IS 115041985AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Criteria for the structural design of reinforced concrete natural draught cooling towers

IS 11504-1985 provides comprehensive criteria for the structural design of reinforced concrete natural draught cooling towers, primarily focusing on hyperbolic shell structures. It covers analysis methods, load considerations including wind, earthquake, and thermal effects, reinforcement detailing, foundation design, and construction tolerances. This standard is essential for civil and structural engineers involved in designing and constructing durable, safe, and efficient cooling towers used in thermal power plants and heavy industries.

9Sections
72Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1985Edition
Special StructuresCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 11504 PDF, IS 11504 pdf free download, IS 11504 free download pdf, IS11504 PDF, IS-11504 PDF, IS 11504 1985 PDF, IS 11504:1985 PDF, IS 11504-1985 PDF, IS 11504 (1985) PDF, IS 11504 1985 edition PDF, IS 11504 edition 1985 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 11504-1985 provides comprehensive criteria for the structural design of reinforced concrete natural draught cooling towers, primarily focusing on hyperbolic shell structures. It covers analysis methods, load considerations including wind, earthquake, and thermal effects, reinforcement detailing, foundation design, and construction tolerances. This standard is essential for civil and structural engineers involved in designing and constructing durable, safe, and efficient cooling towers used in thermal power plants and heavy industries.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Structural Engineers
  • Civil Engineers
  • Design Consultants
  • Construction Managers
  • Power Plant Engineers
  • Industrial Facility Planners
  • Foundation Specialists

Key Topics Covered

Structural analysis of hyperbolic shell cooling towers
Load considerations: wind, earthquake, thermal, construction
Reinforcement requirements and detailing
Buckling and vibration characteristics
Foundation design and soil-structure interaction
Construction tolerances and formwork requirements
Wind pressure distribution and aerodynamic effects
Openings and fittings in tower shells
Protective measures for steel and concrete
Spacing criteria for groups of cooling towers
Access and safety fixtures including ladders and lighting
Material specifications for concrete and steel reinforcement

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 11504: Scope - Key Symbols, Proportions & Construction Checks

1. Scope & Symbols (Clause 3.1)

  • Geometry & Dimensions:

    • ( D ): Base diameter at basin sill level
    • ( R_o ): Horizontal radius
    • ( H ): Total tower height above basin sill
    • ( H_b ): Vertical distance from throat to basin sill
    • ( r_t ): Top radius
    • ( t ): Thickness of shell
    • ( T_{th} ): Throat radius
  • Material Properties:

    • ( E ): Short-term modulus of elasticity of concrete
    • ( \nu ): Poisson’s ratio of concrete
  • Stress Resultants:

    • ( M_m, M_c, M_t ): Meridional, circumferential, twisting moments/unit length
    • ( N_m, N_c ): Meridional, circumferential stress resultants/unit length
    • ( Q_m, Q_c ): Transverse shear stress resultants/unit length
  • Loads & Pressures:

    • ( p' ): Design wind pressure coefficient
    • ( P_{cr} ): Critical buckling pressure
    • ( P_+, P_0, P_z ): Load components/unit area

2. Recommended Shell Proportions (Clause 6.1.1)

  • Designs should adhere to commonly adopted hyperbolic shell proportions used in cooling towers.
  • Deviations require careful structural study.

3. Constructional Geometry Checks (Clause 7.4)

Height RangeAllowable Survey Inaccuracy
Up to 30 m± 15 mm
30 to 60 m± 40 mm
60 to 120 m± 60 mm
Above 120 m± 80 mm
  • Horizontal radius readings every 6 m height or weekly during construction.
  • Ground stations arranged at ≤ 10° plan angle apart for absolute position checks.

Summary Diagram: Shell Geometry & Stress Resultants

graph TD
    A[Shell Geometry] -->|Dimensions| B(Base Diameter D)
    A --> C(Height H)
    A --> D(
2Definitions

IS 11504 - Key Definitions, Symbols & Wind Pressure Distribution


1. Key Definitions & Symbols (Clause 2.0 & 3.1)

SymbolMeaning
TthThroat radius
DBase diameter at basin sill level
EModulus of elasticity of concrete (short-term)
FaFourier coefficient of nth term
Thickness of the shell
HTotal tower height above basin sill level
HmMeridional moment/unit length of middle surface
MCircumferential moment/unit length of middle surface
M₁, M₂Twisting moments/unit length of middle surface
N₁Meridional stress resultant/unit length of middle surface
N₂Circumferential stress resultant/unit length of middle surface
Nu, NeShearing stress resultants/unit length of middle surface
p'Design wind pressure coefficient
PcrCritical buckling pressure
RoHorizontal radius
HbVertical distance from throat to basin sill level
rtTop radius
νPoisson's ratio of concrete

