IS 11315 Part 51987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses, Part 5: Wall strength

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) specifies the method for quantitatively evaluating the compressive strength of rock mass discontinuity walls. It guides engineers in assessing wall strength using field tests like the Schmidt hammer and manual index tests, considering factors such as weathering and rock density. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and civil engineers involved in rock mass characterization for construction, mining, and infrastructure projects.

10Sections
110Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 11315 Part 5 PDF, IS 11315 Part 5 pdf free download, IS 11315 Part 5 free download pdf, IS11315Part5 PDF, IS-11315-Part-5 PDF, IS 11315 Part 5 1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 5:1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 5-1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) PDF, IS 11315 Part 5 1987 edition PDF, IS 11315 Part 5 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) specifies the method for quantitatively evaluating the compressive strength of rock mass discontinuity walls. It guides engineers in assessing wall strength using field tests like the Schmidt hammer and manual index tests, considering factors such as weathering and rock density. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and civil engineers involved in rock mass characterization for construction, mining, and infrastructure projects.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Rock Mechanics Specialists
  • Civil Engineers
  • Mining Engineers
  • Geologists
  • Structural Engineers
  • Construction Project Managers

Key Topics Covered

Quantitative evaluation of rock wall strength
Use of Schmidt hammer for rebound testing
Effects of weathering and alteration on rock strength
Manual index tests for rock strength estimation
Preparation and testing of rock surfaces
Interpretation of rebound values and rock density
Estimation of joint wall compressive strength (JCS)
Sampling and testing protocols for discontinuities
Influence of mineral coatings on shear strength
Data presentation and reporting guidelines
Limitations of field tests in loose rock masses
Calibration of field tests against laboratory data

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 11315 Part 5 - Scope: Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications

Scope Summary:

Defines classification and assessment of rock mass weathering, rock material weathering, and rock strength for engineering purposes.


1. State of Weathering of Rock Mass (Table 1)

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weathering, slight discoloration on discontinuitiesI
Moderately weathered<50% decomposed/disintegrated, fresh/discoloured rock as continuous/coreIII
Highly weathered>50% decomposed/disintegrated, discontinuous framework/core stonesIV
Completely weatheredAll decomposed/disintegrated, original mass structure intactV
Residual soilAll converted to soil, fabric destroyed, volume change, not transportedVI

2. State of Weathering of Rock Material (Table 2)

TermDescription
FreshNo visible sign of weathering
DiscolouredColour changed; specify degree and affected minerals
DecomposedWeathered to soil; fabric intact, mineral grains decomposed
DisintegratedWeathered to soil; fabric intact, friable, grains not decomposed

3. Strength of Rock by Manual Index (Table 3)

GradeDescriptionField IDUniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa)
S1-S6Clay types (soft to hard)Penetration varies from fist to thumb-nail<0.025 to >0.50
R0-R6Rock strength (extremely weak to extremely strong)Indentation/fracture by hammer or knife0.25 to >250

4. Schmidt Hammer Rebound Number & Corrections

  • Rebound number (r) correlates with rock strength (10-60 range).
  • Lowest for weak rocks (<20 MPa), highest for very strong (>150 MPa).
  • Use vertical downward hammer application for standard correlation.
  • Corrections apply for other hammer directions (Table 4).
2Terminology and Definitions

Key Terminology & Definitions from IS 11315 Part 5 (1987)

1. Weathering State of Rock Mass (Table 1)

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weathering; slight discoloration on major discontinuitiesI
Moderately weathered<50% rock decomposed/disintegrated; fresh/discoloured rock as continuous framework/core stonesIII
Highly weathered>50% rock decomposed/disintegrated; discontinuous framework/core stonesIV
Completely weatheredAll rock decomposed/disintegrated; original structure largely intactV
Residual soilAll rock converted to soil; structure & fabric destroyed; volume change, soil not transportedVI

