IS 14496 Part 21998AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Guidelines for the preparation of landslide - Hazard zonation maps in mountainous terrains, Part 2: Macro-zonation

IS 14496 Part 2: 1998 provides comprehensive guidelines for preparing macro-scale landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) maps in mountainous terrains at scales of 1:25,000 or 1:50,000. It outlines a systematic approach to assess slope instability by evaluating key causative factors such as lithology, geological structure, slope morphometry, relative relief, land use, and hydrogeological conditions. This standard is essential for planners, geotechnical engineers, and environmental professionals involved in regional planning, hazard assessment, and mitigation of landslide risks in hill and mountain areas.

10Sections
77Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1998Edition
Hill Area Development EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 14496 Part 2 PDF, IS 14496 Part 2 pdf free download, IS 14496 Part 2 free download pdf, IS14496Part2 PDF, IS-14496-Part-2 PDF, IS 14496 Part 2 1998 PDF, IS 14496 Part 2:1998 PDF, IS 14496 Part 2-1998 PDF, IS 14496 Part 2 (1998) PDF, IS 14496 Part 2 1998 edition PDF, IS 14496 Part 2 edition 1998 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 14496 Part 2: 1998 provides comprehensive guidelines for preparing macro-scale landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) maps in mountainous terrains at scales of 1:25,000 or 1:50,000. It outlines a systematic approach to assess slope instability by evaluating key causative factors such as lithology, geological structure, slope morphometry, relative relief, land use, and hydrogeological conditions. This standard is essential for planners, geotechnical engineers, and environmental professionals involved in regional planning, hazard assessment, and mitigation of landslide risks in hill and mountain areas.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Geologists
  • Urban and Regional Planners
  • Environmental Consultants
  • Civil Engineers
  • Disaster Management Authorities
  • Infrastructure Developers in Mountainous Regions

Key Topics Covered

Landslide hazard zonation mapping methodology
Macro-zonation scale and mapping techniques
Identification and rating of causative factors
Lithology and rock/soil classification
Structural discontinuities and slope relationships
Slope morphometry and relative relief evaluation
Land use and land cover impact on slope stability
Hydrogeological conditions affecting landslides
Total Estimated Hazard Degree (TEHD) calculation
Preparation and interpretation of LHZ maps
Symbol conventions for geological and hazard maps
Guidelines for field investigations and desk studies
Revision protocols post-natural events
Application of LHZ maps for developmental planning
Safety and mitigation recommendations for hazard zones

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 14496 Part 2: Scope & Key Specifications

This part of IS 14496 focuses on landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) mapping using geological and geomorphological data.

Scope Highlights:

  • Utilizes topographic maps (1:50000 scale), aerial photos, satellite imagery, and geological maps.
  • Covers preparation of various thematic maps:
    • Slope Morphometric Map (Slope classes with angles)
    • Lithological & Structural Map
    • Relative Relief Map
    • Rock Outcrop & Soil Cover Map
    • Land Use & Land Cover Map
    • Hydrogeological Map
  • Assigns Land Hazard Evaluation Factor (LHEF) ratings to different categories.
  • Calculates Total Estimated Hazard (TEHD).
  • Produces a Macro Zonation Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Map.

Slope Morphometry Classes (Clause 6.3):

Slope TypeSlope Angle (°)
Very gentle slope≤ 15
Gentle slope16 to 25
Moderately steep slope26 to 35
Steep slope36 to 45
Escarpment/Cliff> 45

Procedure Overview (Fig. 1 Concept):

flowchart TD
    A[Acquire Topographic Maps 1:50000] --> B[Acquire Aerial Photos & Satellite Images]
    B --> C[Acquire Regional Geological Maps]
    C --> D[Prepare Thematic Maps]
    D --> E[Assign LHEF Ratings]
    E --> F[Calculate TEHD]
    F --> G[Prepare Landslide Hazard Zonation Map]

References:

  • IS 7422 Parts 1-5 for geological symbols and abbreviations.
  • Mountain Risk Engineering Handbook for methodology guidance.

This standard integrates multi-source data for systematic landslide hazard evaluation and zonation.

