IS 2386 Part 51963AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete, Part V: Soundness

IS 2386 Part 5 (1963) specifies the test methods to evaluate the soundness of aggregates used in concrete by assessing their resistance to disintegration when subjected to saturated sodium sulphate or magnesium sulphate solutions. This standard is essential for engineers and quality control professionals to predict the durability of aggregates under weathering conditions, ensuring the long-term performance of concrete structures.

10Sections
128Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1963Edition
Cement Concrete Aggregates and RCCCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 2386 Part 5 PDF, IS 2386 Part 5 pdf free download, IS 2386 Part 5 free download pdf, IS2386Part5 PDF, IS-2386-Part-5 PDF, IS 2386 Part 5 1963 PDF, IS 2386 Part 5:1963 PDF, IS 2386 Part 5-1963 PDF, IS 2386 Part 5 (1963) PDF, IS 2386 Part 5 1963 edition PDF, IS 2386 Part 5 edition 1963 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 2386 Part 5 (1963) specifies the test methods to evaluate the soundness of aggregates used in concrete by assessing their resistance to disintegration when subjected to saturated sodium sulphate or magnesium sulphate solutions. This standard is essential for engineers and quality control professionals to predict the durability of aggregates under weathering conditions, ensuring the long-term performance of concrete structures.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Civil Engineers
  • Concrete Technologists
  • Quality Control Engineers
  • Materials Testing Laboratory Technicians
  • Construction Project Managers
  • Aggregate Suppliers
  • Structural Engineers

Key Topics Covered

Soundness testing of aggregates
Use of sodium sulphate and magnesium sulphate solutions
Sample preparation and grading requirements
Apparatus and container specifications
Temperature regulation during testing
Quantitative and qualitative examination of test samples
Determination of aggregate disintegration and loss
Sieve analysis before and after testing
Reporting and interpretation of test results
Handling of coarse and fine aggregates
Cycle repetition for immersion and drying
Calculation of weighted average loss

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 2386 Part 5: Scope & Key Specifications


Scope Summary

  • Covers technical provisions for testing aggregates for concrete, specifically soundness tests.
  • Does not include contract provisions.
  • Final test results should be rounded off as per IS 2:1960.

Key Apparatus: Sieves (Clause 2.1)

Fine Series (mm)Coarse Series (mm)
0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.18, 2.36, 4.0, 4.758, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80

All sieves comply with IS 460:1962.


Soundness Test Data Recording (Clause 9.2, Table I)

Sieve Size% GradingWeight Before Test (g)% Passing After TestWeighted Avg. % Loss
Example: 600 µm26.0%1004.2%1.09
  • Weighted average loss helps assess aggregate durability.
  • Separate tables for fine and coarse aggregates.

Rounding Off (Clause 0.5)

  • Use IS 2:1960 for rounding.
  • Maintain same significant figures as specified.

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Aggregate Sample] --> B[Sieving as per IS 460]
    B --> C[Soundness Test]
    C --> D[Record Weight & % Passing (Table I)]
    D --> E[Calculate Weighted Avg % Loss]
    E --> F[Round off results (IS 2:1960)]
    F --> G[Assess Aggregate Quality]

Use this scope and data format for consistent soundness testing of aggregates per IS 2386 Part 5.

2Apparatus

IS 2386 Part 5: Apparatus - Key Specifications & Tables

1. Sieves (Clause 2.1)

Sieves must have square openings per IS 460-1962. Sizes for fine and coarse aggregates:

Fine Series (mm)Coarse Series (mm)
0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.18, 2.36, 4.758, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80

2. Drying Oven (Clause 2.5)

  • Temperature: 105° to 110°C
  • Evaporation rate: ≥ 25 g/h over 4 hours (doors closed)
  • Test method: Water loss from 1-litre beakers with 500 g water at 27±2°C placed at 5 points in oven.

