IS 11315 Part 11 (1985) specifies the method for quantitatively describing discontinuities in rock masses through core recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD). It provides standardized procedures to measure and classify the quality of rock cores obtained from drilling, essential for assessing rock mass integrity in civil engineering, mining, and geotechnical projects. This standard is vital for engineers and geologists involved in site investigations, tunneling, foundation design, and rock mechanics evaluations.
Overview
IS 11315 Part 11 (1985) specifies the method for quantitatively describing discontinuities in rock masses through core recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD). It provides standardized procedures to measure and classify the quality of rock cores obtained from drilling, essential for assessing rock mass integrity in civil engineering, mining, and geotechnical projects. This standard is vital for engineers and geologists involved in site investigations, tunneling, foundation design, and rock mechanics evaluations.
Audience
Contents
Structure
IS 11315 Part 11 relates to Structural Steel Sections – Hot Rolled.
| Parameter | Formula/Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Section Modulus (Z) | ( Z = \frac{I}{y} ) | (I) = Moment of inertia, (y) = distance to extreme fiber |
| Moment of Inertia (I) | ( I = \int y^2 dA ) | For bending calculations |
| Radius of Gyration (r) | ( r = \sqrt{\frac{I}{A}} ) | (A) = Cross-sectional area |
IS 11315 Part 11 standardizes hot rolled steel section properties essential for structural design, ensuring uniformity in dimensions and mechanical properties.
flowchart LR
A[Hot Rolled Steel Sections] --> B[Dimensions & Tolerances]
A --> C[Sectional Properties]
C --> D[Moment of Inertia (I)]
C --> E[Section Modulus (Z)]
C --> F[Radius of Gyration (r)]
For detailed tables and exact dimensions, refer to the full IS 11315 Part 11 document.
IS 11315 Part 11 - Scope Summary
Purpose:
This part of IS 11315 guides field data collection for applying geomechanics classification in civil engineering projects.
Definitions:
Terms are as per IS 11358-1986.
Reporting:
Final test or analysis values must be rounded according to IS 2-1960.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Application | Field data collection for geomechanics |
| Reference for Terms | IS 11358-1986 |
| Rounding Off Values | IS 2-1960 standard |
flowchart LR
A[Field Data Collection] --> B[Geomechanics Classification]
B --> C[Civil Engineering Applications]
A --> D[Use IS 11358 Terms]
C --> E[Reporting as per IS 2-1960]
This diagram illustrates the scope flow from data collection to application and reporting standards.
IS 11315 Part 11 refers to definitions as per IS 11358-1986. Since IS 11315 defers to IS 11358 for definitions, here are key points:
flowchart TD
A[IS 11315 Part 11] --> B[Definitions as per IS 11358-1986]
B --> C[Structural Steel]
B --> D[Yield Strength (fy)]
B --> E[Ultimate Strength (fu)]
B --> F[Modulus of Elasticity (E)]
B --> G[Section Properties]
For detailed definitions and values, consult IS 11358-1986 directly.
IS 11315 Part 11: Symbols and Terminology
RQD (Rock Quality Designation):
Percentage of core pieces > 10 cm length in a drill run, indicating rock mass quality.
[
RQD = \left(\frac{\sum \text{length of core pieces} > 10 \text{ cm}}{\text{total length of core run}}\right) \times 100%
]
Vp (P-wave velocity):
Velocity of primary seismic waves measured by seismic refraction surveys, indicating rock stiffness.
Vi (Ultrasonic wave velocity):
Velocity of waves in rock cores from ultrasonic tests, used to assess rock integrity.
Fv (Volumetric Joint Count):
Number of joints per cubic meter, representing joint density in rock mass.
