IS 2974 Part 31992AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Code of practice for design and construction of machine foun dations, Part 3: Foundations for rotary type machines (Medium and high frequency)

IS 2974 Part 3:1992 provides comprehensive guidelines for the design and construction of framed foundations for rotary type machines operating at medium to high frequencies, such as turbo-generators and turbo-compressors. It addresses vibration considerations, structural analysis, reinforcement detailing, and load cases including normal operation, abnormal events, and seismic forces. This standard is essential for civil, structural, and foundation engineers involved in heavy machinery installation to ensure stable, vibration-resistant foundations that maintain machine alignment and operational safety.

16Sections
74Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1992Edition
Soil and Foundation EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 2974 Part 3 PDF, IS 2974 Part 3 pdf free download, IS 2974 Part 3 free download pdf, IS2974Part3 PDF, IS-2974-Part-3 PDF, IS 2974 Part 3 1992 PDF, IS 2974 Part 3:1992 PDF, IS 2974 Part 3-1992 PDF, IS 2974 Part 3 (1992) PDF, IS 2974 Part 3 1992 edition PDF, IS 2974 Part 3 edition 1992 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 2974 Part 3:1992 provides comprehensive guidelines for the design and construction of framed foundations for rotary type machines operating at medium to high frequencies, such as turbo-generators and turbo-compressors. It addresses vibration considerations, structural analysis, reinforcement detailing, and load cases including normal operation, abnormal events, and seismic forces. This standard is essential for civil, structural, and foundation engineers involved in heavy machinery installation to ensure stable, vibration-resistant foundations that maintain machine alignment and operational safety.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Foundation Engineers
  • Structural Engineers
  • Civil Engineers
  • Machine Foundation Designers
  • Power Plant Engineers
  • Mechanical Engineers involved in machine installation
  • Consultants for heavy machinery foundations

Key Topics Covered

Design principles for framed foundations
Vibration analysis including free and forced vibration
Static and dynamic structural analysis methods
Load considerations: dead, operating, unbalance, thermal, short circuit, seismic
Reinforcement detailing and concrete grade specifications
Sizing and proportioning of base mats, top decks, beams, and columns
Isolation of foundations from adjoining structures
Use of three-dimensional space frame models for analysis
Construction joint requirements and concreting practices
Frequency criteria to avoid resonance
Abnormal load cases such as blade loss and short circuit forces
Geotechnical data requirements for foundation design

Table of Contents

1Scope

Scope & Key Specifications from IS 2974 Part 3 (Clause 6.1 & 314.16)

This part covers design data requirements and foundation specifications for turbo-generators and similar machines.

Machine Data Required (Clause 6.1)

The designer must obtain from the manufacturer:

  • Loading diagram: Location, magnitude, direction of all static & dynamic loads.
  • Speed: Operating and critical speeds.
  • Foundation outline dimensions.
  • Mass moment of inertia of machine components.
  • Details of inserts & embedments.
  • Piping/ducting layout and supports.
  • Operating temperatures at different zones.
  • Allowable displacements at bearing points.

Normal Unbalance Force on Turbo-Generator Foundation (Clause 314.16)

  • Operating speed, ( \omega = 3000 , \text{rpm} = 314.16 , \text{rad/s} )
  • Eccentricity, ( e = 0.02 , \text{mm} )
  • Unbalance force formula:

[ F = m e \omega^2 \sin(\omega t) ]

where:

  • ( m ) = mass of rotor,
  • ( e ) = eccentricity,
  • ( \omega ) = angular velocity.

Additional Notes

  • Foundation must be isolated from adjoining structures with an air gap to prevent vibration transmission.
  • Refer to Annex A for related Indian Standards.

flowchart LR
A[Machine Manufacturer] --> B[Provide Machine Data]
B --> C[Designer]
C --> D[Foundation Design]
D --> E[Isolation from Structures]

This ensures vibration control and foundation integrity per IS 2974 Part 3.

