IS 100421981AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Code of practice for site investigations for the foundation in gravel-boulder deposit

IS 10042:1981 provides a comprehensive code of practice for conducting site investigations specifically for foundations in gravel-boulder deposits. It guides engineers on appropriate field and laboratory testing methods, including dynamic cone penetration tests and in situ shear tests, to assess soil properties and bearing capacity in challenging boulder-rich soils. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers and foundation designers working on structures such as buildings, bridges, and water tanks situated on gravel-boulder strata.

12Sections
113Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1981Edition
Soil and Foundation EngineeringCategory
Alternative search terms: IS 10042 PDF, IS 10042 pdf free download, IS 10042 free download pdf, IS10042 PDF, IS-10042 PDF, IS 10042 1981 PDF, IS 10042:1981 PDF, IS 10042-1981 PDF, IS 10042 (1981) PDF, IS 10042 1981 edition PDF, IS 10042 edition 1981 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IS 10042:1981 provides a comprehensive code of practice for conducting site investigations specifically for foundations in gravel-boulder deposits. It guides engineers on appropriate field and laboratory testing methods, including dynamic cone penetration tests and in situ shear tests, to assess soil properties and bearing capacity in challenging boulder-rich soils. This standard is essential for geotechnical engineers and foundation designers working on structures such as buildings, bridges, and water tanks situated on gravel-boulder strata.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Foundation Designers
  • Civil Engineers
  • Soil Mechanics Specialists
  • Construction Project Managers
  • Bridge and Infrastructure Engineers
  • Laboratory Testing Technicians

Key Topics Covered

Site investigation methods for gravel-boulder deposits
Field exploration techniques including open trial pits
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) procedures
In situ shear testing methods (Boulder-Boulder Test and Concrete-Boulder Test)
Sampling challenges and disturbed sample analysis
Grain size distribution and classification of boulder soils
Load testing of cast in-situ footings on boulder deposits
Determination of allowable soil pressure and settlement criteria
Influence of filler material on soil behavior
Interpretation of load-settlement curves
Design considerations for foundations on boulder-gravel strata
Safety and excavation practices for large trial pits

Table of Contents

1Scope

IS 10042: Scope - Key Formulas, Tables & Specifications

Scope:
IS 10042 provides guidelines for subsurface investigations for foundations, including soil sampling, grain size analysis, and allowable soil parameters.


Key Symbols (Clause 3.1)

SymbolMeaningUnit
BWidth of strip foundation / diameter of circular foundationm
qaAllowable soil pressure for 12 or 25 mm settlementtonnes/m²
ToResidual soil strengthtonnes/m²
SaAllowable settlement for structurecm
N"Cumulative number of blows at depth De-
DcDepth of penetrationcm
BcDiameter of conecm
YcNatural unit weight of soiltonnes/m³

Important Formula (Clause 2.54)

[ L = N" \times Sa \times D \times B ]

  • (Sa) = allowable deformation (cm), depends on structure type
  • (B) = footing width (m)
  • (N"), (D) values from Fig. 6 (not provided here)

Laboratory Test (Clause 7.2.1)

  • From grain size analysis, determine proportion of boulder/gravel in sample.
  • Used to decide if boulder/gravel is matrix or inclusion.

Units (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
Masskilogramkg
Timeseconds
ForcenewtonN (1 N = 1 kg·m/s²)
PressurepascalPa (1 Pa = 1 N/m²)

flowchart LR
    A[Soil Sampling] --> B[Grain Size Analysis]
    B --> C{Proportion of Boulder/Gravel}
    C -->|Matrix| D[Classify Soil Matrix]
    C -->|Inclusion| E[Classify Boulder/Gravel]
    D & E --> F[Decide Foundation Design Parameters]

2Definitions and Symbols

IS 10042: Definitions and Symbols - Key Points

1. Symbols (Clause 3.1)

  • B = Width of strip foundation / side of square foundation / diameter of circular foundation (m)
  • qa = Allowable soil pressure for 12 mm or 25 mm settlement (tonnes/m²)
  • To = Residual soil strength (tonnes/m²)
  • Sa = Allowable settlement for structure (cm)
  • N" = Cumulative number of blows at penetration depth De (m)
  • Dc = Depth of penetration (cm)
  • Bc = Diameter of cone (cm)
  • Yc = Natural unit weight of soil (tonnes/m³)

2. Key Formula (Clause 2.54)

[ L = N'' \times S_a \times D \times B ] Where:

  • (S_a) = allowable deformation (cm),
  • (B) = footing width (m),
  • (N''), (D) from Fig. 6 (not provided here).