2References

IS 14496 Part 2 — References Summary

This part of IS 14496 references key Indian Standards related to geological symbols and abbreviations used in geological mapping and subsurface logs:

IS No.Title
IS 7422Symbols and abbreviations for geological maps and logs
Part 1 (1974)Abbreviations for geological terms
Part 2 (1974)Symbols for Igneous rocks
Part 3 (1974)Symbols for Sedimentary rocks
Part 4 (1985)Symbols for Metamorphic rocks
Part 5 (1992)Line symbols for formation contacts & structural features

Key Notes:

  • These standards define uniform symbols and abbreviations for geological features.
  • They ensure consistency in geological documentation.
  • Users should consult the latest editions for updated symbols.
  • The standard also draws from the Mountain Risk Engineering Handbook for guidance.

No specific formulas or tables are given here; this section mainly lists referenced standards to maintain consistency in geological symbol usage.

3Factors Considered for Macro-Zonation LHZ Maps

IS 14496 Part 2: Factors for Macro-Zonation Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Maps

Key Factors (Clause 3.1)

  • Lithology: Rock types influencing slope stability.
  • Structure: Geological discontinuities (faults, joints).
  • Slope Morphometry: Slope angle, shape, and length.
  • Relative Relief: Elevation difference influencing gravitational forces.
  • Land Use & Land Cover: Vegetation, urbanization affecting infiltration and stability.
  • Hydrogeological Conditions: Groundwater presence, seepage affecting pore pressure.

Hazard Classification (Clause 6.7)

SymbolHazard LevelDescription
VLHVery Low HazardSafe for development
LHLow HazardGenerally stable
MHModerate HazardLocal unstable pockets; requires detailed investigation
HHHigh HazardMostly unstable slopes
VHHVery High HazardActive unstable slopes; critical

Interpretation Guidelines (Clause 7.1)

  • VLH & LH: Suitable for development.
  • MH: Requires detailed geotechnical investigations.
  • HH & VHH: Detailed slope mapping (1:1000 or 1:2000 scale) and mitigation needed.
  • Risk assessment based on hazard rating, failure modes (e.g., debris flow, toe erosion), and damage potential.

Preparation Method (Annex A)

  1. Slope Facet Maps: Divide study area into slope facets.
  2. Pre-field Maps: Transfer geological, morphometric, relief, land use data onto facet maps.
  3. Factorial Maps: Validate and prepare individual maps for lithology, structure, slope, relief, land use, hydrogeology.
  4. LHZ Map: Combine factorial maps to generate hazard zonation.

flowchart TD
    A[Topographical Map] --> B[Slope Facet Division]
    B --> C[Pre-field Maps]
    C --> D[Field Validation]
    D --> E[Factorial Maps]
    E --> F[LHZ Map Preparation]
    F --> G[Hazard Classification & Interpretation]

Note: Revise LHZ maps after major earthquakes (>5 Richter), floods, cycl

4Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factors (LHEF) and Rating Scheme

IS 14496 Part 2: Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factors (LHEF) & Rating Scheme

1. LHEF Maximum Ratings for Macro-Zonation (Table 1, Clause 4.1)

Causative FactorMax LHEF Rating
Lithology2
Structure2
Slope Morphometry2
Relative Relief1
Land Use & Land Cover2
Hydrogeological Condition1

2. Detailed Rating Scheme (Table 2, Clause 4.2)

  • Lithology (Rock & Soil Types):
    Ratings depend on rock type and weathering correction factors (C1=4, C2=3, C3=2).
    Example:

    • Quartzite & Limestone (fresh): 0.2
    • Granite & Gabbro Gneiss: 0.3 - 0.4
    • Schist: 1.3
    • Shale with clay beds: 1.8
    • Soil types range from 0.8 (older compacted alluvial) to 2.0 (younger loose debris).
  • Structure:
    Ratings based on discontinuity-slope relationships:

    • Parallelism between slope and discontinuity dip direction (0.20 to 0.50)
    • Dip of discontinuity vs slope inclination (0.3 to 1.0)
    • Dip of discontinuity itself (0.20 to 0.50)
    • Depth of soil cover modifies rating (e.g., <5m = 0.65, 16-20m = 2.0).
  • Slope Morphometry:

    Slope CategorySlope AngleRating
    Escarpment/Cliff>45°2.0
    Steep slope36° - 45°1.7
    Moderately steep slope26° - 35°1.2
    Gentle slope16° - 25°0.
5Procedure for Macro-Zonation LHZ Mapping

IS 14496 Part 2: Procedure for Macro-Zonation Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Mapping

Key Steps (Clause 5.1, Annex A)

  1. Desk Study

    • Use aerial photos, satellite imagery, and toposheets.
    • Prepare pre-field maps at 1:50,000 scale:
      • Lithological map
      • Structural map
      • Slope morphometry map
      • Relative relief map
      • Rock outcrop & soil cover map
      • Land use & land cover map
      • Hydrogeological map
  2. Field Investigations

    • Validate and modify pre-field maps.
    • Prepare detailed lithological and structural maps.
    • Collect facet-wise data for hazard estimation.
  3. Slope Facet Mapping (Annex A-1)

    • Divide watershed into slope facets using topographic maps (Fig. 2 & 3).
  4. Factorial Maps Preparation (Annex A-3)

    • Assign ratings to each factor (see Table 2 in the code).
    • Structural discontinuities analyzed via stereonets.
    • Visual stability noted.
  5. LHZ Map Preparation (Annex A-4)

    • Assign extra rating (1.0) to 100-200 m strips along major faults/thrusts (Clause 1.0).
    • Combine factorial ratings to classify zones:
      • VLH (Very Low Hazard)
      • LH (Low Hazard)
      • MH (Moderate Hazard)
      • HH (High Hazard)
      • VHH (Very High Hazard)

Hazard Zone Usage (Clause 7.1)

  • VLH & LH: Generally safe for development.
  • MH: Local unstable pockets; detailed geotechnical investigations needed.
  • HH & VHH: Mostly unstable; require detailed slope mapping (1:1000 or 1:2000 scale) and mitigation.

Revision (Clause 9)

  • Update LHZ maps after major earthquakes (>5 Richter), floods, cyclones, or significant anthropogenic changes.

Example: Factorial Rating Combination (simplified)

FactorRating (Example)
Lithology0.5 - 1.5
Structure0.5 - 1.5
Slope
6Presentation of Results

IS 14496 Part 2: Presentation of Results (Clause 6)

Key Points for Presentation of Results:

  • Maps are the primary mode of presenting results, showing spatial distribution of parameters facet-wise.
  • Prepare Terrain Evaluation Maps first, depicting individual parameters.
  • Superimpose these maps to calculate Total Estimated Hazard Degree (TEHD) for each facet.
  • Use TEHD values to create a Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Map with zones:
    • High Hazard (HH)
    • Very High Hazard (VHH)

Suggested Symbols for Slope Morphometry (Clause 6.3):

Slope CategorySlope Angle (°)
Very gentle slope≤ 15
Gentle slope16 to 25
Moderately steep slope26 to 35
Steep slope36 to 45
Escarpment/Cliff> 45

Procedure for Macro Zonation (Fig. 1 Summary):

flowchart TD
    A[Acquire Topographic Maps 1:50000] --> B[Acquire Aerial Photos & Satellite Imageries]
    B --> C[Acquire Regional Geological Map]
    C --> D[Identify Hazard Evaluation Factors]
    D --> E[Prepare Pre-field Geological Map 1:50000]
    E --> F[Lithological & Structural Map 1:50000]
    F --> G[Slope Morphometric Map]
    G --> H[Relative Relief Map]
    H --> I[Assign Land Hazard Evaluation Factor (LHEF)]
    I --> J[Rock Outcrop & Soil Cover Map]
    J --> K[Land Use & Land Cover Map]
    K --> L[Hydrogeological Map]
    L --> M[Calculate TEHD]
    M --> N[Prepare Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Map]

References for Symbols and Abbreviations (IS 7422):

  • Part 1: Abbreviations
  • Part 2: Igneous Rocks
  • Part 3: Sedimentary Rocks
  • Part 4: Metamorphic Rocks
  • Part 5: Line Symbols for Contacts & Structures

Summary: Present terrain and hazard data as layered maps, calculate TEHD facet

7Interpretation of Macro-Zonation LHZ Map

Interpretation of Macro-Zonation Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Map (IS 14496 Part 2)

Key Hazard Zones & Their Meaning (Clause 6.7 & 7.1)

