IS 2974 Part 21980AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Code of practice for design and construction of machine foundations, Part 2: Foundations for impact type machines (hammer foundations)

IS 2974 Part 2 (1980) provides the code of practice for the design and construction of foundations specifically for impact type machines, such as hammer foundations. It addresses the unique challenges posed by repeated impact loads and vibrations, guiding engineers on foundation mass, dimensions, materials, and vibration analysis to ensure structural stability and operational safety. This standard is essential for civil and foundation engineers involved in installing heavy forging and hammer machinery.

7Sections
64Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1980Edition
Soil and Foundation EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 2974 Part 2 PDF, IS 2974 Part 2 pdf free download, IS 2974 Part 2 free download pdf, IS2974Part2 PDF, IS-2974-Part-2 PDF, IS 2974 Part 2 1980 PDF, IS 2974 Part 2:1980 PDF, IS 2974 Part 2-1980 PDF, IS 2974 Part 2 (1980) PDF, IS 2974 Part 2 1980 edition PDF, IS 2974 Part 2 edition 1980 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 2974 Part 2 (1980) provides the code of practice for the design and construction of foundations specifically for impact type machines, such as hammer foundations. It addresses the unique challenges posed by repeated impact loads and vibrations, guiding engineers on foundation mass, dimensions, materials, and vibration analysis to ensure structural stability and operational safety. This standard is essential for civil and foundation engineers involved in installing heavy forging and hammer machinery.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Foundation Engineers
  • Civil Engineers
  • Structural Engineers
  • Machine Installation Specialists
  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Industrial Plant Designers
  • Construction Project Managers

Key Topics Covered

Design principles for hammer foundations
Impact and vibration load considerations
Two-mass system vibration analysis
Foundation block mass and dimensional criteria
Elastic cushioning between anvil and foundation
Permissible amplitudes and stresses
Soil bearing capacity and subsoil properties
Reinforced concrete specifications for foundations
Construction practices and joint detailing
Protective layers and damping elements
Anchor bolt placement and tolerances
Frequency and amplitude relationship to avoid resonance

Table of Contents

1Scope

Scope and Key Parameters - IS 2974 (Part 2) - 1980

This part covers dynamic load testing of pile foundations using a two-mass system model (tup + anvil + foundation block).

Key Notations (Clause 2.1 - Table A-2.1)

ParameterSymbolUnit
Mass of tupW1kg
Mass of anvilWakg
Mass of frameWbkg
Height of fall of tuphcm
Frequency of impactNblows/min
Area of pistonAcm²
Area of anvil baseAbcm²
Thickness of padtcm (e.g., 41 cm)
Elastic modulus of padEpkg/cm²
Mass of foundation blockWfkg (e.g., 15 kg)
Area of foundation blockAbcm²
Equivalent radius of foundationrcm
Dynamic shear modulus of soilGkg/cm²
Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soilCukg/cm³
Spring coefficient of pile foundationKpkg/cm
Elastic modulus of pile materialEpkg/cm²
Cross-sectional area of pileApcm²
Length of pileLcm

Important Relations (Clause 2.2.1)

  • Total mass on foundation block = Wa + Wb (depending on frame attachment)
  • Spring constant of soil or foundation system:
    [ k_y = 1.45 , \text{kg/cm} ]

Cushioning Details (Clause 3.3)

  • If resilient pad used:

    • Elastic modulus (Ep)
    • Max allowable deformation
    • Allowable stress intensity
  • If springs/dampers used:

    • Max allowable spring deflections (normal/extreme)
    • Details of springs and dampers

Two-Mass System Model (Fig. 3)

graph LR
  Tup(W1)
2Definitions

IS 2974 Part 2 - Definitions and Key Parameters

Key Notations (Clause 2.1, Table A-2.1)

