IRC SP 120:2018 is an explanatory handbook supplementing IRC:22-2015, focusing on the design, construction, and performance of steel-concrete composite bridges. It provides detailed guidance on composite construction techniques, including design of shear connectors, stiffeners, and composite girders, as well as durability and fatigue considerations. This standard is essential for engineers involved in the planning, design, and erection of composite bridges to ensure safety, efficiency, and longevity.
Overview
IRC SP 120:2018 is an explanatory handbook supplementing IRC:22-2015, focusing on the design, construction, and performance of steel-concrete composite bridges. It provides detailed guidance on composite construction techniques, including design of shear connectors, stiffeners, and composite girders, as well as durability and fatigue considerations. This standard is essential for engineers involved in the planning, design, and erection of composite bridges to ensure safety, efficiency, and longevity.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Scope of IRC SP 120-2018 (Composite Steel Concrete Structures)
| Clause | Topic | Page |
|---|---|---|
| C.5 | Fatigue Design & Assessment | 26-28 |
| C.6 | Shear Connectors Design | 29-33 |
| C.7 | Composite Columns | 34-41 |
| C.8 | Filler Beam Decks for Bridges | 42-43 |
| C.9 | Precast Slab on Steel Beams | 44-46 |
| Appendix | Moment of Resistances & Material Properties | 47-55 |
[ V_{u} = 0.29 \times f_{u} \times A_{sc} ]
Where:
flowchart TD
A[Composite Steel-Concrete Bridge] --> B[Fatigue Design]
A --> C[Shear Connectors]
A --> D[Composite Columns]
A --> E[Filler Beam Decks]
A --> F[Precast Slabs]
B --> B1[Fatigue Strength Calculation]
C --> C1[Spacing & Strength]
D --> D1[Axial Compression & Bending]
E --> E
IRC SP 120 - Terminology, Definitions & Symbols
While IRC SP 120 does not provide a dedicated clause for Terminology & Definitions explicitly, Clause 2 and C.2.2 cover key terms related to Steel-Concrete Composite Bridge Girders and Limit State Design.
| Symbol | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| ( f_y ) | Yield strength of steel | MPa |
| ( f_{ck} ) | Characteristic compressive strength of concrete | MPa |
| ( A_s ) | Area of steel section | mm² |
| ( A_c ) | Area of concrete section | mm² |
| ( E_s ) | Modulus of elasticity of steel | MPa |
| ( E_c ) | Modulus of elasticity of concrete | MPa |
| ( \phi ) | Shear connector strength factor | - |
| ( P_u ) | Ultimate load | kN |
flowchart LR
A[Steel Section] --> B[Composite Section]
C[Concrete Deck] --> B
B --> D[Shear Connectors]
D --> E[Shear Transfer]
For detailed formulas and tables, refer to the respective chapters (e.g., Chapter 6 for Shear Connectors).
IRC SP 120-2018 — Major Design Provisions Summary
| Chapter | Topic | Key Clauses | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Major Design Provisions | C.5.1 to C.5.5 | 26-28 |
| 6 | Shear Connectors | C.6.0 to C.6.11 | 29-33 |
| 7 | Composite Columns | C.7.0 to C.7.10 | 34-41 |
| 8 | Filler Beam Decks | C.8.0 to C.8.6 | 42-43 |
| 9 | Precast Slab on Steel Beams | C.9.0 to C.9.10 | 44-46 |
| Appendices | Materials, Moments, Examples | I to IV | 47-55 |
Girder Cross Sections (IRC SP 120 - Clause 4.2 & 603.1.4)
| Property | Bare Steel | Composite Short Term | Composite Long Term | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (A) | 34,000 | 48,000 | 41,000 | mm² |
| Neutral Axis Height (y) | 740 | 1,015 | 902 | mm |
| Second Moment of Area (Iz) | 1.22E+10 | 2.01E+10 | 1.68E+10 | mm⁴ |
| Section Modulus Top (Wc) | --- | 2.77E+07 | 2.01E+07 | mm³ |
| Section Modulus Top Flange (Wbf,y) | 1.52E+07 | 3.83E+07 | 2.64E+07 | mm³ |
| Section Modulus Bottom Flange (Wtf,y) | 1.64E+07 | 1.98E+07 | 1.87E+07 | mm³ |
| Section Class | Semi-Compact | Semi-Compact | Semi-Compact | - |
