MORD 24 (2015) offers detailed instructions for the self-execution of cement-stabilized sub-base and base layers specifically designed for rural roads in India. It addresses aspects such as selection of materials, mix proportioning, execution procedures, quality assurance, and durability tailored to low-traffic volumes and demanding environmental conditions. This code is vital for engineers and contractors aiming for economical and long-lasting pavement construction utilizing locally sourced materials stabilized with cement.
Overview
MORD 24 (2015) offers detailed instructions for the self-execution of cement-stabilized sub-base and base layers specifically designed for rural roads in India. It addresses aspects such as selection of materials, mix proportioning, execution procedures, quality assurance, and durability tailored to low-traffic volumes and demanding environmental conditions. This code is vital for engineers and contractors aiming for economical and long-lasting pavement construction utilizing locally sourced materials stabilized with cement.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Objective:
Coverage:
| Traffic Category (Cumulative ESAL) | Subgrade CBR | Thickness Range (mm)* |
|---|---|---|
| T1 (10,000 - 30,000) | 5-6 (Fair) | 100 - 125 |
| T4 (100,000 - 200,000) | 3-4 (Poor) | 100 - 125 |
| T7 (600,000 - 1,000,000) | 7-9 (Good) | 75 - 140 |
| T9 (1,500,000 - 2,000,000) | 10-15 (Very Good) | 75 - 125 |
*Exact thickness depends on detailed design and subgrade strength.
graph TD
A[Surface Dressing] --> B[Bituminous Macadam]
B --> C[Crack Relief Aggregate Layer]
C --> D[Cement Treated Base]
D --> E[Cement Treated Subbase]
E --> F[Subgrade Soil]
References:
Guidance on Stabilizer Selection (MORD 24, Clause 2.0)
Selection depends primarily on the plasticity index (PI) and particle size distribution (% passing 0.075 mm sieve):
| Stabilizing Agent | Soil Characteristics | >25% Passing 0.075 mm | <25% Passing 0.075 mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| PI < 10 | 10 < PI < 20 | PI > 20 | |
| Cement | Yes | Yes | * |
| Lime | - | Yes | Yes |
| Lime-Pozzolana | Yes | - | No |
Storage and Handling (Clause 7.4)
| Storage Duration | Strength Reduction in Cement (%) |
|---|---|
| After 3 months | 20 |
| After 6 months | 30 |
| After 1 year | 40 |
| After 2 years | 50 |
Summary:
flowchart TD
A[Soil Sample] --> B{>25% Passing 0.075 mm?}
B -- Yes --> C{PI < 10?}
C -- Yes --> D[Cement or Lime-Pozzolana]
C -- No --> E{PI between 10 and 20?}
E -- Yes --> F[Lime or Cement]
E -- No --> G[Lime]
Material Requirements and Testing (MORD 24 - Clauses 3.0 & 3.1)
Material Quality:
Strength Assessment Tests:
Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS): [ UCS = \frac{Load_{max}}{Area} ] Where:
California Bearing Ratio (CBR): [ CBR(%) = \frac{Load_{sample}}{Load_{standard}} \times 100 ] Where:
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Gradation | Well-graded, free from harmful substances |
| UCS | Generally exceeds 1.5 MPa after curing |
| CBR | Minimum 80% for base layers |
| Additive Percentage | As per soil type and test outcomes |
flowchart TD
A[Soil/Granular Material] --> B{Meets Specifications?}
B -- Yes --> C[Stabilize with Recommended Additive]
B -- No --> D[Increase Additive Dosage]
C --> E[Conduct UCS & CBR Tests]
D --> E
E --> F{Strength Adequate?}
F -- Yes --> G[Incorporate in Pavement]
F -- No --> H[Revise Mix or Material]
Construction Processes (MORD 24 - Clause 4.0 and Table 8)
Critical quality control tests during construction to ensure proper stabilization and compaction:
| Test Category | Frequency & Remarks |
|---|---|
| Soil Pulverization Tests | Minimum 3 tests daily distributed across the work period. |
| Moisture Content Checks | As per IS:2720 Part 2; minimum 3 tests daily matching pulverization frequency. |
| In-situ Density Tests | Following IS:2720 Part 28; 3 tests daily. |
flowchart LR
A[Commence Construction] --> B[Soil Pulverization Tests (≥3/day)]
B --> C[Check Moisture Content (≥3/day)]
