IRC SP 1212018AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Guidelines for Use of Iron, Steel and Copper Slag in the Construction of Rural Roads

IRC SP 121-2018 provides comprehensive guidelines for the use of iron, steel, and copper slag in rural road construction. It covers the characterization, processing, and application of these industrial by-products as embankment fill, subgrade, base, and surface materials, ensuring sustainable and cost-effective pavement solutions. This standard is essential for engineers and planners involved in rural infrastructure development seeking to optimize material use while maintaining structural integrity and environmental safety.

15Sections
117Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
2018Edition
Roads and Bridges IRC- Indian road congress Category
Alternative search terms: IRC SP 121 PDF, IRC SP 121 pdf free download, IRC SP 121 free download pdf, IRCSP121 PDF, IRC-SP-121 PDF, IRC SP 121 2018 PDF, IRC SP 121:2018 PDF, IRC SP 121-2018 PDF, IRC SP 121 (2018) PDF, IRC SP 121 2018 edition PDF, IRC SP 121 edition 2018 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IRC SP 121-2018 provides comprehensive guidelines for the use of iron, steel, and copper slag in rural road construction. It covers the characterization, processing, and application of these industrial by-products as embankment fill, subgrade, base, and surface materials, ensuring sustainable and cost-effective pavement solutions. This standard is essential for engineers and planners involved in rural infrastructure development seeking to optimize material use while maintaining structural integrity and environmental safety.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Highway Design Engineers
  • Pavement Material Specialists
  • Rural Road Construction Contractors
  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Environmental Engineers
  • Quality Control Inspectors
  • Government Road Authorities

Key Topics Covered

Chemical and physical properties of iron, steel, and copper slag
Mechanical stabilization techniques for copper slag embankments
Mixing proportions of copper slag with local soils and fly ash
Use of slag as embankment fill and subgrade material
Specifications for slag in granular subbase and base layers
Application of slag in Water Bound Macadam (WBM) and Wet Mix Macadam (WMM)
Use of slag aggregates in bituminous surface courses
Construction methodologies for slag-based pavement layers
Quality control tests for slag materials and mixes
Environmental considerations and erosion control measures
Design and protection of slag embankment slopes
Typical rural road cross sections incorporating slag
Case studies demonstrating slag utilization
Handling and compaction procedures for slag materials
Assessment of permeability and shear strength characteristics

Table of Contents

1Scope

IRC SP 121 - Scope & Key Specifications Summary

Scope:
IRC SP 121 covers the use of various slags (Iron & Steel Slag, Copper Slag) in pavement construction, including their physical, chemical, and geotechnical properties, design, and specifications for embankments, subgrade, base, and drainage layers.


Key Specifications & Procedures:

  • Sieves for Gradation (Clause 31.5 d):
    Standard IS sieve sizes:

    • 31.5 mm, 26.5 mm, 13.2 mm, 4.75 mm, 2.36 mm, 500 µm, 75 µm
  • Expansion Measuring Apparatus (Clause 31.5 e):
    As per Fig. A1 (refer to IRC SP 121 Annexure for details).

  • Specimen Preparation (Clause 4.1):

    • Use collar, perforated base plate, spacer disc, and filter paper.
    • Moisture content samples ≥ 500 g; prepare new specimens if moisture deviates >1% from optimum.
    • Fill mould in 3 layers with ~50 mm falling height, ram each layer 92 times from 450 mm height.
    • Remove collar, shave excess, fill holes with fine material, reform surface.
    • Turn mould upside down, remove spacer disc, reattach perforated base plate with filter paper.
    • Calculate wet density:

    [ \text{Wet Density} = \frac{\text{Mass of Rammed Specimen}}{\text{Volume of Mould}} ]


Table: Typical IS Sieves for Slag Gradation

Sieve Size (mm)Description
31.5Coarse aggregate
26.5Coarse aggregate
13.2Medium aggregate
4.75Fine aggregate
2.36Fine aggregate
0.5 (500 µm)Sand fraction
0.075 (75 µm)Fines (silt/clay)

flowchart TD
    A[Prepare Mould] --> B[Attach Collar & Base Plate]
    B --> C
1.1Blast Furnace Slag

Blast Furnace Slag (BFS) - Key Points from IRC SP 121

1. Definition

  • BFS is a non-metallic byproduct from pig iron production.
  • Mainly composed of silicates, alumina-silicates, and calcium-alumina-silicates.
  • Constitutes ~20% by mass of iron production.