Note: Definitions follow IS 11358-1986.
| Symbol | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| RQD | Rock Quality Designation | % (percentage) |
| Vp | P-wave velocity (seismic refraction) | m/s |
| Vi | Ultrasonic wave velocity (cores) | m/s |
| Fv | Volumetric joint count | joints/m³ |
flowchart LR
A[RQD] -->|Core pieces >10cm| B[Rock Quality]
C[Vp] -->|Seismic waves| D[Rock Stiffness]
E[Vi] -->|Ultrasonic test| F[Rock Integrity]
G[Fv] -->|Joint count| H[Rock Mass Discontinuity]
This concise terminology is essential for interpreting rock mass properties in IS 11315 Part 11.
Core Recovery (IS 11315 Part 11)
Core Recovery (CR):
[
\text{CR} (%) = \frac{\text{Sum of lengths of all recovered core pieces}}{\text{Length drilled}} \times 100
]
Rock Quality Designation (RQD):
[
\text{RQD} (%) = \frac{\text{Sum of lengths of sound core pieces ≥ 10 cm}}{\text{Length drilled}} \times 100
]
flowchart LR
A[Length Drilled] --> B[Recovered Core Pieces]
B --> C[Sum Lengths of All Pieces]
B --> D[Sum Lengths of Pieces ≥ 10 cm (Sound Core)]
C --> E[Calculate Core Recovery %]
D --> F[Calculate RQD %]
This concise approach helps assess rock mass quality for design and construction.
Rock Quality Designation (RQD) - IS 11315 Part 11
[ RQD \approx \left(\frac{V}{V_r}\right)^2 \times 100 ]
| RQD (%) | Core Quality |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent |
| 75-90 | Good |
| 50-75 | Fair |
| 25-50 | Poor |
| < 25 | Very Poor |
flowchart LR
A[Total Core Length Drilled] --> B{Measure Core Pieces}
B -->|≥10 cm| C[Sum Lengths of Sound Core]
B -->|<10 cm| D[Exclude]
C --> E[Calculate RQD = (C/A)*100]
E --> F[Classify Core Quality]
This diagram shows the RQD calculation process.
General Principles of RQD (IS 11315 Part 11 - 1985)
Definition (Clause 5.1):
RQD = (Sum of lengths of sound core pieces ≥ 10 cm) / (Total length drilled) × 100%
Smaller pieces (<10 cm) due to joints, faults, or weathering are excluded.
Velocity Ratio Relation (Clause 5.3.1):
[
\text{RQD} \approx (\text{Velocity Ratio})^2 \times 100
]
where,
[
\text{Velocity Ratio} = \frac{V}{V_r}
]
Core Quality Classification (Clause 5.3.3, Table 5.2):
| RQD (%) | Core Quality |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent |
| 75-90 | Good |
| 50-75 | Fair |
| 25-50 | Poor |
| < 25 | Very Poor |
flowchart TD
A[Drilling Core] --> B{Measure Core Pieces}
B -->|≥10 cm| C[Sum Length of Sound Core]
B -->|<10 cm| D[Discarded]
C --> E[Calculate RQD %]
E --> F[Classify Core Quality]
Summary: RQD is a practical index indicating rock mass quality, closely related to seismic velocities, and classified into five quality levels for engineering assessment.
Precautions in Core Handling (IS 11315 Part 11)
Broken Core Pieces:
Core Barrel & Supervision:
Core Length Measurement:
Core Grinding & Loss:
Core Loss Zones:
Solution Cavities in Limestone:
| RQD (%) | Core Quality |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent |
| 75-90 | Good |
| 50-75 | Fair |
| 25-50 | Poor |
| <25 | Very Poor |
flowchart TD
A[Drilling Core] --> B{Core Broken?}
B -- Yes --> C[Fit pieces >10cm together]
B -- No --> D[Measure core length along center line]
C --> D
D --> E{Core Quality?}
E -->|Weak Material| F[Exclude from RQD]
E -->|Good Material| G[Calculate RQD]
G --> H[Record Core Loss Zones]
F --> H
H --> I[Report Results]
Use these guidelines to ensure accurate core recovery and reliable RQD evaluation as per IS 11315 Part 11.
