IS 11315 Part 21987AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Method for the quantitative description of discontinuities in the rock mass, Part 2: Spacing

IS 11315 Part 2 (1987) specifies a standardized method for quantitatively describing the spacing of discontinuities in rock masses. It provides engineers and geologists with procedures to measure, record, and statistically present the distance between adjacent discontinuities, which critically influences rock mass behavior and engineering design. This standard is essential for professionals involved in rock mechanics, geotechnical investigations, and foundation engineering to assess rock stability and permeability.

6Sections
79Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1987Edition
Rock MechanicsCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 11315 Part 2 PDF, IS 11315 Part 2 pdf free download, IS 11315 Part 2 free download pdf, IS11315Part2 PDF, IS-11315-Part-2 PDF, IS 11315 Part 2 1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 2:1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 2-1987 PDF, IS 11315 Part 2 (1987) PDF, IS 11315 Part 2 1987 edition PDF, IS 11315 Part 2 edition 1987 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 11315 Part 2 (1987) specifies a standardized method for quantitatively describing the spacing of discontinuities in rock masses. It provides engineers and geologists with procedures to measure, record, and statistically present the distance between adjacent discontinuities, which critically influences rock mass behavior and engineering design. This standard is essential for professionals involved in rock mechanics, geotechnical investigations, and foundation engineering to assess rock stability and permeability.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Rock Mechanics Specialists
  • Civil Engineers
  • Mining Engineers
  • Geologists
  • Foundation Engineers
  • Hydrogeologists

Key Topics Covered

Definition and significance of discontinuity spacing
Measurement techniques using tape, compass, and clinometer
Statistical presentation of spacing data including histograms
Classification of spacing ranges (very close to very wide)
Calculation of modal, minimum, and maximum spacing
Frequency of discontinuities as inverse of spacing
Impact of spacing on rock block size and mechanical behavior
Influence of spacing on rock mass permeability and seepage
Correction for directional bias in measurements
Use of drill core and borehole techniques for spacing estimation
Relationship between seismic velocity and discontinuity frequency
Exclusion of blast-induced fractures from spacing analysis

Table of Contents

1Scope

Scope & Key Specifications from IS 11315 Part 2 (1987):

  • Purpose: Defines methods to measure and present spacing of rock discontinuities (joints, fractures).

  • Spacing Classification (Clause 5.1):

DescriptionSpacing (S)
Very close spacing< 60 mm
Close spacing60 - 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 - 600 mm
Wide spacing600 - 2000 mm
Very wide spacing> 2000 mm
  • Modal Spacing (Clause 4.4):
    The most common spacing ( S_m ) is calculated from measured distances ( d_m ) and presented as histograms (Fig. 2).
    Note: Use measuring tape and compass for accuracy; visual judgement acceptable for experienced geologists.

  • Measurement Notes:

    • Exclude blast damage fractures.
    • Variability in spacing can be shown by block diagrams or histograms.
    • Where exposures are limited, seismic refraction or borehole techniques can estimate spacing.
flowchart LR
    A[Rock Exposure] --> B[Measure Discontinuity Spacing]
    B --> C[Record Min, Modal, Max Spacing]
    C --> D[Classify Spacing (Very Close to Very Wide)]
    D --> E[Present Results as Histograms or Block Diagrams]
    E --> F[Use for Rock Mass Characterization]

Summary: IS 11315 Part 2 standardizes discontinuity spacing measurement, classification, and presentation to aid rock mass evaluation for engineering purposes.

2References

IS 11315 Part 2 - Key References and Specifications

1. Spacing Classification (Clause 5.1, Table 5)

DescriptionSpacing (S)
Very close spacing< 60 mm
Close spacing60 - 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 - 600 mm
Wide spacing600 - 2000 mm
Very wide spacing> 2000 mm
  • Record minimum (S_min), modal (S), and maximum (S_max) spacing for each discontinuity set.
  • Present spacing distributions as histograms (see Fig. 2 in the standard).

2. Importance of Spacing (Clause 3.3)

  • Spacing critically affects deformation potential.
  • Low shear strength + multiple joint sets + appropriate spacing → slip and deformation likely.

3. Definitions (Clause 2.1)

  • Terms as per IS 11358-1986 apply.

Summary Diagram: Discontinuity Spacing Categories

graph LR
    A[Discontinuity Spacing] --> B[Very Close < 60 mm]
    A --> C[Close 60-200 mm]
    A --> D[Moderate 200-600 mm]
    A --> E[Wide 600-2000 mm]
    A --> F[Very Wide > 2000 mm]

Note: Use these spacing categories to assess rock mass behavior and deformation risks in structural design.

3Significance of Spacing in Rock Mass

Significance of Spacing in Rock Mass (IS 11315 Part 2)

  • Spacing refers to the distance between discontinuities (joints, fractures) in a rock mass.
  • According to Clause 3.3, spacing is critical when:
    • Shear strength is low.
    • Multiple joint sets exist, enabling slip or deformation.
  • Smaller spacing → more discontinuities → weaker rock mass behavior.
  • Larger spacing → more intact rock behavior.