3. Reporting Soundness Test Data (Clause 9.2)

Use Table I format for recording:

Sieve Size% Grading of Original SampleWeight Before Test (g)% Passing Finer Sieve After Test (Loss %)Weighted Average Loss (%)
Example: 600 micron26.01004.21.09
  • Weighted average loss calculated as:

[ \text{Weighted Average Loss} = \sum \left(\frac{\text{Weight fraction}}{\text{Total weight}} \times \text{Percent loss}\right) ]


Summary Diagram: Apparatus Setup

graph LR
A[Sieves] --> B[Fine Series: 0.15 to 4.75 mm]
A --> C[Coarse Series: 8 to 80 mm]
D[Drying Oven] --> E[105-110°C]
D --> F[Evaporation ≥ 25 g/h]
G[Soundness Test Data] --> H[Record sieve size, weights, losses]

Note: Round off test results per IS 2-1960 rules, matching significant figures of specified values.

This ensures compliance

3Sampling and Sample Preparation

IS 2386 Part 5: Sampling and Sample Preparation Key Points

1. Sample Size & Preparation (Clause 4.1)

  • Fine aggregate sample must pass through 10 mm IS sieve.
  • Minimum 100 g of each size fraction (≥5% of total) must be available, sized as:
Passing IS SieveRetained on IS Sieve
600 micron300 micron
1.18 mm600 micron
2.36 mm1.18 mm
4.75 mm2.36 mm
10 mm4.75 mm

2. Sieves (Clause 2.1)

  • Use IS 460:1962 compliant sieves with square openings.
  • Fine series: 150, 300, 600 micron, 1.18, 2.36, 4.00, 4.75 mm.
  • Coarse series: 8, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80 mm.

3. Percentage Loss Calculation (Clause 11.2)

  • When a size fraction is <5% of the original sample, use the percentage loss of the next smaller size.
  • Example: 11.2% loss used for 10 mm fraction with <5% sample.

4. Recording Test Data (Clause 9.2, Table I)

  • Record sieve size, grading %, weight before test, % passing finer sieve after test (actual loss), and weighted average corrected loss.
  • Weighted average loss formula:

[ \text{Weighted Average Loss} = \sum \left(\frac{\text{Weight Fraction}}{\text{Total Weight}}\times \text{Corrected % Loss}\right) ]


Summary Table Example (Soundness Test for Fine Aggregate)

Sieve SizeGrading %Weight Before Test (g)% Passing Finer Sieve After TestWeighted Average Loss
600 micron26.01004.21.09
4Test Sample Requirements

IS 2386 Part 5 — Test Sample Requirements Summary


1. Fine Aggregate Sample (Clause 4.1)

  • Pass through 10 mm IS sieve.
  • Sample size must yield ≥100 g for each size fraction ≥5% by weight.
  • Size fractions based on sieves:
Passing IS SieveRetained on IS Sieve
1.18 mm600 micron
2.36 mm1.18 mm
4.75 mm2.36 mm
10 mm4.75 mm
600 micron300 micron

2. Coarse Aggregate Sample (Clause 4.2)

  • Remove particles finer than 4.75 mm.
  • Minimum sample weights for size fractions (≥5% by weight):
Size RangeYield (g)Fraction Composition (%)
10 mm to 4.75 mm300-
20 mm to 10 mm1,00012.5-10 mm: 33%, 20-12.5 mm: 67%
40 mm to 20 mm1,50025-20 mm: 33%, 40-25 mm: 67%
63 mm to 40 mm3,00050-40 mm: 50%, 63-50 mm: 50%
≥80 mm3,00020 mm sieve spread per fraction

3. Reporting Format (Clause 9.2 - Table I)

  • Record:

    • Sieve sizes (Passing & Retained)
    • % Grading of original sample
    • Weight before test
    • % Passing finer sieve after test (loss %)
    • Weighted average loss (corrected %)

Notes:

  • If a size fraction <5%, use % loss of next smaller size (Clause 11.2).
  • Larger sample sizes than minimum are permitted.