2. Types of BFS by Cooling Method

Cooling MethodSlag TypeCharacteristics
Air coolingAir-cooled slagDense, crystalline, used in aggregates
Controlled water coolingGranulated slagGlassy, fine, used in cement blends
Rapid water quenchingExpanded slagLightweight, porous, used in insulation

3. Chemical Composition (Typical % from Indian Steel Plants)

ComponentRange (BF Slag)
SiO₂30 - 35
Al₂O₃15 - 25
CaO30 - 36
MgO7 - 11
FeO0.2 - 0.8
MnO~0.1 - 0.6
S0.5 - 1.0

4. Engineering Properties

  • Physical properties vary with cooling method.
  • Granulated slag is reactive and used as supplementary cementitious material.
  • Air-cooled slag is used as aggregate due to hardness.
  • Expanded slag is lightweight and used for insulation or lightweight concrete.
flowchart LR
    A[Molten Slag] --> B{Cooling Method}
    B --> C[Air Cooling]
    B --> D[Controlled Water Cooling]
    B --> E[Rapid Water Quenching]
    C --> F[Air-cooled Slag]
    D --> G[Granulated Slag]
    E --> H[Expanded Slag]

Summary: BFS chemical composition is fairly consistent, but physical properties depend on cooling. Use granulated slag for cementitious applications; air-cooled slag for aggregates; expanded slag for lightweight materials.

1.2Electric Arc Furnace Slag (EAFS)

Electric Arc Furnace Slag (EAFS) - Key Specifications from IRC:SP:121-2018

Physical & Engineering Properties (Table 2 Summary)

PropertyEAFS Typical ValuesTest Method
Specific Gravity (Dry SSD)3.3 to 3.4ASTM C124/128
Water Absorption (%)1-2 (Coarse), 2-4 (Fine)ASTM C566
Dry Strength (ksi)~56 (386 MPa)AS 1142.22
Wet Strength (ksi)54 to 67.4 (372 to 465 MPa)AS 1142.22
Wet/Dry Strength Variation (%)5 to 15AS 1142.22
Micro Deval Abrasion (%)16ASTM D6928
Polished Aggregate Friction Value (PAFV)58 to 63ASTM D3319
Sodium Sulphate Soundness (%)<4ASTM C88
Maximum Dry Density (kN/m³)22.6 to 23.5ASTM D698
Optimum Moisture Content (%)8 to 12ASTM D698

Key Characteristics:

  • Strong, dense, non-porous, cubical shape
  • Excellent resistance to polishing and rutting
  • Good affinity to bitumen — ideal for bituminous surface treatments
  • Contains 10-20% metallic iron; metal-free slag used after magnetic separation
  • Vesicular surface promotes particle interlock and high shear strength

Usage Notes:

  • Use EAFS as coarse and fine aggregates in bituminous mixes for durable, skid-resistant pavements.
  • Ensure compliance with specified moisture content and density for compaction.

flowchart LR
    A[Steel Making Process] --> B[Electric Arc Furnace]
    B --> C[Steel Slag Produced]
    C --> D[Magnetic Separation]
    D --> E[Metallic Iron Removed]
    E --> F[Crushing & Screening
1.3Chemical Composition and Engineering Properties

Key Chemical Composition & Engineering Properties from IRC:SP:121-2018

1. Chemical Composition of Slags (% by weight)

Plant / Slag TypeSiO₂Al₂O₃CaOMgOMnOFeOS
Bhilai BF Slag34.5220.6632.4310.090.230.570.77
Bhilai Steel Slag14.201.4042.909.591.6918.201.70
Bokaro BF Slag30.06-31.8521.12-22.7132.48-34.1710.12-10.39-0.26-0.37-
Bokaro Steel Slag12.15-15.821.07-1.6346.52-53.528.14-13.12-17.01-18.52-
Copper Slag28-353-52-51-3-40-45 (Fe₂O₃)0.5-1.5 (SO₂)

BF = Blast Furnace Slag, Steel Slag = Basic Oxygen Furnace/ Electric Arc Furnace Slag


2. Engineering Properties of Slags (Typical Ranges)

PropertyACBFS (Blast Furnace Slag)BOFS (Steel Slag)EAFS (Steel Slag)Test Method
Specific Gravity (Dry SSD)2.45 - 2.653.30 - 3.48~3.30 - 3.40ASTM C124/128
Water Absorption (%)3 - 71 - 41 - 4ASTM C566
Dry
2Slag as Pavement Material

