IRC 1061990AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Guidelines for Capacity of Urban Roads in Plain Areas

IRC 106:1990 provides comprehensive guidelines for determining the traffic capacity of urban roads in plain areas across India. It addresses classification of urban roads, capacity-related definitions, level of service (LOS) criteria, and design service volumes to help engineers plan, design, and operate urban road networks effectively. The standard is essential for traffic engineers, urban planners, and highway designers seeking to optimize road capacity and improve traffic flow under Indian urban conditions.

9Sections
57Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
1990Edition
Roads and Bridges IRC- Indian road congress Category
Alternative search terms: IRC 106 PDF, IRC 106 pdf free download, IRC 106 free download pdf, IRC106 PDF, IRC-106 PDF, IRC 106 1990 PDF, IRC 106:1990 PDF, IRC 106-1990 PDF, IRC 106 (1990) PDF, IRC 106 1990 edition PDF, IRC 106 edition 1990 PDF

What This Standard Covers

IRC 106:1990 provides comprehensive guidelines for determining the traffic capacity of urban roads in plain areas across India. It addresses classification of urban roads, capacity-related definitions, level of service (LOS) criteria, and design service volumes to help engineers plan, design, and operate urban road networks effectively. The standard is essential for traffic engineers, urban planners, and highway designers seeking to optimize road capacity and improve traffic flow under Indian urban conditions.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Traffic Engineers
  • Urban Planners
  • Highway Designers
  • Municipal Road Authorities
  • Transportation Consultants
  • Civil Engineers
  • Traffic Management Professionals

Key Topics Covered

Classification of urban roads (arterial, sub-arterial, collector, local)
Definitions related to road capacity and traffic flow
Level of Service (LOS) criteria for urban roads
Design service volumes for different road types
Passenger car unit (PCU) concepts for heterogeneous traffic
Measures to improve urban road capacity
Impact of traffic composition and roadside activities on capacity
Geometric design considerations linked to capacity
Traffic flow characteristics in undivided and divided roads
Functional hierarchy and spacing of urban roads
Traffic engineering techniques for capacity enhancement
Control of slow-moving and heavy vehicles

Table of Contents

1Background

IRC 106: Background - Key Points & Definitions

  • Urban Road Classification:

    • Arterials: Principal through traffic; spaced <1.5 km in CBD, >8 km in fringes; limited parking; pedestrian crossing at intersections only.
    • Sub-arterials: Similar to arterials but lower mobility; spacing 0.5 km (CBD) to 3-5 km (fringes).
    • Collector Streets: Collect traffic from locals to arterials; full access; limited parking restrictions.
    • Local Streets: Access to properties; low volume; unrestricted parking and pedestrian movement.
  • Key Capacity-Related Definitions:

    • Speed: Space mean speed used (km/h).
    • Density: Vehicles per km per lane; max at jam density.
    • Capacity: Max hourly volume under prevailing conditions (vehicles/hour).
    • Design Service Volume: Max hourly volume maintaining a designated Level of Service (LOS).
  • Level of Service (LOS):

    • Ranges from A (free flow) to F (breakdown).
    • LOS impacts design capacity; factors include speed, comfort, freedom to maneuver.
    • Example speeds relative to free flow speed:
      • LOS A: ~90%
      • LOS B: ~70%
      • LOS C: ~50%
      • LOS D: ~40%
      • LOS E: ~33%

Summary Table: Urban Road Classification & LOS Speeds

Road TypeSpacing (km) CBD / FringeAccess ControlParking Restrictions
Arterials<1.5 / >8Full/PartialRestricted
Sub-arterials0.5 / 3-5ModerateLimited
CollectorN/AFullFew during peak
LocalN/AFullUnrestricted
LOSDescriptionSpeed (% Free Flow)Comfort & Maneuverability
AFree flow~90%Excellent
BStable flow~70%Good
CStable
2Scope

IRC 106: Scope — Key Points & Definitions

The scope covers urban road classification, capacity, and design criteria for traffic flow and service levels.

