IRC SP 19 (Second Revision, 2001) is a comprehensive manual providing detailed guidelines for the survey, investigation, and preparation of road projects in India. It covers all stages from preliminary surveys, soil and material investigations, traffic studies, environmental considerations, to preparation of detailed project reports. This standard is essential for engineers and planners involved in highway design, construction, and rehabilitation, ensuring projects are technically sound, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable.
Overview
IRC SP 19 (Second Revision, 2001) is a comprehensive manual providing detailed guidelines for the survey, investigation, and preparation of road projects in India. It covers all stages from preliminary surveys, soil and material investigations, traffic studies, environmental considerations, to preparation of detailed project reports. This standard is essential for engineers and planners involved in highway design, construction, and rehabilitation, ensuring projects are technically sound, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Scope Overview:
Road Inventory & Condition Survey (Clause 14):
Soil Investigations (Clause 13.3 & Table 1):
| Date | Location | Soil Type | % Passing 4-7mm | % Passing 2mm | % Passing 425μ | % Passing 75μ | Sand Content (%) | LL (%) | PL (%) | PI | Max Dry Density (g/cc) | OMC (%) | Remarks |
|---|
flowchart TD
A[Project Preparation] --> B[Road Inventory & Condition Survey]
B --> C[Data Collection: Riding Quality,
IRC SP 19: Stages in Project Preparation
Though the code snippet lacks detailed clauses, typical project preparation stages per IRC SP 19 and standard practice include:
| Stage | Key Activities | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Preliminary | Traffic & feasibility studies | Feasibility report |
| Detailed Investigation | Soil & topographical surveys | Survey reports |
| Preliminary Design | Alignment & cross-section design | Preliminary drawings & estimates |
| Detailed Design | Structural & detailed design | Final design & specifications |
| Cost Estimation | Quantity & cost analysis | Detailed cost estimate |
| Sanction & Tender | Approval & bidding process | Sanction orders & contract docs |
This structured approach ensures comprehensive project planning and sanctioning per IRC guidelines.
Preliminary Survey Key Points from IRC SP 19
Traverse Survey:
Offsets & Features:
Levelling:
Map Scales:
| Terrain Type | Horizontal Scale | Vertical Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Built-up/Hilly | 1:1,000 | 1:100 |
| Plain/Rolling | 1:2,500 | 1:250 |
flowchart TD
A[Reconnaissance Survey] --> B[Preliminary Traverse Survey]
B --> C[Feature Offsets & Levelling]
C --> D[Map Preparation & Contour Drawing]
D --> E[Final Alignment Selection]
This concise framework ensures accurate physical data collection for highway alignment decisions per IRC SP 19.
IRC SP 19: Guiding Principles of Route Selection and Alignment Improvement
[ \text{Total Cost} = C_c + C_m + C_u ]
Where:
flowchart TD
A[Start: Preliminary Survey] --> B[Consider Factors: Topography, Environment, Social]
B --> C[Estimate Costs: Construction, Maintenance, User]
C --> D[Evaluate Alternatives]
D --> E[Select Optimum Route]
E --> F[Detailed Investigation]
F --> G[Final Alignment & Approval]
Summary: Route selection balances cost, environment, and social factors, aiming for the lowest life-cycle transportation cost.