Key Specifications & Formulas for Slag as Pavement Material (IRC SP 121)

1. Slag Usage in Pavement Layers

  • Unbound Layers: Granular Subbase & Base (particle interlock, shear strength)
  • Bound Layers: Stabilized Subbase & Base (chemical bonding + particle interlock)
  • Asphalt & Concrete Layers: Aggregates for surface courses and PCC

2. Important Properties of Slag Aggregates

  • Higher density (~20% more than conventional aggregates)
  • Cubical shape with fractured faces → better mechanical interlock
  • Higher skid resistance (better friction)
  • Higher affinity to bitumen → lower stripping

3. Applications (Table 5 Summary)

ApplicationSteel Slag (BOFS, EAFS)Iron Slag (ACBFS, GBFS)
Open Graded Premix Carpet✓ (except GBFS)
Surface Dressing✓ (except GBFS)
Bituminous Macadam✓ (except GBFS)
Semi Dense Bituminous Concrete✓ (except GBFS)
Cement Concrete PavementLimited (mostly Iron Slag)✓ (mostly Iron Slag)
Granular Base & Subbase✓ (mostly Steel Slag)Partial

Note: Increase binder content by 0.5% for slag aggregates in bituminous surfacing due to vesicular nature.

4. Stabilization Design Parameter (IRC:37)

  • Elastic Modulus, E (MPa) = 1000 × UCS (MPa)
    Where UCS = Unconfined Compressive Strength after 28 days curing

Summary Diagram: Slag in Pavement Layers

graph TD
    A[Slag as Pavement Material] --> B[Unbound Layers]
    A --> C[Bound Layers]
    A --> D[Asphalt & Concrete Layers]
    B --> B1[Granular Subbase]
    B --> B2[Granular Base]
    C --> C1[Stabilized Subbase/Base]
    D --> D1[Bituminous Surfacing]
    D --> D2[Concrete Pavement]

For detailed design,

4.1Need for Mechanical Stabilisation of Copper Slag

Mechanical Stabilisation of Copper Slag (IRC SP 121 - Clause 4.1)

Copper slag alone is cohesionless and poorly graded, making compaction and embankment construction difficult. Mechanical stabilization by mixing with local soil or pond ash improves:

  • Gradation
  • Dry density
  • Shear strength (c, φ)
  • California Bearing Ratio (CBR)

Key Specifications & Parameters (from Table 3):

PropertyCopper Slag + SoilCopper Slag + Pond AshCopper Slag (Fine + Coarse)
Plasticity Index (PI)NP - 14*NPNP
Maximum Dry Density (MDD) (kN/m³)20 - 2515 - 2422 - 25
Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) (%)6 - 137 - 305 - 12
Cohesion, c (kN/m²) (unselected)10*00
Angle of Internal Friction, φ (°) (selected)30 - 3425 - 3730 - 38
Permeability (m/sec)2×10⁻⁶7×10⁻⁶1.2×10⁻⁶
CBR (%)10* - 808 - 6522 - 65

* For Black Cotton Soils

Important Notes:

  • PI < 45 as per MoRD specifications.
  • Mix proportions must be optimized through laboratory tests for best performance.
  • Mechanical stabilization enhances embankment stability and durability.
flowchart LR
    A[Copper Slag (Cohesionless)] --> B[Mix with Soil / Pond Ash]
    B --> C[Improved Gradation & Density]
    C --> D[Enhanced Shear Strength (c, φ)]
    D --> E[Better CBR & Permeability]
    E --> F[Suitable for Embankment Construction]

This approach ensures embankment materials meet IRC and MoRD standards for

4.2Earth Cover for Protection of Slopes

Earth Cover for Protection of Slopes (IRC SP 121 - Clause 4.2 & 14.4)

  • Purpose: Prevent erosion of copper slag-soil/fly ash stabilized embankment slopes.

  • Thickness of Earth Cover:

    • Embankment height ≤ 3 m:
      • Horizontal thickness = 0.3 m
      • Minimum dry density = 14.4 kN/m³
    • Embankment height > 3 m:
      • Horizontal thickness = 0.5 m
      • Minimum dry density = 15.2 kN/m³
      • Intermediate soil layers of 0.2 m thickness every 2 m height recommended for feasibility.
  • Soil Properties:

    • Plasticity Index (PI) = 10 to 20
    • Must comply with MoRD Section 301 specifications.
    • When used as subgrade, dry density ≥ 16.5 kN/m³
  • Construction Note:
    Side earth cover must be placed simultaneously with copper slag-soil/fly ash core; adding later is prohibited.


