IS 14458 Part 21997AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Guidelines for retaining wall for hill area, Part 2: Design of retaining/breast walls

IS 14458 Part 2:1997 provides comprehensive guidelines for the design of retaining and breast walls specifically for hill areas. It addresses the structural design criteria, load considerations including seismic forces, foundation requirements, and drainage provisions to ensure slope stability and prevent erosion. This standard is essential for civil and structural engineers involved in designing retaining structures in hilly terrains to mitigate landslide risks and support road and building developments.

15Sections
77Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1997Edition
Hill Area Development EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 14458 Part 2 PDF, IS 14458 Part 2 pdf free download, IS 14458 Part 2 free download pdf, IS14458Part2 PDF, IS-14458-Part-2 PDF, IS 14458 Part 2 1997 PDF, IS 14458 Part 2:1997 PDF, IS 14458 Part 2-1997 PDF, IS 14458 Part 2 (1997) PDF, IS 14458 Part 2 1997 edition PDF, IS 14458 Part 2 edition 1997 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 14458 Part 2:1997 provides comprehensive guidelines for the design of retaining and breast walls specifically for hill areas. It addresses the structural design criteria, load considerations including seismic forces, foundation requirements, and drainage provisions to ensure slope stability and prevent erosion. This standard is essential for civil and structural engineers involved in designing retaining structures in hilly terrains to mitigate landslide risks and support road and building developments.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Civil Engineers
  • Structural Engineers
  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Hill Area Road Designers
  • Construction Project Managers
  • Urban Planners in Hilly Regions
  • Environmental Engineers

Key Topics Covered

Design criteria for retaining and breast walls
Load and earth pressure evaluation
Seismic force considerations
Foundation bearing capacity and soil characteristics
Wall geometry and batter recommendations
Drainage and water pressure management
Erosion control at wall toe
Material selection for masonry and concrete walls
Slope stability and safety factors
Construction guidelines for hill terrain
Stepping and dipping of wall foundations
Use of self-draining backfill materials

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 14458 Part 2: Scope & Key Design References

Scope Highlights (Clause 5.4):

  • Standard designs (Table 3) apply to retaining walls < 8 m height and < 120 m² area in low hazard zones.
  • Applicable only if allowable bearing capacity > max pressure from Table 3.

Key Design Data

ParameterNotesSource
Cohesion (c) & Friction (φ)Vary by backfill/foundation; use Table 2 for preliminary valuesClause 4.3, Table 2
Bearing CapacityMust exceed max pressure from Table 3Clause 5.4

Important Notes on Calculations

  • Round off results per IS 2:1960 rules, maintaining significant digits as per standard.
  • Experimental determination of soil parameters is preferred over preliminary values.

Summary Table Reference (Example)

Wall Height (m)Max Pressure (kPa)Max Area (m²)Hazard Zone
< 8See Table 3 values< 120Low hazard only

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Wall Design] --> B{Height < 8m?}
    B -- Yes --> C{Area < 120 m²?}
    C -- Yes --> D{Low hazard zone?}
    D -- Yes --> E[Use Table 3 standard design]
    D -- No --> F[Full design required]
    C -- No --> F
    B -- No --> F
    F --> G[Determine soil parameters (c, φ) experimentally or use Table 2]
    G --> H[Check bearing capacity > max pressure]
    H --> I[Design wall accordingly]

For detailed values, refer to Table 2 (soil parameters) and Table 3 (standard wall pressures) in IS 14458 Part 2.

2Referenced Indian Standards

IS 14458 Part 2 references multiple Indian Standards (listed in Annex A) that form integral provisions of this code. Key points:

  • Referenced Standards: Annex A lists all Indian Standards applicable; these are mandatory for compliance.
  • Edition Validity: Editions valid at publication time apply, but users should check for the latest versions.
  • Rounding Off: Use IS 2:1960 for rounding test or calculation results, matching the significant digits of specified values.

