MORD 26:2015 outlines detailed procedures for designing, sourcing materials, and constructing Do It Yourself (DIY) Cell Filled Concrete Pavements, tailored mainly for low-traffic rural roads in India. This guideline emphasizes the use of plastic cellular formworks filled with concrete to form interlocking blocks, eliminating joints and optimizing aggregate usage. It serves as a valuable reference for engineers and contractors aiming for economical, resilient pavement structures using accessible resources and straightforward construction practices.
Overview
MORD 26:2015 outlines detailed procedures for designing, sourcing materials, and constructing Do It Yourself (DIY) Cell Filled Concrete Pavements, tailored mainly for low-traffic rural roads in India. This guideline emphasizes the use of plastic cellular formworks filled with concrete to form interlocking blocks, eliminating joints and optimizing aggregate usage. It serves as a valuable reference for engineers and contractors aiming for economical, resilient pavement structures using accessible resources and straightforward construction practices.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Introduction to Cell Filled Concrete Pavements (MORD 26)
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
Subgrade Preparation:
Construction Aids:
Refer to IRC:44-2008 for mix design details.
flowchart TD
A[Plastic Cells] --> B[Concrete Filling]
B --> C[Enhanced Pavement Strength]
A --> D[Secured by Iron Spikes & Nylon Threads]
E[Prepared Subgrade] --> F[Compaction to 100% MDD]
F --> B
This introduction sets the stage for understanding and executing cell filled concrete pavements per MORD 26.
Core Principle: Plastic modular cells are placed over a well-prepared subbase to create a cellular matrix. Concrete fills each cell, forming small interlocked blocks that distribute loads effectively, minimize cracking, and improve durability—particularly suited for low-traffic rural roads.
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19.00 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
flowchart TD
A[Subgrade & Subbase Preparation] --> B[Placement of Plastic Cells]
B --> C[Secure Cells with Iron Spikes]
C --> D[Concrete Filling (~120 mm Depth)]
D --> E[Concrete Compaction (Roller/Vibration)]
E --> F[Remove Spikes & Cure Surface]
F --> G[Install Edge Protection & Hard Shoulders]
G --> H[Open Pavement to Traffic After Curing]
This section explains the primary concept behind the cell filled concrete pavement system.
Details of Plastic Cells for Concrete Pavements (MORD 26)
graph TD
A[Plastic Cell Plan] --> B[Side Length 150-200 mm]
A --> C[Depth 100 mm]
A --> D[Welded Strips at 300 mm Intervals]
A --> E[Iron Spikes 200 mm Long]
A --> F[Nylon Threads for Support]
This system guarantees modular, stable formwork for effective concrete pavement construction with controlled thickness and longevity.
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
[ \text{Dry Density} = \frac{\text{Wet Density}}{1 + w} ]
where (w) is moisture content expressed as a decimal.
flowchart TD
A[Subgrade Soil] --> B[First Layer Compacted]
B --> C[Second Layer Compacted]
C --> D[CBR Testing]
This ensures a stable foundation for the pavement structure.
Subbase Requirements and Preparation (MORD 26)
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Subbase Thickness | 150 mm (cementitious for heavy traffic) |
| Minimum 7-day Strength | 1.5 MPa (cementitious subbase) |
| Soaked CBR (stabilized) | At least 20 |
| Edge Block Projection | 50 to 100 mm above subgrade/subbase |
| Subgrade Compaction | ≥ 100% MDD (≥ 95% for black cotton soil) |
| Subgrade CBR | Greater than 5 (borrow soil if needed) |
flowchart TD
A[Prepare Subgrade] --> B[Compaction to ≥ 100% MDD]
B --> C[Use Borrow Soil if Required]
C --> D[CBR Testing ≥ 5]
D --> E[Construct Subbase Layer]
This approach guarantees a robust base for pavement longevity.
Coarse Aggregates:
Fine Aggregates:
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
flowchart TD
A[Select Aggregates] --> B[Coarse Aggregate: Impact < 30, Max 26.5 mm]
A --> C[Fine Aggregate: Clean Sand or Crushed Stone]
B & C --> D[Aggregate Gradation per Table 1]
D --> E[Concrete Mix Design]
These specifications ensure strong and durable concrete suitable for rural pavement applications.
Coarse Aggregate:
Fine Aggregate:
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.5 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.5 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
flowchart TD
A[Select Suitable Aggregates] --> B[Check Impact Value & Flakiness]
B --> C[Verify Gradation per Table 1]
C --> D[Proportion Cement, Sand, Aggregates by Weight]
D --> E[Adjust Water Content]
E --> F[Conduct Trial Mixes and Strength Tests]
F --> G[Finalize Mix Design]
This method guarantees durable and workable concrete for cell filled pavements.
Joint Design Parameters (Clause 9, Page 9, MORD 26):
Spacing: Joints spaced regularly (typically 3 to 4.5 meters) to manage cracking.