Summary Table

Embankment HeightEarth Cover Thickness (Horizontal)Min Dry Density (kN/m³)Additional Notes
≤ 3 m0.3 m14.4
> 3 m0.5 m15.2Intermediate 0.2 m layers every 2 m height

This ensures slope stability and erosion resistance for copper slag embankments.

5.1Site Investigation

IRC SP 121: Site Investigation Key Points

1. Scope of Site Investigation (Clause 5.1)

  • Investigate in-situ soil characteristics to assess suitability for copper slag embankment.
  • Collect data on:
    • Local soils/wastes availability (quantity, location, lead distance).
    • Topography via total station survey for embankment profile & quantity estimation.
    • Hydrological data: rainfall & groundwater for drainage design and slope stability evaluation.
  • Conduct subsoil investigation to at least 2× embankment height depth to determine:
    • Soil/rock strata nature and extent.
    • Bulk density.
    • Shear strength parameters (cohesion c, angle of internal friction φ).

2. Key Parameters for Stability & Design

ParameterImportance
Bulk Density (γ)Affects embankment weight & stress
Shear Strength (c, φ)Critical for slope stability analysis
Soil StratificationDetermines foundation bearing & seepage

3. General Formula for Slope Stability Factor of Safety (FOS)

[ FOS = \frac{c' \cdot L + (W \cos \alpha - uL) \tan \phi'}{W \sin \alpha} ] Where:

  • (c') = effective cohesion
  • (L) = length of slip surface
  • (W) = weight of sliding mass
  • (\alpha) = slope angle
  • (u) = pore water pressure

4. Additional Recommendations

  • Use site-specific data for drainage design to prevent pore pressure increase.
  • Mix copper slag with fly ash/local soil as per availability and geotechnical compatibility (Clause 4.1).
  • Follow Clause 3.2 for geotechnical characteristics and Clause 5.2 for slope stability analysis.
flowchart TD
    A[Site Investigation]
    A --> B[Local Soils & Wastes Availability]
    A --> C[Topography Survey]
    A --> D[Hydrological Data Collection]
    A --> E[Subsoil Investigation]
    E --> F[Bulk Density]
    E --> G[Shear Strength (c, φ)]
6.1Slag as Subgrade Material

Key Specifications & Formulas for Slag as Subgrade Material (IRC SP 121):

1. Types of Slag Used

  • Steel Slag (BOFS, EAFS, ACBFS): Preferred for better strength, abrasion, impact resistance.
  • Blast Furnace Slag (GBFS): Less preferred for bituminous surfacing.

2. Important Characteristics

  • Higher skid resistance (due to higher friction).
  • Steel slag density ~20% higher than conventional materials.
  • Cubical shape with fractured faces → good mechanical interlock.
  • Higher bitumen affinity → lower stripping.

3. Usage Table (Excerpt from Table 5)

ApplicationSteel Slag (BOFS, EAFS, ACBFS)Blast Furnace Slag (GBFS)
Open Graded Premix Carpet
Surface Dressing
Bituminous Macadam
Semi Dense Bituminous Concrete
Granular Sub-base✓ (unstabilised & stabilised)✓ (stabilised only)

4. Binder Content Adjustment

  • Increase binder content by 0.5% over MoRD specs when using slag due to vesicular nature.

5. Stabilisation & Elastic Modulus

  • Elastic Modulus (E) related to UCS by:

[ \boxed{E = 1000 \times UCS} ]

Where:

  • (E) = Elastic Modulus (MPa)
  • (UCS) = Unconfined Compressive Strength (MPa) after 28 days curing

Summary Diagram: Slag Use in Pavement Layers

graph TD
    A[Slag Types] --> B[Steel Slag]
    A --> C[Blast Furnace Slag]
    B --> D[Bituminous Surfacing]
    B --> E[Granular Base/Sub-base]
    C --> F[Limited to Stabilised Sub-base & Concrete]
    D --> G[Increase Binder by 0.5%]

References:

  • IRC SP 121: Clause 6.1, Table 5
  • IRC:37 (Elastic modulus formula)
6.2Slag as Shoulder Material

Slag as Shoulder Material — IRC SP 121 Key Points

1. Applications of Slag in Pavement Layers (Fig.7)

  • Steel/Iron slag used in:
    • Shoulder (steel slag fines + soil)
    • Granular Subbase (GSB)
    • Open Graded PMC (from steel/iron slag)
  • Soil cover needed if fines content is high in embankment/subgrade mixed with slag.