3. SI Units (International System)

QuantityUnitSymbolDefinition
LengthmetremBase unit
ForcenewtonN(1,N = 1,kg \cdot m/s^2)
Pressure/StresspascalPa(1,Pa = 1,N/m^2)
EnergyjouleJ(1,J = 1,N \cdot m)

4. Notes

  • Use qa for allowable soil pressure limits based on settlement.
  • Refer to Fig. 6 for values of (N'') and (D) when calculating footing parameters.
  • Settlement limits and soil strength are critical for foundation design.

graph LR
A[Foundation Width (B)] --> C[Allowable Settlement (Sa)]
C --> D[Number of Blows (N'')]
D --> E[Depth of Penetration (D)]
E --> F[Calculate Load (L = N'' × Sa × D × B)]

This concise overview aids in interpreting symbols and formulas essential for foundation design per IS 10042.

3Nature of Gravel-Boulder Deposits

Nature of Gravel-Boulder Deposits (IS 10042)

1. Nature of Deposit (Clause 4.2)

  • Boulder deposits are either fluvial or glacial origin.
  • Contain boulders/gravel with filler material: sand, silt, or clay.
  • Two configurations:
    • Filler in interstices of boulders (Fig. 1A)
    • Boulders in matrix of filler (Fig. 1B)

2. Behaviour Under Load (Clause 4.3)

  • Load behavior depends on:
    • Size, quantity, and packing of boulders.
    • Nature and amount of filler.
  • When filler absent: high load capacity, low compressibility.
  • With filler: initial compression followed by low compressibility.
  • If boulders > 30%, initial rapid compression then load carried mainly by boulders.
  • If boulders < 30%, use normal soil load test methods (IS 1888-1982).

3. Influence of Filler (Clause 4.4)

  • If boulders in filler matrix, matrix properties dominate.
  • If filler in boulder interstices, boulders dominate behavior.

Key Specifications & Guidelines

ParameterDescription
Boulder Proportion> 30%: Peculiar compression behavior; < 30%: Normal soil methods apply
Load Test ReferenceIS 1888-1982 (Method of Load Tests on Soils)
Filler MaterialSand, silt, clay; affects compressibility and load capacity
Behaviour ModelInitial compression stage → Load carried by boulders or matrix

Summary Diagram: Gravel-Boulder Soil Stratum

graph LR
    A[Filler in Interstices of Boulders] --> Behaviour1[Load carried mainly by boulders]
    B[Boulders in Matrix of Filler] --> Behaviour2[Load governed by filler matrix]
    A & B --> LoadBehavior[Load Behavior Depends on Composition]

Practical Note:

  • Determine boulder/gravel proportion by grain size analysis (Clause 7.2.1).
  • Use conservative design load to reduce deformation.

For detailed design, refer to IS 10042 clauses 4.2

4Behavior and Properties of Boulder-Gravel Soils

Behavior & Properties of Boulder-Gravel Soils (IS 10042)

Key Points from Clause 4.3 & 4.4:

  • Boulder-Gravel Proportion > 30%:

    • Initial rapid compression followed by low compression as boulders carry the load.
    • Load capacity is high, compressibility low when filler absent.
    • Advantageous to design allowable load beyond initial compression load to reduce deformation.
  • Boulder-Gravel Proportion < 30%:

    • Use normal soil load interpretation methods (IS 1888-1982).
    • Behavior governed mainly by filler material if boulders exist in matrix (Fig. 1B).
  • Filler Material Influence:

    • If filler exists in interstices (Fig. 1A), behavior governed by boulders.
    • If boulders in filler matrix, filler properties dominate but compressibility reduces.

Laboratory & Investigation (Clause 7.2, 7.2.1)

  • Grain Size Analysis separates:
    • Boulder/Cobbles/Gravel: > 4.75 mm
    • Matrix (filler): < 4.75 mm
  • Proportion of boulder/gravel used to decide soil behavior type.