2Referenced Indian Standards

Referenced Indian Standards in IS 2974 (Part 3):1992 (Annex A, Clause 2.1)

IS No.Title
IS 432 (Part 1):1982Mild steel & medium tensile steel bars for concrete reinforcement (3rd revision)
IS 432 (Part 2):1982Hard-drawn steel wire for concrete reinforcement (3rd revision)
IS 456:1978Code of practice for plain & reinforced concrete (2nd revision)
IS 1786:1985High strength deformed steel bars & wires for concrete reinforcement
IS 1893:1984Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures (4th revision)
IS 2974 (Part 1):1982Design & construction of machine foundations: Part 1 (reciprocating machines)
IS 2974 (Part 2):1980Design & construction of machine foundations: Part 2 (impact type machines)

Key Formula for Normal Unbalance Force (Clause 314.16 & Annex C)

[ F = m e \omega^2 \sin(\omega t) ]

  • (m) = rotor mass (kg)
  • (e) = eccentricity of rotor mass (m), calculated as:

[ e = \frac{G}{\omega} ]

  • (G) = balance quality grade in mm/s (for design use G6.3)
  • (\omega = 2 \pi \times \text{rpm}/60) (rad/s)

Notes on Unbalance Force:

  • Turbo-generators are typically balanced to grade G2.5, but G6.3 is used for foundation design.
  • Example: For 3000 rpm, (\omega = 314.16 , \text{rad/s}), and (e = 0.02 , \text{mm}).

Summary

  • IS 2974 (Part 3) references key IS codes for materials, seismic design, and machine foundation practice.
  • Unbalance forces are critical for foundation design; use the provided formula when manufacturer data is unavailable.
  • For abnormal loads like
3Terminology

IS 2974 Part 3: Terminology - Key Points

  • Terminology Reference:
    Clause 3.0 defines common terms in structural dynamics and machine foundation design. For a detailed list, see IS 2974 Parts 1 & 2.

  • Nomenclature:
    Clause 4.0 specifies foundation component names (see Fig. 1):

    • Transverse beams
    • Longitudinal beams
    • Top deck (cast in one operation per Clause 12.8.2)
  • Typical Models and Diagrams:

    • Fig. 1: Framed foundation for turbo-generator
    • Fig. 2: Loading diagram
    • Fig. 3: Space frame model of foundation
  • Abnormal Loading (Annex B):

    • Loss of blade unbalance: Large dynamic forces at bearings during blade failure.
    • Short circuit force: Moment formula:
      [ M(t) = Ae^{-0.4t} \sin \omega t - Be^{-0.4t} \sin 2\omega t + Ce^{-0.15t} ]
      Where:
      • (\omega) = mains angular frequency
      • (A = 10 \times) normal power torque
      • (B = 5 \times) normal power torque
      • (C =) normal power torque
  • Normal Unbalance Force (Annex C):
    For balance quality grade (G) (mm/s), eccentricity (e) (mm) is:
    [ e = \frac{G}{\omega} ]
    where (\omega) = machine speed in rad/s. Use grade G6.3 for design (one grade higher than machine’s G2.5).

  • Referenced IS Codes (Annex A):

    • IS 2974 Parts 1 & 2 (machine foundations)
    • IS 456 (plain & reinforced concrete)
    • IS 1893 (earthquake design)
    • IS 432 Parts 1 & 2 (steel reinforcement)

Summary Diagram of Foundation Components (Fig. 1)

graph LR
  TD[Top Deck]
  TB[Transverse Beam]
  LB[Longitud
4Nomenclature of Foundation Components

IS 2974 Part 3 – Nomenclature of Foundation Components (Clause 4.0)

This clause defines standard names for foundation parts, ensuring uniformity in design and communication.

Key Components (per Fig. 1 in the code):

  • Deck: Top slab or plate supporting the machine.
  • Columns: Vertical members transferring loads from deck to mat.
  • Mat/Foundation Base: The large base slab distributing loads to soil.
  • Isolation Gap: Air gap between foundation and adjoining structures to prevent vibration transfer.

Important Specifications:

  • The entire structure includes deck, columns, and mat (Clause 4.6).
  • Isolation from adjoining structures must be ensured by an air gap at all levels above the base mat (Clause 5).

Typical Nomenclature Table (simplified):

ComponentDescription
DeckTop surface supporting the machine
ColumnVertical support member
Mat/FoundationBase slab distributing loads
Isolation GapAir gap preventing vibration transfer

Vibration Mode (Clause 3.6):

  • A mode of vibration is a characteristic harmonic motion pattern with a specific frequency.
  • Multiple modes can exist simultaneously in multi-degree systems.
graph TD
    Deck --> Column
    Column --> Mat
    Mat --> Soil
    Foundation -. Isolation Gap .-> Adjacent Structure

This schematic shows load transfer and isolation gap for vibration control.

For detailed terms, refer also to IS 2974 Parts 1 & 2.

5Isolation from Adjoining Structures

Isolation from Adjoining Structures (IS 2974 Part 3: Clause 5)

  • Requirement: The foundation (deck, columns, mat) must be isolated from the main building and other plant structures.
  • Method: Provide an air gap at all levels above the base mat to prevent vibration transfer.
  • Purpose: Avoid dynamic interaction and resonance between the machine foundation and adjoining structures.

