IRC 342011AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Recommendations for Road Construction in Areas Affected by Water Logging, Flooding and/or Salts Infestation

IRC 34:2011 provides comprehensive recommendations for designing and constructing roads in areas prone to water logging, flooding, and salt infestation. It addresses challenges related to drainage, embankment protection, and salt-affected soils to ensure durable pavements. This standard is essential for highway engineers, designers, and planners working in flood-prone or saline environments to develop resilient road infrastructure.

13Sections
216Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
2011Edition
Roads and Bridges IRC- Indian road congress Category
Alternative search terms: IRC 34 PDF, IRC 34 pdf free download, IRC 34 free download pdf, IRC34 PDF, IRC-34 PDF, IRC 34 2011 PDF, IRC 34:2011 PDF, IRC 34-2011 PDF, IRC 34 (2011) PDF, IRC 34 2011 edition PDF, IRC 34 edition 2011 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IRC 34:2011 provides comprehensive recommendations for designing and constructing roads in areas prone to water logging, flooding, and salt infestation. It addresses challenges related to drainage, embankment protection, and salt-affected soils to ensure durable pavements. This standard is essential for highway engineers, designers, and planners working in flood-prone or saline environments to develop resilient road infrastructure.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Highway Engineers
  • Geotechnical Engineers
  • Road Construction Contractors
  • Transportation Planners
  • Civil Engineering Consultants
  • Drainage Specialists
  • Government Road Authorities

Key Topics Covered

Drainage design for water logged and flood-prone areas
Capillary cutoff layers and materials
Embankment raising and protection against wave action
Use of geomembranes and drainage composites
Salt infestation effects and mitigation
Subsurface drainage techniques including vertical and fin drains
Design of pavements resistant to flooding
Storm water disposal methods
Phreatic line control in hill roads
Specifications for materials like HDPE geomembranes
Remedial measures for existing roads on low embankments
Guidelines for roads adjacent to rivers, canals, and rail tracks

Table of Contents

1Scope

The scope of IRC 34 covers guidelines and specifications for road construction in water-affected areas, including water logging and flooding. Key standards referenced for materials and testing include:

  • Mass per Unit Area of geotextiles: EN ISO 9864
  • In-plane permeability: EN ISO 12958
  • Apparent Opening Size of geotextiles: EN ISO 12956
  • Tensile Properties of geotextiles: EN ISO 10319
  • Water Permeability by Permittivity: EN ISO 11058
  • Thickness of composite materials: EN ISO 9863

Annex-1 provides equivalences between ISO, ASTM, and IS standards for these tests. For drainage design, IRC SP-42 and IRC SP-50 are recommended references. The code emphasizes site-specific design and specialist consultation for flood-prone embankments (Clause 8.1).

These standards ensure proper selection and testing of geotextiles and drainage composites used as capillary cutoffs and waterproofing layers in road embankments.

Sources: Clause 2.2, Clause 7.2.2.1, Clause 8.1, Annex-1

2Problems Due to Water Logging, Flooding and Salt Infestation

IRC 34 provides detailed recommendations for road construction in areas affected by water logging, flooding, and salt infestation, particularly in subsoil or groundwater. Key points include:

  • Use of suitable capillary cutoffs to prevent upward movement of water and salts (see Clause on Suitable Capillary Cutoffs, p. 22).
  • Construction methods adapted to prolonged flooding conditions (Clause on Recommendations for Flooding, p. 18).
  • Specific remedial measures for salt-affected soils to mitigate detrimental effects on pavement materials (Clause on Detrimental Salts, p. 20).

Unfortunately, the exact formulas or tables are not included in the retrieved context. However, the code emphasizes:

  • Proper drainage design to avoid water logging.
  • Selection of materials resistant to salt damage.
  • Layered construction with protective sub-base and capillary barriers.

For detailed formulas, tables, and specifications, refer to the sections starting at page 18 (Flooding) and page 20 (Salt Infestation) in IRC 34.