Simplified Behavior Summary Table:

Boulder-Gravel %Filler LocationBehavior CharacteristicsDesign Approach
> 30%Interstices of bouldersHigh load capacity, low compressibility after initial compressionAllowable load > initial compression load
< 30%Matrix of fillerBehavior like normal soils, filler governs behaviorUse IS 1888-1982 soil load methods

Conceptual Diagram (Mermaid.js)

graph LR
A[Boulder-Gravel Soil] --> B{Boulder-Gravel %}
B -->|>30%| C[High Load Capacity, Low Compressibility]
B -->|<30%| D[Normal Soil Behavior]
C --> E{Filler Location}
E -->|Interstices| F[Boulder governs behavior]
E -->|Matrix| G[Filler governs behavior]
D --> H[Use IS 1888-1982 Methods]

Units & Symbols (SI Units):

  • Length = **
5Methods of Investigation

IS 10042: Methods of Investigation - Key Points

1. In Situ Density Measurement (Clause 5.3)

  • Use Water Replacement or Sand Replacement method.
  • Excavate a pit of 1 m × 1 m × 0.5 m.
  • Weigh excavated soil using a spring balance (100 kg capacity).
  • Cover pit with polyethylene sheet.
  • Fill pit with water; volume of water = volume of soil.
  • Calculate density:
    [ \text{Density} = \frac{\text{Mass of soil}}{\text{Volume of pit (water replaced)}} ]
  • Reference: IS 2720 (Part XXXIII) - 1971.

2. Grain Size Analysis & Boulder/Gravel Proportion (Clause 7.2.1)

  • From sample grain size analysis, determine the proportion of boulder/gravel.
  • Helps decide if boulder/gravel is matrix or vice versa.

3. Units and Symbols

  • Length: m, Mass: kg, Time: s
  • Force: N = kg·m/s², Pressure: Pa = N/m²
  • Energy: J = N·m, Power: W = J/s

4. Additional Notes

  • Interstitial material (<5 cm) affects load capacity (see Table and Fig. 4 in IS).
  • Soil samples from pit can be used for classification and grain size tests.

flowchart TD
    A[Excavate Pit (1m x 1m x 0.5m)] --> B[Weigh Excavated Soil]
    B --> C[Cover Pit with Polyethylene Sheet]
    C --> D[Fill Pit with Water]
    D --> E[Calculate Volume of Water = Volume of Soil]
    E --> F[Density = Mass of Soil / Volume of Water]

This concise summary covers the key investigation methods and specifications from IS 10042.

6Allowable Soil Pressure

Allowable Soil Pressure (qa) — IS 10042 Key Points


Definitions (Clause 3.1)

  • B = Width of strip foundation / side of square foundation / diameter of circular foundation (m)
  • qa = Allowable soil pressure for 12 mm or 25 mm settlement (tonnes/m²)
  • To = Residual soil strength (tonnes/m²)
  • Sa = Allowable settlement (cm)

Formula from In-Situ Shear Tests (Clause 6.3)

[ \boxed{ q_a = X \times T_o \times B_r } ]

  • X = Constant
    • 6 to 25 for 12 mm settlement
    • 8 for 25 mm settlement
  • Br = Width of footing (m)
  • To = Residual shear strength from BBT or CBT (tonnes/m²)

Testing & Application Notes

  • Load tests (Clause 6.1) validate results from BBT, CBT, and DCPT.
  • Normal load on samples in BBT/CBT should equal overburden or expected load but not exceed twice the soil shear strength (Clause 5.10).
  • Follow IS 7746-1975+ and IS 2720 (Part 39/Sec 2)-1979 for high normal load shear strength tests.

Summary Table: Constants for X

Settlement (mm)X (Constant)
126 to 25
258

This approach ensures safe bearing capacity considering soil strength and allowable settlement limits.

7Laboratory Testing Procedures

IS 10042 - Laboratory Testing Procedures (Clause 7.2.1 & related)

  • Grain Size Analysis:
    From the known sample quantity, determine the proportion of boulder/gravel. This helps decide if boulder/gravel is matrix or vice versa.