Key Specifications:

ParameterDetails
Air GapMust be continuous and sufficient to prevent contact under all conditions
Levels of IsolationAll levels above the base mat (deck, columns)
ConstructionThe top deck must be cast in a single uninterrupted operation (Clause 12.8.2)

Additional Notes:

  • Foundation should be designed so that the resultant load passes through the center of gravity of the base mat contact area (Clause 8.6).
  • Small eccentricities allowed: up to 3% of base dimension.
  • Dynamic forces like short-circuit torque or blade loss unbalance should be considered separately (Annex B).

Summary Diagram of Isolation Concept

graph LR
  A[Main Building] ---|Air Gap| B[Foundation Structure]
  B --> C[Deck]
  C --> D[Columns]
  D --> E[Base Mat]
  style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
  style B fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
  style C fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
  style D fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
  style E fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

References:

  • IS 2974 Part 3, Clause 5
  • Clause 12.8.2 (Construction joints)
  • Clause 8.6 (Load eccentricity)
6Necessary Data

IS 2974 Part 3: Necessary Data for Machine Foundation Design

1. Machine Data (Clause 6.1)

The machine manufacturer must provide:

  • Loading diagram: Location, magnitude & direction of all loads (including dynamic).
  • Speed & critical speeds of the machine.
  • Outline dimensions of the foundation.
  • Mass moment of inertia of machine components.
  • Details of inserts and embedments.
  • Layout of piping/ducting and support details.
  • Operating temperatures in various zones.
  • Allowable displacements at bearing points.

2. Geotechnical Data (Clause 6.2)

Site investigation must provide:

  • Allowable bearing pressure or pile capacities.
  • Dynamic soil properties as per IS 5249:1992.

3. Loading on Foundation (Clause 7)

Consider the following loads:

Load TypeDescription
Dead loadsSelf-weight + machine dead weight
Operation loadsFriction, torque, thermal elongation, vacuum, piping forces
Unbalance forcesDuring normal operation
Temperature forcesUniform & gradient temperature effects
Short circuit breaker loadElectrical fault conditions
Blade unbalance/bearing failureWorst-case dynamic loads
Seismic forcesEarthquake-induced forces
Erection loadsTemporary construction loads

4. Isolation (Clause 5)

  • Provide air gap isolation between foundation and adjoining structures to avoid vibration transmission.

Summary Table: Key Data for Designer

Data TypeSourcePurpose
Machine loadsManufacturerDesign load application
Machine speedsManufacturerDynamic analysis
Foundation outlineManufacturerLayout & sizing
Soil propertiesGeotechnical reportBearing capacity & dynamic response
Load combinationsIS 2974 Annex BComprehensive load design

flowchart TD
    A[Machine Manufacturer Data] --> B[Foundation Designer]
    C[Geotechnical Investigation] --> B
    B --> D[Foundation Design]
    E[Load Types (Dead, Dynamic, Thermal, Seismic)] --> B
    F[
7Loading on the Foundation

Loading on Foundation (IS 2974 Part 3)

Key Loads to Consider (Clause 7):

  • Dead Loads (DL): Self-weight of foundation + machine weight
  • Operation Loads (OL): Friction, torque, thermal elongation, vacuum, piping forces
  • Unbalance Loads (NUL): During normal operation
  • Temperature Loads (TLF): Uniform & gradient temperature effects
  • Short Circuit Forces (SCF)
  • Loss of Blade / Bearing Failure Loads (LBL/BFL)
  • Seismic Loads (EQL)
  • Erection Loads

Load Combinations (Clause 9.5.2):

ConditionLoad Combination
OperatingDL + OL + NUL + TLF
Short CircuitDL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF
Loss of Blade/BearingDL + OL + TLF + LBL/BFL
SeismicDL + OL + NUL + TLF + EQL

Foundation Sizing (Clause 8.6):

  • Resultant force from all weights should pass through the center of gravity of the base area.
  • Allowable eccentricity up to 3% of the base dimension along the displacement axis.

Soil-Structure Interaction (Clause 10):

  • Ignored for steady dynamic/static loads.
  • Considered for seismic zones.

