IRC 59-1976 provides tentative guidelines for designing gap-graded cement concrete mixes specifically for road pavements. It addresses the selection and proportioning of aggregates and cement paste to optimize void filling, workability, and strength, aiming to improve pavement durability and performance. This standard is essential for civil and highway engineers involved in concrete pavement mix design and quality control.
Overview
IRC 59-1976 provides tentative guidelines for designing gap-graded cement concrete mixes specifically for road pavements. It addresses the selection and proportioning of aggregates and cement paste to optimize void filling, workability, and strength, aiming to improve pavement durability and performance. This standard is essential for civil and highway engineers involved in concrete pavement mix design and quality control.
Audience
Contents
Structure
The Introduction of IRC 59 provides key formulas, tables, and specifications for cement concrete mix design for road pavements, emphasizing gap-graded concrete. The design strength S at 28 days is calculated by:
S = s (1 - t.v/100)
where s = minimum specified strength, t = tolerance factor, v = coefficient of variation (Clause 2.4.2).
Table 2 lists tolerance factors t for different tolerance levels and sample sizes.
Mix proportions are based on the optimum void-filling principle (Clause 2.7), with volumes of coarse aggregate, finer aggregate, and cement paste calculated considering entrapped air and extra cement paste for workability. Key formulas include:
Tables 4 and 5 provide approximate values of specific gravity, bulk density, void content, and entrapped air for aggregates.
Water-cement ratio selection is guided by 7-day cement strength and design strength curves (Fig. 1 and 2).
A worked example illustrates the procedure (Appendix).
Sources: Clause 2.4.2, Table 2, Clause 2.6.2, Clause 2.7, Table 4, Table 5, Fig. 1, Fig. 2
Key design stipulations from IRC 59 include the following:
Design Strength of Concrete (S): The average strength to design for is given by the formula S = s (1 + t.v/100), where s is the minimum specified strength, t is a tolerance factor from Table 2, and v is the coefficient of variation (Clause 2.4.2).
Tolerance Factors (t) Table:
| Tolerance level | Fin 10 | 1 in 15 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 40 | 1 in 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples | |||||
| 10 | 1.37 | 1.65 | 1.81 | 2.23 | 2.76 |
| 20 | 1.32 | 1.58 | 1.72 | 2.09 | 2.53 |
| 30 | 1.31 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 2.04 | 2.46 |
| ∞ (infinite) | 1.28 | 1.50 | 1.64 | 1.96 | 2.33 |
Mix Proportioning by Optimum Void-Filling Principle:
Entrapped Air Content (Table 5):
| Max. size of aggregate (mm) | 10 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrapped air (%) | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Volume of air (m³/m³) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Size of aggregate | Specific gravity (g/cm³) | Bulk density (kg/m³) | Void content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse aggregate 63-50 mm | 2.65 | 1650 | 37.7 |
| Coarse aggregate 50-40 mm | 2.65 | 1620 | 38.6 |
| Coarse aggregate 40-20 mm | 2.65 | 1600 | 39.6 |
| Coarse aggregate 20-10 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| Fine aggregate (Zone I & II) | 2.65 | 1450 | 45.3 |
| Fine aggregate (Zone III & IV) | 2.63 | 1350 | 48.7 |
These stipulations ensure concrete mix design meets strength, workability, and durability requirements with quality control accounted for (Clauses 2.4, 2.7, 3.15, and Appendix example).
Sources: Clause 2.4.2, Table 2, Clause 2.7.1, Table 4, Table 5, Clause 3.15, IRC 59 Appendix
Key tests for materials as per IRC 59 Clause 3.15 include:
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Density and Water Absorption: Bulk density of saturated surface-dry samples and water absorption per IS 2386 Part III-1963.
Sieve Analysis: IS 2386 Part I-1963 for particle size distribution.
Aggregate Grading: Prefer single-size coarse aggregate with gap grading principles (Clause 2.3).