flowchart TD
    A[Sample Collection] --> B{Fine or Coarse Aggregate?}
    B
5Preparation of Test Sample

IS 2386 Part 5: Preparation of Test Sample – Key Points

1. Sample Size & Grading (Clause 4.1 & 4.4)

  • Fine aggregate sample: Pass through 10 mm IS sieve.
  • Minimum 100 g of each size fraction with ≥5% content is required.
  • Sizes for fine aggregate fractions (passing & retained on):
Passing IS SieveRetained on IS Sieve
600 µm300 µm
1.18 mm600 µm
2.36 mm1.18 mm
4.75 mm2.36 mm
10 mm4.75 mm
  • If a size fraction is <5%, assign its loss as average of the adjacent sizes (Clause 4.4).

2. Sieves to Use (Clause 2.1)

Fine Series (µm/mm)Coarse Series (mm)
150 µm8 mm
300 µm10 mm
600 µm12.5 mm
1.18 mm16 mm
2.36 mm20 mm
4.75 mm25 mm
31.5 mm
40 mm
50 mm
63 mm
80 mm

3. Calculation of Weighted Average Loss (from Table I)

[ \text{Weighted Average Loss} = \sum \left(\frac{\text{Weight of fraction before test}}{\text{Total weight}}\times \text{Percent loss of fraction}\right) ]

  • Use this to report soundness loss after sodium or magnesium sulfate treatment.

Summary Flow for Sample Preparation & Testing:

flowchart TD
    A[Collect Aggregate Sample] --> B[Pass through 10 mm sieve (fine agg.)]
    B --> C[Separate size fractions as per IS sieves]
    C --> D{Is fraction ≥5%?}
    D -- Yes --> E[Include fraction
6Test Procedure

IS 2386 Part 5: Test Procedure Key Points

1. Apparatus (Clause 2.1)

  • Use IS 460:1962 compliant sieves.
  • Fine sieves: 150, 300, 600 microns, 1.18, 2.36, 4.75 mm.
  • Coarse sieves: 8, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80 mm.

2. Quantitative Examination (Clause 7.1)

  • After final cycle and cooling, wash sample free from sulfate using BaCl₂ test.
  • Dry fractions at 105-110°C to constant weight.
  • Sieve fractions as per aggregate size to determine loss:
Aggregate Size (mm)Sieve for Loss Determination (mm)
63 to 4031.5
40 to 2016
20 to 108.0
10 to 4.754.0

3. Reporting (Clause 9.2, Table I)

  • Record:
    • Sieve size, grading %, weight before test.
    • % passing finer sieve after test (actual loss).
    • Weighted average corrected % loss.
Sieve SizeGrading %Weight Before Test% Passing After TestWeighted Avg. Loss
Example26.01004.21.09

4. Rounding (Clause 0.5)

  • Round off results per IS 2:1960 rules, matching significant digits of standard values.

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Sample Preparation] --> B[Final Cycle & Cooling]
    B --> C[Wash Sample (BaCl₂ test)]
    C --> D[Dry to constant weight (105-110°C)]
    D --> E[Sieve fractions by aggregate size]
    E --> F[Weigh fractions]
    F --> G[Calculate % loss & weighted average]
    G --> H[Record in Table I format]

This summarizes

7Quantitative Examination

IS 2386 Part 5: Quantitative Examination Key Points

Procedure (Clause 7.1)

  • After final cycle & cooling, wash sample free of sodium/magnesium sulphate using BaCl₂ test.
  • Dry each fraction at 105–110°C to constant weight.
  • Weigh fractions.
  • Sieve aggregates as per size:
Aggregate Size (mm)Sieve Used to Determine Loss (mm)
63 to 4031.5
40 to 2016
20 to 108.0
10 to 4.754.00

Reporting (Clause 9.2)

  • Use Table I format to record:
    • Sieve size
    • % grading of original sample
    • Weight before test
    • % passing finer sieve after test (actual loss)
    • Weighted average (corrected % loss)

Notes

  • Qualitative examination (Clause 8.2) involves observing particle damage types (disintegration, splitting, cracking).
  • Recommended to sieve combined fractions post-test for cumulative % retained on standard sieves (150μ, 300μ, 600μ, 1.18, 2.36, 4.75, 10, 20, 40, 80 mm).

