IS 11315 Part 41987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in the rock mass, Part 4: Roughness

IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) specifies methods for the quantitative description of roughness in rock mass discontinuities, focusing on measuring and characterizing surface roughness to estimate shear strength. It provides standardized procedures for field and laboratory measurements, including linear profiling, compass and disc-clinometer techniques, and photogrammetry, applicable to unfilled rock joints and discontinuities. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and researchers involved in rock slope stability, foundation design, and underground excavation projects.

15Sections
63Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 11315 Part 4 PDF, IS 11315 Part 4 pdf free download, IS 11315 Part 4 free download pdf, IS11315Part4 PDF, IS-11315-Part-4 PDF, IS 11315 Part 4 1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 4:1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 4-1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) PDF, IS 11315 Part 4 1987 edition PDF, IS 11315 Part 4 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) specifies methods for the quantitative description of roughness in rock mass discontinuities, focusing on measuring and characterizing surface roughness to estimate shear strength. It provides standardized procedures for field and laboratory measurements, including linear profiling, compass and disc-clinometer techniques, and photogrammetry, applicable to unfilled rock joints and discontinuities. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and researchers involved in rock slope stability, foundation design, and underground excavation projects.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Rock Mechanics Specialists
  • Geologists
  • Civil Engineers
  • Mining Engineers
  • Structural Engineers
  • Researchers in Rock Mechanics

Key Topics Covered

Quantitative measurement of discontinuity roughness
Linear profiling method
Compass and disc-clinometer technique
Photogrammetric methods for inaccessible surfaces
Classification of roughness scales: small, intermediate, large
Estimation of shear strength from roughness profiles
Presentation and interpretation of roughness data
Effect of waviness and unevenness on shear strength
Use of roughness angles and joint roughness coefficient (JRC)
Correlation between roughness and friction angles
Photographic documentation of roughness profiles
Impact of weathering on residual friction angle

Table of Contents

0Introduction

IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) — Introduction: Key Formulas & Tables

1. Roughness and Shear Strength Estimation

  • Peak shear strength (Ti6) is estimated from joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and joint compressive strength (JCS) as:

    [ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]

    where:

    • ( T_{i6} ) = peak shear strength (MPa)
    • ( JCS ) = joint compressive strength (MPa)
    • ( \sigma_n ) = normal stress (MPa)
  • Fig. 5 illustrates shear strength curves for different JCS values, guiding JRC selection.

2. Roughness Profiles & JRC Classification (Fig. 4 & 6)

  • Roughness divided into 3 intermediate scales: Stepped, Undulating, Planar.
  • Small scale roughness: Rough, Smooth, Slickensided.
  • Nine classes (I to IX) define combined roughness types with corresponding effective roughness angles (i).
ClassRoughness TypeScale
IRoughStepped
IISmoothStepped
IIISlickensidedStepped
IVRoughUndulating
VSmoothUndulating
VISlickensidedUndulating
VIIRoughPlanar
VIIISmoothPlanar
IXSlickensidedPlanar
  • Shear strength hierarchy: (I > II > III > IV > V > VI > VII > VIII > IX).

3. SI Units & Definitions

  • Stress/pressure unit: Pascal (Pa) = N/m²
  • Force: Newton (N) = kg·m/s²
  • Energy: Joule (J) = N·m
  • Power: Watt (W) = J/s

flowchart LR
    A[Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC)] --> B[Estimate
1Scope

IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) - Scope: Key Formulas & Specifications

Scope Summary

  • Defines joint roughness, shear strength estimation, and roughness classification for rock joints.
  • Uses Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) and Joint-wall Compression Strength (JCS) for shear strength evaluation.
  • Applies SI units (Pa, MPa, N, m, etc.) as standard.

Key Formulas

  • Peak Shear Strength Estimation:

[ \tau = \sigma_n \tan \left( 5.10910 \cdot JCS + 30^\circ \right) ]

Where:

  • (\tau) = shear stress (MPa)

  • (\sigma_n) = normal stress (MPa)

  • (JCS) = joint-wall compression strength (MPa)

  • Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) relates to roughness profiles and shear strength.


