MORD 242015AI Search Enabled✦ AI Generated

Do It Yourself Construction of Cement Stabilized Sub Base/Base
2015 Edition

MORD 24 (2015) offers detailed instructions for the self-execution of cement-stabilized sub-base and base layers specifically designed for rural roads in India. It addresses aspects such as selection of materials, mix proportioning, execution procedures, quality assurance, and durability tailored to low-traffic volumes and demanding environmental conditions. This code is vital for engineers and contractors aiming for economical and long-lasting pavement construction utilizing locally sourced materials stabilized with cement.

8Sections
64Clauses Indexed
AI Search Ready
2015Edition
Roads and Bridges IRC- Indian road congress Category
Alternative search terms: guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 pdf free download, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 free download pdf, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 2015 PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015:2015 PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015-2015 PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 (2015) PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 2015 edition PDF, guide-to-cement-stabilized-sub-base-and-base-construction-2015 edition 2015 PDF

What This Standard Covers

MORD 24 (2015) offers detailed instructions for the self-execution of cement-stabilized sub-base and base layers specifically designed for rural roads in India. It addresses aspects such as selection of materials, mix proportioning, execution procedures, quality assurance, and durability tailored to low-traffic volumes and demanding environmental conditions. This code is vital for engineers and contractors aiming for economical and long-lasting pavement construction utilizing locally sourced materials stabilized with cement.

Who Uses This Standard

  • Engineers specializing in rural road design
  • Pavement design professionals
  • Site construction supervisors
  • Quality assurance inspectors
  • Contractors engaged in rural infrastructure projects
  • Laboratories conducting materials testing
  • Governmental road development authorities

Key Topics Covered

Criteria for selecting and grading materials for cement stabilization
Techniques for on-site stabilization mixing
Design parameters for cement-stabilized sub-base and base layers
Quality control procedures during construction
Methods for measuring and regulating moisture content
Identification and control of cracking in stabilized layers
Construction activities including spreading, mixing, compaction, and curing
Durability concerns and prevention of surface degradation
Strategies to mitigate reflective cracking
Cost analysis and rate evaluation
Proper handling and storage of cement stabilizing agents
Utilization of indigenous materials and industrial byproducts for stabilization

Table of Contents

1Overview and Scope

Overview and Scope - Highlights of MORD 24

Objective:

  • Provide guidance for rural road development under the National Rural Roads Development Agency (MoRD).

Coverage:

  • Encompasses material selection, specifications, construction methods, design, quality assurance, and safety measures for stabilized materials in rural roads.

Soil-Cement Base Specifications (Clause 6.2)

  • Minimum 7-day unconfined compressive strength: 3 MPa (laboratory test)
  • Minimum thickness: 100 mm (refer to pavement design catalogue)
  • Soil preparation: Complete pulverization and mixing (Clause 404 MoRD)
  • Clayey soils: May require lime pretreatment prior to cement stabilization

Extract from Pavement Design Catalogue for Cement-Treated Bases

Traffic Category (Cumulative ESAL)Subgrade CBRThickness Range (mm)*
T1 (10,000 - 30,000)5-6 (Fair)100 - 125
T4 (100,000 - 200,000)3-4 (Poor)100 - 125
T7 (600,000 - 1,000,000)7-9 (Good)75 - 140
T9 (1,500,000 - 2,000,000)10-15 (Very Good)75 - 125

*Exact thickness depends on detailed design and subgrade strength.


Pavement Layer Schematic

graph TD
  A[Surface Dressing] --> B[Bituminous Macadam]
  B --> C[Crack Relief Aggregate Layer]
  C --> D[Cement Treated Base]
  D --> E[Cement Treated Subbase]
  E --> F[Subgrade Soil]

References:

  • Clause 6.2, MORD 24
  • IRC:SP:72-2015 Pavement Design Catalogues
  • MoRD Specifications Clause 404
2Choosing the Appropriate Stabilizer

Guidance on Stabilizer Selection (MORD 24, Clause 2.0)

Selection depends primarily on the plasticity index (PI) and particle size distribution (% passing 0.075 mm sieve):

Stabilizing AgentSoil Characteristics>25% Passing 0.075 mm<25% Passing 0.075 mm
PI < 1010 < PI < 20PI > 20
CementYesYes*
Lime-YesYes
Lime-PozzolanaYes-No
  • PI = Plasticity Index, PP = Plasticity Percentage
  • Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) should be ≥ 5, preferably > 10 for economical stabilization.
  • Soils with high plasticity and clay minerals respond better to lime stabilization.
  • Cement requires pretreatment with approximately 2% lime for soils with high plasticity.

