The 1981 edition of IS 9759 outlines detailed instructions for managing dewatering processes in construction, particularly for standard civil engineering works excluding river valley and specialized projects. It encompasses techniques, design fundamentals, equipment choice, and soil factors essential for controlling groundwater during excavation and foundation work. This code serves as a vital reference for engineers in charge of planning and implementing dewatering to ensure structural stability and safety onsite.
Overview
The 1981 edition of IS 9759 outlines detailed instructions for managing dewatering processes in construction, particularly for standard civil engineering works excluding river valley and specialized projects. It encompasses techniques, design fundamentals, equipment choice, and soil factors essential for controlling groundwater during excavation and foundation work. This code serves as a vital reference for engineers in charge of planning and implementing dewatering to ensure structural stability and safety onsite.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Discharge to a fully penetrating slot under artesian conditions: [Q = k D x L (H - h_e)]
Discharge to a fully penetrating slot under gravity flow: [Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k_x 2L]
Discharge to a partially penetrating slot under gravity flow: [Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H - h_o}) k_x H' L]
Discharge to a slot from two partially penetrating line sources: [Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) L + Y D] with (Y) dependent on the (W/D) ratio.
| Symbol | Description |
|---|---|
| (H) | Original groundwater level |
| (h_e) | Groundwater level at the point of use |
| (h_o) | Reference groundwater level |
| (k) | Hydraulic conductivity |
| (D) | Depth of permeable stratum |
| (L) | Length of slot or well screen |
| (x) | Distance along flow direction |
| (Y) | Geometry-dependent factor |
| Method | Suitable Soil Types | Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravel and coarse sand | Simple to operate | Potential for soil instability, difficulty in fine particle removal |
This standard offers directives for dewatering during construction activities, specifically excluding river valley projects and powerhouses located in boulder/gravel sections.
| Condition | Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating slot - Artesian | (Q = k D x L (H - h_e)) | (H): initial water level, (h_e): water level at usage point |
| Fully penetrating slot - Gravity | (Q = 5/7 (H - h_e) k_x 2L) | (L): distance from line source, (D): depth of permeable layer |
| Partially penetrating slot - Artesian | (Q = k D x (H - h_e) L + E) | (E): correction factor |
| Partially penetrating slot - Gravity | (Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k_x 2L) | Adjustment for partial penetration |
Where parameters include well spacing, depth, radius, and uplift factors.
| Method | Soil Suitability | Application | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravels, coarse sands | Shallow excavations | Simple equipment | Instability, fine particle issues |
| Wellpoint System | Sandy gravels to fine sands | Excavations | Economical, quick | Limited suction lift, noise |
IS 9759: Key Definitions and Discharge Formulas
| Slot Type | Flow Condition | Discharge Equation | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partially penetrating | Artesian | (Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) L + Y D) | (Y) depends on (W/D) ratio |
| Partially penetrating | Gravity | (Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H'}) k_x H' L) | (H'): penetration depth |
| Fully penetrating | Either | (Q = 2 imes) (value from single line source) | Slot is midway between sources |
flowchart LR
A[Water Table Height H] --> B[Slot with Depth H']
B --> C{Flow Condition}
IS 9759: Basic Principles of Dewatering
Operation Guidelines (7.9): Dewatering methods should be selected considering soil type, groundwater levels, and construction needs.
Soil Particle Size Influence (5.2):
| Soil Type | Particle Size Range | Recommended Dewatering Method |
|---|---|---|
| Coarse Sand | >0.06 mm | Wellpoint systems, deep wells |
| Fine Sand | 0.02 - 0.06 mm | Wellpoint, ejector methods |
| Silty Sand | 0.002 - 0.02 mm | Vacuum dewatering, cutoff walls |
| Clay & Silt | <0.002 mm | Electro-osmosis, freezing techniques |
Drawdown (s): [s = H - h]
Flow Rate for Wellpoint System (Q): [Q = \frac{2 \pi K D s}{\ln(R/r)}]
Where (K) is permeability, (D) aquifer thickness, (R) radius of influence, and (r) well radius.