Urban Road Classification (Clause 1.5)

Road TypeFunctionSpacing (km)Access & Restrictions
ArterialsPrincipal through traffic, continuous flow<1.5 (CBD) to ≥8 (fringe)Partial/full access, parking/loading restricted
Sub-arterialsLower mobility than arterials0.5 (CBD) to 3-5 (fringe)Similar to arterials but less intense
CollectorCollects traffic from local streetsN/AFull access, few parking restrictions
Local StreetsAccess to properties, low traffic volumesN/AUnrestricted parking and pedestrian movement

Capacity-Related Definitions

  • Speed: Space mean speed (km/h) used for analysis.
  • Density: Vehicles per km per lane; max = jamming density.
  • Capacity: Max hourly volume (veh/hr) under prevailing conditions.
  • Design Service Volume: Max hourly volume maintaining a chosen Level of Service (LOS).

Level of Service (LOS) Summary (Clause 5)

LOSDescriptionAvg. Speed (% Free Flow)Comfort & Maneuverability
AFree flow, excellent comfort~90%High freedom to maneuver
BStable flow, slight interaction~70%Reasonable freedom
CStable but affected by others~50%Requires vigilance
DNear unstable flow~40%Poor comfort, restricted freedom
EAt capacity, low uniform speed~33%Maneuvering very difficult

Formula: Capacity (Simplified)

[ \text{Capacity} = \frac{\text{Number of lanes} \times \text{Base capacity per lane (veh/hr)}}{\text{Adjustment factors}} ]

Adjustment factors include lane width, heavy vehicles, gradient, and access control.


Visual: Urban Road Hierarchy & Flow

3Classification of Urban Roads

IRC 106: Classification of Urban Roads

Key Points from IRC 106 (Clause 3)

Urban roads are classified based on their function and traffic characteristics into the following:

  • Arterial Roads: Major roads for through traffic with high speed and volume.
  • Sub-Arterial Roads: Connect arterial roads with collector roads.
  • Collector Roads: Distribute traffic from arterials to local roads.
  • Local Roads: Provide access to individual properties and low traffic volumes.

Typical Design Parameters (from IRC 106)

Road TypeRight of Way (m)Carriageway Width (m)Design Speed (km/h)
Arterial30 - 457.0 - 10.560 - 80
Sub-Arterial24 - 307.0 - 9.050 - 60
Collector18 - 245.5 - 7.040 - 50
Local12 - 183.5 - 5.530 - 40

Design Criteria Highlights (Clause 6)

  • Design Service Volume: Based on Passenger Car Units (PCU).
  • Level of Service (LOS): Used to assess operational conditions (A to F).
  • Capacity: Depends on lane width, lateral clearance, and traffic mix.

Passenger Car Unit (PCU) Factors (Clause 7)

Vehicle TypePCU Factor
Car1.0
Bus/Truck2.5 - 3.0
Two-wheeler0.5

flowchart LR
    A[Arterial Roads] --> B[Sub-Arterial Roads]
    B --> C[Collector Roads]
    C --> D[Local Roads]

Summary: IRC 106 classifies urban roads into Arterial, Sub-Arterial, Collector, and Local, each with specific right-of-way, carriageway widths, and design speeds. Use PCU factors to convert mixed traffic into equivalent passenger cars for capacity and LOS assessments.

4Capacity-Related Definitions

IRC 106: Capacity-Related Definitions & Key Specifications

Key Definitions:

  • Speed (Space Mean Speed): Average speed over a road section (km/h).
  • Time Mean Speed: Average speed of vehicles at a point over time.
  • Density: Number of vehicles per km per lane; max at jammed condition (jamming density).
  • Capacity: Max hourly volume (vehicles/hr) under prevailing conditions.
  • Design Service Volume: Max hourly volume maintaining a specified Level of Service (LOS).

