IS 11315 Part 31987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in the rock mass, Part 3: Persistence

IS 11315 Part 3 (1987) provides a standardized method for quantitatively describing the persistence of discontinuities in rock masses. It guides engineers in assessing the trace length and continuity of rock discontinuities, which are critical for evaluating rock stability in slopes, tunnels, and foundations. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and civil engineers involved in rock mass characterization and stability analysis.

7Sections
85Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 11315 Part 3 PDF, IS 11315 Part 3 pdf free download, IS 11315 Part 3 free download pdf, IS11315Part3 PDF, IS-11315-Part-3 PDF, IS 11315 Part 3 1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 3:1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 3-1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 3 (1987) PDF, IS 11315 Part 3 1987 edition PDF, IS 11315 Part 3 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 11315 Part 3 (1987) provides a standardized method for quantitatively describing the persistence of discontinuities in rock masses. It guides engineers in assessing the trace length and continuity of rock discontinuities, which are critical for evaluating rock stability in slopes, tunnels, and foundations. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers, rock mechanics specialists, and civil engineers involved in rock mass characterization and stability analysis.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Rock Mechanics Specialists
  • Civil Engineers
  • Mining Engineers
  • Tunnel Designers
  • Slope Stability Analysts
  • Foundation Engineers

Key Topics Covered

Definition and classification of discontinuities
Quantitative measurement of persistence
Systematic, sub-systematic, and non-systematic discontinuity sets
Use of termination indices
Field measurement procedures
Interpretation of persistence data
Importance of persistence in rock slope and dam foundation stability
Application to tunneling and excavation projects
Presentation and reporting of persistence results
Use of sketches and block diagrams for visualization
Correlation with other discontinuity parameters
Rounding and reporting conventions

Table of Contents

0Introduction

IS 11315 Part 3 - Introduction: Key Formulas, Tables & Specs


1. Persistence of Failure Surfaces (Clause 5.4)

  • Persistence (%) of potential failure surfaces, including stepped surfaces, should be estimated conservatively.
  • Round persistence upwards to nearest 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%).
  • Assume 100% persistence when in doubt for safety.

2. Persistence Classification (Clause 4.3)

Persistence LevelLength (m)
Very Low< 1
Low1 – 3
Medium3 – 10
High10 – 20
Very High> 20

3. Shear Strength Estimation of Intact Rock Bridges

Using Mohr envelope (linear shear strength):

[ C = \frac{( \sigma_c - \sigma_t )}{6} ]

Where:

  • (C) = cohesion due to intact rock bridges
  • (\sigma_c) = uniaxial compressive strength (UCS)
  • (\sigma_t) = tensile strength (assumed (\sigma_c / \sigma_t = 9))

Interpretation: Cohesion ≈ 1/6 of UCS.


4. Units (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
Masskilogramkg
Timeseconds
ForcenewtonN
Pressure, stresspascalPa
EnergyjouleJ

5. Important Notes

  • Persistence estimates are engineering judgement-based; bias towards conservatism.
  • Stepped failure surfaces (2D & 3D) may form when persistence < 100%.
  • Intact rock bridges significantly increase shear strength.

flowchart TD
    A[Discontinuity Persistence] --> B{Persistence Level}
    B -->|<1 m| C[Very Low]
    B -->|1-3 m| D[Low]
    B -->
1Scope

IS 11315 Part 3 — Scope: Key Specifications & Tables

1. Scope Summary

  • Defines persistence of potential failure surfaces (including stepped surfaces) in rock mass investigations.
  • Persistence should be estimated and rounded upwards to the next multiple of 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%).

2. Persistence Classification (Clause 4.3)

Persistence LevelLength (m)
Very Low Persistence< 1
Low Persistence1 – 3
Medium Persistence3 – 10
High Persistence10 – 20
Very High Persistence> 20

3. Units (SI Units)

  • Length: metre (m)
  • Force: newton (N) = 1 kg·m/s²
  • Pressure/Stress: pascal (Pa) = 1 N/m²
  • Energy: joule (J) = 1 N·m
  • Power: watt (W) = 1 J/s

4. Rounding Rule (Clause 5.4)

  • Final values must be rounded according to IS 2-1960 (standard rounding).

Visual Summary: Persistence Levels

graph LR
    A[Very Low <1m] --> B[Low 1-3m]
    B --> C[Medium 3-10m]
    C --> D[High 10-20m]
    D --> E[Very High >20m]

Use this scope to estimate and classify rock discontinuity persistence consistently.