ParameterSymbolUnitDescription
Mass of tupW₁kgMass of the drop weight (tup)
Mass of anvilWₐkgMass of the anvil
Mass of frameW_fkgMass of the frame attached to anvil/foundation
Height of fall of tuphcmDrop height of tup
Frequency of impactNblows/minNumber of impacts per minute
Area of pistonA_pcm²Cross-sectional area of piston
Area of anvil baseA_acm²Contact area of anvil base
Elastic modulus of padE_pkg/cm²Modulus of elasticity of cushioning pad
Thickness of padt_pcmThickness of cushioning pad
Mass of foundation blockW_bkgMass of foundation block
Area of foundation blockA_bcm²Contact area of foundation block
Equivalent radius of basercmRadius for equivalent circular base
Dynamic shear modulus of soilGkg/cm²Soil's dynamic shear modulus
Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soilC_ukg/cm³Soil compression coefficient
Spring coefficient of pile foundationK_pkg/cmSpring stiffness of pile foundation
Elastic modulus of pile materialE_pilekg/cm²Modulus of elasticity of pile material
Cross-sectional area of pileA_pilecm²Cross-section of pile
Length of pileL_pilecmLength of pile

Important Formulas (Clause 2.2.1)

  • Effective Mass Addition: [ W = W_a + W_f \quad \text{(if frame attached to anvil)} ] or \
3Necessary Data

IS 2974 Part 2 - Necessary Data & Key Parameters

Key Parameters (Clause 3.1)

  • Masses:
    • Total hammer mass (frame + falling parts)
    • Falling parts mass (tup + top die)
    • Anvil mass (plus frame mass if attached)
  • Energy of impact
  • Blows per minute (frequency)
  • Anvil basic dimensions
  • Manufacturer's drawings (cross-section, plan, elevation, anchor bolt details)
  • Coefficient of impact of anvil (for extreme die-to-die blows)

Notations & Typical Data (Clause 2.1, Table A-2.1)

ParameterSymbolUnit
Mass of tupW₁kg
Mass of anvilW₂kg
Mass of frameWfkg
Height of fall of tuphcm
Frequency of impactNblows/min
Area of pistonApcm²
Area of anvil baseAbcm²
Thickness of padtcm
Elastic modulus of padEpkg/cm²
Mass of foundation blockWbkg
Equivalent radius of foundationrcm
Dynamic shear modulus of soilGkg/cm²
Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soilCukg/cm³
Spring coefficient of pile foundationKpkg/cm
Elastic modulus of pile materialEpkg/cm²
Cross-sectional area of pileApcm²
Length of pileLcm

Important Formulae (Clause 2.2.1)

  • Total mass for dynamic analysis:

    [ W = W_a + W_b + W_f \quad \text{(depending on frame attachment)} ]

  • Energy of Impact:

    [ E = W_1 \times g \times h ]

    Where:

    • (W_1) = mass of tup (kg)
    • (g\
4Design Criteria

IS 2974 Part 2 - Design Criteria for Hammer Foundations

Key Design Requirements (Clause 3.1)

  • Alignment: Centres of gravity of anvil, foundation block, and resultants of elastic pad & foundation support forces should align closely with the hammer tup's line of fall.
  • Vibration Control: Induced vibrations in nearby structures must be within safe limits.
  • Natural Frequency:
    • Avoid natural frequency (f_n) being an integer multiple of impact frequency (f_i).
    • Recommended: ( f_n \geq 2.5 \times f_i ) or
    • If ( f_n < f_i ), then ( f_n \leq 0.7 \times f_i ) (30% below).

