IS 2974 Part 2 (1980) provides the code of practice for the design and construction of foundations specifically for impact type machines, such as hammer foundations. It addresses the unique challenges posed by repeated impact loads and vibrations, guiding engineers on foundation mass, dimensions, materials, and vibration analysis to ensure structural stability and operational safety. This standard is essential for civil and foundation engineers involved in installing heavy forging and hammer machinery.
Overview
IS 2974 Part 2 (1980) provides the code of practice for the design and construction of foundations specifically for impact type machines, such as hammer foundations. It addresses the unique challenges posed by repeated impact loads and vibrations, guiding engineers on foundation mass, dimensions, materials, and vibration analysis to ensure structural stability and operational safety. This standard is essential for civil and foundation engineers involved in installing heavy forging and hammer machinery.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Scope and Key Parameters - IS 2974 (Part 2) - 1980
This part covers dynamic load testing of pile foundations using a two-mass system model (tup + anvil + foundation block).
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Mass of tup | W1 | kg |
| Mass of anvil | Wa | kg |
| Mass of frame | Wb | kg |
| Height of fall of tup | h | cm |
| Frequency of impact | N | blows/min |
| Area of piston | A | cm² |
| Area of anvil base | Ab | cm² |
| Thickness of pad | t | cm (e.g., 41 cm) |
| Elastic modulus of pad | Ep | kg/cm² |
| Mass of foundation block | Wf | kg (e.g., 15 kg) |
| Area of foundation block | Ab | cm² |
| Equivalent radius of foundation | r | cm |
| Dynamic shear modulus of soil | G | kg/cm² |
| Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soil | Cu | kg/cm³ |
| Spring coefficient of pile foundation | Kp | kg/cm |
| Elastic modulus of pile material | Ep | kg/cm² |
| Cross-sectional area of pile | Ap | cm² |
| Length of pile | L | cm |
If resilient pad used:
If springs/dampers used:
graph LR
Tup(W1)
IS 2974 Part 2 - Definitions and Key Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass of tup | W₁ | kg | Mass of the drop weight (tup) |
| Mass of anvil | Wₐ | kg | Mass of the anvil |
| Mass of frame | W_f | kg | Mass of the frame attached to anvil/foundation |
| Height of fall of tup | h | cm | Drop height of tup |
| Frequency of impact | N | blows/min | Number of impacts per minute |
| Area of piston | A_p | cm² | Cross-sectional area of piston |
| Area of anvil base | A_a | cm² | Contact area of anvil base |
| Elastic modulus of pad | E_p | kg/cm² | Modulus of elasticity of cushioning pad |
| Thickness of pad | t_p | cm | Thickness of cushioning pad |
| Mass of foundation block | W_b | kg | Mass of foundation block |
| Area of foundation block | A_b | cm² | Contact area of foundation block |
| Equivalent radius of base | r | cm | Radius for equivalent circular base |
| Dynamic shear modulus of soil | G | kg/cm² | Soil's dynamic shear modulus |
| Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soil | C_u | kg/cm³ | Soil compression coefficient |
| Spring coefficient of pile foundation | K_p | kg/cm | Spring stiffness of pile foundation |
| Elastic modulus of pile material | E_pile | kg/cm² | Modulus of elasticity of pile material |
| Cross-sectional area of pile | A_pile | cm² | Cross-section of pile |
| Length of pile | L_pile | cm | Length of pile |
IS 2974 Part 2 - Necessary Data & Key Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Mass of tup | W₁ | kg |
| Mass of anvil | W₂ | kg |
| Mass of frame | Wf | kg |
| Height of fall of tup | h | cm |
| Frequency of impact | N | blows/min |
| Area of piston | Ap | cm² |
| Area of anvil base | Ab | cm² |
| Thickness of pad | t | cm |
| Elastic modulus of pad | Ep | kg/cm² |
| Mass of foundation block | Wb | kg |
| Equivalent radius of foundation | r | cm |
| Dynamic shear modulus of soil | G | kg/cm² |
| Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soil | Cu | kg/cm³ |
| Spring coefficient of pile foundation | Kp | kg/cm |
| Elastic modulus of pile material | Ep | kg/cm² |
| Cross-sectional area of pile | Ap | cm² |
| Length of pile | L | cm |
Total mass for dynamic analysis:
[ W = W_a + W_b + W_f \quad \text{(depending on frame attachment)} ]
Energy of Impact:
[ E = W_1 \times g \times h ]
Where:
IS 2974 Part 2 - Design Criteria for Hammer Foundations
Resilient Pad:
Springs & Dampers:
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Mass of tup | ( W_1 ) | kg |
| Mass of anvil | ( W_a ) | kg |
| Mass of frame | ( W_f ) | kg |
| Height of fall | ( h ) | cm |
| Frequency of impact | ( N ) | blows/min |
| Elastic modulus of pad | ( E_p ) | kg/cm² |
| Thickness of pad | ( t_p ) | cm |
| Mass of foundation block | ( W_b ) | kg |
| Area of foundation block | ( A_b ) | cm² |
| Equivalent radius of base | ( r ) | cm |
| Dynamic shear modulus of soil | ( G ) | kg/cm² |
| Spring coefficient of pile foundation | ( K_p ) | kg/cm |
[ f_n = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{K}{M}} ]
IS 2974 Part 2: Vibration Analysis Key Points
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Mass of tup | ( m_t ) | kg |
| Mass of anvil | ( m_a ) | kg |
| Mass of foundation block | ( W_b ) | kg |
| Height of fall of tup | ( h ) | cm |
| Frequency of impact | ( N ) | blows/min |
| Elastic modulus of pad | ( E_p ) | kg/cm² |
| Thickness of pad | ( t_p ) | cm |
| Dynamic shear modulus of soil | ( G ) | kg/cm² |
| Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soil | ( C |
IS 2974 (Part 2) - Key Construction Formulas & Specifications
Loading intensity on pad:
[
\sigma_1 = K_1 \cdot \delta_1 \cdot A \quad \text{(kg/cm}^2\text{)}
]
where ( K_1 ) is a constant, (\delta_1) is pad deflection.