Design Strength of Concrete: Average design strength S at 28 days is calculated by
[ S = s \left(1 + \frac{t v}{100} \right) ]
where s = minimum specified strength, t = tolerance factor (from Table 2), v = coefficient of variation (%).
Tolerance Factors (Table 2):
| Tolerance Level | 1 in 10 | 1 in 15 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 40 | 1 in 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Samples | 10 | 1.37 | 1.65 | 1.81 | 2.23 |
| 20 | 1.32 | 1.58 | 1.72 | 2.09 | |
| 30 | 1.31 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 2.04 | |
| ∞ | 1.28 | 1.50 | 1.64 | 1.96 |
| Size of Aggregate | Specific Gravity (g/cm³) | Bulk Density (kg/m³) | Void Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse Aggregate 63-50 mm | 2.65 | 1650 | 37.7 |
| Coarse Aggregate 50-40 mm | 2.65 | 1620 | 38.6 |
| Coarse Aggregate 40-20 mm | 2.65 | 1600 | 39.6 |
| Coarse Aggregate 20-10 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| Coarse Aggregate 10-4.75 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| Fine Aggregate (Coarse Sand Zone I & II) | 2.65 | 1450 | 45.3 |
| Fine Aggregate (Fine Sand Zone III & IV) | 2.63 | 1350 | 48.7 |
These tests and specifications ensure quality control and proper mix design for concrete used in pavements and other structures.
Sources: Clause 3.15, Clause 2.3, Clause 2.4, Table 2, Table 4
For aggregate grading in gap-graded concrete as per IRC 59, the key specification is to eliminate at least two, preferably three, successive sizes of aggregates from the continuous grading range to achieve compatible gradation (Clause 1.2.3). Table 1 provides suggested compatible gradation ranges for coarse and fine aggregates based on the maximum size of coarse aggregate. For example, for a maximum aggregate size of 63 mm, single-size coarse aggregates of 63-50 mm are used with 2 or 3 gaps, and compatible finer aggregates range from 20-10 mm or 10-4.75 mm, with corresponding sand zones (IS: 383) specified. Workability for gap-graded mixes should be low (slump 0-12 mm) to avoid segregation, and compaction must be by vibration only (Clause 1.2.5). Material tests and mix design parameters such as compressive strength, maximum aggregate size, and workability degree are also specified (Clause 2.1 and 2.2).
Sources: Clause 1.2.3, Clause 1.2.5, Clause 2.1, Clause 2.2, Table 1.2
The design strength of concrete in IRC 59 is governed by the equation S = s (1 + t.v/100), where S is the average design strength at 28 days, s is the specified minimum compressive or flexural strength, t is the tolerance factor from Table 2 depending on the tolerance level, and v is the coefficient of variation in percent (Clause 2.4.2). Table 2 provides values of t for different tolerance levels and sample sizes. For example, for a tolerance level of 1 in 15 and coefficient of variation 10%, the design compressive strength for 200 kg/cm² specified strength is 235 kg/cm² (Table 2). The water-cement ratio is selected based on the 7-day compressive strength of cement and desired 28-day concrete strength using curves in Fig. 1 (Clause 2.5). Approximate relationships between compressive and flexural strength are given in Fig. 2. Mix proportions are calculated by the optimum void-filling principle using bulk density, specific gravity, void content of aggregates (Table 4), entrapped air (Table 5), and extra cement paste for workability (Clauses 2.6 and 2.7). A worked example illustrates the full design procedure (Appendix).
Sources: Clause 2.4.2, Table 2, Clause 2.5, Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Table 4, Table 5, Clauses 2.6 and 2.7
The mix proportioning by the Optimum Void-Filling Principle in IRC 59 is based on gap-graded concrete where voids in coarse aggregate are filled by finer aggregate (usually sand), and voids in finer aggregate are filled by cement paste (Clause 2.6.1 and 2.7.1). The key formulas for quantities per 1 m³ of wet concrete are:
Weights per m³ are:
Entrapped air volume and extra cement paste for workability are accounted for (Table 5 shows entrapped air % for max aggregate sizes). Extra cement paste volume v'ₐ is typically about 10-12% of total volume depending on workability and aggregate shape (Clause 2.7.4).
