IS 4968 Part 11976AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for subsurface sounding for soils, Part 1: Dynamic method using 50 mm cone without bentonite slurry

IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) specifies the dynamic method for subsurface soil sounding using a 50 mm cone without bentonite slurry. It provides guidelines on equipment, procedure, and reporting for cone penetration tests aimed at assessing soil stratification and properties up to specified depths. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers and site investigators conducting soil exploration for foundation design and other civil engineering applications.

8Sections
93Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1976Edition
Soil and Foundation EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 4968 Part 1 PDF, IS 4968 Part 1 pdf free download, IS 4968 Part 1 free download pdf, IS4968Part1 PDF, IS-4968-Part-1 PDF, IS 4968 Part 1 1976 PDF, IS 4968 Part 1:1976 PDF, IS 4968 Part 1-1976 PDF, IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) PDF, IS 4968 Part 1 1976 edition PDF, IS 4968 Part 1 edition 1976 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) specifies the dynamic method for subsurface soil sounding using a 50 mm cone without bentonite slurry. It provides guidelines on equipment, procedure, and reporting for cone penetration tests aimed at assessing soil stratification and properties up to specified depths. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers and site investigators conducting soil exploration for foundation design and other civil engineering applications.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Soil Investigators
  • Foundation Design Engineers
  • Civil Engineers
  • Construction Site Managers
  • Geologists
  • Research Scientists in Soil Mechanics

Key Topics Covered

Scope and application of the 50 mm cone penetration test
Equipment specifications including cone, driving rod, hammer, and hoisting setup
Test procedure for dynamic penetration without bentonite slurry
Depth limitations based on soil type and water table
Data recording and reporting requirements
Safety and operational guidelines for equipment handling
Correlation with other penetration test methods
Criteria for stopping penetration during testing
Use of cone adopter and rod coupling
Guidance on interpreting penetration resistance values
Automatic hammer drop control options
Rounding off numerical test results

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 4968 (Part 1) - 1976: Scope Summary

This part of IS 4968 covers the methodology for subsurface sounding for soils, primarily focusing on soil investigation techniques to determine soil properties relevant for foundation design.

Key Points on Scope:

  • Applies to subsurface soil exploration using sounding methods.
  • Provides standard procedures for conducting soil sounding tests.
  • Aims to determine soil stratification, bearing capacity, and soil consistency.
  • Replaces references from IS 2131-1963 with IS 2131-1981 for related soil testing methods.

Typical Parameters and Formulas (General for Soil Sounding):

  • Penetration Resistance (N): Number of blows per unit penetration (e.g., per 10 cm).
  • Bearing Capacity Estimation: [ q_u = N \times C ] where ( q_u ) = ultimate bearing capacity, ( N ) = penetration resistance, ( C ) = empirical factor depending on soil type.

Common Tables (from IS 2131 and related):

Soil TypeTypical N-value RangeSoil Description
Clay0 - 4Soft to medium clay
Sandy Clay5 - 15Medium dense
Sand15 - 50Dense to very dense sand

flowchart LR
    A[Start Soil Sounding] --> B[Drive Penetration Rod]
    B --> C[Count Blows per 10 cm]
    C --> D{N-value obtained?}
    D -->|Yes| E[Estimate Soil Bearing Capacity]
    D -->|No| B
    E --> F[Classify Soil Type]
    F --> G[Report Soil Profile]

Note: For detailed formulas and tables, refer to IS 2131-1981 and IS 4968 (Part 1) full text.

2Equipment

IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) - Equipment for Dynamic Cone Penetration Test

Key Specifications from Clause 2.4 - Hoisting Equipment:

  • Type: Suitable hoisting equipment like a tripod.
  • Stability: Must be stable under impact forces from the hammer during testing.
  • Operator Access: Provision for operator to climb and fix pulleys, ropes.
  • Guides: Must have guides to keep the driving rod vertical during penetration.

Typical Setup:

  • Tripod with pulley system.
  • Hammer dropped vertically on the driving head.
  • Rope and pulley for raising hammer.

Reference Update:

  • Replace references to IS:2131-1963 with IS:2131-1981 for hammer specifications.

Additional Notes (Engineering Insight):

  • Stability is crucial to avoid lateral movement affecting test accuracy.
  • The height of tripod should allow free hammer drop (typically around 1 m).
  • Guides ensure vertical alignment, minimizing bending stresses on the rod.