Roughness Classification (Clause 5.4.2)

ScaleRoughness DegreeNomenclature Examples
IntermediateStepped, Undulating, PlanarProfiles I to IX
Small ScaleRough, Smooth, SlickensidedInfluences shear strength directionally
  • Roughness profiles influence shear strength:
    (I > II > III), (IV > V > VI), (VII > VIII > IX) (approximate ranking)

Units (SI System)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN
StresspascalPa
EnergyjouleJ

Visual Summary of Roughness Profiles

graph TD
  A[Intermediate Roughness]
  A --> B[Stepped]
  A --> C[Undulating]
  A --> D[Planar]
  B --> I[Rough]
  B --> II[Smooth]
  B --> III[Slickensided]
  C --> IV[Rough]
  C --> V[Smooth]
  C --> VI[Slickensided]
  D --> VII[Rough]
  D --> VIII[Smooth]
  D --> IX[Slickensided
2References

Key References and Formulas from IS 11315 Part 4 (1987)

1. Peak Shear Strength Estimation (Clause 5.10910)

[ \tau_i = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \sigma_n ]

  • (\tau_i) = Peak shear strength (MPa)
  • (JCS) = Joint-wall compression strength (MPa)
  • (\sigma_n) = Normal stress (MPa)

This formula estimates peak shear strength from joint roughness and compression strength.

2. Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) and Roughness Profiles (Clause 5.4.2)

  • Roughness is categorized into stepped, undulating, planar (intermediate scale) and rough, smooth, slickensided (small scale).
  • Typical roughness profiles are classified into 9 types (I to IX), influencing shear strength hierarchy:
    • (I > II > III), (IV > V > VI), (VII > VIII > IX)
  • Fig. 4 illustrates these profiles with equal vertical and horizontal scales (1 to 10 m length).

3. SI Units and Symbols

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN
StresspascalPa
EnergyjouleJ

Refer to the standard for detailed unit definitions.


Summary Diagram of Roughness Profiles (Fig. 4)

graph TD
    A[Stepped] --> I[Rough (I)]
    A --> II[Smooth (II)]
    A --> III[Slickensided (III)]
    B[Undulating] --> IV[Rough (IV)]
    B --> V[Smooth (V)]
    B --> VI[Slickensided (VI)]
    C[Planar] --> VII[Rough (VII)]
    C --> VIII[Smooth (VIII)]
    C --> IX[Slickensided (IX)]

Note: For precise design, refer to IS 11358-1987 for definitions and IS 11315 Part 4 for detailed tables and figures.

3Terminology and Definitions

IS 11315 Part 4: Terminology & Definitions - Key Points

1. Definitions

  • Clause 2.1: Definitions follow IS 11358-1987 (rock mechanics terminology).

2. Roughness Classification (Clause 5.4 & 5.4.2)

  • Roughness described on two scales:
    • Small scale (cm scale): Rough, Smooth, Slickensided
    • Intermediate scale (m scale): Stepped, Undulating, Planar
  • Combined into 9 classes (Fig. 4):
Small Scale \ Intermediate ScaleSteppedUndulatingPlanar
RoughIIVVII
SmoothIIVVIII
SlickensidedIIIVIIX
  • Shear strength ranking (assuming no mineral coatings):
    I > II > III, IV > V > VI, VII > VIII > IX

3. Shear Strength Estimation (Clause 5.10910)

  • Peak shear strength (τ) estimated from Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) and Joint Compressive Strength (JCS):
    [ \tau = \tan(5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ) \times \sigma_n ] where
    • ( \tau ) = shear strength (MPa)
    • ( JCS ) = joint compressive strength (MPa)
    • ( \sigma_n ) = normal stress (MPa)

4. Units (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN = kg·m/s²
StresspascalPa = N/m²
EnergyjouleJ = N·m
PowerwattW = J/s

Summary Diagram: Roughness Classification

graph TD
    A[Small Scale] -->|Rough| B[Stepped (I)]
    A -->|Smooth| C[Stepped (II)]
    A -->|Slickensided| D[Stepped (III)]
4Methods of Measuring Roughness