Cushioning Details (Clause 3.3)

  • Resilient Pad:

    • Elastic modulus ( E_p )
    • Max allowable deformation ( \delta_{max} )
    • Allowable stress intensity ( \sigma_{allow} )
  • Springs & Dampers:

    • Max spring deflections for normal/extreme & static/dynamic loads
    • Details of spring constants and damping coefficients

Important Parameters (Clause 2.1 & 2.2.1)

ParameterSymbolUnit
Mass of tup( W_1 )kg
Mass of anvil( W_a )kg
Mass of frame( W_f )kg
Height of fall( h )cm
Frequency of impact( N )blows/min
Elastic modulus of pad( E_p )kg/cm²
Thickness of pad( t_p )cm
Mass of foundation block( W_b )kg
Area of foundation block( A_b )cm²
Equivalent radius of base( r )cm
Dynamic shear modulus of soil( G )kg/cm²
Spring coefficient of pile foundation( K_p )kg/cm

Natural Frequency Calculation for Two-Mass System (Fig. 3)

[ f_n = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{K}{M}} ]

  • ( K ) =
5Vibration Analysis

IS 2974 Part 2: Vibration Analysis Key Points

1. Two-Mass System Model (Clause A-1.1)

  • System: Mass ( m_1 ) subjected to velocity ( V_1 ).
  • Natural Frequencies ( f_{ni}, f_{na} ): Roots of [ f^2 - (f_{2na} + f_{onb})(1+B) f^2 + (1+B) f_{ans} f_{2b} = 0 ]
  • Amplitude of Vibrations: [ a_1 = \frac{(f_{ena} - f_{ong})(f_2 D_s - f_{em}) V_1}{2m f_{na} (f_{on} - f_{ona})} ] [ a_3 = \frac{2m (f_{2nl} - f_{an2}) f_{na} V_1}{(f_{on} - f_{on})} ]

2. Hammer Foundation Mass Ratios (Clause 4.4.3)

  • Mass of anvil: ~20 × mass of tup.
  • Foundation block mass ( W_b ):
    • ≥ 3 × anvil mass (general)
    • 4–5 × anvil mass (stiff clay/compact sand)
    • 5–6 × anvil mass (soft clay/loose sand)

3. Key Parameters (Clause 2.1, Table A-2.1)

ParameterSymbolUnit
Mass of tup( m_t )kg
Mass of anvil( m_a )kg
Mass of foundation block( W_b )kg
Height of fall of tup( h )cm
Frequency of impact( N )blows/min
Elastic modulus of pad( E_p )kg/cm²
Thickness of pad( t_p )cm
Dynamic shear modulus of soil( G )kg/cm²
Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soil( C
6Construction

IS 2974 (Part 2) - Key Construction Formulas & Specifications

Notations (Clause 2.1)

  • W₁ = Mass of frame (kg)
  • h = Height of fall of tup (cm)
  • N = Frequency of impact (blows/min)
  • A = Area of piston (cm²)
  • Ab = Area of foundation block (cm²)
  • Ep = Elastic modulus of pile material (kg/cm²)
  • Ap = Cross-sectional area of pile (cm²)
  • G = Dynamic shear modulus of soil (kg/cm²)
  • Cu = Coefficient of uniform elastic compression of soil (kg/cm³)
  • Kp = Spring coefficient of pile foundations (kg/cm)

Key Formulas (Clause 2.2.1 & 2.2.2)

  • Loading intensity on pad:
    [ \sigma_1 = K_1 \cdot \delta_1 \cdot A \quad \text{(kg/cm}^2\text{)} ] where ( K_1 ) is a constant, (\delta_1) is pad deflection.

  • Soil loading intensity:
    [ \sigma_2 = \frac{W_a - W_b + W_e + k_2 L_b - A_b}{2 \pi r f_{nb} V_{bs}} \times (1 + k) ] Must be less than allowable soil bearing pressure.

  • Maximum deflection of foundation (single impact):
    [ \delta = \frac{2 w f_{nb} V'}{1 + W_a + W_b + W_3} ] (V') = velocity after impact, (f_{nb}) = natural frequency (Hz).