  • Key Test Setups:

    • Boulder-Boulder Test (BBT)
    • Concrete Boulder Test (CBT)
    • Use hydraulic jack (20 T capacity), proving rings, steel plates, and supports as per Figs. 8 & 9 for sample shear tests.
  • Allowable Pressure (qa) Calculation (Clause 6.3):
    [ q_a = X \times T_o \times B_r ] where:

    • (X = 6 \text{ (for 12 mm deformation)}) or (8 \text{ (for 25 mm deformation)})
    • (T_o =) residual shear stress from BBT/CBT tests (kg/cm²)
    • (B_r =) width of footing (m)
  • Units:

    • Shear stress in kg/cm²
    • Displacement in mm
    • Force in Newton (N), Pressure in Pascal (Pa)

Summary Table: Allowable Pressure Calculation

ParameterSymbolTypical ValueUnit
Constant (deformation)X6 (12 mm) / 8 (25 mm)-
Residual shear stress(T_o)From BBT/CBT testskg/cm²
Footing width(B_r)Assumed per structurem
Allowable pressure(q_a)Calculatedkg/cm² or Pa

flowchart LR
    A[Sample Collection] --> B[Grain Size Analysis]
    B --> C[Determine Boulder/Gravel Proportion]
    C --> D[Laboratory Shear Tests (BBT/CBT)]
    D --> E[Measure Residual Shear Stress \(T_o\)]
    E --> F[Calculate \(q_a = X \times T_o \times B_r\)]
    F --> G[Design Foundation Parameters
8Field Testing Equipment and Setup

IS 10042: Field Testing Equipment & Setup – Key Points

1. Equipment for Boulder/Gravel Testing (Clause 7.2.1 & Figures 8 & 9)

  • Hydraulic Jack: 20 T capacity for applying load.
  • Proving Ring: 20 T capacity to measure load.
  • Steel Shear Box & Steel Plates: To hold samples.
  • Wooden Sleepers & Supports: For stable setup.
  • Flexible Pipes & Pump: For jack operation.
  • Weights (Steel/Concrete/Sandbags): To apply static load.
  • Dial Gauge & Magnetic Holder: For displacement measurement.

2. Setup Details

  • Samples placed inside rigid formers.
  • Use of angle iron stiffeners for frame rigidity.
  • Setup dimensions in cm (refer IS fig. 8 & 9 for exact layout).

3. Key Symbols & Units (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbol
ForcenewtonN
Pressure/Stresspascal (N/m²)Pa
Lengthmetrem

4. Important Formula (Clause 3.1)

  • Allowable soil pressure (qa) related to settlement:

    [ q_a = \text{Allowable soil pressure corresponding to 12 mm or 25 mm settlement (tonnes/m}^2) ]

  • Dynamic Cone Penetration test relation (Clause 6.2):

    [ q_a = f(N", D, B_c) ]

    where (N") = cumulative blows, (D) = depth, (B_c) = cone diameter.

5. Testing Notes

  • Collect known quantity samples for grain size analysis.
  • Determine proportion of boulder/gravel in matrix.
  • Avoid equipment damage by limiting blows (e.g., stop if blows > 100 for last 30 cm penetration).

Visual Summary: Test Setup Components

graph LR
A[Hydraulic Jack 20T] --> B[Proving Ring 20T]
B --> C[Steel Shear Box]
C --> D[Boulder/Gravel Sample]
D --> E[Steel Plates & Supports]
E --> F[Dial Gauge & Magnetic Holder]
A --> G[Pump & Flexible Pipe]
E --> H[Weights (Steel/
9Load Testing of Foundations

IS 10042: Load Testing of Foundations - Key Points & Formulas

1. Load Test Setup

  • Use cast in-situ concrete footing or precast blocks with fresh mortar for perfect soil-block bond.
  • Minimum footing size:
    [ \text{Footing size} \geq \max(10 \times \text{average grain size}, 150 \text{ cm}) ]
  • Load applied via hydraulic jack (100 tonnes capacity) and dead load platform.