Commonly Referenced IS Codes (Examples)

IS CodeTitlePurpose
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced ConcreteDesign and construction rules
IS 875 (Part 1-5)Code of Practice for LoadsLoad calculations
IS 13920:2016Ductile Detailing of Reinforced ConcreteEarthquake-resistant detailing
IS 1893:2016Criteria for Earthquake Resistant DesignSeismic design

Rounding Off (IS 2:1960)

  • Round values to the same decimal places as the specified value.
  • Example: If specified value = 12.345, round test results to 3 decimals.
flowchart LR
    A[IS 14458 Part 2] --> B[Annex A: Referenced IS Codes]
    B --> C[Design Codes (IS 456, IS 875)]
    B --> D[Detailing Codes (IS 13920)]
    B --> E[Seismic Codes (IS 1893)]
    A --> F[IS 2:1960 Rounding Rules]

Always verify the latest editions of referenced standards for compliance.

3Types of Retaining Structures in Hill Areas

IS 14458 Part 2: Retaining Structures in Hill Areas

Types of Retaining Structures (Clause 3.1)

  • Breast Wall: A low retaining wall, often used to support soil at hill slopes.
  • Retaining Wall: Larger structures designed to hold back soil, typically gravity type.

Key Specifications

  • Backfill Top: Horizontal with surcharge of 1.5 t/m² (Clause 1.5).
  • Foundation: Wall dimensions must ensure allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure.
  • Protection:
    • 300 mm silty soil with boulders layer to prevent rainwater ingress.
    • Pitching at the toe to prevent erosion.
  • Slope: Recommended slope ranges from 1:5 to 1:3 for stability.

Design Considerations

  • Ensure the bearing capacity of soil supports the wall load.
  • Use gravity wall principles: weight of the wall resists lateral earth pressure.
  • Backfill should be compacted with proper drainage to reduce hydrostatic pressure.

Typical Gravity Wall Pressure Calculation

[ P = \frac{1}{2} \gamma H^2 K_a + q K_a H ]

Where:

  • (P) = lateral earth pressure
  • (\gamma) = unit weight of soil
  • (H) = height of wall
  • (K_a) = active earth pressure coefficient
  • (q) = surcharge load (1.5 t/m²)

flowchart TD
    A[Hill Slope] --> B[Breast Wall]
    A --> C[Retaining Wall]
    B --> D[Supports Soil]
    C --> E[Resists Earth Pressure]
    E --> F[Foundation Bearing Capacity Check]
    F --> G[Backfill with Surcharge 1.5 t/m²]
    G --> H[Drainage and Pitching]

Summary: Use breast or retaining walls with proper foundation and backfill, maintain slope 1:5 to 1:3, and protect against water ingress and erosion per IS 14458 Part 2 guidelines.

4Bearing Capacity

IS 14458 Part 2: Bearing Capacity Key Points

1. Allowable Bearing Capacity (Clause 4.1)

  • Calculated per IS 6403 using soil test data.
  • For non-erodible rocks:
    • Tight joints: max bearing = ½ × unconfined compressive strength (qu)
    • Open joints: max bearing = ⅒ × qu
  • For weak/closely jointed rocks, assess by visual and lab tests.
  • In absence of soil data, use Table 1 values for preliminary design.
  • Rocks bearing capacity per IS 12070.
  • Use gabion walls for erodible/weak soils to tolerate settlements.

2. Safe Bearing Capacity Values (Table 1)

Soil Type & SymbolConsistencySafe Bearing Capacity (kN/m²)
Well graded mixture (GW, GC, SC)Very compact100
Gravel mixtures (GW, GP, SW, SP)Very compact80
Gravel mixturesMedium to compact60
Gravel mixturesLoose40
Coarse to medium sand (SW, SP)Very compact40
Coarse to medium sandMedium to compact30
Coarse to medium sandLoose30
Fine to medium sand (SW, SM, SC)Very compact30
Fine to medium sandMedium to compact25
Fine to medium sandLoose15
Fine sand, silty/clayey (SP, SM, SC)Very compact30
Fine sand, silty/clayeyMedium to compact20
Fine sand, silty/clayeyLoose15
Homogeneous inorganic clay (CL, CH)Very stiff to hard40
Homogeneous inorganic clayMedium to stiff20
Homogeneous inorganic claySoft5
Inorganic silt (ML, MH)Very stiff to hard30
Inorganic siltMedium to stiff15
Inorganic siltSoft5