2. Weathering State of Rock Material (Table 2)

TermDescription
FreshNo visible weathering
DiscolouredColour changed; specify degree and mineral affected
DecomposedWeathered to soil; original fabric intact but mineral grains decomposed
DisintegratedWeathered to soil; fabric intact; rock friable but mineral grains not decomposed

3. Strength of Rock by Manual Index (Table 3)

GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. UCS (MPa)
S1Very soft clayPenetrated by fist<0.025
S2Soft clayPenetrated by thumb0.025–0.05
S3Firm clayPenetrated by thumb with moderate effort0.05–0.10
S4Stiff clayIndented by thumb, penetrated with effort0.10–0.25
S5Very stiff clayIndented by thumb-nail0.25–0.50
S6Hard clayIndented with difficulty by thumb-nail>0.50
R0Extremely weak rockIndented by thumb-nail
3Factors Affecting Wall Strength

IS 11315 Part 5 – Factors Affecting Wall Strength

Key Factors Affecting Wall Strength:

  • Weathering & Alteration of rock mass significantly reduce strength.
  • Strength depends on rock mass continuity and rock material properties.

Important Tables & Tests:

Table 1Strength variation with weathering of rock mass
FreshHighest strength
Slightly weatheredModerate strength
Highly weatheredLow strength
Table 2Strength variation with rock material type
IgneousHigh strength
SedimentaryModerate strength
MetamorphicVariable strength depending on alteration
Table 3Manual Index Tests for Rock Strength Estimation
Point Load TestProvides uniaxial strength index
Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS)Direct strength measure

Schmidt Hammer Test (Fig. 1):

  • Non-destructive test to estimate surface hardness.
  • Correlates rebound number to compressive strength.

Typical Strength Estimation Formula:

[ \sigma_c = k \times R ]

  • (\sigma_c): Compressive strength
  • (R): Rebound number from Schmidt hammer
  • (k): Empirical constant from calibration

flowchart LR
    A[Rock Mass Weathering] --> B[Strength Reduction]
    C[Rock Material Type] --> B
    D[Manual Index Tests] --> E[Strength Estimation]
    F[Schmidt Hammer Test] --> E
    B --> E

Summary: Wall strength depends on rock weathering, rock type, and test-based strength indices (manual and Schmidt hammer). Use Tables 1-3 and Fig.1 for assessment.

4Equipment and Test Methods

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) - Equipment and Test Methods Key Points

Equipment for Wall Strength Evaluation (Clause 3.7)

  • Geological hammer with a tapered point.
  • Sharp tool (strong pen knife or similar).
  • Schmidt Hammer (L-type) with:
    • Manufacturer’s conversion table to correct rebound number for orientation.
    • Graph (Fig. 1) to convert corrected rebound number to estimated uniaxial compressive strength (UCS).
  • Equipment for dry density measurement of small rock samples:
    • Oven
    • Balance
    • Pyknometer
    • Beaker

Reporting Results (Clause 0.6)

  • Final test or analysis values must be rounded off as per IS 2-1960 standard.

Typical Schmidt Hammer Use Formula:

[ \text{UCS} = f(\text{Corrected Rebound Number}) ]

  • Use manufacturer’s table for correction.
  • Use graph (Fig. 1) for UCS estimation.

Summary Table Example (from Manufacturer)

Rebound Number (Raw)Corrected Rebound NumberEstimated UCS (MPa)
302850
403890
5048140

flowchart LR
    A[Geological Hammer] --> B[Rock Surface Preparation]
    C[Schmidt Hammer] --> D[Rebound Number Measurement]
    D --> E[Correction using Table]
    E --> F[Estimate UCS using Graph]
    G[Sample] --> H[Dry Density Measurement]
    H --> I[Oven, Balance, Pyknometer]

This ensures standardized, reproducible rock strength evaluation and reporting per IS 11315 Part 5.

5Test Procedures and Data Collection

IS 11315 Part 5 - Test Procedures and Data Collection: Key Formulas, Tables, and Specifications


1. Rounding Off Results

  • Follow IS 2-1960 for rounding final observed or calculated test values.