C --> D[Compact Soil Layer]
D --> E[Density Tests (≥3/day)]
E --> F{Compaction ≥ Specified?}
F -- Yes --> G[Random Thickness Checks]
F -- No --> H[Rework Layer]
G --> I[Proceed to Next Layer]
H --> D
Rate Analysis for Cement-Treated Soil Sub-base/Base (MORD 24)
Following Clauses 5.0 and 4.6 of MORD 24 and IRC Standard Data (2014), key aspects include:
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Material Costs | Cement, soil, water |
| Labor Expenses | Skilled/unskilled manpower for mixing, spreading, compaction |
| Equipment Charges | Costs for mixers, compactors, transportation |
| Overhead & Profit | Contractor overheads and profit margins |
[ Unit Rate = \frac{Total Cost (Materials + Labor + Equipment + Overheads)}{Quantity of Work (e.g., m^3 or m^2)} ]
| Item Description | Quantity | Unit | Rate (₹) | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement (43 Grade) | 50 | kg | 6.5 | 325 |
| Soil (Excavation & Preparation) | 1 | m³ | 150 | 150 |
| Labor (Mixing, Spreading, Compaction) | 3 | man-hr | 100 | 300 |
| Equipment (Mixer, Compactor) | 1 | hr | 200 | 200 |
| Total | 975 |
flowchart LR
A[Material Costs] --> D[Total Cost Calculation]
Design Parameters for Cement-Stabilized Sub-base and Base (MORD 24)
| IS Sieve Size (mm) | % Passing (Sub-base/Base) |
|---|---|
| 53.0 | 100 |
| 37.5 | 95 - 100 |
| 19.0 | 45 - 100 |
| 9.5 | 35 - 100 |
| 4.75 | 25 - 100 |
| 0.6 | 8 - 65 |
| 0.3 | 5 - 40 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 10 |
| Property | Limit |
|---|---|
| Liquid Limit (%) | Less than 45 |
| Plasticity Index (%) | Less than 20 |
| Organic Content (%) | Under 2 |
| Total Sulfate Content (%) | Maximum 0.2 |
| Water Absorption (Coarse Aggregate) | Less than 2%; if higher, conduct soundness test per IS 383 |
| Minimum Cement Content (%) | At least 5 |
flowchart TD
A[Assess Subgrade CBR] --> B[Identify Traffic Category]
B --> C[Apply IRC SP-72 Design Charts]
C --> D[Calculate Cement-Stabilized Layer Thickness]
D --> E[Verify Material Gradation & Properties]
E --> F[Select Cement Dosage and Mix Design]
F --> G[Implement Construction and Quality Control]
Quality Control Measures as per MORD 24 (Clauses 7.0 & 7.3.1.2)
Essential quality control testing during construction for stabilized materials (Table 8):
| Test Type | Frequency & Criteria |
|---|---|
| Soil Pulverization Testing | Minimum 3 tests daily distributed throughout the work period. |
| Moisture Content Testing | According to IS:2720 Part 2; minimum 3 tests daily spaced over the day. |
| In-situ Density Testing | As per IS:2720 Part 28; minimum 3 tests daily. |
Key Points:
flowchart TD
A[Begin Construction] --> B[Conduct Pulverization Tests (3/day)]
B --> C[Perform Moisture Content Tests (3/day)]
C --> D[Carry Out In-situ Density Tests (3/day)]
D --> E{Is Compaction Adequate?}
E -->|Yes| F[Accept Layer]
E -->|No| G[Redo Layer]
F --> H[Random Thickness Check]
G --> B
Precautions in Using Stabilized Materials (MORD 24, Clause 8.0):
Relevant Test Methods and Requirements (Clause 3.0):
| Property | Test Method | Typical Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture Content | IS 2720 Part 2 | Optimum moisture for compaction |
| Maximum Dry Density | IS 2720 Part 8 | As per Proctor test results |
| Unconfined Compressive Strength | IS 2720 Part 10 | Minimum 1.5 MPa after 7 days curing |
| Plasticity Index | IS 2720 Part 5 | Should be reduced after stabilization |
| Durability (Wet-Dry Cycles) | IS 4332 | Strength loss less than 20% |
Summary:
flowchart TD
A[Soil Sampling] --> B[Property Testing]
B --> C{Is Soil Suitable?}
C -- Yes --> D[Add Stabilizer]
D --> E[Uniform Mixing]
E --> F[Moisture Control]
F --> G[Compaction]
G --> H[Curing]
H --> I[Strength Testing]
I --> J{Meets Criteria?}
J -- Yes --> K[Proceed with Construction]
J -- No --> L[Adjust Mix or Method]
Frequently Asked