Hazard LevelDescription
Very Low Hazard (VLH)Generally safe for development
Low Hazard (LH)Generally safe for development
Moderate Hazard (MH)May contain unstable slope pockets; requires detailed geotechnical investigation
High Hazard (HH)Mostly unstable slopes; detailed slope mapping at 1:1000 or 1:2000 scale needed
Very High Hazard (VHH)Highly unstable slopes, often active; requires detailed geotechnical appraisal and mitigation

Factors Considered (Clause 7.1)

  • Hazard rating based on slope stability
  • Modes of failure: boulder jumping, debris flow, toe erosion, choked drainage, gully meandering
  • Damage risk to life and property

Preparation Steps (Annex A)

  1. Slope Facet Map: Divide topographic map into slope facets.
  2. Pre-Field Maps: Transfer geological, morphometric, relief, land use, and hydrogeological data.
  3. Factorial Maps: Prepare lithological, structural, slope morphometric, relative relief, land use, and hydrogeological maps; analyze structural discontinuities.
  4. LHZ Map: Combine desk study and field data (scale 1:25,000 or 1:50,000).

Revision of LHZ Map (Clause 9)

  • Update after major earthquakes (>5 Richter), floods, cyclones, mining, or cloud bursts.

Summary Flowchart of LHZ Mapping Process

flowchart TD
    A[Topographical Map] --> B[Slope Facet Division]
    B --> C[Pre-Field Maps Preparation]
    C --> D[Field Verification & Modification]
    D --> E[Factorial Maps Preparation]
    E --> F[Structural Analysis & Stability Assessment]
    F --> G[Landslide Hazard Zonation Map]
    G --> H[Periodic Revision after Major Events]

Note: Use scale 1:25,000 or 1:50,000 for macro-zonation; detailed slope mapping at 1:100

8Revision of Macro-Zonation LHZ Map

Revision of Macro-Zonation LHZ Map (IS 14496 Part 2)

Key Specifications:

  • Revision triggers: After major events like earthquakes (>5 Richter), floods, cyclones, mining, developmental activities, or cloud bursts affecting the watershed.
  • Scale for detailed slope mapping: 1:1000 or 1:2000 for unstable slopes (HH, VHH zones).
  • Hazard assessment basis: Hazard rating, failure modes (boulder jumping, debris flow, toe erosion, etc.), and damage type.

Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Categories (Table 3, Clause 5.3):

ZoneTEHD ValueDescription
I< 3.5Very Low Hazard (VLH)
II3.5 – 5.0Low Hazard (LH)
III5.1 – 6.0Moderate Hazard (MH)
IV6.1 – 7.5High Hazard (HH)
V> 7.5Very High Hazard (VHH)

Preparation Steps (Annex A):

  1. Slope Facet Maps: Divide topographical maps into slope facets.
  2. Pre-field Maps: Overlay geological, slope morphometric, relief, land use/cover, and wet patches data.
  3. Factorial Maps: Validate pre-field maps; prepare lithological, structural, morphometric, hydrogeological maps; plot structural discontinuities on stereonets.
  4. LHZ Map: Combine all factors using LHEF rating to compute Total Estimated Hazard Degree (TEHD).

flowchart TD
    A[Topographical Map] --> B[Slope Facet Division]
    B --> C[Pre-field Maps: Geological, Morphometric, Land Use]
    C --> D[Field Validation & Factorial Maps]
    D --> E[LHEF Rating & TEHD Calculation]
    E --> F[Landslide Hazard Zonation Map]
    F --> G[Revision after Major Events]

This process ensures updated and accurate hazard zoning for safer development and mitigation planning.