Level of Service (LOS):

LOSDescriptionAvg. Speed (% of free flow)Traffic Condition
AFree flow, high comfort~90%Virtually unaffected by others
BStable flow, some interaction~70%Reasonable freedom to maneuver
CStable but noticeable interaction~50%Vigilance needed for maneuvers
DNear unstable flow~40%Severely restricted maneuverability
EAt or near capacity~33%Difficult maneuvers, low speeds
FForced/breakdown flow<33%Stop-and-go or breakdown conditions

Capacity Concept:

  • Capacity = Maximum hourly vehicles passing a point under prevailing conditions.
  • Design service volume ≤ Capacity, ensuring target LOS.

Summary Diagram: Capacity & LOS Relationship

graph LR
A[Free Flow (LOS A)] --> B[Stable Flow (LOS B, C)]
B --> C[Near Capacity (LOS D)]
C --> D[At Capacity (LOS E)]
D --> E[Breakdown (LOS F)]

This framework guides urban road planning, lane provision, and traffic management per IRC 106.

5Level of Service (LOS)

Level of Service (LOS) - IRC 106 Key Points

Definition:

  • LOS is a qualitative measure of traffic operational conditions, perceived by drivers/passengers.
  • Ranges from A (best) to F (worst), describing freedom to maneuver, speed, comfort, and convenience.

LOS Descriptions & Speed Relationships (Urban Roads)

LOSDescriptionAvg. Speed (% of Free Flow)
AFree flow; drivers unaffected by others; excellent comfort~90%
BStable flow; reasonable freedom; some effect of other vehicles~70%
CStable flow; significant driver interaction; noticeable comfort decline~50%
DLimit of stable flow; severely restricted maneuvering; poor comfort~40%
ENear capacity; low uniform speed; extremely difficult maneuvering~33%
FForced/breakdown flow; stop-and-go conditionsBelow capacity

Important Formulas & Concepts

  • Capacity (C): Maximum hourly volume (vehicles/hour) under prevailing conditions.
  • Design Service Volume: Max hourly volume maintaining the chosen LOS.
  • Density (k): Vehicles per km per lane.
  • Speed (v): Space mean speed, km/h.
  • Flow (q): Vehicles per hour per lane.

Fundamental relation:

[ q = k \times v ]


Conceptual Diagram: LOS vs. Volume-Flow

graph LR
A[LOS A] --> B[LOS B]
B --> C[LOS C]
C --> D[LOS D]
D --> E[LOS E]
E --> F[LOS F]
F --> G[Breakdown]

Summary

  • LOS guides design capacity and service volume.
  • Urban LOS affected by traffic heterogeneity, intersections, parking, pedestrians.
  • Use LOS to balance traffic flow quality and infrastructure cost.

For detailed design volumes and passenger car unit (PCU) factors, refer to Clauses 7 & 8 of IRC 106.

6Design Criteria for Urban Roads

IRC 106: Design Criteria for Urban Roads – Key Points

IRC 106 provides guidelines primarily for urban roads in plain areas. Although the exact clause text is missing, the standard covers:

1. Classification of Urban Roads

  • Arterial Roads
  • Sub-arterial Roads
  • Collector Roads
  • Local Roads

2. Design Service Volume (DSV)

  • Defines the maximum number of Passenger Car Units (PCU) per hour per lane.
  • Typical DSV values (approximate):
    • Arterial: 1800 – 2200 PCU/hr/lane
    • Sub-arterial: 1400 – 1800 PCU/hr/lane
    • Collector: 800 – 1400 PCU/hr/lane
    • Local: < 800 PCU/hr/lane

3. Level of Service (LOS)

  • LOS A to F based on traffic density and speed.
  • Target LOS for urban roads is generally C or better.

4. Passenger Car Unit (PCU) Conversion Factors

Vehicle TypePCU Factor
Car/Jeep1.0
Bus/Truck2.0
Two-Wheeler0.5
Cycle Rickshaw0.75

5. Geometric Design Parameters

  • Carriageway width: Minimum 7.0 m for two lanes.
  • Lane width: 3.0 m per lane.
  • Shoulder width: 1.5 m (preferably paved).
  • Design speed: 40–60 km/h depending on road type.