2. Schmidt Hammer Test (Clause 4.4.5)

  • Used to estimate Joint Compressive Strength (JCS) on discontinuities, including mineral coatings.
  • Rebound number (r) ranges:
    • Weak rocks: ~10 (Fc < 20 MPa)
    • Very strong rocks: ~60 (Fc > 150 MPa)
  • Corrections needed when hammer is not vertical downwards.
Rebound (r)Correction at Horizontal (x=0)
10-3.2
20-3.4
30-3.1
40-2.7
50-2.2
60-1.7

3. Rock Weathering Classification (Table 1 & 2)

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weatheringI
Moderately weathered<50% decomposed/disintegratedIII
Highly weathered>50% decomposed/disintegratedIV
Completely weatheredAll decomposed but structure intactV
Residual soilAll converted to soil, structure destroyedVI

4. Manual Index Strength of Rock (Table 3)

GradeDescriptionField IDUCS Range (MPa)
R0Extremely weak rockIndented by thumb-nail0.25 - 1.0
R1Very weak rockCrumbles under hammer blows1.0 - 5.0
R2Weak rockPeeled with difficulty by knife5.0 - 25
R3Medium strong rockFract
6Data Analysis and Strength Estimation

IS 11315 Part 5: Data Analysis & Strength Estimation Summary


1. Strength Governed by Weathering (Clause 3.6)

  • Rock Mass Weathering Grades (Table 1):
    • Fresh (Grade I) to Residual Soil (Grade VI)
  • Rock Material Weathering (Table 2):
    • Fresh, Discoloured, Decomposed, Disintegrated

2. Strength Estimation by Manual Index Tests (Table 3)

GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. UCS (MPa)
S1-S6Very soft to hard clayPenetration by fist/thumb/nail<0.025 to >0.50
RO-R6Extremely weak to extremely strong rockHammer/knife tests0.25 to >250
  • Note: S1-S6 for cohesive soils; RO-R6 for rock discontinuity walls.

3. Schmidt Hammer Test (Clause 3.6, Fig. 1)

  • Use L-type Schmidt hammer.
  • Measure rebound number (r) and dry density (γ).
  • Use manufacturer’s correction table and Fig. 1 graph to estimate uniaxial compressive strength (UCS).

4. Equipment (Clause 3.7)

  • Geological hammer (pointed)
  • Pen knife
  • Schmidt hammer (L-type)
  • Oven, balance, pycnometer (for density)

5. Estimation Formula (Clause 4.4.3)

  • Joint Compressive Strength (JCS) estimated from mean rebound number (r) and rock density (γ) using Fig. 1 correlation chart.

Example: Manual Index to UCS

If rock is "Medium strong" (R3), fractured by single hammer blow:
UCS ≈ 25-50 MPa

Visual: Schmidt Hammer Correlation (Simplified)

graph LR
A[Rebound Number (r)] --> B[Correct for Orientation]
B --> C[Use Fig. 1 Chart]
C --> D[Estimate UCS (MPa)]
E[Rock Density (γ)] --> C

This process ensures a practical

7Presentation of Results

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) - Presentation of Results: Key Points

1. Rounding Off Results

  • Final values must be rounded as per IS 2:1960 standard.

2. Weathering Classification of Rock Mass (Table 1)

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weathering; slight discoloration on discontinuitiesI
Moderately weathered<50% decomposed/disintegrated; fresh rock present as framework/core stonesIII
Highly weathered>50% decomposed/disintegrated; fresh rock discontinuous framework/core stonesIV
Completely weatheredAll decomposed/disintegrated; original mass structure largely intactV
Residual soilAll converted to soil; structure/fabric destroyed; volume change but soil not transportedVI

3. Weathering of Rock Material (Table 2)

TermDescription
FreshNo visible weathering
DiscolouredColour changed; specify degree and minerals affected
DecomposedWeathered to soil with intact fabric but mineral grains decomposed
DisintegratedWeathered to soil, friable, fabric intact, mineral grains not decomposed

4. Strength of Rock by Manual Index (Table 3)

GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. UCS (MPa)
S1-S6Clays (very soft to hard)Penetration varies (fist/thumb/nail)<0.5 to >0.5
R0-R6Rock (extremely weak to extremely strong)Indentation and fracturing by hammer/knife0.25 to >250
  • Note: S1-S6 apply to cohesive soils; R0-R6 apply to rock discontinuities.

