IS 13365 Part 21992AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Quantitative classification systems of rock mass-Guidelines, Part 2: Rock mass quality for prediction of support pressure in underground openings

IS 13365 Part 2: 1992 provides detailed guidelines for quantitatively classifying rock mass quality specifically to predict support pressures in underground openings such as tunnels and mine excavations. It is essential for geotechnical and mining engineers who need to assess rock stability and design appropriate support systems based on empirical correlations involving rock mass parameters like RQD, joint characteristics, water pressure, and stress factors.

15Sections
58Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1992Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 13365 Part 2 PDF, IS 13365 Part 2 pdf free download, IS 13365 Part 2 free download pdf, IS13365Part2 PDF, IS-13365-Part-2 PDF, IS 13365 Part 2 1992 PDF, IS 13365 Part 2:1992 PDF, IS 13365 Part 2-1992 PDF, IS 13365 Part 2 (1992) PDF, IS 13365 Part 2 1992 edition PDF, IS 13365 Part 2 edition 1992 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 13365 Part 2: 1992 provides detailed guidelines for quantitatively classifying rock mass quality specifically to predict support pressures in underground openings such as tunnels and mine excavations. It is essential for geotechnical and mining engineers who need to assess rock stability and design appropriate support systems based on empirical correlations involving rock mass parameters like RQD, joint characteristics, water pressure, and stress factors.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Mining Engineers
  • Tunnel Design Engineers
  • Rock Mechanics Specialists
  • Civil Engineers involved in underground construction
  • Structural Engineers focusing on underground support
  • Hydro-power Project Engineers

Key Topics Covered

Rock Mass Quality (Q) calculation methodology
Parameters: RQD, Joint Set Number (Jn), Joint Roughness (Jr), Joint Alteration (Ja)
Joint Water Reduction Factor (Jw) and its impact
Stress Reduction Factor (SRF) and active stress considerations
Empirical correlations for ultimate and short-term roof and wall support pressures
Classification of rock mass quality groups and categories
Guidelines for unsupported spans and excavation support ratios (ESR)
Correction factors for tunnel closure and squeezing ground conditions
Procedures for field data collection and parameter evaluation
Design implications for temporary and permanent support systems
Effects of geological variability around underground openings
Recommendations for dealing with squeezing and swelling ground
Use of rock mass quality to predict support pressure in different excavation types

Table of Contents

1Scope

Scope Summary & Key Specifications from IS 13365 Part 2 (1992):

This part deals with rock mass classification, stress reduction, and water pressure factors affecting excavation stability.


1. Stress Reduction Factor (SRF) – Clause 3.1.5

Weakness Zone TypeDescriptionSRF Notes
AMultiple weakness zones with clay/chemically disintegrated rock, loose rock (any depth)Highest risk
BSingle weakness zones with clay (depth ≤ 50 m)Moderate risk
CSingle weakness zones with clay (depth > 50 m)Lower risk
DMultiple shear zones in competent rock (clay-free)Moderate risk
ESingle shear zones in competent rock (depth ≤ 50 m)Lower risk
FSingle shear zones in competent rock (depth > 50 m)Lowest risk
GLoose open joints, heavily jointed rockRisk varies

Competent Rock Stress Classification:

ClassStress LevelGc/σ1Gr/σ1SRF Range
HLow stress, near surface> 200> 132.5
JMedium stress200 - 1013 - 3.661.0
KHigh stress, light structure10 - 50.66 - 0.330.5 - 2.0
LMild rock burst5 - 2.50.33 - 0.165 - 10
MHeavy rock burst< 2.5< 0.1610 - 20

2. Joint Water Reduction Factor (Jw) – Clause 3.1.4

ClassDescriptionJwApprox Water Pressure (kg/cm²)
ADry/minor inflow (<1 kg/cm²)1.0<1
BMedium inflow, occasional outwash0.91.0 - 2.5
CLarge inflow
2Reference to IS 11315 Part 11 for Core Recovery and Rock Quality

IS 13365 Part 2 refers to IS 11315 Part 11 (1985) for Core Recovery and Rock Quality, focusing on Rock Quality Designation (RQD).


