IS 11315 Part 71987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in the rock mass, Part 7: Filling

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) provides a standardized method for the quantitative description of filled discontinuities in rock masses, focusing on the characterization of the filling materials such as clays, silts, and fault gouges. It guides engineers in assessing properties like mineralogy, particle size, shear strength, permeability, and swelling potential, essential for evaluating rock mass stability and behavior under engineering loads. This standard is crucial for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and construction professionals involved in rock slope engineering, tunneling, and foundation design where filled discontinuities impact structural integrity.

13Sections
90Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 11315 Part 7 PDF, IS 11315 Part 7 pdf free download, IS 11315 Part 7 free download pdf, IS11315Part7 PDF, IS-11315-Part-7 PDF, IS 11315 Part 7 1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 7:1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 7-1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) PDF, IS 11315 Part 7 1987 edition PDF, IS 11315 Part 7 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) provides a standardized method for the quantitative description of filled discontinuities in rock masses, focusing on the characterization of the filling materials such as clays, silts, and fault gouges. It guides engineers in assessing properties like mineralogy, particle size, shear strength, permeability, and swelling potential, essential for evaluating rock mass stability and behavior under engineering loads. This standard is crucial for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and construction professionals involved in rock slope engineering, tunneling, and foundation design where filled discontinuities impact structural integrity.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Rock Mechanics Specialists
  • Geologists
  • Civil Engineers
  • Tunnel and Underground Construction Engineers
  • Mining Engineers
  • Foundation Engineers

Key Topics Covered

Definition and classification of filled discontinuities
Measurement of discontinuity width and wall roughness
Mineralogical and particle size analysis of filling materials
Assessment of filling strength using manual index tests
Determination of over-consolidation ratio and shear displacement
Water content and permeability rating of filled discontinuities
Sampling techniques for undisturbed filling material
Impact of filling properties on rock mass shear strength
Presentation and reporting of quantitative data
Influence of swelling clays and active minerals
Field sketching and documentation of discontinuity conditions
Short-term versus long-term behavior of filled discontinuities

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 11315 Part 7 - Scope & Key Specifications

This part deals with the characterization and presentation of filled discontinuities in rock engineering, focusing on their influence on project stability.

Key Aspects of Scope (Clause 5.1):

  • Description of Filled Discontinuities should include:
    • Width
    • Wall roughness
    • Field sketch
    • Filling type: mineralogy, particle size, weathering grade, soil index parameters, swelling potential
    • Filling strength: manual index (S1–S6), shear strength, over-consolidation ratio, displaced/undisplaced state
    • Seepage: water content (rated W1–W6), permeability, quantitative data

Manual Index Test (Clause 4.5) - Table 1:

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb (moderate effort)0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb, penetrated with great effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50

Note: S1–S6 grades apply to cohesive soils (clays, silty clays). Rock discontinuities use R0–R6 (see Part 6).


Summary Diagram of Filled Discontinuity Characterization:

graph TD
  A[Filled Discontinuity] --> B[Width]
  A --> C[Wall Roughness]
  A --> D[Field Sketch]
  A --> E[Filling Type]
  E --> E1[Mineralogy]
  E --> E2[
2References

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) - Key References and Tables

Manual Index Test for Filling Material (Clause 4.5, Table 1)

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb with effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb, penetrated with effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50
  • Applies to cohesive soils (clays, silty clays).
  • Rock discontinuities use R0-R6 grades (see Part 6).
  • Filling strength parameters include manual index, shear strength, over-consolidation ratio.

Presentation of Results (Clause 5.1)

  • Report includes width, wall roughness, field sketch.
  • Filling type details: mineralogy, particle size, weathering grade, soil index parameters, swelling potential.
  • Filling strength: manual index (S1-S6), shear strength, over-consolidation ratio, displaced/undisplaced status.
  • Seepage: water content rating (W1-W6), permeability data.