| Location | Element | B (mm) | t (mm) | b/t | Section Class During Construction | After Slab Hardened |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-span | Top Flange | 500 | 20 | 10.3 | Semi-Compact | Plastic |
| Web |
Key Formulas, Tables & Specs for Actions on Bridges (IRC SP 120)
| Material | Grade | Characteristic Strength | Modulus of Elasticity (E) | Modular Ratio (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural Steel | E350 BR | fy = 320-350 N/mm²* | 200 GPa | — |
| Concrete | M40 | fck = 40 MPa | 33 GPa (short term) | 7.5 (short term) |
| 16.5 GPa (long term) | 15.0 (long term) | |||
| Reinforcement Steel | Fe 500 D | fy = 500 N/mm² | 200 GPa | — |
*fy varies with thickness:
[ m = \frac{E_s}{E_c} ]
IRC SP 120 - Global Analysis Key Points
| Effect | Start Time (t) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Composite action | 3 days | Concrete attains 75% strength |
| Autogenous shrinkage | 0 days (pour) | Starts immediately |
| Drying shrinkage | 14 days | After curing |
| Creep | 3 days | After concrete hardening |
| Relative Humidity | 50% | For shrinkage and creep calculations |
| Parameter | Unit | Mid-span | Support | Splice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Force | t | -277.15 | -277.15 | -277.15 |
| Moment | t·m | -167.60 | -153.71 | -129.38 |
| Top slab stress | t/m² | -1030.2 | -841.1 | -961.9 |
| Bottom slab stress | t/m² | -1691.2 | -1536.4 | -1672.6 |
| Top girder stress | t/m² | 4607.7 | 4762.5 | 4626.2 |
| Bottom girder stress | t/m² | -680.1 | -800.1 | -995.3 |
IRC SP 120 - Limit State of Strength (Clause 7.2)
[ \text{Design Load} = \gamma_f \times \text{Characteristic Load} ]
[ \text{Design Strength} = \frac{\text{Characteristic Strength}}{\gamma_m} ]
| Material | (\gamma_m) (Material Factor) | (\gamma_f) (Load Factor) |
|---|---|---|
| Concrete | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Steel | 1.15 | 1.5 |
flowchart LR
A[Characteristic Load] --> B[Apply Load Factor \(\gamma_f\)]
B --> C[Design Load]
D[Characteristic Strength] --> E[Apply Material Factor \(\gamma_m\)]
E --> F[Design Strength]
C --> G[Compare with Design Strength]
F --> G
G --> H{Safe?}
H -->|Yes| I[Design OK]
H -->|No| J[Modify Design]
For detailed formulas and tables, refer to Clause 7.2 of IRC SP 120 and relevant IS codes for materials.
Key Specifications & Formulas for Filler Beam Decks (IRC SP 120, Chapter 8)
Girder Type: Can be simply supported or continuous due to steel flanges taking tensile bending stresses top & bottom.
Beam Type: Rolled or welded beams allowed; skew angle ≤ 30° for uniform stress distribution.
Depth Limits: 250 mm ≤ Depth ≤ 1100 mm (balance deflection & dead load).
Web Spacing: Restricted to ensure uniform load distribution; exact spacing depends on design but must maintain uniformity.
Clear Distance Between Steel Flange Edges: Minimum 150 mm for proper concrete pouring.
Concrete Cover: Minimum cover specified to prevent corrosion and abrasion (typically 25-40 mm depending on exposure).
Surface Preparation: Steel beams must be de-scaled for bonding; no additional shear connectors needed.
Flexural Strength:
[
M_u \leq \phi M_n
]
where (M_n) = nominal moment capacity of composite section.
Deflection Limits:
[
\delta \leq \frac{L}{250} \quad \text{(for live load)}
]
Spacing of Filler Beams:
Maintain web-to-web spacing for uniform load transfer; typical spacing ~ 1.0 to 1.5 m depending on load and girder depth.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Beam Depth | 250 mm to 1100 mm |
| Skew Angle | ≤ 30° |
| Clear Distance Flange Edges | ≥ 150 mm |
| Concrete Cover | 25-40 mm (per exposure) |
| Beam Type | Rolled or Welded |
| Surface Preparation | De-scaled steel surface |
graph LR
A[Filler Beam Deck] --> B[Steel Beams (Rolled/Welded)]
A --> C[Concrete Deck]
B --> D[Steel Flanges (Top & Bottom)]
C --> E[Concrete Cover & Pouring]
B --> F[De-scaled Surface for Bonding]
This ensures composite action without shear connectors, uniform load distribution, and durability.