Pad Cushioning (Clause 3.3)

  • If resilient pad used:

    • Elastic modulus
    • Max allowable deformation
    • Allowable stress intensity
  • If springs/dampers used:

    • Max spring deflections (normal/extreme)
    • Details of springs and dampers

Summary Table of Parameters

| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | |----------------------------------|--------

Appendix AVibration Analysis of a Two-Mass System and Its Application to Design of Hammer Foundations

Vibration Analysis of Two-Mass System (IS 2974 Part 2)

Key Formulas:

  • Natural frequencies (fn1, fn2):
    The two natural frequencies are roots of:
    [ f^2 - (f_{na}^2 + f_{nb}^2)(1+B)f + (1+B)f_{na}^2 f_{nb}^2 = 0 ]
    where ( B = \frac{m_2}{m_1} ), ( f_{na} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_1}{m_1}} ), ( f_{nb} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k_2}{m_2}} ).

  • Amplitude of vibrations:
    [ x_1 = \frac{(f_{na}^2 - f^2)}{(f^2 - f_{na}^2)(f^2 - f_{nb}^2)} V_1, \quad x_2 = \frac{2m (f_{na}^2 - f_{nb}^2) f_{na}}{(f_{na}^2 - f_{nb}^2)} V_1 ]

  • Velocity (V_1) is calculated from the momentum equation of the hammer impact.

Application to Hammer Foundations:

  • Masses:

    • (m_1): Anvil + frame (if attached)
    • (m_2): Foundation block + frame (if attached)
  • Springs:

    • (k_1): Elastic pad stiffness between anvil and block
    • (k_2): Foundation soil stiffness

Design Specifications:

  • Foundation must be deep enough to maintain strength where 'cut-in' by anvil pits (Clause 6.7).
  • Centres of gravity and force resultants should align with hammer tup fall line.
  • Avoid natural frequency (f_n) being integer multiples of hammer impact frequency (f_i).
    • Prefer (f_n \geq 2.5 f_i) or
    • (f_n \leq 0.7 f_i) (30% below (f_i)).

Popular Questions About IS 2974 Part 2

?What are the minimum mass requirements for the foundation block relative to the anvil?

According to IS 2974 Part 2, Clause 4.4.3:

  • The mass of the foundation block (Wb) shall be at least 3 times the mass of the anvil.
  • For foundations on stiff clays or compact sandy deposits, the block mass should be 4 to 5 times the anvil mass.
  • For moderately firm to soft clays and medium dense to loose sandy deposits, the block mass should be 5 to 6 times the anvil mass.

Summary Table:

Soil ConditionFoundation Block Mass (Wb) Relative to Anvil Mass (Wa)
General≥ 3 × Wa
Stiff clays / Compact sandy deposits4 to 5 × Wa
Moderately firm to soft clays / Loose sands5 to 6 × Wa

This ensures stability against vibrations and dynamic forces from the hammer operation.


Additional Note on Depth (Clause 4.4.2):

Minimum foundation block thickness depends on tup mass (for design safety):

Tup Mass (tonnes)Min Foundation Block Thickness (m)
Up to 1.01.00
1.0 to 2.01.25
2.0 to 4.01.75
4.0 to 6.02.25
Over 6.02.50

This mass ratio and thickness guideline ensures foundation stability against dynamic loads and vibration.

?How is the two-mass system model used to analyze hammer foundation vibrations?

Two-Mass System Model for Hammer Foundation Vibration Analysis (IS 2974 Part 2)

  • The hammer-foundation system is modeled as two masses:

    • m1: Anvil (plus frame mass if attached)
    • m2: Foundation block (plus frame mass if attached here)
  • Springs:

    • k1: Elastic pad between anvil and foundation block
    • k2: Foundation support stiffness
  • Velocity input (V1): Calculated from the momentum equation of the hammer impact.

  • Natural frequencies (fni, fna): Found by solving the characteristic equation derived from the two-mass system dynamics:

    [ f^2 - (f_{na}^2 + f_{nb}^2)(1+B) f^2 + (1+B) f_{na}^2 f_{nb}^2 = 0 ]

  • Amplitude of vibration depends on these frequencies and velocity (V_1), showing resonance effects.

  • For high-speed hammers (>150 strokes/min), calculate natural frequencies and amplitudes to ensure vibrations are within permissible limits.

