IS 5258:1969 specifies the method for determining the particle size distribution of powders using an optical microscope. It provides detailed procedures for sample preparation, microscope setup, magnification selection, particle counting, and calculation of size distribution by number and weight. This standard is essential for materials scientists, quality control engineers, and researchers who require precise particle sizing for powders with particles ranging from sub-micron to about 150 microns.
Overview
IS 5258:1969 specifies the method for determining the particle size distribution of powders using an optical microscope. It provides detailed procedures for sample preparation, microscope setup, magnification selection, particle counting, and calculation of size distribution by number and weight. This standard is essential for materials scientists, quality control engineers, and researchers who require precise particle sizing for powders with particles ranging from sub-micron to about 150 microns.
Audience
Contents
Structure
IS 5258: Scope - Key Formulas, Tables, and Specifications
Conversion factors between different particle size measurement methods:
| From → To | Multiply by |
|---|---|
| Sieve → Projected | 1.40 |
| Sieve → Stokes | 0.94 |
| Projected → Sieve | 0.71 |
| Projected → Stokes | 0.67 |
| Stokes → Sieve | 1.07 |
| Stokes → Projected | 1.50 |
| Size Class No. | Size Range (μm) | Mean Size (μm) | Weighting Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.59 – 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.36 |
| 2 | 0.83 – 1.17 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 16 | 106 – 149.9 | 128 | 2,100,000 |
Use weighting factors for calculating size distributions.
flowchart LR
A[Sieve Size] -->|Multiply by 1.40| B[Projected Diameter]
A -->|Multiply by 0.94| C[Stokes Diameter]
B -->|Multiply by 0.71| A
B -->|Multiply by 0.67|
IS 5258: Terms and Definitions - Key Points
Particle Size Definitions (Clause 1.2 & A-1.2):
Shape Factor Conversion Table:
| From → To | Sieve | Projected | Stokes |
|-----------|-------|-----------|--------|
| Sieve | 1 | 1.40 | 0.94 |
| Projected | 0.71 | 1 | 0.67 |
| Stokes | 1.07 | 1.50 | 1 |
Size Classes (Clause 5.6.2, Table 1):
Combined Sieve and Microscope Analysis (Clause 1.4, Table 9):
[ D_{\text{to}} = D_{\text{from}} \times \text{Shape Factor} ]
where shape factors are from the conversion table above.
flowchart LR
A[Sieve Diameter] -->|x1.40| B[Projected Diameter]
A -->|x0.94| C[Stokes Diameter]
B -->|x0.71| A
B -->|x0.67| C
C -->|x1.07| A
C -->|x1.50| B
This standard ensures consistent interpretation of particle sizes across testing methods.
IS 5258 Microscope Equipment Key Specifications & Tables
| Focal Length (mm) | Numerical Aperture (Achromat/Apochromat) | Approx. Magnification at 160 mm Tube Length | Relative Magnification at Eyepiece Graticule | Limit Graticule (microns) | Stage Length (microns) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 0.15 / - | 4-5 or 6 | 1 | 150 | 800 |
| 16 | 0.17 / 0.30 | 9 or 10 | 2 | 75 | 400 |
| 8 | 0.50 / 0.65 | 20 | 4 | 37 | 200 |
| 4 | 0.65 / 0.85 | 40 | 8 | 19 | 100 |
| Oil Immersion 3.7 | - / 0.95 | 40-50 | 8 | 19 | 100 |
| Oil Immersion 1.8 | 1.25 / 1.30 | 80-100 | 16 | 9.4 | 35 |
IS 5258 — Sample Preparation Key Points
Clause 4.2 & 8.1:
Clause 2.3:
Clause 4.1:
| Parameter | Value/Guideline |
|---|---|
| Particles per field of view | ~6 particles (size class specific) |
| Concentration for number dist. | Lower than weight size dist. |
| Sample representativeness | Follow IS 4879-1968 methods |
flowchart TD
A[Gross Sample] --> B[Laboratory Sample (IS 4879)]
B --> C[Intermediate Sample]
C --> D[Analysis Sample (Appendix C)]
D --> E[Slide Preparation with ~6 particles/field]
E --> F[Microscopic Analysis]
This ensures representative and consistent particle size distribution analysis per IS 5258.