IS 11315 Part 4: Methods of Measuring Roughness

Key Methods & Equipment

  • Photogrammetric Method (Clause 3.10 & 4.1.6):

    • Uses photographic images with a 1 m graduated ruler placed visibly.
    • Ruler tapered to a point for fine detail measurement (perpendicular distances, y).
    • Suitable for minimum, modal, and maximum roughness representation.
    • Automatic profilographs offer higher accuracy but generally unnecessary for rock mechanics.
  • Linear Profiling Method (Clause 3.8):

    • Equipment:
      • Folding straight edge (≥ 2 m, graduated in mm)
      • Compass and clinometer
      • 10 m light wire/nylon with paint markings at 1 m (red) and 10 cm (blue) intervals
    • Wire tensioned between wooden blocks to form a straight reference line over undulating discontinuities.

Quantitative Description Notes (Clause 4.1.6)

  • Measure perpendicular offsets (y) from the reference line or ruler.
  • Profile offsets or steps indicating discontinuity persistence.
  • Record roughness at multiple scales:
    • <1 cm, 1-10 cm, 10-100 cm, >1 m.
  • Use clinometer on the straight edge placed at 1 m intervals down-dip to record dip variations.

Summary Table of Equipment

MethodEquipmentMeasurement ScaleNotes
PhotogrammetricCamera, 1 m tapered rulerFine detail (mm scale)Photos of min, modal, max roughness
Linear ProfilingFolding straight edge, wire, clinometer10 cm to metersWire tensioned as reference line

flowchart LR
    A[Start] --> B{Choose Method}
    B -->|Photogrammetric| C[Place 1m ruler on surface]
    C --> D[Take photographs]
    D --> E[Measure perpendicular offsets (y)]
    B -->|Linear Profiling| F[Set folding straight edge]
    F --> G[Tension wire with paint marks]
    G --> H[Measure offsets & dips using clinometer]
    E & H --> I[Quantitative roughness description]
    I --> J[Record &
5Presentation of Results

IS 11315 Part 4 - Presentation of Results: Key Points

1. Presentation Format (Clauses 5.3 & 4.3)

  • Profiles are preferred over contour diagrams for surface roughness.
  • Profiles should be plotted with 1:1 vertical to horizontal scale (no exaggeration).
  • Photogrammetric data can yield profiles or contour maps; typical contour intervals range from 1 mm to 5 cm depending on camera distance.
  • Profiles should be aligned with the direction of potential sliding.

2. Roughness Classification (Clause 5.4.2 & Fig. 4)

  • Roughness divided into:
    • Intermediate scale: Stepped, Undulating, Planar
    • Small scale: Rough (Irregular), Smooth, Slickensided
  • Nine classes of roughness profiles combining these two scales:
Profile No.Small ScaleIntermediate Scale
IRoughStepped
IISmoothStepped
IIISlickensidedStepped
IVRoughUndulating
VSmoothUndulating
VISlickensidedUndulating
VIIRoughPlanar
VIIISmoothPlanar
IXSlickensidedPlanar
  • Shear strength order: I > II > III, IV > V > VI, VII > VIII, > IX (assuming no mineral coatings).

3. Additional Presentation Requirements (Clause 5.2.2)

  • Include photographs showing minimum, modal, and maximum roughness.
  • Present pole diagrams alongside roughness data.

Summary Table for Roughness Profiles

ProfileSmall ScaleIntermediate ScaleShear Strength Ranking (approx.)
IRoughSteppedHighest
IISmoothSteppedHigh
IIISlickensidedSteppedModerate
IVRoughUndulatingHigh
VSmoothUndulatingModerate
VISlickensided
6Estimation of Shear Strength from Roughness

Estimation of Shear Strength from Roughness (IS 11315 Part 4)

Key Concepts:

  • Shear strength depends on joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and joint wall compressive strength (JCS).
  • Roughness is classified by scale and degree (stepped, undulating, planar; rough, smooth, slickensided).
  • Roughness profiles influence the dilation angle (i), affecting shear strength.

