IRC 36 (2010) provides recommended practices for the construction of earth embankments and subgrades specifically for road works in India. It guides engineers on material selection, soil investigation, embankment design, compaction, and quality control to ensure stable and durable road foundations. This standard is essential for civil engineers, contractors, and planners involved in highway and infrastructure projects requiring earthwork construction.
Overview
IRC 36 (2010) provides recommended practices for the construction of earth embankments and subgrades specifically for road works in India. It guides engineers on material selection, soil investigation, embankment design, compaction, and quality control to ensure stable and durable road foundations. This standard is essential for civil engineers, contractors, and planners involved in highway and infrastructure projects requiring earthwork construction.
Audience
Contents
Structure
The scope of IRC 36 covers specifications for embankment construction and related earthwork for highways. Key parameters include soil classification (IS 1498), sieve sizes (2.00 mm, 425 micron, 75 micron), plasticity index, shrinkage limit, free swelling index, maximum dry density, and optimum moisture content. Compaction and density requirements are critical, as per Clause 8.3.9 and Clause 4.4.6, with Tables 3 and 4 specifying minimum relative compaction and dry unit weights for various embankment and subgrade materials.
Table 3: Compaction Requirements
| SL No. | Type of Work/Material | Relative Compaction (% of Max Dry Density) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Subgrade and earthen shoulders | Not less than 97% |
| 2 | Embankment | Not less than 95% |
| 3 | Expansive Clays (Free swelling index > 50%) a) Subgrade b) Embankment | Not allowed / Not less than 95% |
Table 4: Density Requirements
| St. No. | Type of Work | NHs/SHs/MDRs Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³) | Rural Roads Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Embankments ≤ 3 m height, no flooding | ≥ 15.2 | ≥ 14.4 |
| 2 | Embankments > 3 m height or subject to inundation | ≥ 16.0 | ≥ 15.2 |
| 3 | Subgrade, shoulders, backfill | ≥ 17.5 | ≥ 16.5 |
These ensure suitable material quality and compaction for embankment stability and performance.
Sources: Clause 2.00, Clause 4.4.6, Clause 8.3.9, Table 3, Table 4
In IRC 36, key definitions related to soil compaction and embankment construction are supported by Tables 3 and 4, which specify compaction and density requirements. As per Clause 4.4.6, only materials meeting these criteria shall be used. Table 3 defines the relative compaction percentages of maximum laboratory dry density (IS 2720 Parts 7 or 8) for various works: for subgrade and earthen shoulders, not less than 97%; for embankments, not less than 95%; and for expansive clays in embankments (after treatment), not less than 95%. Table 4 specifies minimum dry unit weights for embankments and subgrade, varying by road type and embankment height, e.g., embankments up to 3 m height require at least 15.2 kN/m³ for NHs/SHs/MDRs and 14.4 kN/m³ for rural roads. These definitions and specifications ensure proper soil compaction and stability in embankment construction.
Sources: Clause 4.4.6, Table 3, Table 4
For selection of materials in IRC 36, key specifications include compaction, density, and soil classification as follows:
Compaction Requirements (Table 3, Clause 4.4.6):
Density Requirements (Table 4, Clause 4.4.6):
| St. No. | Type of Work | NHs/SHs/MDRs Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³) | Rural Roads Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Embankments ≤ 3 m height, no flooding | ≥ 15.2 | ≥ 14.4 |
| 2 | Embankments > 3 m or subject to inundation | ≥ 16.0 | ≥ 15.2 |
| 3 | Subgrade, shoulders, backfill | ≥ 17.5 | ≥ 16.5 |
These criteria ensure material suitability for embankment and subgrade construction per IRC 36 requirements.