IS 5258: Microscope Setup & Illumination Key Points
Essential Components:
Microscope Types:
| Objective Focal Length (mm) | Numerical Aperture (Min) | Approx. Magnification at 160 mm tube length | Size Range (microns) | Min Eyepiece Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 0.15 | 4-6 | 150 - 13+ | 800 |
| 16 | 0.17 | 9-10 | 75 - 6.6 | 400 |
| 8 | 0.50 | 20 | 37 - 3.3 | 200 |
| 4 | 0.65 | 40 | 19 - 1.7 | 100 |
| Oil immersion (1.25 NA) | 1.25 | 80-100 | 9.4 - 0.6 | 35 |
[ M = \frac{\text{Tube length}}{\text{F
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Table 6 | Relative magnifications for matching size classes, minimum numerical aperture, and total magnification |
| Table 7 | Objective focal lengths, numerical apertures, approximate magnifications, eyepiece power, and graticule size in microns |
| Focal Length (mm) | Numerical Aperture | Approx. Magnification at 160 mm tube length | Minimum Eyepiece Power | Graticule Size (microns) | Stage Micrometer Length (microns) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 or 25 | ≥0.15 | 4–6 | 1× | 150 | 800 |
| 16 | ≥0.17 | 9–10 | 2× | 75 | 400 |
| 8 | ≥0.50 | 20 | 4× | 37 | 200 |
| 4 | ≥0.65 | 40 | 8× | 19 | 100 |
| Relative Magnification | Min Numerical Aperture | Min Total Magnification |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.11 | 115 |
| √2 | 0.16 | 160 |
| 2 | 0.23 | 230 |
| 2√2 | 0.32 | 320 |
| 4 | 0.45 |
IS 5258: Graticule Selection and Calibration Key Points
| Circle No. | Diameter (units) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.41 |
| 2 | 2.00 |
| 3 | 2.83 |
| 4 | 4.00 |
| 5 | 5.66 |
| 6 | 8.00 |
| 7 | 11.31 |
Units = 1/100th of grid length.
[ D_n = D_1 \times (\sqrt{2})^{n-1} ]
flowchart LR
A[Start: Select Eyepiece Focal Length] --> B{Determine Magnification}
B --> C[Calculate Relative Magnification (powers of 2, √2)]
C --> D[Select Grid Length (Table 10)]
D --> E[Use Table 5 for Circle Diameters]
E --> F[Mark Graticule with ±2% accuracy]
Summary: Use Table 5 for graticule dimensions, Table 10 for magnification
IS 5258: Field Selection and Sampling Pattern
Clause 14.1.6:
Clause 7.1.1 & Table 5:
| Circle No. | Diameter (units) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.41 |
| 2 | 2.00 |
| 3 | 2.83 |
| 4 | 4.00 |
| 5 | 5.66 |
| 6 | 8.00 |
| 7 | 11.31 |
Clause 8.3.1:
Sampling Pattern Formula:
If total slide area = A, number of fields = n, then spacing between fields = √(A/n) to maintain uniform coverage.
| Parameter | Value / Formula |
|---|---|
| Field Area (control size) | Area of full rectangular grid |
| Field Area (other sizes) | Adjusted per Clauses 14.1.4, 14.1.5, Appendix G |
| Grid Length | 100 units (physical size marked in mm ±2%) |
| Grid Breadth | 50 units |
| Circle Diameters | Geometric progression by √2 (see table above) |
| Sampling Pattern | Regular spaced fields covering equal area |
IS 5258: Number Size Distribution - Key Points & Formulas
Total sample area: [ A = n_+ \times a ]
Particle concentration in class ( i ): [ N_i = \frac{m_i}{A} \quad (\text{particles/mm}^2) ]
Percentage in class ( i ): [ P_i = \frac{m_i}{\sum m_i} \times 100 ]
[ S(P_i) = \sqrt{\frac{P_i (100 - P_i)}{m_i}} ]
| Size Class (µm) | Sample Field Area (a_i) (mm²) | Number of Fields (n_i) | Total Area (n_i a_i) (mm²) | Particles (m_i) | Concentration (N_i) (particles/mm²) | Percentage (P_i) (%) | Std. Error (S(P_i)) (%) | |-----------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------|
IS 5258: Weight Size Distribution Key Points
The expected standard error ( S(Q_i) ) of the percentage ( Q_i ) by weight in each size class is approximately:
[ S(Q_i) = \sqrt{\frac{Q_i (100 - Q_i)}{n}} ]
Note: ( S(Q_i) ) should not exceed 2% for each size class.
