IS 13935:2009 provides comprehensive guidelines for the seismic evaluation, repair, and strengthening of masonry buildings in India. It applies to engineers and professionals involved in assessing earthquake damage, retrofitting, and restoring structural integrity of masonry structures, including important public and residential buildings. The standard covers damage assessment, repair techniques such as grout injection and mesh reinforcement, seismic belt construction, and methods to improve building resilience against seismic hazards.
Overview
IS 13935:2009 provides comprehensive guidelines for the seismic evaluation, repair, and strengthening of masonry buildings in India. It applies to engineers and professionals involved in assessing earthquake damage, retrofitting, and restoring structural integrity of masonry structures, including important public and residential buildings. The standard covers damage assessment, repair techniques such as grout injection and mesh reinforcement, seismic belt construction, and methods to improve building resilience against seismic hazards.
Audience
Contents
Structure
IS 13935: Scope Summary & Key References
Scope (Clause 1.4):
Referenced Standards:
| IS No. | Title |
|---|---|
| 1893 (Part 1): 2002 | Criteria for earthquake design of structures |
| 4326 : 1993 | Earthquake resistant design & construction of buildings |
| 13828 : 1993 | Improving earthquake resistance of low strength masonry buildings |
Key Notes:
| Element | Reinforcement Location | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal Seismic Bands | At plinth, lintel, eaves levels | To tie walls and improve ductility |
| Vertical Seismic Bars | At corners, junctions, jambs | To resist vertical seismic forces |
flowchart TD
A[IS 13935 Scope] --> B[Reinforcement per IS 4326]
A --> C[Special analysis for large spans/heights]
B --> D[Horizontal seismic bands]
B --> E[Vertical seismic bars]
A --> F[Reference IS Codes]
F --> G[IS 1893 (Part 1)]
F --> H[IS 4326]
F --> I[IS 13828]
Summary: IS 13935 guides seismic reinforcement referencing IS 4326, with special provisions for atypical buildings, and aligns with IS 1893 for earthquake design criteria.
IS 13935: Occupancy and Importance Classification Summary
| Occupancy Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Important Buildings | Hospitals, Schools, Monuments, Emergency buildings (telephone exchange, TV/radio stations, railway/fire stations), Large community halls (cinemas, assembly halls, subways), Power stations, Important industrial establishments, VIP residences, Residences of important emergency personnel. |
| Ordinary Buildings | Buildings with occupants < 100, not classified as important. |
Any building with more than 100 occupants may be treated as Important.
| Zone | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone Factor (Z) | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.36 |
[ F = I \times Z \times S_a \times W ] Where:
flowchart TD
A[Building Occupancy] -->|>100 occupants| B[Important Building (I=1.5)]
A -->|<100 occupants| C[Ordinary Building (I=1.0)]
B & C --> D[Calculate Seismic Force: F = I × Z × Sa × W]
D --> E[Design Structure for Seismic Loads]
Summary:
Use I=1.5 for important buildings to increase seismic design forces by 50%. Classify occupancy based on occupant count and building function as per Clause
IS 13935: Seismic Hazard and Site Conditions - Key Points
| Parameter | Condition/Threshold |
|---|---|
| High Water Table Depth | Within 5 m |
| Soil Type | Sandy soil (liquefiable if high water) |
| Occupancy | >100 occupants = Important Building |
| Vertical Irregularity Check | (K_i < 0.8 (K_{i+1} + K_{i+2} + K_{i+3})) |
| Plan Irregularity | Severe (Yes/No) |
| Falling Hazards | Chimneys, parapets, cladding |
flowchart TD
A[Building] --> B[Check Occup
IS 13935 Key Points on Falling Hazards & Non-Structural Components
Common falling hazards include:
[ F = C_s \times W ]
Where:
flowchart TD
A[Building Occupancy] --> B[Identify Falling Hazards]
B --> C{Hazard Type}
C -->|Chimneys| D[Secure Anchors]
C -->|Parapets| D
C -->|Cladding| D
C -->|Others| D
D --> E[Design for Seismic Forces]
E --> F[Inspection & Maintenance]
Summary: IS 13935 emphasizes identifying falling hazards (chimneys, parapets, cladding) especially in important buildings and seismic zones IV & V, with recommendations for anchorage and reporting in survey documents.