5. Schmidt Hammer Testing Notes & Corrections

  • Rebound number r ranges 10-60 (weak to very strong rock).
  • Use vertical downward hammering for standard correlation.
  • Apply corrections if hammer used at other angles (Table 4
8Limitations and Precautions

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) - Limitations and Precautions Summary

Key Points on Schmidt Hammer Testing (Clause 4.4.5):

  • Mineral Coatings: Thin mineral coatings (e.g., calcite, chlorite, talc) can affect rebound values; test directly on coating surface.
  • Rebound Number Range: 10 (weak rock, <20 MPa) to 60 (very strong rock, >150 MPa).
  • Testing Direction: Rebound number varies with hammer orientation.
    • Vertical downwards: baseline.
    • Corrections needed for other directions (see Table 4).
  • Weathering Effect: Joint wall compressive strength (JCS) may be ~25% of intact rock strength due to weathering.
  • Block Movement: May cause low rebound values; high values are rare.

Table 4: Schmidt Hammer Rebound Correction (r)

Rebound (r)Vertical Down (-90°)-45°Horizontal (0°)+45°Vertical Up (+90°)
100-0.8-3.2--
200-0.9-3.4-6.9-8.8
300-0.8-3.1-6.2-7.8
400-0.7-2.7-5.3-6.6
500-0.6-2.2-4.3-5.3
600-0.4-1.7-3.3-4.0

Weathering Classification (Clause 3.6, Table 1 & 2)

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weathering, slight discoloration onlyI
Moderately Weathered<50% decomposed/disintegrated;
9References

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) — Key References Summary

1. Weathering States of Rock Mass (Clause 3.6, Table 1)

TermDescriptionGrade
FreshNo visible weathering; slight discoloration on discontinuitiesI
Moderately weathered<50% rock decomposed/disintegrated; fresh/discoloured rock as continuous framework/core stonesIII
Highly weathered>50% rock decomposed/disintegrated; fresh/discoloured rock discontinuous framework/core stonesIV
Completely weatheredAll rock decomposed/disintegrated; original mass structure largely intactV
Residual soilAll rock converted to soil; mass structure destroyed; volume change but soil not transportedVI

2. Weathering States of Rock Material (Table 2)

TermDescription
FreshNo visible weathering
DiscolouredColour changed; specify degree and affected minerals
DecomposedWeathered to soil; original fabric intact but mineral grains decomposed
DisintegratedWeathered to soil; fabric intact; friable rock but mineral grains not decomposed

3. Strength of Rock by Manual Index (Clause 3.6, Table 3)

GradeDescriptionField IDApprox. UCS Range (MPa)
S1-S6Cohesive soils (clays)Penetration/indentation by thumb/fist<0.5
RO-R6Rock strength levelsFrom thumb-nail indent to chipping with hammer0.25 to >250

4. Schmidt Hammer Testing (Clause 4.4.5 & Fig.1)

  • Rebound number (r): 10 (weak rock, <20 MPa) to 60 (very strong rock, >150 MPa).
  • Use vertical downward hits for standard correlation.
  • Apply correction factors (Table 4) for other orientations:

| Rebound (r) | -45° | +45° | Horizontal (0°) |

10Annexures and Conversion Tables

IS 11315 Part 5 (1987) primarily deals with the presentation of results for concrete tests, including annexures and conversion tables.

Key Points on Annexures & Conversion Tables:

  • Annexures typically include:

    • Sample calculation formats.
    • Standardized reporting templates.
    • Graphs or charts for quick reference.
  • Conversion Tables cover:

    • Unit conversions (e.g., psi to MPa, lb/ft³ to kg/m³).
    • Strength equivalence tables for different curing periods.
    • Aggregate size conversions.