Key Formulas and Tables from IS 11315 Part 11:

1. Rock Quality Designation (RQD)

[ \boxed{ RQD = 115 - 3.3 \times J_v } ]

  • (J_v) = Volumetric joint count (number of joints per cubic meter)
  • If (RQD < 10%), use a nominal value of 10% for calculations.

2. RQD Classification Table

ClassificationDesignationRQD (%) Range
AVery Poor0 - 25
BPoor25 - 50
CFair50 - 75
DGood75 - 90
EExcellent90 - 100

3. Rock Mass Classification Based on Q-value (from IS 13365 Part 2)

Q-value RangeGroupClassification
0.00001 - 0.041Good
0.04 - 0.1Very Good
0.1 - 0.4Extremely Good
0.4 - 1.0Exceptionally Good
0.001 - 0.0042Very Poor
0.004 - 0.01Poor
0.01 - 0.1Fair
0.00001 - 0.00013Exceptionally Poor

Summary:

  • Use RQD as a key quantitative descriptor of rock mass quality.
  • Calculate RQD from joint count using the formula.
  • Classify rock quality using the RQD and Q-value tables for design and analysis.

flowchart LR
    A[Volumetric Joint Count (Jv)] -->
3Determination of Rock Mass Quality (Q)

Determination of Rock Mass Quality (Q) - IS 13365 Part 2

Formula:

[ \boxed{ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} } ]

Where:

  • RQD = Rock Quality Designation (from IS 11315 Part 11)
  • Jn = Joint set number
  • Jr = Joint roughness number
  • Ja = Joint alteration number
  • Jw = Joint water reduction factor
  • SRF = Stress reduction factor

Rock Quality Designation (RQD) Calculation

[ RQD = 115 - 3.3 \times J_v ]

  • (J_v) = Volumetric joint count (number of joints per cubic meter)
  • If (RQD < 10%), use RQD = 10 as nominal for Q calculation.
ClassificationRQD (%)
Very Poor0 - 25
Poor25 - 50
Fair50 - 75
Good75 - 90
Excellent90 - 100

Rock Mass Classification Based on Q

Q RangeGroupClassification
0.001 - 0.013Exceptionally Poor
0.01 - 0.13Extremely Poor
0.1 - 12Very Poor
1 - 42Poor
4 - 102Fair
10 - 401Good
40 - 1001Very Good
100 - 4001Extremely Good
400 - 10001Exceptionally Good

Notes

  • Q relates directly to support pressure requirements for underground openings.
  • Use RQD intervals of 5 for practical accuracy (e.g.,
3.1Rock Quality Designation (RQD)

Rock Quality Designation (RQD) — IS 13365 Part 2


Key Formula:

[ \boxed{ \text{RQD} = 115 - 3.3 \times J_v } ]

  • (J_v) = volumetric joint count (total joints per cubic meter)

If RQD ≤ 10%, use a nominal value of 10 for rock mass quality evaluation.


Rock Quality Classification (Table 3.1.1):

ClassificationDesignationRQD (%)
AVery Poor0 - 25
BPoor25 - 50
CFair50 - 75
DGood75 - 90
EExcellent90 - 100

Rock Mass Quality (Q) Formula (Clause 3.1):

[ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} ]

  • (J_n) = joint set number
  • (J_r) = joint roughness number
  • (J_a) = joint alteration number
  • (J_w) = joint water reduction factor
  • (SRF) = stress reduction factor

Notes on Field Data Collection (Clause 3.3):

  • Use 5-10 m core length for uniform rock.
  • For variable zones, evaluate separately or use 10-50 m for overall quality.
  • Calculate Q separately for roof, floor, and walls; use root mean square for mean Q.
  • For power tunnels, reduce (J_w) considering seepage water pressure.