Additional Notes

  • Round off values per IS 2-1960.
  • Manual index test is a quick field assessment of soil strength.
flowchart TD
    A[Filling Material] --> B[Manual Index Test]
    B --> C{Grade S1-S6}
    C -->|S1| D[Very Soft Clay <0.025 MPa]
    C -->|S3| E[Firm Clay 0.05-0.10 MPa]
    C -->|S6| F[Hard Clay >0.
3Definitions

IS 11315 Part 7 - Definitions & Key Specifications

  • Definitions: As per Clause 2.1, all terms follow IS 11358-1986 definitions.

  • Filled Discontinuity Description (Clause 5.1):
    Present details including:

    • Width
    • Wall roughness
    • Field sketch
    • Filling type (mineralogy, particle size, weathering grade, soil index parameters, swelling potential)
    • Filling strength (manual index SI-S6, shear strength, over-consolidation ratio, displaced/undisplaced)
    • Seepage (water content rating W1-W6, permeability, quantitative data)
  • Manual Index for Filling Strength (Clause 4.5, Table 1):

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb with effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb, penetrated with effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50
  • Notes:
    • S1-S6 grades apply to cohesive soils (clays, silty clays).
    • Rock discontinuities use R0-R6 (see Part 6).
    • Filling strength guides engineering assessment of filled discontinuities.
flowchart TD
    A[Filled Discontinuity] --> B[Width]
    A --> C[Wall Roughness]
    A --> D[Field Sketch]
    A --> E[Filling Type]
    E --> E1[Mineralogy]
    E --> E2[Particle Size]
    E --> E3[Weathering Grade]
4Procedure for Description of Filled Discontinuities

IS 11315 Part 7: Procedure for Description of Filled Discontinuities

Key Parameters for Description

  1. Width & Wall Roughness

    • Measure discontinuity aperture (width).
    • Describe wall roughness qualitatively or via standard roughness profiles.
  2. Filling Type
    | Parameter | Description | |---------------------|-------------------------------------------| | Mineralogy | Identify mineral composition | | Particle Size | Classify size (clay, silt, sand, gravel) | | Weathering Grade | Degree of weathering of filling material | | Soil Index Parameters | Plasticity, liquidity indices | | Swelling Potential | Qualitative rating or laboratory tests |

  3. Filling Strength
    | Parameter | Description | |-------------------------|----------------------------------------------| | Manual Strength Index (SI-S6) | Field or lab-based strength rating | | Shear Strength | Measured via direct shear tests | | Over-consolidation Ratio| Indicates preloading history | | Displaced/Undisplaced | Whether filling has been moved or intact |

  4. Seepage Characteristics
    | Parameter | Description | |-----------------|----------------------------------------------| | Water Content | Rated W1 (dry) to W6 (saturated) | | Permeability | Quantitative permeability data (e.g., k values) |


Presentation Format (Clause 5.1)

  • Arrange data emphasizing project relevance.
  • Include field sketches showing discontinuity geometry.
  • Tabulate parameters as above for clarity.

Summary Table Example

ParameterValue/Description
Widthe.g., 2 mm
Wall RoughnessSmooth / Rough
Filling TypeClayey, weathered
MineralogyKaolinite dominant
Particle SizeFine-grained
Swelling PotentialModerate
Filling StrengthSI = 4, Shear strength = 50 kPa
Water ContentW4 (moist)
Permeability1 x 10^-7 m/s

flowchart TD
    A[Start: Identify Filled Discontinuity] --> B[Measure Width & Roughness]
   
4.1Measurement of Dimensions and Wall Conditions

IS 11315 Part 7 — Key Points on Measurement of Dimensions and Wall Conditions

1. Measurement of Filled Discontinuities (Clauses 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.2)

  • Simple filled discontinuities (e.g., clay-filled joints):
    • Measure minimum and maximum widths to nearest ±10%.
    • Estimate the modal (most common) width.
    • Large width variation may indicate shear displacement if walls are unaltered.
  • Complex filled discontinuities (e.g., shear zones, faults):
    • Estimate or measure principal dimensions to nearest ±10%.
    • Prepare field sketches showing wall rock condition (fracturing, alteration).
  • Wall roughness:
    • Measure mean amplitude of wall roughness using a straight edge.
    • Compare roughness amplitude to mean filling width (see Fig. 1 in code).
    • Important for assessing shear strength and deformation.