Important Formula:

[ \tau_{\text{on}} = \tan \left( 20 \log_{10}(\text{JCS}) + 30^\circ \right) \sigma_n ]

  • (\tau_{\text{on}}): Shear strength on the joint
  • (\sigma_n): Normal stress
  • JCS: Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)

Roughness Classification (Clause 5.4.2 & Fig.4):

Scale / DegreeRoughness TypeTypical Profile No.
IntermediateStepped, Undulating, PlanarI to IX
Small scaleRough, Smooth, SlickensidedI, II, III, ... IX
  • Roughness order of strength:
    (I > II > III > IV > V > VI > VII > VIII > IX)
  • Roughness angles (i) from profiles are used to estimate dilation and shear strength.

Methods for JRC Estimation:

  • Compass and disc-clinometer method: Measures roughness angles vs shear displacement.
  • Photogrammetric method: Objective profile analysis.
  • These methods generate a dilation curve (roughness angle vs displacement).

Summary:

  • Use roughness profiles and JCS to estimate shear strength.
  • Apply formula with JCS and normal stress.
  • Classify roughness to understand relative shear strength.
  • Use objective methods (clinometer, photogrammetry) for better JRC estimation.
flowchart LR
    A[Roughness Profile] --> B[JRC Estimation]
    B --> C[Dilation Angle (i)]
    C --> D[Shear Strength Calculation]
    D --> E[\tau_{on} = \tan(20 \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ) \sigma_n]

This approach

7Notes on Equipment and Procedures

IS 11315 Part 4: Notes on Equipment and Procedures - Key Points

Equipment for Roughness Sampling

  • Compass and Disc-Clinometer Method (Clause 3.9):

    • Geological compass with horizontal leveling bubble.
    • Rotatable lid with graduated hinge for dip recording.
    • Four light alloy circular plates: 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, 40 cm diameters.
  • Photogrammetric Method (Clause 3.10):

    • Equipment details in Part 1 of IS 11315.

Procedure (Clause 4.2.2)

  • Use plates of different diameters sequentially.
  • Recommended number of measurements for accuracy:
    • 20 cm plate: 50 positions
    • 10 cm plate: 75 positions
    • 5 cm plate: 100 positions

Key Formula (Clause 5.10910)

Estimate peak shear strength from roughness profiles:

[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) ]

  • JCS: Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)
  • This relates to shear stress estimation from roughness (JRC values 0 to 20).

Units (SI)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN
Pressure/StresspascalPa
Timeseconds

flowchart LR
  A[Start Sampling] --> B{Choose Plate Diameter}
  B --> C[40 cm Plate]
  B --> D[20 cm Plate: 50 positions]
  B --> E[10 cm Plate: 75 positions]
  B --> F[5 cm Plate: 100 positions]
  C --> G[Record Dip & Roughness]
  D --> G
  E --> G
  F --> G
  G --> H[Calculate Shear Strength using Ti6 formula]
  H --> I[Analyze & Report]

This ensures accurate roughness profiling and shear strength estimation per IS 11315 Part 4.

8Typical Roughness Profiles and Classification

IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) — Typical Roughness Profiles & Classification

Roughness Classification (Clause 5.4.2)

  • Intermediate scale roughness (3 degrees):

    • Stepped
    • Undulating
    • Planar
  • Small scale roughness superimposed (3 degrees):

    • Rough (Irregular)
    • Smooth
    • Slickensided

Nine Roughness Classes (Fig. 4)

ClassSmall Scale RoughnessIntermediate Scale Roughness
IRoughStepped
IISmoothStepped
IIISlickensidedStepped
IVRoughUndulating
VSmoothUndulating
VISlickensidedUndulating
VIIRoughPlanar
VIIISmoothPlanar
IXSlickensidedPlanar

Shear Strength Order (assuming no mineral coatings)

  • I > II > III > IV > V > VI > VII > VIII > IX
  • Also, I > IV > VII, II > V > VIII, III > IX, VI > IX (some inequalities less certain).