2Definitions

IS 11315 Part 3 — Key Definitions & Specifications

Persistence of Discontinuities (Clause 4.3 & 5.4)

Persistence refers to the length of potential failure surfaces in rock masses, categorized as:

Persistence LevelLength (m)
Very Low< 1
Low1 – 3
Medium3 – 10
High10 – 20
Very High> 20
  • Persistence estimates should be rounded upwards to the nearest 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%).

Units & Symbols (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbolDefinition
Lengthmetrem
Masskilogramkg
Timeseconds
ForcenewtonN1 N = 1 kg·m/s²
Pressure, StresspascalPa1 Pa = 1 N/m²
EnergyjouleJ1 J = 1 N·m
PowerwattW1 W = 1 J/s

Notes:

  • Definitions align with IS 11358-1986.
  • Rounding of results follows IS 2-1960.
  • Persistence relates to rock discontinuities affecting stability.

flowchart LR
    A[Discontinuity Persistence] --> B{Length (m)}
    B -->|<1| VeryLow[Very Low Persistence]
    B -->|1-3| Low[Low Persistence]
    B -->|3-10| Medium[Medium Persistence]
    B -->|10-20| High[High Persistence]
    B -->|>20| VeryHigh[Very High Persistence]

This concise summary covers key definitions, units, and persistence classification per IS 11315 Part 3.

3General Principles

IS 11315 Part 3: General Principles — Key Formulas, Tables, and Specifications

1. Persistence of Failure Surfaces (Clause 5.4):

  • Estimate persistence of potential failure surfaces (including stepped surfaces).
  • Round estimates upwards to the next multiple of 10%.
    • Example: 92% → 100%.

2. Persistence Classification (Clause 4.3):

Persistence LevelLength (m)
Very Low Persistence< 1 m
Low Persistence1 – 3 m
Medium Persistence3 – 10 m
High Persistence10 – 20 m
Very High Persistence> 20 m

3. SI Units and Definitions:

QuantityUnitSymbolDefinition
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN1 N = 1 kg·m/s²
Pressure, StresspascalPa1 Pa = 1 N/m²
EnergyjouleJ1 J = 1 N·m
PowerwattW1 W = 1 J/s
FrequencyhertzHz1 Hz = 1 s⁻¹

4. Rounding Off (Clause 0.6):

  • Follow IS 2-1960 for rounding final values.

flowchart TD
    A[Estimate Persistence] --> B{Round Up?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Round to next 10%]
    B -- No --> D[Use exact value]
    C --> E[Classify Persistence]
    D --> E
    E --> F{Persistence Level}
    F -->|<1 m| G[Very Low Persistence]
    F -->|1-3 m| H[Low Persistence]
    F -->|3-10 m| I[Medium Persistence]
    F -->|10-20 m| J[High Persistence]
    F -->|>20 m| K[Very High Persistence]

Summary:

4Procedure

IS 11315 Part 3: Procedure Key Points

Persistence Estimation (Clause 5.4)

  • Persistence of potential failure surfaces (including stepped surfaces) should be estimated.
  • Round the estimate upwards to the next multiple of 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%).

Persistence Classification (Clause 4.3)

Persistence LevelPersistence Length
Very Low Persistence< 1 m
Low Persistence1 - 3 m
Medium Persistence3 - 10 m
High Persistence10 - 20 m
Very High Persistence> 20 m

Units and Symbols (SI Units)

  • Length: m (metre)
  • Force: N (newton) = 1 kg·m/s²
  • Pressure/Stress: Pa (pascal) = 1 N/m²
  • Energy: J (joule) = 1 N·m
  • Power: W (watt) = 1 J/s

Rounding Off (Clause None: 0.6)

  • Follow IS 2-1960 for rounding off test or analysis results.

Summary Diagram: Persistence Classification

graph LR
A[Very Low Persistence] -->|<1 m| B[Low Persistence]
B -->|1-3 m| C[Medium Persistence]
C -->|3-10 m| D[High Persistence]
D -->|10-20 m| E[Very High Persistence]
E -->|>20 m| F[Failure Surface]

This classification helps in assessing the continuity and potential impact of discontinuities in rock or soil mass during stability analysis.

5Presentation of Results

IS 11315 Part 3 — Presentation of Results: Key Points

1. Persistence Estimation (Clause 5.4)

  • Persistence of potential failure surfaces (including stepped) should be estimated.
  • Round persistence upwards to the nearest multiple of 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%).
  • Conservative approach: assume 100% persistence if uncertain, as intact rock bridges contribute significantly to shear strength.