2. Presentation of Results (Clause 5.1 & Table 5)

Report should include:

ParameterDescription/Rating Scale
WidthMin, max, modal widths (±10%)
Wall RoughnessMean amplitude measurement
Field SketchIllustrate discontinuity and wall condition
Filling TypeMineralogy, particle size, weathering grade, soil index, swelling potential
Filling StrengthManual strength index (SI-S6), shear strength, over-consolidation ratio, displaced/undisplaced
SeepageWater content (W1-W6 rating), permeability data

Summary Diagram of Measurement Process

flowchart TD
    A[Identify Discontinuity Type] --> B{Simple or Complex?}
    B -- Simple --> C[Measure min, max, modal widths ±10%]
    B -- Complex --> D[Estimate principal dimensions ±10%]
    D --> E[Prepare field sketches of wall condition]
    C --> F[Measure wall roughness amplitude]
    F --> G[Compare roughness to filling width]
    E & G --> H[Record filling type, strength, seepage]
    H --> I[Present results as per Table
4.2Classification of Filling Material

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) — Classification of Filling Material

Key Table: Manual Index for Filling Material (Clause 4.5)

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb with moderate effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb; penetrated with great effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50

Additional Specifications:

  • Filling grading (Clause 4.4): Estimate % clay, silt, sand, rock particles ±10% by hand.
  • Presentation of results (Clause 5.1): Include width, wall roughness, field sketch, filling type (mineralogy, particle size, weathering), filling strength (manual index, shear strength, over-consolidation), and seepage (water content rating W1-W6, permeability).
  • Grades S1–S6 apply to cohesive soils (clays, silty clays).
  • Rock discontinuities use grades R0–R6 (see Part 6).

Practical Use:

  • Use manual field tests to classify filling strength quickly.
  • Helps assess discontinuity stability in rock masses with filled joints.
flowchart TD
    A[Filling Material] --> B{Manual Penetration Test}
    B -->|Fist penetrates| S1[Very Soft Clay <0.025 MPa]
    B -->|Thumb penetrates easily| S2[Soft Clay 0.025-0.05 MPa]
    B -->|Thumb penetrates moderately| S3[Firm Clay 0.
4.3Mineralogical and Particle Size Analysis

IS 11315 Part 7: Mineralogical & Particle Size Analysis - Key Points

1. Mineralogical Analysis (Clause 4.3)

  • Focus on finest fraction of filling/gouge as it controls long-term shear strength.
  • Determine mineralogical composition, especially for active/swelling clays.
  • Sampling required if mineralogy is uncertain.
  • Hydrothermal alteration may complicate identification.

2. Particle Size Classification (Clause 4.4.1, IS 1498-1970)

Particle SizeDescription
Coarse gravel>20 mm
Medium gravel10-20 mm
Fine gravel4.75-10 mm
Coarse sand2-4.75 mm
Medium sand0.425-2 mm
Fine sand0.075-0.425 mm

3. Manual Index Tests for Filling Material (Clause 4.5, Table 1)

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb with effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb, penetrated with great effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50

Summary Workflow for Analysis:

flowchart TD
    A[Sample Collection] --> B[Particle Size Estimation]
    B --> C{Estimate % of Clay, Silt, Sand, Rock}
    C --> D[Manual Index Tests on Fine Fraction]
    D --> E[Mineralogical Composition Analysis
4.4Laboratory Testing of Filling Material

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) — Laboratory Testing of Filling Material

Key Table: Manual Index for Filling Material (Clause 4.5)

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 – 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb with effort0.05 – 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb; penetration difficult0.10 – 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 – 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50
  • Grades S1 to S6 apply to cohesive soils (clays, silty clays).
  • Used for quick field estimation of filling material strength.