2. Wind Pressure Coefficient Distribution (Clause 2.2 & Appendix A)

The wind pressure coefficient around the shell is:

[ p'(\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^7 F_n \cos(n \theta) ]

  • (p') = design wind pressure coefficient
  • (F_n) = Fourier coefficients (Table below)
  • (\theta) = angular position from wind direction (degrees)
n(F_n)
0-0.00071
1+0.24611
2+0.62296
3+0.48833
4+0.10756
5-0.09579
6-0.01142
7+0.04551

This series is accurate up to 7 terms.


3Symbols and Notations

IS 11504 - Symbols, Notations & Key Formulas

Key Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaning
TthThroat radius
DBase diameter at basin sill level
EModulus of elasticity of concrete (short term)
FaFourier coefficient of nth term
Thickness of the shell
HTotal tower height above basin sill level
MₘMeridional moment per unit length
MₙCircumferential moment per unit length
NₘMeridional stress resultant per unit length
NₙCircumferential stress resultant per unit length
p'Design wind pressure coefficient
PcrCritical buckling pressure
RoHorizontal radius
HbVertical distance from throat to basin sill
rtTop radius
νPoisson's ratio of concrete

Wind Pressure Coefficient (Clause 2.2)

[ p'(\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^{7} F_n \cos(n\theta) ]

  • (p'): design wind pressure coefficient
  • (\theta): angular position from wind direction (degrees)
  • (F_n): Fourier coefficients (Table below)
n(F_n)
0-0.00071
1+0.24611
2+0.62296
3+0.48833
4+0.10756
5-0.09579
6-0.01142
7+0.04551

Use with basic wind pressure from IS 875.


Geometry of Hyperboloid (Clause B-2)

[ \frac{r^2}{a^2} - \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1 ]

  • Radii of curvature:

[ R_m = r \csc \phi = \frac{r(1 + (dr/dy)^

4Materials

IS 11504: Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications for Materials


1. Concrete Materials (Clause 4.1)

  • Concrete shall conform to IS 456:1978 (Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete).
  • Key properties include:
    • Modulus of Elasticity (E): Short-term modulus used in design.
    • Poisson's Ratio (ν): Typically ~0.2 for concrete.
  • Unit weights and dead loads per IS 1911:1967.

2. Steel Reinforcement (Clause 4.2)

  • Steel types allowed for reinforcement:
    • Mild steel & medium tensile bars: IS 432 (Part 1 & 2)-1982
    • Hot-rolled mild & medium tensile deformed bars: IS 1139-1966
    • Hard-drawn steel wire fabric: IS 1566-1982
    • Cold-worked high strength deformed bars: IS 1786-1979

3. Key Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaning
TthThroat radius
DBase diameter at basin sill
EModulus of elasticity of concrete
νPoisson's ratio of concrete
M, NMoment and stress resultants
p'Design wind pressure coefficient

4. Typical Dead Load Calculation (IS 1911)

[ \text{Dead Load} = \text{Unit weight} \times \text{Volume} ]

  • Unit weights (approximate):
    • Concrete: 24 kN/m³
    • Steel: 78.5 kN/m³

5. Steel Reinforcement Grades (IS 1786)

GradeYield Strength (f_y) (MPa)Typical Use
Fe 415415Mild steel reinforcement
Fe 500500High strength deformed bars
Fe 550550Higher strength bars

flowchart TD
    A[Materials] --> B[Concrete
5Loads and Load Combinations

IS 11504: Loads and Load Combinations

Key Loads to Consider (Clause 5.1)

  • Dead Load (DL): As per IS 1911-1967; includes self-weight and permanent fixtures.
  • Earthquake Forces (EL): As specified.
  • Thermal Restraint Loads: Due to temperature variations.
  • Construction Loads: Temporary loads during construction.
  • Other Loads: Snow, foundation settlement, etc.

