IRC 106:1990 provides comprehensive guidelines for determining the traffic capacity of urban roads in plain areas across India. It addresses classification of urban roads, capacity-related definitions, level of service (LOS) criteria, and design service volumes to help engineers plan, design, and operate urban road networks effectively. The standard is essential for traffic engineers, urban planners, and highway designers seeking to optimize road capacity and improve traffic flow under Indian urban conditions.
Overview
IRC 106:1990 provides comprehensive guidelines for determining the traffic capacity of urban roads in plain areas across India. It addresses classification of urban roads, capacity-related definitions, level of service (LOS) criteria, and design service volumes to help engineers plan, design, and operate urban road networks effectively. The standard is essential for traffic engineers, urban planners, and highway designers seeking to optimize road capacity and improve traffic flow under Indian urban conditions.
Audience
Contents
Structure
IRC 106: Background - Key Points & Definitions
Urban Road Classification:
Key Capacity-Related Definitions:
Level of Service (LOS):
| Road Type | Spacing (km) CBD / Fringe | Access Control | Parking Restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arterials | <1.5 / >8 | Full/Partial | Restricted |
| Sub-arterials | 0.5 / 3-5 | Moderate | Limited |
| Collector | N/A | Full | Few during peak |
| Local | N/A | Full | Unrestricted |
| LOS | Description | Speed (% Free Flow) | Comfort & Maneuverability |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Free flow | ~90% | Excellent |
| B | Stable flow | ~70% | Good |
| C | Stable |
IRC 106: Scope — Key Points & Definitions
The scope covers urban road classification, capacity, and design criteria for traffic flow and service levels.
| Road Type | Function | Spacing (km) | Access & Restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arterials | Principal through traffic, continuous flow | <1.5 (CBD) to ≥8 (fringe) | Partial/full access, parking/loading restricted |
| Sub-arterials | Lower mobility than arterials | 0.5 (CBD) to 3-5 (fringe) | Similar to arterials but less intense |
| Collector | Collects traffic from local streets | N/A | Full access, few parking restrictions |
| Local Streets | Access to properties, low traffic volumes | N/A | Unrestricted parking and pedestrian movement |
| LOS | Description | Avg. Speed (% Free Flow) | Comfort & Maneuverability |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Free flow, excellent comfort | ~90% | High freedom to maneuver |
| B | Stable flow, slight interaction | ~70% | Reasonable freedom |
| C | Stable but affected by others | ~50% | Requires vigilance |
| D | Near unstable flow | ~40% | Poor comfort, restricted freedom |
| E | At capacity, low uniform speed | ~33% | Maneuvering very difficult |
[ \text{Capacity} = \frac{\text{Number of lanes} \times \text{Base capacity per lane (veh/hr)}}{\text{Adjustment factors}} ]
Adjustment factors include lane width, heavy vehicles, gradient, and access control.
IRC 106: Classification of Urban Roads
Urban roads are classified based on their function and traffic characteristics into the following:
| Road Type | Right of Way (m) | Carriageway Width (m) | Design Speed (km/h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arterial | 30 - 45 | 7.0 - 10.5 | 60 - 80 |
| Sub-Arterial | 24 - 30 | 7.0 - 9.0 | 50 - 60 |
| Collector | 18 - 24 | 5.5 - 7.0 | 40 - 50 |
| Local | 12 - 18 | 3.5 - 5.5 | 30 - 40 |
| Vehicle Type | PCU Factor |
|---|---|
| Car | 1.0 |
| Bus/Truck | 2.5 - 3.0 |
| Two-wheeler | 0.5 |
flowchart LR
A[Arterial Roads] --> B[Sub-Arterial Roads]
B --> C[Collector Roads]
C --> D[Local Roads]
Summary: IRC 106 classifies urban roads into Arterial, Sub-Arterial, Collector, and Local, each with specific right-of-way, carriageway widths, and design speeds. Use PCU factors to convert mixed traffic into equivalent passenger cars for capacity and LOS assessments.
