This standard outlines a procedure to assess the abrasion resistance of concrete by exposing 10 cm concrete cubes to an air-propelled silica sand blast. It provides a consistent approach for evaluating how concrete surfaces withstand wear caused by friction, scraping, or impact, making it useful for a variety of applications including pavements and industrial floors. The method also extends to materials such as stone and cement mortar.
Overview
This standard outlines a procedure to assess the abrasion resistance of concrete by exposing 10 cm concrete cubes to an air-propelled silica sand blast. It provides a consistent approach for evaluating how concrete surfaces withstand wear caused by friction, scraping, or impact, making it useful for a variety of applications including pavements and industrial floors. The method also extends to materials such as stone and cement mortar.
Audience
Contents
Structure
| Surface Type | Maximum Allowable Loss (%) |
|---|---|
| Concrete Pavements (mixed traffic) | 0.16 |
| Concrete Pavements (pneumatic tyres) | 0.24 |
| Industrial Floors | 0.16 |
| Dock Areas | 0.16 |
| Railway Platforms | 0.24 |
| Footpaths | 0.40 |
[ \text{Abrasion Loss} = \frac{\text{Weight Loss (g)}}{\text{Initial Weight (g)}} \times 100 ]
flowchart LR
A[Concrete Cubes] --> B[Three Cubes]
B --> C[Four Faces Each]
C --> D[Twelve Faces Total]
D --> E[Abrasion Test Conducted]
E --> F[Weight Reduction Measured]
F --> G[Calculate Percentage Loss]
G --> H[Report Average Abrasion Loss]
This approach guarantees uniform and dependable abrasion loss measurements in line with the standard.
| Surface Category | Max Abrasion Loss (%) |
|---|---|
| Concrete pavement (mixed traffic) | 0.16 |
| Concrete pavement (pneumatic tyres only) | 0.24 |
| Factory floors | 0.16 |
| Dockyards | 0.16 |
| Railway platforms | 0.24 |
| Footpaths | 0.40 |
[ \text{Abrasion Loss} = \frac{\text{Weight Loss}}{\text{Original Weight}} \times 100 ]
flowchart LR
A[3 Concrete Cubes] --> B[4 Faces Each]
B --> C[12 Faces Total]
C --> D[Measure Weight Loss (g)]
D --> E[Calculate % Abrasion Loss]
E --> F[Report Average Loss ±0.01 g]
This ensures abrasion resistance is evaluated uniformly according to the standard.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Air Pressure | 0.14 N/mm² (1.4 bar) |
| Sand Particle Size | Between 0.50 mm and 1.00 mm |
| Hopper Material | Galvanized iron, conical shape |
| Nozzle Attachment | Threaded with lock nut and washer |
| Sand Flow | Gravity assisted by hopper cone |
flowchart TD
A[Air Compressor] -->|Air @ 0.14 N/mm²| B[Pressure Gauge]
B --> C[Air Tubing]
C --> D[Nozzle through Hopper]
D --> E[Sand in Hopper]
E --> F[Concrete Cube Surface]
This ensures controlled sand impingement for consistent abrasion resistance testing.
| Surface Type | Max Abrasion Loss (%) |
|---|---|
| Concrete pavement (mixed traffic) | 0.16 |
| Concrete pavement (pneumatic tyres) | 0.24 |
| Factory floors | 0.16 |
| Dockyards | 0.16 |
| Railway platforms | 0.24 |
| Footpaths | 0.40 |
flowchart TB
A[Compressor] -->|0.14 N/mm² Air| B[Pressure Gauge]
B --> C[Copper/Brass Tubing]
C --> D[Nozzle Assembly]
D --> E[Conical Hopper with Sand]
E --> F[Specimen Holder on Cradle]
F --> G[Concrete Cube Specimen (10 cm)]
This configuration ensures accurate and reproducible abrasion testing.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Air Pressure | 0.14 N/mm² (1.4 bar) |
| Abrasive Sand | IS 650 sand, 0.5–1.0 mm size |
| Charge Quantity | 4000 g per impingement |
| Abrasion Loss | Mass loss after two impacts |
flowchart TD
A[Sand Hopper] --> B[Nozzle]
B --> C[Concrete Specimen Surface]
D[Compressor] --> E[Air Tube with Pressure Gauge]
E --> B
This setup guarantees uniform abrasion testing conditions as prescribed.
flowchart LR
A[Prepare 10 cm Cube] --> B[Oven Dry at 50°C for 24 hrs]
B --> C[Surface Rubbed with Emery Paper]
C --> D[Weigh Specimen]
D --> E[Mount on Carrier (10° Incline)]
E --> F[Position Nozzle 2.5 cm from Edge]
F --> G[Blast with 4000 g Sand at 0.14 N/mm²]
G --> H[Move Cradle Slowly (17 cm)]
H --> I[Rotate Specimen 180°]
I --> J[Repeat Blast]
J --> K[Clean and Reweigh Specimen]
K --> L[Calculate Mass Loss]
[ \text{Abrasion Loss (g)} = W_{before} - W_{after} ]
Where:
This method standardizes abrasion resistance assessment.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Specimen | Dry concrete cube |
| Nozzle Distance | 2.5 cm from specimen edge |
| Sand Charge | 4000 g |
| Surface Tested | Smooth vertical face |
| Number of Impacts | 2 (with 180° rotation) |
| Measurement | Mass loss (grams) |
flowchart LR
A[Weighed Dry Specimen] --> B[Place on Holder]
B --> C[Position Nozzle 2.5 cm from Edge]
C --> D[Sand Blast with 4000 g Charge]
D --> E[Move Cradle Slowly]
E --> F[Rotate Specimen 180°]
F --> D
D --> G[Clean and Reweigh Specimen]
G --> H[Calculate Mass Loss]
This ensures consistent abrasion resistance measurement.