Notes

  • Profile length: 1 to 10 meters (vertical & horizontal scales equal).
  • Direction of slickensides/striations must be noted (shear strength varies with direction).
  • Profiles representing minimum, modal, and maximum roughness should be recorded and photographed (Clauses 4.1.3, 5.1.1, 5.3.2).

Summary Diagram of Roughness Classes

graph TD
    A[Intermediate Scale Roughness]
    A --> B[Stepped]
    A --> C[Undulating]
    A --> D[Planar]

    B --> I[Rough (I)]
    B --> II[Smooth (II)]
    B --> III[Slickensided (III)]

    C --> IV[Rough (IV)]
    C --> V[Smooth (V)]
    C --> VI[Slickensided (VI)]

    D --> VII[Rough (VII)]
   
9Photogrammetric Method

Photogrammetric Method (IS 11315 Part 4) - Key Points

Purpose:

  • Obtain coordinates of points on inaccessible discontinuity surfaces.
  • Compute contour maps or profiles of surface roughness.
  • Profiles preferred over contour diagrams for clarity.

Specifications & Procedures:

  • Profiles: Presented at 1:1 vertical:horizontal scale (avoid exaggerated vertical scale).
  • Contour intervals: Dependent on camera base distance; typically 1 cm to 5 cm; 1 mm possible in special cases.
  • Data collection: Use stereoscopic plotting instruments or stereo comparators with automatic recording (e.g., punched tape).
  • Surface roughness: Profiles computed in the direction of potential sliding (if known).
  • Photographs: Include surfaces with minimum, modal, and maximum roughness with a 1 m scale visible.
  • Base plate size effect:
    • Small plates → larger scatter & roughness angles.
    • Large plates → smaller scatter & roughness angles.

Equipment:

  • Refer IS 11315 Part 1 for detailed photogrammetric equipment.

Roughness Analysis:

  • Statistical analysis of coordinates estimates shear strength and dilation characteristics of unfilled joints.

Summary Table: Base Plate Size vs. Roughness Measurement Effect

Plate Diameter (cm)Scatter of ReadingsRoughness Angle
5HighLarge
10ModerateModerate
20LowSmall
40Very LowVery Small

flowchart LR
    A[Photogrammetric Method] --> B[Data Capture]
    B --> C[Stereoscopic Plotting]
    B --> D[Stereo Comparator]
    C & D --> E[Coordinate Recording]
    E --> F[Profile/Contour Computation]
    F --> G[Surface Roughness Profiles]
    G --> H[Shear Strength & Dilation Estimation]

References:

  • IS 11315 Part 4: Clauses 3.10, 4.2.4, 4.3, 5.3
  • Use profiles at 1:1 scale for reports
  • Statistical methods for roughness analysis based on recorded coordinates
10Field Measurement Techniques

IS 11315 Part 4: Field Measurement Techniques - Key Points

1. Photogrammetric Method (Clause 4.3)

  • Used for inaccessible discontinuity surfaces.
  • Coordinates of surface points obtained via terrestrial photogrammetry.
  • Minimum contour interval depends on camera distance; typical intervals: 1 mm to 5 cm.
  • Coordinates recorded using stereoscopic plotting instruments or stereo comparators.
  • Enables computation of roughness profiles and contour maps.
  • Profiles should be aligned with the potential sliding direction.
  • Statistical analysis of surface coordinates estimates shear strength and dilation characteristics.

2. Shear Strength Estimation (Clause 5.10910)

  • Peak shear strength formula from roughness profiles:

[ \tau_{16} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]

Where:

  • (\tau_{16}) = Peak shear strength (MPa)

  • (JCS) = Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)

  • (\sigma_n) = Normal stress (MPa)

  • Roughness profiles correspond to Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) values: 0 (smooth) to 20 (rough).

3. Compass and Disc-Clinometer (Clause 5.2)

  • Measures dip direction and dip.
  • Data plotted as poles on equal area nets.
  • Multiple discs combined into single contoured plots for clarity.