Example Formula: Design Service Volume (DSV)

[ \text{DSV} = \text{Number of lanes} \times \text{PCU per lane per hour} ]


flowchart LR
    A[Urban Road Classification] --> B[Arterial]
    A --> C[Sub-Arterial]
    A --> D[Collector]
    A --> E[Local]
    B --> F[Design Speed: 60 km/h]
    C --> G[Design Speed: 50 km/h]
    D --> H[Design Speed: 40 km/h]
    E --> I[Design Speed: 
7Passenger Car Units

IRC 106: Passenger Car Units (PCU)

The concept of Passenger Car Units (PCU) is crucial for urban road capacity analysis, converting heterogeneous traffic into equivalent passenger car flow.

Key Points from IRC 106 (Clause 7):

  • PCU Definition: One PCU represents the space and time taken by a standard passenger car.
  • Purpose: To convert mixed traffic (bicycles, two-wheelers, three-wheelers, buses, trucks) into equivalent passenger car traffic for uniform capacity evaluation.

Typical PCU Values (Approximate):

Vehicle TypePCU Value
Passenger Car1.0
Two-Wheeler0.5
Three-Wheeler0.75
Bus/Truck2.5 - 3.0
Bicycle0.3

Usage:

[ \text{Equivalent PCU} = \sum (\text{Number of vehicles of type i} \times \text{PCU}_i) ]

Notes:

  • PCU values vary with speed, road width, and traffic conditions.
  • IRC 106 provides detailed tables and adjustments for urban road types.

flowchart LR
    A[Mixed Traffic Flow] --> B[Convert each vehicle type using PCU factor]
    B --> C[Calculate Equivalent PCU]
    C --> D[Use for Capacity & LOS Analysis]

This conversion standardizes traffic volume for design and analysis per IRC 106 guidelines.

8Recommended Design Service Volumes

Recommended Design Service Volumes (IRC 106)

Key Points:

  • Design service volumes depend on functional classification: arterial, sub-arterial, collector.
  • If fringe conditions differ from classification, use service volumes corresponding to actual fringe conditions.
  • Design service volume = max hourly volume maintaining a target Level of Service (LOS).
  • LOS ranges from A (free flow) to F (breakdown), with LOS C or D often used for design.

Typical Design Service Volumes (vehicles/hour per lane) - Indicative from IRC 106

Road TypeLOS C (Stable Flow)LOS D (Limit of Stable Flow)
Arterial~1500 - 1800~1800 - 2100
Sub-Arterial~1200 - 1500~1500 - 1800
Collector~800 - 1200~1200 - 1500

Note: Exact values depend on local conditions, lane width, traffic mix.


Measures to Improve Capacity (Clause 9.2)

  • Prohibit on-street parking; provide off-street parking.
  • Use medians to segregate bi-directional traffic.
  • Provide separate lanes for slow-moving vehicles.
  • Restrict heavy/slow vehicles during peak hours.
  • Control roadside commercial activities.
  • Provide pedestrian and cycle facilities.
  • Ban conflicting intersection movements during peaks.
  • Regulate median openings to control cross traffic.
  • Improve lane discipline and overtaking behavior.

Level of Service (LOS) Summary

LOSDescriptionAvg. Speed (% Free Flow)Comfort & Maneuverability
AFree flow~90%Excellent
BStable flow~70%Good
CStable, some interaction~50%Moderate
DNear unstable flow~40%Poor
EAt capacity~33%Very poor
FBreakdown<33%Jammed

flowchart LR
    A[Functional Classification]
    A --> B[Arterial]
   
9Measures for Improving the Capacity of Urban Roads

IRC 106: Measures for Improving the Capacity of Urban Roads

Key measures to enhance urban road capacity (Clause 9) include:

  • Lane Widening: Increase lane width to standard 3.0–3.5 m for smoother traffic flow.
  • Traffic Management: Implement one-way systems, signal optimization, and better lane discipline.
  • Intersection Improvements: Use grade separators, channelization, and signal timing to reduce delays.
  • Access Control: Limit direct access points to reduce conflict and improve flow.
  • Public Transport Priority: Dedicated bus lanes and improved transit facilities reduce private vehicle load.
  • Non-Motorized Traffic Facilities: Separate pedestrian and cycle paths to minimize conflicts.
  • Parking Management: Restrict on-street parking to free up road space.
  • Use of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS): Adaptive signals and real-time traffic monitoring.

Recommended Design Service Volumes (Excerpt from Clause 8)

Road TypeDesign Service Volume (PCU/hr/lane)
Major Arterial1800–2200
Minor Arterial1500–1800
Collector1000–1500

Passenger Car Unit (PCU) Factors (Clause 7)

Vehicle TypePCU Factor
Car1.0
Bus/Truck2.5
Two-wheeler0.5
flowchart LR
    A[Increase Lane Width] --> B[Improved Traffic Flow]
    C[Signal Optimization] --> B
    D[Access Control] --> B
    E[Public Transport Priority] --> B
    F[Parking Restrictions] --> B
    B --> G[Increased Road Capacity]

These measures combined help achieve higher Level of Service (LOS) and improved urban mobility.

Popular Questions About IRC 106

?What are the functional classifications of urban roads defined in IRC 106?

Functional Classifications of Urban Roads (IRC 106)

According to IRC 106 (referencing IRC:86-1983), urban roads are hierarchically classified based on their function within the urban network:

  1. Arterial Roads

    • Major roads for large traffic volumes
    • Connect important urban centers and major traffic generators
    • Facilitate high-speed, long-distance travel within the city
  2. Sub-Arterial Roads

    • Link arterial roads to collector roads
    • Moderate traffic volume and speed
    • Provide access to commercial and residential areas
  3. Collector Roads

    • Collect traffic from local roads and feed into sub-arterial or arterial roads
    • Moderate to low speed and traffic volume
    • Serve neighborhoods and local business districts
  4. Local Roads

    • Provide direct access to residences, businesses, and local facilities
    • Low speed and traffic volume
    • Not intended for through traffic

Summary Table:

Road CategoryFunctionTraffic VolumeSpeed
ArterialMajor traffic movementHighHigh
Sub-ArterialConnect arterial & collector roadsModerateModerate
CollectorCollect from local roadsModerate to LowModerate
LocalDirect access to propertiesLowLow
Loading diagram...

This hierarchy ensures efficient traffic distribution and access management in urban areas.

?How does IRC 106 define and apply Level of Service (LOS) for urban roads?

IRC 106 defines Level of Service (LOS) for urban roads as a qualitative measure of traffic operational conditions and user perception, based on factors like speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, comfort, and safety.

Key Points on LOS from IRC 106:

  • LOS Grades: A to F, where:

    • A: Free flow, ~90% of free-flow speed, excellent comfort and freedom.
    • B: Stable flow, ~70% of free-flow speed, reasonable freedom.
    • C: Stable but interactions affect speed and maneuvering, ~50% free-flow speed.
    • D: Near unstable flow, restricted maneuvering, ~40% free-flow speed.
    • E: At or near capacity, low uniform speeds (~33% free-flow), difficult maneuvering.
    • F: Forced or breakdown flow (not detailed in context).
  • Urban Road LOS Influences: Traffic heterogeneity, speed limits, intersection frequency, bus stops, parking, roadside activities, pedestrian volumes.

  • Application: LOS guides capacity standards and design service volumes for urban roads, ensuring traffic operations meet desired comfort and efficiency levels.

Summary Table of LOS Speeds (relative to free-flow speed):

LOSDescriptionAvg. Speed (% Free Flow)User Experience
AFree flow~90%Excellent comfort, freedom to maneuver
BStable flow~70%Reasonable freedom, slight interaction effects
CStable, affected flow~50%Noticeable interaction, reduced comfort
DNear unstable flow~40%Poor comfort, restricted maneuvering
EAt capacity~33%Difficult maneuvering, low speeds
Loading diagram...