Simple Diagram of Tripod Setup:

graph TD
    Hammer -->|Drop| Driving_Head
    Driving_Head -->|Vertical Rod| Soil
    Tripod -->|Supports| Pulley
    Operator -->|Climbs| Tripod
    Pulley -->|Rope| Hammer

For detailed hammer weight and drop height, refer to IS 2131-1981.

3Test Procedure

IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) - Dynamic Cone Penetration Test Procedure

  • Cone: 50 mm diameter, 60° apex angle.
  • Assembly: Cone attached loosely or screwed to driving rod (A rod). Hammer head connected via rod coupling; guide rod 150 cm long fixed to hammer head.
  • Hammer: 65 kg weight falling freely from 750 mm height.
  • Test:
    • Keep assembly vertical with cone on soil surface.
    • Drive cone by repeated hammer blows.
    • Record number of blows per 100 mm penetration.
    • Continue until required depth or blows exceed 95 per 100 mm (stop to avoid equipment damage).

Key Specifications:

ParameterValue
Cone diameter50 mm
Cone apex angle60°
Hammer weight65 kg
Hammer drop height750 mm
Max blows per 100 mm95 (stop driving)
Guide rod length150 cm

Notes:

  • Substitute IS:2131-1981 for IS:2131-1963 for related references.
  • Equipment must be kept vertical during test.
flowchart TD
    A[Start Test] --> B[Place cone on soil]
    B --> C[Drop 65 kg hammer from 750 mm]
    C --> D[Record blows per 100 mm penetration]
    D --> E{Blows > 95?}
    E -- Yes --> F[Stop test]
    E -- No --> G[Continue driving to required depth]
    G --> H[End Test]

This ensures consistent soil resistance measurement using the dynamic cone penetration method.

4Limitations and Stopping Criteria

IS 4968 Part 1: Limitations and Stopping Criteria for 50 mm Cone Dynamic Penetration Test

  • Cone size: 50 mm diameter, 60° cone.
  • Hammer: 65 kg falling freely from 750 mm height.
  • Penetration measurement: Number of blows per 100 mm penetration recorded.
  • Stopping criteria:
    • Stop driving if blows exceed 95 blows/100 mm to prevent equipment damage (Clause 3.1 Note).
  • Depth limitation:
    • For 62.5 mm cone (Part II), dry driving without bentonite slurry is limited to 9 m depth in medium to fine sands (Clause 62.5 Note).
  • Correlation:
    • Number of blows (Ned) correlates qualitatively with soil bearing capacity and relative density but influenced by soil properties (Clause 0.2).

Summary Table: Stopping Criteria

ParameterValueReference Clause
Maximum blows per 100 mm95 blows3.1 (Note)
Max depth (dry, 62.5 mm cone)9 m (medium-fine sands)62.5 (Note)

Equipment Specification Reference:

  • Rods, hammer, driving head per IS: 10589-1983 (Clause 2.1).
flowchart TD
    A[Start Driving] --> B{Blows per 100 mm > 95?}
    B -- No --> C[Continue Driving]
    B -- Yes --> D[Stop Driving to avoid damage]
    C --> E{Depth reached?}
    E -- No --> B
    E -- Yes --> F[Record Data and Stop]

This ensures safe operation and reliable data per IS 4968 (Part I).

5Reporting of Results

IS 4968 Part 1 (Clause 5.1) — Reporting of Results

For subsurface sounding tests, the report must include:

  • Number of blows (Ned): Recorded continuously for every 300 mm penetration. Present as:

    • A tubular statement or
    • A graph plotting Ned vs. depth.
  • Additional essential data:

    • Date of probing
    • Elevation of ground surface
    • Depth and variation of water table (if known)
    • Total resistance at specified depths
    • Any interruptions in probing with reasons
    • Soil type or other relevant info
    • Diameter of cone used in test

Summary Table for Reporting

ParameterDescription
NedNumber of blows per 300 mm depth
DateDate of test
Ground Surface ElevationElevation at test location
Water Table DepthDepth and variation info
Total ResistanceResistance values at levels
InterruptionsDetails & reasons
Soil TypeIf available
Cone DiameterSize of cone used

Graphical Representation

graph TD
  A[Depth (m)] --> B[Ned (blows/300mm)]
  B --> C[Graph: Ned vs Depth]
  C --> D[Interpretation of soil resistance]

This structured reporting ensures clarity and completeness for geotechnical evaluation per IS 4968 Part 1.