Key Points:

  • Spacing influences rock mass deformability and strength.
  • Essential for mechanical behavior prediction and design.
  • Must be measured accurately and rounded per IS rules.

Typical Parameters:

ParameterDescription
( S )Average spacing between joints
( n )Number of discontinuities per unit length ( ( n = \frac{1}{S} ) )
Joint setsNumber and orientation of discontinuity sets

Formula:

[ S = \frac{L}{N} ]

  • (L) = length of rock mass segment measured
  • (N) = number of discontinuities counted

flowchart LR
    A[Rock Mass] --> B[Discontinuities]
    B --> C[Spacing (S)]
    C --> D[Mechanical Behavior]
    D --> E{Low Shear Strength + Multiple Joint Sets}
    E --> F[Increased Deformation Risk]

Summary: Proper quantification of spacing is vital for rock stability analysis and design in geotechnical engineering.

4Measurement Procedure

Measurement Procedure for Discontinuity Spacing (IS 11315 Part 2)

  • Tape Positioning (Clause 4.1):
    Hold the measuring tape approximately perpendicular to the discontinuity set on the rock exposure to measure spacing ( S ). Correct for directional bias if tape is not perpendicular.

  • Spacing Categories (Clause 5.1):

DescriptionSpacing ( S )
Very close spacing< 60 mm
Close spacing60 - 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 - 600 mm
Wide spacing600 - 2000 mm
Very wide spacing> 2000 mm
  • Modal Spacing Calculation (Clause 4.4):
    The most common (modal) spacing ( S_{model} ) is calculated from measured distances ( d_m ). Present data as histograms (Fig. 2) showing minimum, modal, and maximum spacing.

  • Additional Notes:

    • Exclude blast damage fractures.
    • Average modal spacings represent typical block size if persistence is assumed.
    • Use seismic refraction or borehole techniques if surface exposure is limited.
  • Rounding Off Results:
    Follow IS:2-1960 for rounding final values.

flowchart LR
    A[Measure spacing with tape] --> B{Is tape perpendicular?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Record distances between discontinuities]
    B -- No --> D[Apply directional bias correction]
    D --> C
    C --> E[Calculate modal spacing \(S_{model}\)]
    E --> F[Classify spacing category]
    F --> G[Present histogram of spacing]

This ensures standardized, precise reporting of discontinuity spacing per IS 11315 Part 2.

5Presentation of Results

IS 11315 Part 2 - Presentation of Results for Discontinuity Spacing


Key Specifications:

  • Spacing categories (Clause 5.1):
DescriptionSpacing (S)
Very close spacing< 60 mm
Close spacing60 - 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 - 600 mm
Wide spacing600 - 2000 mm
Very wide spacing> 2000 mm

Important Formulas:

  • Modal spacing (Sₘ) is the most common spacing measured in the set (Clause 4.4):

[ S_m = d_m ]

where (d_m) is the mode of the measured spacing distribution.

  • Average block size can be approximated by the average of modal spacings (S_1, S_2, \ldots) assuming persistence.

Presentation Methods:

  • Use histograms for each discontinuity set showing frequency distribution of spacing (Fig. 2).
  • Overlay frequency curves to visualize modal values and dispersion.
  • Mean spacing may be used instead of modal spacing for samples with multiple or poorly defined modes.

Notes:

  • Exclude blast-induced fractures.
  • Measurement tools: tape and compass recommended but visual judgement allowed.
  • For limited exposure, use seismic refraction or borehole techniques to estimate spacing.

Diagram Concept (Histogram Example):

barChart
    title Discontinuity Spacing Histogram
    x-axis Spacing (mm)
    y-axis Frequency
    VeryClose <60 : 15
    Close 60-200 : 30
    Moderate 200-600 : 40
    Wide 600-2000 : 10
    VeryWide >2000 : 5

This approach ensures clarity in reporting discontinuity spacing for rock mass characterization per IS 11315 Part 2.

6Notes on Measurement and Interpretation

IS 11315 Part 2: Notes on Measurement and Interpretation of Discontinuity Spacing


Key Terminology for Spacing (Clause 5.1)

DescriptionSpacing (S)
Very close spacing< 60 mm
Close spacing60 - 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 - 600 mm
Wide spacing600 - 2000 mm
Very wide spacing> 2000 mm

Modal Spacing Formula (Clause 4.4)

[ S_{\text{model}} = d_m ]

  • (d_m) = most common (modal) distance measured.
  • Modal spacing is best presented via histograms for clarity.

Presentation of Results (Clause 5.2)

  • Use histograms for each discontinuity set.
  • Plot frequency curves on the same diagram for comparison.
  • Mean spacing can substitute modal spacing to handle multiple/poorly-defined modes.

Additional Notes

  • Use measuring tape and compass for accuracy (Note 1).
  • Average modal spacing approximates typical rock block size (Note 2).
  • Exclude blast damage fractures (Note 4).
  • For limited exposure, use seismic refraction or borehole techniques to estimate spacing (Notes 5 & 6).