Load Combinations (Clause 5.2)

  • Follow IS 875 (Part 5) - 1964 for load combinations.
  • Typical load combination formula:
Load Combination No.Load Combination Formula
11.5 × Dead Load (DL)
21.2 × DL + 1.6 × Live Load (LL) + 0.5 × Earthquake Load (EL)
31.2 × DL + 1.6 × EL + 0.5 × LL
40.9 × DL + 1.6 × EL

Important Notes

  • Dead loads must be carefully assessed (Clause 5.1.1).
  • Secondary stresses from permanent fixtures should be investigated.
  • Wind pressure distribution is detailed in Appendix A (Clauses 5.1.3 and 6.2).

Summary Diagram: Load Combination Concept

flowchart LR
    DL[Dead Load] --> LC[Load Combination]
    LL[Live Load] --> LC
    EL[Earthquake Load] --> LC
    TRL[Thermal Restraint Load] --> LC
    CL[Construction Load] --> LC
    OL[Other Loads] --> LC
    LC --> Design[Design Load for Analysis]

For detailed values and factors, refer to IS 875 (Part 5) and IS 1911 for dead load assessment.

6Tower Design Considerations

IS 11504 - Tower Design Considerations: Key Points

1. Permissible Stresses

  • Follow IS 456-1978 for permissible stresses in concrete and steel.
  • Typical permissible stresses:
    • Concrete compression: ~0.45 fck
    • Steel tension: ~0.87 fy

2. Vibration Characteristics (Clause 6.3.4)

  • Natural frequency ( f \propto \frac{1}{\sqrt{m} \cdot h} )
  • Taller towers have lower natural frequencies → higher susceptibility to wind-induced vibrations.
  • Design must ensure damping or stiffness to avoid resonance with wind vortex shedding.

3. Foundation Specifications (Clause 6.5.2)

Tower HeightFoundation Type
> 75 mContinuous foundation or annular pile cap
≤ 75 mIndividual isolated foundations

4. General Design Notes

  • Wind load design per IS 875 (Part 3).
  • Structural stability against overturning and sliding must be checked.
  • Reinforced concrete detailing as per IS 456.

graph TD
A[Tower Height] -->|> 75 m| B[Continuous Foundation]
A -->|≤ 75 m| C[Isolated Foundation]
D[Vibration Frequency] -->|Inversely proportional| E[Tower Height & Mass]
E --> F[Design for Wind-Induced Vibrations]

Summary: Use IS 456 for stresses, design foundations based on height, and carefully assess vibration for tall towers to ensure structural safety.

7Constructional Aspects

IS 11504: Constructional Aspects - Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications


1. Dimensional Tolerances (Clause 7.3)

ParameterTolerance
Shell wall centre line (horizontal plane, 3m chord)±15 mm
Shell wall centre line (meridional plane, 1m height)±10 mm
Shell thickness+10 mm / -5 mm
Horizontal radius (any section except base)±50 mm
Horizontal radius (shell base)±40 mm

2. Shell Geometry Checking (Clause 7.4)

  • Ground stations spaced ≤ 10° plan angle apart.
  • Horizontal radius readings every 6 m height or weekly.
Height RangeAllowance for Survey Inaccuracy
Up to 30 m±15 mm
30 m to 60 m±40 mm
60 m to 120 m±60 mm
Above 120 m±80 mm

3. Shell Formwork (Clause 7.2)

  • Must be rigid, shape-preserving, tight-fitting.
  • Recommended: Steel formwork.
  • Should prevent deflection/movement during concreting.
  • Follow IS 456-1978 for general formwork provisions.

4. Recommended Shell Proportions (Clause 6.1.1)

  • Designs limited to well-studied hyperbolic shell proportions commonly used in cooling towers.
  • Other shapes require detailed study.

Summary Diagram: Tolerances & Checks

graph TD
A[Shell Construction] --> B[Dimensional Tolerances]
B --> C[Horizontal Centre Line ±15 mm]
B --> D[Meridional Centre Line ±10 mm]
B --> E[Thickness +10/-5 mm]
B --> F[Horizontal Radius ±40 to 50 mm]
A --> G[Geometry Checks]
G --> H[Ground Stations ≤10° apart]
G --> I[Height-based survey inaccuracies]
I --> J[≤30m: ±15 mm]
I --> K[30-60m: ±40 mm]
I --> L[60-120m: ±
Appendix AWind Pressure Distribution

Wind Pressure Distribution on Cooling Tower Shell (IS 11504 - Appendix A)

  • Applicable for towers ≤ 120 m height and ≤ 100 m base diameter.