This system guides support design by quantifying rock mass quality based on jointing and alteration.

3.2Joint Set Number (Jn)

Joint Set Number (Jn) - IS 13365 Part 2

The Joint Set Number (Jn) quantifies the number of joint sets in rock mass, considering foliations, schistosity, slaty cleavage, or bedding planes as joint sets if strongly developed.

Key Points:

  • Parallel discontinuities count as a full joint set.
  • Few visible joints or occasional breaks → count as random joints.
  • Multiply Jn by 2 for portals and 3 for intersections.

Table 2: Joint Set Number (Jn)

ClassificationJn
A Massive, no or few joints0.5-1.0
B One joint set2
C One joint set plus random3
D Two joint sets4
E Two joint sets plus random6
F Three joint sets9
G Three joint sets plus random12
H Four or more joint sets, random, heavily jointed, 'sugar cube'15
J Crushed rock, earthlike20

Usage Notes:

  • For intersections:
    [ Jn_{intersection} = 3 \times Jn ]
  • For portals:
    [ Jn_{portal} = 2 \times Jn ]

This parameter is critical in rock mass classification and stability analysis, influencing the Q-system rating and design decisions.

3.3Joint Roughness Number (Jr) and Joint Alteration Number (Ja)

IS 13365 Part 2: Joint Roughness Number (Jr) and Joint Alteration Number (Ja)


1. Joint Roughness Number (Jr) — Table 3 (Clause 3.1.3)

ClassificationJrDescription
A4.0Discontinuous joints
B3.0Rough or irregular, undulating
C2.0Smooth, undulating
D1.5Slickensided, undulating
E1.5Rough or irregular, planar
F1.0Smooth, planar
G0.5Slickensided, planar
H (No rock wall contact, clay zone)1.0Clay-filled zone preventing contact
J (No rock wall contact, sandy/gravelly)1.0Sandy/gravelly zone preventing contact
  • Add 1.0 if mean joint spacing > 3 m.
  • Jr = 0.5 may be used for planar slickensided joints with favorable lineations.

2. Joint Alteration Number (Ja) — Table 4 (Clause 3.1.3)

ClassificationJaApprox. Friction Angle (ør)
B Unaltered joint walls (surface staining)1.025°–35°
D Silty/sandy clay coatings (non-softening)3.020°–25°
E Softening/low friction clays (kaolinite, mica, etc.)4.08°–16°
F Sandy particles, clay-free disintegrated rock4.025°–30°
G Strongly over-consolidated, non-softening clay fillings6.016°–24°
H Medium/low over-consolidation, softening clay fillings8.012°–16°
J Sw
3.4Joint Water Reduction Factor (Jw)

Joint Water Reduction Factor (Jw) – IS 13365 Part 2

Jw quantifies the reduction in shear strength of rock joints due to water pressure, which lowers effective normal stress and may cause joint softening or outwash.

Table 5: Joint Water Reduction Factor (Jw)

ClassDescriptionJwApprox. Water Pressure (kg/cm²)
ADry or minor inflow (< 51 l/min locally)1.0< 1
BMedium inflow, occasional outwash of joint fillings0.91.0 – 2.5
CLarge inflow/high pressure, unfilled joints0.52.5 – 10.0
DLarge inflow/high pressure, considerable outwash0.332.5 – 10.0
EExceptionally high inflow/pressure at blasting, decaying0.2–0.1> 10.0
FExceptionally high inflow/pressure, no decay0.1–0.05> 10.0

Notes:

  • Increase Jw if drainage measures are installed.
  • Ice-related effects are not considered.
  • Jw is used in rock mass quality calculations, e.g., Q = (RQD/Jn) × (Jr/Ja) × (Jw/SRF).