Summary Table: Units (SI)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN
StresspascalPa
Timeseconds

flowchart TD
    A[Field Measurement] --> B[Photogrammetric Method]
    B --> C[Coordinate Acquisition]
    C --> D[Contour Maps & Profiles]
    D --> E[Shear Strength Estimation]
    A --> F[Compass & Disc-Clinometer]
    F --> G[Dip & Dip Direction]
    G --> H[Equal Area Net Plot]

For detailed equipment and procedures, refer to Part 1 of IS 11315.

11Interpretation of Roughness Data

IS 11315 Part 4: Interpretation of Roughness Data

Key Points from Clause 5.4.2 & Fig. 4

  • Roughness scales:

    • Intermediate scale: 3 degrees — Stepped, Undulating, Planar
    • Small scale (superimposed): 3 degrees — Rough (Irregular), Smooth, Slickensided
  • Nine roughness classes (combining scales):

ClassSmall ScaleIntermediate Scale
IRoughStepped
IISmoothStepped
IIISlickensidedStepped
IVRoughUndulating
VSmoothUndulating
VISlickensidedUndulating
VIIRoughPlanar
VIIISmoothPlanar
IXSlickensidedPlanar
  • Shear strength ranking (assuming no mineral coatings):
    I > II > III, IV > V > VI, VII > VIII > IX
    Also: I > IV > VII, II > V > VIII, III > IX, VI > IX

  • Note: Direction of striations/slickensides affects shear strength due to anisotropy.

Presentation of Results (Clause 5.1.1)

  • Provide photographs showing minimum, modal, and maximum roughness.
  • Present roughness profiles with equal vertical and horizontal scales (length: 1–10 m).

Application

  • Use roughness classification to estimate shear strength and dilation of rock discontinuities.
  • Consider stiffness of surrounding rock mass, which may inhibit dilation (e.g., underground excavations).

Summary Table for Roughness and Shear Strength Interpretation

Roughness ClassDescriptionShear Strength (i) Ranking
IRough + SteppedHighest
IISmooth + SteppedHigh
IIISlickensided + SteppedModerate
IVRough + UndulatingHigh
VSmooth + Und
12Effect of Weathering on Discontinuity Strength

Effect of Weathering on Discontinuity Strength (IS 11315 Part 4, Clause 6.2.2)

  • Residual friction angle (φr) depends on weathering degree and rock type:

    • Unweathered rock: φr ≈ 25° to 35°, commonly ~30°
    • Strongly weathered rock: φr can reduce to ~15°, even without clay fillings
  • Estimation method using Schmidt hammer rebound:

    [ \phi_r = \phi_{unweathered} \times \frac{r}{r + r_0} ]

    Where:

    • ( r ) = Schmidt hammer rebound on weathered surface
    • ( r_0 ) = Schmidt hammer rebound on unweathered surface
  • Shear strength formula for discontinuities (Clause 6.2.5):

    [ \tau_{on} = \tan \left( 20 \cdot \log_{10}(JCS) + 30^\circ \right) \cdot \sigma_n ]

    Where:

    • ( \tau_{on} ) = shear strength on the discontinuity
    • ( JCS ) = Joint wall Compressive Strength (MPa)
    • ( \sigma_n ) = normal stress on discontinuity

Key Notes:

  • Roughness parameters (JRC) affect shear strength and are measured via compass, disc-clinometer, or photogrammetric methods.
  • Weathering reduces friction angle, thus lowering shear strength.
  • Use rebound ratios for quick field estimation of weathering effect.

flowchart LR
    A[Unweathered Rock] -->|Schmidt rebound r0| B[Measure r0]
    C[Weathered Rock] -->|Schmidt rebound r| D[Measure r]
    B & D --> E[Calculate φr = φunweathered * (r / (r + r0))]
    E --> F[Estimate Reduced Shear Strength]

This concise approach helps quantify weathering impact on discontinuity strength for design and analysis.