3. Preliminary Cohesion (c) and Friction Angle (φ) (Clause 4.

5Design Criteria

IS 14458 Part 2: Design Criteria Key Points


Forces to Consider (Clause 5.1.1)

  • Self-weight of retaining structure
  • Live and imposed loads (IS 875 Parts 1-5)
  • Earth pressure on wall (IS 1893 for seismic)
  • Water pressure from water table/seepage (minimum 30% always considered)
  • Seismic forces (except low volume roads)
  • Special loads, if any

Soil Strength Characteristics (Table 2, Clause 4.3)

Soil TypeCohesion c (t/m²)Effective Friction Angle Φ' (°)tan Φ'
GW, GP0>37>0.74
SM0.5340.67
SC0.75310.60
CL0.9280.54
CH1.0190.35

Use experimental values or Table 2 for preliminary design.


Bearing Capacity (Clause 4.1 & Table 1)

Soil Type & ConsistencySafe Bearing Capacity (t/m²)
Well-graded, very compact100
Gravel, medium to compact60
Coarse to medium sand, loose30
Clay, very stiff to hard40
Silt, medium to stiff15

Refer IS 6403 for detailed bearing capacity calculations.


Earth Pressure & Loads

  • Earth pressure per IS 1893.
  • Live load on wall top: 250 to 500 kg/m².
  • Water pressure: consider ≥30% even if drainage provided.
  • Seismic forces as per IS 1893.
  • For roads, surcharge per IRC codes.

Summary Formula for Earth Pressure (Rankine's Approximation):

[ P_a = \frac{1}{2} \gamma H^2 K_a - 2c \sqrt{K_a}

6Design of Retaining and Breast Walls

IS 14458 Part 2 provides guidelines for the design of retaining and breast walls, focusing on stability and earth pressure reduction.


Key Specifications & Recommendations

  • Negative Batter on Breast Wall Backside (Clause 6.4):

    • Recommended negative batter: up to 1:3 (horizontal:vertical)
    • Effect: Significantly reduces earth pressure on cut slopes.
    • Condition: Effective if founded on rock or firm natural ground.
  • Design Approach (Clause 5.2):

    • Retaining and breast walls are designed as rigid walls considering earth pressure and stability.

Standard Dimensions & Foundation Pressures (Table 3 Extract)

Back Fill TypeWall Height (m)Top Width (m) Cement MasonryBase Width (m) Cement MasonryFoundation Pressure (t/m²) Cement Masonry
Good Back-fill30.65 - 0.701.91 - 2.0113 - 14
60.75 - 1.003.9220 - 25
101.008.41 - 13.5713 - 40
Fair Back-fill30.60 - 0.751.81 - 2.1113 - 15
60.90 - 1.004.1220 - 25
101.004.88 - 9.9020 - 39

Similar values apply for Dry Stone Masonry with slight variations.


Common Design Formulae

  • Active Earth Pressure (Rankine):
    [ P_a = \frac{1}{2} \gamma H^2 K_a ] Where:
    • ( \gamma ) = Unit weight of backfill soil
    • ( H ) = Height of wall
    • ( K_a
6.1Depth of Walls

Depth of Walls (IS 14458 Part 2: Clause 6.1 & 6.4)

  • Minimum Depth Below Ground/Terrace Level:
    500 mm below side drain in soil or highly jointed rock.
    Foundation must rest on natural firm ground or firm rock for multiple breast walls.

  • Negative Batter for Breast Walls (Clause 6.4):

    • Recommended negative batter: 1:3 (Horizontal:Vertical) on cut-slope side.
    • Reduces earth pressure, allowing nominal section breast walls to stabilize slopes.