Sources: Recommendations for Road Construction in Areas Where in Addition to Water Logging, Flooding for Prolonged Periods is Also Expected, Recommendations for Road Construction in Areas Where in Addition to Water Logging, Detrimental Salts are Present in the Subsoil or Ground Water, Suitable Capillary Cutoffs

3General Recommendations

The IRC 34 code provides general recommendations primarily focused on remedial measures for road construction in water-affected areas. Key points include:

  • Clause 1.2 states remedial measures for various water-related problems are included.
  • Clause 8.1 and Table 8.9 address solutions for road embankments overtopped by high-velocity flood water, emphasizing that combinations of solutions may be adopted per site needs and specialist input is recommended.
  • For drainage design, refer to IRC:SP-42 (Road Drainage) and IRC:SP-50 (Urban Drainage).
  • Annex-1 (Clause 4.5.2.5.1) lists relevant test standards for geotextiles used in road construction, including IS 14294 for apparent opening size and IS 14324 for water permeability.

These guidelines serve as a framework; site-specific design and specialist consultation are essential for effective implementation.

Sources: Clause 1.2, Clause 8.1, Annex-1 (Clause 4.5.2.5.1)

4Drainage Design and Capillary Cutoffs

For drainage design and capillary cutoffs per IRC 34, key specifications and formulas include:

  • Capillary Cutoff Positioning (Clause 4.7.3 & 4.7.4):

    • The cutoff should be placed at least 0.15 m above the ground or standing water level, whichever is higher.
    • It shall not be positioned higher than 0.6 m below the top of the subgrade.
    • When using polyethylene sheet (geomembrane) as cutoff, cover it with a 0.15 m thick granular layer (sand) for drainage and protection.
    • For drainage composite (geomembrane + geonet + geotextile), no additional granular cover is needed as geotextile protects and filters, and geonet provides drainage.
  • Drainage Composite Properties (Clause 7.2.2.1):

    • Geotextile: Apparent Opening Size (EN ISO 12956), Tensile Strength (EN ISO 10319), Permittivity (EN ISO 11058)
    • Drainage Net: Mass per unit area (EN ISO 9864)
    • Composite: Widewidth Tensile Strength MD (EN ISO 10319)
    • Impermeable geomembrane: Polyethylene waterproofing film
  • Embankment Surface (Clause 4.7.3):

    • Should have sufficient camber and crossfall to ensure gravity drainage and prevent ponding.
  • Illustrations (Fig. 4.7):

    • Show cutoff location relative to water table and embankment for effective moisture control.

These ensure effective prevention of capillary moisture rise and proper drainage in embankments.

Sources: Clause 4.7.3, Clause 4.7.4, Clause 7.2.2.1, Fig. 4.7

5Embankment Construction and Protection Measures

Key specifications and formulas for embankment construction and protection per IRC 34 include:

  • Sand Blanket Thickness (Clause 7.1): To intercept capillary action, the sand blanket thickness t (cm) is given by:

    [ t = 2d_1 \times d_2 / (d_1 + d_2) ]

    where d is mean particle diameter (mm), d1 is sieve aperture size through which fraction passes, and d2 is sieve aperture size on which fraction is retained.

  • Wave Action Protection (Clause 5.1.2): Stone pitching of designed thickness over graded filter or geotextile is required to protect embankments from flood wave action.

  • Embankment Height (Clause 4.1): When deep drainage is impractical, embankment height should ensure the subgrade bottom is at least 1.5 m above highest water-table/flood level.

  • Geotextile Testing (Annex-1, Clause 4.5.2.5.1): Relevant IS and international standards for geotextile properties include IS 14294 (apparent opening size), IS 14324 (water permeability), and others for tensile and mass properties.

  • Drainage Design: Refer to IRC:SP-42 and IRC:SP-50 for detailed road and urban drainage guidelines.

These combined measures ensure embankment stability and protection against water-related damage.

Sources: Clause 7.1, Clause 5.1.2, Clause 4.1, Annex-1 (Clause 4.5.2.5.1), Clause 8.1

6Effects of Harmful Salts and Mitigation Measures

According to IRC 34, harmful salts in subgrade soil or groundwater affect road construction mainly through physical and chemical actions (Clause 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2). Sulphates of calcium, magnesium, sodium, and sodium carbonate are critical salts causing damage, especially to cement-based pavements and stabilized soil layers. Safe concentration limits are: sulphates below 0.2% (as SO3) in soil and groundwater, sodium carbonate below 0.2% in soil and 0.02% in groundwater (Clause 6.1). No special measures are needed if these limits are met. For concentrations above these limits, special mitigation measures (beyond Sections 4 and 5) are recommended. Testing methods for salt concentrations follow IS 2720 Part XXIII and Part XXVII. Also, dissolved CO2 or bicarbonates are not harmful if pH > 5 (Clause 6.1).

