IS 13622:1993 provides a systematic classification of Indian timber species tailored for furniture and cabinet production, evaluating attributes like strength, density, grain, finishing quality, and seasoning behavior. It organizes 103 species into four distinct groups to guide professionals in selecting wood that meets durability, aesthetic, and functional standards. The code also specifies standards for acceptable defects, moisture levels, and preservative treatments to ensure longevity and performance in furniture applications.
Overview
IS 13622:1993 provides a systematic classification of Indian timber species tailored for furniture and cabinet production, evaluating attributes like strength, density, grain, finishing quality, and seasoning behavior. It organizes 103 species into four distinct groups to guide professionals in selecting wood that meets durability, aesthetic, and functional standards. The code also specifies standards for acceptable defects, moisture levels, and preservative treatments to ensure longevity and performance in furniture applications.
Audience
Contents
Structure
Scope (Clause 3.1):
Group III Timbers (Clause 4.1.4 & Annex D):
| Sl No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abies densa | Red Fir |
| 7 | Azadirachta indica | Neem |
| 25 | Pinus roxburghii | Chir Pine |
| 31 | Robinia pseudoacacia | Black Locust |
| 24 | Pinus kesiya | Khasi Pine |
(Complete species listing available in Annex D of IS 13622)
General Criteria (Clause 5.2.5):
flowchart TD
A[IS 13622 Scope] --> B[Timber as per IS 707]
A --> C[Group III Timber Criteria]
C --> D[Strength Coefficient ≥ 50]
C --> E[Weight relative to Teak]
C --> F[Grain and Finish Quality]
C --> G[Annex D Species List]
A --> H[General Specifications]
H --> I[Max Bow and Spring: 1 mm/m]
Clause 3.1:
| Group | Description | Examples (Commercial Names) |
|---|---|---|
| Super Group (Annex A) | Timbers with highest durability | Teak (Tectona grandis), Rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia), Walnut (Juglans regia) |
| Group I (Annex B) | Durable timbers | Safed Siris (Albizia procera), Jarul (Lagerstroemia speciosa) |
| Group II (Annex C) | Moderately durable timbers | Maple (Acer spp.), Deodar (Cedrus deodara), Rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) |
| Group III (Annex D) | Less durable timbers | Red Fir (Abies densa), Neem (Azadirachta indica), Spruce (Picea smithiana) |
| SL No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albizia lebbeck | Kokko |
| 2 | Dalbergia latifolia | Rosewood |
| 3 | Tectona grandis | Teak |
| ... | ... | ... |
This classification is fundamental for specifying timber in furniture and cabinetry per IS 13622 to ensure performance and durability.
flowchart LR
A[Timber Species] --> B{Durability Group}
B -->|Super Group| C[Highly Durable]
B -->|Group I| D[Durable]
B -->|Group II| E[Moderately Durable]
B -->|Group III| F[Less Durable]
IS 13622: Classification Parameters for Timber Species
Timbers are divided into four categories based on strength coefficient, weight relative to teak (100), and grain/finish quality:
| Group | Strength Coefficient | Weight (Teak = 100) | Grain & Finish Quality | Annex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group (4.1.1) | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Excellent polish and appearance | Annex A |
| Group I (4.1.2) | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Very good polish and appearance | Annex B |
| Group II (4.1.3) | ≥ 65 | 70 to 120 | Good polish and general appearance | Annex C |
| Group III (4.1.4) | ≥ 50 | Not specifically defined | Satisfactory polish and appearance | Annex D |
Additional General Criterion (4.1.1):
flowchart TD
A[Timber Species Input] --> B{Strength Coefficient}
B -->|≥ 75| C{Weight 85-110}
C -->|Yes| D[Assign Super Group or Group I]
C -->|No| E[Group II or III]
B -->|65 to <75| E
B -->|50 to <65| F[Group III]
D --> G[Check Grain & Finish]
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H[Group Assignment & Annex Reference]
Timber species are segmented into four groups based on strength, specific gravity, and aesthetic qualities.