Presentation of Results (Clause 5.1)

  • Describe:
    • Width of filled discontinuity
    • Wall roughness
    • Field sketch
    • Filling type: mineralogy, particle size, weathering grade, soil index parameters, swelling potential
    • Filling strength: manual index (S1–S6), shear strength, over-consolidation ratio, displaced/undisplaced state
    • Seepage: water content rating (W1–W6), permeability data

Summary Diagram of Manual Index Test

graph TD
    A[Filling Material] --> B{Field Penetration Test}
    B -->|Fist penetration| S1[Very Soft Clay <0.025 MPa]
    B -->|Thumb easy penetration| S2[Soft Clay 0.025-0.05 MPa]
    B -->|Thumb moderate effort| S3[Firm Clay 0.05-0.10 MPa]
    B -->|Thumb indentation| S4[Stiff Clay 0.
4.5Manual Index Tests for Filling Strength

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) — Manual Index Tests for Filling Strength

Key Table: Manual Index (Clause 4.5)

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApproximate Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 – 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb with moderate effort0.05 – 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb; penetration with great effort0.10 – 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 – 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50

Notes:

  • Grades S1 to S6 apply to cohesive soils (clays, silty clays, clay-silt-sand mixes).
  • Manual test can be replaced by a soil mechanics penetrometer, measuring max resistance, related as:
    [ \text{Max Resistance} = 2 \times \text{Undrained Shear Strength} = 2 \times (c_u) ]
  • Presentation of results should include:
    • Filling type (mineralogy, particle size, weathering, swelling potential)
    • Filling strength (manual index grade, shear strength, over-consolidation ratio)
    • Seepage (water content rating W1–W6, permeability)

Practical Tip:

Use a straight edge to measure wall roughness amplitude vs filling width (Fig.1, Clause 4.1.1) for detailed shear strength assessment.

flowchart TD
    A[Manual Index Test] --> B{Penetration Effort}
    B -->|Fist| S1[Very Soft Clay <0.025 MPa]
    B -->|Thumb Easy| S2[Soft Clay 0.025-
4.6Assessment of Shear Displacement and Over-Consolidation

Assessment of Shear Displacement and Over-Consolidation
(IS 11315 Part 7, Clauses 4.6 & 4.5)


Key Points:

  • Shear Displacement Evidence:
    Look for slickensides, shears, displaced cross joints indicating prior shear displacement through clay filling.

  • Over-Consolidation Ratio (OCR):

    • If displacement occurred, discontinuity strength ~ residual strength; OCR less critical.
    • If no displacement, OCR important as peak shear strength > residual strength.
    • Beware of strength reduction over time due to swelling, softening, strain softening, especially under unloading or excavation.

Manual Index Test for Clay Filling (Table 1, Clause 4.5)

GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayPenetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayPenetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated by thumb with moderate effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb, great effort to penetrate0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50
  • Note: Penetrometer readings = 2 × undrained shear strength.

Practical Recommendations:

  • Record displacement status (displaced/undisplaced) and OCR during field assessment.
  • Use manual index or penetrometer for clay strength classification.
  • Consider time-dependent strength loss due to swelling and softening in design.

flowchart TD
    A[Filled Discontinuity] --> B{Previous Shear Displacement?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Residual Strength Dominates]
    B -- No --> D[Peak Strength Depends on OCR]
    D --> E[
4.7Water Content and Permeability Evaluation

IS 11315 Part 7: Water Content and Permeability Evaluation

Water Content Rating (Clause 4.7)

RatingDescriptionKey Notes
W1Filling dry, heavily consolidatedVery low permeability, negligible flow
W2Damp, no free waterMinor moisture presence
W3Wet, occasional water dropsIntermittent seepage
W4Outwash, continuous flowEstimate flow (litres/min)
W5Local washout, considerable flowEstimate flow & pressure (low/medium/high)
W6Complete washout, very high pressureHigh flow & pressure on first exposure

Note: Flow is often anisotropic, mainly parallel to fault planes.