Sources: Clause 2.3, Clause 2.3.1, Clause 2.3.2, Clause 6.1

7Suitable Capillary Cutoffs

As per Clause 4.7.2 of IRC 34, suitable capillary cutoffs consist of layers of coarse or fine sand and graded gravel. The recommended minimum thicknesses of these granular layers for different subgrade situations are given in Table 4.7.2. For subgrade 0.6 - 1.0 m above the High Flood Level (HFL) with Plasticity Index (PI) > 5, the minimum thickness is 350 mm for fine sand (425 micron to 2 mm), and 150 mm for both coarse sand (2 mm to 4.75 mm) and graded gravel (4.75 mm to 20 mm). For sandy subgrade soil (PI < 5, sand content ≥ 50%), the thickness reduces to 300 mm for fine sand and 100 mm for coarse sand and graded gravel. These thicknesses ensure effective capillary cutoff to prevent moisture rise in pavement layers.

Sources: Clause 4.7.2, Table 4.7.2

8Guidelines and Remedial Measures for Specific Problems

IRC 34 provides guidelines and remedial measures for specific problems related to road construction in water-affected areas, detailed in Clause 8. Key points include:

  • Clause 7.2.3 refers to the use of granular material cutoffs as a remedial measure (see para 4.7.2 for details).
  • Section 8 covers various specific problems with recommended solutions, such as water logging, flooding, and presence of detrimental salts.
  • The document includes tables and recommendations for suitable capillary cutoffs (Page 22) and detailed remedial measures starting from Page 23.

Unfortunately, the exact formulas and detailed tables are not provided in the retrieved context. For precise formulas and specifications, refer directly to Clause 8 and related paragraphs in IRC 34.

This section is essential for addressing water-related subsoil issues and ensuring road durability through appropriate construction techniques and materials.

Sources: Clause 7.2.3, Clause 8, Page 22, Page 23

9Drainage Between Road and Rail Track

For drainage between road and rail track as per IRC 34, Clause 8.7, the key approach is to provide effective drainage to prevent water accumulation affecting pavement and track stability. Clause 8.3 details drainage for roads in cutting, recommending aggregate drains on either side of the road to lower the underground water table, as shown in Fig. 8.3. These include V-shaped edge drains combined with subsurface aggregate drains. The specifications for aggregate drains are given in Table 4.5.2.5 (not reproduced here). Fig. 8.7 illustrates drainage zones A and B between road and rail track, emphasizing proper water flow management. The typical cross-section with drainage composite is shown in Fig. 4.6. The design ensures water is diverted away from both road and rail track foundations to maintain structural integrity and serviceability.

Sources: Clause 8.7, Clause 8.3, Table 4.5.2.5, Fig. 8.3, Fig. 8.7, Fig. 4.6

10Specifications for Materials

Key specifications for materials in IRC 34 include grading requirements for aggregate filter materials and properties for drainage composites. Per Clause 4.5.2.5, the grading of filter materials is classified into Class I, II, and III with percent passing by weight on various sieve sizes as follows:

Sieve DesignationClass IClass IIClass III
53 mm--100
45 mm--97-100
26.5 mm-100-
22.4 mm-95-10050-100
11.2 mm10048-10020-60
5.6 mm92-10028-544-32
2.8 mm83-10020-350-10
1.4 mm59-96-0-5
710 micron35-806-18-
355 micron14-402-9-
180 micron3-15--
90 micron0-50-40-3

For drainage composites (Clause 4.6.2.2 and 7.2.2.1), key properties are:

  • Widewidth Tensile Strength ≥ 3000 N
  • Mass per Unit Area ≥ 710 g/m²
  • In-plane permeability at 100 kPa hydraulic gradient (i=1) ≥ 0.45 to 0.55 l/m·s
  • CBR Puncture Resistance per EN ISO 12236

These properties are measured as per EN ISO standards (e.g., 9864, 10319, 12958).