IRC 106: Capacity-Related Definitions & Key Specifications
| LOS | Description | Avg. Speed (% of free flow) | Traffic Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Free flow, high comfort | ~90% | Virtually unaffected by others |
| B | Stable flow, some interaction | ~70% | Reasonable freedom to maneuver |
| C | Stable but noticeable interaction | ~50% | Vigilance needed for maneuvers |
| D | Near unstable flow | ~40% | Severely restricted maneuverability |
| E | At or near capacity | ~33% | Difficult maneuvers, low speeds |
| F | Forced/breakdown flow | <33% | Stop-and-go or breakdown conditions |
graph LR
A[Free Flow (LOS A)] --> B[Stable Flow (LOS B, C)]
B --> C[Near Capacity (LOS D)]
C --> D[At Capacity (LOS E)]
D --> E[Breakdown (LOS F)]
This framework guides urban road planning, lane provision, and traffic management per IRC 106.
Definition:
| LOS | Description | Avg. Speed (% of Free Flow) |
|---|---|---|
| A | Free flow; drivers unaffected by others; excellent comfort | ~90% |
| B | Stable flow; reasonable freedom; some effect of other vehicles | ~70% |
| C | Stable flow; significant driver interaction; noticeable comfort decline | ~50% |
| D | Limit of stable flow; severely restricted maneuvering; poor comfort | ~40% |
| E | Near capacity; low uniform speed; extremely difficult maneuvering | ~33% |
| F | Forced/breakdown flow; stop-and-go conditions | Below capacity |
Fundamental relation:
[ q = k \times v ]
graph LR
A[LOS A] --> B[LOS B]
B --> C[LOS C]
C --> D[LOS D]
D --> E[LOS E]
E --> F[LOS F]
F --> G[Breakdown]
For detailed design volumes and passenger car unit (PCU) factors, refer to Clauses 7 & 8 of IRC 106.
IRC 106: Design Criteria for Urban Roads – Key Points
IRC 106 provides guidelines primarily for urban roads in plain areas. Although the exact clause text is missing, the standard covers:
| Vehicle Type | PCU Factor |
|---|---|
| Car/Jeep | 1.0 |
| Bus/Truck | 2.0 |
| Two-Wheeler | 0.5 |
| Cycle Rickshaw | 0.75 |
[ \text{DSV} = \text{Number of lanes} \times \text{PCU per lane per hour} ]
flowchart LR
A[Urban Road Classification] --> B[Arterial]
A --> C[Sub-Arterial]
A --> D[Collector]
A --> E[Local]
B --> F[Design Speed: 60 km/h]
C --> G[Design Speed: 50 km/h]
D --> H[Design Speed: 40 km/h]
E --> I[Design Speed:
IRC 106: Passenger Car Units (PCU)
The concept of Passenger Car Units (PCU) is crucial for urban road capacity analysis, converting heterogeneous traffic into equivalent passenger car flow.
| Vehicle Type | PCU Value |
|---|---|
| Passenger Car | 1.0 |
| Two-Wheeler | 0.5 |
| Three-Wheeler | 0.75 |
| Bus/Truck | 2.5 - 3.0 |
| Bicycle | 0.3 |
[ \text{Equivalent PCU} = \sum (\text{Number of vehicles of type i} \times \text{PCU}_i) ]
flowchart LR
A[Mixed Traffic Flow] --> B[Convert each vehicle type using PCU factor]
B --> C[Calculate Equivalent PCU]
C --> D[Use for Capacity & LOS Analysis]
This conversion standardizes traffic volume for design and analysis per IRC 106 guidelines.
Key Points:
| Road Type | LOS C (Stable Flow) | LOS D (Limit of Stable Flow) |
|---|---|---|
| Arterial | ~1500 - 1800 | ~1800 - 2100 |
| Sub-Arterial | ~1200 - 1500 | ~1500 - 1800 |
| Collector | ~800 - 1200 | ~1200 - 1500 |
Note: Exact values depend on local conditions, lane width, traffic mix.