Key tables:
| Max. size of aggregate (mm) | Entrapped air (%) | Volume of air (m³/m³) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3 | 0.03 |
| 20 | 2 | 0.02 |
| 40 | 1 | 0.01 |
| 50 | 0.5 | 0.005 |
| 63 | 0.4 | 0.004 |
| Size of aggregate | Specific gravity (g/cm³) | Bulk density (kg/m³) | Void content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63-50 mm | 2.65 | 1650 | 37.7 |
| 50-40 mm | 2.65 | 1620 | 38.6 |
| 40-20 mm | 2.65 | 1600 | 39.6 |
| 20-10 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| 10-4.75 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| Coarse sand (Zone I & II) | 2.65 | 1450 | 45.3 |
| Fine sand (Zone III & IV) | 2.63 | 1350 | 48.7 |
This method ensures the voids in coarser aggregates are optimally filled by finer aggregates and cement paste, minimizing water demand and improving workability and strength.
For detailed worked example and adjustments for workability, see Clauses 2.7.2 to 4.2.
Sources: Clause 2.6.1, Clause 2.7.1, Clause 2.7.2, Clause 2.7.3, Clause 2.7.4, Table 4, Table 5
Workability and compaction in IRC 59 are governed by the mix design based on the optimum void-filling principle and controlled water-cement ratio. Key points include:
Tables for entrapped air and aggregate properties are:
| Max. size of aggregate (mm) | Entrapped air (%) | Volume of air (m3/m3) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3 | 0.03 |
| 20 | 2 | 0.02 |
| 40 | 1 | 0.01 |
| 50 | 0.5 | 0.005 |
| 63 | 0.4 | 0.004 |
| Size of aggregate | Specific gravity (g/cm3) | Bulk density (kg/m3) | Void content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40-20 mm | 2.65 | 1600 | 39.6 |
| Coarse sand (Zone I & II) | 2.65 | 1450 | 45.3 |
| Fine sand (Zone III & IV) | 2.63 | 1350 | 48.7 |
Adjustments to extra cement paste are made based on observed slump changes (Clause 4.1). The mix design example in the Appendix illustrates these calculations in detail.
This approach ensures adequate compaction and workability while maintaining strength and durability.
Sources: Clause 2.7.2, Clause 2.7.3, Clause 2.7.4, Table 5, Table 4, Clause 2.5, Clause 4.1
The adjustment of mix proportions in IRC 59 is based on the optimum void-filling principle and involves the following key formulas and tables:
Void Content Calculation: [ n = \left(1 - \frac{d}{1000 \times s}\right) \times 100% ] where n = void content (%), d = bulk density (kg/m³), s = specific gravity (g/cm³) (Clause 2.6.2).
Mix Proportioning by Weight per m³ of Wet Concrete:
Entrapped Air Volume: Approximate entrapped air in non-air-entrained concrete varies with max aggregate size (Table 5):
| Max. size (mm) | 10 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrapped air (%) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Volume air (m³/m³) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Extra Cement Paste for Workability: Typically 10-12% of wet concrete volume, adjusted by ±1% depending on aggregate shape and grading gaps (Clause 2.7.4).
Adjustment for Slump Variation: For water-cement ratio 0.40–0.60, each 12 mm increase/decrease in slump changes extra cement paste by ±5% (Clause 4.1).
Design Strength Adjustment: Average design strength ( S = s (1 - t v / 100) ) where s = specified strength, t = tolerance factor from Table 2, v = coefficient of variation (Clause 2.4.2).