This drainage method applies to all road types and is preferred where economically feasible.

Sources: Clause 4.5.2.5, Table 4.5.2.5, Clause 4.6.2.2, Clause 7.2.2.1

11Provision of Cement and Asphaltic Concrete Surfacing

As per IRC 34 Clause 5.2, when flood water is expected to pass over the road with heavy traffic and prolonged flooding, a cement concrete surfacing of appropriate thickness should be provided for at least two lanes. This pavement must rest on a 15 cm thick dry lean concrete or cement/lime stabilized soil base. For flexible pavements at water crossings, a 50 mm thick bituminous concrete wearing coat is recommended. When asphaltic concrete surfacing is used, the mix should be dense graded and flood-resistant. Wider paved surfaces are preferred to distribute traffic loads better under flooding conditions.

Sources: Clause 5.2

12Monitoring and Maintenance of Drainage Systems

Key points for Monitoring and Maintenance of Drainage Systems per IRC 34 are:

  • Darcy's Law governs subsurface water flow (Clause 4.5.2.1a).
  • Perform field observations and discharge measurements on completed drainage works to assess performance (Clause 4.5.2.1b).
  • Based on measurements, adjust subsurface drain depth or spacing as needed (Clause 4.5.2.1b).
  • Use solid pipes with open joints or perforated pipes with free draining filter material to ensure effective drainage (Clause 4.5.2.1c).
  • Filter material must prevent soil particle ingress and be more permeable than surrounding soil for stable flow (Clause 4.5.2.1c).
  • For design and maintenance details, refer to IRC:SP-42 (Road Drainage) and IRC:SP-50 (Urban Drainage) as per Clause 8.1.
  • Relevant test methods for geotextiles and drainage composites include:
S. No.ISO DesignationASTM DesignationIS DesignationTest Method Title
1EN ISO 12956ASTM D 4751IS 14294Apparent Opening Size of Geotextile
2EN ISO 11058ASTM D 4491IS 14324Water Permeability by Permittivity
3EN ISO 10319ASTM D 4595-Tensile Properties by Wide-Width Strip
5EN ISO 9864ASTM D 5261-Mass per Unit Area of Geotextiles
7EN ISO 12958ASTM D 4716-Water Flow Capacity in Plane
  • Composite drainage materials should have:
    • Widewidth tensile strength ≥ 3000 N
    • Mass per unit area ≥ 710 g/m²
    • In-plane permeability ≥ 0.45 to 0.55 l/m.s at 100 kPa hydraulic gradient (Clause 4.6.2.2).

This ensures effective monitoring, maintenance, and performance of drainage systems in road embankments and pavements.

Sources: Clause 4.5.2.1, Clause 8.1, Annex-1 (Clause 4.5.2.5.1), Clause 4.6.2.2, Clause 4.5.2

13Annexures and References

Key specifications and references in IRC 34 include standardized test methods and guidelines for road construction in water-affected areas. Annex-1 (Clause 4.5.2.5.1) provides a table linking ISO, ASTM, and IS standards for geotextile testing, such as mass per unit area (EN ISO 9864), water permeability (EN ISO 12958), and apparent opening size (EN ISO 12956). Clause 8.1 references guidelines for drainage design: IRC:SP-42 for road drainage and IRC:SP-50 for urban drainage. The document also notes that official amendments are published in 'Indian Highways'. The preamble outlines the scope and topics covered, including construction methods for water logging, flooding, and salt-affected soils. These references and annexures serve as essential tools for design and testing in water-affected road construction.

Sources: Clause 2.2, Clause 8.1, Annex-1 (Clause 4.5.2.5.1)

Popular Questions About IRC 34

?What types of drainage systems are recommended for flood-prone road areas?

For flood-prone road areas, IRC 34 recommends providing 1.50 to 1.80 m deep drainage channels close to the road bank, connected to natural drainage outfalls, to effectively keep the subgrade bottom above the capillary fringe (Clause 1.50). Alternatively, buried drains such as French or Fin drains at pavement edges can lower the water table. These methods apply to all road types and are preferred where economically feasible. Additionally, combining a drainage blanket with small drains or deep formation drains (as shown in Fig. 4.7.5) helps in capillary cutoff and water table lowering (Clause 4.7.5). These drainage systems ensure effective removal of water during prolonged flooding and water logging conditions.