Modeling (Clause 11):

  • Base mat modeled as plate bending elements or grillage beams.
  • Soil/piles idealized as spring elements.

flowchart TD
    A[Loads on Foundation] --> B[Dead Loads (DL)]
    A --> C[Operation Loads (OL)]
    A --> D[Unbalance Loads (NUL)]
    A --> E[Temperature Loads (TLF)]
    A --> F[Short Circuit Forces (SCF)]
    A --> G[Loss of Blade/Bearing Loads (LBL/BFL)]
    A --> H[Seismic Loads (EQL)]
    A --> I[Erection Loads]

    subgraph Load Combinations
        J[Operating] --> K[DL + OL + NUL + TLF]
        L[Short Circuit] --> M[DL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF]
8Sizing of the Foundation

IS 2974 Part 3: Sizing of Foundation – Key Points

1. Geotechnical Data (Clause 6.2)

  • Determine allowable bearing pressure or pile capacities from site investigation.
  • Obtain dynamic soil properties as per IS 5249:1992.

2. Loads to Consider (Clause 7)

  • Dead loads (foundation + machine weight)
  • Operational loads (friction, torque, thermal forces, vacuum, piping)
  • Unbalance forces during operation
  • Temperature effects (uniform & gradient)
  • Short circuit and failure loads
  • Seismic forces
  • Erection loads

3. Foundation Sizing (Clause 8.6)

  • Dimension foundation so resultant force passes through centre of gravity of base area.
  • Allow eccentricity up to 3% of base dimension if unavoidable.
  • Include weights of machine, deck, slabs, base mat, columns.

4. Isolation (Clause 5)

  • Provide air gap between foundation and adjoining structures to avoid vibration transfer.

Typical Formula for Bearing Pressure:

[ q_{all} = \frac{P}{A} \leq q_{allow} ]

Where:

  • (P) = Total vertical load (including machine + foundation)
  • (A) = Base area of foundation
  • (q_{allow}) = Allowable soil bearing pressure

Summary Table: Foundation Design Parameters

ParameterSource/ReferenceNotes
Allowable Bearing PressureSite InvestigationPer Clause 6.2
LoadsClause 7Dead, operational, seismic etc.
Eccentricity LimitClause 8.6Max 3% of base dimension
Isolation GapClause 5Air gap to avoid vibration

flowchart TD
    A[Site Investigation] --> B[Determine Soil Parameters]
    B --> C[Calculate Allowable Bearing Pressure]
    D[Load Assessment] --> E[Sum of Loads]
    C & E --> F[Foundation Sizing]
    F --> G[Check Eccentricity ≤ 3%]
    F --> H[Design Base Area]
    H --> I[Provide Isolation Gap]

**

9Structural Analysis

IS 2974 Part 3: Structural Analysis Key Points

1. Modeling (Clause 9.1.1)

  • Model foundation as a 3D space frame: columns/beams as 3D beam elements (6 DOF/node).
  • Slabs/walls: thin shell (plate bending) elements.
  • Columns fixed at base (ignore base mat flexibility).
  • Nodes at bearing points, beam-column junctions, mid/quarter points.
  • Use lumped-mass approach (machine + foundation mass lumped).
  • Use uncracked sections for moment of inertia; consider shear rigidity.
  • Young's Modulus (E):
    • Static: (E = 5700 \sqrt{f_{ck}}) (IS 456:1978)
    • Dynamic (N/mm²):
GradeDynamic Elastic Modulus (N/mm²)
M2025,590 - 30,000
M2528,500 - 34,000
M3031,200 - 37,000
  • Damping: 2% critical (normal), 5% (emergency loads).

2. Load Combinations (Clause 9.5.2)

ConditionLoad Combination
OperatingDL + OL + NUL + TLF
Short CircuitDL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF
Blade/Bearing FailureDL + OL + TLF + LBL/BFL
SeismicDL + OL + NUL + TLF + EQL
  • DL: Dead Load, OL: Operating Load, NUL: No-Load, TLF: Thermal Load Factor, SCF: Short Circuit Factor, LBL/BFL: Blade/Bearing Failure Load, EQL: Earthquake Load.

3. Base Mat Analysis (Clause 11)

  • Model base mat as plate bending elements or grillage of beams.
  • Soil/piles idealized as spring elements.
  • Foundation assumed fixed at base raft level for static analysis.

4. Foundation Dimensioning (Clause 8.6)

  • Resultant force from machine
10Frequency Criteria

IS 2974 Part 3: Frequency Criteria for Machine Foundations

Key Frequency Criteria (Clause 9.2.1 & 9.2)

  • Fundamental natural frequency (fn) must be at least 20% away from the machine operating speed (fm):

    [ f_n < 0.8 f_m \quad \text{or} \quad f_n > 1.2 f_m ]

  • Preferably, maintain a 50% frequency separation for safety:

    [ |f_n - f_m| \geq 0.5 f_m ]

  • The highest natural frequency should be at least 10% higher than the operating frequency:

    [ f_{max} \geq 1.1 f_m ]

Forced Vibration Analysis (Clause 9.3)

  • Perform forced vibration analysis at:

    • Operating speed (f_m)
    • Frequencies of selected modes (for transient resonance)
  • Check calculated displacements against allowable limits.