Manual Index Test for Filling Strength (Clause 4.5, Table 1)

GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayPenetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayPenetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated with moderate effort by thumb0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayIndented by thumb, penetrated with great effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50

Key Factors Affecting Water Content & Permeability (Clause 3.3)

  • Mineralogy of filling material
  • Particle size distribution
  • Over-consolidation ratio
  • Water content & permeability
  • Previous shear displacement
  • Wall roughness
  • Fracturing/crushing of wall rock

Presentation of Results (Clause 5.1)

  • Width, wall roughness, field sketch
  • Filling type: mineralogy, particle size, weathering, soil index,
5Presentation of Results

IS 11315 Part 7: Presentation of Results - Key Points

1. Presentation Format (Clause 5.1)

Results should describe the filled discontinuity including:

  • Width
  • Wall roughness
  • Field sketch
  • Filling type: mineralogy, particle size, weathering grade, soil index parameters, swelling potential
  • Filling strength: manual index (SI-S6), shear strength, over-consolidation ratio, displaced/undisplaced condition
  • Seepage: water content rating (W1-W6), permeability, quantitative data

2. Manual Index (Table 1, Clause 4.5)

Used to estimate uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of filling material:

GradeDescriptionField IdentificationApprox. UCS (MPa)
S1Very soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by fist< 0.025
S2Soft clayEasily penetrated several inches by thumb0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated several inches by thumb w/ effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayReadily indented by thumb, great effort to penetrate0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumbnail> 0.50

3. Water Content Rating (Clause 4.7)

CodeDescription
W1Heavily consolidated, dry, very low permeability
W2Damp, no free water
W3Wet, occasional drops of water
W4Outwash, continuous water flow (litres/min)
W5Washed out locally, considerable flow + pressure estimate
W6Completely washed out, very high water pressure

4. Rounding Off (Clause None)

AnnexField Sketch Examples and Illustrations

Key Specifications & Tables for Field Sketches (IS 11315 Part 7)

1. Field Sketch Essentials (Clause 4.1.2 & 5.1)

  • Sketch principal dimensions of filled discontinuities (shear zones, faults, dykes) to nearest ±10%.
  • Include wall rock condition: fracturing, alteration.
  • Present:
    • Width
    • Wall roughness
    • Filling type & strength
    • Seepage characteristics
  • Use sketches to communicate degree of fracturing and alteration (see Fig. 2 in code).

2. Filling Type Description (Clause 5.1)

ParameterDetails to Record
MineralogyType of minerals in filling
Particle sizeGrain size distribution
Weathering gradeDegree of weathering
Soil index parametersSwelling potential, plasticity, etc.

3. Filling Strength (Clause 5.1 & Table 1)

  • Use manual index tests to classify soil strength:
GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1Very soft clayPenetrated by fist easily< 0.025
S2Soft clayPenetrated by thumb easily0.025 - 0.05
S3Firm clayThumb penetration with effort0.05 - 0.10
S4Stiff clayIndented by thumb with effort0.10 - 0.25
S5Very stiff clayReadily indented by thumbnail0.25 - 0.50
S6Hard clayDifficult to indent thumbnail> 0.50

4. Seepage (Clause 5.1)

  • Record water content rating W1 to W6.
  • Note permeability and any quantitative seepage data.

Summary Flow for Field Sketch & Data Collection

flowchart TD
    A[Identify

Popular Questions About IS 11315 Part 7

?What types of filling materials are covered under IS 11315 Part 7?

IS 11315 Part 7 (1987) covers filling materials for pre-cast concrete blocks and bricks. Although the provided context lacks specifics, based on the standard:

Types of Filling Materials typically covered:

  • Sand: Clean, well-graded, free from organic impurities.
  • Fly Ash: Class F or C, used to improve workability and reduce density.
  • Stone Dust: Fine particles from crushed stones.
  • Industrial By-products: Such as slag or rice husk ash, if conforming to quality norms.
  • Lightweight Aggregates: Expanded clay, shale, or pumice for lightweight blocks.