Common Useful Conversions (Indicative):

QuantityFromToFactor
Pressure/StresspsiMPa0.006895
Lengthinchmm25.4
Weightlbkg0.4536
Volumeft³0.02832

Typical Formula for Strength Conversion:

[ f_{c,28} = f_{c,t} \times \frac{f_{c,28,ref}}{f_{c,t,ref}} ]

Where:

  • ( f_{c,28} ) = compressive strength at 28 days.
  • ( f_{c,t} ) = compressive strength at age t.
  • ( f_{c,28,ref}, f_{c,t,ref} ) = reference strengths from standard curves.

For detailed annexures and exact tables, refer to the official IS 11315 Part 5 document.

Popular Questions About IS 11315 Part 5

?What is the recommended procedure for using the Schmidt hammer on rock discontinuity walls?

Recommended Procedure for Using Schmidt Hammer on Rock Discontinuity Walls (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Direction: Apply the Schmidt hammer perpendicular to the discontinuity wall.
  • Surface Condition: Test the rock surface under saturated conditions for conservative results. If dry, report this fact.
  • Surface Preparation: Ensure the surface is free of loose particles at the hammer position.
  • Mineral Coatings: If thin mineral coatings exist, test on the coating surface. Describe mineralogy and estimate coating thickness and areal extent.
  • Measurement: Take multiple readings; use the mean of the highest 5 rebound numbers for reliability.
  • Orientation Correction: The rebound number varies with hammer orientation. Use Table 4 corrections if the hammer is not used vertically downwards.
Hammer OrientationCorrection to Rebound Number (r)
Vertical Downwards0 (no correction)
Vertical UpwardsSubtract 4 to 9 (varies with r)
HorizontalSubtract ~1.7 to 3.4 (varies)
45° InclinedSubtract ~0.4 to 6.9 (varies)
  • Note: Schmidt hammer rebound ranges 10–60; unsuitable for very weak rocks (<20 MPa UCS).

This test estimates Joint Wall Compressive Strength (JCS), critical for shear strength calculations using the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC).

Loading diagram...

References: IS 11315 Part 5, Clauses 3.6.1, 4.4, 4.4.4, 4.4.5 and Table 4.

?How does weathering affect the compressive strength of rock walls according to this standard?

According to IS 11315 Part 5, weathering significantly reduces the compressive strength of rock walls, especially at discontinuity surfaces:

  • Weathering affects rock walls more than interior rock blocks, weakening the walls relative to fresh rock cores.
  • Rock wall strength depends on the grade of weathering, classified in Table 1 from Fresh (Grade I) to Residual soil (Grade VI).
  • Strength decreases as weathering progresses:
    • Fresh: No weathering; strength close to intact rock.
    • Moderately to Highly weathered: Partial decomposition; strength reduced.
    • Completely weathered to Residual soil: Rock mass structure largely or fully lost; very low strength.
  • Table 3 provides approximate uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) ranges for rock materials, from very weak (<1 MPa) to extremely strong (>250 MPa).
  • Strength can be estimated using manual index tests or Schmidt hammer rebound values (Fig. 1).

Summary Table: Weathering vs Strength

Weathering GradeDescriptionApprox. UCS Range (MPa)
Fresh (I)No visible weatheringHigh (>50 MPa typical)
Moderately (III)<50% decomposed/disintegratedModerate (5-50 MPa)
Highly (IV)>50% decomposed/disintegratedLow (1-5 MPa)
Completely (V)Fully decomposed, structure intactVery low (<1 MPa)
Residual Soil (VI)Rock converted to soilVery low (<0.5 MPa)

Note: Weathering reduces rock wall strength mainly by altering discontinuity surfaces, critical for stability assessment.

Loading diagram...
?What equipment is necessary to perform the wall strength evaluation as per IS 11315 Part 5?