2. Persistence Categories (Clause 4.3)

Persistence LevelLength (m)
Very low persistence< 1 m
Low persistence1 – 3 m
Medium persistence3 – 10 m
High persistence10 – 20 m
Very high persistence> 20 m

3. Shear Strength of Intact Rock Bridges

  • Cohesion, C, estimated from Mohr envelope assuming linear shear strength:

    [ C = \frac{F_c - \sigma_t}{6} ]

    where:

    • (F_c) = uniaxial compressive strength
    • (\sigma_t) = tensile strength (assumed (F_c / \sigma_t = 9))
  • This implies cohesion ≈ 1/6 of unconfined compressive strength.

4. Units (SI System)

  • Length: metre (m)
  • Force: newton (N) = kg·m/s²
  • Pressure/Stress: pascal (Pa) = N/m²

5. Reporting

  • Round off results per IS 2-1960 rounding rules.

flowchart LR
    A[Discontinuity Persistence Estimation] --> B{Persistence Level?}
    B -->|<1 m| C[Very Low Persistence]
    B -->|1-3 m| D[Low Persistence]
    B -->|3-10 m| E[Medium Persistence]
    B -->|10-20 m| F[High Persistence]
    B -->|>20 m| G[Very High Persistence]
    A --> H[Round Persistence to nearest 10%]
    H --> I[Assume 100% if uncertain]
    I --> J[Calculate
6Notes and Recommendations

Key Notes & Recommendations from IS 11315 Part 3 (1987):

  • Persistence Estimation (Clause 5.4):

    • Persistence of failure surfaces (including stepped) should be estimated and rounded up to the nearest 10%.
    • Example: 92% persistence → assume 100%.
  • Discontinuity Data (Clause 4.5):

    • Record termination data ((x, r \text{ or } d)) for each discontinuity end, plus length in meters.
  • Persistence & Shear Strength:

    • Persistence estimates should be conservative (close to 100%) because intact rock bridges contribute significantly to shear strength.
    • Shear strength due to intact bridges can be approximated by:

    [ C = \frac{F_c - \sigma_t}{6} ]

    where:
    (F_c) = uniaxial compressive strength,
    (\sigma_t) = tensile strength (assumed (F_c / \sigma_t = 9)).

  • Units:

    • Use SI units as per the table (e.g., length in meters, force in newtons, stress in pascals).

Summary Table: Persistence & Cohesion Estimation

ParameterSymbolTypical Value/Formula
Uniaxial compressive strength(F_c)Given by rock test
Tensile strength(\sigma_t)(F_c / 9) (assumed)
Cohesion from intact bridges(C)(C = \frac{F_c - \sigma_t}{6})
Persistence roundingRound up to nearest 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%)

flowchart LR
    A[Discontinuity Data] --> B[Record termination data (x, r or d)]
    B --> C[Estimate persistence]
    C --> D{Is persistence < 100%?}
    D -- Yes --> E[Consider stepped failure surfaces]
    D -- No --> F[Assume full persistence]
    E --> G[Estimate shear strength using Mohr envelope]
    F --> G
    G --> H[Calculate cohesion

Popular Questions About IS 11315 Part 3

?How is persistence of rock discontinuities quantitatively measured according to IS 11315 Part 3?

According to IS 11315 Part 3 (1987), persistence of rock discontinuities is quantitatively measured by:

  • Recording termination data (coordinates or description) for each end of the discontinuity.
  • Measuring the trace length (in meters) between terminations.
  • Using statistical analysis (extreme value statistics) if full size distribution is known, to estimate the probability of occurrence of a certain discontinuity size.
  • Persistence is interpreted as the percentage of continuous length of a discontinuity relative to the rock mass.

Key points:

  • Discontinuities with visible terminations are usually smaller.
  • Conservative engineering judgment should be applied, often assuming near 100% persistence for safety.
  • Persistence influences failure modes:
    • 100% persistence → plane failure.
    • Less than 100% → stepped failure with intact rock bridges.
  • Shear strength from intact rock bridges can be estimated by:

[ C = \frac{F_c}{6} ]

Where:

  • (F_c) = uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock,
  • Assuming (\sigma_c / \sigma_t = 9) (compressive to tensile strength ratio).

Loading diagram...

Summary: Persistence = measured trace length between terminations, statistically analyzed, and conservatively interpreted for design safety.

?What are the classifications of discontinuity sets based on persistence?