Damageability Assessment of Masonry Buildings — IS 13935 Key Points
| Grade | Damageability Description | Retrofitting Actions |
|---|---|---|
| G1 | Minor/no damage | No retrofitting needed |
| G2 | Minor structural damage, unstable non-structural elements | Stabilize non-structural elements |
| G3 | Moderate damage | Structural + non-structural retrofitting; evaluate global & element deficiencies |
| G4 | Severe damage | Structural + non-structural retrofitting; consider replacement for old buildings |
| G5 | Very severe damage | Retrofits or replacement with new earthquake-resistant building |
Note: For G4 & G5, aim for non-collapse performance only, especially in Seismic Zones IV & V.
| Building Type | Zone III Damage Grade | Zone IV Damage Grade (Important Building) |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Masonry | G4/G3 | G3/G2 |
flowchart TD
A[Start: Visual Screening] --> B{Damage Grade?}
B -->|G1| C[No Retrofitting]
B -->|G2| D[Stabilize Non-structural Elements]
B -->|G3| E[Structural + Non-structural Retrofitting]
IS 13935: Structural Repair Techniques - Key Points
flowchart TD
A[Surface Preparation] --> B[Epoxy Primer Application]
B --> C[FRP Sheet/Plate Placement]
C --> D[Epoxy Saturation & Curing]
D --> E[Final Inspection & Testing]
| Crack Type | Repair Method | Material Used |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Cracks | Epoxy Injection | Epoxy Resin |
| Medium Cracks | Routing & Sealing/Stitching | Cementitious Grout/Steel Bars |
| Structural Strengthening | FRP Bonding | FRP Sheets + Epoxy |
For detailed design and application, refer to IS 13935 clauses and relevant epoxy/FRP manufacturer guidelines.
IS 13935: Evaluation of Building Irregularities - Key Points
Plan Irregularities (Table 4):
Vertical Irregularities (Table 5):
Buildings with these irregularities require detailed seismic evaluation.
| Type | Zone II (MSK VI) | Zone III (MSK VII) | Zone IV (MSK VIII) | Zone V (MSK IX+) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A, A+ | Many Grade 1, Few Grade 2 | Most Grade 3, Few Grade 4 | Most Grade 4, Few Grade 5 | Many Grade 5, Rest Grade 4 |
| B, B+ | Few Grade 1, Rest No Damage | Many Grade 2, Few Grade 3 | Most Grade 3, Few Grade 4 | Many Grade 4, Few Grade 5 |
| C, C+ | Few Grade 1, Rest No Damage | Many Grade 1, Few Grade 2 | Most Grade 2, Few Grade 3 | Many Grade 3, Few Grade 4 |
| D | — | Few Grade 1 | Few Grade 2 | Many Grade 2, Few Grade 3 |
IS 13935: Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) for Seismic Hazards – Key Points
| Zone | Seismic Hazard | Max Damage (MSK Intensity) |
|---|---|---|
| II | Low | VI or lower |
| III | Moderate | VII |
| IV | High | VIII |
| V | Very High | IX or greater |
| Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| A | Highest vulnerability | Rubble stone in mud, mud/adobe walls |
| A+ | Slightly better than A | Adobe single storey, rammed earth |
| B, B+ | (Not detailed here, but less vulnerable than A types) |
Foundation Soil Factor (Ki) for vulnerability check:
[ K
IS 13935: Strengthening Methods for Masonry Walls and Openings
| Building Category | Mesh Gauge | Vertical Wires | Wire Spacing | Belt Width |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D & E | 10 or 13 | 8 (gauge 10) or as per gauge 13 | 25 mm | 200-250 mm |
| C | 13 | 10 | 25 mm | 250 mm |
| Parameter | Requirement / Action |
|---|---|
| Max opening ratio (b1+b2)/l | 0.5 (3-storey), 0.42 (4-storey) in seismic zones |
| Minimum jamb width (b4) | 340 mm (B), 450-560 mm (C, D, E) |
IS 13935: Seismic Belts Around Openings – Key Specifications
flowchart LR
A[Wall] --> B[Seismic Belt Above Lintel]
A --> C[Seismic Belt Below Floor/Roof]
A --> D[Seismic Belt at Eave Level]
B --> E[Longitudinal wires @ 25 mm spacing]
B --> F[Transverse wires @ ≤150 mm spacing]
E & F --> G[Galvanized Mesh in Micro-concrete]
Summary: Provide galvanized wire mesh seismic belts just above openings and below roofs, with specified wire gauges and spacing, ensuring enhanced earthquake resistance.