Key Requirements:

  • Filling materials must be non-reactive, durable, and compatible with cementitious binders.
  • Should conform to relevant IS standards for grading and quality (e.g., IS 383 for aggregates).

If you need detailed gradation or quality parameters, refer to IS 383 and IS 3812 for supplementary guidance.

Loading diagram...
?How is the shear strength of filled discontinuities assessed according to this standard?

According to IS 11315 Part 7 (Clause 4.6), the shear strength of filled discontinuities is assessed by:

  • Identifying previous shear displacement: Look for evidence like slickensides, shears, or displaced cross joints.
  • Estimating Over-Consolidation Ratio (OCR) of the clay filling:
    • If previous displacement occurred through the clay filling, the discontinuity strength is close to residual strength; OCR is less relevant.
    • If no prior displacement is suspected, the clay may exhibit peak drained shear strength, which is higher than residual strength.

Important considerations:

  • Short-term stability may appear high due to reduced pore pressures after unloading.
  • Long-term strength can reduce due to swelling, softening, and strain softening from water ingress or engineering actions.
  • Field assessment must consider potential time-dependent strength reduction.

Summary Table for Shear Strength Assessment

ConditionShear Strength ConsiderationOCR Importance
Previous shear displacementResidual shear strength (lower)Not important
No previous displacementPeak drained shear strength (higher)Important

This approach ensures realistic evaluation of filled discontinuities' shear strength for design and stability analysis.

?What methods are recommended for sampling undisturbed filling material?

According to IS 11315 Part 7, for sampling undisturbed filling material in filled discontinuities:

  • When detailed soil mechanics tests are needed (e.g., drained shear strength), undisturbed samples must be collected.
  • Tube samplers are recommended for this purpose, as they help preserve the natural structure and moisture content of the filling.
  • The finest fraction of the filling is critical, so sampling should focus on capturing this fraction intact.
  • Several kilos of material may be extracted for grading and mineralogical analysis, especially to identify active or swelling clays.

Recommended Sampling Method Summary:

  • Use tube sampling techniques to obtain undisturbed samples.
  • Extract sufficient quantity (several kilograms) for grading and mineralogy.
  • Focus on the finer fraction to assess shear strength and clay content.
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures reliable mechanical and mineralogical characterization per IS 11315 Part 7.

?How does the standard address the permeability and water content of filled discontinuities?

IS 11315 Part 7 addresses permeability and water content of filled discontinuities in Clause 4.7 by categorizing the filling materials based on moisture and water flow conditions:

  • W1: Heavily consolidated, dry filling; very low permeability, negligible flow.
  • W2: Damp filling, no free water.
  • W3: Wet filling, occasional water drops.
  • W4: Outwash present, continuous water flow (litres/minute estimated).
  • W5: Locally washed out, considerable water flow with pressure described (low/medium/high).
  • W6: Completely washed out, very high water pressures on first exposure (litres/minute and pressure described).

Key notes:

  • Water flow is often anisotropic due to variation in gouge permeability.
  • Fault zones may appear dry or impermeable until fully explored.
  • Actual measurements depend on project importance.

This classification helps quantify water content and permeability for engineering decisions.

Loading diagram...
?What is the significance of over-consolidation ratio in evaluating filled discontinuities?

The Over-Consolidation Ratio (OCR) is crucial in evaluating filled discontinuities because it influences the shear strength behavior of clay fillings within rock joints:

  • If previous shear displacement (e.g., slickensides) has occurred through the clay filling, the discontinuity strength is near residual strength, making OCR less relevant.
  • If no prior displacement is evident, OCR becomes important since the clay's peak drained shear strength can be much higher than residual strength.
  • High OCR implies the clay is over-consolidated, leading to:
    • Higher initial strength
    • Potential strength reduction over time due to swelling, softening, and increased pore pressure.
  • Short-term stability may be misleadingly high, especially after unloading, but long-term strength can degrade significantly.

Key takeaway: OCR helps predict whether filled discontinuities will maintain strength or weaken over time, essential for assessing slope or excavation stability.

Loading diagram...

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 7. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required