A) Intermediate Web Stiffener:
B) Load Bearing Stiffener:
| Plate | Width (b) (mm) | Thickness (t) (mm) | (b/t) Actual | Limiting (b/t) | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top flange (Plate-1) | 500 | 20 | 12.20 | 11.84 | Class 3 |
| Bottom flange (Plate-1) | 500 | 20 | - | - | - |
| Bottom flange (Plate-2) | 450 | 20 | - | - | - |
| Web plate | 1700 | 12 | 141.67 | 109.67 | Semi-compact (Class 3) |
IRC SP 120 does not explicitly provide clauses on shear connectors. However, general practice for design and spacing of shear connectors in composite construction (as per IS 11384 and IS 456) can be applied:
Shear strength of one stud:
[
P_u = 0.8 \times A_s \times f_u
]
where,
(A_s) = cross-sectional area of stud,
(f_u) = ultimate tensile strength of stud material.
Spacing limits:
graph LR
A[Steel Beam Flange] --> B[Shear Connector (Stud)]
B --> C[Concrete Slab]
This ensures composite action by transferring shear forces between steel and concrete. For detailed design, refer to IS 11384 or Eurocode 4.
Key Points:
Corrosion Protection:
Touch-up:
Paint System:
Dry Film Thickness (DFT):
| Coat Type | DFT (µm) |
|---|---|
| Primer | 20 - 25 |
| Intermediate coat | 75 - 85 |
| Final coat | ~75 |
Environmental Adaptation:
| Coat Type | Typical Dry Film Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|
| Zinc-based Primer | 20 - 25 |
| Intermediate Coat | 75 - 85 |
| Final Coat | ~75 |
flowchart TD
A[Steel Fabrication] --> B[Apply Zinc-based Primer (20-25µm)]
B --> C[Transportation & Erection (Protect Primer)]
C --> D{Friction Grip Bolts?}
D -- Yes --> E[Leave Bolt Areas Unpainted]
D -- No --> F[Full Painting]
E --> G[Touch-up Minor Scratches]
F --> G
G --> H[Apply Intermediate Coat (Micaceous Iron Oxide, 75-85µm)]
H --> I[Apply Final Coat (Polymer/Acrylic, ~75µm)]
I --> J[Enhanced Corrosion Resistance & Durability]
Note: Proper painting and maintenance significantly extend steel structure life by minimizing corrosion-related thickness loss.
IRC SP 120-2018: Construction and Erection (Clause C.9.7)
This clause provides guidelines to ensure safe and efficient construction and erection of precast slabs on steel beams.
[ P_{support} \geq \text{Max Construction Load} + \text{Safety Factor} ]
| Aspect | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Support | Adequate strength & stability |
| Alignment | Precise positioning of slabs |
| Lifting | Use certified equipment |
| Joint Inspection | Tight and secure |
| Safety Factor | As per design (typically ≥1.5) |
flowchart TD
A[Precast Slab Fabrication] --> B[Transportation]
B --> C[Site Handling & Storage]
C --> D[Positioning & Alignment]
D --> E[Temporary Support Installation]
E --> F[Jointing & Connections]
F --> G[Inspection & Testing]
G --> H[Final Erection Completion]
For detailed design values and procedures, refer to IRC:SP:120 Clauses C.9.4 to C.9.10.
IRC SP 120: Design for Fatigue Limit (Clause 7.3)
[ \sigma_f = \frac{f_{ut}}{N^{m}} ]
Where:
| Number of Cycles (N) | Allowable Stress ((\sigma_f)) as % of (f_{ut}) |
|---|---|
| (10^3) | 90% |
| (10^4) | 80% |
| (10^5) | 70% |
| (10^6) | 60% |
| (>10^7) (Infinite) | 50% |
graph LR
A[Repeated Load Cycles] --> B[Stress Range \(\Delta \sigma\)]
B --> C{Is \(\Delta \sigma\) < Fatigue Limit?}
C -- Yes --> D[Infinite Life Design]
C -- No --> E[Finite Life Design]
E --> F[Calculate \(\sigma_f\) using S-N curve]
F --> G[Apply Safety Factors]
Summary: Design for fatigue limit in IRC SP 120 involves limiting stress ranges based on S-N curves, applying safety factors, and ensuring stress concentrations are minimized to prevent fatigue failure.
