IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) specifies methods for the quantitative description of roughness in rock mass discontinuities, focusing on measuring and characterizing surface roughness to estimate shear strength. It provides standardized procedures for field and laboratory measurements, including linear profiling, compass and disc-clinometer techniques, and photogrammetry, applicable to unfilled rock joints and discontinuities. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and researchers involved in rock slope stability, foundation design, and underground excavation projects.
Overview
IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) specifies methods for the quantitative description of roughness in rock mass discontinuities, focusing on measuring and characterizing surface roughness to estimate shear strength. It provides standardized procedures for field and laboratory measurements, including linear profiling, compass and disc-clinometer techniques, and photogrammetry, applicable to unfilled rock joints and discontinuities. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and researchers involved in rock slope stability, foundation design, and underground excavation projects.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Peak shear strength (Ti6) is estimated from joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and joint compressive strength (JCS) as:
[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
where:
Fig. 5 illustrates shear strength curves for different JCS values, guiding JRC selection.
| Class | Roughness Type | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
flowchart LR
A[Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC)] --> B[Estimate
[ \tau = \sigma_n \tan \left( 5.10910 \cdot JCS + 30^\circ \right) ]
Where:
(\tau) = shear stress (MPa)
(\sigma_n) = normal stress (MPa)
(JCS) = joint-wall compression strength (MPa)
Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) relates to roughness profiles and shear strength.
| Scale | Roughness Degree | Nomenclature Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate | Stepped, Undulating, Planar | Profiles I to IX |
| Small Scale | Rough, Smooth, Slickensided | Influences shear strength directionally |
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Energy | joule | J |
graph TD
A[Intermediate Roughness]
A --> B[Stepped]
A --> C[Undulating]
A --> D[Planar]
B --> I[Rough]
B --> II[Smooth]
B --> III[Slickensided]
C --> IV[Rough]
C --> V[Smooth]
C --> VI[Slickensided]
D --> VII[Rough]
D --> VIII[Smooth]
D --> IX[Slickensided
[ \tau_i = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \sigma_n ]
This formula estimates peak shear strength from joint roughness and compression strength.
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Energy | joule | J |
Refer to the standard for detailed unit definitions.
graph TD
A[Stepped] --> I[Rough (I)]
A --> II[Smooth (II)]
A --> III[Slickensided (III)]
B[Undulating] --> IV[Rough (IV)]
B --> V[Smooth (V)]
B --> VI[Slickensided (VI)]
C[Planar] --> VII[Rough (VII)]
C --> VIII[Smooth (VIII)]
C --> IX[Slickensided (IX)]
Note: For precise design, refer to IS 11358-1987 for definitions and IS 11315 Part 4 for detailed tables and figures.
| Small Scale \ Intermediate Scale | Stepped | Undulating | Planar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rough | I | IV | VII |
| Smooth | II | V | VIII |
| Slickensided | III | VI | IX |
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N = kg·m/s² |
| Stress | pascal | Pa = N/m² |
| Energy | joule | J = N·m |
| Power | watt | W = J/s |
graph TD
A[Small Scale] -->|Rough| B[Stepped (I)]
A -->|Smooth| C[Stepped (II)]
A -->|Slickensided| D[Stepped (III)]
IS 11315 Part 4: Methods of Measuring Roughness
Photogrammetric Method (Clause 3.10 & 4.1.6):
Linear Profiling Method (Clause 3.8):
| Method | Equipment | Measurement Scale | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photogrammetric | Camera, 1 m tapered ruler | Fine detail (mm scale) | Photos of min, modal, max roughness |
| Linear Profiling | Folding straight edge, wire, clinometer | 10 cm to meters | Wire tensioned as reference line |
flowchart LR
A[Start] --> B{Choose Method}
B -->|Photogrammetric| C[Place 1m ruler on surface]
C --> D[Take photographs]
D --> E[Measure perpendicular offsets (y)]
B -->|Linear Profiling| F[Set folding straight edge]
F --> G[Tension wire with paint marks]
G --> H[Measure offsets & dips using clinometer]
E & H --> I[Quantitative roughness description]
I --> J[Record &
IS 11315 Part 4 - Presentation of Results: Key Points
| Profile No. | Small Scale | Intermediate Scale |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
| Profile | Small Scale | Intermediate Scale | Shear Strength Ranking (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped | Highest |
| II | Smooth | Stepped | High |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped | Moderate |
| IV | Rough | Undulating | High |
| V | Smooth | Undulating | Moderate |
| VI | Slickensided |
Estimation of Shear Strength from Roughness (IS 11315 Part 4)
[ \tau_{\text{on}} = \tan \left( 20 \log_{10}(\text{JCS}) + 30^\circ \right) \sigma_n ]
| Scale / Degree | Roughness Type | Typical Profile No. |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate | Stepped, Undulating, Planar | I to IX |
| Small scale | Rough, Smooth, Slickensided | I, II, III, ... IX |
flowchart LR
A[Roughness Profile] --> B[JRC Estimation]
B --> C[Dilation Angle (i)]
C --> D[Shear Strength Calculation]
D --> E[\tau_{on} = \tan(20 \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ) \sigma_n]
This approach
IS 11315 Part 4: Notes on Equipment and Procedures - Key Points
Compass and Disc-Clinometer Method (Clause 3.9):
Photogrammetric Method (Clause 3.10):
Estimate peak shear strength from roughness profiles:
[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) ]
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Pressure/Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Time | second | s |
flowchart LR
A[Start Sampling] --> B{Choose Plate Diameter}
B --> C[40 cm Plate]
B --> D[20 cm Plate: 50 positions]
B --> E[10 cm Plate: 75 positions]
B --> F[5 cm Plate: 100 positions]
C --> G[Record Dip & Roughness]
D --> G
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H[Calculate Shear Strength using Ti6 formula]
H --> I[Analyze & Report]
This ensures accurate roughness profiling and shear strength estimation per IS 11315 Part 4.
IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) — Typical Roughness Profiles & Classification
Intermediate scale roughness (3 degrees):
Small scale roughness superimposed (3 degrees):
| Class | Small Scale Roughness | Intermediate Scale Roughness |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
graph TD
A[Intermediate Scale Roughness]
A --> B[Stepped]
A --> C[Undulating]
A --> D[Planar]
B --> I[Rough (I)]
B --> II[Smooth (II)]
B --> III[Slickensided (III)]
C --> IV[Rough (IV)]
C --> V[Smooth (V)]
C --> VI[Slickensided (VI)]
D --> VII[Rough (VII)]
Photogrammetric Method (IS 11315 Part 4) - Key Points
| Plate Diameter (cm) | Scatter of Readings | Roughness Angle |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | High | Large |
| 10 | Moderate | Moderate |
| 20 | Low | Small |
| 40 | Very Low | Very Small |
flowchart LR
A[Photogrammetric Method] --> B[Data Capture]
B --> C[Stereoscopic Plotting]
B --> D[Stereo Comparator]
C & D --> E[Coordinate Recording]
E --> F[Profile/Contour Computation]
F --> G[Surface Roughness Profiles]
G --> H[Shear Strength & Dilation Estimation]
References:
[ \tau_{16} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
Where:
(\tau_{16}) = Peak shear strength (MPa)
(JCS) = Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)
(\sigma_n) = Normal stress (MPa)
Roughness profiles correspond to Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) values: 0 (smooth) to 20 (rough).
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Time | second | s |
flowchart TD
A[Field Measurement] --> B[Photogrammetric Method]
B --> C[Coordinate Acquisition]
C --> D[Contour Maps & Profiles]
D --> E[Shear Strength Estimation]
A --> F[Compass & Disc-Clinometer]
F --> G[Dip & Dip Direction]
G --> H[Equal Area Net Plot]
For detailed equipment and procedures, refer to Part 1 of IS 11315.
IS 11315 Part 4: Interpretation of Roughness Data
Roughness scales:
Nine roughness classes (combining scales):
| Class | Small Scale | Intermediate Scale |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough | Stepped |
| II | Smooth | Stepped |
| III | Slickensided | Stepped |
| IV | Rough | Undulating |
| V | Smooth | Undulating |
| VI | Slickensided | Undulating |
| VII | Rough | Planar |
| VIII | Smooth | Planar |
| IX | Slickensided | Planar |
Shear strength ranking (assuming no mineral coatings):
I > II > III, IV > V > VI, VII > VIII > IX
Also: I > IV > VII, II > V > VIII, III > IX, VI > IX
Note: Direction of striations/slickensides affects shear strength due to anisotropy.
| Roughness Class | Description | Shear Strength (i) Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| I | Rough + Stepped | Highest |
| II | Smooth + Stepped | High |
| III | Slickensided + Stepped | Moderate |
| IV | Rough + Undulating | High |
| V | Smooth + Und |
Effect of Weathering on Discontinuity Strength (IS 11315 Part 4, Clause 6.2.2)
Residual friction angle (φr) depends on weathering degree and rock type:
Estimation method using Schmidt hammer rebound:
[ \phi_r = \phi_{unweathered} \times \frac{r}{r + r_0} ]
Where:
Shear strength formula for discontinuities (Clause 6.2.5):
[ \tau_{on} = \tan \left( 20 \cdot \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ \right) \cdot \sigma_n ]
Where:
flowchart LR
A[Unweathered Rock] -->|Schmidt rebound r0| B[Measure r0]
C[Weathered Rock] -->|Schmidt rebound r| D[Measure r]
B & D --> E[Calculate φr = φunweathered * (r / (r + r0))]
E --> F[Estimate Reduced Shear Strength]
This concise approach helps quantify weathering impact on discontinuity strength for design and analysis.
IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) - Glossary of Terms and Symbols: Key Points
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Mass | kilogram | kg |
| Time | second | s |
| Electric current | ampere | A |
| Thermodynamic temperature | kelvin | K |
| Luminous intensity | candela | cd |
| Amount of substance | mole | mol |
Supplementary Units:
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Plane angle | radian | rad |
| Solid angle | steradian | sr |
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Force | newton | N | 1 N = 1 kg·m/s² |
| Energy | joule | J | 1 J = 1 N·m |
| Power | watt | W | 1 W = 1 J/s |
| Magnetic flux | weber | Wb | 1 Wb = 1 V·s |
| Magnetic flux density | tesla | T | 1 T = 1 Wb/m² |
| Frequency | hertz | Hz | 1 Hz = 1 cycle/s (s⁻¹) |
| Electric conductance | siemens | S | 1 S = 1 A/V |
| Electromotive force | volt | V | 1 V = 1 W/A |
| Pressure, stress | pascal | Pa | 1 Pa = 1 N/m² |
Two scales of roughness:
Descriptive terms:
| Intermediate Scale | Small Scale (superimposed) |
|---|---|
| Stepped | Rough, |
IS 11315 Part 4 - Key Annexure Formulas & Tables
From Clause 5.10910:
[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]
This formula estimates peak shear strength based on joint roughness and compressive strength.
| Quantity | Unit | Symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Length | metre | m |
| Force | newton | N |
| Pressure/Stress | pascal | Pa |
| Energy | joule | J |
| Power | watt | W |
graph TD
A[JCS (MPa)] --> B[Calculate Peak Shear Strength]
B --> C[T_i6 = tan(5.10910 * JCS + 30°) * σ_n]
C --> D[Peak Shear Strength (MPa)]
E[JRC Profiles] --> F[Classify Roughness]
F --> G[Estimate Shear Strength Adjustment]
Summary: Use the tan-based formula with JCS and normal stress for peak shear strength. Refer to roughness profiles (JRC) for qualitative shear strength variation. SI units ensure consistency.
Frequently Asked
According to IS 11315 Part 4 (1987), the standard method for measuring rock discontinuity roughness involves:
This method produces a roughness profile that quantitatively describes the surface irregularities relevant to shear strength.
Loading diagram...
This approach helps in assessing shear behavior of rock joints based on surface roughness.
Influence of Roughness on Shear Strength of Rock Joints (IS 11315 Part 4)
Wall roughness significantly increases shear strength for undisplaced, interlocked, unfilled joints by providing mechanical interlock and dilation resistance.
As aperture, filling thickness, or prior displacement increase, the effect of roughness on shear strength decreases.
Roughness is quantified by the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC), estimated via:
Shear strength (τ) can be estimated using the formula:
[ \tau = \sigma_n \tan \left( 20 \log_{10} (JCS) + 30^\circ \right) ]
where:
Roughness types (A, B, C) describe varying degrees of undulation and planarity affecting strength.
Loading diagram...
Summary: Roughness enhances shear strength by interlocking joint surfaces, but its influence diminishes with increased joint aperture, filling, or displacement.
Equipment for Linear Profiling and Compass-Disc Clinometer Methods (IS 11315 Part 4):
Loading diagram...
This equipment enables accurate roughness and dip measurements essential for rock discontinuity analysis.
Photogrammetry for Assessing Roughness on Inaccessible Rock Surfaces (IS 11315 Part 4)
Loading diagram...
This method provides a quantitative, non-contact way to assess roughness where direct measurement is impossible.
Effect of Weathering on Residual Friction Angle (φr) of Rock Discontinuities (IS 11315 Part 4)
Estimation method using Schmidt hammer rebound:
[ \phi_r = \phi_{r,unweathered} \times \frac{R_w}{R_u} ]
This ratio reflects the loss in surface hardness and correlates with reduced shear strength.
| Condition | Residual Friction Angle (φr) |
|---|---|
| Unweathered | 25° – 35° (≈ 30° typical) |
| Strongly Weathered | ~15° |
Loading diagram...
Key takeaway: Weathering significantly lowers residual friction angle, reducing shear strength of rock joints. Use Schmidt rebound ratio for practical estimation.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 4. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required