Achieving Integral Box Action (IS 13935 - Clause 11)
Integral box action improves lateral strength and stability of bearing wall buildings by ensuring walls act as a unified shear-resisting box.
| Category | Storeys | Vertical Bar Dia (mm) | Mesh Gauge | Mesh Width (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 1 | 10 | 10 | 300 |
| E | 3 (bottom) | 16 | 25 | 650 |
graph LR
A[Walls] --> B[Horizontal Bands (RC Ring Beams)]
A --> C[Vertical Reinforcement at Corners]
B & C --> D[Integral Box Action]
D --> E[Lateral Strength & Stability]
Summary:
Integral box action is achieved by combining horizontal RC bands, vertical reinforcement at critical locations, and proper connection of walls to form a rigid box resisting lateral loads effectively.
IS 13935 - Modifications of Roofs and Floors (Clause 12.5)
Prefabricated units (RC T or channel, wooden poles & joists):
Integration is essential to ensure structural continuity.
Timber elements:
Connected by diagonal planks nailed and spiked to an all-round wooden frame at ends.
Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements:
| Storeys | Category B (Single Bar mm) | Category C (Single Bar mm) | Category D (Single Bar mm) | Category E (Single Bar mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One | - | - | 10 | 12 |
| Two (Bottom) | - | 12 | 12 | 16 |
| Three (Bottom) | - | 12 | 12 | 16 |
Bars spacing typically 300-650 mm depending on category and storey.
flowchart LR
A[Prefabricated RC Unit] --> B[Ends Embedded in RC Ring Beam]
A --> C[40 mm Cast-in-situ Concrete Topping]
C --> D[6 mm dia Bars @ 150 mm c/c both ways]
E[Wooden Poles & Joists] --> F[Diagonal Planks Nailed]
F --> G[Spiked to Wooden Frame at Ends]
Use these guidelines to ensure proper load transfer and structural integrity when modifying roofs or floors with prefabricated or timber elements.
IS 13935: Use of Advanced Materials in Repair and Strengthening
For cracks >5 mm or crushed concrete:
| Material | Strength (MPa) | Special Features |
|---|---|---|
| Expansive Cement Mortar | 30-40 | Non-shrinkage, quick set |
| FRP Plates | 500-1500 | High tensile strength, corrosion resistant |
| Steel Mesh | 250-500 | Provides flexural/shear support |
flowchart TD
A[Damage Assessment] --> B{Crack Width > 5mm?}
B -- Yes --> C[Remove loose material]
C --> D[Fill with expansive/quick setting mortar]
D --> E{Additional reinforcement needed?}
E -- Yes --> F[Add shear/flexural steel reinforcement]
F --> G[Cover with mortar]
E -- No --> G
B -- No --> H[Injection repair or minor patching]
G --> I[Severe damage?]
I -- Yes --> J[Replace member/portion]
I -- No --> K[Apply steel mesh + plaster for walls/floors]
Summary: Use FRP for high-strength, corrosion-resistant strengthening; expansive mortars for crack filling; steel reinforcement for structural support; and steel mesh for surface strengthening.