IS 11315 (Part 11) - Indirect Methods for Estimating RQD
| Parameter | Formula / Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| RQD from velocity ratio | (RQD \approx \left(\frac{V}{V_r}\right)^2 \times 100) | Seismic & ultrasonic velocities |
| RQD from joint frequency | (RQD = 115 - 3.3 J_v) (if (J_v \geq 4.5)) | (RQD=100) if (J_v < 4.5) |
| Modified Core Recovery | Example: 57% (85/150) | Compared to Core Recovery 83% |
flowchart LR
A[Seismic Refraction Survey] -->|Measure V| B[Calculate Velocity Ratio \(V/V_r\)]
C[Ultrasonic Test on Core] -->|Measure \(V_r\)| B
B --> D[Estimate RQD using \( (V
IS 11315 Part 11: Reporting of Results - Key Points
| RQD (%) | Core Quality |
|---|---|
| 90 - 100 | Excellent |
| 75 - 90 | Good |
| 50 - 75 | Fair |
| 25 - 50 | Poor |
| < 25 | Very Poor |
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| RQD | Rock Quality Designation |
| V | P-wave velocity (seismic refraction) |
| VI | Ultrasonic wave velocity in rock cores |
| Fv | Volumetric joint count (joints/m³) |
flowchart TD
A[Start Geological Investigation] --> B[Core Recovery Measurement]
B --> C[Calculate RQD & Other Parameters]
C --> D[Classify Core Quality (Table 5.2)]
D --> E[Prepare Report]
E --> F[Include Geological Description]
E --> G[Include Core Recovery & Quality]
E --> H[Round off results as per IS 2-1960]
F & G & H --> I[Final Report Submission]
This ensures standardized, clear, and consistent reporting of rock core test results per IS 11315 Part 11.
Frequently Asked
According to IS 11315 Part 11, Clause 4.1, Core Recovery (CR) is calculated as:
[ \text{Core Recovery} (%) = \frac{\text{Summed length of all recovered core pieces}}{\text{Length drilled}} \times 100 ]
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Length drilled | Total length drilled in a run (cm or m) |
| Length recovered | Sum of lengths of all core pieces (assembled if fragmented) |
| Core Recovery (%) | (Length recovered / Length drilled) × 100 |
Loading diagram...
This method provides a quantitative measure of rock mass recovery during drilling.
Rock Quality Designation (RQD) Categories as per IS 11315 Part 11:
Definition: RQD is the percentage of core pieces longer than 10 cm in a drill run, representing rock quality.
Calculation:
[
RQD = \frac{\text{Sum of lengths of core pieces > 10 cm}}{\text{Total length drilled}} \times 100%
]
RQD Categories (Clause 5.3.3, Table 5.2):
| RQD (%) | Core Quality |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent |
| 75-90 | Good |
| 50-75 | Fair |
| 25-50 | Poor |
| < 25 | Very Poor |
Loading diagram...
Use RQD for quick rock mass quality assessment in foundations, slopes, and tunneling.
Precautions during Core Drilling & Handling (IS 11315 Part 11)
Loading diagram...
Summary: Use proper equipment, careful handling, and accurate measurement to ensure reliable RQD and core recovery data.
Correlation between RQD and Number of Joints (Jv):
From IS 11315 Part 11, Clause 3.3:
[ \boxed{ \text{RQD} = 115 - 3.3 \times J_v } ]
Notes:
Loading diagram...
This simple linear relationship helps in preliminary rock mass quality assessment from joint data.
Yes, indirect methods can be used to estimate RQD when drilling is not feasible, as per IS 11315 Part 11, Clause 5.3.
Dynamic Testing Method (Clause 5.3.1):
RQD is estimated using the velocity ratio from seismic and ultrasonic tests:
[
\text{RQD} \approx (\text{Velocity Ratio})^2 \times 100
]
where,
[
\text{Velocity Ratio} = \frac{V}{V_r}
]
Degree of Jointing Method (Clause 5.3.2):
RQD is correlated with the observed degree of jointing in the rock mass.
Loading diagram...
This approach ensures reliable RQD estimation without core drilling.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 11315 Part 11. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required