| Parameter | Limit |
|---|---|
| Standard error ( S(Q_i) ) | ≤ 2% per size class |
| Percentage by weight ( Q_i ) | Variable (0-100%) |
flowchart TD
A[Sample Collection] --> B[Sieving into Size Classes]
B --> C[Weight Measurement of Each Class]
C --> D[Calculate % Weight \( Q_i \)]
D --> E[Compute Standard Error \( S(Q_i) \)]
E --> F{Is \( S(Q_i) \leq 2\% \)?}
F -- Yes --> G[Accept Distribution]
F -- No --> H[Increase Sample Size or Reanalyze]
Use IS 5258 Clause 10.3 formula and ensure ( S(Q_i) \leq 2% ) for reliable weight size distribution.
IS 5258 - Reproducibility Key Points
[ S(Q_i) \leq 2% ]
| Parameter | Limit |
|---|---|
| Standard error ( S(Q_i) ) | ≤ 2% |
| Particle count in preliminary scan | ~150 (top 3 classes) |
| Particle count in analysis scan | ~25 (per sample area) |
flowchart TD
A[Preliminary Scan] --> B{Count Particles in Top 3 Classes}
B --> C[Estimate Number of Scans]
C --> D[Analysis at Lowest Magnification]
D --> E[Count Particles (~25 per area)]
E --> F[Calculate Size Distribution & Std Error]
F --> G{Is Std Error ≤ 2%?}
G -->|Yes| H[Accept Results]
G -->|No| I[Increase Sample Size / Recount]
This ensures **reliable, reproducible particle size distribution
IS 5258: Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications for Calculation Procedures
Preliminary Scan:
Scan width = graticule grid width; length = 10-20 mm
Count particles in top 3 size classes → estimate scans for ~150 particles
If scans < 5, reduce scan length to get ≥5 scans.
Analysis at Lowest Magnification:
Count particles over required scans, estimate total sample area to contain 25 particles.
Refer Table 11 for a worked example with columns:
| Parameter | Symbol / Unit |
|---|---|
| Area of sample field | (a_i) (mm²) |
| Number of sample fields | (n_i) |
| Total sample area | (n_i \times a_i) (mm²) |
| Number of particles in class | (m_i) |
| Concentration in class | (mr_i = \frac{m_i}{n_i \times a_i}) (particles/mm²) |
| Number percent in class | (P_i = \frac{m_i}{\sum m_i} \times 100%) |
| Standard error | (S(P_r) = \sqrt{\sum (mr_i)}) |
| Size Class No. | Limits (μm) | Arithmetic Mean (d) (μm) | Weighting Factor ((d)') |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.59 - 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.36 |
| 2 | 0.83 - 1.17 | 1. |
IS 5258: Control Size Class and Counting Requirements
[ m = \frac{10000}{E^2} ]
where E = allowable standard error (%).
For E = 2%,
[
m = \frac{10000}{2^2} = 2500
]
| Parameter | Symbol | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Control size class | - | Highest % by number or smallest |
| Mean size of control class | d₀ | Mean particle size in control class |
| Number of particles counted | m₀ | ≥ 25 (or more for >10% weight) |
| Sample area | a₀ | Area from which particles are counted |
flowchart LR
A[Start: Identify Size Classes] --> B{Is most frequent size class known?}
B -- Yes --> C[Select most frequent size class as control size class]
B -- No --> D[Select smallest size class as control size class]
C --> E[Count particles in control size class (m₀ ≥ 25)]
D --> E
E --> F{Is control size class
IS 5258: Examination Order and Sample Area - Key Points
[ n_i \times a_i = n_0 \times a_0 \quad \text{with} \quad n_i > 12 ]
flowchart LR
A[Control Size Class]
B[Field Area \(a_0\)]
C[Number of Fields \(n_0 \geq 12\)]
D[Sample Area \(n_0 \times a_0\)]
E[Other Size Classes]
F[Field Area \(a_i\)]
G[Number of Fields \(n_i\)]
H[Sample Area \(n_i \times a_i = n_0 \times a_0\)]
A --> B --> D
C --> D
E --> F --> H
G --> H
This ensures uniform particle counting conditions across size classes per IS 5258.