[ m = m_1 - m_2 ] Where:
| Surface Category | Maximum Loss (%) |
|---|---|
| Concrete Pavement (mixed traffic) | 0.16 |
| Concrete Pavement (pneumatic tyres) | 0.24 |
| Factory Floors | 0.16 |
| Dockyards | 0.16 |
| Railway Platforms | 0.24 |
| Footpaths | 0.40 |
flowchart TD
A[Initial Specimen Mass (m1)] --> B[Perform Abrasion Test]
B --> C[Final Mass (m2)]
C --> D[Calculate Mass Loss (m = m1 - m2)]
D --> E[Repeat for 12 Test Surfaces]
E --> F[Compute Average Mass Loss]
F --> G[Convert to % Loss and Report]
| Surface Type | Max Abrasion Loss (%) |
|---|---|
| Concrete Pavements (mixed traffic) | 0.16 |
| Concrete Pavements (pneumatic tyres only) | 0.24 |
| Factory Floors | 0.16 |
| Dockyards | 0.16 |
| Railway Platforms | 0.24 |
| Footpaths | 0.40 |
flowchart TD
A[Test 3 Cubes] --> B[Measure 4 Faces Each]
B --> C[Calculate Weight Loss per Face]
C --> D[Average Weight Loss for 12 Faces]
D --> E[Convert to % Abrasion Loss]
E --> F[Compare with Maximum Allowable Limits]
This methodology assures consistent abrasion resistance evaluation.
| Surface Type | Abrasion Loss (g) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Roads and Airfields | 10–15 | High traffic zones |
| Industrial Floors | 8–12 | Moderate to heavy abrasion |
| Railway Platforms | 12–18 | Foot traffic exposure |
| Dockyards and Footpaths | 15–20 | Less frequent abrasion |
flowchart LR
A[Prepare Concrete Cube] --> B[Measure Initial Mass (M₁)]
B --> C[Perform Abrasion Test]
C --> D[Measure Final Mass (M₂)]
D --> E[Calculate Abrasion Loss (M₁ - M₂)]
E --> F[Compare with Recommended Limits]
This facilitates practical assessment of abrasion resistance.
Frequently Asked
Per Clause 4.1 of the standard, the required air pressure for the abrasion resistance test is maintained at 0.14 N/mm² (approximately 1.4 bar or 2 psi). The abrasive charge consists of sand graded between 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm as per IS 650-1966, with a charge quantity of 4000 grams per impingement. The abrasion loss is determined by measuring the mass loss after two successive impacts on the same concrete surface face. This air pressure ensures consistent sand velocity for reliable abrasion resistance measurements.
Loading diagram...
According to the standard, concrete specimens should be prepared as follows:
Key parameters:
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Number of specimens | 3 cubes |
| Specimen size | Standard 10 cm cube |
| Abrasive charge | 4000 g per impingement |
| Air pressure | 0.14 N/mm² |
| Measurement | Mass loss after two cycles on the same face |
This preparation ensures repeatable and accurate abrasion loss results.
Loading diagram...
The abrasive sand used in this test must conform to IS 650-1966 and meet the following criteria:
This ensures uniform particle size distribution, providing consistent abrasion during testing and replicating realistic wear conditions.
Loading diagram...
Abrasion loss is calculated by determining the mass lost by the concrete specimen after abrasion testing: [ \text{Abrasion Loss} = \text{Initial Mass} - \text{Final Mass} ] where the initial mass is measured before testing, and the final mass after two abrasive impressions on the same surface.
The test applies primarily to normal weight concrete (density 24-26 kN/m³), simulating abrasion on pavements, industrial floors, etc. Results are reported as mass loss in grams and rounded according to IS 2-1960. The standard’s Appendix A provides tentative permissible abrasion loss values for various surface types.
This method extends to stone and cement mortar surfaces as well.
Loading diagram...
Yes, the standard specifies that the abrasion resistance test method is suitable not only for concrete but also for related materials like stone and cement mortar (Clause 3.1). This makes the test versatile for assessing the surface durability of various construction materials.
Key points include:
This approach ensures consistent and reliable evaluation of abrasion resistance across different but similar materials.
Loading diagram...
Ask AI about any clause, requirement, or provision in IS 9284. Get instant, clause-cited responses powered by our indexed library.
Free tier includes 150 queries (50 AI + 100 Reference) · No credit card required