Usage in Shear Strength Reduction:

Effective normal stress on joints is reduced by water pressure:

[ \sigma' = \sigma - u ]

Where:

  • (\sigma) = total normal stress
  • (u) = pore water pressure related to Jw factor

Summary:

  • Jw directly reduces joint shear strength.
  • Select Jw based on water inflow and pressure conditions from Table 5.
  • Use alongside Jr (roughness), Ja (alteration), and SRF (stress reduction factor) for rock mass quality.
flowchart LR
    Water_Pressure -->|Increases| Jw_Decrease[Decrease in Jw]
    Jw_Decrease -->|Reduces
3.5Stress Reduction Factor (SRF)

Stress Reduction Factor (SRF) - IS 13365 Part 2

SRF quantifies loosening, rock stress, squeezing, and swelling pressures affecting tunnel stability.


Key Points from Clause 3.1.5 & Table 6:

ConditionDescriptionSRF Range
AMultiple weakness zones with clay or disintegrated rock (any depth)High SRF (not explicitly numeric)
BSingle weakness zone with clay (depth ≤ 50 m)Moderate SRF
CSingle weakness zone with clay (depth > 50 m)Higher SRF
DMultiple shear zones in competent rock (clay-free)Moderate SRF
ESingle shear zone in competent rock (depth ≤ 50 m)Lower SRF
FSingle shear zone in competent rock (depth > 50 m)Lower SRF
GLoose joints, heavily jointed rockVariable SRF

Competent Rock Stress Categories (Gc/σ1 and SRF):

Rock ConditionGc/σ1SRF
H: Low stress, near surface> 2002.5
J: Medium stress200-101.0
K: High stress, light structure10-50.5 - 2.0
L: Mild rock burst5-2.55 - 10
M: Heavy rock burst< 2.510 - 20

Additional Notes:

  • Reduce SRF by 25-50% if shear zones only influence, not intersect excavation.
  • For strongly anisotropic stress fields (σ1/σ3 > 10), reduce unconfined compression (σc) and tensile strength (σt) to 0.6 times.
  • For shallow crown depth (less than span width), increase SRF from 2.5 to 5.

Rock Mass Quality (Q) Relation:

[ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} ]

Where:

  • RQD = Rock Quality Designation
3.6Classification of Rock Mass Based on Q

Classification of Rock Mass Based on Q (IS 13365 Part 2)


1. Rock Mass Quality (Q) Formula

[ \boxed{ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} } ]

  • RQD = Rock Quality Designation (%)
  • J_n = Joint set number
  • J_r = Joint roughness number
  • J_a = Joint alteration number
  • J_w = Joint water reduction factor
  • SRF = Stress reduction factor

2. Rock Mass Classification Table (Clause 3.4)

Q RangeGroupClassification
400,000 – 1,000.001Exceptionally good
100,000 – 400.00Extremely good
40,000 – 100.00Very good
10,000 – 40.00Good
4,000 – 10.002Fair
1,000 – 4.00Poor
100 – 1,000Very poor
0.01 – 0.103Extremely poor
< 0.01Exceptionally poor

Summary:

  • Higher Q → Better rock mass quality → Lower support needed.
  • Lower Q → Poor rock mass → Higher support requirements.

flowchart TD
    A[RQD] --> C[Calculate Q]
    B[Jn, Jr, Ja, Jw, SRF] --> C
    C --> D{Q Value}
    D -->|>400| E[Exceptionally Good]
    D -->|100-400| F[Extremely Good]
    D -->|40-100| G[Very Good]
    D -->|10-40| H[Good]
    D -->|4-10| I[Fair]
    D -->|1-4| J[Poor]
    D -->|0.1-1| K[
4Estimation of Support Pressures

Estimation of Support Pressures (IS 13365 Part 2: 1992)

Key Parameters:

  • Q = Rock mass quality (post-excavation)
  • Qwi, Qri = Short-term rock quality indices for wall and roof (related to Q)
  • f = Overburden correction factor (Eq. 4)
  • f' = Tunnel closure correction factor (Table 7, Fig. 2)

Rock Mass Quality Relations (Clause 2.5)