| Group | Strength Coefficient | Weight (Teak = 100) | Grain & Finish Quality | Annex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group (Clause 4.1.1) | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Excellent polish and appearance | Annex A |
| Group I (Clause 4.1.2) | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Very good polish and appearance | Annex B |
| Group II (Clause 4.1.3) | ≥ 65 | 70 to 120 | Good polish and appearance | Annex C |
| Group III (Clause 4.1.4) | Criteria not precisely specified | - | - | - |
Annex B - Group I Timbers
| Sl No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albizia procera | Safed Siris |
| 2 | Amoora spp. | Amari |
| 12 | Pterocarpus marsupium | Bijasal |
| * | Fraxinus excelsior | Ash |
Annex C - Group II Timbers
| Sl No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acer spp. | Maple |
| 10 | Cedrus deodara | Deodar |
| 19 | Hevea brasiliensis | Rubber Wood |
| 42 | Toona ciliata | Toon |
flowchart TD
A[Timber Species] --> B[Super Group (Annex A)]
A --> C[Group I (Annex B)]
A --> D[Group II (Annex C)]
A --> E[Group III (Annex D)]
IS 13622: Summary of General Requirements
Group III (Clause 4.1.4):
Group II (Clause 4.1.2):
| Group | Strength Coefficient | Weight (Teak=100) | Grain & Finish Quality | Annex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group II | ≥ 75 | 85 - 110 | Very good polish and look | Annex B |
| Group III | ≥ 50 | Relative to teak | Satisfactory finish | Annex D |
For detailed species lists and defect specifications, consult Annex B, Annex D, and Clause 5.2 of IS 13622.
flowchart LR
A[Timber Selection] --> B{Strength Coefficient}
B -->|≥ 75| C[Group II]
B -->|≥ 50 and <75| D[Group III]
C --> E[Weight 85-110 (Teak=100)]
D --> F[Weight relative to Teak]
C --> G[Very Good Finish]
D --> H[Satisfactory Finish]
Key Points on Seasoning and Moisture Content from IS 13622
Seasoning Requirements (Clauses 3.1 & 6):
Timber must be dried to moisture levels specified in IS 287:1973, employing seasoning methods outlined in IS 1141:1973.
Moisture Measurement Methods:
Permissible Moisture Content:
Refer IS 287:1973 for maximum moisture limits depending on timber application, generally between 12% to 15% for furniture.
Wane Restrictions (Clause 5.2.7):
Preservative Treatments (Clause 7):
Sapwood of durable and Class III species must be treated following IS 401:1982.
| Application | Max Moisture Content (%) |
|---|---|
| Furniture and Cabinets | 12 to 15 |
| Structural Timber | 15 to 18 |
| General Utility Timber | Up to 20 |
[ MC = \frac{W_{green} - W_{dry}}{W_{dry}} \times 100 ]
flowchart TD
A[Fresh Timber] --> B[Seasoning per IS 1141]
B --> C[Moisture Content Check (IS 11215)]
C -->|MC ≤ Limit| D[Approved for Use]
C -->|MC > Limit| B
1. Moisture and Seasoning Compliance:
2. Treatment Necessity:
3. Timber Groupings and Treatment:
| Group | Timber Category | Treatment Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Super Group | Highly durable species | Typically no preservative needed |
| Group I | Moderately durable species | Preservative treatment mandatory |
| Group II | Less durable or unknown species | Preservative treatment mandatory |
flowchart TD
A[Timber Species] --> B{Durability Class}
B -->|Class I & II| C[Minimal or No Treatment]
B -->|Class III or Sapwood| D[Preservative Treatment Required]
D --> E[Treatment Methods & Chemicals]
Clause 4.1.1 - Criteria:
| Sl No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name | Sl No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albizia lebbeck | Kokko | 8 | Dysoxylum malabaricum | White Cedar |
| 2 | Albizia odoratissima | Kala Siris | 9 | Gluta travancorica | Gluta |
| 3 | *Chloroxylon swietenia | Satin Wood | 10 | *Juglans regia | Walnut |
| 4 | Chukrasia velutina | Chickrassy | 11 | Phoebe hainesiana | Bonsum |
| 5 | Dalbergia latifolia | Rosewood | 12 | Pterocarpus dalbergioides | Padauk |
| 6 | Dalbergia sissoides | Rosewood | 13 | Tectona grandis | Teak |
| 7 | Dalbergia sissoo | Sissoo | * | Species requiring treatment |
| Property | Super Group Timbers | Reference (Teak = 100) |
|---|---|---|
| Strength Coefficient | ≥ 75 | 100 |
| Weight | 85 to 110 | 100 |
| Shape Retention | > 60 | 100 |
IS 13622: Overview of Group I Timbers
| Sl No. | Botanical Name | Commercial Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albizia procera | Safed Siris |
| 3 | Aphanamixis polystachya | Pitraj |
| 4 | Artocarpus hirsutus | Aini |
| 9 | Lagerstroemia speciosa | Jarul |
| 12 | Pterocarpus marsupium | Bijasal |
| 14 | Zanthoxylum rhesta | Mullilam |
Note: Species marked with * require treatment; + indicates uncertain durability.