1. Traverse Survey:
2. Distance Measurement:
3. Transit Stations:
4. Feature Location:
5. Levelling:
6. Map Scales:
| Terrain Type | Horizontal Scale | Vertical Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Built-up / Hilly | 1:1,000 | 1:100 |
| Plain / Rolling | 1:2,500 | 1:250 |
7. Additional:
flowchart TD
A[Start Preliminary Survey] --> B[Run Traverse along Route]
B --> C[Measure Distances with EDM/Total Station]
C --> D[Mark Transit Stations]
D --> E[Record Offsets of Physical Features]
E --> F[Fly Leveling at 50m Intervals]
F --> G[Take Cross-sections (Spacing by Terrain)]
G --> H[Prepare Maps & Sections (with Contours)]
H --> I[Collect Additional Data (Traffic, Soil, Drainage)]
I --> J[Complete Preliminary Survey]
This concise summary aligns with IRC SP 19 clauses 8.2
IRC SP 19: Bench Marks and Staking Final Centre Line
| Terrain Type | Cross-section Interval | Levelling Interval (Fly levels) | Bench Mark Interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plain | 100 to 250 m | 50 m | 250 to 500 m |
| Rolling | Up to 50 m | 50 m | 250 to 500 m |
| Hilly | Up to 20 m | 50 m | 250 to 500 m |
| Terrain Type | Horizontal Scale | Vertical Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Built-up / Hilly | 1:1,000 | 1:100 |
| Plain / Rolling | 1:2,500 | 1:250 |
flowchart TD
A[Preliminary Survey] --> B[Traverse along Probable Centre Line]
B --> C[Mark Transit Stations (Stakes)]
C --> D[Measure Distances with EDM/Total Station]
D --> E[Record Offsets to Physical Features]
E --> F[Establish Bench Marks (250-500m)]
Soil and Material Surveys — IRC SP 19 Key Points
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Location & Date | Sampling site and date |
| Soil Type | Classification per IS system (see IRC:36 paras 3.10-3.13) |
| Sieve Analysis (% Passing) | 4-7 mm, 2 mm, 425 micron, 75 micron sieves |
| Sand Content (%) | Calculated as % passing 4-7 mm sieve minus % passing 75 micron sieve |
| Atterberg Limits (%) | Liquid Limit (LL), Plastic Limit (PL), Plasticity Index (PI) |
| Density Tests | Max Dry Density (g/cc) for normal & heavy compaction, Optimum Moisture Content (OMC %) |
| Deleterious Constituents | Presence of salt (especially in salt-infested areas) and other harmful materials |
| Remarks | Observations and suitability notes |
[ \text{Sand Content (%)} = % \text{Passing 4-7 mm sieve} - % \text{Passing 75 micron sieve} ]
flowchart TD
A[Soil Sampling] --> B[Laboratory Tests]
B --> C[Sieve Analysis]
B --> D[Atterberg Limits]
B --> E[Density & Moisture Content]
C --> F[Calculate Sand Content]
D --> G[Classify Soil (IRC:36)]
F --> H[Select Homogeneous Soil]
G --> H
H --> I[Prepare Borrow Area Chart]
I --> J[Design Embank
IRC SP 19: Road Inventory and Condition Survey – Key Points
Refer to Appendix-7 of IRC SP 19 for detailed formats.
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Date & Time | Observation timestamp |
| Climate Conditions | Hot/Humid/Cold |
| Air Temperature (°C) | At time of test |
| Annual Rainfall (mm) | Local climatic data |
| Pavement Temperature (°C) | At test location |
| Soil Type & Plasticity | LL, PL, PI (IS:2720 Part XVI) |
| Moisture Content (%) | At test point |
| Dial Gauge Reading | Initial, Intermediate, Final |
| Rebound Deflection (mm) | Calculated deflection |
| SI No. | Location | Pavement Temp (°C) | Soil Type | Moisture (%) | Dial Reading (Initial/Intermediate/Final) | Rebound Deflection (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
This structured approach ensures comprehensive road condition assessment aligned with IRC SP 19 guidelines.
IRC SP 19: Drainage Studies - Key Points & Specifications
flowchart TD
A[Preliminary Survey] --> B[Site Inspection & Local Enquiry]
B --> C[Data Collection: HFL, Water Table, Ponded Water]
C --> D[Special Investigations in Cut Sections]
D --> E[Design Drainage System]
E --> F[Finalize Road Grade & Pavement Design]
| Parameter | Measurement Method | Frequency/Interval | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Flood |
| Catchment Area | Distance for Cross-Sections (upstream & downstream) |
|---|---|
| 2.5 sq.km | 150 m |
| 2.5 to 10 sq.km | 300 m |
| Over 10 sq.km | 400 m to 1600 m |
flowchart TD
A[Estimate Design Discharge] --> B[Choose Structure Type]
B --> C[Determine Waterway & Vent Height]
C --> D[Structural Design]
D --> E[Construction & Inspection]
Summary:
For cross-drainage structures, accurate catchment and cross-section data are essential, with design based on maximum flood discharge and velocity. Trial pits inform foundation design. Follow IRC 13 and IRC 78 for detailed structural guidelines.