2. Properties of Slag Aggregates (Clause 2.3)

  • Steel slag advantages:
    • 20% higher density than traditional aggregates
    • Cubical shape with fractured faces → better interlock
    • Higher friction → better skid resistance
    • Better bitumen affinity → lower stripping
  • Binder content for bituminous surfacing with slag should be increased by 0.5% over normal MoRD values.

3. Typical Uses of Slag (Table 5 Summary)

ApplicationSteel Slag (BOFS, EAFS)Iron Slag (ACBFS, GBFS)
Open Graded Premix Carpet✓ (except GBFS)
Surface Dressing✓ (except GBFS)
Bituminous Macadam✓ (except GBFS)
Cement Concrete PavementLimited (mostly iron slag)✓ (ACBFS, GBFS)
Granular Base/Subbase✓ (mostly steel slag)Some use in stabilized base

4. Stabilisation & Design Parameters (Clause 3)

  • Elastic Modulus (E) for slag-bound materials:

    [ E = 1000 \times UCS ]

    Where:

    • (E) = Elastic Modulus (MPa)
    • (UCS) = Unconfined Compressive Strength after 28 days (MPa)

flowchart TD
    A[Slag Material] --> B[Shoulder: Steel slag fines + soil]
    A --> C[Granular Subbase (GSB)]
    A --> D[Open Graded PMC]
    B --> E[Soil cover if fines high]
    C --> F[Unstabilised or Stabilised]
    D -->
9.1Specifications for Copper Slag in Water Bound Macadam (WBM)

Specifications for Copper Slag in Water Bound Macadam (WBM) - IRC SP 121


Key Points:

  • Copper Slag Proportion in WBM:

    • Coarse copper slag can replace up to 50% of 10 mm aggregates in 'Type B' screenings.
    • Must satisfy MoRD gradation requirements for screenings (Table 400.12).
  • Mixing Guidelines:

    • Fine slag may be mixed with conventional aggregates (40 mm, 20 mm, 10 mm, stone dust) in 20-30% proportion for Wet Mix Macadam (WMM).
    • If fine slag unavailable, stone dust is used.
  • Cement Stabilisation:

    • Copper slag (coarse) can be cement stabilized with 3-6% cement.
    • Copper slag content in mixes can be up to 75%.
    • Required UCS (Unconfined Compressive Strength) after 7 days curing:
      • 1.7 MPa for sub-base
      • 3.0 MPa for base layer (as per IRC:SP:72)

Gradation & Replacement Summary (per MoRD Tables 400.1A, 400.1B, 400.12):

Aggregate SizeCopper Slag Replacement (%)Remarks
10 mmUp to 50% (coarse slag)For Type B screenings
40, 20, 10 mm20-30% (fine/coarse slag)For WMM gradation
Fine aggregates30-50%For sub-base layer

Additional Notes:

  • Copper slag mixtures exhibit good permeability, suitable for drainage layers.
  • Laboratory testing (7-day UCS) is mandatory for stabilised mixes.
  • Gradation must comply with MoRD specifications to ensure performance.

flowchart LR
    A[Conventional Aggregates] --> B[Mix with Copper Slag]
    B --> C{Copper Slag Type}
    C -->|Coarse| D[Replace up to 50% of 10 mm aggregate in WBM]
    C -->|Fine or Fine+Coarse| E[Replace 20-30% in WMM]
9.2Specifications for Copper Slag in Wet Mix Macadam (WMM)

Specifications for Copper Slag in Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) – IRC SP 121

1. Gradation and Mix Proportion (Clause 9.2)

  • Copper slag (fine/coarse/fine+coarse) can replace 20-30% of conventional aggregates (40 mm, 20 mm, 10 mm, stone dust).
  • If fine slag unavailable, use stone dust.
  • Gradation must meet MoRD Table 400.12 for WMM.

2. Mix Preparation & Compaction (Clause 11.3)

  • Use conventional WMM plant; adjust to achieve uniform design gradation.
  • Wet mix at Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) is non-plastic.
  • Compact immediately with rollers to avoid segregation.
  • Physical and gradation requirements follow MoRD Section 400.