2. Load Application & Measurement

  • Deformation measured with 4 dial gauges (0.001 mm accuracy) as per IS 1888-1982.
  • Load increments held for minimum 1 hour or until deformation rate ≤ 0.02 mm/min.
  • Record deformation at 1, 4, 10, 20, 40, 60 min, then hourly.
  • Minimum 8 load increments until 50 mm settlement or failure.

3. Allowable Soil Pressure (Clause 3.1)

  • ( q_a ) = allowable soil pressure (tonnes/m²) corresponding to 12 mm or 25 mm settlement.
  • ( S_a ) = allowable settlement (cm).
  • Use load-settlement curve to determine ( q_a ).

4. Residual Shear Strength (CBT & BBT Tests)

  • Residual shear stress ( T_0 ) (tonnes/m²) from Concrete-Boulder Test (CBT) or Boulder Block Test (BBT) are equal.
  • Plot shear stress vs displacement to obtain soil strength parameters.

Summary Table: Load Test Parameters

ParameterValue/Method
Minimum footing size(\geq \max(10 \times \text{grain size}, 150 \text{ cm}))
Load incrementsMinimum 8 increments
Settlement limitUp to 50 mm or failure
Deformation measurement4 dial gauges, average reading
Load holding time≥ 1 hour or until deformation rate ≤ 0.02 mm/min
Allowable soil pressure (q_a)Corresponding to 12 or 25 mm settlement

Load-Settlement Curve Illustration

graph LR
A
10Interpretation of Test Results

Interpretation of Test Results (IS 10042 - Clause 7.2.1)

  • Proportion Calculation:
    From the known quantity of collected samples and grain size analysis, calculate the overall proportion of boulder/gravel.
    This helps determine if boulder/gravel is part of the matrix or vice versa.

  • Key Symbols (Clause 3.1):

    SymbolMeaningUnit
    BWidth/side/diameter of foundationm
    qaAllowable soil pressure (at 12 or 25 mm settlement)tonnes/m²
    ToResidual soil strengthtonnes/m²
    SaAllowable settlementcm
    N"Cumulative blows at depth De-
    DcDepth of penetrationcm
    BcDiameter of conecm
    YcNatural unit weight of soiltonnes/m³
  • Allowable Soil Pressure (qa) Estimation:
    For max grain size ≤ 100 mm, use dynamic cone penetration test results per IS 4968 (Part I) to compute qa.

  • Rounding Off Results:
    Final test values should be rounded as per IS 2-1960, matching significant figures of specified values.


Summary Table for Boulder/Gravel Interpretation

ParameterDescriptionUnit
Sample QuantityWeight or volume of collected soil samplekg or m³
Grain Size AnalysisPercentage of boulder/gravel in sample%
Boulder/Gravel ProportionUsed to decide matrix dominance-

Visual Concept: Boulder/Gravel Proportion Decision Flow

flowchart TD
    A[Collect Soil Sample] --> B[Grain Size Analysis]
    B --> C{Calculate Boulder/Gravel Proportion}
    C -->|High Boulder Content| D[Classify as Boulder Matrix]
    C -->|Low Boulder Content| E[Classify as Gravel Matrix]

Note: For detailed test setups and shear stress comparisons, refer to Figures 8, 9, and 10 in IS 10042.

11Safety and Excavation Guidelines

IS 10042: Safety and Excavation Guidelines - Key Points

While IS 10042 primarily focuses on subsurface investigations, key safety and excavation guidelines can be summarized as:

1. Safety in Excavation

  • Slope Stability: Ensure excavation slopes are stable based on soil type and depth.
  • Shoring/Bracing: Use appropriate shoring to prevent collapse in deep excavations.
  • Access: Provide safe means of entry/exit (ladders, ramps).
  • Hazard Identification: Check for underground utilities and water ingress.
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Helmets, boots, gloves mandatory.

2. Excavation Specifications

  • Excavation Depth: Limited by soil type and groundwater conditions.
  • Boulder/Gravel Identification: From Clause 7.2.1, grain size analysis determines boulder/gravel proportions, critical for deciding excavation methods.
  • Allowable Soil Pressure (qa): Used for foundation design, linked to settlement criteria (12 mm or 25 mm settlement).

3. Relevant Formula (from Clause 3.1)

[ Sa = \text{allowable settlement (cm)}; \quad B = \text{foundation width (m)} ]

Use cumulative blow counts (N'') and depth (D) from standard charts (Fig. 6 in IS 10042) to assess soil bearing capacity and excavation safety.