Storage and Handling (Clause 7.4)

Storage DurationStrength Reduction in Cement (%)
After 3 months20
After 6 months30
After 1 year40
After 2 years50

Summary:

  • Employ lime for soils with PI > 20.
  • Use cement for soils with low PI and well-graded materials.
  • Apply lime-pozzolana for intermediate soil conditions.
  • Store stabilizers properly to minimize loss of strength.
flowchart TD
    A[Soil Sample] --> B{>25% Passing 0.075 mm?}
    B -- Yes --> C{PI < 10?}
    C -- Yes --> D[Cement or Lime-Pozzolana]
    C -- No --> E{PI between 10 and 20?}
    E -- Yes --> F[Lime or Cement]
    E -- No --> G[Lime]
3Material Specifications and Testing Criteria

Material Requirements and Testing (MORD 24 - Clauses 3.0 & 3.1)

  • Material Quality:

    • The gradation and type of soil or granular material greatly influence pavement behavior.
    • Materials must meet minimum quality standards to reduce risks of carbonation and cracking.
  • Strength Assessment Tests:

    • Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS): Evaluates compressive strength without lateral confinement.
    • California Bearing Ratio (CBR): Measures load-bearing capacity of stabilized materials.

Important Test Equations:

  • Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS): [ UCS = \frac{Load_{max}}{Area} ] Where:

    • (Load_{max}) = Peak failure load (N)
    • (Area) = Cross-sectional area (mm²)
  • California Bearing Ratio (CBR): [ CBR(%) = \frac{Load_{sample}}{Load_{standard}} \times 100 ] Where:

    • (Load_{sample}) = Load on stabilized soil at 2.5 mm penetration
    • (Load_{standard}) = Load on crushed stone at 2.5 mm penetration

Typical Specifications Summary:

ParameterRequirement
GradationWell-graded, free from harmful substances
UCSGenerally exceeds 1.5 MPa after curing
CBRMinimum 80% for base layers
Additive PercentageAs per soil type and test outcomes

flowchart TD
    A[Soil/Granular Material] --> B{Meets Specifications?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Stabilize with Recommended Additive]
    B -- No --> D[Increase Additive Dosage]
    C --> E[Conduct UCS & CBR Tests]
    D --> E
    E --> F{Strength Adequate?}
    F -- Yes --> G[Incorporate in Pavement]
    F -- No --> H[Revise Mix or Material]
4Execution Procedures

Construction Processes (MORD 24 - Clause 4.0 and Table 8)

Critical quality control tests during construction to ensure proper stabilization and compaction:

Test CategoryFrequency & Remarks
Soil Pulverization TestsMinimum 3 tests daily distributed across the work period.
Moisture Content ChecksAs per IS:2720 Part 2; minimum 3 tests daily matching pulverization frequency.
In-situ Density TestsFollowing IS:2720 Part 28; 3 tests daily.
  • Mean density ≥ specified compaction level.
  • Each individual test ≥ 99% of specified compaction. | | Compacted Layer Thickness| Randomly verified during construction. |

Essential Parameters:

  • Compaction Degree: Achieve or exceed specified compaction, typically ≥ 95% Modified Proctor.
  • Moisture Content: Maintain optimum moisture for efficient compaction.
  • Layer Thickness: Adhere to design specifications, generally 150-200 mm per stabilized layer.
flowchart LR
    A[Commence Construction] --> B[Soil Pulverization Tests (≥3/day)]
    B --> C[Check Moisture Content (≥3/day)]
    C --> D[Compact Soil Layer]
    D --> E[Density Tests (≥3/day)]
    E --> F{Compaction ≥ Specified?}
    F -- Yes --> G[Random Thickness Checks]
    F -- No --> H[Rework Layer]
    G --> I[Proceed to Next Layer]
    H --> D
5Cost and Rate Evaluation

Rate Analysis for Cement-Treated Soil Sub-base/Base (MORD 24)

Following Clauses 5.0 and 4.6 of MORD 24 and IRC Standard Data (2014), key aspects include:

Key Information:

  • Item: Cement-Treated Soil Sub-base/Base Course
  • Reference: Serial number 4.6 from MORD Standard Data Book (IRC, 2014)
  • Objective: To determine unit rates incorporating material, labor, and machinery costs.