Sources: Clause 4.4.6, Table 3, Table 4, Clause 4.3.10, Clause 2.16
Key specifications for Soil Surveys and Investigations per IRC 36 include detailed soil classification and subgrade evaluation as per Clause 2.16. Soils are classified by grain size, plasticity, and organic content with typical group symbols (e.g., ML, CL, CH) and their corresponding unit dry weight and CBR values. For example, inorganic clays of low plasticity (CL) have unit dry weight 1.44-2.08 g/cm³ and CBR ≤ 15%. Highly organic soils like peat (Pt) are unsuitable as subgrade. Laboratory investigations should report sieve analysis, Atterberg limits (liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index), shrinkage limit, free swelling index, maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, soil classification per IS:1498, and CBR values (Clause 2.00 and 2.16). Material selection for subgrades and embankments must be based on these surveys and tests (Clause 3.2). The following table summarizes soil groups and properties:
Sources: Clause 2.16, Clause 2.00, Clause 3.2
Key structural features of embankments per IRC 36 include ensuring the embankment material has a minimum dry density of not less than 16.5 kN/m³ as per Clause 16.5. Lightweight fill materials such as cinder, pond ash, or fly ash are exceptions to Table 4 specifications. The embankment construction involves proper soil surveys, setting out construction limits, preliminary operations, and compaction control to achieve required density and stability. Drainage and allowance for settlement are also critical features to maintain embankment integrity. The embankment should be constructed in layers with adequate compaction and quality control as detailed in the relevant clauses (5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 21).
Sources: Clause 16.5, Clause 5, Clause 8, Clause 18, Clause 19, Clause 20, Clause 21
As per IRC 36 Clause 6.1, setting out construction limits begins with marking the road alignment on the ground using theodolite and total station equipment. The centre-line pegs are established at regular intervals along the road. At horizontal curves, pegs must be placed at the start and end of the curve and at the intersection points of tangents connected by the curve. Clause 6.4 references sketches (Fig. 1) that illustrate the setting out of control pegs for embankment construction, which are essential for defining construction limits precisely. Additionally, Clause 5.3 allows for steeper slopes than standard if mechanically stabilized, ensuring safety within construction limits. These procedures ensure accurate physical demarcation of the designed road alignment and construction boundaries.
Sources: Clause 5.3, Clause 6.1, Clause 6.4
Preliminary Operations in IRC 36 primarily involve setting out construction limits and preparing the site for embankment construction. As per Clause 6.4, sketches for setting out control pegs are provided (Fig. 1) to guide embankment layout. The key steps include soil surveys, investigations, and marking construction boundaries accurately before earthwork begins. These operations ensure proper alignment and dimensions of the embankment as per design. The Table of Contents indicates that detailed procedures and specifications for Preliminary Operations are covered in Section 7 (Page 12) of IRC 36. Unfortunately, specific formulas or detailed tables for Preliminary Operations are not provided in the retrieved context.
Sources: Clause 6.4, Section 7, Page 12
Key specifications for Borrow Pits and Material Handling per IRC 36 include:
Test Pits (Clause 4.3.1): Test pits must be dug in borrow areas with depth not exceeding the likely borrow pit depth by more than 150 mm. Adequate samples should be taken from each borrow area.
Location and Depth (Clause 8.1 & 8.1.4): Borrow pits must be located so they do not cut an imaginary line sloping 1 vertical to 4 horizontal from the edge of the final embankment section (see Fig. 2). This ensures stability and minimal adverse effects.
Material Quality (Clause 8.1): Only approved materials are to be used, with the best materials reserved for the embankment top (subgrade).
River Side Borrow Pits (Clause 10.3): Borrow pits near rivers should have their inner edge at least 15 m from the bank toe, considering flood magnitude and duration, and comply with Clause 8.1.3.
These rules ensure safe, efficient borrow pit design and material handling for embankment construction.
Sources: Clause 4.3.1, Clause 8.1, Clause 8.1.4, Clause 10.3
Key construction procedures for earth embankments and subgrade in IRC 36 include:
Soil Layering and Compaction: Soil is spread in layers and compacted to specified densities (Clause 8.3.8).