| LOS | Description | Avg. Speed (% Free Flow) | Comfort & Maneuverability |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Free flow | ~90% | Excellent |
| B | Stable flow | ~70% | Good |
| C | Stable, some interaction | ~50% | Moderate |
| D | Near unstable flow | ~40% | Poor |
| E | At capacity | ~33% | Very poor |
| F | Breakdown | <33% | Jammed |
flowchart LR
A[Functional Classification]
A --> B[Arterial]
IRC 106: Measures for Improving the Capacity of Urban Roads
Key measures to enhance urban road capacity (Clause 9) include:
| Road Type | Design Service Volume (PCU/hr/lane) |
|---|---|
| Major Arterial | 1800–2200 |
| Minor Arterial | 1500–1800 |
| Collector | 1000–1500 |
| Vehicle Type | PCU Factor |
|---|---|
| Car | 1.0 |
| Bus/Truck | 2.5 |
| Two-wheeler | 0.5 |
flowchart LR
A[Increase Lane Width] --> B[Improved Traffic Flow]
C[Signal Optimization] --> B
D[Access Control] --> B
E[Public Transport Priority] --> B
F[Parking Restrictions] --> B
B --> G[Increased Road Capacity]
These measures combined help achieve higher Level of Service (LOS) and improved urban mobility.
Frequently Asked
Functional Classifications of Urban Roads (IRC 106)
According to IRC 106 (referencing IRC:86-1983), urban roads are hierarchically classified based on their function within the urban network:
Arterial Roads
Sub-Arterial Roads
Collector Roads
Local Roads
Summary Table:
| Road Category | Function | Traffic Volume | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arterial | Major traffic movement | High | High |
| Sub-Arterial | Connect arterial & collector roads | Moderate | Moderate |
| Collector | Collect from local roads | Moderate to Low | Moderate |
| Local | Direct access to properties | Low | Low |
Loading diagram...
This hierarchy ensures efficient traffic distribution and access management in urban areas.
IRC 106 defines Level of Service (LOS) for urban roads as a qualitative measure of traffic operational conditions and user perception, based on factors like speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, comfort, and safety.
LOS Grades: A to F, where:
Urban Road LOS Influences: Traffic heterogeneity, speed limits, intersection frequency, bus stops, parking, roadside activities, pedestrian volumes.
Application: LOS guides capacity standards and design service volumes for urban roads, ensuring traffic operations meet desired comfort and efficiency levels.
| LOS | Description | Avg. Speed (% Free Flow) | User Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Free flow | ~90% | Excellent comfort, freedom to maneuver |
| B | Stable flow | ~70% | Reasonable freedom, slight interaction effects |
| C | Stable, affected flow | ~50% | Noticeable interaction, reduced comfort |
| D | Near unstable flow | ~40% | Poor comfort, restricted maneuvering |
| E | At capacity | ~33% | Difficult maneuvering, low speeds |
Loading diagram...
In essence, IRC 106 uses LOS to balance urban road design between capacity and user comfort, adapting to complex urban traffic conditions.
According to IRC 106, Design Service Volumes (DSV) for urban roads depend on their functional classification and fringe conditions (Clause 8.2, 8.4):
| Road Category | Typical Spacing (km) | Design Service Volume (vehicles/hour) (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| Arterials | 1.5 (CBD) to 8+ (fringe) | Highest volume, designed for principal through traffic |
| Sub-arterials | 0.5 (CBD) to 3-5 (fringe) | Moderate volume, connects arterials and collectors |
| Collector Streets | Varies, local neighborhoods | Lower volume, collects traffic from local streets |
| Local Streets | N/A | Minimal volume, primarily access roads |
Loading diagram...
For exact numeric DSV values, refer to Table 2 of IRC 106 or adjust per local fringe conditions.
According to IRC 106 Clause 9, the following traffic engineering measures can improve the capacity of urban roads:
These measures help maintain or enhance the practical capacity and operating conditions of urban roads.
Passenger Car Units (PCUs) in IRC 106 are used to convert heterogeneous traffic (mix of vehicles like cars, buses, two-wheelers, cycles) into a common unit based on the effect of each vehicle type on traffic flow.
| Vehicle Type | PCU Factor |
|---|---|
| Passenger Car | 1.0 |
| Bus/Truck | 2.5 - 3.0 |
| Two-Wheeler | 0.5 - 0.75 |
| Cycle Rickshaw | 0.75 |
| Cycle | 0.5 |
Loading diagram...
This approach aligns with IRC 106 guidelines for urban traffic evaluation.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC 106. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required