13Glossary of Terms and Symbols

IS 11315 Part 4 (1987) - Glossary of Terms and Symbols: Key Points


1. Basic Units and Symbols (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
Masskilogramkg
Timeseconds
Electric currentampereA
Thermodynamic temperaturekelvinK
Luminous intensitycandelacd
Amount of substancemolemol

Supplementary Units:

QuantityUnitSymbol
Plane angleradianrad
Solid anglesteradiansr

2. Derived Units

QuantityUnitSymbolDefinition
ForcenewtonN1 N = 1 kg·m/s²
EnergyjouleJ1 J = 1 N·m
PowerwattW1 W = 1 J/s
Magnetic fluxweberWb1 Wb = 1 V·s
Magnetic flux densityteslaT1 T = 1 Wb/m²
FrequencyhertzHz1 Hz = 1 cycle/s (s⁻¹)
Electric conductancesiemensS1 S = 1 A/V
Electromotive forcevoltV1 V = 1 W/A
Pressure, stresspascalPa1 Pa = 1 N/m²

3. Roughness Classification for Shear Strength (Clause 5.4)

  • Two scales of roughness:

    • Small scale (cm range)
    • Intermediate scale (m range)
  • Descriptive terms:

Intermediate ScaleSmall Scale (superimposed)
SteppedRough,
14Annexures and Illustrations

IS 11315 Part 4 - Key Annexure Formulas & Tables


1. Peak Shear Strength Estimation

From Clause 5.10910:

[ T_{i6} = \tan \left( 5.10910 \times JCS + 30^\circ \right) \times \sigma_n ]

  • (T_{i6}) = Peak shear strength (MPa)
  • (JCS) = Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)
  • (\sigma_n) = Normal stress (MPa)

This formula estimates peak shear strength based on joint roughness and compressive strength.


2. Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) Profiles

  • Roughness profiles are categorized into 9 classes (Fig. 4):
    • Intermediate scale: Stepped, Undulating, Planar
    • Small scale: Rough, Smooth, Slickensided
  • Roughness affects shear strength; higher JRC means higher shear strength.
  • Typical JRC ranges are illustrated in Fig. 6.

3. SI Units Table

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN
Pressure/StresspascalPa
EnergyjouleJ
PowerwattW

4. Roughness Influence Hierarchy

  • Shear strength order:
    ( I > II > III, IV > V > VI, VII > VIII > IX )
  • Roughness and striation direction affect strength.

graph TD
  A[JCS (MPa)] --> B[Calculate Peak Shear Strength]
  B --> C[T_i6 = tan(5.10910 * JCS + 30°) * σ_n]
  C --> D[Peak Shear Strength (MPa)]
  E[JRC Profiles] --> F[Classify Roughness]
  F --> G[Estimate Shear Strength Adjustment]

Summary: Use the tan-based formula with JCS and normal stress for peak shear strength. Refer to roughness profiles (JRC) for qualitative shear strength variation. SI units ensure consistency.

Popular Questions About IS 11315 Part 4

?What are the standard methods for measuring rock discontinuity roughness according to IS 11315 Part 4?

According to IS 11315 Part 4 (1987), the standard method for measuring rock discontinuity roughness involves:

  • Using either a 2 m straight edge or a 10 m wire (or sections thereof), placed parallel to the mean sliding direction on the discontinuity surface.
  • The straight edge or wire must rest on the highest points of the discontinuity and be as straight as possible.
  • Perpendicular distances (y) from the straight edge/wire to the discontinuity surface are measured at various tangential distances (x) along the length.
  • The interval ( x ) is flexible but typically about 2% of the total length (e.g., 5 cm intervals for 2 m length) to capture small steps or features.
  • Measurements are recorded to the nearest 1 mm.

This method produces a roughness profile that quantitatively describes the surface irregularities relevant to shear strength.

Loading diagram...

This approach helps in assessing shear behavior of rock joints based on surface roughness.

?How does roughness influence the shear strength of rock joints?

Influence of Roughness on Shear Strength of Rock Joints (IS 11315 Part 4)

  • Wall roughness significantly increases shear strength for undisplaced, interlocked, unfilled joints by providing mechanical interlock and dilation resistance.

  • As aperture, filling thickness, or prior displacement increase, the effect of roughness on shear strength decreases.