Annex ADetailed Method for Preparation of Landslide Hazard Zonation Map

IS 14496 Part 2: Detailed Method for Preparation of Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Map

Key Steps & Specifications:

  1. Slope Facet Maps Preparation (Annex A-1)

    • Divide topographical map (1:50,000 scale) into smaller slope facets (1:1,000 or 1:2,000 for detailed study).
  2. Pre-field Maps Preparation (Annex A-2)

    • Transfer geological data, slope morphometric, relative relief, land use/cover from topo maps.
    • Use aerial photos/satellite images to identify wet patches and land cover.
  3. Factorial Maps Preparation (Annex A-3)

    • Validate pre-field maps in the field.
    • Prepare:
      • Lithological map
      • Structural map
      • Slope morphometric map
      • Relative relief map
      • Land use/cover map
      • Hydrogeological map
    • Use stereonet plots for structural discontinuities and failure modes.
  4. Slope Morphometry Classification (Clause 6.3)

    Slope CategorySlope Angle (°)
    Very gentle slope≤ 15
    Gentle slope16 – 25
    Moderately steep slope26 – 35
    Steep slope36 – 45
    Escarpment/Cliff> 45
  5. Hazard Rating and Zonation (Clause 7.1)

    • Zones: VLH (Very Low Hazard), LH, MH, HH, VHH (Very High Hazard).
    • Detailed geotechnical investigations in MH, HH, VHH zones.
    • Assess hazard rating, failure modes (e.g., debris flow, toe erosion), damage potential.
  6. Revision of LHZ Map (Clause 9)

    • Update after major earthquakes (>5 Richter), floods, cyclones, mining, cloud bursts.

Procedure Flowchart (Simplified):

flowchart TD
    A[Acquire Topographic Maps 1:50000] --> B[Acquire Aerial Photos/Satellite Imageries]
    B --> C[Acquire Regional Geological Map]
    C --> D[Prepare Pre-field Geological Map]
    D
Annex BComposition of Technical Committee

Composition of Technical Committee (IS 14496 Part 2)

The Technical Committee responsible for this standard is the Hill Area Development Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 56. The detailed composition is given in Annex B and includes:

RoleRepresentative Organization
ChairmanDr. Gopal Ranjan, University of Roorkee
MembersPublic Works Dept. J&K, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, National Buildings Construction Corporation, Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Design Organization, Ministry of Surface Transport, Indian Roads Congress, Central Water Commission, Indian Meteorological Dept., Society for Integrated Development of Himalayas, Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Railways, Geological Survey of India, Army Headquarters, Sikkim Hill Area Development Board, Central Road Research Institute, Directorate General Border Roads, Central Mining Research Institute, University of Roorkee, Department of Science and Technology, National Institute of Hydrology, Structural Engineering Research Centre, HUDCO, and others

Alternates are nominated for many members ensuring continuity.


Key Notes:

  • The committee includes experts from government departments, research institutes, universities, and industry.
  • This multi-disciplinary composition ensures comprehensive coverage of hill area development and landslide hazard zonation.
  • Refer to Annex B of IS 14496 Part 2 for the full detailed list.

Related Reference Table (for geological symbols & maps):

IS No.Title
7422 (Part 1 to 5)Symbols and abbreviations for geological maps and features

This composition ensures expert inputs for landslide hazard zonation and hill area engineering standards.

Popular Questions About IS 14496 Part 2

?What are the primary causative factors considered in macro-zonation landslide hazard mapping?

Primary Causative Factors in Macro-Zonation Landslide Hazard Mapping (IS 14496 Part 2)

According to Clause 3.1, the key factors governing macro-zonation landslide hazard (LHZ) mapping are:

  • Lithology: Rock type and its weathering characteristics.
  • Structure: Geological discontinuities such as faults, joints, and bedding planes.
  • Slope Morphometry: Slope angle, shape, and length.
  • Relative Relief: Elevation differences influencing gravitational forces.
  • Land Use and Land Cover: Vegetation, urbanization, and surface conditions.
  • Hydrogeological Conditions: Groundwater presence, seepage, and wet patches.

These factors collectively influence slope stability and are mapped facet-wise to prepare factorial maps, which are then integrated into the LHZ map.


Summary Table of Factors

FactorRole in Instability
LithologyDetermines rock strength and weathering
StructureControls potential failure planes
Slope MorphometrySteeper slopes have higher failure risk
Relative ReliefInfluences gravitational driving forces
Land Use & CoverAffects surface runoff and root reinforcement
HydrogeologicalWater pressure reduces effective stress

Loading diagram...

This systematic approach ensures comprehensive hazard assessment for safer development planning.

?How is the Total Estimated Hazard Degree (TEHD) calculated for slope facets?

