The 1987 edition of IS 875 Part 4 establishes guidelines for assessing snow loads on building and structure roofs across India, particularly in snow-prone mountainous regions. It assists engineers and designers in evaluating design snow loads by utilizing ground snow load values and shape coefficients tailored to various roof geometries, ensuring structural resilience against snow accumulation and drifting.
Overview
The 1987 edition of IS 875 Part 4 establishes guidelines for assessing snow loads on building and structure roofs across India, particularly in snow-prone mountainous regions. It assists engineers and designers in evaluating design snow loads by utilizing ground snow load values and shape coefficients tailored to various roof geometries, ensuring structural resilience against snow accumulation and drifting.
Audience
Contents
Structure
| Roof Angle (A) | Flat/Monopitch Roof Coefficient (M1) | Multi-pitched Roof Coefficient (M2) |
|---|---|---|
| 0° < A ≤ 30° | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 15° < A < 30° | 0.8 | 0.8 + 0.4 × (A - 15)/15 |
| 30° < A < 60° | 0.8 × (60 - A)/30 | 1.2 × (60 - A)/30 |
| A > 60° | 0 | 0 |
S = p × S₀
| Roof Type | Slope Range (°) | M₁ (Positive Slope) | M₂ (Negative Slope) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple pitched roof | 0° < A ≤ 30° | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 15° < A < 30° | 0.8 | 0.8 + 0.4 × (A-15)/15 | |
| 30° < A ≤ 60° | 0.8 × (60 - A)/30 | 1.2 × (60 - A)/30 | |
| A > 60° | 0 | 0 |
| Roof Type | Shape Coefficient (C_s) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flat Roof | 0.8 – 1.0 | Uniform snow loading |
| Sloping Roof (<15°) | 0 – 0.5 | Lower snow retention |
| Sloping Roof (>15°) | 0.8 – 2.0 | Incorporates sliding/drift |
| Multi-level Roofs | Calculated | Combined sliding and wind |
Frequently Asked
According to IS 875 Part 4 (1987), the design snow load on roofs is computed by multiplying the characteristic ground snow load (S₀) with a shape coefficient (p) that accounts for roof geometry and snow accumulation patterns. The process involves identifying the ground snow load for the location, determining the appropriate shape coefficient based on roof slope and exposure, and calculating the roof snow load as S = p × S₀. The design should use the greater value between the calculated snow load or imposed loads specified in IS 875 Part 2 to ensure safety.
Shape coefficients vary depending on roof configuration to reflect snow distribution characteristics. For flat roofs, coefficients typically range from 0.7 to 1.0. Sloping roofs with slopes greater than 30° usually have coefficients between 0.8 and 1.0. Gable and curved roofs similarly use coefficients within this range. These coefficients can be reduced by 25% if the roof is fully exposed to wind with no obstructions that trap snow. Detailed values are provided in Clause 4.2 and Appendix A of IS 875 Part 4.
Snow load considerations are essential primarily in mountainous northern areas of India receiving snowfall 2–3 times annually. Notable regions include districts in Jammu & Kashmir (Baramula, Srinagar, Anantnag, Ladakh), Punjab and Himachal Pradesh (Chamba, Kulu, Kinnaur, Mahasu, Mandi, Sirmur, Shimla), and parts of Uttar Pradesh (now Uttarakhand) such as Dehradun, Tehri Garhwal, Almora, and Nainital. Structural designs in these areas must incorporate snow loads per IS 875 Part 4.
The code accounts for snow drifting and sliding by applying shape coefficients that modify the uniform ground snow load to reflect non-uniform accumulation caused by wind and roof geometry. For multi-level roofs, the total snow load is calculated as a sum of sliding snow load and wind-induced drift load, with considerations for drift length and wind pressure coefficients within specified restrictions. Additional loads are applied on slopes exceeding 15°, incorporating 50% of the maximum adjacent upper roof load. Where conditions permit, coefficients may be reduced by 25% to account for wind exposure.
IS 875 Part 4 provides guidance on ice loading for overhead wires such as electrical and communication cables in regions prone to icing. Ice thickness ranging from 3 mm to 10 mm is considered, with ice density taken as 900 kg/m³. The effective diameter of the wire increases by twice the ice thickness, which is used to compute the ice load per unit length via the formula w = π × d_ice × t × ρ × g. Additionally, wind force calculations on iced wires use the enlarged diameter to ensure accurate load assessment. Local climatic data should be referenced for precise ice thickness selection.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 875 PART 4. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required