Summary Table for Quantitative Examination

StepDescription
WashingRemove sulphate using BaCl₂ test
DryingDry at 105–110°C to constant weight
SievingUse specified sieve based on aggregate size
WeighingWeigh dried fractions
Record & Calculate LossUse Table I format to compute weighted loss
flowchart TD
    A[Sample after final cycle] --> B[Wash with water + BaCl₂ test]
    B --> C[Dry fractions at 105-110°C]
    C --> D[Sieve fractions as per size]
    D --> E[Weigh each fraction]
    E --> F[Calculate % loss & report in Table I format]

This method ensures accurate measurement of aggregate soundness loss due to sulphate attack.

8Qualitative Examination

IS 2386 Part 5: Qualitative Examination Summary

1. Visual Examination (Clause 4.00 & 8.2)

  • Examine each fraction visually for excessive grain splitting.
  • Observe effects of sodium/magnesium sulphate action:
    • Types: disintegration, splitting, crumbling, cracking, flaking.
  • Count number of affected particles.
  • Examine particles >20 mm primarily, but smaller sizes recommended.

2. Sieve Analysis (Clause 4.00)

  • After treatment, combine all sizes (including detritus).
  • Perform sieve analysis on sizes (microns & mm):
Sieve Sizes (micron/mm)
150, 300, 600 micron
1.18, 2.36 mm
4.75, 10, 20, 40, 80 mm
  • Record results as cumulative % retained on each sieve.

3. Quantitative Examination (Clause 7.1)

  • Wash sample free from sulphate (test with BaCl₂).
  • Dry fractions at 105°-110°C to constant weight.
  • Weigh and sieve aggregates over specified sieves:
Aggregate Size (mm)Sieve Used (mm)
63 to 4031.5
40 to 2016
20 to 108.0
10 to 4.754.00

flowchart TD
    A[Sample after test] --> B[Wash with water + BaCl₂ test]
    B --> C[Dry fractions at 105-110°C]
    C --> D[Weigh & sieve fractions]
    D --> E{Particle size}
    E --> |>20 mm| F[Qualitative exam: count affected particles]
    E --> |<=20 mm| G[Optional qualitative exam]
    D --> H[Record cumulative % retained]

Key Points:

  • Qualitative exam focuses on visual damage types and particle count.
  • Quantitative exam uses weight loss and sieve analysis.
  • Use BaCl₂ test to ensure removal of sulphate residues before weighing
9Reporting of Results

IS 2386 Part 5: Reporting of Soundness Test Results

Key Specifications (Clause 9.1 & 9.2)

  • Report must include:

    • Weight of each fraction before test.
    • % finer material by weight for each fraction.
    • Weighted average % loss based on grading (assume 0% loss for <300 micron).
    • For >20 mm particles: count of particles before test and affected (disintegrating, cracking, etc.).
    • Type of solution used (Na₂SO₄ or MgSO₄).
  • Rounding off: Follow IS 2-1960 rules; retain significant places as per specified values.

Suggested Form for Recording (Table I)

Sieve SizeRetained OnGrading %Weight Before Test (g)% Passing After Test (Loss %)Weighted Average Loss (%)
Example: 600 µm300 µm26.01004.21.09

Sum weighted average loss for all fractions to get total loss.

