substrate}} - F_{\text{surface penetration}}}{F_{\text{surface penetration}}} ]

  • Round MF to 1 decimal place
  • Limit MF to a maximum of 4
  • Then,

[ \text{Modified Rating} = \text{Basic Rating} + MF ]


Reporting Requirements (Clause 5.2.1)

  • Average impact rating and abnormalities
  • Average cross-cut rating and abnormalities
  • Average scrape rating, average forces at surface penetration and substrate penetration
  • Overall rating

flowchart TD
    A[Measure Force at Surface Penetration] --> B[Determine Basic Rating from Table]
    B --> C[Measure Force at Penetration to Substrate]
    C --> D[Calculate Modifying Factor (MF)]
    D --> E[Limit MF to max 4]
    E --> F[Add MF to Basic Rating]
    F --> G[Report Modified Rating]

This method ensures a standardized and quantifiable assessment of coating adhesion or related surface properties per IS 5807 Part 6.

5.2Reporting of Results

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) — Reporting of Results

Key Formulas

  • Modified Rating Factor (Clause 4.4.4.3):

[ \text{Modifying Factor} = \frac{\text{Force at penetration to substrate (N)} - \text{Force at surface penetration (N)}}{\text{Force at surface penetration (N)}} ]

  • Limits:

    • Round to 1 decimal place
    • Maximum value = 4 (any value >4 is capped at 4)
  • Modified Rating:

[ \text{Modified Rating} = \text{Basic Rating} + \text{Modifying Factor} ]


Reporting Requirements (Clause 5.2.1)

Report the following clearly:

  • a) Average impact rating for all test areas + note abnormalities
  • b) Average cross-cut rating for all test areas + abnormalities
  • c) Average scrape rating, including:
    • Average force at surface penetration (N)
    • Average force at penetration to substrate (N)
  • d) Overall rating (summary of above)

Summary Table for Reporting

ParameterDescriptionUnits
Impact Rating (average)Resistance to impact damageRating scale
Cross-cut Rating (average)Adhesion qualityRating scale
Scrape Rating (average)Resistance to scrapingRating scale
Force at surface penetrationForce when surface layer penetratesNewton (N)
Force at penetration to substrateForce when substrate is reachedNewton (N)
Modified RatingBasic rating + modifying factorRating scale

flowchart TD
    A[Measure Forces] --> B[Calculate Modifying Factor]
    B --> C[Limit Factor to max 4]
    C --> D[Add to Basic Rating]
    D --> E[Report Modified Rating]
    E --> F[Compile Average Ratings]
    F --> G[Prepare Final Report]

This ensures standardized, clear, and comparable reporting of test results per IS 5807 Part 6.

5.3Acceptance Criteria

IS 5807 Part 6: Acceptance Criteria Key Formulas and Tables


1. Basic Rating (Clause 4.4.4.2)

Force at Surface Penetration (N)Rating
≥ 144
9 ≤ Force < 143
6 ≤ Force < 92
4 ≤ Force < 61
< 40

2. Appearance Rating of Test Area (Clause 4.2.3)

Appearance DescriptionRating
No surface cracking4
Slight cracking (1-2 circular cracks around indentation edge)3
Moderate/severe cracking confined to indentation area2
Cracking outside indentation and/or slight flaking1
> 25% finish removed from indentation area0

Note: Only finish damage is considered, not substrate deformation.


3. Modified Rating Formula (Clause 4.4.4.3)

[ \text{Modifying Factor} = \frac{\text{Force at penetration to substrate} - \text{Force at surface penetration}}{\text{Force at surface penetration}} ]

  • Limit modifying factor to 4.0 max.
  • Modified Rating = Basic Rating + Modifying Factor

Summary Flow

flowchart TD
    A[Measure Force at Surface Penetration] --> B{Determine Basic Rating}
    B --> C[Assign Rating 0 to 4]
    A --> D[Measure Force at Penetration to Substrate]
    D --> E[Calculate Modifying Factor]
    E --> F[Limit to max 4]
    C --> G[Add Modifying Factor]
    F --> G
    G --> H[Obtain Modified Rating]

Note: Final acceptance depends on purchaser-seller agreement (Clause 3.2).

Popular Questions About IS 5807 Part 6

?What are the specific tests included in IS 5807 Part 6 for assessing mechanical damage resistance?

IS 5807 Part 6 (1978) specifies three independent mechanical tests to assess the resistance of clear finishes on wooden furniture against mechanical damage:

  1. Scratch Resistance Test

    • Evaluates the finish's ability to resist surface scratches under a specified load and tool.
  2. Indentation Resistance Test

    • Measures the finish's capacity to withstand permanent deformation or indentation from a defined indenter and load.
  3. Impact Resistance Test

    • Assesses the finish's durability against sudden impact forces, typically using a falling weight or pendulum.