Q RangeQwiQri
Q > 1050 Q25 Q
0.1 < Q <102.5 Q12.5 Q
Q < 0.110 Q5 Q

Support Pressure Formulas

  • Short-term roof support pressure:

    [ P_{ri} = 120 \times (Q_{ri})^{1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • Short-term wall support pressure:

    [ P_{wi} = 20 \times (Q_{wi})^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • Ultimate wall support pressure:

    [ P_{wu} = 120 \times (Q_{wu})^{-1/8} \times f \times f' ]


Important Notes:

  • Tunnel closure > 6% of span is critical; immediate support needed.
  • Steel ribs tolerate < 2% tunnel closure.
  • For squeezing ground, keep tunnel span < 6 m.
  • Use immediate shotcrete/rock bolts to minimize support pressure.
  • Invert support is recommended only in poor/squeezing conditions.

Summary Diagram

flowchart TD
    A[Rock Mass Quality Q] --> B{Determine Qwi, Qri}
    B -->|Q > 10| C[Qwi=50Q, Qri=25Q]
    B -->|0.1 < Q < 10| D[Qwi=2.5Q, Qri=12.5Q]
    B -->|Q < 0.1| E[Q
4.1Ultimate Roof and Wall Support Pressure Correlations

IS 13365 Part 2: Ultimate Roof and Wall Support Pressure Correlations


1. Ultimate Roof Support Pressure (Pru)

[ P_{ru} = 1.0 \times (Q_{ru})^{-1/3} \times f \quad \text{(kg/cm}^2) ]

  • (Q_{ru}) = Ultimate roof rock mass quality
  • (f = 1 + \frac{H - 320}{800}) (Correction factor for overburden)
  • (H) = Overburden depth in meters

2. Ultimate Wall Support Pressure (Pwu)

Wall rock quality (Q_{wu}) depends on rock group:

GroupCondition(Q_{wu}) Formula
1Good to exceptionally good(Q_{wu} = 5 Q_u)
2Very poor to fair(Q_{wu} = 2.5 Q_u)
3Extremely poor to exceptionally poor(Q_{wu} = Q_u)

Ultimate wall support pressure:

[ P_{wu} = 120 \times (Q_{wu})^{-1/8} \times f \times f' \quad \text{(kg/cm}^2) ]

  • (f') = Correction factor for tunnel closure (from Table 7, Fig. 2)
  • (f) = Overburden correction (as above)

3. Short-term Support Pressures

  • Roof:

[ P_{ri} = 120 \times (Q_{ri})^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • (Q_{ri} = 5 Q_{ru}) (short-term roof rock quality)

  • Wall:

[ P_{wi} = 201 \times (Q_{wi})^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • (Q_{wi}) depends on rock quality (see clause 3.5.1.2)

4. Notes

  • Tunnel closure should be limited to <6% span to avoid rapid pressure increase.
  • Steel ribs absorb max 2% tunnel closure.
4.2Short-term Support Pressure Calculations

Short-term Support Pressure Calculations (IS 13365 Part 2)

Key Formulas:

  1. Short-term Roof Support Pressure (Pri): [ P_{ri} = 120 \times Q_{ri}^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]

    • (P_{ri}): short-term vertical roof support pressure (kg/cm²)
    • (Q_{ri} = 5Q): short-term roof rock quality
    • (f): correction factor for overburden (Eq. 4)
    • (f'): correction factor for tunnel closure (Table 7)
  2. Short-term Wall Support Pressure (Pwi): [ P_{wi} = 102 \times Q_{wi}^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]

    • (Q_{wi}): short-term wall rock quality (adjusted from Q by factors depending on Q magnitude)
  3. Ultimate Wall Support Pressure (Pwu): [ P_{wu} = 120 \times Q_{wu}^{-1/8} \times f \times f' ]


Important Notes:

  • Correction Factors:

    • (f): accounts for overburden depth.
    • (f'): accounts for tunnel closure; from Table 7 and Fig. 2.
  • Tunnel Closure Limits:

    • Max 6% closure allowed; beyond this, support pressures rise rapidly.
    • Steel ribs absorb max 2% closure.
  • Rock Mass Quality (Q):

    • Used as base parameter; multiplied by factors (e.g., 5 for roof) to get short-term qualities.