Soil loading intensity:
[
\sigma_2 = \frac{W_a - W_b + W_e + k_2 L_b - A_b}{2 \pi r f_{nb} V_{bs}} \times (1 + k)
]
Must be less than allowable soil bearing pressure.
Maximum deflection of foundation (single impact):
[
\delta = \frac{2 w f_{nb} V'}{1 + W_a + W_b + W_3}
]
(V') = velocity after impact, (f_{nb}) = natural frequency (Hz).
If resilient pad used:
If springs/dampers used:
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | |----------------------------------|--------
Vibration Analysis of Two-Mass System (IS 2974 Part 2)
Natural frequencies (fn1, fn2):
The two natural frequencies are roots of:
[
f^2 - (f_{na}^2 + f_{nb}^2)(1+B)f + (1+B)f_{na}^2 f_{nb}^2 = 0
]
where ( B = \frac{m_2}{m_1} ), ( f_{na} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_1}{m_1}} ), ( f_{nb} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_2}{m_2}} ).
Amplitude of vibrations:
[
x_1 = \frac{(f_{na}^2 - f^2)}{(f^2 - f_{na}^2)(f^2 - f_{nb}^2)} V_1, \quad x_2 = \frac{2m (f_{na}^2 - f_{nb}^2) f_{na}}{(f_{na}^2 - f_{nb}^2)} V_1
]
Velocity (V_1) is calculated from the momentum equation of the hammer impact.
Masses:
Springs:
Frequently Asked
According to IS 2974 Part 2, Clause 4.4.3:
| Soil Condition | Foundation Block Mass (Wb) Relative to Anvil Mass (Wa) |
|---|---|
| General | ≥ 3 × Wa |
| Stiff clays / Compact sandy deposits | 4 to 5 × Wa |
| Moderately firm to soft clays / Loose sands | 5 to 6 × Wa |
This ensures stability against vibrations and dynamic forces from the hammer operation.
Minimum foundation block thickness depends on tup mass (for design safety):
| Tup Mass (tonnes) | Min Foundation Block Thickness (m) |
|---|---|
| Up to 1.0 | 1.00 |
| 1.0 to 2.0 | 1.25 |
| 2.0 to 4.0 | 1.75 |
| 4.0 to 6.0 | 2.25 |
| Over 6.0 | 2.50 |
This mass ratio and thickness guideline ensures foundation stability against dynamic loads and vibration.
Two-Mass System Model for Hammer Foundation Vibration Analysis (IS 2974 Part 2)
The hammer-foundation system is modeled as two masses:
Springs:
Velocity input (V1): Calculated from the momentum equation of the hammer impact.
Natural frequencies (fni, fna): Found by solving the characteristic equation derived from the two-mass system dynamics:
[ f^2 - (f_{na}^2 + f_{nb}^2)(1+B) f^2 + (1+B) f_{na}^2 f_{nb}^2 = 0 ]
Amplitude of vibration depends on these frequencies and velocity (V_1), showing resonance effects.
For high-speed hammers (>150 strokes/min), calculate natural frequencies and amplitudes to ensure vibrations are within permissible limits.
For low-speed hammers, ensure foundation deflection under single impact is within allowable range.
Loading diagram...
This model helps predict vibration amplitudes and frequencies, guiding foundation design to avoid resonance and excessive vibration.
According to IS 2974 Part 2 for hammer foundations:
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Concrete Grade | Minimum M15 |
| Material | Reinforced Concrete |
| Relevant Code | IS 456:1978 (Concrete) |
This ensures sufficient strength and stiffness for the hammer foundation block under dynamic loading conditions.
Design of Elastic Cushioning Between Anvil and Foundation Block (IS 2974 Part 2)
The elastic cushioning (protective cushioning layer) is provided to:
Select cushion material with known elastic modulus (E).
Calculate cushion thickness (t) based on maximum impact load (P) and allowable deformation:
[ \delta = \frac{P \times t}{A \times E} \leq \delta_{max} ]
where:
Check stress intensity in the cushion:
[ \sigma = \frac{P}{A} \leq \sigma_{allow} ]
Provide detailed specifications of the cushion in drawings (material, thickness, E, δ_max, σ_allow).
Loading diagram...
Summary: Design the elastic cushioning by selecting suitable material and thickness to limit deformation and stress within allowable limits, ensuring durability and protection of the foundation block.
According to IS 2974 Part 2, the permissible vibration amplitudes for hammer foundations are specified as follows:
| Mass of Tup | Foundation Block Amplitude | Anvil Amplitude |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 1 tonne | 1 mm | 1 mm |
| 1 to 3 tonnes | 1.5 mm | 2 mm |
| More than 3 tonnes | 2 mm | 3 to 4 mm |
Summary:
Loading diagram...
This ensures structural safety and minimizes vibration damage to adjacent foundations.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 2974 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required