Units & Symbols (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbol
Lengthmetrem
ForcenewtonN = kg·m/s²
Pressure/StresspascalPa = N/m²

Summary Diagram: Excavation Safety Workflow

graph TD
  A[Site Assessment] --> B[Soil Sampling & Grain Size Analysis]
  B --> C[Determine Boulder/Gravel Proportion]
  C --> D[Decide Excavation Method & Slope]
  D --> E[Implement Safety Measures]
  E --> F[Excavate with Monitoring]
  F --> G[Foundation Preparation]

Note: For detailed excavation slopes, shoring types, and safety distances, refer to IS 3764 (Safety Code for Excavation Work) and IS 1893 (for seismic considerations).

12References and Related Standards

IS 10042: References and Related Standards - Key Points

1. Related Standards

  • IS 2809-1972: Definitions for subsurface investigations for foundations.
  • IS 2-1960: Guidelines for rounding off numerical values.
  • Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, contributed to the formulation.

2. Units and Symbols (SI Units)

QuantityUnitSymbolDefinition/Relation
Lengthmetrem
Masskilogramkg
Timeseconds
ForcenewtonN1 N = 1 kg·m/s²
EnergyjouleJ1 J = 1 N·m
PowerwattW1 W = 1 J/s
Pressure, stresspascalPa1 Pa = 1 N/m²
FrequencyhertzHz1 Hz = 1 cycle/s

3. Grain Size Analysis (Clause 7.2.1)

  • Determine proportion of boulder/gravel from sample quantity and grain size.
  • Use this to decide if boulder/gravel is embedded in matrix or vice versa.

4. Rounding Off (Clause 0.4)

  • Follow IS 2-1960 for rounding test/analysis results.
  • Maintain the same number of significant digits as specified values.

flowchart TD
    A[Sample Collection] --> B[Grain Size Analysis]
    B --> C{Proportion of Boulder/Gravel}
    C -->|High| D[Boulder in Matrix]
    C -->|Low| E[Matrix in Boulder]

This summary helps ensure compliance with IS 10042 by referencing related standards, units, testing methods, and rounding rules.

Popular Questions About IS 10042

?What are the recommended field test methods for gravel-boulder deposits according to IS 10042?

IS 10042 recommends the following field test methods for gravel-boulder deposits:

  • Visual and manual inspection to classify and estimate boulder, cobble, and gravel content.
  • Standard penetration test (SPT) for in-situ soil strength and density assessment.
  • Dynamic cone penetration test (DCPT) may be used for preliminary profiling.
  • Grain size distribution of disturbed samples in the lab using IS sieves to separate:
    • Boulder/cobbles/gravel (>4.75 mm)
    • Matrix (<4.75 mm)

Since bouldery soils are coarse and heterogeneous, field tests focus on penetration resistance and visual classification rather than undisturbed sampling.

Summary Table:

Test TypePurposeApplicable Size Range
Visual/manualClassification and estimation>4.75 mm (boulders, gravel)
SPTSoil strength and densityGeneral soil profile
Grain size analysisParticle size distributionLab test on disturbed samples

This approach ensures reliable characterization of gravel-boulder deposits for foundation design.

?How does the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) help in assessing boulder-gravel soils?

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) in Boulder-Gravel Soils (IS 10042)

  • Purpose: DCPT is used to identify soil strata and assess strength in boulder-gravel soils where aggregate size ≤ 100-120 mm (Clause 5.4).
  • Test Setup: Similar to SPT but uses a cast iron cone with:
    • Apex angle = 60°
    • Base diameter = 62.5 mm
    • Clearance with drill rod = 11.36 mm (reduces friction)
  • Procedure: The cone is driven dynamically into the soil; penetration resistance reflects soil density and strength.
  • Outcome: Penetration resistance (number of blows per penetration depth) helps compute allowable bearing pressure (Clause 6.2).
  • Limitation: Maximum grain size should not exceed 100 mm for reliable results.

This test is especially valuable in boulder-gravel soils where conventional SPT samplers face difficulty due to large aggregates.

Loading diagram...