Selection of Compaction Equipment: Table 6 guides equipment choice based on soil type:
| SI. No | Type of material | Suitable Compaction Equipment | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rock till (except soft material) | Vibratory roller | |
| 2 | Broken concrete, brick, colliery shale, fly ash | Vibratory roller, Smooth wheeled roller, Pneumatic-tyred roller | Pneumatic-tyred roller for fly ash only |
| 3 | Coarse-Grained soils | Vibratory roller, Pneumatic-tyred roller, Smooth wheeled roller | |
| 4 | Fine-Grained soils | Sheep foot roller, Smooth wheeled roller, Pneumatic-tyred roller, Vibratory roller, Vibro rammer, Power rammer, Plate compactor | Sheep foot roller best for clayey soil |
This ensures proper density and stability of embankments as per IRC 36 standards.
Sources: Clause 8.3.8, Table 6
For construction and maintenance of roads on a flood bank as per IRC 36, key specifications include:
These ensure stability and durability of flood bank roads against flooding and water damage.
Sources: Clause 10, 1.25, Clause 9.4
Key special construction considerations in IRC 36 include mechanical stabilization of slopes steeper than standard (Clause 5.3), and strict compaction and density requirements for embankment and subgrade materials (Clause 4.4.6). The compaction must meet relative compaction percentages per IS 2720, as shown in Table 3, and density requirements per Table 4. For example, embankments up to 3 m height require a minimum dry unit weight of 15.2 kN/m³ for National Highways (NHs), State Highways (SHs), and Major District Roads (MDRs), and 14.4 kN/m³ for rural roads. Embankments over 3 m or subject to inundation require higher densities (16.0 kN/m³ for NHs/SHs/MDRs). Subgrade and earthen shoulders require even higher densities (17.5 kN/m³ for NHs/SHs/MDRs). These ensure stability and durability under special conditions.
Sources: Clause 5.3, Clause 4.4.6, Table 3, Table 4
For the construction of earthen shoulders as per IRC 36, Clause 15 specifies that earthen shoulders shall be constructed using the same material as the subgrade, specifically the top 500 mm portion of the embankment. This material must be compacted to the same density requirements detailed in Tables 3 and 4 of the code. Additionally, the construction of shoulders should be coordinated to progress simultaneously with the construction of the pavement layers (Clause 15.1). For embankments in waterlogged or marshy areas, a coarse sand blanket layer must be provided as per IRC 34 (Clause 14.2). The minimum dry density for subgrade and earthen shoulders is specified as not less than 15.2 kN/m³ (Clause 15.2).
Sources: Clause 14.2, Clause 15.1, Clause 15.2
For flyash embankment construction as per IRC 36, the term 'flyash' includes pond ash, bottom ash, or mound ash, but not fine flyash alone (Clause 16.1). Key requirements include:
Refer to IRC:SP:58 for detailed guidelines on flyash use in road embankments.
Sources: Clause 16.1, Clause 15.1, Clause 16.5
Key specifications for compaction control and testing as per IRC 36 include:
These ensure embankment material suitability and proper compaction for pavement stability.
Sources: Clause 8.3.9, Clause 20.6, Clause 21, Clause 2.00
Quality control and acceptance criteria for embankment and subgrade materials per IRC 36 are governed mainly by compaction and density requirements. As per Clause 4.4.6, only materials meeting these criteria shall be used.
Table 3: Compaction Requirements specify:
Table 4: Density Requirements specify minimum dry unit weights:
| Type of Work | NHs/SHs/MDRs (kN/m³) | Rural Roads (kN/m³) |
|---|---|---|
| Embankments ≤3m height, no flooding | ≥15.2 | ≥14.4 |
| Embankments >3m or flooding prone | ≥16.0 | ≥15.2 |
| Subgrade, shoulders, backfill | ≥17.5 | ≥16.5 |
These ensure adequate strength and stability of road embankments and subgrades.
Sources: Clause 4.4.6, Table 3, Table 4
Frequently Asked
According to IRC 36 Clause 4.4.1, suitable materials for embankments and subgrades include soil, moorum, gravel, reclaimed pavement material, fly ash, pond ash, or mixtures thereof, provided they are free from logs, stumps, roots, rubbish, or any deleterious material. Unsuitable materials for embankment construction are: (a) materials from swamps, marshes, bogs; (b) peat, logs, stumps, perishable materials, or soils classified as OL, OH, or Peat per IS 1498; (c) materials prone to spontaneous combustion; (d) frozen materials; (e) clay with liquid limit >70 and plasticity index >45; (f) materials with salts causing leaching; (g) expansive clays with free swelling index >50%. For subgrade construction, the unsuitable materials are similar but with stricter limits on clay: liquid limit >50 and plasticity index >25, and expansive soils are also unsuitable. These requirements ensure stability and durability of embankments and subgrades.