Types:
Details:
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
flowchart LR
A[Concrete Pavement] --> B[Joints]
B --> C[Contraction Joints]
B --> D[Expansion Joints]
B --> E[Construction Joints]
C --> F[Control Shrinkage]
D --> G[Allow Thermal Movement]
E --> H[Work Break Points]
B --> I[Reinforcement: Welded Strips @ 300 mm]
B --> J[Joint Sealants]
This ensures joints effectively control cracking and maintain pavement durability.
Quality Assurance in Concrete Pavement (MORD 26)
Destructive Tests:
Non-Destructive Tests:
flowchart LR
A[Concrete Pavement] --> B[Quality Control]
B --> C[Destructive Testing]
B --> D[Non-Destructive Testing]
D --> E[Visual Inspection]
D --> F[Benkel Beam Deflection]
F --> G[Measure at 0.9 m (Main Roads)]
F --> H[Measure at 0.6 m (Other Roads)]
F --> I[Every 100 m]
Refer to MORD 26 Tables and clauses for detailed testing and curing procedures.
Clause 3.5 Highlights:
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| Wet Jute/Coir Mats | Laid over the surface and kept moist continuously to retain water. |
| Wet Paddy Straw | Spread on the surface to preserve moisture; suitable for cambered roads. |
| Water Ponding | Water pooled on pavement surface; less effective on cambered roads due to runoff. |
flowchart LR
A[Fresh Concrete] --> B[Cover with Wet Jute/Coir Mats or Paddy Straw]
B --> C[Maintain Moisture Continuously]
A --> D[Water Ponding]
D --> E{Is Surface Cambered?}
E -- Yes --> F[Water Runs Off; Uneven Curing]
E -- No --> G[Water Retained; Effective Curing]
Refer to relevant clauses in MORD 26 and IRC:44-2008 for curing guidelines.
Traffic Opening Recommendations (MORD 26)
Curing & Early Traffic:
Timing:
Quality Checks Before Opening:
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Initial Curing | Wet mats/straw for 3-7 days |
| Light Traffic Allowed | After initial curing |
| Full Traffic Allowed | After achieving design strength (28 days) |
| Quality Tests | Core strength, visual checks, Benkel Beam deflection |
flowchart TD
A[Concrete Placement] --> B[Curing with Wet Mats/Straw]
B --> C{Initial Curing Period (3-7 Days)}
C -->|Complete| D[Allow Light Traffic]
D --> E{Concrete Strength Adequate?}
E -->|No| D
E -->|Yes| F[Allow Full Traffic]
F --> G[Conduct Quality Tests]
This protocol ensures safe traffic introduction, minimizing damage risk.
Top Surface Appearance Considerations (MORD 26)
Visual Aspects (Clause 13):
Curing Effects (Clause 3.5):
Aggregate Gradation (Clause 26.5):
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
flowchart LR
A[Plastic Formwork] --> B[Visible Surface Outlines]
B --> C[Cracks Form Along Joints]
D[Camber 3-3.5%] --> E[Improved Water Curing]
E --> F[Use of Wet Jute/Coir Mats or Paddy Straw]
F --> G[Light Traffic Permitted]
H[Ponding Method] --> I[Uneven Water Distribution]
I --> J[Drying on Elevated Surface]
Note: Proper curing and aggregate grading are essential for a durable and visually satisfactory pavement surface.
The Grouting Technique for flexible concrete pavements (Clause 14, MORD 26) involves filling pre-set plastic cells or voids with grout to form a composite pavement layer.
| Material | Proportion by Weight |
|---|---|
| Cement | 1 |
| Fine Aggregate | 1 to 2 (optional) |
| Water | 0.4 to 0.5 (w/c) |
flowchart TD
A[Prepare Subgrade] --> B[Place Plastic Cells]
B --> C[Pour Cement Grout into Cells]
C --> D[Finish Surface]
D --> E[Curing (Wet Mats or Ponding)]
E --> F[Open to Traffic]
This method enhances load distribution and reduces pavement thickness while maintaining flexibility.
Based on MORD 26 and Relevant IS Codes:
Concrete Layer Thickness:
Subbase Thickness:
Aggregate Requirements (Clause 26.5):
| Sieve Size (mm) | Percentage Passing by Weight |
|---|---|
| 26.50 | 100 |
| 19 | 80 - 100 |
| 9.50 | 55 - 80 |
| 4.75 | 35 - 60 |
| 0.60 | 10 - 35 |
| 0.075 | 0 - 8 |
| Layer | Thickness (mm) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Cell-filled Concrete | 50 - 100 | Based on traffic; 100 mm for low volume roads |
| Granular Subbase (GSB) | ≥ 100 | Minimum for structural safety |
graph TD
A[Cell-Filled Concrete (50-100 mm)] --> B[Granular Subbase (≥ 100 mm)]
B --> C[Subgrade with CBR ≥ 5]
References: MORD 26, IRC standards, and IS codes for detailed design.