IS 9759: Soil Exploration and Conditions
| Sand Type | Permeability Coefficient (cm/sec) |
|---|---|
| Very fine sand | 1 to 50 |
| Fine sand | 51 to 200 |
| Fine to medium sand | 201 to 500 |
| Medium sand | 501 to 1000 |
| Medium to coarse sand | 1001 to 1500 |
| Gravel and coarse sand | 1501 to 3000 |
[k = C_1 \times D_{10}]
Where (k) is permeability, (C_1) is a constant (100-150), and (D_{10}) is effective grain size. Applicable for uniform sands with uniformity coefficient ≤ 2.
flowchart LR
A[Subsurface Exploration] --> B[Soil Type Identification]
B --> C[Permeability Assessment]
C --> D{Pumping Test Conducted?}
D -- Yes --> E[Use Measured Permeability]
D -- No --> F[Estimate k via Formula]
E & F --> G[Choose Dewatering System]
IS 9759: Selection Criteria for Dewatering Techniques
| Soil Type | Recommended Dewatering Approach |
|---|---|
| Clean gravel/coarse sand | Sump pumping |
| Sandy gravel to fine sand | Wellpoint with pumps |
| Gravel to silty fine sand | Deep bored filter wells |
| Silts, silty clays, peat | Electro-osmosis |
| Sands and silty sands | Jet eductor systems |
| Method | Soil Suitability | Application | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravel, coarse sand | Shallow excavation | Simple | Soil instability, fine removal problems |
| Wellpoint System | Sandy gravels to fine sands | Excavations | Rapid, cost-effective | Limited suction depth, noise |
| Deep Bored Wells | Gravels to silty sands | Deep excavations | No drawdown limit | Expensive, complex |
| Electro-osmosis | Silts, clays | Specialized soils | Works where others fail | High cost |
| Jet Eductor | Sands, silty sands | Deep confined sites | Unlimited drawdown | Costly, flood risk |
| Penetration | Flow Type | Discharge Equation | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating | Artesian | (Q = k D x L (H - h_e)) | (H): original water level |
| Fully penetrating | Gravity | (Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k x 2L) | Flow rate calculations |
| Penetration | Flow Type | Discharge Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating | Artesian | (Q = k D x L (H - h_e)) | (k): permeability, (D): depth, (L): slot length |
| Fully penetrating | Gravity | (Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k x 2L) | (H): initial water level, (h_e): water level at use |
| Partially penetrating | Artesian | (Q = k D x (H - h_e) L + E) | (E): empirical correction |
| Partially penetrating | Gravity | (Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k x 2Z (H_0 - h_0)) | See IS 9759 for details |
| Method | Suitable Soils | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravel, coarse sand | Economical, simple for shallow sites | May cause soil instability |
| Wellpoint System | Sandy gravel to fine sand | Efficient and cost-effective | Limited suction depth, noise |
IS 9759: Specifications and Formulas for Wellpoint and Deep Well Installations
| Diameter (mm) | Max Capacity (L/s) |
|---|---|
| 150 | 10 - 20 |
| 200 | 20 - 40 |
| 300 | 40 - 80 |
Consult IS 9759 Table 8 for detailed data.
IS 9759: Guidelines for Installing and Operating Deep Well Systems
| Well Diameter (mm) | Max Capacity (m³/hr) |
|---|---|
| 150 | 20 - 30 |
| 200 | 30 - 50 |
| 250 | 50 - 70 |
Refer to IS 9759 Table 8 for precise specifications.
flowchart LR
A[Deep Well] --> B[Turbine/Submersible Pump]
B --> C[Pump Base]
C --> D{Is Water Flowing Through Soil?}
D -- Yes --> E[Install Wellpoints & Sand Drains]
D -- No --> F[Stable Pump Foundation]
IS 9759: Essential Formulas and Details for Sump Pumping
Estimate pump capacity needed for surface runoff control:
[ID = QR - V \times T]
Where:
This formula assists in sizing pumps to avoid overflow.
| Pump Type | Application |
|---|---|
| Centrifugal | General sump pumping |
| Submersible | Deep sump or submerged operations |
| Wellpoint Pumps | Groundwater control with wellpoints |
Apply standard discharge equations like Manning's formula for surface runoff estimation.