Sieve for Determining Loss (Clause 7.1)

Aggregate Size (mm)Sieve Used for Loss Determination (mm)
63 - 4031.5
40 - 2016
20 - 108
10 - 4.754

Calculation of Weighted Average Loss

[ \text{Weighted Average Loss} = \sum \left(\frac{\text{Grading %} \times \text{Loss %}}{100}\right) ]


flowchart TD
    A[Sample Preparation] --> B[Initial Weighing by Sieve Fractions]
    B --> C[Soundness Test Cycles]
    C --> D[Wash & Dry Sample]
    D --> E[Weigh Fractions After Test]
    E --> F[Calculate % Loss per Fraction]
    F --> G[Calculate Weighted Average Loss]
    G --> H[Prepare Report with Required Data]

This format ensures clarity and consistency in reporting aggregate soundness test results per IS 2386 Part 5.

10Notes and Recommendations

IS 2386 Part 5: Notes and Recommendations – Key Points

1. Recording Soundness Test Data (Clause 9.2, Table I)

  • Use the suggested form for recording test data including:
    • Sieve size (passing and retained)
    • Grading of original sample (%)
    • Weight of test fractions before test (g)
    • Percentage passing finer sieve after test (actual % loss)
    • Weighted average (corrected % loss)
ParameterDescription
Sieve SizesFrom 150 microns to 63 mm depending on aggregate size
Weight FractionsWeights before and after test for loss calculation
Weighted AverageSum of (% loss × grading %) to get overall loss

2. Quantitative Examination (Clause 7.1)

  • After final cycle and cooling:
    • Wash sample free of salts using BaCl₂ test.
    • Dry at 105° to 110°C to constant weight.
    • Sieve fine aggregates on original sieve.
    • Sieve coarse aggregates on specified sieve depending on size:
Aggregate Size (mm)Sieve to Determine Loss (mm)
63 to 4031.5
40 to 2016
20 to 108
10 to 4.754

3. Sieves Specifications (Clause 2.1)

  • Use sieves complying with IS:460-1962.
  • Common sieve sizes:
Fine Series (mm)Coarse Series (mm)
0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.18, 2.36, 4.758, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5, 40, 50, 63, 80

4. Rounding Off (Clause 0.5)

  • Round off test results as per IS:2-1960.
  • Keep the same significant figures as specified values.

Summary Formula for Weighted Average Loss:

[ \text{Weighted Average Loss} =

Popular Questions About IS 2386 Part 5

?What is the purpose of using sodium sulphate and magnesium sulphate solutions in the soundness test?

Purpose of Using Sodium Sulphate and Magnesium Sulphate Solutions in Soundness Test (IS 2386 Part 5):

  • These solutions simulate weathering action on aggregates by causing repeated cycles of salt crystallization and hydration.
  • The test evaluates the resistance to disintegration (soundness) of aggregates when exposed to such aggressive environments.
  • Sodium sulphate and magnesium sulphate differ in their chemical action; hence, results vary and must be interpreted carefully.
  • This test is especially useful when service history of aggregates is unavailable, providing a predictive measure of durability.

Key Points:

  • Aggregates are soaked in saturated Na₂SO₄ or MgSO₄ solutions for 16-18 hours at 27 ± 1°C.
  • Salt crystallization causes expansion and disintegration in weak aggregates.
  • Weight loss after cycles indicates soundness; lower loss = better durability.
Loading diagram...

This method helps engineers select aggregates with adequate durability for concrete exposed to weathering.

?How should aggregate samples be prepared and graded for testing under IS 2386 Part 5?

Preparation and Grading of Aggregate Samples as per IS 2386 Part 5

Fine Aggregate (Clause 5.1 & 4.1)

  • Washing & Drying: Wash thoroughly on a 300-micron IS sieve and dry at 105°–110°C to constant weight.
  • Sieving: Pass through 10 mm IS sieve.
  • Separation: Use a nest of sieves (10 mm, 4.75 mm, 2.36 mm, 1.18 mm, 600 micron, 300 micron).
  • Sample Size: Obtain at least 100 g from each size fraction that constitutes ≥5% of the total sample.
  • Final Sample: Weigh 100 g from each fraction after sieving to refusal; discard fine particles stuck in sieve meshes.