Summary: DCPT offers a practical, reliable method to evaluate soil strength in coarse-grained boulder-gravel soils with aggregates up to 100 mm, aiding foundation design.

?What challenges exist in sampling gravel-boulder soils and how does the standard address them?

Challenges in Sampling Gravel-Boulder Soils (IS 10042):

  • Large particle size (>300 mm boulders): Makes undisturbed sampling impossible by usual methods.
  • Heterogeneous mix: Large boulders mixed with fine to coarse gravels complicate representative sampling.
  • Disturbed samples unreliable: Recompaction cannot restore natural grain arrangement, affecting test results.

How IS 10042 addresses these challenges:

  • Sampling method: Only disturbed samples from technical pits at various depths (~1 m or strata change) are collected.
  • Sample size: Large quantity (~1000 kg) ensures representative soil proportions.
  • Separation by size: Particles >80 mm separated and graded in the field; particles <80 mm collected in labeled containers (gunny bags) for lab grain size analysis.
  • Testing focus: Grain size distribution is the primary lab test on disturbed samples using IS sieves (cut-off at 4.75 mm).

Summary Table:

AspectApproach per IS 10042
Sampling typeDisturbed samples only
Sample quantity≥ 1000 kg per depth
Particle size handling>80 mm separated & graded in field; <80 mm stored for lab
Tests on samplesGrain size distribution only
Loading diagram...

This approach ensures representative sampling despite the challenges posed by gravel-boulder soils.

?How is allowable soil pressure determined for foundations on boulder-gravel deposits?

Allowable Soil Pressure for Foundations on Boulder-Gravel Deposits (IS 10042: Clause 4.3)

  • The allowable soil pressure depends on the composition and arrangement of the boulder-gravel deposit:

    • Filler in interstices of boulders (Fig. 1A): Behavior depends on packing density, size, shape (rounded or angular), and quantity of boulders.
    • Boulders in matrix of filler material (Fig. 1B): Behavior governed by filler nature and boulder distribution.
  • When filler is absent, capacity is high with low compressibility.

  • When filler is present, initial compression occurs, followed by reduced compression as boulders carry load.

  • For boulder content > 30%, expect:

    • Initial rapid compression.
    • Followed by a stage with low compression as boulders take load.
    • Design allowable load should exceed the load causing initial compression to reduce deformation.
  • For boulder content < 30%, use normal soil load test methods as per IS 1888-1982.


Summary Table

Boulder ContentBehaviorAllowable Pressure Approach
> 30%Initial compression + stiffeningAllowable load > load at initial compression stage
< 30%Similar to normal soilUse IS 1888 load test methods

Loading diagram...

Note: Always conduct site-specific load tests to confirm allowable pressures due to variability in boulder-gravel deposits.

?What size and type of footing are recommended for load testing in boulder-rich soils?

Recommended Footing Size and Type for Load Testing in Boulder-Rich Soils (IS 10042 Clause 5.5):

  • Type: Cast in-situ concrete footing or precast concrete blocks set with fresh mortar to ensure perfect bond with soil.
  • Size:
    • Minimum size should span several boulders to mobilize group action.
    • Minimum dimension = 10 × average grain size of boulders, but not less than 150 cm.
    • Size can be increased based on feasibility.

Additional Recommendations:

  • Steel plates are discouraged due to seating difficulties.
  • Load applied via hydraulic jack (100 tonnes capacity) through dead load kentledges platform.
  • Deformation measured with 4 dial gauges (accuracy 0.001 mm) per IS 1888-1982.
  • Load increments held for at least 1 hour or until deformation rate reduces to 0.02 mm/min.
  • Testing continues until 50 mm deformation or failure, with at least 8 load increments.

Summary Table

ParameterRecommendation
Footing TypeCast in-situ or precast concrete
Minimum Size≥ 10 × average grain size, min 150 cm
Load ApplicationHydraulic jack (100 tonnes)
Deformation Measurement4 dial gauges (0.001 mm accuracy)
Load Increment Duration≥ 1 hour or until deformation rate ≤ 0.02 mm/min
Test Completion50 mm deformation or failure
Loading diagram...

This ensures reliable load test results reflecting group action over boulders in soil.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 10042. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required