Definitions (Clause 1.2)

  • (f_n): Fundamental natural frequency of foundation (Hz)
  • (f_m): Operating speed of the machine (Hz)

Summary Table

ParameterCriteria
Fundamental frequency (f_n)(f_n < 0.8 f_m) or (f_n > 1.2 f_m)
Preferred frequency gap(\geq 0.5 f_m)
Highest natural frequency(\geq 1.1 f_m)
flowchart LR
    A[Machine Operating Frequency \(f_m\)] --> B[Check \(f_n\)]
    B -->|If \(f_n < 0.8 f_m\) or \(f_n > 1.2 f_m\)| C[Frequency Criteria Met]
    B -->|Else| D[Adjust Foundation Design]
    C --> E[Perform Forced Vibration Analysis]
    E --> F[Check Displacements]
    F -->|Within Limits| G[Design Approved]
    F -->|Exceeds Limits| D

This ensures the foundation avoids resonance and excessive vibrations.

11Bearing Pressure and Pile Load

IS 2974 Part 3: Key Points on Bearing Pressure & Pile Load

Bearing Pressure (Clause 11.1)

  • Maximum bearing pressure on soil ≤ 80% of net allowable bearing pressure.
  • For piles, load on the heaviest loaded pile ≤ 80% of safe pile load capacity.

Geotechnical Data (Clause 6.2)

  • Site investigation must determine:
    • Allowable bearing pressure.
    • Pile capacities.
    • Dynamic soil properties (per IS 5249:1992).

Load Combinations (Clause 9.5.2)

  • Operating: DL + OL + NUL + TLF
  • Short circuit: DL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF
  • Bearing failure: DL + OL + TLF + LBL/BFL
  • Seismic: DL + OL + NUL + TLF + EQL

Foundation Sizing & Design

  • Resultant load should ideally pass through base mat’s centroid (Clause 8.6).
  • Allow eccentricity ≤ 3% of base dimension.

Typical Formula for Safe Bearing Pressure:

[ q_{safe} = \frac{Q_{ultimate}}{F.S.} ]

Where:

  • ( Q_{ultimate} ) = ultimate bearing capacity from soil tests.
  • ( F.S. ) = factor of safety (usually 2.5 to 3).

Pile Load Capacity

[ Q_{safe} = Q_{allowable} \times 0.8 ]

Where:

  • ( Q_{allowable} ) = pile load capacity from geotechnical investigation.

Soil-Structure Interaction (Clause 10)

  • Ignored for static and steady dynamic loads.
  • Considered for seismic zones.

flowchart TD
    A[Site Investigation]
    B[Determine Allowable Bearing Pressure & Pile Capacity]
    C[Calculate Load Combinations]
    D[Check Bearing Pressure ≤ 0.8 × Allowable]
    E[Check Pile Load ≤ 0.8 × Safe Capacity]
    F[Design Foundation Dimensions]
    G[Model Soil-Structure Interaction (Seismic only)]

    A --> B --> C --> D
    D --> E --> F --> G

This ensures safe design respecting IS 2974 Part 3 requirements.

12Materials and Reinforcement Detailing

IS 2974 Part 3: Key Formulas & Specifications for Materials and Reinforcement Detailing


1. Reinforcement Detailing (Clause 12.7)

  • Clear spacing between bars ≥ (Largest aggregate size + Largest bar diameter) + 5 mm
    Ensures ease of concreting and proper compaction.

2. Minimum Reinforcement (Clause 12.5.3, Table 12.5.3)

ElementReinforcement % of Gross Sectional Area
Beams (Top Deck)Top and Bottom: 0.25% each
Sides: 0.1% each side
ColumnsLongitudinal: 0.8%
Raft FoundationTop and Bottom: 0.12% each direction
Intermediate Layer (if thickness > 2 m): 0.06% shrinkage reinforcement each direction

3. Concrete Cover (Clause 12.6)

  • Top deck and columns: Minimum 50 mm clear cover
  • Base mat: Minimum 100 mm clear cover

Summary Table:

ParameterValue
Min clear spacingAggregate size + bar diameter + 5 mm
Min reinforcement (beams)0.25% top & bottom, 0.1% sides
Min reinforcement (columns)0.8% longitudinal
Min reinforcement (raft)0.12% top & bottom, 0.06% shrinkage if >2m thick
Concrete cover (top deck/columns)50 mm
Concrete cover (base mat)100 mm

flowchart TD
    A[Reinforcement Detailing] --> B[Clear Spacing ≥ Aggregate + Bar Dia + 5mm]
    A --> C[Minimum Reinforcement %]
    C --> D[Beams: 0.25% top/bottom, 0.1% sides]
    C --> E[Columns: 0.8% longitudinal]
    C --> F[Raft: 0.12% top/bottom, 0.06% shrinkage
13Construction Joints and Practices

IS 2974 Part 3: Construction Joints and Practices (Clause 12.8)

  • Base Mat Casting:

    • Must be cast in a single uninterrupted operation to ensure monolithic behavior.
  • Construction Joints Locations:

    • Between base mat and columns.
    • Between columns and top deck.
    • At mid-height of columns if column length > 8 m.
  • Isolation from Adjoining Structures:

    • Provide an air gap at all levels above the base mat to prevent vibration transfer.
  • Reinforcement Detailing (Clause 12.7):

    • Clear spacing between bars ≥ (aggregate size + largest bar diameter + 5 mm).

Summary Table: Construction Joint Guidelines

ParameterSpecification
Base mat castingSingle uninterrupted pour
Joint locationsBase mat-columns, columns-top deck, mid-column (>8 m height)
Air gap for isolationProvided at all levels above base mat
Minimum bar clear spacingAggregate size + largest bar diameter + 5 mm

flowchart TD
    A[Base Mat] -->|Construction Joint| B[Columns]
    B -->|Construction Joint| C[Top Deck]
    B -->|Mid-height Joint (if >8m)| D[Column Mid-section]
    A -. Air Gap .-> E[Adjoining Structures]

This ensures structural integrity, vibration isolation, and ease of concreting per IS 2974 Part 3.

Annex AList of Referred Indian Standards

List of Referred Indian Standards (IS 2974 Part 3 - Annex A)

IS No.Title
IS 432 (Part 1):1982Mild steel and medium tensile steel bars for concrete reinforcement (3rd revision)
IS 432 (Part 2):1982Hard-drawn steel wire for concrete reinforcement (3rd revision)
IS 456:1978Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete (2nd revision)
IS 1786:1985High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
IS 1893:1984Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures (4th revision)
IS 2974 (Part 1):1982Code of practice for machine foundations: Part 1 - Reciprocating type machines
IS 2974 (Part 2):1980Code of practice for machine foundations: Part 2 - Impact type machines (hammer foundations)

Key Formula for Normal Unbalance Force (Annex C)

[ \text{Unbalance force} = m e \omega^2 \sin(\omega t) ]

Where:

  • (m) = rotor mass (kg)
  • (e) = eccentricity of rotating mass (mm)
  • (\omega) = angular speed in rad/s
  • (t) = time (s)

Eccentricity (e) from balance quality grade (G):

[ e = \frac{G}{\omega} \quad \text{(in mm)} ]

  • (G) = balance quality grade (mm/s), e.g., for foundation design use (G=6.3) (one grade higher than machine grade G2.5)
  • (\omega = 2 \pi N / 60), where (N) = rpm

Notes:

  • Refer to IS 2974 Parts 1 & 2 for detailed machine foundation design.
  • For abnormal loads like blade loss or short circuit, use vendor data or Annex B formulas.
  • IS 1893 is essential for seismic design considerations.

flowchart LR
    A[IS
Annex BAbnormal Loading

IS 2974 (Part 3): Abnormal Loading Key Points

1. Abnormal Loads Considered (Clause 9.5.1 & Annex B):

  • Loss of Blade Unbalance (LBL):

    • Occurs if turbine blades break, causing large dynamic forces at bearings.
    • Forces supplied by manufacturer or checked for strength during coasting down.
  • Short Circuit Force (SCF):

    • Huge torque at generator terminals during short circuit.
    • Moment formula:
      [ M(t) = A e^{-V0.4} \sin \omega t - B e^{-V0.4} \sin 2\omega t + C e^{-0.15} ]
    • Where:
      • (\omega) = mains angular frequency
      • (A, B, C) = machine-specific coefficients (if unknown, use:
        (A = 10 \times) normal power torque,
        (B = 5 \times) normal power torque,
        (C =) normal power torque)
  • Normal Unbalance Force (Annex C):

    • For balance quality grade (G) (mm/sec), eccentricity (e) (mm), and speed (\omega) (rad/sec):
      [ e = \frac{G}{\omega} ]
    • Use grade (G = 6.3) mm/sec for foundation design (one grade higher than machine G2.5).