  • Roughness is quantified by the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC), estimated via:

    • Compass and disc-clinometer method (generates a dilation curve of roughness angles vs shear displacement),
    • Photogrammetric methods.
  • Shear strength (τ) can be estimated using the formula:

    [ \tau = \sigma_n \tan \left( 20 \log_{10} (JCS) + 30^\circ \right) ]

    where:

    • σ_n = normal stress,
    • JCS = Joint Compressive Strength.
  • Roughness types (A, B, C) describe varying degrees of undulation and planarity affecting strength.

Loading diagram...

Summary: Roughness enhances shear strength by interlocking joint surfaces, but its influence diminishes with increased joint aperture, filling, or displacement.

?What equipment is required for the linear profiling and compass-disc clinometer methods?

Equipment for Linear Profiling and Compass-Disc Clinometer Methods (IS 11315 Part 4):

Linear Profiling Method (Clause 3.8)

  • Folding straight edge: ≥ 2 m length, graduated in mm
  • Compass and clinometer
  • 10 m light wire or nylon line:
    • Paint markings at 1 m (red) and 10 cm (blue) intervals
    • Ends fixed to small wooden blocks or handles for tensioning

Compass and Disc-Clinometer Method (Clause 3.9)

  • Geological compass with:
    • Horizontal levelling bubble
    • Rotatable lid connected by a graduated hinge for dip measurement
  • Four thin circular plates (light alloy) of diameters:
    • 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, 40 cm
    • Plates fixed sequentially to compass lid for roughness sampling

Summary Diagram of Equipment Setup

Loading diagram...

This equipment enables accurate roughness and dip measurements essential for rock discontinuity analysis.

?How can photogrammetry be used to assess roughness on inaccessible rock surfaces?

Photogrammetry for Assessing Roughness on Inaccessible Rock Surfaces (IS 11315 Part 4)

  • Method: Terrestrial photogrammetry captures coordinates of multiple points on inaccessible discontinuity surfaces using stereoscopic plotting instruments or stereo comparators.
  • Data Output: Coordinates are recorded (e.g., punched tape) and used to generate contour maps or roughness profiles, especially along the potential sliding direction.
  • Resolution: Minimum contour intervals depend on camera distance; achievable intervals range from 1 mm (rare) to 1 cm or 5 cm (typical).
  • Analysis: Profiles help estimate shear strength and dilation via statistical analysis of surface coordinates.
  • Presentation: Photographs with a 1 m graduated rule visible should be taken to represent minimum, modal, and maximum roughness.
  • Additional Notes:
    • Roughness can be profiled in 3D if sliding direction is unknown.
    • Wave-length and amplitude of surface features can be measured at multiple scales (<1 cm to >1 m).
    • Large surfaces can be surveyed using a straight edge and clinometer for dip measurements.
Loading diagram...

This method provides a quantitative, non-contact way to assess roughness where direct measurement is impossible.

?How does weathering affect the residual friction angle of rock discontinuities?

Effect of Weathering on Residual Friction Angle (φr) of Rock Discontinuities (IS 11315 Part 4)

  • Residual friction angle (φr) depends strongly on the degree of weathering of discontinuity walls.
  • For unweathered rock walls, φr typically ranges from 25° to 35°, commonly near 30°.
  • For strongly weathered walls, φr can reduce drastically to about 15°, even without clay fillings.
  • This reduction occurs because weathering weakens the rock surface, reducing interlocking and friction.

Estimation method using Schmidt hammer rebound:

[ \phi_r = \phi_{r,unweathered} \times \frac{R_w}{R_u} ]

  • ( R_w ): Schmidt hammer rebound on weathered surface
  • ( R_u ): Schmidt hammer rebound on unweathered surface

This ratio reflects the loss in surface hardness and correlates with reduced shear strength.


Summary Table

ConditionResidual Friction Angle (φr)
Unweathered25° – 35° (≈ 30° typical)
Strongly Weathered~15°

Loading diagram...

Key takeaway: Weathering significantly lowers residual friction angle, reducing shear strength of rock joints. Use Schmidt rebound ratio for practical estimation.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 4. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required