IRC SP 120-2018: Materials and Properties (Appendix III)
Appendix III details materials and their properties essential for design:
| Material | Property | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Structural Steel | Yield Strength (f_y) | 250 or 415 MPa |
| Elastic Modulus (E) | 200,000 MPa | |
| Concrete (M25) | Compressive Strength | 25 MPa |
| Elastic Modulus (E_c) | 25,000 MPa approx. | |
| Reinforcement Steel | Yield Strength (f_y) | 415 or 500 MPa |
| Elastic Modulus (E_s) | 200,000 MPa |
flowchart TD
A[Materials] --> B[Structural Steel]
A --> C[Concrete]
A --> D[Reinforcement Steel]
B --> B1[Yield Strength: 250/415 MPa]
B --> B2[Elastic Modulus: 200 GPa]
C --> C1[Compressive Strength: 25 MPa (M25)]
C --> C2[Elastic Modulus: ~25 GPa]
D --> D1[Yield Strength: 415/500 MPa]
D --> D2[Elastic Modulus: 200 GPa]
For precise design values, always consult Appendix
IRC SP 120: Worked-Out Examples - Key Points
The Standard Worked-Out Example is detailed in Appendix IV (Page 55) of IRC:SP:120-2018, illustrating design steps for composite steel-concrete bridges.
Moment of Resistance (Appendix I):
For composite sections,
[
M = \sum F_i \times X_i
]
where (F_i) = force in each component, (X_i) = lever arm from neutral axis.
Plastic Neutral Axis Location (Appendix II):
Position (h) is critical for composite columns; equations (II.1 to II.7 in IRC:22) define (h) based on section type.
Buckling Resistance Moment (C.I.5):
Steel girders during construction resist lateral-torsional buckling per IRC:24.
Material Properties (Appendix III):
Refer to IRC:22 Annexure III for steel, concrete grades, welding, and reinforcement specs.
flowchart TD
A[Start: Bridge Description] --> B[Determine Loads]
B --> C[Select Section & Materials]
C --> D[Calculate Neutral Axis Position]
D --> E[Compute Moment of Resistance]
E --> F[Check Shear & Reinforcement]
F --> G[Design Joints & Connections]
G --> H[Verify Buckling Resistance]
H --> I[Finalize Design & Documentation]
For detailed stepwise calculations, refer Appendix IV of IRC:SP:120-2018.
Frequently Asked
Recommended Shear Connectors for Composite Bridge Construction (IRC SP 120, Clause 6.1):
Types:
Key Requirements:
| Connector Type | Material | Uplift Resistance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stud | High tensile steel | Good | Preferred |
| Channel | Mild steel | Good | Flexible, safe |
| Angle | Mild steel | Moderate | Flexible |
| Tee | Mild steel | Moderate | Flexible |
Loading diagram...
Design Note: Check connector strength and spacing for all limit states under factored load combinations.
Fatigue Design in IRC SP 120 (2018)
IRC SP 120 addresses fatigue design for steel-concrete composite bridges primarily in Clauses C.5.2 to C.5.5:
Key points:
Loading diagram...
This approach ensures the bridge's steel-concrete composite components resist fatigue failure over their design life.
Durability Measures for Protecting Steel Elements from Corrosion (IRC SP 120)
These measures ensure long-term durability and predictable maintenance cycles.
Loading diagram...
Partial Shear Connection in Composite Girders (IRC SP 120)
Partial shear connection occurs when shear connectors between steel beam and concrete slab are fewer than required for full composite action (due to space constraints or economy). This reduces the shear force capacity and thus the moment resistance.
Let:
Degree of shear connection, ( S ) is defined as:
[
S = \frac{n_p}{n_f} = \frac{F_{cp}}{F_{cf}} \quad (0 < S \leq 1)
]
The bending moment capacity ( M ) reduces proportionally with ( S ): [ \frac{M}{M_p} \approx S ] where ( M_p ) = plastic moment resistance for full shear connection.
For design, the reduced moment capacity is considered, and the number of connectors is adjusted accordingly to meet the required moment resistance.
| Parameter | Symbol | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Number of connectors (full) | ( n_f ) | For full composite action |
| Number of connectors (partial) | ( n_p ) | Provided connectors |
| Shear capacity (full) | ( F_{cf} ) | Total capacity with ( n_f ) connectors |
| Shear capacity (partial) | ( F_{cp} ) | Total capacity with ( n_p ) connectors |
| Degree of shear connection | ( S ) = ( n_p / n_f ) | Ratio of actual to full connectors |
| Moment resistance (partial) | ( M ) | Reduced moment capacity |
To ensure composite action between steel and concrete as per IRC SP 120:
| Parameter | Value/Guideline |
|---|---|
| Stud diameter | 19-25 mm |
| Stud height | 75-100 mm |
| Spacing (longitudinal) | 150-300 mm |
| Spacing (transverse) | 150-300 mm |
Loading diagram...
This ensures the steel and concrete act as a monolithic composite beam, improving strength and stiffness.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC SP 120. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required