Coarse Aggregate (Clause 5.2 & 4.2)

  • Washing & Drying: Wash and dry at 105°–110°C to constant weight.
  • Sieving: Remove particles finer than 4.75 mm; separate into sizes per Table 4.2.
  • Sample Size: Minimum weights per size fraction (e.g., 300 g for 10–4.75 mm, 1,000 g for 20–10 mm, etc.).
  • Particle Count: For fractions coarser than 20 mm, count the number of particles.

Summary Table for Sample Sizes

Aggregate TypeSize Range (mm)Minimum Sample Weight (g)Notes
Fine300 µm to 10 mm≥100 g per fractionFractions ≥5% of total sample
Coarse10 - 4.75300
20 - 101,00033%: 12.5-10 mm; 67%: 20-12.5 mm
40 - 201,50033%: 25-20 mm; 67%: 40-25 mm
63 - 403,00050%: 50-40 mm; 50%: 63-50 mm
?What apparatus and containers are required to conduct the soundness test properly?

According to IS 2386 Part 5, the apparatus and containers for the soundness test of aggregates must meet these criteria:

  • Containers:

    • Perforated to allow free access and drainage of the solution without losing aggregate particles.
    • Should hold a solution volume at least 5 times the volume of the immersed aggregate sample.
    • Typical containers: wire mesh baskets or sieves with suitable openings.
  • Additional Apparatus:

    • Containers to hold the chemical solution (usually sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate).
    • Means to dry the samples between cycles (oven or drying chamber).
    • Balance for weighing samples before and after testing.

This ensures thorough exposure of aggregates to the solution for accurate soundness measurement.

Loading diagram...
?How is the loss of aggregate material calculated after the soundness test cycles?

According to IS 2386 Part 5, Clause 7.1, the loss of aggregate material after soundness test cycles is calculated as follows:

  1. Washing & Drying: After the final cycle and cooling, wash the sample free of sodium or magnesium sulphate (confirmed by BaCl₂ test). Dry the sample to constant weight at 105° to 110°C.

  2. Sieving: Separate the sample fractions using the specified sieve based on aggregate size:

Aggregate Size (mm)Sieve Used to Determine Loss (mm)
63 to 4031.5
40 to 2016
20 to 108
10 to 4.754
  1. Weight Measurement: Weigh each fraction before and after the test.

  2. Loss Calculation: Calculate the percentage loss based on weight difference and sieve analysis.

  3. Weighted Average Loss: Use grading percentages to compute weighted average loss, as illustrated in Table I (Clause 9.2).


Formula for Loss Percentage per Fraction

[ \text{Loss %} = \left(\frac{\text{Weight before test} - \text{Weight after test}}{\text{Weight before test}}\right) \times 100 ]

Weighted Average Loss

[ \text{Weighted Loss} = \sum \left(\frac{\text{Grading %}}{100} \times \text{Loss %}\right) ]


This method ensures quantification of durability loss due to salt crystallization cycles in aggregates.

?What are the typical limits or criteria for aggregate soundness based on this standard?

IS 2386 Part 5 deals with the Soundness Test for Aggregates, assessing their resistance to weathering (mainly freeze-thaw or sulfate attack).

Typical Limits/Criteria for Aggregate Soundness:

  • Test Method: Aggregates are subjected to cycles of immersion in sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate solutions followed by drying.
  • Loss in Weight: The soundness of aggregates is evaluated by the percentage loss in weight after specified cycles.

Acceptable Limits (as per IS 2386 Part 5 and common practice):

Aggregate TypeMaximum Allowable Loss (%)
Coarse Aggregate12% (for severe exposure)
Fine Aggregate18%
  • Interpretation:
    • Loss > specified limit indicates poor soundness; aggregate is unsuitable for concrete exposed to weathering.
    • Lower loss means better durability.

Summary:

  • Perform 5 cycles of sulfate solution immersion and drying.
  • Calculate percentage weight loss.
  • Compare with limits above for acceptance.
Loading diagram...

This ensures durability of concrete in aggressive environments.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 2386 Part 5. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required