1. Wind Pressure Coefficient (p') Formula:

[ p'(\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^{7} F_n \cos(n \theta) ]

  • (\theta) = Angular position around shell (degrees from wind direction)
  • (F_n) = Fourier coefficients (see table below)

2. Fourier Coefficients (F_n):

n(F_n)
0-0.00071
1+0.24611
2+0.62296
3+0.48833
4+0.10756
5-0.09579
6-0.01142
7+0.04551

Series up to 7 terms provides sufficient accuracy.

3. Design Wind Pressure on Shell:

[ p_{design}(\theta) = p_{basic} \times p'(\theta) ]

  • (p_{basic}) = Basic wind pressure from IS 875 (Part 3)
  • Multiply (p'(\theta)) by (p_{basic}) to get local pressure.

4. Additional Notes:

  • Pressure distribution is symmetrical about wind centerline.
  • Increase values by 10% to account for geometric imperfections.

graph LR
A[Basic Wind Pressure (IS 875)] --> B[Multiply by p'(\u03B8)]
B --> C[Design Wind Pressure Distribution]
C --> D[Shell Surface Load]

This method ensures accurate circumferential wind load modeling for cooling tower shell design.

Appendix BAnalysis of Shell

IS 11504 - Analysis of Shell (Clause 6.3.1 & Appendix B)

Key Points:

  • Analysis basis: Use elasticity theory for thin shells of revolution; concrete assumed uncracked, homogeneous, isotropic.
  • Recommended method: Bending analysis preferred over membrane analysis for stress resultants.
  • Boundary conditions:
    • Upper edge: Free edge with smooth thickness transition to ring beam.
    • Lower edge: Elastically supported by columns; smooth thickness transition to thickened lower ring beam.

Important Symbols:

SymbolMeaning
TthThroat radius
DBase diameter at basin sill level
EModulus of elasticity of concrete
tThickness of shell
HTotal tower height above basin sill
Mθ, MφMeridional and circumferential moments
Nθ, NφMeridional and circumferential stress resultants
Qθ, QφTransverse shear stress resultants
νPoisson's ratio of concrete

Typical Governing Equations (Membrane & Bending):

  • Membrane equilibrium:

[ \frac{dN_\theta}{d\theta} + (N_\phi - N_\theta) \cot \theta + q R = 0 ]

  • Bending moments and compatibility involve differential equations relating (M_\theta, M_\phi) and shell curvature.

Design Recommendations:

  • Smooth thickness transitions to avoid stress concentrations.
  • Consider elastic support at the base.
  • Account for wind loads (design wind pressure coefficient (p')) though vibration effects are not fully covered.

graph LR
A[Shell of Revolution] --> B[Membrane Analysis]
A --> C[Bending Analysis (Recommended)]
B --> D[Stress Resultants Nθ, Nφ]
C --> E[Moments Mθ, Mφ and Shear Qθ, Qφ]
F[Boundary Conditions] --> G[Upper Edge: Free, Smooth Transition]
F --> H[Lower Edge: Elastic Support, Thickened Ring Beam]

For detailed formulas and equilibrium equations, refer to Appendix B of IS 11504.

Popular Questions About IS 11504

?What types of loads must be considered in the structural design of cooling towers according to IS 11504?

According to IS 11504 (1985) for reinforced concrete natural draught cooling towers, the structural design must consider the following types of loads:

  • Dead Loads: Self-weight of the shell, ring beams, columns, and other structural components.
  • Wind Loads: Critical due to the tall, thin shell shape; must consider static and possible wind-induced vibrations.
  • Thermal Loads: Temperature gradients causing expansion or contraction stresses.
  • Seismic Loads: Depending on the seismic zone, lateral forces must be accounted for.
  • Hydrostatic Loads: From water inside the tower or on the shell surface.
  • Other Loads: Construction loads, crane loads (if applicable), and any imposed loads from equipment.

Key Notes from IS 11504:

  • Shell analysis uses elasticity theory for thin shells of revolution.
  • The lower edge is elastically supported by columns.
  • The upper edge is often a free edge with a ring beam.
  • Permissible stresses follow IS 456-1978.

Summary Table of Loads:

Load TypeDescription
Dead LoadSelf-weight of structure
Wind LoadStatic + dynamic effects
Thermal LoadTemperature gradients
Seismic LoadEarthquake forces (zone dependent)
Hydrostatic LoadWater pressure inside or outside shell
Construction/OtherTemporary or imposed loads
Loading diagram...