Key Specifications from Table 3 (Clause 5.4)

Backfill TypeWall Height (m)Top Width (m) Cement MasonryBase Width (m) Cement MasonryFoundation Pressure (t/m²)
Good Back-fill30.65 - 0.701.91 - 2.0113 - 14
Good Back-fill60.753.9220 - 25
Fair Back-fill30.60 - 0.751.81 - 2.1113 - 15
Poor Back-fill81.006.49 - 7.8920 - 22
  • Note: Design walls less than 8 m height and 120 m² area can adopt these standard dimensions if bearing capacity > foundation pressure.

Additional Design Notes

  • Backfill top: Horizontal with 1.5 t/m² surcharge (Clause 1.5).
  • Select wall dimensions so that allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure.
  • Use 300 mm silty soil with boulders layer to prevent rainwater ingress.
  • Provide pitching to prevent toe erosion with slope between 1:5 to 1:3.

graph LR
A[Foundation on Firm Ground] --> B[Minimum Depth 500mm below drain]
B --> C[Retaining / Breast Wall]
C --> D[Negative Batter 1:
6.2Stepping of Base of Wall on Rock Slope

Stepping of Base of Wall on Rock Slope (IS 14458 Part 2, Clause 6.2)

  • Foundation Stepping:
    Foundation on rock slope shall be stepped as per Fig. 2 (not shown here). Steps follow the rock slope contour to ensure stability and reduce sliding.

  • Slope Consideration:
    For steep slopes > 35°, use retaining walls with:

    • Front face nearly vertical
    • Back face inclined
      This reduces wall height and earth pressure.
  • Backfill & Drainage:
    Use self-draining backfill to avoid hydrostatic pressure buildup.

  • Foundation Design:
    Ensure foundation pressure < allowable bearing capacity of rock.
    Typical surcharge on backfill top: 1.5 t/m² (Clause 1.5).

  • Slope of Steps:
    Recommended slope of stepping: 1 in 5 to 1 in 3 (Fig. 3).


Key Specifications Summary

ParameterValue/Specification
Backfill surcharge1.5 t/m² (horizontal top)
Stepping slope1:5 to 1:3
Back face batter (negative)Up to 1:3 (horizontal:vertical)
Backfill typeSelf-draining recommended
Foundation pressureLess than allowable bearing capacity of rock

Typical Design Considerations (from Table 3)

Wall Height (m)Top Width (m)Base Width (m)Foundation Pressure (t/m²)
30.65 - 0.701.9 - 2.011 - 14
60.75 - 1.03.9 - 4.520 - 25
80.80 - 1.05.2 - 6.517 - 33
100.90 - 1.06.6 - 10.920 - 40

6.3Dip of the Base of Wall Towards Hillside

Dip of the Base of Wall Towards Hillside (IS 14458 Part 2, Clause 6.3)

  • Recommended Dip Ratio: 3 (horizontal) : 1 (vertical) towards the hillside.
  • Purpose: Improves seismic performance and significantly increases factor of safety against sliding.
  • Effect: Economical design by reducing sliding forces and foundation pressure.

Key Specifications:

ParameterValue/Description
Dip of base towards hillside3:1 (Horizontal : Vertical)
Backfill topHorizontal with surcharge of 1.5 t/m²
Soil layer on wall base300 mm silty soil with boulders (rainwater ingress prevention)
Pitching slope1 in 5 to 1 in 3 (to prevent toe erosion)

Design Considerations:

  • Ensure allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure.
  • For rock slopes (steep >35°), use stepped foundation (Fig. 2) with vertical front face and inclined back face.
  • Use self-draining backfill to avoid hydrostatic pressure buildup.

Visual Concept (Simplified):

graph LR
A[Base of Wall] -->|Dip 3:1 towards hillside| B[Hillside Slope]
B --> C[Backfill (Horizontal + 1.5 t/m² surcharge)]
C --> D[Pitching (1 in 5 to 1 in 3 slope)]
D --> E[300 mm Silty Soil Layer + Boulders]

Summary:
Adopt a 3:1 dip of the base towards hillside for seismic safety and sliding resistance, combined with proper backfill and pitching as per IS 14458 Part 2 guidelines.