2. Load Combinations (Clause 9.5.2):

ConditionLoads Included
OperatingDL + OL + NUL + TLF
Short CircuitDL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF
Loss of Blade/Bearing FailDL + OL + TLF + LBL/BFL
SeismicDL + OL + NUL + TLF + EQL

3. Definitions:

  • DL = Dead Load
  • OL = Operating Load
  • NUL = Normal Unbalance Load
  • TLF = Temperature Load on Foundation
  • SCF = Short Circuit Force
  • LBL/BFL = Loss of Blade Load / Bearing Failure Load
Annex CNormal Unbalance Force on Turbo-Generator Foundation

Normal Unbalance Force on Turbo-Generator Foundation (IS 2974 Part 3:1992)

Key Formula (Annex C, Clause 9.3.1)

When manufacturer data is unavailable, unbalance force can be estimated as:

[ F(t) = m e \omega^2 \sin(\omega t) ]

Where:

  • ( m ) = mass of rotor (kg)
  • ( e ) = eccentricity of rotor mass (mm)
  • ( \omega ) = angular speed (rad/s)
  • ( F(t) ) = unbalance force at time ( t ) (N)

Eccentricity Calculation from Balance Quality Grade ( G ):

[ G = e \omega ]

  • ( G ) = balance quality grade in mm/s (For turbo-generators, use ( G = 6.3 ) mm/s for design, one grade higher than G2.5)
  • ( e = \frac{G}{\omega} )

Example for 3000 rpm (Clause 314.16):

  • ( \omega = 314.16 , \text{rad/s} )
  • ( e = \frac{6.3}{314.16} = 0.02 , \text{mm} )

Summary Table:

ParameterValue / Formula
Rotor speed ( N )3000 rpm
Angular speed ( \omega )( 2\pi N/60 = 314.16 , \text{rad/s} )
Balance quality grade ( G )6.3 mm/s (design)
Eccentricity ( e )( e = G/\omega = 0.02 , \text{mm} )
Unbalance force ( F(t) )( m e \omega^2 \sin(\omega t) )

Notes:

  • Use sinusoidal forcing function for dynamic analysis.
  • Always verify with machine manufacturer data if available.
  • This force acts at bearing locations and is critical for foundation design.
graph LR
A[Balance Quality Grade G (mm/s)] --> B[Eccentricity e = G/ω (mm)]

Popular Questions About IS 2974 Part 3

?What types of machines does IS 2974 Part 3 apply to?

IS 2974 Part 3 applies specifically to foundations for rotary type machines operating at medium and high frequencies.

Types of Machines Covered:

  • Steam turbo-generators
  • Turbo-compressors
  • Blowers

Key Points:

  • Focuses on foundations for rotary machines with medium to high frequency vibrations.
  • Addresses design principles for frame foundations.
  • Considers vibration characteristics critical for these heavy rotary machines.
  • Suitable for large machines with capacities up to 500 MW (e.g., turbo-generators).
  • Emphasizes coordinated design involving structural, mechanical, and commissioning aspects.

Related Parts of IS 2974:

PartMachine TypeFrequency Type
Part 1Reciprocating type machinesN/A
Part 2Impact type machines (hammer)N/A
Part 3Rotary type machinesMedium & High frequency
Part 4Rotary type machinesLow frequency
Part 5Impact type machines (other than hammer)N/A

This part is essential for engineers designing foundations for high-speed rotary equipment where vibration control and structural integrity are critical.

?How does the standard address vibration and resonance in machine foundations?

IS 2974 Part 3 addresses vibration and resonance in machine foundations primarily through dynamic analysis and free vibration study:

  • Free Vibration Analysis (Clause 9.2):

    • Calculate natural frequencies and mode shapes of the foundation.
    • The highest natural frequency must be ≥ 10% higher than the machine's operating frequency to avoid resonance.
    • Damping is neglected in this step.
  • Dynamic Modelling (Clause 9.1 & 9.1.1):

    • Use a 3D space frame model for large turbo-generator foundations (>100 MW).
    • Smaller foundations may use plane frame models.
    • Model includes mass, stiffness, and damping; machine and foundation masses lumped together.
    • Columns fixed at base; shear rigidity considered; rotational inertia disregarded.
    • Damping assumed as 2% of critical damping for normal operation, 5% for emergency loads.
  • Material Properties:

    • Use dynamic elastic modulus values per concrete grade for accurate stiffness.