Designers should ensure all these loads are combined per relevant IS codes and analyzed using thin shell theory as recommended.

?What are the recommended reinforcement minimums and spacing for cooling tower shells?

Minimum Reinforcement and Spacing for Cooling Tower Shells (IS 11504: Clause 6.3.6)

  • Minimum reinforcement ratio:

    • Mild steel bars: 0.35% of gross cross-sectional area (in each direction)
    • Cold-worked high strength deformed bars: 0.25% of gross cross-sectional area (in each direction)
  • Maximum spacing:

    • Not more than 2 × shell thickness in either direction
  • Layering:

    • For shell thickness ≥ 175 mm, provide two layers of reinforcement (preferably on both faces)

Summary Table

ParameterValue
Min. reinforcement (mild steel)0.35% of gross cross-sectional area
Min. reinforcement (high strength bars)0.25% of gross cross-sectional area
Max. spacing2 × shell thickness
Reinforcement layers2 layers if thickness ≥ 175 mm

This ensures adequate crack control and structural integrity under thermal and wind loads typical for natural draught cooling towers.

Loading diagram...
?How does the standard address wind pressure distribution and aerodynamic effects on cooling towers?

IS 11504 on Wind Pressure Distribution & Aerodynamic Effects on Cooling Towers

  • Applicability: For cooling towers ≤120 m height & ≤100 m base diameter (single or groups).
  • Wind Pressure Distribution:
    • Prefer wind tunnel tests for shell shape (Clause 5.1.3).
    • If not feasible, use Appendix A's Fourier series-based pressure coefficient distribution.
  • Pressure Coefficient Formula:
    [ p'(\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^7 F_n \cos(n \theta) ] where:
    • (p') = design wind pressure coefficient
    • (\theta) = angular position from wind direction (degrees)
    • (F_n) = Fourier coefficients (see table below)
n(F_n)
0-0.00071
1+0.24611
2+0.62296
3+0.48833
4+0.10756
5-0.09579
6-0.01142
7+0.04551
  • Additional Considerations:
    • Account for turbulence-induced load intensification (natural & from adjacent towers).
    • Multiply (p') by basic wind pressure from IS 875 for final design pressure.

Loading diagram...

This approach captures aerodynamic effects and pressure variation circumferentially on the cooling tower shell.

?What construction tolerances are specified for shell geometry and thickness?

IS 11504 Construction Tolerances for Shell Geometry and Thickness

  • Shell wall center line (horizontal plane, 3 m chord): ±15 mm
  • Shell wall center line (meridional plane, 1 m height): ±10 mm
  • Shell thickness tolerance: +10 mm / -5 mm
  • Horizontal radius (any section except base): ±50 mm
  • Horizontal radius at shell base: ±40 mm

Survey Accuracy Allowances for Horizontal Radius Checks (Clause 7.4):

Height Range (m)Allowance (mm)
Up to 30±15
30 to 60±40
60 to 120±60
Above 120±80

Key Notes:

  • Geometry checks should be done from ground stations spaced ≤10° apart in plan.
  • Horizontal radius readings every 6 m height or weekly during construction, whichever is more frequent.
  • Thickness tolerance ensures structural integrity and affects stress distribution.
Loading diagram...

These tolerances ensure dimensional accuracy critical for shell stability and performance.

?How should openings and fixtures be designed to minimize stress concentrations in the shell?

To minimize stress concentrations around openings and fixtures in shells per IS 11504 Clause 6.3.5:

  • Avoid openings where possible; if needed, keep them as small as possible.
  • Shape openings to reduce stress concentration—prefer smooth, rounded edges rather than sharp corners.
  • If edge thickening is necessary, taper thickness smoothly back to the shell thickness to avoid abrupt stiffness changes.
  • Provide additional edge reinforcement with a minimum cross-sectional area equal to 75% of the reinforcement intercepted by the opening parallel to the edges.
  • At each corner, provide diagonal reinforcement with total cross-sectional area = 0.5 × d (where d = shell thickness in cm).
  • Ensure no horizontal thrust from inlet piping is transmitted to the shell to avoid local stress spikes.

Summary Table for Reinforcement at Openings:

LocationReinforcement Area
Edges≥ 75% of intercepted reinforcement
Corners (diagonal)0.5 × shell thickness (d) in cm²

This approach ensures smooth load transfer and reduces local stress peaks, enhancing shell durability.

Loading diagram...

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11504. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required