6.4Negative Batter of Backside of Breast Wall

Negative Batter of Backside of Breast Wall (IS 14458 Part 2, Clause 6.4)

  • Definition: Breast wall with negative batter means the back face (cut-slope side) slopes inward, reducing earth pressure.
  • Recommended Batter: Up to 1:3 (horizontal:vertical) — i.e., for every 3 units vertical, 1 unit horizontal inward slope.
  • Effect: Significantly reduces earth pressure, allowing even a nominal section to stabilize slopes if founded on firm ground or rock.

Key Specifications from Table 6.4 & Table 3 (Standard Design)

ParameterCement Masonry Retaining WallDry Stone Masonry Retaining Wall
Top width (m)0.65 to 1.00 (depending on height & backfill)0.70 to 1.00
Base width (m)1.81 to 13.57 (depends on height & drainage)2.01 to 14.58
Foundation pressure (t/m²)13 to 40 (varies with soil type & drainage)11 to 36
  • Backfill types: Good, Fair, Poor; drainage conditions: Full drainage, low/high pore water pressure.
  • Wall heights considered: 3m, 6m, 8m, 10m.

Design Notes:

  • Ensure breast wall foundation is on rock or firm natural ground.
  • Use negative batter to reduce earth pressure and improve stability.
  • Refer to Table 3 for exact dimensions based on soil and drainage conditions.

Visual Concept of Negative Batter:

graph LR
    A[Cut Slope]
    B[Breast Wall]
    C[Backfill]
    A -->|Slope| B
    B -->|Negative Batter 1:3| C
    style B fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

Summary:
Use a negative batter of 1:3 on the backside of breast walls to reduce earth pressure, enabling economical design. Refer to IS 14458 Part 2 tables for sizing based on soil, drainage, and wall height.

6.5Drainage Plan

IS 14458 Part 2 (1997) – Drainage Plan Key Points

1. Drainage Layer & Protection

  • Provide a 300 mm layer of silty soil with boulders below or behind retaining walls to prevent rainwater ingress.
  • Use pitching (stone masonry) at the toe of the wall to prevent erosion.

2. Slope Specifications

  • Adopt slopes between 1:5 to 1:3 for terraces and drainage paths to ensure controlled runoff.

3. Backfill & Surcharge

  • Backfill should be horizontal with a surcharge of 1.5 t/m² (Clause 1.5).
  • Ensure backfill material is well-drained to reduce hydrostatic pressure.

4. Wall Dimensions & Foundation Pressure

  • Select wall dimensions so that allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure (Clause 1.5).
  • Use soil bearing capacity tables from IS 6403 or relevant codes for foundation design.

Typical Drainage Plan Components:

ComponentSpecification
Drainage Layer300 mm silty soil + boulders
Slope Gradient1:5 to 1:3
Backfill Surcharge1.5 t/m²
Toe ProtectionStone pitching

flowchart LR
    Rainwater --> DrainageLayer[300 mm Silty Soil + Boulders]
    DrainageLayer --> DrainageSlope[Slope 1:5 to 1:3]
    DrainageSlope --> ToeProtection[Stone Pitching]
    Backfill[Backfill with surcharge 1.5 t/m²] --> DrainageLayer
    WallDimensions --> FoundationPressure[Allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure]

Summary: The drainage plan per IS 14458 Part 2 ensures protection against water ingress and erosion by layering silty soil with boulders, maintaining proper slope, and protecting the toe with pitching, while designing walls for safe foundation pressure.

6.6Erosion Control of Toe of Retaining Walls

Erosion Control of Toe of Retaining Walls (IS 14458 Part 2:1997)

Key Specifications:

  • Toe Protection Layer:

    • 300 mm thick layer of silty soil with boulders to prevent ingress of rainwater.
  • Pitching:

    • Provide pitching at the toe to prevent erosion.
  • Slope:

    • Toe slope should be between 1:5 to 1:3 (vertical:horizontal).
  • Backfill Top:

    • Horizontal backfill with surcharge of 1.5 t/m².
  • Bearing Capacity:

    • Select wall dimensions so that allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure.