Suitable soils include well-graded aggregates with enough fines to fill voids, sandy soils with Plasticity Index (PI) less than 30, and fine-grained soils where over 50% pass the 75 μm sieve, with PI below 20 and Liquid Limit under 40. Subgrade soils should have Liquid Limit below 45, PI under 20, and organic content less than 2%. Total sulfate content must be under 0.2% to avoid sulfate attack. Preferred aggregates are granular and silty cohesive soils; clayey soils are better stabilized with lime. Pulverization degree should exceed 60% for effective mixing. Cement content typically ranges from 2-3% for cement-modified soil (CBR > 25) to 7-10% for soil-cement with compressive strength over 20 kg/cm². Minimum cement content for subgrade stabilization is 2%, which can be lowered to 0.5% with advanced equipment and laboratory confirmation.
Determining correct cement content and moisture involves laboratory and field procedures. Cement-modified soils generally require 2-3% cement to achieve CBR over 25, while soil-cement mixes use 7-10% cement to reach 7-day UCS of at least 20 kg/cm². Moisture content should be near the soil’s optimum moisture content (OMC) from Proctor tests to ensure proper hydration and workability. Too little moisture causes incomplete cement hydration; too much results in weak strength and compaction issues. Laboratory tests such as UCS and CBR guide initial estimates. A preliminary field trial is conducted at least 10 days before main construction to finalize cement dosage, moisture content, and compaction methods, ensuring durability and strength.
To ensure durability, several quality control tests are required during construction. Before starting, cement and lime purity (per IS:1514) and unconfined compressive strength (IS:4332 Part 5) tests are conducted on samples. During construction, pulverization of soil clods must be tested at least three times daily to ensure adequate breakdown. Moisture content is measured minimum thrice daily as per IS:2720 Part 2, maintaining optimum levels for compaction. In-situ density tests per IS:2720 Part 28 are performed at least three times daily, ensuring average compaction meets or exceeds specifications and no individual test falls more than 1% below the target. Layer thickness is checked randomly during construction. Sampling should cover the site representatively, and mix uniformity is verified visually by trenching for consistent coloration.
Crack control in cement stabilized layers involves addressing causes such as drying shrinkage, temperature and moisture fluctuations, subgrade restraint, and traffic loads. Key strategies include proper construction practices and curing to reduce shrinkage, applying pre-cracking by multiple passes of a vibratory roller 1-2 days after compaction to induce micro-cracks that relieve stresses, and using stress relief layers such as bituminous surface treatments, geotextile fabrics, or unbound granular layers to minimize reflective cracking. Additionally, controlling cement content to avoid excessive shrinkage and considering additives that modify cement hydration can reduce crack width. Micro-cracks induced by pre-cracking generally heal over time without strength loss, and reflection cracks narrower than 3 mm are typically not harmful.
For rural or resource-constrained areas, MORD 24 recommends the Mix-in-Place Stabilization method due to its simplicity and limited equipment requirements. In this method, stabilizing agents like cement or lime are spread directly over in-situ soil and mixed using adapted agricultural machinery or simple equipment. It is suitable for layer thicknesses up to 200 mm and low traffic volume roads. Essential machinery includes road graders with rippers for loosening, rotavators or similar tools for mixing, grid rollers for breaking large aggregates, water bowsers for moisture control, and compactors (static or vibratory rollers) for compaction. Labor is used for manual spreading, stone removal, and finishing. This approach balances cost, logistics, and durability for constructing rural pavements in challenging settings.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in MORD 24. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required