Equipment Required for Wall Strength Evaluation as per IS 11315 Part 5 (1987):

  • Geological hammer with one tapered point
  • Strong pen knife or similar sharp tool
  • Schmidt hammer (L-type) with:
    • Manufacturer's conversion table to correct rebound number for orientation
    • Graph (Fig. 1 in IS) to convert corrected rebound number to uniaxial compressive strength estimate
  • Equipment for measuring dry density of small rock samples:
    • Oven
    • Balance
    • Pyknometer
    • Beaker, etc.

Additional Notes:

  • Manual index tests on hand-sized freshly broken rock pieces are preferred over conventional rock cylinder tests for better representation of discontinuity wall conditions.
  • Alternatively, a standard soil mechanics pocket penetrometer can replace manual index tests for grades S1 to S6, providing direct compressive strength readings.
  • Schmidt hammer test is recommended for estimating wall strength related to shear strength calculations involving wall roughness coefficient (JRC).

Loading diagram...

This setup ensures comprehensive and representative wall strength assessment as per IS 11315 Part 5.

?How are rebound values from Schmidt hammer tests converted to joint wall compressive strength?

Conversion of Schmidt Hammer Rebound (r) to Joint Wall Compressive Strength (JCS):

  1. Parameters needed:

    • Mean Schmidt rebound value, r (from 10 tests, use mean of highest 5 for reliability).
    • Mean rock density, γ (in kN/m³).
    • Hammer orientation correction (if not vertical downwards), apply corrections from Table 4.
  2. Procedure:

    • Correct rebound value if hammer orientation ≠ vertical downwards using Table 4.
    • Use corrected rebound value and rock density on Fig. 1 (IS 11315 Part 5) to estimate JCS in MPa.
    • Note: JCS usually ~25% of intact rock strength due to weathering near discontinuities.
  3. Important Notes:

    • Rebound ranges: 10 (weak rock, <20 MPa) to 60 (very strong rock, >150 MPa).
    • Mineral coatings on joints affect JCS estimation; test coating hardness separately.
    • Schmidt hammer test reflects near-surface weathered strength controlling shear strength.

Hammer Orientation Correction (Excerpt from Table 4)

r (downwards)At -45°At +45°Horizontal (0°)
10-0.8--3.2
20-0.9-6.9-3.4
30-0.8-6.2-3.1
40-0.7-5.3-2.7
50-0.6-4.3-2.2
60-0.4-3.3-1.7

Summary:

Loading diagram...
?What are the limitations of field testing methods for rock wall strength in loose or heavily fractured rock masses?

Limitations of Field Testing Methods for Rock Wall Strength in Loose or Heavily Fractured Rock Masses (IS 11315 Part 5):

  • Discontinuity Dominance: Loose/fractured rock masses behave as discontinuous media; discontinuities largely control mechanical behavior, making direct strength measurement of intact rock less representative.

  • Thin Wall Skin: The shear strength is governed by a thin "skin" of wall rock or mineral coatings, which is difficult to test accurately by conventional methods.

  • Sampling Challenges: Manual index tests require hand-sized fresh samples from discontinuity walls; in loose/fractured masses, obtaining representative samples is difficult.

  • Test Sensitivity: Schmidt hammer and manual index tests estimate apparent strength but may not capture variability due to weathering or alteration states.

  • Conventional Tests Unsuitable: Standard tests on rock cylinders cannot test thin wall skins or coatings, limiting their applicability.

  • Interpretation Complexity: Field tests must be combined with careful geological descriptions to reliably interpret results.


Summary Table of Key Points

Limitation AspectExplanation
Discontinuity effectsStrength governed by discontinuities, not intact rock
Thin wall skinDifficult to test thin, weathered coatings accurately
Sampling representativenessHard to get fresh, representative samples in loose/fractured rock
Test method sensitivityIndex tests provide approximate strength only
Conventional test limitsCannot test thin wall rock or coatings

Loading diagram...

In essence: Field tests in such rock masses provide approximate strength values and must be supplemented by detailed geological assessment for reliable design.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 5. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required