Forces to Consider in Design (Clause 5.1.1):

  • Self-weight of retaining structure
  • Live and imposed loads (250–500 kg/m² on top width)
  • Earth pressure (active/passive)
  • Water pressure (including toe side)
  • Seismic forces (per IS 1893)
  • Special loads if applicable

Soil Strength Parameters (Typical Values from Table 2):

Soil GroupCohesion, c (t/m²)Effective Friction Angle, ϕ' (°)tan ϕ'
GW, GP0>37>0.74
SM0.5340.67
CL0.9280.54
CH1.0190.35

Important Formula for Earth Pressure (Rankine's Active Earth Pressure):

[ P_a = \frac{1}{2} \gamma H^2 K_a - 2c \sqrt{K_a} H ]

Where:

  • (P_a) = active earth pressure
  • (\gamma) = unit weight of soil
  • (H) = height of wall
  • (c) = cohesion
  • (K_a = \tan^2(45^\circ - \frac{\phi}{2})) = active earth pressure coefficient

Toe Erosion Control Summary:

flowchart LR
    A[Rainwater] --> B
7Safety Factors and Stability Requirements

IS 14458 Part 2: Safety Factors & Stability Requirements

Key Safety Factors

  • Against Sliding:
    • Static loads: > 1.5
    • Earthquake forces: > 1.0
  • Against Overturning:
    • Static loads: > 2.0
  • Slip Surface (steep hills):
    • Static: > 1.5
    • Seismic: > 1.0

Note: Live and imposed loads aiding stability are excluded from safety factor calculations.

Bearing Capacity

  • Maximum base pressure ≤ allowable bearing capacity ( q_a )
  • Calculated per IS 6403 based on soil tests.
  • For non-erodible rock:
    • Tight joints: ≤ 0.5 × unconfined compressive strength
    • Open joints: ≤ 0.1 × unconfined compressive strength
  • For weak/erodible soils, prefer gabion walls.

Table 1: Safe Bearing Capacities (kN/m²)

Soil Type & ConsistencySymbol(s)Safe Bearing Capacity (kN/m²)
Well graded mixture, very compactGW, GC, SC100
Gravel mixtures, very compactGW, GP, SW, SP80
Gravel mixtures, medium to compactSW, SP60
Gravel mixtures, loose40
Coarse-medium sand, very compactSW, SP40
Coarse-medium sand, medium to compact30
Coarse-medium sand, loose30
Fine-medium sand, very compactSW, SM, SC30
Fine-medium sand, medium to compact25
Fine-medium sand, loose15
Homogeneous clay, very stiff to hardCL, CH40
Homogeneous clay, medium to stiff20
Homogeneous clay, soft5
Inorganic silt, very stiff to hardML, MH
8Load Considerations

IS 14458 Part 2 — Load Considerations for Retaining Walls

1. Allowable Bearing Capacity (Clause 4.1)

  • Calculated per IS 6403 using soil test data.
  • For non-erodible rocks:
    • Tight joints: ≤ 0.5 × unconfined compressive strength.
    • Open joints: ≤ 0.1 × unconfined compressive strength.
  • In absence of soil data, use Table 1 (Safe Bearing Capacities):
Soil Type & ConsistencySafe Bearing Capacity (t/m²)
Well graded, very compact100
Gravel mixtures, very compact80
Gravel mixtures, medium to compact60
Gravel mixtures, loose40
Coarse to medium sand, very compact40
Coarse to medium sand, medium30
Fine sand & clays, very stiff to hard40
Soft clay or silt5

2. Design Loads (Clause 5.1.1)

  • Consider:
    • Self-weight of structure
    • Live and imposed loads (250–500 kg/m² on top width per IS 875)
    • Earth pressure (IRC & IS 1893 for seismic)
    • Water pressure (minimum 30% even with drainage)
    • Seismic forces (if applicable)
    • Special loads

3. Safety Factors (Clause 2.0 & 1.5)

  • Against overturning: > 2.0 (static)
  • Against sliding: > 1.5 (static), > 1.0 (with earthquake)
  • With earthquake: overall factor of safety > 1.5

4. Soil Strength Parameters (Table 2)

Soil GroupCohesion c (t/m²)Effective Friction Angle Φ' (°)tan Φ'
GW, GP, SW, SP0> 37> 0.74
SM, SC, ML, CL0.5 to 0.9
Annex AList of Referred Indian Standards

IS 14458 Part 2 references several Indian Standards essential for structural design and construction, but the standard itself does not list formulas or tables directly. Instead, it refers to other IS codes for detailed provisions.