Summary Table

ParameterFormulaUnitsNotes
Short-term Roof Pressure (P_{ri})(120 \times Q_{ri}^{-1/3} \times f \times f')kg/cm²(Q_{ri} = 5Q)
Short-term Wall Pressure (P_{wi})(102 \times Q_{wi}^{-1/3} \times f \times f')kg/cm²(Q_{wi}) adjusted from (Q\
4.3Correction Factors for Tunnel Closure and Overburden

IS 13365 Part 2: Correction Factors for Tunnel Closure and Overburden

Key Formulas for Support Pressure (Clause 3.5.2.2)

  • Short-term roof support pressure: [ P_{ru} = 20 \times (Q_{ru})^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ] where:

    • ( f ) = correction factor for overburden (Eq. 4)
    • ( f' ) = correction factor for tunnel closure (Table 7, Fig. 2)
  • Ultimate wall support pressure: [ P_{wu} = 120 \times (Q_{wu})^{-1/8} \times f \times f' ]

  • Short-term roof support pressure (alternative): [ P_{ri} = 120 \times (Q_{ri})^{1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • Short-term wall support pressure: [ P_{wi} = 201 \times (Q_{wi})^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]


Correction Factors for Tunnel Closure ( f' ) (Table 7)

SI No.Rock ConditionSupport SystemTunnel Closure (%)( f' )
1Non-squeezing (H < 350 Q^{1/3})Any-1.1
2Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Very stiff< 2> 1.8
3Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Stiff2 - 40.85
4Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Flexible4 - 60.70
5Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Very flexible6 - 81.15
6Squeezing
5Unsupported Span and Excavation Support Ratio (ESR)

IS 13365 Part 2: Unsupported Span & Excavation Support Ratio (ESR)


1. Unsupported Span (Clause 3.6)

The equivalent unsupported dimension ( D_e ) (span, diameter, or height in meters) for self-supporting tunnels is:

[ \boxed{ D_e = 2 \times Q^{0.4} } ]

  • (Q) = Rock mass quality (higher Q = better quality)
  • Use span or diameter for roof support analysis.
  • Use diameter or height for wall support analysis.

2. Excavation Support Ratio (ESR) (Table 8)

Type of ExcavationESR
Permanent mine openings, hydro power tunnels (excluding high-pressure penstocks)1.6
Storage rooms, water treatment plants, minor road/rail tunnels, surge chambers1.3
Power stations, major road/rail tunnels, civil defence chambers, portals1.0
  • For temporary support, multiply ESR by 1.5 and increase (Q) to (5Q).

3. General Conditions for Permanently Unsupported Openings

  • (J_n < 9), (J_r > 1.0), (J_a < 10), (J_w = 1.0), SRF < 2.5
  • Additional criteria based on RQD, joint set numbers, and SRF (see clauses for details).

4. Correction Factor for Tunnel Closure (f') (Table 7)

Rock ConditionSupport SystemTunnel Closure (%)(f')
Non-squeezing (H < 350 Q^{1/3})Any-1.1
Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Very stiff< 2> 1.8
Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Stiff2 - 40.85
Squeezing (H > 350 Q^{1/3})Flexible
6Field Data Collection Guidelines

IS 13365 Part 2: Field Data Collection Guidelines (Clause 3.3)

Key Points for Field Data Collection:

  • Core/Excavation Length:

    • For uniform rock mass: 5-10 m core/wall length is sufficient.
    • For closely jointed shear zones:
      • If shear zones > 1-2 m wide, evaluate parameters (RQD, Jn, Jr, Ja) separately.
      • If shear zones < 1-2 m and frequent, use an overall reduced Q value.
      • Core/wall length may extend to 10-50 m for overall rock mass quality.
  • Rock Mass Quality (Q) Evaluation:

    • Obtain Q values separately for roof, floor, and two walls if rock mass is non-uniform.
    • Mean Q value = Root Mean Square (RMS) of max and min Q values:

    [ Q_{mean} = \sqrt{\frac{Q_{max}^2 + Q_{min}^2}{2}} ]

  • Water Pressure (Jw) Adjustment:

    • For power tunnels, reduce Jw assuming seepage water pressure equals internal water pressure (refer Table 6 in IS 13365).
  • Rounding Off:

    • Follow IS 2:1960 for rounding numerical values, retaining significant digits as per the standard.

Parameters to Collect:

ParameterDescription
RQDRock Quality Designation
JnJoint Set Number
JrJoint Roughness Number
JaJoint Alteration Number
JwJoint Water Reduction Factor
QRock Mass Quality Number (RQD / Jn × Jr / Ja × Jw)

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Field Data Collection] --> B{Rock Mass Uniformity?}
    B -- Uniform --> C[Core Length 5-10 m]
    B -- Non-uniform --> D{Shear Zone Width}
    D -- >2 m --> E[Evaluate parameters separately]
    D -- <2 m --> F[Use overall reduced Q]
    E --> G[Core Length 10-50 m]
    F --> G
    G --> H[Calculate Q

Popular Questions About IS 13365 Part 2

?How is the rock mass quality (Q) calculated according to IS 13365 Part 2?

According to IS 13365 Part 2, the Rock Mass Quality (Q) is calculated using the formula:

[ \boxed{ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} } ]

Where:

  • RQD = Rock Quality Designation (from IS 11315 Part 11), calculated as: [ RQD = 115 - 3.3 \times J_v ] (J_v) = volumetric joint count (number of joints per cubic meter).
    If RQD < 10%, use a nominal value of 10.

  • J_n = Joint set number (number of joint sets)

  • J_r = Joint roughness number

  • J_a = Joint alteration number

  • J_w = Joint water reduction factor

  • SRF = Stress reduction factor

Rock Quality Designation (RQD) Classification:

ClassificationRQD (%)
Very Poor0 - 25
Poor25 - 50
Fair50 - 75
Good75 - 90
Excellent90 - 100

Rock Mass Quality (Q) Classification:

Q Value RangeRock Mass GroupClassification
0.1 - 0.41Good
0.4 - 1.0Very Good
1.0 - 4.0Extremely Good
4.0 - 10.0Exceptionally Good
0.01 - 0.12Very Poor
0.001 - 0.01Poor
0.0001 - 0.001Fair
< 0.00013Exceptionally/Extremely Poor

This Q-value helps predict ultimate support pressure required for underground openings.

Loading diagram...
?What parameters influence the prediction of support pressure in underground openings?

IS 13365 Part 2 focuses on rock mass quality as the key parameter influencing the prediction of support pressure in underground openings.

Key Parameters Influencing Support Pressure Prediction:

  • Rock Mass Quality: Assessed through classification systems (e.g., Barton’s Q-system), incorporating:
    • Rock strength and condition
    • Joint set number and roughness
    • Joint water conditions
    • Stress conditions around the opening
  • Geological Features: Presence of faults, fractures, and weathering
  • In-situ Stress State: Magnitude and orientation of stresses affecting the excavation
  • Opening Geometry: Size and shape of the underground opening

Summary:

Support pressure prediction depends primarily on rock mass classification, which integrates geological and geomechanical properties to estimate the load the support system must carry.

Loading diagram...

This approach ensures safe and economical design of underground supports per IS 13365 Part 2.

?How does joint water pressure affect rock mass quality and support design?