3. Cement Stabilized Copper Slag (Clause 1.7)

  • Copper slag content in mixes ~ 75%.
  • Cement content: 3-6%.
  • Design UCS (7-day cured) targets:
    • 1.7 MPa for sub-base
    • 3.0 MPa for base layer (per IRC:SP:72)

4. Water Bound Macadam (Clause 9.1)

  • Coarse copper slag can replace 50% of 10 mm aggregates in 'Type B' screenings.
  • Must satisfy MoRD gradation requirements.

Key Table: Typical Gradation Limits for WMM (MoRD Table 400.12)

Sieve Size (mm)% Passing (Min)% Passing (Max)
40100100
207090
104060
4.752540
0.4251020
0.075510

flowchart LR
  A[Conventional Aggregates + Copper Slag (20-30%)] --> B[Mixing in WMM Plant]
  B --> C[Wet Mix @ OMC (Non-Plastic)]
  C -->
10Specifications for Copper Slag in Bituminous Surface Courses

Key Specifications for Copper Slag in Bituminous Surface Courses (IRC SP 121):

1. Gradation & Mixing (Clause 9.2 & 7)

  • Copper slag (fine/coarse or combined) can replace 20-30% of conventional aggregates (40 mm, 20 mm, 10 mm, stone dust) in Wet Mix Macadam (WMM).
  • For granular sub-base, 30-50% replacement of fine aggregates by copper slag is allowed.
  • If fine slag is unavailable, use stone dust.

2. Cement Stabilized Mix (Clause 8)

  • Copper slag content ~ 75% in sub-base/base layers.
  • Cement content: 3-6%.
  • Design UCS (Unconfined Compressive Strength):
    • Sub-base: ≥ 1.7 MPa
    • Base: ≥ 3 MPa (IRC:SP:72)
  • 7-day UCS test mandatory for design validation.

3. Volumetric Expansion Ratio (Clause 5)

[ E = 100 \times \frac{D_f - D_i}{H} ]

  • (E): volumetric expansion ratio (%)
  • (D_f): last dial gauge reading (mm)
  • (D_i): first dial gauge reading (mm)
  • (H): initial specimen height = 125 mm

Average over 3 specimens, round to 1 decimal place.

4. Permeability & Drainage (Clause 6.3)

  • Copper slag mixtures show good permeability, suitable for drainage layers.

Summary Table: Copper Slag Usage in Road Layers

LayerCopper Slag %Cement %UCS (MPa)Remarks
Granular Sub-base30-50%--Replace fine aggregates
Cement Stabilized Base~75%3-6%≥37-day UCS test required
WMM20-30%--Mix with conventional aggregates

flowchart LR
    A[Conventional Aggregates] -->|20-30% replaced| B[Copper Slag in WMM]
    C[Fine Aggreg
11Method Statement for Construction

IRC SP 121: Method Statement for Construction — Key Points


1. Specimen Preparation (Clause 4.1)

  • Use mould with collar, perforated base plate, spacer disc, and filter paper.
  • Moisture content measured on two 500g samples; if ±1% from optimum moisture, remake specimens.
  • Sample poured in 3 layers with ~50 mm falling height.
  • Ram each layer uniformly 92 times from 450 mm height on a rigid flat surface.
  • Remove collar, shave excess, fill holes with fine materials, reform surface.
  • Turn mould upside down gently, remove spacer and base plate, reattach filter paper.
  • Clean specimen outside, measure total mass.
  • Calculate wet density:
    [ \text{Wet Density} = \frac{\text{Mass of specimen}}{\text{Volume of mould}} ]

2. Sieves for Testing (Clause 31.5 d)

  • IS Sieves sizes:
    • 31.5 mm
    • 26.5 mm
    • 13.2 mm
    • 4.75 mm
    • 2.36 mm
    • 500 µm
    • 75 µm

3. Seal Coat Usage (Clause 10.2)

  • Open Graded Premix Carpet/Bituminous Macadam void sealing.
  • Copper slag replacement:
    • 60-70% for Type B premixed seal coat.
    • 20-25% for Type A (liquid) and Type C seal coats.

4. Expansion Measuring Apparatus (Clause 31.5 e)

  • Refer Fig. A1 (not provided here) for apparatus setup.