Benefits of Cell Filled Concrete Pavements (MORD 26, Clause 16.0):
| Feature | Advantage |
|---|---|
| Joint Elimination | Reduced maintenance |
| Aggregate Savings | Approximately 50% reduction |
| Pavement Thickness | Thinner for cost savings |
| Construction Cost | Lower than traditional CC |
| Repairability | Simple block replacement |
| Sustainability | Use of recycled plastic |
flowchart LR
A[Plastic Cell Usage] --> B[Reduced Aggregate Consumption]
B --> C[Lower Construction Expenses]
A --> D[No Expansion Joints]
D --> E[Maintenance-Free Pavement]
C --> F[Economical Pavement Thickness]
F --> G[Ideal for Low Traffic]
E --> H[Extended Pavement Life]
A --> I[Simple Block Repairs]
This highlights the key benefits as per MORD 26 Clause 16.0.
Quality Testing After Construction (MORD 26, Clause 17.0):
Destructive Testing:
Non-Destructive Testing:
Benkel Beam Deflection Testing:
| Road Type | Road Width (m) | Deflection Measurement Distance from Edge (m) |
|---|---|---|
| Main Roads | 5.5 | 0.9 |
| Other Roads | 3.75 | 0.6 |
Notes: Core extraction and Benkel Beam deflection tests confirm pavement strength and durability. Visual inspections help identify early surface distress.
flowchart LR
A[Post-Construction Testing] --> B[Destructive Tests]
A --> C[Non-Destructive Visual Inspection]
A --> D[Benkel Beam Deflection Test]
B --> E[Core Extraction and Strength Testing]
C --> F[Surface Defect Identification]
D --> G[Deflection Measurement at 0.9m or 0.6m]
G --> H[Tests at 100m Intervals]
This comprehensive testing ensures pavement reliability and longevity.
Frequently Asked
The plastic cells used in pavement formwork, as per MORD 26, have side lengths ranging from 150 mm to 200 mm and a depth of about 100 mm. Manufactured from 0.22 mm thick LDPE sheets, approximately 1250 kg of plastic is needed for a 3.75 m wide, 1 km long road. Cells are formed by welding strips at 300 mm intervals in a staggered configuration. Nylon ropes are threaded through the cell walls to prevent collapse during concrete placement, and iron spikes about 200 mm long are inserted at cell corners to keep the formwork taut, removed after concrete filling. Rolls cover 3.75 m width and 10-20 m length. Concrete filled into cells has a target 28-day strength of 30 MPa and slump between 30-50 mm.
For the concrete mix, the coarse aggregates should be strong crushed stone or gravel with an Aggregate Impact Value less than 30% and a Flakiness Index not exceeding 40%, with a maximum size of 26.5 mm. For very low traffic roads (<50 vehicles/day), natural riverbed or pit-run gravel may be used. Fine aggregates should be clean natural sand or crushed stone meeting gradation requirements. The aggregate gradation follows Table 1 with passing percentages at various sieve sizes ensuring workability and strength. Proportions must be by weight, using calibrated boxes for cement and aggregates, and water volume controlled accurately.
The subgrade preparation involves compacting the top 300 mm of embankment soil in two layers to at least 100% maximum dry density (per IS:2729 Part 7), using good quality soil with a CBR above 5; borrow soil is used if embankment soil is poor. For expansive black cotton soil, compaction to 95% MDD at 2% above optimum moisture is recommended along with lime stabilization. Subbase materials include laterite consolidation, water bound macadam, stabilized soils, among others, with a soaked CBR minimum of 20 for stabilized soils when aggregates are scarce. For traffic exceeding 50 commercial vehicles/day, a 150 mm thick cementitious subbase with 7-day compressive strength of at least 1.5 MPa is required. Edge protection with stone or concrete blocks projecting 50-100 mm above subgrade or subbase confines the pavement. Compaction is performed using a 6-8 ton vibratory or static roller following a sequence of static and vibratory passes, adjusted per aggregate characteristics.
Recommended concrete mixes include normal concrete with 28-day characteristic strength of 30 MPa and slump between 30 to 50 mm, often incorporating superplasticizers to reduce water demand. Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) with similar strength is also suitable. Cement must conform to specified standards, and fly ash from electrostatic precipitators may partially replace cement with restrictions. Adjust water content based on aggregate moisture and weather. Subgrade should be moistened before placement. Compaction for RCC involves 1-2 static passes, 2 vibratory passes, and 1-2 static passes with a 6-8 ton roller; conventional concrete is compacted using pan vibrators. A camber between 2.5% to 3% must be maintained to ensure drainage.
Quality control after pavement construction involves destructive testing by extracting cores for compressive strength and integrity evaluation, and non-destructive testing through visual inspections to detect surface defects such as cracks, blow-ups, corner breaks, faulting, and pumping. Additionally, the Benkel Beam Deflection Test is utilized to measure pavement deflection at specified distances from the edge—0.9 m for main roads and 0.6 m for narrower roads—conducted every 100 meters along the pavement. These tests combined ensure structural adequacy and help identify early distress, confirming the pavement’s durability and performance.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in MORD 26. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required