Table 4: Approximate Specific Gravity, Bulk Density, and Void Content of Aggregates:
| Size of aggregate | Specific gravity (g/cm³) | Bulk density (kg/m³) | Void content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63-50 mm | 2.65 | 1650 | 37.7 |
| 50-40 mm | 2.65 | 1620 | 38.6 |
| 40-20 mm | 2.65 | 1600 | 39.6 |
| 20-10 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| 10-4.75 mm | 2.65 | 1520 | 42.6 |
| Coarse sand (Zone I & II) | 2.65 | 1450 | 45.3 |
| Fine sand (Zone III & IV) | 2.63 | 1350 | 48.7 |
These principles and tables guide the calculation and adjustment of mix proportions to achieve desired strength and workability in concrete mixes for road pavements.
Sources: Clause 2.6.2, Clause 2.7.2, Clause 2.7.3, Clause 2.7.4, Clause 4.1, Clause 2.4.2, Table 2, Table 4, Table 5
The IRC 59 provides a detailed worked-out example on cement concrete mix design based on the optimum void-filling principle (Clause 4.75). Key formulas for mix proportions per 1 m³ of wet concrete include:
Entrapped air volume (Ve) and extra cement paste volume (Vp) are accounted for, with entrapped air values given in Table 5:
| Max. size of aggregate (mm) | 10 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrapped air (%) | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Volume of air (m³/m³) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Extra cement paste volume (v's) depends on workability; typically about 10-12% of gross volume (Clause 2.7.4). Adjustments are made based on slump variations (Clause 4.1).
A worked example in the Appendix illustrates stepwise calculation of mix proportions, including design strength, water-cement ratio selection, and aggregate quantities. For instance, for 1 m³ wet concrete with 40 mm aggregate, entrapped air 0.01 m³, and extra cement paste 0.10 m³, the volume of coarse aggregate is 0.89 m³, and corresponding weights are calculated using bulk densities.
Mix proportions example:
| Material | Weight (kg/m³) | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Water | 158.85 | 0.5 |
| Cement | 317.7 | 1 |
| Fine Aggregate | 511.0 | 1.608 |
| Coarse Aggregate | 1424.0 | 4.48 |
This approach ensures optimized use of aggregates and cement paste for desired strength and workability (Clauses 2.7.1 to 4.2, Appendix).
Sources: Clause 2.7.2, Clause 2.7.3, Clause 2.7.4, Clause 4.1, Clause 4.2, Table 5, Appendix
The IRC 59 Appendix provides a detailed worked example of cement concrete mix design based on the optimum void-filling principle. Key formulas and tables include:
Design strength calculation: S = s (1 - t.v/100), where s = minimum field strength, t = tolerance factor, v = coefficient of variation (Clause 2.4.2).
Tolerance factors (t) for different tolerance levels and sample sizes are given in Table 2.
Mix proportions by volume for 1 m³ wet concrete:
Entrapped air volume percentages for different max aggregate sizes are in Table 5.
Approximate specific gravity, bulk density, and void content for aggregates are in Table 4.
Example mix proportions per m³ wet concrete and per 50 kg cement bag are calculated using these principles.
These details guide mix design for concrete pavements with specified strength, workability, and quality control (Clauses 2.3 to 4.2, Appendix).
Sources: Clause 2.4.2, Table 2, Clause 2.7.1, Table 4, Table 5, Clause 4.1, Appendix
Frequently Asked
The recommended maximum water-cement ratio for gap-graded concrete mixes is not explicitly stated in the retrieved IRC 59 context. However, it emphasizes that workability should be low to avoid segregation, with a desirable slump of 0-12 mm for gap-graded paving concrete mixes (Clause 1.2.5). This low workability implies a relatively low water-cement ratio to maintain strength and durability. Typically, for gap-graded mixes, the water-cement ratio is kept as low as possible consistent with the required workability and compaction by vibration only, avoiding manual compaction. For precise maximum water-cement ratio values, refer to relevant IS codes or project specifications.