Summary Table: Dynamic Elastic Modulus (N/mm²)

GradeRange
M2025,590 - 30,000
M2528,500 - 34,000
M3031,200 - 37,000

Key Design Criterion to Prevent Resonance:

[ f_{natural} \geq 1.1 \times f_{operating} ]

Where:

  • ( f_{natural} ) = natural frequency of foundation
  • ( f_{operating} ) = machine operating frequency

Loading diagram...

This ensures foundation vibration does not amplify machine vibrations, preventing resonance failures.

?What are the recommended materials and reinforcement specifications?

IS 2974 Part 3: Recommended Materials & Reinforcement Specifications

Materials (Clause 12.5.1)

  • Use Mild Steel Bars conforming to IS 432 (Parts 1 & 2): 1982
  • Or High Yield Strength Deformed Bars conforming to IS 1786: 1985

Reinforcement Detailing (Clause 12.7)

  • Maintain clear spacing between bars ≥ (5 mm + aggregate size + largest bar diameter)
  • Ensures ease of concreting and proper compaction

Minimum Reinforcement (Clause 12.5.3)

ElementReinforcement % of Gross Sectional Area
Beams (top deck)Top & Bottom: 0.25% each
Beam Sides0.1% each side
ColumnsLongitudinal: 0.8%
Raft (top & bottom)0.12% each direction
Raft (intermediate layer)Shrinkage reinforcement: 0.06% each direction if thickness > 2 m

Summary Diagram

Loading diagram...

Note: Always verify bar diameters and aggregate size to maintain proper spacing and avoid congestion during concreting.

?How should abnormal loads like blade loss and short circuit forces be considered?

Consideration of Abnormal Loads (Blade Loss & Short Circuit Forces) per IS 2974 Part 3

  • Load Combinations (Clause 9.5.2):

    • Blade loss / bearing failure: DL + OL + TLF + LBL/BFL
    • Short circuit: DL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF
  • Permissible Stress Increase (Clause 12.2):
    When abnormal loads (earthquake, short circuit, blade loss) combine with dead/permanent loads, allow a 25% increase in permissible stresses per IS 456:1978.

  • Blade Loss (Annex B-1):

    • Sudden blade loss causes large dynamic forces at bearings.
    • Forces are usually provided by the manufacturer.
    • Check foundation strength for these short-duration forces (machine trips immediately).
  • Short Circuit Force (Annex B-2):

    • Causes large torque on foundation, modeled as:
      [ M(t) = A e^{-0.4 t} \sin \omega t - B e^{-0.4 t} \sin 2 \omega t + C e^{-0.15 t} ]
    • (A, B, C) are machine-specific coefficients; if unknown:
      [ A = 10 \times \text{normal power torque}, \quad B = 5 \times \text{normal power torque}, \quad C = \text{normal power torque} ]
    • Dynamic analysis is recommended; otherwise, use equivalent static forces cautiously.

Summary Table for Abnormal Loads

Load TypeLoad CombinationStress IncreaseNotes
Blade Loss (LBL)DL + OL + TLF + LBL/BFL+25%Short duration, strength check
Short Circuit (SCF)DL + OL + NUL + TLF + SCF+25%Dynamic torque, use vendor data

Loading diagram...
?What modeling techniques are suggested for dynamic analysis of foundations?

Dynamic Analysis Modeling Techniques (IS 2974 Part 3, Clause 9.1 & 9.1.1):

  • For >100 MW turbo-generator foundations:

    • Use a 3D space frame model.
    • Model columns/beams as 3D beam elements with 6 DOF per node.
    • Slabs/walls as thin shell (plate bending) elements.
    • Columns fixed at base (ignore base mat flexibility).
    • Include mass, stiffness, and damping characteristics.
    • Nodes at bearing points, beam-column junctions, mid/quarter points, and section changes.
    • Lumped-mass approach combining machine and foundation mass.
    • Use uncracked section properties; consider shear rigidity; ignore rotational inertia.
    • Dynamic Elastic Modulus varies by concrete grade (see table below).
    • Damping: 2% critical (normal), 5% critical (emergency).
  • For <100 MW with regular framing:

    • Use plane frame models in transverse and longitudinal directions.
  • Soil-structure interaction:

    • Ignored for steady-state dynamic loads.
    • Considered for seismic analysis in high seismic zones.

Dynamic Elastic Modulus (N/mm²)

Grade of ConcreteDynamic Elastic Modulus Range
M2025,590 – 30,000
M2528,500 – 34,000
M3031,200 – 37,000

Modeling Summary Diagram

Loading diagram...

This approach ensures accurate simulation of vibration characteristics for turbo-generator foundations.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 2974 Part 3. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required