Typical Components of Cost Analysis:

ComponentDescription
Material CostsCement, soil, water
Labor ExpensesSkilled/unskilled manpower for mixing, spreading, compaction
Equipment ChargesCosts for mixers, compactors, transportation
Overhead & ProfitContractor overheads and profit margins

Unit Rate Formula:

[ Unit Rate = \frac{Total Cost (Materials + Labor + Equipment + Overheads)}{Quantity of Work (e.g., m^3 or m^2)} ]

Illustrative Table:

Item DescriptionQuantityUnitRate (₹)Amount (₹)
Cement (43 Grade)50kg6.5325
Soil (Excavation & Preparation)1150150
Labor (Mixing, Spreading, Compaction)3man-hr100300
Equipment (Mixer, Compactor)1hr200200
Total975

Summary:

  • Refer to Clause 5.0 for methodology.
  • Use Serial No. 4.6 in MORD Standard Data Book for detailed unit rates.
  • Consider all cost factors: materials, labor, machinery, overheads.
  • Adjust rates based on local market conditions.
flowchart LR
    A[Material Costs] --> D[Total Cost Calculation]
6Design Criteria for Cement-Stabilized Layers

Design Parameters for Cement-Stabilized Sub-base and Base (MORD 24)

Material Gradation Standards (Table 5):

IS Sieve Size (mm)% Passing (Sub-base/Base)
53.0100
37.595 - 100
19.045 - 100
9.535 - 100
4.7525 - 100
0.68 - 65
0.35 - 40
0.0750 - 10

Material Properties (Table 4):

PropertyLimit
Liquid Limit (%)Less than 45
Plasticity Index (%)Less than 20
Organic Content (%)Under 2
Total Sulfate Content (%)Maximum 0.2
Water Absorption (Coarse Aggregate)Less than 2%; if higher, conduct soundness test per IS 383
Minimum Cement Content (%)At least 5

Design Recommendations:

  • Use IRC SP-72 (2015) design charts considering subgrade CBR and traffic loads for thickness determination.
  • Cement content must ensure sufficient strength and durability.
  • Gradation should provide a closely graded surface finish with Cu ≥ 5.
  • Fines passing 425 micron must conform to liquid limit and plasticity index requirements.
  • Thickness and gradation are subject to pavement design and approval by the Engineer-in-Charge.

Simplified Design Flow

flowchart TD
    A[Assess Subgrade CBR] --> B[Identify Traffic Category]
    B --> C[Apply IRC SP-72 Design Charts]
    C --> D[Calculate Cement-Stabilized Layer Thickness]
    D --> E[Verify Material Gradation & Properties]
    E --> F[Select Cement Dosage and Mix Design]
    F --> G[Implement Construction and Quality Control]
7Ensuring Construction Quality

Quality Control Measures as per MORD 24 (Clauses 7.0 & 7.3.1.2)

Essential quality control testing during construction for stabilized materials (Table 8):

Test TypeFrequency & Criteria
Soil Pulverization TestingMinimum 3 tests daily distributed throughout the work period.
Moisture Content TestingAccording to IS:2720 Part 2; minimum 3 tests daily spaced over the day.
In-situ Density TestingAs per IS:2720 Part 28; minimum 3 tests daily.
  • Average ≥ specified compaction.
  • Each individual test ≥ (specified compaction - 1%). | | Compacted Layer Thickness| Random verifications during construction. |

Key Points:

  • Achieving the specified degree of compaction is critical for soil stability.
  • Moisture content must be carefully controlled to attain proper compaction.
  • Thickness monitoring ensures uniformity in layer construction.
flowchart TD
    A[Begin Construction] --> B[Conduct Pulverization Tests (3/day)]
    B --> C[Perform Moisture Content Tests (3/day)]
    C --> D[Carry Out In-situ Density Tests (3/day)]
    D --> E{Is Compaction Adequate?}
    E -->|Yes| F[Accept Layer]
    E -->|No| G[Redo Layer]
    F --> H[Random Thickness Check]
    G --> B
8Precautionary Measures for Stabilized Materials

Precautions in Using Stabilized Materials (MORD 24, Clause 8.0):

  • Moisture Regulation: Maintain optimum moisture during mixing and compaction to achieve target strength.
  • Uniform Mixing: Ensure thorough blending of stabilizers (lime, cement, bitumen) with soil.
  • Curing: Provide adequate curing, typically a minimum of 7 days for cement or lime stabilization, to develop strength.
  • Compaction: Attain specified compaction levels (usually 95% Proctor density) to reduce voids and enhance durability.
  • Avoid Contamination: Prevent intrusion of organic matter or salts which can degrade stabilization effectiveness.
  • Temperature Management: For bituminous stabilization, keep temperatures within recommended ranges to avoid premature setting or poor bonding.