Sources: Clause 1.50, Clause 4.7.5

?How does IRC 34 address the impact of harmful salts on pavement materials?

IRC 34 addresses the impact of harmful salts on pavement materials primarily by specifying safe concentration limits and recommending protective measures. As per Clause 6.1, no special measures are needed if sulphate concentration in subgrade soil is below 0.2% (as SO3) and sodium carbonate is below 0.2% in soil and 0.02% in groundwater. For concentrations above these limits, special precautions are advised. Clause 2.3.2 highlights that sulphates of calcium, magnesium, or sodium mainly cause chemical damage, especially to cement concrete pavements and stabilized soil-cement bases. To mitigate this, Clause 6.3.1 recommends preventing early contact of groundwater with concrete by applying bituminous coatings (light or thick depending on sulphate levels) and designing dense, low-permeability concrete. Use of sulphate-resistant or pozzolanic cement is also advised. Water-bound macadam is generally unaffected if inert filler is used (Clause 2.3.2.4).

Sources: Clause 6.1, Clause 2.3.2, Clause 6.3.1, Clause 2.3.2.4

?What materials and thicknesses are specified for capillary cutoff layers?

As per IRC 34 Clause 4.7.4 and 4.7.2, suitable capillary cutoff materials include high-density polythene sheets (geomembranes), drainage composites, and granular layers such as fine sand, coarse sand, or graded gravel. When using polythene sheets, a protective granular layer of at least 150 mm thickness (sand or gravel) is recommended to prevent rupture and aid drainage. Drainage composites do not require this granular cover due to their geotextile protection and drainage core. According to Table 4.7.2 (Clause 4.7.2), the minimum thickness of granular layers varies by soil and flood level conditions as follows:

Sr. No.SituationFine Sand (425 micron to 2 mm)Coarse Sand (2 mm to 4.75 mm)Graded Gravel (4.75 mm to 20 mm)
1)Subgrade 0.6 - 1.0 m above HFL (PI > 5)350 mm150 mm150 mm
2)Subgrade 0.6 - 1.0 m above HFL, sandy soil (PI < 5; sand ≥ 50%)300 mm100 mm100 mm

The capillary cutoff layer should be placed at least 0.15 m above the groundwater or standing water level and not more than 0.6 m below the subgrade top (Clause 4.7.3).

Sources: Clause 4.7.4, Clause 4.7.2, Clause 4.7.3, Table 4.7.2

?How should embankments be protected against wave action during floods?

As per IRC 34 Clause 5.1.2, embankments subjected to wave action during floods should be protected by stone pitching of designed thickness placed over a graded filter or geotextile layer. This arrangement prevents erosion caused by wave impact. Additionally, Clause 2.2.1 emphasizes that embankments must be designed to withstand flooding effects, and Clause 2.2.3 advises using good quality granular soil to maintain soil integrity during floods, ensuring the phreatic line remains within the embankment cross-section. Expert geotechnical input is recommended for embankments acting like earthen dams to address seepage and piping risks.

Sources: Clause 5.1.2, Clause 2.2.1, Clause 2.2.3

?What are the recommended practices for disposing storm water in water logged regions?

For disposing storm water in water logged regions, IRC 34 recommends using vertical drains to discharge storm water into underground aquifers when conventional drainage systems are not feasible, as per Clause 4.3. Key features include:

  • Discharge into permeable strata via perforated PVC/polymeric pipes.
  • Pipes are wrapped with geotextile to prevent clogging.
  • Inlet pipes are positioned 750 mm above the bottom of the inlet chamber to avoid debris entry.
  • Debris collects in the inlet chamber, which is cleanable.
  • Storm water inflow is controlled through a removable perforated RCC cover slab.

This method effectively manages storm water by facilitating infiltration into underground layers, reducing surface water logging.

The cross-section of the vertical drain is illustrated in Fig. 4.3 of IRC 34.

Sources: Clause 4.3

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC 34. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required