Summary Diagram: Specimen Preparation Steps

flowchart TD
    A[Attach collar & base plate] --> B[Place spacer disc & filter paper]
    B --> C[Measure moisture content]
    C --> D[Pour sample in 3 layers]
    D --> E[Ram each layer 92 times from 450mm height]
    E --> F[Remove collar & shave excess]
    F --> G[Fill holes & reform surface]
    G --> H[Turn mould upside down, remove spacer & base]
    H --> I[Attach filter paper & base plate
12Quality Control Tests

Quality Control Tests as per IRC SP 121 (Ref: IS:383-2016)

Key Specifications & Procedures

  • Sieves (Clause 31.5 d):
    Use IS sieves of sizes:
    31.5 mm, 26.5 mm, 13.2 mm, 4.75 mm, 2.36 mm, 500 µm, 75 µm

  • Specimen Preparation (Clause 4.1):

    • Attach collar & perforated base plate, place spacer disc and filter paper.
    • Moisture content test on two 500 g samples; if moisture differs by ≥1% from optimum, prepare new specimens.
    • Fill mould in 3 equal layers, ramming each with 92 free drops of 4.5 kg rammer from 450 mm height on rigid base.
    • Remove collar, shave excess, fill holes with fine material, reform surface.
    • Turn mould upside down, remove spacer & base plate, reattach filter paper and base plate.
    • Measure total mass, calculate wet density:
      [ \text{Wet Density} = \frac{\text{Mass of specimen}}{\text{Volume of mould}} ]
  • Expansion Measuring Apparatus (Clause 31.5 e):
    Follow Fig. A1 for apparatus setup (not shown here).

Additional Tests (Referenced Standards)

TestStandardPurpose
Wet/Dry Strength VariationIRC 67.4Strength durability (372.3-464.7 MPa)
Abrasion ResistanceASTM D6928Aggregate degradation
Polished Aggregate Friction Value (PAFV)ASTM D3319Surface friction evaluation
Soundness of AggregatesASTM C88Resistance to sodium sulphate
Maximum Dry DensityIS/IRCCompaction characteristics

Summary Diagram: Specimen Preparation Steps

flowchart TD
    A[Attach collar & base plate] --> B[Place spacer disc & filter paper]
    B --> C[Measure moisture content on 2 samples]
    C --> D{Moisture within 1% of optimum?}
    D -- No --> B

Popular Questions About IRC SP 121

?What are the recommended proportions for mixing copper slag with local soils or fly ash for embankment construction?

Recommended Mixing Proportions for Copper Slag in Embankments (IRC SP 121):

  • With Local Soils (clayey/expansive/non-expansive):

    • Mix copper slag (fine/coarse) in the range 10% to 75% by weight.
    • Optimize mix based on lab geotechnical tests to meet MoRD design criteria (e.g., Plasticity Index 10-20, dry density, CBR).
  • With Fly Ash/Other Wastes:

    • Copper slag may be mixed with fly ash in the range 10% to 75%.
    • Laboratory feasibility study is essential to optimize proportions ensuring design compliance.
  • Key Material Requirements:

    • Soil PI: 10-20 (as per MoRD Section 301).
    • Fly ash should be sun-dried and conditioned with 1-2% moisture before mixing to reduce dust.
  • Purpose:

    • Mixing improves gradation, compaction, shear strength, and CBR of embankment fill.

Summary Table

Material MixCopper Slag Content (%)Notes
Copper Slag + Local Soil10 - 75Optimize via lab tests
Copper Slag + Fly Ash10 - 75Lab feasibility study required

Loading diagram...

This ensures embankment materials have adequate plasticity, density, and strength for stable construction.

?How does the mechanical stabilization of copper slag improve its suitability for rural road embankments?

Mechanical stabilization of copper slag improves its suitability for rural road embankments by addressing its inherent cohesionless and poorly graded nature:

  • Improved Gradation: Mixing copper slag with local soil or pond ash enhances particle size distribution, making compaction easier.
  • Increased Density & Strength: Stabilization increases dry density, shear strength, and CBR (California Bearing Ratio), essential for embankment stability.
  • Plasticity Control: Ensures Plasticity Index (PI) remains below 45, meeting MoRD specifications for embankment fill.
  • Cement Stabilization: Adding 3-6% cement to copper slag (up to 75% content) creates a stabilized mix with improved Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS):
    • 1.7 MPa for sub-base layers
    • 3 MPa for base layers (IRC:SP:72)
  • Laboratory Testing: 7-day UCS tests on cured specimens confirm design strength.

This mechanical stabilization ensures embankments are durable, compactable, and meet rural road construction standards.