Calculation of Total Estimated Hazard Degree (TEHD) for Slope Facets (IS 14496 Part 2)

  • TEHD is calculated facet-wise because adjoining slope facets may have different stability.
  • For each slope facet, TEHD is the sum of ratings from individual causative factors based on the Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor (LHEF) rating scheme.
  • The causative factors include:
    • Lithology
    • Structure
    • Slope Morphometry
    • Relative Relief
    • Land Use and Land Cover
    • Hydrogeological Conditions

Formula:

[ \text{TEHD} = \sum \text{LHEF ratings of all causative factors for the facet} ]

Interpretation of TEHD values (Table 3):

ZoneTEHD ValueHazard Description
I< 3.5Very Low Hazard (VLH)
II3.5 – 5.0Low Hazard (LH)
III5.1 – 6.0Moderate Hazard (MH)
IV6.1 – 7.5High Hazard (HH)
V> 7.5Very High Hazard (VHH)

Summary

  • Delimit slope facets by natural boundaries (ridges, gullies, rivers).
  • Assign ratings for each factor per facet using LHEF.
  • Sum ratings to get TEHD.
  • Classify hazard zone based on TEHD value.
Loading diagram...
?What scales are recommended for preparing macro-zonation landslide hazard zonation maps?

Recommended Scales for Macro-Zonation Landslide Hazard Zonation Maps (IS 14496 Part 2):

  • Topographic Maps: 1:50,000
  • Aerial Photographs & Satellite Imageries: 1:50,000
  • Regional Geological, Lithological, Structural Maps: 1:50,000
  • Detailed Geotechnical Slope Mapping (for unstable zones): 1:1,000 to 1:2,000

Summary:

  • Macro-zonation mapping uses 1:50,000 scale for broad regional mapping and hazard evaluation.
  • For detailed slope instability assessment in High Hazard (HH) and Very High Hazard (VHH) zones, finer scales of 1:1,000 or 1:2,000 are recommended.
  • These scales help identify slope facets, structural discontinuities, and hazard factors effectively.
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures efficient hazard zoning and guides appropriate mitigation measures.

?How does land use and vegetation cover influence landslide hazard ratings in this standard?

Influence of Land Use and Vegetation Cover on Landslide Hazard Ratings (IS 14496 Part 2)

  • Land use and vegetation cover are indirect indicators of slope stability (Clause 4.2.5).
  • Vegetation effects:
    • Thick forest cover protects slopes by reducing weathering and erosion.
    • Root systems increase shear resistance, stabilizing the soil.
    • Sparse or barren areas have faster erosion and higher instability.
  • Agricultural lands are generally stable due to repeated artificial watering, usually on gentle slopes.
  • Hazard ratings based on vegetation intensity (Table 2, Clause 4.2):
Land Use / Vegetation CoverRating
Agricultural land / populated flat land0.6
Thickly vegetated forest area0.8
Moderately vegetated area1.2
Sparsely vegetated area with lesser ground cover1.5
Barren land2.0
  • In thickly populated areas, smaller facets are considered for detailed hazard evaluation.

This rating contributes up to 2.0 in the overall Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor (LHEF), reflecting the significant role of land cover in slope stability.

?What procedures are suggested for revising landslide hazard zonation maps after major natural events?

Revision Procedures for Landslide Hazard Zonation (LHZ) Maps after Major Natural Events (IS 14496 Part 2)

  • When to Revise:
    The LHZ maps must be revised after major natural events such as:

    • Earthquakes with magnitude > 5 (Richter scale)
    • Major floods, cyclones, cloud bursts
    • Significant developmental or mining activities
      These events can trigger new landslides affecting watershed stability.
  • Revision Approach:

    • Conduct field verification and mapping of new landslides and slope changes.
    • Update factorial maps (lithology, structure, slope morphology, hydrogeology, land use) based on fresh data.
    • Reassess hazard ratings considering new instabilities and failure modes (e.g., debris flow, toe erosion).
    • Use detailed mapping at scales 1:1000 or 1:2000 for unstable zones (HH, VHH).
    • Integrate satellite imagery/aerial photos for rapid detection of wet patches and slope changes.
  • Outcome:
    A revised LHZ map reflecting updated hazard zones to guide safer development and mitigation.

Loading diagram...

This ensures dynamic, risk-informed land use decisions in mountainous terrains.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 14496 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required