Key Points on Referred Indian Standards:

  • Annex A of IS 14458 Part 2 lists all referenced IS codes.
  • These referenced standards provide design formulas, material specifications, and construction practices.
  • Users should consult the latest editions of these IS codes for updated provisions.

Commonly Referred IS Codes in Structural Engineering:

IS CodeTitleUse Case
IS 456Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced ConcreteConcrete design and detailing
IS 800General Construction in Steel — Code of PracticeSteel structures design
IS 875 (Part 1-5)Code of Practice for Design Loads (Dead, Live, Wind, Earthquake)Load calculations
IS 1893Criteria for Earthquake Resistant DesignSeismic design
IS 13920Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete StructuresEarthquake resistant detailing

Example: Basic Load Combination (from IS 875)

[ \text{Design Load} = 1.5 \times \text{Dead Load} + 1.5 \times \text{Live Load} ]

Recommendation:

  • Always verify the latest edition of each referred IS code.
  • Use the tables and formulas within those IS codes for detailed design.
flowchart LR
    A[IS 14458 Part 2] --> B[Annex A: List of Referred IS Codes]
    B --> C[IS 456 - Concrete Design]
    B --> D[IS 800 - Steel Design]
    B --> E[IS 875 - Loads]
    B --> F[IS 1893 - Earthquake Design]
    B --> G[IS 13920 - Ductile Detailing]

Summary: IS 14458 Part 2 acts as a referencing document; detailed formulas and tables are found in the referred IS codes listed in Annex A.

Popular Questions About IS 14458 Part 2

?What are the recommended safety factors for retaining walls in hill areas according to IS 14458 Part 2?

According to IS 14458 Part 2 (1997) for retaining walls in hill areas:

  • Factor of Safety (FoS) for slip surface below foundation:

    • Static conditions: > 1.5
    • Seismic conditions: > 1.0
  • Design considerations:

    • Foundations must comply with IS 1080 and IS 1904.
    • Select wall dimensions so that allowable bearing capacity > foundation pressure.
    • Backfill top is horizontal with a surcharge of 1.5 t/m².
    • Use a 300 mm layer of silty soil with boulders to prevent rainwater ingress.
    • Provide pitching to prevent toe erosion.
    • Recommended slope ranges from 1:5 to 1:3.

These safety factors ensure stability against sliding and seismic forces typical in steep hill conditions.

Loading diagram...

This summarizes the key safety factors and design guidelines for hill retaining walls per IS 14458 Part 2.

?How does the standard address seismic forces in the design of retaining walls?

IS 14458 Part 2 addresses seismic forces in retaining wall design as follows:

  • Seismic forces must be considered along with self-weight, live loads, earth pressure, water pressure, and special loads (Clause 5.1.1(f)).
  • Earth pressures and seismic forces should be estimated per IS 1893 (Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design).
  • For low volume roads, seismic design may be omitted.
  • For roads, earth pressure due to surcharge follows IRC codes.
  • The factor of safety against slip below foundation should be:
    • ≥ 1.5 under static conditions
    • ≥ 1.0 under seismic conditions (Clause 1.5)
  • Water pressure consideration: at least 30% of full water pressure must be considered even if drainage is provided.
  • Foundation design must comply with IS 1080 and IS 1904.

Summary Table

ParameterRequirement
Seismic forcesAs per IS 1893
Factor of safety (slip surface)≥ 1.5 static, ≥ 1.0 seismic
Water pressure≥ 30% full pressure considered
Foundation designIS 1080 & IS 1904 compliant
Low volume roadsSeismic forces may be neglected

This ensures retaining walls are stable under earthquake loading with adequate safety margins.