Used for groundwater lowering around excavations.
flowchart TD
A[Rainfall] --> B[Surface Runoff (QR)]
B --> C[Sump Volume (V)]
C --> D[Pump Capacity (Q)]
D --> E[Discharge]
E --> F[Flood Prevention]
Summary: Calculate pump size using runoff and sump volume; select pump type based on application; apply hydraulic formulas for surface water management.
IS 9759: Guidelines for Ensuring Safety and Stability in Dewatering
| Condition | Discharge Formula | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating slot (Artesian) | (Q = k D x L (H - h_e)) | Hydraulic conductivity, depth, length, initial and use water levels |
| Fully penetrating slot (Gravity) | (Q = 5.7 (H - h_e) k 2L) | Same as above |
| Partially penetrating slot (Artesian) | (Q = k D x (H - h_e) (L + E)) | Correction factor applied |
| Partially penetrating slot (Gravity) | (Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k 2Z (H_0 - h_0)) | Additional depth parameters |
| Filter Characteristic | Ratio (R_{50}) | Ratio (R_{15}) |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform grain size (U=3-4) | 5 to 10 | -- |
| Well graded, subrounded | 12 to 58 | 12 to 40 |
| Well graded, angular | 9 to 30 | 6 to 18 |
Proper filter design prevents soil piping under high hydraulic gradients.
IS 9759: Overview of Electro-Osmosis Method
[Q = -k_g \times i \times z / a]
| Parameter | Description | Typical Unit/Value |
|---|---|---|
| (Q) | Discharge rate at well | cm³/sec |
| (k_g) | Electro-osmotic permeability coefficient | ~(0.5 \times 10^{-4}) cm/(V·cm) |
| (i) | Electric potential gradient | V/cm |
| (z) | Depth of soil treated | cm |
| (a) | Effective well spacing | cm |
flowchart LR
A[Electric Field Applied] --> B[Pore Water Movement]
B --> C[Water Collected at Wells]
C --> D[Discharge to Absorption or Recharge Wells]
Summary: Use electro-osmosis for very low permeability soils; calculate discharge with (Q = -k_g i z / a); ensure proper disposal to maintain groundwater balance.
IS 9759: Summary of Hydraulic Calculations and Flow Formulas
| Slot Penetration | Flow Condition | Discharge Equation | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully penetrating slot | Artesian | (Q = k D x L (H - h_e)) | (H): initial groundwater level, (h_e): water level at use, (L): slot length, (D): permeable stratum depth |
| Gravity | (Q = 0.57 (H - h_e) k 2L) | ||
| Partially penetrating slot | Artesian | (Q = 2 k D x (H - h_e) (L + Y D)) | (Y) depends on penetration ratio |
| Gravity | (Q = (0.73 + 0.27 \frac{H - h_e}{H}) k 2L (H' - h_{2e})) | (H') penetration depth |
[h = h_e + (H - h_e) \frac{y + D}{L + y D}]
[H - h = (n + \ln \frac{a}{r_w}) \frac{Q}{2 \pi k D} \quad \text{(fully penetrating wells)}]
[H - h = \text{similar with correction factor for partial penetration}]
Where (a) is well spacing, (r_w) is effective radius, (f_a) uplift factor.