  • For low-speed hammers, ensure foundation deflection under single impact is within allowable range.


Summary Diagram

Loading diagram...

This model helps predict vibration amplitudes and frequencies, guiding foundation design to avoid resonance and excessive vibration.

?What materials and concrete grades are recommended for hammer foundations?

According to IS 2974 Part 2 for hammer foundations:

  • Foundation Block Material: Reinforced concrete is mandatory.
  • Concrete Grade: Minimum grade M15 as per IS 456:1978.

Key Points:

  • The foundation must be designed to handle dynamic loads and vibrations.
  • The concrete should have adequate strength and durability for impact and vibration.
  • Reinforcement should be detailed per IS 456 to resist tensile stresses due to hammer impacts.

Summary Table:

ParameterSpecification
Concrete GradeMinimum M15
MaterialReinforced Concrete
Relevant CodeIS 456:1978 (Concrete)

This ensures sufficient strength and stiffness for the hammer foundation block under dynamic loading conditions.

?How should elastic cushioning between the anvil and foundation block be designed?

Design of Elastic Cushioning Between Anvil and Foundation Block (IS 2974 Part 2)

The elastic cushioning (protective cushioning layer) is provided to:

  • Prevent bouncing of the anvil,
  • Avoid large impact stresses,
  • Protect the concrete surface of the foundation block.

Key Design Parameters (Clauses 2.7, 3.2 & 3.3):

  • Material: Suitable elastic material (e.g., rubber, neoprene).
  • Thickness: Adequate to absorb impact without excessive deformation.
  • Elastic Modulus (E): Must be specified to ensure proper stiffness.
  • Maximum Allowable Deformation (δ_max): Limits cushion compression to prevent damage.
  • Allowable Stress Intensity (σ_allow): Ensures the cushion material withstands impact stresses.

Design Steps:

  1. Select cushion material with known elastic modulus (E).

  2. Calculate cushion thickness (t) based on maximum impact load (P) and allowable deformation:

    [ \delta = \frac{P \times t}{A \times E} \leq \delta_{max} ]

    where:

    • (P) = Impact load,
    • (A) = Contact area,
    • (E) = Elastic modulus,
    • (\delta) = Deformation.
  3. Check stress intensity in the cushion:

    [ \sigma = \frac{P}{A} \leq \sigma_{allow} ]

  4. Provide detailed specifications of the cushion in drawings (material, thickness, E, δ_max, σ_allow).


Loading diagram...

Summary: Design the elastic cushioning by selecting suitable material and thickness to limit deformation and stress within allowable limits, ensuring durability and protection of the foundation block.

?What are the permissible vibration amplitudes to ensure structural safety?

According to IS 2974 Part 2, the permissible vibration amplitudes for hammer foundations are specified as follows:

Permissible Amplitudes (Clause 4.3.1)

Mass of TupFoundation Block AmplitudeAnvil Amplitude
Up to 1 tonne1 mm1 mm
1 to 3 tonnes1.5 mm2 mm
More than 3 tonnes2 mm3 to 4 mm

Vibration Velocity Limit Near Important Structures (Clause 4.3.2)

  • The velocity of vibrations at any nearby important structure should not exceed 0.3 cm/s.
  • Foundation amplitude should be controlled accordingly to meet this velocity limit.

Additional Design Notes (Clause 3.5 & 4.1)

  • Design to ensure the natural frequency of the foundation system avoids resonance with hammer impact frequency (preferably ≥ 2.5 times or ≤ 0.7 times the impact frequency).
  • Consider the combined natural frequency of the two-mass spring system (anvil + foundation).

Summary:

  • Limit foundation block vibration amplitude to max 2 mm (for heavy hammers).
  • Keep vibration velocity at nearby structures ≤ 0.3 cm/s to ensure safety.
Loading diagram...

This ensures structural safety and minimizes vibration damage to adjacent foundations.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 2974 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required