Loading diagram...
?What are the key physical and chemical properties of iron, steel, and copper slag relevant to pavement applications?

Key Physical and Chemical Properties of Iron, Steel, and Copper Slag for Pavement Applications (IRC:SP:121)

Copper Slag (Table 1)

  • Specific Gravity: 3.2 - 3.6
  • Loss on Ignition: Nil
  • Chemical Composition (%):
    • Fe2O3: 40-45
    • SiO2: 28-35
    • Al2O3: 3-5
    • SO2: 0.5-1.5
    • CaO: 2-5
    • MgO: 1-3
    • CuO: 0.4-0.5

Iron and Steel Slag (Table 2)

PropertyBlast Furnace Slag (ACBFS)Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag (BOFS)Electric Arc Furnace Slag (EAFS)
Specific Gravity (Dry SSD)2.45 - 2.653.30 - 3.48~3.30 - 3.40
Water Absorption (%)3 - 71 - 41 - 4
Dry Strength (MPa)131 - 155~426~386
Wet Strength (MPa)101 - 140357 - 465372 - 465
Micro Deval Abrasion (%)15 - 2212 - 1816
Polished Aggregate Friction5358 - 6358 - 63
Sodium Sulphate Soundness (%)5<4<4

Relevance to Pavement Applications:

  • High specific gravity and strength make these slags suitable as aggregates in base and sub-base layers.
  • Low water absorption ensures durability.
  • Chemical stability (low loss on ignition, controlled SO2 and CaO) minimizes volumetric expansion and environmental impact.
  • Good friction and abrasion resistance improve skid resistance and durability.
  • Copper slag can replace 30-50% of fine aggregates in sub
?Which types of slag are suitable for use in bituminous surface courses and what are the gradation requirements?

Suitable Slag Types for Bituminous Surface Courses (IRC SP 121):

  • Steel Slags: BOFS (Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag), EAFS (Electric Arc Furnace Slag), ACBFS (Air Cooled Blast Furnace Slag) are suitable.
  • Blast Furnace Slag (GBFS): Not recommended for bituminous surfacing.
  • Copper Slag: Fine copper slag is not suitable for bituminous construction; coarse or mixed slag can replace fine aggregates up to 15-20%.

Key Points:

  • Steel slags preferred due to better strength, abrasion resistance, and higher affinity to bitumen.
  • Binder content should be increased by 0.5% over normal MoRD values due to vesicular nature of slag.
  • Gradation must satisfy MoRD Table 500.4 for bituminous mixes.

Gradation Requirements (per MoRD Table 500.4)

Sieve Size (mm)% Passing (Typical Range)
20100
1490-100
1070-90
4.7540-70
2.3625-55
0.610-30
0.35-15
0.0752-8

Note: Exact values depend on specific mix design and application.


Summary

  • Use steel slags (BOFS, EAFS, ACBFS) for bituminous surface courses.
  • Replace fine aggregates with coarse or mixed slag up to 15-20%.
  • Ensure gradation meets MoRD Table 500.4.
  • Increase bitumen content by 0.5% due to slag's vesicular texture.
Loading diagram...
?What quality control tests are specified to ensure the performance and durability of slag-based pavement materials?

Quality Control Tests for Slag-Based Pavement Materials (IRC:SP:121-2018)

  1. Iron Unsoundness Test (Annexure-I)

    • Applicable if FeO ≥ 3% and Sulphur ≥ 1%.
    • Sample: 2 sets of ≥50 pieces (20-40 mm size).
    • Procedure: Immerse in distilled water for 14 days at room temperature.
    • Acceptance: ≤1% pieces show cracking, disintegration, shaling, or craze cracking.
  2. Volumetric Expansion Ratio Test (Annexure-I)

    • Evaluates expansion potential due to hydration reactions.
    • Limit: Expansion ratio ≤ 2%.
  3. Free Lime Unsoundness

    • For new slag sources or furnace chemistry changes.
    • Petrographic or X-ray diffractometry to detect free lime.
    • If >1 in 20 particles contain free lime, continue weathering until reduced.
  4. Additional Tests as per IS:383-2016

    • Includes particle shape, density, strength, and durability.

Key Notes:

  • Slag aggregates require higher binder content (+0.5%) for bituminous surfacing due to vesicular nature.
  • UCS after 28 days relates to Elastic Modulus for mechanistic design:
    [ E = 1000 \times UCS \quad (MPa) ]

Loading diagram...

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC SP 121. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required