Effect of Joint Water Pressure on Rock Mass Quality and Support Design (IS 13365 Part 2)

  1. Rock Mass Quality (Q) Equation:

[ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} ]

  • Jw = Joint water reduction factor, accounts for water pressure effects on rock mass quality.
  • Higher water pressure reduces Jw, thus lowering Q.
  1. Joint Water Reduction Factor (Jw) Table:
ClassificationJwApprox Water Pressure (kg/cm²)
A (Dry/minor inflow)1.0< 1
B (Medium inflow)0.91.0 - 2.5
C (Large inflow, unfilled joints)0.52.5 - 10.0
D (Large inflow, outwash of fillings)0.332.5 - 10.0
E (Exceptionally high, decaying)0.2 - 0.1> 10.0
F (Exceptionally high, continuous)0.1 - 0.05> 10.0
  1. Impact on Support Design:
  • Lower Jw → Lower Q → Higher ultimate support pressure.
  • Ultimate roof support pressure (P_{ru}) is inversely related to (Q_{ru}^{1/3}):

[ P_{ru} = \frac{1}{J_r} \times Q_{ru}^{-1/3} \times f ]

where (f = 1 + \frac{H - 320}{800}) (H = overburden in m).


Summary:

  • Joint water pressure reduces rock mass quality (Q) via Jw, increasing support pressure requirements.
  • Accurate assessment of Jw is critical for reliable support design.
  • Drainage can improve Jw, reducing support needs.
Loading diagram...
?What empirical correlations are used to estimate ultimate and short-term support pressures?

Empirical Correlations for Ultimate and Short-Term Support Pressures (IS 13365 Part 2)

The code provides empirical formulas to estimate support pressures based on rock mass quality (Q), correction factors for overburden (f), and tunnel closure (f'):


1. Ultimate Support Pressures

  • Ultimate Roof Support Pressure (Pru):

[ P_{ru} = 20 \times Q_{ru}^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • Ultimate Wall Support Pressure (Pwu):

[ P_{wu} = 120 \times Q_{wu}^{-1/8} \times f \times f' ]


2. Short-Term Support Pressures

  • Short-Term Roof Support Pressure (Pri):

[ P_{ri} = 120 \times Q_{ri}^{1/3} \times f \times f' ]

  • Short-Term Wall Support Pressure (Pwi):

[ P_{wi} = 20 \times Q_{wi}^{-1/3} \times f \times f' ]


Notes:

  • (Q_{ru}, Q_{wu}, Q_{ri}, Q_{wi}) = rock mass quality indices for respective locations and time frames.
  • (f) = correction factor for overburden (see Equation 4 in IS 13365).
  • (f') = correction factor for tunnel closure (from Table 7 and Fig. 2).
  • Ultimate to short-term pressure ratio varies from ~1.7 (5^(1/3)) up to 6 for problematic rock masses.
  • Tunnel closure >6% span leads to rapid pressure increase; immediate support needed.

This approach helps design supports considering rock mass behavior and tunnel deformation.

?How should unsupported spans be determined based on rock mass quality?

Based on IS 13365 Part 2, the unsupported span (De) for tunnels depends on the rock mass quality (Q) as follows:

Step 1: Calculate Rock Mass Quality (Q)

[ Q = \frac{RQD}{J_n} \times \frac{J_r}{J_a} \times \frac{J_w}{SRF} ]

  • RQD = Rock Quality Designation
  • Jn = Joint set number
  • Jr = Joint roughness number
  • Ja = Joint alteration number
  • Jw = Joint water reduction factor
  • SRF = Stress reduction factor

Step 2: Determine Unsupported Span (De)

[ D_e = 2 \times 0.6 \times (Q^{0.4}) = 1.2 \times Q^{0.4} \quad \text{(in meters)} ]

  • (D_e) = Equivalent dimension of unsupported span (span, diameter, or height)
  • This formula limits the maximum self-supporting span without additional support.

Summary:

  • Higher Q → better rock quality → larger unsupported span possible.
  • Use the formula to estimate max unsupported span, ensuring safety and stability.
Loading diagram...

This approach guides tunnel design for safe unsupported excavation based on rock mass quality.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 13365 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required