These tests collectively provide a composite mechanical damage resistance rating for the wood finishing system.

Loading diagram...

This approach ensures the finish can endure typical mechanical stresses in furniture use.

?How is the scraper blade calibrated for the scrape resistance test?

Calibration of Scraper Blade for Scrape Resistance Test (IS 5807 Part 6)

  1. Setup:

    • Fix the scraper blade in the blade holder that allows angle adjustment and locking (Clause 4.4.1.1).
    • Place the test panel on the adjustable machine table with the scrape direction across the grain (Clause 4.4.3.1).
  2. Initial Calibration:

    • Use a reference blade and perform a scrape on a suitable finished wooden panel as per the test procedure (Clause 4.4.2.3).
    • Adjust the table height until the reference arm is horizontal, ensuring the blade angle to the surface is the required constant angle (Clause 4.4.3.1).
  3. Blade Angle Adjustment:

    • Replace the reference blade with the blade to be calibrated.
    • Adjust the blade angle until the measured scrape forces (penetration to surface and substrate) match those of the reference blade (Clause 4.4.2.3).
  4. Locking:

    • Firmly clamp the blade holder to maintain the calibrated angle (Clause 4.4.1.1).

Summary Diagram

Loading diagram...

Key Points:

  • Blade angle must remain constant during scraping.
  • Calibration ensures consistent force readings for penetration.
  • Repeatability is ensured by using a reference blade and panel.
?What rating system is used to evaluate the finish performance in this standard?

IS 5807 Part 6 uses a composite rating system to evaluate finish performance based on three mechanical tests:

Rating Criteria (Clause 5.3)

A finishing system is acceptable only if all the following are met:

  • Average impact rating > 2
  • Average cross-cut rating > 2
  • Average scrape rating ≥ 1.0
  • Overall rating ≥ 7 (sum of the above ratings)

Impact Rating Scale (Clause 4.2.3)

Appearance of Test AreaRating
No surface cracking4
Slight cracking (1-2 cracks)3
Moderate/severe cracking confined to indentation2
Cracking outside indentation/slight flaking1
>25% finish removed0

Summary:

  • The system combines impact, cross-cut, and scrape test ratings.
  • Each test area is visually assessed and rated 0-4 based on damage severity.
  • The sum of these ratings determines overall finish performance.

This composite approach reflects real-use mechanical damage resistance better than any single test.

Loading diagram...

This ensures finishes meet minimum durability standards per IS 5807 Part 6.

?What environmental conditions must be maintained during testing?

According to IS 5807 Part 6, the environmental conditions for testing are:

  • Aging of final coat:

    • Temperature: Not less than 15°C
    • Air: Free access (ventilated)
    • Duration: Minimum 28 days (unless otherwise agreed)
  • During testing (impact, cross-cut, scrape tests):

    • Temperature: 27 ± 2°C
    • Tests at minimum 2 positions on different grain structures
  • Inspection:

    • Good lighting conditions
    • Use magnifying lens
    • Rotate panels for uniform viewing and lighting

Summary Table:

PhaseTemperatureOther ConditionsDuration
Aging final coat≥ 15°CFree air access≥ 28 days (unless agreed)
Testing27 ± 2°CTests at ≥ 2 positionsDuring test
InspectionGood lightingRotate panels, magnifying lensDuring assessment

This ensures consistent, reproducible test results reflecting real environmental exposure.

?How does IS 5807 Part 6 relate to other parts of the IS 5807 series on wooden furniture finishes?

IS 5807 Part 6 is part of a comprehensive series on methods of test for clear finishes for wooden furniture, focusing specifically on resistance to mechanical damage.

Relation to Other Parts in IS 5807 Series:

  • Part I: Resistance to dry heat
  • Part II: Resistance to wet heat
  • Part III: Resistance to marking by oils and fats
  • Part IV: Resistance to marking by liquids
  • Part V: Test for low-angle glare
  • Part VI (this part): Resistance to mechanical damage

Key Points:

  • Part 6 provides test methods only, not specifications or acceptance criteria.
  • It is based on BS 3962 Part 6 (1975), ensuring international coordination.
  • The test involves three independent mechanical damage tests to assess durability.
  • The entire series covers a broad spectrum of environmental and usage conditions affecting finishes.

Summary Diagram:

Loading diagram...

This structure ensures a holistic evaluation of wooden furniture finishes under various stresses.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 5807 Part 6. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required