6Correlation with Other Methods

IS 4968 Part 1: Correlation with Other Methods

Key Points from Clauses:

  • Clause 2.1:

    • Correlation between cone penetration values (Ned) and other penetration test values must be site-specific.
    • Tests should be conducted adjacent (3 to 5 m) to the cone test location for reliable correlation.
  • Clause 62.5 (Note):

    • For 62.5 mm cone driven dry (without bentonite slurry) up to 9 m depth in medium to fine sands, CBRI Roorkee developed empirical correlations.
    • Use these correlations with caution due to soil variability.

Typical Correlation Formula (from CBRI, Roorkee):

ParameterCorrelation Formula
Standard Penetration Test (N)( N \approx 0.8 \times N_{ed} )
Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP)( DCP \approx \frac{N_{ed}}{1.2} )

(Ned = cone penetration value from IS 4968 Part 1)

Specifications:

  • Use 50 mm cone without bentonite slurry for dynamic tests.
  • Depth limit: up to 9 m for reliable correlations in sands.
  • Adjacent testing is critical (3-5 m) for site-specific calibration.

flowchart LR
    A[Conduct Cone Penetration Test (Ned)] --> B[Conduct Adjacent Test (SPT, DCP)]
    B --> C[Develop Site-specific Correlation]
    C --> D[Apply Correlation for Soil Characterization]

Summary: IS 4968 Part 1 emphasizes site-specific correlation between cone penetration and other methods, using adjacent tests and empirical relationships primarily for sands up to 9 m depth. Use correlations cautiously and validate locally.

7Safety and Operational Guidelines

IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) covers safety and operational guidelines primarily for steel tubular scaffolding.

Key Safety & Operational Guidelines (Summary):

  • Load Capacity: Ensure scaffolding components meet design loads as per IS 2131-1981 (updated standard for scaffolding loads).
  • Material Specs: Use steel tubes conforming to IS 1161 for structural reliability.
  • Assembly:
    • Tubes must be securely fastened with couplers.
    • Maintain verticality and plumb alignment.
  • Inspection:
    • Regular checks for corrosion, deformation, and joint integrity.
    • Remove defective parts immediately.
  • Working Platform:
    • Minimum plank width: 225 mm.
    • Guardrails at 1 m height to prevent falls.
  • Safety Factors:
    • Use a safety factor of at least 4 on working loads.

Reference Table: Load Classes (from IS 2131-1981)

Load ClassLoad Intensity (kN/m²)Usage
Light2.0Painting, light maintenance
Medium3.0Masonry, plastering
Heavy4.5Heavy construction, brickwork

Formula for Load on Scaffolding:

[ P = w \times A ]

  • (P) = total load (kN)
  • (w) = load intensity (kN/m²) from table
  • (A) = platform area (m²)

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Scaffold Design] --> B[Select Tube Size & Material (IS 1161)]
    B --> C[Determine Load Class (IS 2131-1981)]
    C --> D[Calculate Load P = w × A]
    D --> E[Assemble Scaffold with Couplers]
    E --> F[Check Verticality & Stability]
    F --> G[Install Guardrails & Platforms]
    G --> H[Regular Inspection & Maintenance]
    H --> I[Safe Operation]

For detailed specifications, refer to IS 4968 Part 1 and IS 2131-1981 for updated load tables and safety factors.

8Annexures and Figures

IS 4968 Part 1 (1976) - Key Annexures, Figures, and Specifications

The standard primarily covers the procedure and reporting for cone penetration tests (CPT). Key points and specifications include:

Key Reporting Requirements (Clause 5.1)

  • Number of blows (Ned) recorded every 300 mm penetration.
  • Data to be presented as a tubular statement or graph (Ned vs. depth).
  • Include:
    • Date of probing
    • Ground surface elevation
    • Water table depth and variation
    • Total resistance at levels
    • Interruptions and reasons
    • Soil type, if available
    • Diameter of cone used

Important Figures and Dimensions (Clause 8.5)

  • Cone and Cone Adopter dimensions are standardized (all in mm).
  • Refer to Fig. 1 for exact cone and adopter dimensions.

Typical Cone Dimensions (from Fig. 1)

PartDimension (mm)
Cone Diameter35
Cone Length60
Adopter Length100
Total Length160

Summary Diagram (Cone and Adopter)

graph LR
A[Cone] -->|35 mm dia, 60 mm length| B[Cone Adopter]
B -->|100 mm length| C[Assembly]

Note: For detailed tables and exact figure dimensions, refer directly to IS 4968 Part 1, Fig. 1.


This standard ensures uniformity in CPT data collection and reporting, crucial for soil investigation and foundation design.

Popular Questions About IS 4968 Part 1

?What are the specifications for the 50 mm cone and driving rod used in this test?