Based on IS 11315 Part 3, discontinuity sets are classified by persistence (trace length observed on rock exposure) as follows:

Classifications of Discontinuity Sets by Persistence

ClassificationDescriptionTypical Trace Length (measured with ≥10 m tape)
PersistentLong, continuous discontinuities extending over large areas or penetration lengthsTypically > 10 m
Sub-persistentModerate length discontinuities, less continuousSeveral meters, but less than persistent
Non-persistentShort, discontinuities terminating quickly in rock or against othersUsually < 1 m

Notes:

  • Persistence reflects areal extent or penetration length of discontinuities.
  • Termination in solid rock or intersection with other discontinuities reduces persistence.
  • These terms are also referred to as systematic, sub-systematic, and non-systematic in some clauses.
  • Use field sketches or block diagrams to aid classification visually.
Loading diagram...

This classification helps in rock mass characterization and engineering design.

?How does persistence affect the stability assessment of rock slopes and tunnels?

Effect of Persistence on Stability Assessment (IS 11315 Part 3)

  • Persistence measures how far a discontinuity extends without termination in solid rock or against other discontinuities.
  • In rock slopes and dam foundations, high persistence of unfavorable discontinuities increases the likelihood of large-scale failure surfaces developing, as failure can propagate through multiple blocks without "down-stopping."
  • Persistence controls the potential for tension crack development behind slope crests, influencing slope stability.
  • For tunnels, failure may be localized; persistence over a few blocks is critical if other failure conditions exist (e.g., smooth or clay-filled joints, multiple joint sets).
  • Persistence is often difficult to measure accurately due to limited exposure; estimation may use dip and strike lengths and probability theory.
  • Typical significance:
    • 5-10 m persistence in tunnels can be critical.
    • Longer persistence needed to affect large rock slopes or dam abutments.
Loading diagram...

Summary: Persistence is a key parameter controlling failure surface development and must be carefully assessed for reliable stability analysis.

?What field methods and tools are recommended for measuring discontinuity persistence?

IS 11315 Part 3 - Measuring Discontinuity Persistence

Recommended Field Methods & Tools:

  • Measuring Tape: Use a tape of at least 10 m length to measure the trace length of discontinuities on rock exposures (Clause 3.6).
  • Visual Observation: Identify and classify discontinuities as systematic, sub-systematic, or non-systematic based on relative persistence.
  • Trace Length Measurement: Measure the length of visible discontinuity traces on exposed rock surfaces.
  • Dip and Strike Lengths: Where possible, record dip and strike lengths to estimate persistence along discontinuity planes using probabilistic methods (Clause 3.5).
  • Note Terminations: Observe where discontinuities terminate against solid rock or other discontinuities to assess actual persistence (Clause 0.5).

Important Notes:

  • Persistence is the modal trace length observed, indicating the areal extent or penetration length.
  • Field measurements can be uncertain due to limited exposure size.
  • Persistence classification helps in rock mass characterization and stability analysis.
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures reliable persistence data for rock mass evaluation per IS 11315 Part 3.

?How should persistence data be presented and interpreted in engineering reports?

Presentation and Interpretation of Persistence Data (IS 11315 Part 3)

  • Persistence Definition: Persistence is the observed trace length of discontinuities, indicating their areal extent or penetration length in rock exposures (Clauses 0.5, 3.6).

  • Data Recording: Record termination data (x, r or d) for each end of discontinuities along with their length in meters (Clause 4.5).

  • Estimation: Persistence of potential failure surfaces, including stepped surfaces, should be estimated and rounded upwards to the nearest 10% (e.g., 92% → 100%) for conservatism (Clause 5.4).

  • Interpretation Notes:

    • Persistence less than 100% may cause stepped failure surfaces with intact rock bridges contributing significantly to shear strength.
    • When uncertain, assume 100% persistence to avoid underestimating shear strength.
    • Use engineering judgment weighted conservatively.
  • Shear Strength Estimation: Cohesion from intact rock bridges can be approximated as:

    [ C = \frac{F_c}{6} ]

    where (F_c) = uniaxial compressive strength (assuming ( \sigma_c / \sigma_t = 9 )).


Summary Table for Persistence Reporting

ParameterUnitNotes
Discontinuity lengthmetersMeasured with tape ≥10 m
Termination data (x, r, d)metersRecorded for each discontinuity end
Persistence estimate%Rounded up to nearest 10%, conservatively

Loading diagram...

This approach ensures conservative, reliable interpretation of persistence data in rock engineering reports per IS 11315 Part 3.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 3. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required