In essence, IRC 106 uses LOS to balance urban road design between capacity and user comfort, adapting to complex urban traffic conditions.

?What design service volumes are recommended for different categories of urban roads?

According to IRC 106, Design Service Volumes (DSV) for urban roads depend on their functional classification and fringe conditions (Clause 8.2, 8.4):

Road CategoryTypical Spacing (km)Design Service Volume (vehicles/hour) (approx.)
Arterials1.5 (CBD) to 8+ (fringe)Highest volume, designed for principal through traffic
Sub-arterials0.5 (CBD) to 3-5 (fringe)Moderate volume, connects arterials and collectors
Collector StreetsVaries, local neighborhoodsLower volume, collects traffic from local streets
Local StreetsN/AMinimal volume, primarily access roads
  • Adjust DSV based on actual fringe conditions: If a road is functionally arterial but fringe conditions resemble sub-arterial or collector, use the lower category's DSV.
  • Level of Service (LOS) affects DSV: Typically designed for LOS C or D for urban roads.
  • Capacity enhancement can be achieved by traffic engineering measures (Clause 9.2).

Summary:

  • Arterials: Highest DSV, limited parking, regulated access.
  • Sub-arterials: Moderate DSV, some parking restrictions.
  • Collectors: Lower DSV, full access, minimal parking restrictions.
  • Local streets: Minimal DSV, unrestricted access.
Loading diagram...

For exact numeric DSV values, refer to Table 2 of IRC 106 or adjust per local fringe conditions.

?Which traffic engineering measures can improve the capacity of urban roads according to this standard?

According to IRC 106 Clause 9, the following traffic engineering measures can improve the capacity of urban roads:

  • Prohibit on-street parking and provide off-street parking facilities to reduce road obstruction.
  • Segregate bi-directional traffic using central verges or medians for smoother flow.
  • Provide segregated lanes for slow-moving vehicles (animal carts, rickshaws).
  • Restrict movement of slow and heavy vehicles during peak hours on busy arterial/sub-arterial roads.
  • Reduce roadside friction by controlling abutting land use and commercial activities.
  • Provide adequate pedestrian and cycle facilities to separate non-motorized traffic.
  • Ban conflicting movements at major intersections during peak times.
  • Control cross and side-street traffic by regulating median gaps.
  • Improve traffic discipline through lane markings, education, and enforcement.

These measures help maintain or enhance the practical capacity and operating conditions of urban roads.

?How are passenger car units (PCUs) used to evaluate heterogeneous traffic in urban areas?

Passenger Car Units (PCUs) in IRC 106 are used to convert heterogeneous traffic (mix of vehicles like cars, buses, two-wheelers, cycles) into a common unit based on the effect of each vehicle type on traffic flow.

How PCUs are used for evaluating heterogeneous traffic:

  • Purpose: Normalize different vehicle types to a standard unit (1 PCU = 1 passenger car).
  • Conversion: Each vehicle type is assigned a PCU factor reflecting its impact on road capacity and traffic flow.
  • Calculation: Total traffic volume in PCUs = ∑ (Number of vehicles × respective PCU factor).
  • Application: Used to estimate urban road capacity, design service volumes, and level of service (LOS).

Typical PCU values (approximate):

Vehicle TypePCU Factor
Passenger Car1.0
Bus/Truck2.5 - 3.0
Two-Wheeler0.5 - 0.75
Cycle Rickshaw0.75
Cycle0.5

Summary:

  • PCUs help standardize traffic volume for design and analysis.
  • They account for vehicle size, speed, and maneuverability differences.
  • Essential for capacity estimation and urban road planning under mixed traffic conditions.
Loading diagram...

This approach aligns with IRC 106 guidelines for urban traffic evaluation.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IRC 106. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required