IRC SP 19: Preparation & Presentation of Detailed Project Report (DPR)
The DPR should be comprehensive, systematic, and clear for technical, administrative, and financial approval. It is divided into three parts, with the Project Report as the core document.
| Parameter | Details/Observations | Deficiencies/Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Type of Structure | Culvert/Bridge | |
| Span & Vent Height | e.g., 6 m span, 2 m vent height | |
| Roadway Width | e.g., 7 m | |
| Condition | Good/Fair/Poor (foundations, superstructure) | Identify defects |
| Load Capacity | e.g., 20 tons | |
| Waterway Adequacy | Adequate/Inadequate | Signs of silting/scour |
flowchart TD
A[Survey & Investigations] --> B[Data Collection]
B --> C[Analysis & Design]
C --> D[Preparation of DPR]
D --> E[Submission for Approval]
Summary: DPR preparation per IRC SP 19 involves a structured, detailed report covering all technical, economic, and social aspects, supported by data, calculations, and clear presentation to
IRC SP 19: Guiding Principles for Route Selection and Highway Location
[ \text{Total Cost} = C_{\text{construction}} + C_{\text{maintenance}} + C_{\text{user}} ]
Where:
flowchart TD
A[Start: Identify Project Need] --> B[Preliminary Surveys]
B --> C[Consider Topography & Environment]
C --> D[Estimate Construction & Maintenance Costs]
D --> E[Estimate Road User Costs]
E --> F{Evaluate Social & Environmental Impact}
F -->|Acceptable| G[Select Optimal Route]
F -->|Not Acceptable| B
G --> H[Finalize Route & Design]
Summary: Route selection in IRC SP 19 prioritizes minimizing total transportation cost while balancing environmental and social factors, requiring detailed study and engineering judgment.
IRC SP 19 Appendix-4 provides a comprehensive Check List of Major Operations Involved in Survey and Investigation for a Road Project. Key points include:
| Operation | Reference Page |
|---|---|
| Soil Investigations (Low Embank) | 34 |
| Special Investigations (High Embank) | 36 |
| Pavement Design (Flexible/Rigid) | 37 |
| Road Inventory & Condition Survey | 43 |
| Drainage Studies | 46-47 |
| Cross-Drainage Structures | 48 |
| Project Report Preparation | 50-57 |
This checklist ensures all critical survey and investigation aspects are covered for a robust road project planning phase.
flowchart TD
A[Start: Study Available Info] --> B[Soil Investigations]
B --> C{Type of Embankment}
C -->|Low| D[Low Embankment Soil Tests]
C -->|High| E[High Embankment Special Tests]
B --> F[Cut Section Soil Tests]
B --> G[Landslide Area Tests]
A --> H[Pavement Design Investigations]
H --> I[Flexible Pavement]
H --> J[Rigid Pavement]
A --> K[Material & Water Quality Tests]
A --> L[Road Inventory & Condition Survey]
A --> M[Drainage Studies]
M --> N[High Flood
Typical Road Inventory Format (IRC SP 19 - Clause 14)
Road inventory is essential for assessing existing roads before improvement. Key components include:
| Parameter | Details to Record |
|---|---|
| Date & Time of Observation | |
| Climate Conditions (hot/humid/cold) | |
| Air Temperature (°C) | |
| Annual Rainfall (mm) | |
| Temperature Correction Applied? | Yes / No |
| Seasonal Variation Correction? | Yes / No |
| SI No. | Test Location & Lane ID | Pavement Temp (°C) | Soil Type & Plasticity | Moisture Content (%) | Dial Readings (Initial, Intermediate, Final) | Rebound Deflection (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flowchart TD
A[Start Road Inventory] --> B[Collect Road Geometry Data]
B --> C{Existing Data Available?}
C -->|Yes| D[Use Existing Road & Bridge Registers]
C -->|No| E[Conduct Fresh Road Inventory]
E --> F[Measure Riding Quality, Pavement Width, Profiles]
F --> G[Assess Soil & Pavement Properties]
G --> H[Perform Deflection Tests (Benkelman Beam)]
H --> I[Compile Data into Road Data Bank]
D --> I
I --> J[Use Data for Economic & Design Analysis]
This format ensures comprehensive data collection for effective road improvement planning.