Sources: Clause 1.2.5
Gap grading improves concrete pavement performance by optimizing the aggregate particle size distribution such that the voids between larger coarse aggregates are filled by selected smaller particles without interference or dilation, facilitating better flow and compaction of the concrete mix. As per the guidelines, this results in a concrete mix with low workability (slump 0-12 mm) to minimize segregation and requires vibratory compaction only, enhancing durability and strength. Additionally, gap grading can be more economical by eliminating certain costly aggregate fractions without compromising performance. This principle ensures a dense, well-compacted pavement with improved mechanical interlock and reduced voids, leading to better load distribution and longevity (IRC 59, Clause 1.2.2 and 1.2.5).
Sources: IRC 59, Clause 1.2.2, IRC 59, Clause 1.2.5
For gap grading in aggregates, the compatible size ranges are based on the maximum single-size coarse aggregate size, denoted as D. According to the geometric packing model described, aggregates of size 0.414 D and 0.225 D theoretically fit into the voids of size D aggregates, and size 0.155 D fits into smaller voids. However, practically, aggregates of sizes 0.414 D and 0.225 D do not easily enter the side interstices after packing size D aggregates. Only aggregates of size 0.155 D and smaller can slip into these voids without difficulty. Therefore, gap grading involves eliminating at least two to three successive sizes from the continuous grading range to achieve compatible gradation, typically using sizes D, 0.155 D, and smaller. This approach reduces mortar demand and cement quantity for the same water-cement ratio and workability, as per the guidance in IRC 59.
Sources: IRC 59, Clause 1.2.3, IRC 59, Table 1
The volume of extra cement paste (Vp) required for desired workability in 1 m³ of wet concrete is determined based on the degree of workability needed, compactive effort, and reinforcement amount. As per IRC 59 Clause 2.7.4, for typical Indian concrete pavements with low slump (up to 12 mm), the extra cement paste volume is about 10-12% of the gross concrete volume (V). Specifically, 11% of V is average, adjusted by ±1% depending on aggregate shape (angular or rounded) and grading refinement. For example, angular aggregates may require 12%, rounded 10%, and fewer grading gaps reduce it further to 9-10%. This extra paste volume supplements the cement paste filling the voids in aggregates to achieve the required workability without segregation. Additionally, Clause 4.1 states that for each 12 mm change in slump, the extra cement paste volume is adjusted by 5% of its value (i.e., ±0.005 m³ per 12 mm slump change for 1 m³ concrete).
Sources: Clause 2.7.4, Clause 4.1
The quality control measures for mix design and strength as per IRC 59 include:
The concrete mix must be designed for a higher average strength than the specified minimum to account for quality control variability, using the formula S = s (1 + t.v/100), where s is the minimum specified strength, t is the tolerance factor, and v is the coefficient of variation (Clause 2.4.2).
Table 2 provides tolerance factors (t) for different tolerance levels and sample sizes.
Degree of quality control is classified as 'very good', 'good', or 'fair' with corresponding coefficients of variation and tolerance levels, affecting the average design strength (Clause 2.4.3).
For concrete road pavements, a tolerance level of 1 in 15 and coefficient of variation of 10% is recommended (Clause 2.4.5).
Material tests such as compressive strength of cement at 7 days, specific gravity, water absorption, sieve analysis, and bulk density of aggregates are mandatory (Clause 2.2 and 3.15).
Mix proportions are adjusted based on workability and entrapped air, with iterative testing of strength at different water-cement ratios to finalize the mix (Clauses 2.7, 4.1, 4.2).
This ensures the concrete achieves the required strength with controlled variability and consistent quality.
Sources: Clause 2.4.2, Table 2, Clause 2.4.3, Clause 2.4.5, Clause 2.2, Clause 3.15, Clauses 2.7, Clauses 4.1, Clauses 4.2
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC 59. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required