Specifications for 50 mm Cone and Driving Rod (IS 4968 Part 1):

  • Cone:

    • Diameter: 50 mm
    • Apex angle: 60°
    • Material: Hardened steel (for threaded, recoverable cone); mild steel (for expendable cone)
    • Threaded cone screws onto driving rod; expendable cone uses a cone adopter.
    • Cone tip is hardened.
  • Driving Rod (A Rod):

    • Connects to cone via threaded coupling or cone adopter.
    • Equipped with rod coupling at hammer end.
    • Length: Typically in sections, connected via couplings.
    • Must allow free passage through hammer hole with ~5 mm clearance.
  • Assembly:

    • Hammer weight: 65 kg
    • Hammer drop height: 750 mm
    • Guide rod length: 1500 mm
    • Hammer hole diameter allows rod and guide to pass freely.
  • Operation:

    • Cone driven vertically by hammer blows.
    • Blows counted per 100 mm penetration.
    • Stop if blows exceed 95 per 100 mm to avoid damage.
Loading diagram...

This ensures standardization and repeatability of the cone penetration test per IS 4968 Part 1.

?How deep can the cone be driven depending on soil type and water table conditions?

According to IS 4968 Part 1 (1976):

  • Maximum cone penetration depth depends on soil type and water table:

    • Cohesionless soils: Limit depth to 5 m if correlating cone values with other methods.
    • Mixed soils with binding material: Limit depth to 10 m.
    • For general qualitative stratification, cone may be driven to any convenient depth.
  • For a 62.5 mm cone driven dry (no bentonite slurry) in medium to fine sands, penetration depth can go up to 9 m (see IS 4968 Part II).

  • To avoid equipment damage, stop driving when blows exceed 95 per 100 mm penetration.

Summary Table:

Soil TypeMax Depth (m)Notes
Cohesionless soils5For correlation with other tests
Mixed soils (binding)10
Medium to fine sands9 (62.5 mm cone, dry)Per IS 4968 Part II
General qualitative testAny convenient depthNo strict limit

This ensures reliable data without damaging equipment or compromising test validity.

?What is the procedure for conducting the dynamic cone penetration test without bentonite slurry?

Procedure for Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) without Bentonite Slurry (IS 4968 Part 1):

  • Equipment: Use a 50 mm diameter cone attached to a driving rod.
  • Test Setup: No bentonite slurry is used; the cone is driven dry into the soil.
  • Driving Method: The cone is driven by a standard weight (usually 65 kg) falling from a fixed height (typically 0.75 m).
  • Penetration Measurement: Count the number of hammer blows required to drive the cone a fixed distance (usually 10 cm).
  • Depth Limit: Generally effective up to about 9 m depth for medium to fine sands.
  • Data Interpretation: Blow count per penetration depth is correlated with soil strength parameters.
  • Caution: For 62.5 mm cones or dry penetration, refer to IS 4968 Part II and apply empirical relationships cautiously.
Loading diagram...

This method provides a quick, cost-effective in-situ soil strength estimate without slurry complications.

?How should the number of hammer blows be recorded and reported?

According to IS 4968 Part 1 (Clauses 3.1 and related notes):

  • The number of hammer blows shall be recorded for every 100 mm penetration of the 50 mm diameter cone.
  • The hammer is a 65 kg weight dropped freely from 750 mm height.
  • Record the blows per 100 mm increment until the desired depth is reached.
  • Stop driving if blows exceed 95 per 100 mm to avoid equipment damage.
  • Report the number of blows clearly, following IS 2-1960 rounding rules.

Summary for recording and reporting:

ParameterDetails
Hammer weight + chain65 kg
Drop height750 mm
Penetration interval for blow countEvery 100 mm
Max blows per 100 mm (stop criteria)95 blows
ReportingNumber of blows per 100 mm, rounded per IS 2-1960

This ensures standardized and comparable test results across projects.

Loading diagram...
?What are the criteria for stopping the penetration during testing to avoid equipment damage?

According to IS 4968 Part 1 (Clause 3.1 Note), to prevent equipment damage during the cone penetration test:

  • Stop driving when the number of hammer blows exceeds 95 for every 100 mm penetration.

This threshold ensures the hammer and rod assembly are not overstressed by excessive resistance.

Summary:

ParameterValue
Hammer weight65 kg
Drop height750 mm
Cone diameter50 mm
Max blows per 100 mm penetration95 blows (stop driving)

This criterion balances test progress and equipment safety, especially in dense or hard soil layers.

Loading diagram...

This flow ensures safe operation during testing.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 4968 Part 1. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required