Key Laboratory Tests for Highway Embankments (IRC SP 19)
Based on IRC SP 19 and related IRC codes (IRC:36, IRC:37):
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Location & Date | Sampling details |
| Soil Type | Visual identification |
| Sieve Analysis | % passing 4.75 mm, 2 mm, 425 micron, 75 micron |
| Sand Content | % passing 4.75 mm - % passing 75 micron |
| Atterberg Limits | LL, PL, PI (%) |
| Max Dry Density & OMC | g/cc and % |
| Field Dry Density | At subgrade level |
| CBR Values | Soaked and unsoaked (%) |
| Water Table Depth | m below subgrade |
[ \text{Sand Content (%)} = % \text{passing 4.75 mm sieve} - % \text{passing 75 micron sieve
Frequently Asked
Recommended Procedures for Preliminary and Detailed Surveys (IRC SP 19)
Loading diagram...
This structured approach ensures accuracy and completeness for road project surveys as per IRC SP 19.
IRC SP 19 Guidance on Soil and Material Investigations for Highway Embankments
Objective: Obtain engineering parameters (shear strength, unit weight, moisture, consolidation) for quantitative embankment design, especially for high embankments.
Key References:
Investigations Include:
Tools Recommended:
| Parameter | Purpose | Typical Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Shear Strength | Stability against slip failure | Direct shear, triaxial tests |
| Unit Weight & Moisture | Material characterization | Oven drying, density tests |
| Consolidation | Settlement prediction | Oedometer test |
Loading diagram...
This structured approach ensures safe, economical embankment design aligned with IRC SP 19.
Traffic Data and Growth Rate Estimation Methods in IRC SP 19
IRC SP 19 specifies three main methods for traffic growth estimation:
[ \text{Growth Rate (%)} = \left[(1 + \text{Population Growth}) \times (1 + \text{Income Growth}) - 1\right] \times 100 \times E ]
Where E = elasticity of transport demand (varies by vehicle type and time period):
| Vehicle Type | 1st 5 Years | 2nd 5 Years | 3rd 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cars, Jeeps, Vans (E) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| Buses (E) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Two & Three Wheelers (E) | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
This structured approach ensures realistic traffic projections incorporating socio-economic dynamics and vehicle mix changes over time.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in IRC SP 19 involves the following key steps during project preparation:
Preliminary Screening & Environmental Analysis
Environmental Design
Compliance with Legislation
Environmental Management Action Plan (EMAP)
Note: Improvement works with marginal land acquisition along existing roads may be exempt from environmental clearance.
Loading diagram...
For detailed procedures, refer to IRC:104 and MOEF guidelines.
As per IRC SP 19, the Detailed Project Report (DPR) should be prepared in three parts and must comprehensively present survey data and project proposals for clear understanding and approval.
Key components of the DPR Project Report include:
Design calculations and supporting data must be attached.
Summary Table:
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Executive Summary | Project highlights |
| Socio-economic Profile | Demographics & economy |
| Traffic Surveys & Forecasts | Traffic data |
| Engineering Surveys | Site & road features |
| Pavement & Design Standards | Materials, codes |
| Drainage & Environmental | Waterways, social impact |
| Costs & Economic Analysis | Budgeting, viability |
| Construction & Miscellaneous | Execution plan, other details |
Refer to Appendices 4, 5 & 6 for checklists ensuring completeness.
Loading diagram...
This structure ensures clarity, comprehensiveness, and facilitates sanction and execution.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC SP 19. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required