Visualization Concept (Histogram)

graph LR
A[Discontinuity Set] --> B[Spacing Measurements]
B --> C[Histogram]
C --> D[Modal Spacing (dm)]
C --> E[Min Spacing (Smin)]
C --> F[Max Spacing (Smax)]

This approach ensures consistent measurement, interpretation, and presentation of discontinuity spacing in rock masses per IS 11315 Part 2.

Popular Questions About IS 11315 Part 2

?How is discontinuity spacing measured according to IS 11315 Part 2?

According to IS 11315 Part 2 (1987), Clause 3.5, discontinuity spacing is measured as follows:

  • Spacing is the perpendicular distance between adjacent discontinuities.
  • Use a measuring tape (minimum length 3 m) calibrated in millimeters for accuracy.
  • To ensure the measurement is perpendicular, use a compass and clinometer to find the angle between the tape and the discontinuity set.
  • The actual spacing ( S ) is calculated as:

[ S = L \times \cos \theta ]

where:

  • ( L ) = length measured along the tape between discontinuities,
  • ( \theta ) = angle between the tape and the discontinuity set (measured by clinometer).

Summary:

ParameterInstrumentUnit
Distance between discontinuitiesMeasuring tape (≥3 m)mm
Angle between tape and discontinuityCompass & clinometerdegrees
Loading diagram...

This method ensures accurate perpendicular spacing measurement in rock mass discontinuity analysis.

?What are the classification ranges for discontinuity spacing in this standard?

According to IS 11315 Part 2, the classification ranges for discontinuity spacing (Clause 5.1) are:

DescriptionSpacing (S)
Very close spacing< 60 mm
Close spacing60 - 200 mm
Moderate spacing200 - 600 mm
Wide spacing600 - 2000 mm
Very wide spacing> 2000 mm

Additional notes:

  • Spacing is the perpendicular distance between adjacent discontinuities (Clause 3.5).
  • Measurements should be done using a tape (≥ 3 m length) in mm.
  • Angles between tape and discontinuity sets are measured with compass and clinometer.

This classification helps in rock mass characterization and supports design decisions in geotechnical and rock engineering projects.

?How does spacing affect the mechanical behavior of rock masses?

Effect of Spacing on Mechanical Behavior of Rock Masses (IS 11315 Part 2)

  • Spacing controls block size: Closer spacing of discontinuities creates smaller rock blocks, reducing mass cohesion. Widely spaced discontinuities promote interlocking and higher cohesion (Clause 3.1).

  • Failure mode changes with spacing: Exceptionally close spacing can shift failure from translational sliding to circular or flow-type failures, such as rotation or rolling of small fragments (Clause 3.2).

  • Orientation less critical at close spacing: When spacing is very close, the orientation of discontinuities has minimal effect on failure mode (Clause 3.2).

  • Influence increases with other factors: The impact of spacing is amplified when shear strength is low and multiple joint sets exist, facilitating slip and deformation (Clause 3.3).


Summary Table

Spacing of DiscontinuitiesMechanical EffectFailure Mode
WideLarger blocks, interlocking, high cohesionTranslational sliding
CloseSmaller blocks, low cohesionCircular or flow-type
Exceptionally CloseVery small blocks, rotation/rollingFlow/shear zone failure

Loading diagram...

Key takeaway: Accurate measurement of spacing is crucial for predicting rock mass behavior and failure mode.

?Can spacing be estimated from drill core or seismic methods as per the standard?

According to IS 11315 Part 2 (1987), spacing of discontinuities can indeed be estimated from drill core and seismic methods:

  • Clause 4.4, Note 5: When rock exposures are limited or absent, seismic refraction techniques can estimate spacing in the upper 20-30 m. There is a reliable correlation between discontinuity frequency (number per meter) and P-wave velocity (Vp).

  • Clause 4.4, Note 6: Spacing or frequency can also be determined from drill core analysis and borehole viewing tools (TV cameras, photographic cameras, periscopes).

  • Clause 3.5: Direct measurement using tape, compass, and clinometer is preferred where possible.

Summary:

MethodApplicable DepthNotes
Visual measurementSurface exposuresMost accurate if accessible
Drill core analysisBoreholesEffective for inaccessible sites
Seismic refractionUpper 20-30 mCorrelates P-wave velocity with spacing

This allows estimation of spacing where direct surface measurement is impractical.

Loading diagram...
?How should directional bias be corrected during spacing measurements?

According to IS 11315 Part 2, directional bias correction during spacing measurements is needed when the measuring tape is not held perpendicular to the discontinuity set (Clause 4.1).

How to correct directional bias:

  • Measure the angle ( \theta ) between the tape and the discontinuity set using a compass and clinometer (Clause 3.5).
  • If the measured spacing along the tape is ( d_m ), the true spacing ( S ) perpendicular to the discontinuities is:

[ S = d_m \times \cos \theta ]

  • This correction accounts for the tape not being exactly perpendicular, ensuring the spacing reflects the actual perpendicular distance.

Summary:

  • Use a tape (≥ 3 m) calibrated in mm.
  • Measure angle ( \theta ) between tape and discontinuities.
  • Apply ( S = d_m \cos \theta ) to correct for directional bias.

This ensures accurate spacing data for statistical analysis and block size estimation.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 2. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required