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| (Q) | Discharge rate |
| (k) | Hydraulic conductivity |
IS 9759: Formulas and Specifications for Selecting Pumps
Required pump power is computed as:
[Horsepower = \frac{\text{Total discharge (gpm)} \times \text{Total dynamic head (m)}}{3960 \times \text{Efficiency}}]
| Parameter | Typical Value |
|---|---|
| Wellpoint pump vacuum | 6 to 7.5 m (design 6 m) |
| Minimum well diameter for deep pumps | ≥ 150 mm |
| Jet eductor lowering capacity | 15 to 30 m |
| Jet eductor flow rate | Less than 10-15 gpm |
flowchart TD
A[Pump Selection] --> B[Calculate Horsepower]
B --> C{Discharge x Head}
C --> D[Divide by 3960 x Efficiency]
A --> E[Choose Pump Type]
E --> F[Deep Well Pump (≥150 mm)]
E --> G[Wellpoint Pump]
[H - h = \frac{n + \ln(\frac{a}{r_w})}{k D} \times Q]
[H - h = f_a \times \frac{n + \ln(\frac{a}{r_w})}{k D} \times Q]
Where parameters include groundwater levels, well spacing, depth, and uplift factors.
| Filter Type | (R_{50}) Ratio | (R_{15}) Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform (U=3-4) | 5 to 10 | -- |
| Well graded, subrounded | 12 to 58 | 12 to 40 |
| Well graded, angular | 9 to 30 | 6 to 18 |
Proper filter design is essential to prevent piping under high hydraulic gradients.
| Method | Suitable Soils | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sump Pumping | Clean gravel, coarse sand | Simple and low cost | Potential instability |
Frequently Asked
IS 9759 (1981) specifies that the choice of dewatering technique primarily depends on soil type and particle size distribution. According to Clause 5.1, subsurface investigations identify soil characteristics which inform method selection. Clause 5.2 recommends plotting particle size data on grading curves (Fig. 1) to select appropriate systems. Table I outlines methods such as wellpoint systems and deep wells for coarse soils; wellpoints and ejector wells for medium-grained soils; and vacuum dewatering or electro-osmosis for fine-grained soils with low permeability. This ensures dewatering is efficient and suited to soil conditions.
Per IS 9759 Clause 6.3.7, pump horsepower is calculated using the formula: Horsepower = (Total discharge in gpm × Total dynamic head in meters) divided by (3960 × Efficiency). Total dynamic head accounts for vacuum at pump intake minus friction losses, while efficiency represents combined pump and engine efficiency in decimal form. This calculation ensures adequate pump power for required flow and head conditions, with vacuum typically assumed as 6 meters for wellpoint systems.
Key design factors per IS 9759 include determining the number, size, spacing, and penetration depth of wellpoints or wells to achieve desired groundwater lowering (Clause 6.1). Design follows steps outlined in Clauses 6.3 and 6.3.13.2, considering layout and yield calculations. Deep well pumps should be turbine or submersible types for wells ≥150 mm diameter, with pump selection based on capacity to limit discharge rather than aquifer yield (Clause 6.3.13.6). Table 8 provides typical pump capacities. Proper installation and operation as described in Clause 7 are essential for system efficiency.
IS 9759 recommends electro-osmosis for soils with very low permeability (less than 0.5 × 10⁻⁴ cm/sec), such as silts and clays, where conventional gravity drainage is ineffective. This method uses an electric field to move pore water toward collection wells, although it is costly and applied only when necessary (Clauses 2.4, Appendix A). Sand drains may be installed to bypass impervious layers within sandy soils to prevent drawdown breaks. For higher permeability soils, wells, wellpoints, vacuum systems, and gravel filters are used, depending on grain size as shown in Clause 2.5 Fig. 1.
IS 9759 advises multiple safety precautions to maintain excavation stability during dewatering. These include removing standing water via perimeter ditches sloping to sumps to control flow velocity and prevent erosion; installing boards, stones, or concrete over ditches for protection; using open-jointed pipes with gravel filters for drainage; designing systems to lower water tables and intercept seepage; and managing lateral earth pressures to prevent heaving. Surface water runoff control using dikes, ditches, sumps, pumps, and slope protection like mulching and seeding is crucial. Comprehensive subsurface investigations guide appropriate dewatering design to ensure site safety.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 9759. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required