?What types of soil and foundation bearing capacities are considered in this standard?

IS 14458 Part 2 considers the following soil types and foundation bearing capacities for retaining structures:

Types of Soil & Recommended Safe Bearing Capacities (kN/m²)

Soil Type & SymbolConsistencySafe Bearing Capacity (kN/m²)
Well-graded mixture (GW-GC, GC, SC)Very compact100
Gravel & gravel-sand mixtures (GW, GP)Very compact80
Gravel & gravel-sand mixtures (SW, SP)Medium to compact60
Gravel & gravel-sand mixtures (SW, SP)Loose40
Coarse to medium sand (SW, SP)Very compact40
Coarse to medium sand (SW, SP)Medium to compact30
Coarse to medium sand (SW, SP)Loose30
Fine to medium sand, silty/clayey (SW, SM, SC)Very compact30
Fine to medium sand, silty/clayey (SW, SM, SC)Medium to compact25
Fine to medium sand, silty/clayey (SW, SM, SC)Loose15
Fine sand, silty/clayey (SP, SM, SC)Very compact30
Fine sand, silty/clayey (SP, SM, SC)Medium to compact20
Fine sand, silty/clayey (SP, SM, SC)Loose15
Homogeneous inorganic clay (CL, CH)Very stiff to hard40
Homogeneous inorganic clay (CL, CH)Medium to stiff20
Homogeneous inorganic clay (CL, CH)Soft5
Inorganic silt (ML, MH)Very stiff to hard30
Inorganic silt (ML, MH)Medium to stiff15
Inorganic silt (ML, MH)Soft5

Additional

?What drainage provisions are required to manage water pressure behind retaining walls?

Drainage Provisions Behind Retaining Walls (IS 14458 Part 2)

  • Inverted Filter (Clause 6.5.1):
    Provide an inverted filter layer behind the retaining wall to drain groundwater or rainwater seepage efficiently, preventing hydrostatic pressure buildup.

  • Weep Holes & Catch Water Drains (Clause 6.5.5):

    • Avoid catch water drains near the top of breast walls to prevent seepage into cut slopes.
    • Provide catch water drains at the toe of the breast wall to collect water from weep holes and surface runoff, ensuring proper drainage.
  • Additional Measures:

    • Use a 300 mm silty soil layer with boulders to prevent rainwater ingress.
    • Provide pitching at the toe to prevent erosion.
    • Maintain slope between 1:5 to 1:3 for surface water runoff.
  • Foundation Depth (Clause 6.1):
    Retaining walls should extend at least 500 mm below side drains into firm ground to ensure stability.


Summary Diagram of Drainage Setup

Loading diagram...

Key: Proper drainage behind retaining walls reduces water pressure, enhancing stability and durability.

?How should erosion at the toe of retaining walls be controlled in hilly terrain?

To control erosion at the toe of retaining walls in hilly terrain as per IS 14458 Part 2 and good engineering practice:

  • Divert natural gullies and surface runoff away from the retaining wall base to prevent concentrated flow causing erosion (Clause 6.5.4).
  • Provide grass turfing or vegetation cover on slopes adjacent to the wall to stabilize soil and reduce surface erosion.
  • Design stepped foundations on rock slopes (Clause 6.2) to reduce soil displacement and improve stability.
  • Use energy dissipators or riprap at the toe where water flow is expected to reduce velocity and scouring.
  • Ensure self-draining backfill to avoid water pressure build-up that can exacerbate erosion.

Summary Table for Toe Erosion Control

MethodPurpose
Gully diversionAvoid concentrated runoff
Grass turfing/vegetationSoil stabilization
Stepped foundationReduce soil displacement
Riprap/energy dissipatorsReduce water velocity and scouring
Self-draining backfillPrevent hydrostatic pressure
Loading diagram...

This integrated approach minimizes toe erosion and enhances retaining wall durability in hilly areas.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 14458 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required