IS 13935: Anchorage and Connection Improvements - Key Points
| Roof/Floor Type | Requirement (Cat D/E) | Retrofitting Action |
|---|---|---|
| Prefab elements | Tie beam all round + RC screed | Provide RC screed & seismic belt |
| Wooden joists + earth fill | All round seismic band | Interconnect beams with planks & diagonal ties |
| Sloping roofs (sheet/tile) | Horizontal & plane X-bracing | Anchor trusses to walls & rafters to seismic belt |
| Jack arch roofs | Horizontal ties + seismic band | Weld steel flats as ties + seismic band |
IS 13935 - References and Related Standards
| IS No. | Title |
|---|---|
| IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002 | Criteria for Earthquake Design of Structures: Part 1 - General Provisions and Buildings |
| IS 4326: 1993 | Code of Practice for Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings (3rd Rev.) |
| IS 13828: 1993 | Guidelines for Improving Earthquake Resistance of Low Strength Masonry Buildings |
| Storeys | Category D (Example) | Vertical Bar Dia. (mm) | Mesh Size (mm) | Spacing (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One | Single Bar | 10 | 10 | 300 |
| Two (Bottom) | Single Bar | 12 | 14 | 400 |
| Three (Bottom) | Single Bar | 12 | 14 | 400 |
graph LR
A[IS 13935] --> B[IS 1893 (Part 1): Earthquake Design Criteria]
A --> C[IS 4326: Earthquake Resistant Construction]
A --> D[IS 13828: Masonry Building Guidelines]
B --> E[General Provisions]
C --> F[Horizontal & Vertical Seismic Belts]
D --> G[Low Strength Masonry Improvements]
Use these standards collectively for seismic design and detailing per IS 13935. Always check for latest editions.
Frequently Asked
According to IS 13935, recommended methods for repairing cracks in masonry walls are:
| Crack Size | Repair Method | Key Materials |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 mm to 5 mm | Pressure injection of cement-polymer grout | Non-shrink grout, injection ports |
| >5 mm or crushed | Remove & rebuild with mortar, add reinforcement | Expansive/quick-setting mortar, steel mesh |
| Multiple cracks | Wire mesh strengthening | Galvanized wire fabric & rods |
Loading diagram...
This ensures durable, structural restoration of masonry walls per IS 13935.
IS 13935 Classification of Buildings for Seismic Evaluation
The standard classifies buildings based on occupancy and importance as follows:
Important Buildings (Importance Factor I = 1.5):
Ordinary Buildings:
| Building Use | Seismic Zone II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary | B | C | D | E |
| Important (I=1.5) | C | D | E | E |
Loading diagram...
This classification ensures critical facilities have enhanced seismic safety.
Reinforcement and Seismic Belts for Strengthening Masonry Openings (IS 13935)
| Building Category | Mesh Gauge | No. of Longitudinal Wires (N) | Belt Width (H, mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category D & E | 10 | 10 to 23 | 280 to 580 |
| Category C | 13 | 9 to 14 | 250 to 380 |
| Category B | 14 | 9 | 250 |
Loading diagram...
Summary: Use galvanized wire mesh (gauge 10 or 13) in belts of 200-580 mm width, with vertical and horizontal reinforcement around openings, combined with steel ties or lintels to strengthen masonry openings against seismic forces.
Assessment and Addressing of Irregularities in Building Plan and Vertical Geometry (IS 13935 & IS 1893 Part 1)
| Irregularity Type | Damage Impact | Zones Affected | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plan Irregularity | +1 damage grade | III, IV, V | Detailed evaluation |
| Vertical Irregularity | Severe damage | III, IV, V | Special evaluation & design |
Loading diagram...
Key Takeaway:
Irregularities increase seismic vulnerability; detailed evaluation and appropriate design
IS 13935 specifies the following materials and techniques for restoring structural integrity after earthquake damage:
Loading diagram...
This integrated approach ensures both repair and upgrading of seismic resistance for safer future performance.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 13935. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required