Sources: Clause 4.4.1
As per IRC 36 Clause 8.3.3 and 8.3.4, soil moisture content must first be checked before excavation. If the soil is drier than required, water should be added either at the borrow pits by flooding or irrigating before excavation, or after spreading loosely on the embankment by sprinkling water using hose lines or water browsers. Clause 8.3.6 further requires that after adjusting moisture (considering evaporation losses), the soil must be uniformly wetted by suitable equipment like graders or rotary mixers. Clods must be broken to a maximum size of 75 mm for general embankment layers and 50 mm for the top 500 mm layer. If mechanical processing is not used, clods should be broken to less than 50 mm at the borrow pit itself.
Sources: Clause 8.3.3, Clause 8.3.4, Clause 8.3.6
The recommended compaction methods for embankment materials per IRC 36 include depositing soil in layers not exceeding 150 mm loose thickness and compacting thoroughly using power rollers or mechanical tampers where heavy equipment is impracticable, as stated in Clause 11.2. The acceptance criteria for compaction are given in Table 3 and Table 4 of Clause 4.4.6. Specifically, embankment materials must achieve a relative compaction of not less than 95% of the maximum laboratory dry density (IS 2720 Parts 7 or 8). For subgrade and earthen shoulders, the relative compaction should be not less than 97%. Expansive clays are not allowed for subgrade and require treatment for embankments with the same 95% compaction requirement. Density requirements (Table 4) specify minimum dry unit weights depending on embankment height and flooding conditions, e.g., for embankments up to 3 m height, not subjected to flooding, a minimum dry unit weight of 15.2 kN/m³ for NHs/SHs/MDRs is required. Density testing frequency is at least one measurement per 1000 m² for embankments, with control based on the mean of 5-10 tests (Clause 22.1).
Sources: Clause 4.4.6, Table 3, Table 4, Clause 11.2, Clause 22.1
IRC 36 addresses embankments on flood banks and river levees by defining them as artificial banks protecting adjacent land from floods (Clause 10.1). These embankments can support roads on top if designed with adequate right of way and ensuring the phreatic line remains within the embankment. Design flood frequency is 25 years for agricultural areas and 50 years for towns and vital installations (Clause 10.2). Embankments may be homogeneous or zoned with impervious cores, with side slopes of 1V:2H or 1V:3H, ensuring slope stability. River sides require erosion protection like rip-rap or gabion toe walls, possibly with geotextiles per IRC:SP:59. For construction, quality control follows standard road embankment practices. Additionally, the rear toe of the bank should have a cover of 0.75 m to 1.25 m over the saturation line sloping 1V in 6H from high flood level, with rear berms if needed (Clause 1.25, Fig. 3).
Sources: Clause 10.1, Clause 10.2, Clause 1.25, Fig. 3
IRC 36 specifies that for embankment construction, pond ash, bottom ash, or mound ash (collectively referred to as flyash in this code) can be used, but very fine flyash alone is not recommended (Clause 16.1). Flyash embankments must be constructed with an appropriate soil cover meeting requirements of Tables 3 and 4. The flyash material should have particle size analysis (wet sieve) and compaction parameters (Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content per IS 2720 Part 8) approved by the Engineer-in-Charge (Clause 16.1). Compaction of flyash shall be done using static, pneumatic, or vibratory rollers as directed, immediately after spreading, with simultaneous compaction of flyash core and earth cover layers. Each layer must achieve at least 95% of the maximum dry density before placing the next layer (Clause 16.4). Earth shoulders, if specified, must be compacted to the same density as the subgrade (Clause 15.1).
Sources: Clause 16.1, Clause 16.4, Clause 15.1
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC 36. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required