Relevant Test Methods and Requirements (Clause 3.0):

PropertyTest MethodTypical Requirement
Moisture ContentIS 2720 Part 2Optimum moisture for compaction
Maximum Dry DensityIS 2720 Part 8As per Proctor test results
Unconfined Compressive StrengthIS 2720 Part 10Minimum 1.5 MPa after 7 days curing
Plasticity IndexIS 2720 Part 5Should be reduced after stabilization
Durability (Wet-Dry Cycles)IS 4332Strength loss less than 20%

Summary:

  • Apply optimum moisture content and ensure uniform mixing.
  • Achieve proper compaction and curing.
  • Conduct strength, moisture, density, and durability testing as per IS standards.
  • Prevent contamination and control temperature during mixing and curing.
flowchart TD
    A[Soil Sampling] --> B[Property Testing]
    B --> C{Is Soil Suitable?}
    C -- Yes --> D[Add Stabilizer]
    D --> E[Uniform Mixing]
    E --> F[Moisture Control]
    F --> G[Compaction]
    G --> H[Curing]
    H --> I[Strength Testing]
    I --> J{Meets Criteria?}
    J -- Yes --> K[Proceed with Construction]
    J -- No --> L[Adjust Mix or Method]

Popular Questions About MORD 24

?Which soil and aggregate types are ideal for cement stabilization according to this code?

Suitable soils include well-graded aggregates with enough fines to fill voids, sandy soils with Plasticity Index (PI) less than 30, and fine-grained soils where over 50% pass the 75 μm sieve, with PI below 20 and Liquid Limit under 40. Subgrade soils should have Liquid Limit below 45, PI under 20, and organic content less than 2%. Total sulfate content must be under 0.2% to avoid sulfate attack. Preferred aggregates are granular and silty cohesive soils; clayey soils are better stabilized with lime. Pulverization degree should exceed 60% for effective mixing. Cement content typically ranges from 2-3% for cement-modified soil (CBR > 25) to 7-10% for soil-cement with compressive strength over 20 kg/cm². Minimum cement content for subgrade stabilization is 2%, which can be lowered to 0.5% with advanced equipment and laboratory confirmation.

?How is the appropriate cement content and moisture level determined for soil stabilization?

Determining correct cement content and moisture involves laboratory and field procedures. Cement-modified soils generally require 2-3% cement to achieve CBR over 25, while soil-cement mixes use 7-10% cement to reach 7-day UCS of at least 20 kg/cm². Moisture content should be near the soil’s optimum moisture content (OMC) from Proctor tests to ensure proper hydration and workability. Too little moisture causes incomplete cement hydration; too much results in weak strength and compaction issues. Laboratory tests such as UCS and CBR guide initial estimates. A preliminary field trial is conducted at least 10 days before main construction to finalize cement dosage, moisture content, and compaction methods, ensuring durability and strength.

?Which quality control tests are mandatory during construction to guarantee durability?

To ensure durability, several quality control tests are required during construction. Before starting, cement and lime purity (per IS:1514) and unconfined compressive strength (IS:4332 Part 5) tests are conducted on samples. During construction, pulverization of soil clods must be tested at least three times daily to ensure adequate breakdown. Moisture content is measured minimum thrice daily as per IS:2720 Part 2, maintaining optimum levels for compaction. In-situ density tests per IS:2720 Part 28 are performed at least three times daily, ensuring average compaction meets or exceeds specifications and no individual test falls more than 1% below the target. Layer thickness is checked randomly during construction. Sampling should cover the site representatively, and mix uniformity is verified visually by trenching for consistent coloration.

?What methods can be employed to reduce or control cracking in cement stabilized layers?

Crack control in cement stabilized layers involves addressing causes such as drying shrinkage, temperature and moisture fluctuations, subgrade restraint, and traffic loads. Key strategies include proper construction practices and curing to reduce shrinkage, applying pre-cracking by multiple passes of a vibratory roller 1-2 days after compaction to induce micro-cracks that relieve stresses, and using stress relief layers such as bituminous surface treatments, geotextile fabrics, or unbound granular layers to minimize reflective cracking. Additionally, controlling cement content to avoid excessive shrinkage and considering additives that modify cement hydration can reduce crack width. Micro-cracks induced by pre-cracking generally heal over time without strength loss, and reflection cracks narrower than 3 mm are typically not harmful.

?Which construction techniques are suggested for remote or low-resource environments?

For rural or resource-constrained areas, MORD 24 recommends the Mix-in-Place Stabilization method due to its simplicity and limited equipment requirements. In this method, stabilizing agents like cement or lime are spread directly over in-situ soil and mixed using adapted agricultural machinery or simple equipment. It is suitable for layer thicknesses up to 200 mm and low traffic volume roads. Essential machinery includes road graders with rippers for loosening, rotavators or similar tools for mixing, grid rollers for breaking large aggregates, water bowsers for moisture control, and compactors (static or vibratory rollers) for compaction. Labor is used for manual spreading, stone removal, and finishing. This approach balances cost, logistics, and durability for constructing rural pavements in challenging settings.

Need Detailed Clause Answers?

Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in MORD 24. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.

Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required