IS 5258: Correlation of Particle Size from Different Methods
| From → To | Multiply by |
|---|---|
| Sieve → Projected | 1.40 |
| Sieve → Stokes | 0.94 |
| Projected → Sieve | 0.71 |
| Projected → Stokes | 0.67 |
| Stokes → Sieve | 1.07 |
| Stokes → Projected | 1.50 |
flowchart LR
A[Sieve Size] -->|Multiply 1.40| B[Projected Size]
A -->|Multiply 0.94| C[Stokes Size]
B -->|Multiply 0.71| A
B -->|Multiply 0.67| C
C -->|Multiply 1.07| A
C -->|Multiply 1.50| B
Summary:
Use the above conversion factors to correlate particle sizes from sieve, projected, and Stokes methods, adjusting for particle shape. For unusual shapes, establish specific factors experimentally.
Frequently Asked
According to IS 5258 Clause 6.1 and Table 2, the minimum particle size measurable depends on the numerical aperture (NA) and magnification of the objective lens:
| Objective Magnification | Numerical Aperture (NA) | Min Particle Size (μm) | Recommended Smallest Size Class (μm) | Min Total Magnification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10× Achromatic | 0.17 | 8.8 | 13 - 19 | 170 |
| 40× Achromatic | 0.65 | 2.3 | 3.3 - 4.7 | 650 |
| Objective Magnification | NA | Min Particle Size (μm) | Recommended Smallest Size Class (μm) | Min Total Magnification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100× Apochromatic | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 - 1.2 | 1800 |
Loading diagram...
Control Size Class in IS 5258 is defined and used as follows:
Definition (Clause 13.1.1):
The control size class is the particle size class with the highest number percentage of particles, usually the smallest size class.
Alternate Definition (Clause 14.1.1):
For weight-based analysis, the control size class is the largest size class containing >5% by weight.
Minimum Particle Count (Clause 14.1.2):
At least 25 particles must be counted in the control size class to ensure statistical reliability.
| Parameter | Symbol | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Control size class | - | Highest number % or >5% weight |
| Mean size | ( d_o ) | Mean particle size in class |
| Number of particles | ( m_o ) | Counted in control size class |
| Sample area | ( a_o ) | Area from which particles drawn |
Loading diagram...
According to IS 5258, for accurate particle size analysis:
Minimum total particles counted (all size classes):
≥ 625 (Clause 13.1.2)
Minimum particles counted in control size class:
≥ 25 (Clause 14.1.2)
If control size class >10% by weight, count more than 25.
Minimum fields examined for control size class:
≥ 96 (Clauses 13.1.4 & 14.1.5)
Minimum fields examined for other size classes:
≥ 12, preferably ≥ 24 (Clauses 13.1.4 & 14.1.5)
| Parameter | Minimum Count |
|---|---|
| Total particles (all classes) | 625 |
| Particles in control size class | 25 (more if >10%) |
| Fields for control size class | 96 |
| Fields for other size classes | 12 (preferably 24) |
This ensures statistical accuracy with standard error < 2% as per the code.
Loading diagram...
To prevent particle agglomeration and ensure proper dispersion of powders on slides per IS 5258:
Use a viscous liquid to disperse powders well. If unavailable, select a more mobile liquid plus a dispersing agent to prevent flocculation (Clause 1.2). The choice depends on powder type and requires experimentation.
Adjust particle concentration so each microscope field contains about 3 to 6 particles of the size class examined (Clauses 8.1 & 13.1.6). This avoids overcrowding and ensures statistical reliability.
Spread particles evenly in a regular pattern across the slide to represent the total area uniformly (Clause 8.3.1). For example, count 25 fields in a 20 mm × 20 mm area as shown in Fig. 3.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Particles per field | ~3 to 6 particles |
| Field area (example) | 20 mm × 20 mm (total area) |
| Total particles counted | Minimum 625 (for stats) |
Loading diagram...
This approach ensures uniform dispersion, prevents agglomeration, and provides statistically valid particle size analysis.
According to IS 5258, particle size distribution is calculated as follows:
[ \text{Volume %} = \frac{N_i \times d_i^3}{\sum (N_j \times d_j^3)} \times 100 ]
where (N_i) = number of particles in size class i, (d_i) = diameter of particles in class i.
| Step | By Number | By Weight/Volume |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement | Count particles per size class | Calculate volume from number & diameter³ |
| Expression | % of total particles | % of total volume (or weight) |
| Assumption | Particle shape uniform | Same shape & density |
Loading diagram...
This method ensures consistent and statistically valid particle size distributions.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 5258. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required