| Parameter | Value/Range |
|---|---|
| Strength Coefficient | ≥ 75 |
| Weight (Teak = 100) | 85 to 110 |
| Appearance | Excellent grain and polish |
| Moisture Content | As per IS 287 & IS 1141 |
| Preservative Treatment | Mandatory for sapwood |
flowchart LR
A[Timber Candidate] --> B{Meets Group I Criteria?}
B --> C[Strength ≥ 75]
B --> D[Weight 85-110 (Teak=100)]
B --> E[Excellent Grain & Finish]
B --> F[Meets Moisture Content Standards]
B --> G[Requires Preservative Treatment]
C & D & E & F & G --> H[Classify as Group I Timber]
Group II (Annex C, Clause 4.1.3) consists of species with moderate strength and durability, appropriate for furniture and general use.
| Attribute | Group II Timber Values | Reference Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Strength Coefficient | ~50 to 75 | IS 13622 Clause 4.1.3 |
| Weight (Teak = 100) | 85 to 110 | IS 13622 Clause 4.1.3 |
| Moisture Content | As per IS 287:1973 | IS 287:1973, IS 1141:1973 |
| Preservative Treatment | Sapwood and Class III timbers | IS 401:1982 |
flowchart TD
A[Group II Timber Candidates] --> B[Strength 50-75]
A --> C[Weight 85-110 (Teak=100)]
A --> D[Good Grain and Finish]
A --> E[Seasoning per IS 287]
A --> F[Preservative Treatment per IS 401]
Classification Criteria (Clause 4.1.4):
| Group | Strength Coefficient | Weight (Teak = 100) | Grain and Finish Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Excellent polish and appearance |
| Group I | Specified in Annex B | Specified in Annex B | Very good polish and finish |
| Group II | Specified in Annex C | Specified in Annex C | Good polish and appearance |
| Group III | ≥ 50 | Relative to teak | Satisfactory polish and look |
For design strength formulas or values, please request specific details.
Frequently Asked
IS 13622 classifies timber species into four groups considering the following criteria:
| Group | Strength Coefficient | Weight (Teak = 100) | Grain, Texture, Finish & Appearance | Reference Annex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Super Group (4.1.1) | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Excellent polish and appearance | Annex A |
| Group I (4.1.2) | ≥ 75 | 85 to 110 | Very good polish and appearance | Annex B |
| Group II (4.1.3) | ≥ 65 | 70 to 120 | Good polish and general appearance | Annex C |
| Group III (4.1.4) | ≥ 50 | Not specified | Satisfactory polish and appearance | Annex D |
Additionally, furniture-grade timbers should have a shape retention value greater than 60 (teak = 100). This classification assists in selecting woods appropriate for furniture and cabinetry based on mechanical strength and aesthetic qualities.
For furniture demanding superior strength, IS 13622 identifies the following groups:
Examples include Teak (Tectona grandis), Rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia), and Albizia procera (Safed Siris).
These groups are best suited for high-strength furniture due to their superior mechanical and aesthetic properties.
IS 13622 mandates that timber for furniture and cabinets must be free from the following defects:
Additional quality requirements include adequate strength (e.g., strength coefficient ≥ 75 for Super Group), shape retention above 60 relative to teak, smooth finish, fine grain and texture, and ease of seasoning and machining to ensure durability and appearance.
Timber intended for furniture and cabinetry should be seasoned as per IS 1141:1973 using suitable methods like air or kiln drying. Moisture content must comply with IS 287:1973, typically ranging between 12% and 15% for furniture-grade wood. Moisture determination can be done using oven drying or electrical moisture meters following IS 11215:1991. Proper seasoning ensures dimensional stability, strength, and resistance to biological degradation.
According to IS 13622, the sapwood of all durable timber species and those classified as durability class III must undergo preservative treatment as per IS 401:1982. This includes species listed in Groups I and II, which require treatment to protect against decay, fungi, and insect attacks. Treatment methods include pressure impregnation, dipping, or brushing with chemicals such as Copper Chrome Arsenate (CCA) or creosote. Compliance with seasoning standards (IS 287:1973) and moisture content limits is essential before treatment.
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 13622. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required